Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan

Update Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan for Kokand Water Supply System Document Stage: Final Report Project Number: 2633/ICB Water Supply and Sanitation Services Investment Program Tranche 2 October 2011

Uzbekistan: Water Supply and Sanitation Services

Prepared by PPMU of Uzbek Communal Services Agency “Uzkommunhizmat”

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

In 2009, the Government of the Republic of Uzbekistan (the Government) entered into a Financing Framework Agreement (FFA) with the Asian Development Bank (ADB) for a multitranche financing facility (MFF) to implement the Water Supply and Sanitation Services Investment Program (the Investment Program), in an aggregated amount not exceeding $300 million from ADB's Special Funds resources. On 29 September 2009 the ADB Board of Directors approved the MFF Program with the Uzbekistan Agency "Uzkommunhizmat" (UCSA) as the Executing Agency (EA).

For Tranche 2, the Government requested ADB to finance rehabilitation and expansion of water supply and wastewater management systems in Andijan and Kokand cities, and water supply system in Fergana, Margilan and Rishtan cities, which are priorities for development. Immediate rehabilitation and/or reconstruction of water supply and sanitation (WSS) systems and development of vodokanals' operational capacity is needed to prevent the systems from further deterioration and provide acceptable WSS services to about 1.1 million residents in these cities.

On 1 May 2010, between the Republic of Uzbekistan and Asian Development Bank was signed the Loan Agreement to undertake the Loan 2633-UZB in amount US $ 140 million for implementation of this project. The Loan Agreement came into effect on 10 August 2010.

The design organization PC “Loyiha Maslahat” was developed the detailed design documents on improvement of water supply system in Kokand city, which is the first stage of implementation of Tranche 2 project. This subproject provides: (i) construction of downhole water intake “Tulyash”; (ii) rehabilitation of Water distributing center “Ming-tut”; (iii) construction of trunk main “Tulyash” up to WDC “Ming-tut” and up to Kokand city.

The initial social assessment was conducted to identify social impacts of the proposed water supply subproject for Kokand City. The LARP was prepared for component (iii), construction and rehabilitation of water supply facilities for Kokand city, in March 2010, when the project at the feasibility study stage. Therefore updated LARP was required to be prepared at the Detailed Design stage. This update LARP is prepared by taking into account all changing of the designed, and all consequences related to land acquisition. These changes are summarized as follow:

Changing on detailed project component and impacts associated with land acquisition

LARP March 2010 Update LARP October 2011 CHANGING PROJECT DESIGN: 1 Rehabilitate 14 existing wells at Ming-Tut well No change field to supply 37,50 m3/day of water; 2 Construct 12 new wells in Tulyash to supply Construct only 9 wells in Tulyash to 47,000 m³/day of water supply 62,560 m³/day of water 3 Construct 9.3 km of 800 mm diameter raw Construct 12.1 km of 800 mm diameter

water transmission from Tulyash to Mig-Tut raw water transmission from Tulyash to WDC and to Kokand water distribution Mig-Tut WDC and to Kokand water network distribution network 4 Rehabilitate WDC “Ming-Tut”, including Rehabilitate WDC “Ming-Tut”, the storage reservoirs, structures and including the storage reservoirs, buildings, install new pumps and structures and buildings, install new chlorination unit and replace all pumps and chlorination unit and mechanical, electrical and control replace all mechanical, electrical and systems, with capacity of 84 000 m3/day; control systems, with capacity of 100 000 m3/day;

5 Replace 66.7 kms of corroded and leaking Replace 60.6 kms of corroded and pipe in the Kokand distribution system; leaking pipe in the Kokand distribution system;

6 Construct 3.9 kms of new distribution Construct 10.8 kms of new pipe, to expand the water system distribution pipe, to expand the water coverage in Kokand to 100% of the 2025 system coverage in Kokand to 100% urban population of 315,000 of the 2025 urban population of 315,000.

CHANGING ON IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH LAND ACQUISITION 1 Construction of 12 new wells in Tulyash Construction of 9 wells in Tulyash requires 2 hectares of land, and affected 2 requires 3.2 hectares of land, and farmers affected 3 farmers 2 Construction of 9.3 km of water supply Construction of 12.1 km of water supply transmission pipeline will require temporarily transmission pipeline will require 2.55 hectares land during construction, and temporarily 16.16 hectares land during affected 5 farmers construction, and affected 30 farmers

The objectives of the proposed LARP are: (i) to identify the project impact on the population or/and community in terms of loss of assets, livelihood and income; (ii) to outline measures to mitigate the adverse impact; and (iii) provide an estimate for budgetary allocation for compensation of loss of assets and resettlement benefits. And if required, for loss of income & livelihood, according to principles and guidelines provided in the entitlement matrix prepared for UZB: WSS Services Improvement Investment Program.

The proposed water supply subproject includes:

ƒ Rehabilitate 14 existing wells at Ming-Tut well field to supply 37,50 m3/day of water; ƒ Construct 9 new wells at Tulyash well field to supply 62,56 m3/day of water; ƒ Construct 12.1 km of Ø800 mm raw water trunk main from Tulyash up to WDC “Ming- Tut” and further to Kokand city; ƒ Rehabilitate WDC “Ming-Tut”, including the storage reservoirs, structures and buildings, install new pumps and chlorination unit and replace all mechanical, electrical and control systems, with capacity of 100 000 m3/day; ƒ Replace 60.6 kms of corroded and leaking pipe in the Kokand distribution system; ƒ Construct 10.8 kms of new distribution pipe, to expand the water system coverage in Kokand to 100% of the 2025 urban population of 315,000.

For construction of 9 new wells at “Tulyash” water intake the decision of Khokimiyat of Uzbekistan district of Fergana Oblast allocates 3.2 hectares of agricultural land permanently. As a result of this two farmers’ households will loss permanently 1.5 hectare of irrigated land each, and one farmers will loss 0.2 hectares, which are presently cultivated/planted with cotton and wheat. Construction of new 12.1 kms water supply trunk main will temporarily affect the 8.3 hectares of farmland planted to wheat, cotton and 10.78 hectares of households’ lands with trees and fruit trees. Total affected farmers and households of Tulyash Settlement and Kizilbog Settlement is – 30, including 8 – farmers and 22 – households.

Rehabilitation of 60.6 kms of existing distributing networks will not have adverse social impact since replacement of pipes will be located at existing areas allocated to vodakanal or to the Khokimiyat’s right-of way.

The remaining activities will not have any impacts on land acquisition and resettlement of the communities in the project areas as the project activities will be conducted in the existing sites, within the existing right of way or under the road.

A LARP budget was prepared to cover compensation for loss of crops, trees, and cover resettlement operation and management including training of representatives of vodakanal, makhalla and affected persons on land acquisition and resettlement in the amount of UZS 229.732 million (USD 134614).

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB – Asian Development Bank AF – Affected Family AP – Affected Person DMS – Detailed Measurement Survey EA – Executing Agency EMA –- External Monitoring Agency FY – Fiscal year GOU – Government of Uzbekistan GRC – Grievance Redress Committee IA – Implementing Agency IMA – Internal Monitoring Agency IP – Indigenous People LARF – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework LARP – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan MFF – Multi-tranche Financial Facility NGO – Non-Government Organization PC – project consultants PFR –- Periodical Financial Request PLARC – Provincial Land Acquisition and Resettlement Commission PPMU – Program Preparation and Management Unit SCLRGCSC – State Committee on Land Resources, Geodesy, Cartography and State cadastre SESU – Social and Environment Sub-Unit

NOTE

(i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Beneficiary Community: All persons and households situated within the government-owned or acquired property, who voluntarily seek to avail and be part of the Program and represented by a community association that is duly recognized by the community residents, accredited by the local government, and legally registered with appropriate institutions / competent authorities. Compensation: Payment in cash or in kind of the replacement cost of the acquired assets. Entitlement: Range of measures comprising compensation, income restoration, transfer assistance, income substitution, and relocation which are due to affected persons, depending on the nature of their losses, to restore their economic and social base. Cut-off-date: shall conform to the date of commencement of the affected persons (AP) census in the specified area. Land Acquisition: The process whereby a government agency compulsorily alienate all or part of the land a person owns or possesses and transfer the ownership and possession to the government agency for public purpose in return for a consideration. Affected Person/People (AP): Any person affected by program-related changes in use of land, water, natural resources, or income losses. APs include those having losses as described in Table 2, the Entitlement Matrix which includes both titled and non-titled persons experiencing resettlement impacts due to the Program. Affected Family: All members of a household, residing under one roof and operating as a single economic unit, who are adversely affected by the program or any of its components. It may consist of a single nuclear family or an extended family group. Rehabilitation: Compensatory measures provided under the Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework other than payment of the replacement cost of acquired assets. Replacement Value: The amount required for the Affected Household to replace/reconstruct the assets acquired by the government agency through purchase in the open market. See Table 2: Entitlement Matrix in this document. Resettlement: All measures taken to mitigate any and all adverse impacts of the program on AP’s property and/or livelihood, including compensation, relocation (where relevant), and rehabilitation. Below Poverty Line (BPL) Households: There is no designated sum determined by the Government of Uzbekistan to define a BPL household. For the purpose of this Project, the World Bank definition of poverty line for Central Asia (2003-2005) of US$ 2.15 per day per person or UZS 3 669.21 per day per person will be used. (Further this number will be used) Minimum Wage Rate: The official minimum wage rate declared is UZS 49 735 per person a month, will be used for providing assistance allowance for 3 months for affected persons belonging to the vulnerable group and those affected persons by the project by more 10% of their assets and properties. Vulnerable Households: Households headed by women, having disabled persons, ethnic minorities, elderly persons living alone and BPL households.

CONTENTS

Page

I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SUBPROJECT DETAILS 1 III DESCRIPTION OF IMPACTS 5 A. Project Area 5 B. The LAR Implications 5 C. Socio-economic Profile of Affected Households 8 D. Indigenous People 9 IV. OBJECTIVES, POLICY FRAMEWORK, AND ENTITLEMENTS 10 V. COMPENSATION AND ENTITLEMENT 14 A. Compensation for the Affected Properties 14 B. Gender Issues 14 VI. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION 14 VII. ORGANIZATIONAL SET-UP 14 VIII. GRIEVANCE AND REDRESS MECHANISM 16 IX. TRAINING IN LARP IMPLEMENTATION 17 X. COST ESTIMATES AND BUDGETS 17 XI. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 18 XII. MONITORING AND EVALUATION 20 XIII APPENDIXES 21

1

I. INTRODUCTION

1. The Uzbekistan Water Supply and Sanitation (WSS) Services Improvement Investment Program has been initiated with a view to improving living standard in urban areas with the help of upgrading water supply and sanitation services which, till now, is less than satisfactory. Access to safe water and sanitation facilities have direct impact on poverty reduction and welfare improvement strategy. Apart from investment in physical infrastructure the program also proposes for long term capacity building and institutional strengthening of the executing agency and staff training. 2. This Land Acquisition and Resettlement Plan (LARP) for the Water Supply System was prepared to mitigate impact of land acquisition in the improvement and rehabilitation the water distribution system network which includes expansion of the existing well field, construction of new wells, transmission main and rehabilitation and expansion of the existing distribution system in the urban areas. 3. The Updated LARP has been prepared based on census/socio-economic survey and consultation meetings with the affected persons/households, vodakanal, cadastral authorities and the Khokimiyat was carried out considering the outcome of the preliminary engineering and technical design. 4. The objectives of the proposed LARP are as follows: (i) identify the project impact on the community in terms of loss of assets, livelihood and income; (ii) outline measures to mitigate the adverse impact; and (iii) provide an estimate for budgetary allocation for compensation of loss of assets and resettlement benefits. And if required, for loss of income & livelihood, according to principles and guidelines provided in the entitlement matrix prepared for UZB: WSS Services Improvement Investment Program. The primary purpose of this LARP is to identify steps to restore the living standards of the affected persons (APs) to the pre-project situation within a short period of time without any disruptions in their own economic and social environment

II. SUBPROJECT DETAILS

5. The subproject is intended to expand the existing well field, construct new wells, trunk main and rehabilitate and expand the existing distribution system in Kokand city. (i) Rehabilitate 14 existing wells at Ming-Tut well field to supply 37,50 m3/day of water; (ii) Construct 9 new wells at Tulyash well field to supply 62,56 m3/day of water; (iii) Construct 12.1 km of Ø800 mm raw water trunk main from Tulyash up to WDC “Ming-Tut” and further to Kokand city; (iv) Rehabilitate WDC “Ming-Tut”, including the storage reservoirs, structures and buildings, install new pumps and chlorination unit and replace all mechanical, electrical and control systems, with capacity of 100 000 m3/day; (v) Replace 60.6 kms of corroded and leaking pipe in the Kokand distribution system; (vi) Construct 10.8 kms of new distribution pipe, to expand the water system coverage in Kokand to 100% of the 2025 urban population of 315,000.

2

6. The assessments of the above works show the following:

(i) The 9 new wells at Tulyash will require 3.2 hectares of agricultural land permanently. Two farmers will lose permanently 1.5 hectare of land each, one household 0.2 hectare of land, which are presently cultivated/planted with cotton and wheat (Table 2);

(ii) The new 12.1 kms water supply trunk main will temporarily affect the 19.08 hectares (8.3 hectares are in Table 2 + 10.78 hectares are in Table 2a) of farmland and households planted to wheat, cotton and fruit trees of 30 affected farmers of Tulyash Settlement and Kizilbog Settlement;

(iii) Rehabilitation of 60.6 kms of existing distributing networks will not have adverse social impact since replacement of pipes will be located at existing areas allocated to vodakanal or to the Khokimiyat’s right-of way;

(iv) The remaining activities will not have any impacts on land acquisition and resettlement of the communities in the project areas as the project activities will be conducted in the existing sites, within the existing right of way or under the road.

3

Figure 1: Layout of Kokand Water Supply System

4

Figure 2: Layout of Kokand Water Supply System and the Affected Households

5

III. DESCRIPTION OF IMPACTS

A. Project Area

7. The Kokand City with a total population of 221,100 is currently being served by the existing water supply system of 72,000 m3/day covering around 98.1 (%) of the total population. Existing pipes are corroded and leaking, 14 existing wells and pumps are not working well, and chlorinator is not functioning. Because of these numerous problems, the subproject will construct 9 new wells in Tulyash, construction 10.8 kms of new distribution pipes, replace 60.6 kms of existing pipes, and rehabilitate existing wells and other facilities that are not functioning well. Of these activities the 9 new wells at Tulyash will require 3.2 hectares of agricultural land permanently and 19.08 hectares (8.3 hectares are in Table 2 + 10.78 hectares are in Table 2a) for temporarily affect.

8. The census of the affected persons was conducted on 8 June 2011. The day the census was completed, that is, 8 June 2011 is considered as census cut-off-date. No person, building, any structures or cause, any kind of land use change, after the census cut-off-date, will be considered eligible for resettlement assistance or compensation.

B. The LAR Implications

9. The census revealed that 30 households will be affected by the subproject with the following detailed: (i) the expansion of water intake at Tulyash wells will affect 3 households that will loss permanently their small portion of cotton and wheat farmlands; The total permanent loss is 3.2 hectares (ii) the construction of 12.1 kms of main trunk will affect 30 households included 3 household that will loss permanently their cotton and wheat farmland, another 5 households that will loss temporarily their cotton and wheat farmlands, and 22 household that will loss their land temporarily but loss their fruit trees and trees permanently. The total temporarily loss due to construction of this main trunk is 16.16 hectares (Table 1, and Table 2) The summary of crop loss is summarized in Table 3.

Table 1. Affected Cotton and Wheat Farmlands (Permanent and Temporary) % of impact Area of Area of Total Land of land loss AF Type of Permanent Temporary Farm Area (permanent No. Ownership Acquisition Acquisition (hectares) and/or (hectares) (hectares) temporary) Registered 1 Ozodbek Rashid Fayz 68.4 0.20 0.33 0.77 Leaseholder Registered 2 Maslohat Aziz 202.2 1.50 0.27 0.88 Leaseholder Jurakuzi Kizil bog Registered 3 74.6 1.50 1.50 4.02 sahovati Leaseholder

6

Meliboy Mumin Registered 4 69.9 - 1.50 2.14 Tulyash Usmon Leaseholder Risolatoy Murodjon Registered 5 53.2 - 2.50 4.69 Yodgor Leaseholder Registered 6 Sohibkor Togay 48.0 - 0.20 0.41 Leaseholder Kimyogar Registered 7 64.1 - 1.0 1.56 Leaseholder Registered 8 Nazarov Holishon bogi 7.9 - 1.0 12.66 Leaseholder Total 587.39 3.2 8.3

Table 3. Temporary Affected Lands with Trees

Total Land AF Type of Owner Area Fruit Trees Trees No. Ownership (hectares) 1 Ergashev Adham 0.98 - 60 2 Umarov Fahritdin 0.46 22 - 3 Yusufhujaev Jalolhon 1.31 13 78 4 Muydinov Shuhrat 0.84 - 91 5 Ergashev Akmal 1.2 85 76 6 Komilov Odiljon 1.2 - 580 7 Hoshimov Shuhrat 0.4 15 167 8 Ahmedov Mansur 0.33 - 400 9 Hoshimov Shuhrat 0.04 Unregistered - 12 10 Ashurov Rahmonjon 0.31 Leaseholders 23 18 11 Juraev Salimjon 0.04 not having 2 64 legal 12 Dadaboev Akbar 0.13 certification / - 43 13 Dadaboev Umarjon 0.09 registration on - 100 14 Juraev Otajon 0.71 the land 85 - 15 Mullajonov Sidikjon 0.28 10 2 16 Holmatov Maksudali 0.91 27 52 17 Parpiev Shuhrat 0.04 - 13 18 Begmatov Tohir 0.26 - 13 19 Begmatov Tulkin 0.25 - 21 20 Toshpulatov Ikromjon 0.3 15 16 21 Yuldashev Kimsanjon 0.31 - 32 22 Mirzaev Kurbonali 0.39 12 39

7

Total 10.78 309 1877

Table 3. Summary of Losses Of Crops and Trees

Area Crops and Type of loss No. of AHs (hectares) No. of trees 1 Loss of crops (cotton and wheat) 8 8.3 cotton, wheat 309 fruit 2 Loss of trees and fruit trees 22 10.78 trees, 1887 trees Total 30 19.08 Source: Census & socioeconomic survey, June 2011

10. The census was able to cover 100 % of affected households (30 Households). The total number of affected persons (AP) is 169. Of these affected persons, 86 are male and 83 are female. The average family size of the affected households is 5.5 persons. The summary of the census is provided in Table 4.

Table 4. Status of Census & Socio-economic Survey

Sl. Details No. 1 Total Affected Household 30 2 Household not found 0 3 Total household surveyed 30 4 Household responded 30 5 Total Affected Person 169 Source: Census & socioeconomic survey, June 2011

11. The Resettlement Framework (RF) prepared for the program classifies several groups of population as socially “vulnerable” and has provided special assistance for them. The vulnerable groups are: (a) those who are below the poverty line (BPL); (b) those who belong to indigenous people/ethnic minorities; (c) female-headed households (FHH); (d) single elderly; and (e) disabled persons. The census identified that there is one female-headed farm “Risolatoy Murodjon Yodgor” (headed by Sobirova Odinahon, ages Comment [d1]: Not in the list of affected households. PLEASE MAKE 56), that will be provided additional assistance as per resettlement framework. correction

C. Socio-economic Profile of Affected Households

12. A detailed socio-economic survey was carried out during the census in June 2011. Interviews were conducted with the head of the affected households (AFs) and other members at their families. Consultation meetings with the Cadastral Office, Vodakanal and Khokimiyat authorities to verify leaseholders of affected lands. The Table 5 provides a brief socio-economic profile of the affected persons.

Table 5: Summary Profile of the Affected Families

8

Characteristics Units Total Affected Households 30 Total Affected Persons 169 Average Family Size of Affected 5.5 persons Households Number of Females in Affected Household 83 Number of Males in Affected Household 86 Total No. of Ethnic minority household 0 Total No. of Female Headed Households 1 Total No. of Lease Holders 8 Total No. of Encroachers 22 Total no. of Workers No data Percentage of women to total employed No data Main Occupation of the Affected Persons Farming Source: Census & socioeconomic survey, June, 2011.

13. Based on the data of the surveyed affected households, the total number of affected people is 169. Of these, 86 (51%) are male and 83 (49%) are female. Household members range from 4 – 8 persons. Gender (male-female) ratio per household is almost 1:1 although in one household there are 3 males to 1 female and another household has 4 males to 2 females.

14. Of the all affected households, 8 affected households have big landholdings from 10.7 hectares to 202.2 hectares. (Refer to Table 1) All of these farmlands are irrigated and presently planted to wheat, and cotton. Land ownership is all 8 affected households are registered leaseholds.

Table 6: Social Stratification details of AFs

Criteria Classification No. of AFs Joint 12 Family Type Nuclear 3 Vulnerability Female-headed HH 1 HH with disabled persons 1 Low income HH 3 Up to 3 3 Family Size 4-5 17 More than 5 12 Source: Census & socioeconomic survey, June, 2011

15. The distribution of population by age groups of the affected households shows 11 (7%) persons belong to the age group of 7 years old and below; 26 (15%) persons belong to the age group of 8-17 years old; 32 (18%) have ages 18-25 years old; 82 (49%) belong to the age group of 26-54 and that 18 (11%) persons belong to 55 years old and above. There is 1 retired female and heads of household.

9

Table 7: Distribution of Affected persons by Age Group

Sl. Age-group Male Female Total % to total population 1 Less than 7 yrs 6 5 11 7 2 7 – 17 yrs 9 17 26 15 3 18 – 25 yrs 16 16 32 18 4 26 – (54) 59 yrs 45 37 82 49 5 Above (54) 59 yrs 10 8 18 11 Total* 86 83 169 100 Source: Census & socioeconomic survey, June, 2011. 16. Educational levels of the affected population show that 11 preschool and early elementary level children school, of which, 6 (15.7%) are boys and 5 (13.2%) are girls; 9 are in high school with 3 (7.9%) boys and 6 (15.7%) girls attending; for full secondary, 5 have attained this level, of which 2 (5.3%) are male and 3 (7.9%) are female; 3 have attended college which 1 (2.7%) is male and 2 (5.3%) are female; 10 are students which 9 (23.6%) are male and 1 (2.7%) is female.

Table 8: Educational Status of Affected Persons

Sl. Educational level Male Female Total % of the APs 1 Pre-school and Elementary 6 5 11 28.9 1 General secondary (7-9 grade) 3 6 9 23.7 Secondary vocational (coll / 5 13.2 2 2 3 lyceum 3 Student (coll./ lyceum / univ.) 1 2 3 7.8 4 University / PG 9 1 10 26.4 Total 21 17 38 100 Source: Census & socioeconomic survey, June, 2011.

17. Average monthly income of affected households range from Uzb soum 520,000 to Uzb soum 2,820,000. Of this, household income sources are from farming is 75%; from employment is 22.5%; and from other sources such as retirement and scholarship allowances is around 2.5%. Of the total household income, 68% are generated by the male and 32% are generated by the female. One of the affected households is headed by women.

D. Indigenous People

18. Ethnic groups found in Kokand City subproject are majority Uzbeks, some Russians, Tajiks, Tatars and few other ethnic groups. The subproject will not affect any indigenous peoples groups.

10

IV. OBJECTIVES, POLICY FRAMEWORK, AND ENTITLEMENTS

19. There are no laws or legislation in Uzbekistan that specifically address matters related to involuntary resettlement (IR). Rather land acquisition is governed by the following laws and resolutions: (i) The Land Code: approved by the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan from 30.04.1998, taking the changes of 2003-2004 into account; (ii) The Civil Code of Republic of Uzbekistan from 1996, taking the changes of 2004-2008 into account; (iii) Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on “State Cadastre” N171-II from 15.12.2000 (iv) Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan on “State land cadastre” N666-I from 28.08.1998г taking the changes of 2002-2004 into account (v) Cabinet of Ministers Resolution on “Approval of Regulation on the order of legalization of seizure and allocation of land plots for non-agricultural needs in the Republic of Uzbekistan” No. 248, 27 May 1992 (vi) Cabinet of Ministers Resolution on “Approval of the Regulation on the order of adjudication of land disputes in the Republic of Uzbekistan” №246 from 25.05.1992; (vii) Cabinet of Minister Resolution on “Order of realization into private property of objects of trade and public services together with land plots, where they are located, and land plots into life inheritance tenure” №126 from 11.04.1995, taking the changes of CoM Resolution № 202 from 30.04.1999 into account; (viii) Resolution of CoM “On approval of the sizes of agricultural production losses compensation, relating to land acquisition, for needs not connected with farming or forestry management” № 223 from 16.06.1995; (ix) Resolution of CoM “On approval of the regulation on the order of identification of the sizes of agricultural production losses compensation, relating to land acquisition, for needs not connected with farming or forestry management” № 282 from 15.06.1992;

20. Collectively, these regulations provide a sound basis for acquiring land for public purposes and for compensating land users according to the registered use of the land (i.e. for cultivation, business, residence etc).

21. ADB’s Land Acquisition and Resettlement Framework and ADB’s Safeguard Policy Statement (SPS), 2009 state:

(i.) The following categories of affected persons will be entitled to compensation and/or rehabilitation benefits: a. Affected Persons (APs) losing irrespective of whether land is under valid legal rights or customary rights or without legal status; b. Tenants and sharecroppers (the workers working for a share of a crop) whether registered or not; c. Owners of buildings, crops, trees and other other objects attached to the land; and

11

d. APs losing business or income/employment opportunities

(ii.) APs and affected assets will be identified through a detailed survey/census or detailed measurement survey (DMS). The DMS end date will be the census cut-off date for compensation eligibility. APs settling in affected areas after this date will not be eligible for compensation. They will be given sufficient advance notice to vacate and dismantle the affected land/structures. Their dismantle structures will not be confiscated nor will they be fined or sanctioned.

22. The census date of 6 June 2011 has been considered as the cut-off-date for APs’ eligibility for entitlement. The entitlement matrix followed the LARF prepared for the facilities. People moving in the project area after the cut-off date will not be entitled to any assistance.

23. UCSA’s PPMU and PIUs SESU will use the LARP as a planning tool, verify and update the inventory prior to implementation of the project, and provide ID cards to the entitled affected persons for compensation and resettlement purposes. The principles applicable in defining the entitlements and compensation packages for the affected households shall remain unchanged. A detailed Entitlement Matrix as described in LARF is provided in Table 9.

Table 9: Entitlement Matrix

Loss type Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements

Permanent All land Farmer / Land for land compensation with plots of loss of losses Titleholder equal value/productivity to plots lost; or Arable Land independent cash compensation at replacement cost of impact with application of multiplying factors, severity considering real supply and demand, registration and transfer charges if any to be borne by the project: if the land plot is obtained at auction, then compensation of land purchase cost. Unaffected portions of a plot will also be compensated if they become unviable after impact occurs. Leaseholder Transfer of lease to other plots of equal (registered or value/productivity of plots lost, or Cash not) equivalent to the net income from the land calculated on the basis of the market value of annual production of affected land for the remaining lease years (up to maximum 10 years). Sharecroppers Cash compensation equal to market value

12

Loss type Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements (registered or of the lost harvest share once (temporary not) impact) or twice (permanent impact) Agricultural Cash indemnity corresponding to their workers losing salary in cash and kind for the remaining their contract part of the agricultural year/or contractual period. Non-titled 1 rehabilitation allowance equal to 1 cultivators year's net income from the affected land (in addition to lost crop compensation) for land use loss.

Additional Farmer / 1 severe impact allowance equal to the provisions for Titleholder net income from annual crop production severe Leaseholder (inclusive of winter and summer crop in impacts addition to standing crop compensation) (> 10% of and the waiving of taxes and fees land loss) Sharecroppers 1 severe impact allowance equal to the (registered or net income from their annual share of not) harvest lost (additional to standard crop compensation) Non-titled land 1 severe impact allowance equal to the owners net annual income from the affected land (additional to standard crop compensation). cash compensation in amount of taxes and compulsory payments for 1 year

Temporary All APs Affected land/communal infrastructure will Land (including be restored or reconstructed to pre-project Acquisition those, who has conditions. right of use) Rent shall be agreed between landowner and contractor equal to the revenue lost at market value (e.g. compensation for harvests lost at average yield/hectare). Payment of such compensation to be assured by the Project by the means of LA for temporal use Act

Residential/ Titleholder Land for land compensation through Commercial provision of a plot comparable in Land value/location to the plot lost; or Cash compensation for affected land at full

13

Loss type Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements replacement cost with application of multiplying factors, considering real supply and demand,, registration and transfer costs, if any, to be borne by the project: if the land plot is obtained at auction, then compensation of land purchase cost Non-titled land Provision of a free or leased plot in a owners Government resettlement area or a self- relocation allowance equal to 1 year at minimum salary:

Houses Full/partial owners Cash compensation at replacement rate for Buildings loss of (with/without affected structure/fixed assets free of and structures house or salvageable materials, depreciation and Structures building transaction costs. For partial impacts, full registration) cash assistance to restore remaining structure. Cost of lost water and electricity connections will be included in the compensation. Tenant / Compensation of the lost incomes of Leaseholder tenancy of houses, buildings and structures at a rate of annual cost of rent

Standing Crops All APs Cash compensation equivalent to the gross Crops affected (including non- income from the crop computed as the titled land market value of the total annual produce owners from affected land. To be paid both to landowners and tenants based on their specific sharecropping agreements.

Trees Trees All APs Cash compensation shall reflect income affected (including non- replacement. Fruit trees will be valued at titled land market value multiplied on the number of owners) years until the end of fruiting period; or in case of granting the land plot instead of alienated one, the compensation of full cost of seedling, cost of preparation of a garden and lost profit at annual income multiplied the number of years till the trees gain fruiting period will be paid

Business/ Temporary/ All APs Business owner: (i) Cash compensation Employmen permanent (including non- equal to 1 year's income, if loss is t loss of titled land permanent; (ii) cash compensation for the business or period of business interruption, if loss is

14

Loss type Specification Affected People Compensation Entitlements employment owners) temporary. Compensation is estimated on the basis of tax declarations, imputed earnings or average income in this area Worker/employees: Indemnity for lost wages for the period of business interruption (including fixed by oral agreement with employer) up to a maximum of 3 months.

Livelihood Vulnerable AP: 1 additional allowance equal to 3 months at AP below minimum salary. Priority for employment in poverty line project-related jobs, training opportunities, self-employment and wage-employment assistance

Relocation Transport/ All APs affected Provision of cash compensation to cover transitional by relocation transport expenses and livelihood livelihood expenses for one month costs House tenants on the basis of documents, confirming the income of household members, but no less than 1 minimum salary per member

Community Loss / Rehabilitation/replacement of affected assets damage to structures/utilities (i.e. mosques, public footbridges, roads, schools, health centres, infrastructure etc.) to pre-Program level / utilities

V. COMPENSATION AND ENTITLEMENT

A. Compensation for Affected Properties

24. The LARP provides the compensation details according to LARF prepared for the MFF program. As described in the entitlement matrix (Table 9), the compensation for all type loss in terms of assets / livelihood, temporary loss and other unanticipated loss will be given due consideration for preparing compensation adequate for rebuilding life of the APs at pre-project level.

25. Land for land compensation for loss of permanent arable and irrigated land registered or not registered land will be provided with plots of equal value/productivity to plots lost or with cash compensation at replacement cost with application of multiplying factors, considering real supply and demand, registration and transfer charges if any to be borne by the project; if the land plot is obtained at auction, then compensation of land will

15 be equal to purchase cost at the present value. Unaffected portions of a plot will also be compensated if they become un-viable for production after impact occurs.

26 Temporary loss of land, with or without registration, affected infrastructure will be restored or reconstructed to the pre-project conditions.

27. Compensation for standing crops, including titled or non-titled land owners, cash compensation equivalent to the gross income from the crop computed as the market value of the total annual produce from the affected land. This type of compensation will be paid both to the landowners and tenants based on specific sharecropping agreements. Unit price per ton per hectare of wheat is UZS 293 800; for cotton is UZS 647 800; and for vegetables is UZS 220 500.

28. Compensation for fruit and non-fruit trees, including non-titled land owners, in amount of tariffs according to Catalogue of integrated indicators of compensations of nonresidential buildings and structures. GOST-4 (National Standards), Section 4. Objects of an external accomplishment and gardening.

29. Additional allowance for 1 vulnerable affected farm: one female-headed farm is equal to 3 months multiplied by the minimum wage per month of UZS 49 735 for vulnerable person. During the implementation, it will be ensured that compensation is paid directly to the de facto head of the household.

VI. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION

30. During the census, and socio-economic survey, consultations as well as focus group discussions were held with the affected people, beneficiaries, the makhalla community members, as well as with the secondary stakeholders of the project, namely, the government officials of the province. The design engineering team together with vodokanal and makhalla officials met the persons/households likely to be affected and had a discussion with them regarding project scope, compensation that will be adopted, benefits to be accrued, and verification of documents showing ownership/possession right over land use/structures, etc that are within proposed alignment drawing. Certain facts about land ownership status of the project area and the people likely to be affected were identified from these discussions and through the survey.

31. Once this short LARP is approved, the affected people will be informed about the formal procedures of compensation payment and all other relevant details.

VII. ORGANIZATIONAL SET-UP

32. In accordance with the legislation of Uzbekistan province commission on land acquisition and district evaluation boards are responsible for conducting of a resettlement. Such commissions include representatives of the following authorities:

• Province/district department of the State Committee on Land Resources, Geodesy, Cartography and State cadastre (SCLRGCSC)

16

• Province/district Hydromeliorative Expedition • Province/Department/District Unit of Goskompriroda (State Nature Protection Committee) • Province/district divisions of SES • Province/district fire units • Beneficiary organizations and contractors (UCSA, EA, the Social and Environment Sub-Unit (SESU), Design Institute. Project Consultants).

33.. The commission includes all the affected legal entities and individuals or their holders of power. In addition to government organizations and agencies non-government organizations such as water users associations (WUAs), association of farmers, (AF)s, women’s committee and makhallas may be involved in resettlement procedures to ensure safeguards of rights and legitimate interests of the affected land users.

34. UCSA has overall responsibility for all aspects of the program. The Program Preparation and Management Unit (PPMU) within UCSA is responsible for the day to day management of the program including LAR and cross-agency coordination and for compensation disbursement.

35. The Social and Environment Sub-Unit (SESU) and Project Implementation Unit (PIU)/ vodokanal under the PPMU will directly participate in all LAR related planning, implementation, inter-agency coordination and monitoring. However, they will carry out this responsibility with technical assistance from the project consultants (PC) of the program and with the active participation of the district/municipal executive powers and as advised by SCLRGCSC from time to time.

36. Design Institute is in charge in elaborating the design and construction documents for the project. It will collaborate with the PC, SESU and PIU to: (i) assemble all documents required for compensation; (ii) carry out topographic surveys of the expropriated land and replacement lands; (iii) elaborate layouts indicating the location of the worksites and the permanent infrastructures and the perimeter of the required surfaces differentiating the land use patterns in the areas being occupied to serve as a base for the selection of compensation land; (iv) establish layouts of the lands proposed as option for compensation; (v) conduct the land marking and pegging of the land assigned for temporary use and permanent occupation and of the compensation lands. The design institute, in collaboration with resettlement team of the PSC and PIU, will review the LARPs and provide the necessary information for an updated estimate of the effective compensation plan and related cost for each subproject.

37. Project Consultant–Resettlement Team is engaged to design and assist in the implementation of subprojects under the program. The PSC will have sufficient in house expertise on resettlement consisting of international and national resettlement specialists. With the assistance from the Design Institute and PIU, they will analyze the cadastral maps, carry out DMS, conduct first level compensation negotiation with the APs and prepare subproject LARPs. The PC will submit these LARPs to the respective vodokanal/PIU and to SLAU division for approval. After its approval, PSC will submit LARPs to the respective Province and Rayon LAR Commission.

17

38. Local government agencies involved in LARP review and implementation are Province (Oblast) and District (Rayon) Executive Authorities who form Province Commissions on Land Acquisition and District Evaluation Commissions. These commissions will form a provincial land acquisition and resettlement committee (PLARC) which include the institutions as described below.

39. Province Commission on Land Acquisition, established under the Province Khokimiyat decision undertakes the following: (i) outlines location of constructions and structures, envisaged by the project; (ii) selects land plot for construction site, (iii) prepares and approves an Act for the right to use the land plot (title) and (iv) approved the Act for the right to use the land plot, specifying areas of the acquired farm land, accepted norms and total agricultural production losses. In addition to permanent members the Commission includes representatives of UCSA, as well as affected legal entities and individuals.

40. The Evaluation Commission established under the district khokimyat decision estimates losses of land owners and land users in accordance to the standard procedure, as well as losses in agricultural output as a result of the farm land acquisition based on data provided by the design institute. The commission prepares an Act for the right to use the plot of land specifying the acquired farm land area, accepted norms and total value of losses and agricultural output losses.

41. The regional representatives of the SCLRGCSC is the key executive authority responsible for the following: (i) identify land losses, incurred by land owners and land users as well as agricultural output losses; (ii) determine the degree and area of land re-cultivation, including removal and temporal storage of productive soil layer; (iii) determine the need for protective sanitary and water protection zones around the constructions being built and regime of their use; (iv) prepare proposals on allocation of land plots of equal value instead of the acquired; (v) estimate possibility and approximate cost of development of new land instead of the acquired; (vi) approve the Benchmark Setting up Act and the attached plan; (vii) amend the government acts on land use and land ownership as well as other cadastre documents.

42. Department of SCNP: (i) environmental impact assessment of construction projects and implemented methods; (ii) approves location of the sites affecting the land condition; (iii) develops measures for land protection for designed sites and launched facilities adversely affecting the land; and (iv) approves the Act on Land Plot Acquisition.

43. Government SES and Fire Inspection and Water Supervision authorities approve the Act of the Land Plot Acquisition.

44. At town/regional/ rayon level a grievance redress committee (GRC) will be established with the involvement of PIU/SESU/PC, leaders of affected makhallas and Hakimiyat (the local executive body).

18

VIII. GRIEVANCE AND REDRESS MECHANISM

45. A grievance redress mechanism will be developed in this sub-project areas for addressing the grievances/decisions not agreeable to the APs, particularly actions in reacted with compensation or payment disbursement. The APs will be fully informed of their entitlement according to the short LARP and the procedures for addressing their complaints/ grievances during public consultation, census survey, and verification of measurement survey at the time of implementation. The procedure of grievance redress will be incorporated in the disclosure pamphlet that will be distributed prior to implementation.

46. In order to prevent grievances rather than to redress these through a process to avoid lengthy redress process, participatory consultation with the affected households will be undertaken during LAR planning and implementation stages. If the grievances fail to be resolved, all attempts will be made to resolve those informally at the local makhalla level. If this attempt fails, APs will have the option of taking their complaints to the formal mechanism of addressing grievances described in Table 10.

Table 10: Grievance Redress Process

Assets Compensation Issues 1. First, complaints resolution will be attempted at town/district (Rayon) level of grievance and redress committee with the involvement of the PC, leaders of the affected Makhallas and Khokimiyat (the local executive body) 2. In absence of a settlement, APs may lodge a complaint to District/Oblast Khokimiyat as part of provincial land acquisition and resettlement committee (PLARC) and get a reply within 15 days. 3. If the District/Oblast Khokimiyat decision is unacceptable to the APs, they he/she may approach the appropriate court of law for its resolution.

IX. TRAINING IN LARP IMPLEMENTATION

47. All PIU staff, project consultants (PCs), SESU officials, leaders of Makhallas, Khokimiyat, representatives of SCLGRCSC, and District evaluation committee who will be involved in LAR activities will undergo an orientation and training in ADB’s involuntary resettlement policy as stated in the ADB SPS, 2009 and implementation of RP. The training will be provided by the international specialist under the Program consultant’s contract and will cover the following topics:

(i) principles and procedures of land acquisition based on Uzbekistan's law and regulation; (ii) principles and guidelines of ADB’s involuntary Resettlement as stated in the SPS, 2009 (iii) public consultation and participation; (iv) entitlements and compensation & assistance disbursement mechanisms; (v) grievance resolution; and

19

(vi) monitoring of resettlement operations.

X. COST ESTIMATES AND BUDGETS

48. The total estimated budget for compensation of losses of assets and properties, resettlement assistance and training cost is UZS 229 882 066 (equivalent to $ 137 701 at the rate UZS 1706.61 = US $ 1). A break up of cost estimate is given in the Table 11 below. Table 11: Estimated LAR Cost and Budget

Sl. Total Cost Item Unit Quantity Unit Rate Totals No. (UZS) A. Compensation 1 Land Permanent (irrigated arable hectare Refer to 97 679 400 97 679 400 3.2 land) Appendix 2a Temporary hectare 8.3 Subtotal of land loss 97 679 400 2 Trees of 8 farms Fruit Trees No. 180 Refer to Trees No. 165 Appendix 1a Subtotal Trees No. 345 4 085 956 3 Trees of 22 households Fruit Trees No. 309 Refer to Trees No. 1877 Appendix 5a Subtotal Trees No. 2186 105 243 986 105 243 986 4 Crops Cotton & Wheat hectare Refer to 3 889 500 3 889 500 3.2 (permanent) Appendix 3a Cotton & Wheat (temporary) hectare Refer to 18 68 862 18 68 862 8.3 Appendix 4a Subtotal of Crops 22 574 362 Subtotal of A 229 583 686 B. Resettlement Assistance 5 Vulnerability Female-headed affected 1 UZS 49 735 monthly 149 190 household Allowance for 3 months

Subtotal of B 149 190 Total of A+B+C 229 732 876 Total Cost of Resettlement 229 732 876

XI. IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE

49. UCSA as the Executing Agency (EA) will direct the PSC resettlement team with assistance from SESU and the design institute to verify documents of the APs and carry

20 out the detailed measurement survey of the affected assets. If any change in design alignment is foreseen, the team will notify UCSA particularly the SESU. The makhalla of Tulyash and Kizilbog settlement will be engaged as implementing agency and assist the SESU & PSC’s resettlement team particularly during payment disbursement and in resolving compensation issues.

50. Valuation of compensation and assistance will be done after detailed measurement of lost assets is done. Grievance, if any, will be addressed at this stage so that any delay in payment of compensation and assistance does not occur and contractor’s award is issued as per schedule.

51. After initiation of LARP the UCSA will take step to engage external monitor to review and evaluate the LARP implementation. Table 12 shows the tentative implementation schedule of LARP.

Table 12: Tentative Implementation Schedule of LARP Sl. LARP Implementation Activities Year 1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Scheduled completion 2 Preparation of action plan specifying M1 resettlement tasks for Social and Environment Sub-Unit (SESU), Consultants and NGOs, if any 7 Application to Province Khokimiyat on selection M3 of land plot for temporal or permanent acquisition for the construction under the project accompanied by all necessary permits 12 Informing land users on forthcoming land M4-M5 acquisition, provision of maps, written documents and full information of work plans, time schedule and duration of acquisition procedures, information on compensation, grievance redress process. Processing of claims and consideration of proposals 13 Getting Act on Land Acquisition Approval from M5 the Oblast Commission 15 Submission of LARP to SESU, Oblast M6 Commission on LAR 16 Publication of the Resettlement plan, M7 dissemination of the plan and information flyers in the Uzbek language among the affected communities; posting of the English version at the ADB website. 17 Informing the affected persons on moving M7 /demolition of structures 18 Payment of compensation by the UCSA/PIU M8-M9

21

Sl. LARP Implementation Activities Year 1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Scheduled completion 19 Review of the Resettlement Plan M10 implementation 20 Approval of contract award by ADB M10 21 Getting Benchmark Setting up Act in the district M10- Khokimiyat and Act on Right to Use the Land M11 Plot and the Oblast Khokimiyat 22 Issue of notification on start of construction M11 work if the implementation of the resettlement plan was recognized as satisfactory, 23 Demolition/shifting of the affected M12 structures/assets. Amending the land cadastre documents 24 CYCLIC/CONTINUOUS TASKS M12 25 Internal control. Quarterly reporting on LAR M6 M12 issues to the ADB 26 External monitoring annual report to the M12 ADB/Independent assessment of the Resettlement Plan

XII. MONITORING AND EVALUATION

59. All LAR tasks under the program will be subject to both internal and external monitoring. Internal monitoring will be conducted by UCSA's SESU.

60. Internal monitoring will be carried out regularly by UCSA-SESU. The progress of LARP implementation to be carried out by PSC’s resettlement team and Mahalla will be communicated to ADB through the monthly Program Implementation Reports. Indicators for the internal monitoring will be those related to the processes and immediate outputs and results. This information will be collected directly from the field and reported monthly to the PMU. The monthly reports will be consolidated and included in the standard quarterly supervision reports to ADB. Internal monitoring will specifically focus on the status of: (i) information campaign and consultation with APs; (ii) revise implementation schedule in case of design change (iii) revise AP database in case of design change (iv) compensation and assistance payments for structures and trees / other assets; (v) payments for loss of income for the vulnerable HH; (vi) grievance redress, if any; and (vii) preparing monthly progress report.

61. The above information will be collected by the UCSA-SESU which will monitor the day-to-day resettlement activities of the Program through the following instruments: (i) review of census information for all APs;

22

(ii) consultation and informal interviews with APs; (iii) in-depth case studies; (iv) key informant interviews; and (v) community meetings.

62. A final evaluation of LARP implementation will be carried out about a year after completion of its implementation. The compelling reason for this study is to find out if the objectives of the LARP have been attained or not. The benchmark data of socioeconomic survey of severely affected APs conducted during the preparation of the LARP will be used to compare the pre and post program conditions. The evaluation will recommend appropriate supplemental assistance for the APs should the outcome of the study shows that the objectives of the LARP have not been achieved.

23

Appendix 1a

Table on calculation of compensation for taking down of fruit trees and non-fruiting trees for land acquisition of 8 farms exclusive of new planting

AF Outline Quantity Compensation Farms Tree No. No. (pieces) (UZS) 1 Ozodbek Rashid Fayz 316 mulberry tree 8 154 698 2 Maslohat Aziz 313 mulberry tree 7 135 361 3 Jurakuzi Botirjon 543 mulberry tree 14 270 721 Kizilbog sahovati 537 mulberry tree 9 174 035 330 331 332 349 4 Kimyogar 545 mulberry tree 31 599 454 533 mulberry tree 9 174 035 531 5 Sohibkor Togay 377 mulberry tree 14 270 721 mulberry tree 13 251 384 Meliboy Mumin 6 Tulyash Usmon 379 mulberry tree 7 135 361 39 mulberry tree 11 212 710 41 7 Nazirova Holishon 60 bogbon 46 mulberry tree 16 247 517 42 peach tree 180 957 193 43 45 8 Risolatoy Murodjon 37 mulberry tree 9 174 035 Yodgor 36 mulberry tree 17 328 733 35 84 85 Total 345 4 085 956

24

Appendix 2a

Table on calculation of compensation for permanent land acquisition from farms

Cost of irrigation Compensation Land and aquision of 1 Total Total for loss of Total Intensity Location No. Farms quality ha of equal new income income agricultural square factor 1,1 factor 1,3 score land under land for a year for 4 year products for a quality score year ha 000' UZS 000' UZS 000' UZS 000' UZS

Ozodbek 1 56 0,2 22086,4 460,0 1840,0 7582,5 Rashid Fayz 2 Maslohat Aziz 56 1,5 22086,4 473,0 1892,0 44960,5 Jurakuzi 3 Botirjon Kizilbog 56 1,5 22086,4 517,0 2068,0 45136,5 sahovati Total 3,2 97679,4

The calculation was made and delivered by cadastre services in Uzbekistan district of Fergana Oblast

25

Appendix 3a

Table on calculation of compensation for crop lossess at permanent land acquisition from farms

Land square Including: Total planted for permanent Crops of Average No. Farms area Square Amount land aquision Agriculture this area purchase price (ha) (t) (000' UZS) (ha) (t) (000' UZS)

Ozodbek Rashid 1 64,8 0,2 wheat 0,2 0,375 293,8 110,2 Fayz 2 Maslohat Aziz 202,5 1,5 wheat 1,5 7,065 293,8 2075,7

Jurakuzi Botirjon wheat 0,8 3,92 293,8 1151,7 3 74,6 1,5 Kizilbog sahovati cotton 0,7 0,852 647,8 551,9

Meliboy Mumin 4 69,9 0 wheat 0 0 293,8 0 Tulyash Usmon

Risolatoy Murodjon 5 53,2 0 wheat 0 0 293,8 0 Yodgor

6 Sohibkor Togay 48 0 wheat 0 0 293,8 0

7 Kimyogar 64,1 0 wheat 0 0 293,8 0 Nazirova Holishon 8 7,9 0 wheat 0 0 293,8 0 bogbon

Total 588,3 3,2 3,2 12,212 3889,5

26

Appendix 4a Table on calculation of compensation for crop lossess at temporary land acquisition from farms Land Fertilization cost square for Expenses Cost of Cost of (UZS) Cost of Other temporary before growing Amount No. Farms Agriculture seeds planting expences land planting crops (000' UZS) (UZS) (UZS) (UZS) aquision (UZS) nitrogen phosphorus (UZS) (ha) Ozodbek 1 Rashid wheat 0,33 6501 85800 34650 400554 8250 535755 Fayz Maslohat 2 wheat 0,27 26190 70200 28350 327726 6750 45216 Aziz Jurakuzi wheat 0,13 2561 33800 13650 157794 3250 211055 Botirjon 3 Kizilbog cotton 1,37 383600 86310 42772 230160 82200 4075750 41100 4947892 sahovati Meliboy wheat 0,87 17139 226200 91350 10560006 21750 1412445 Mumin 4 Tulyash cotton 0,63 176400 39690 22428 105840 37800 1874250 18900 227508 Usmon Risolatoy wheat 2,30 45310 598000 241500 2791740 57500 3734050 5 Murodjon Yodgor cotton 0,20 56000 12600 7120 33600 12000 595000 6000 722320 Sohibkor 6 cotton 0,20 56000 12600 7120 33600 12000 595000 6000 722320 Togay wheat 0,79 15563 205400 82950 958902 19750 1282565 7 Kimyogar cotton 0,21 58800 13230 7476 35280 12600 624750 6300 758436 Nazirova 8 Holishon wheat 1,00 19700 260000 105000 1213800 25000 1623500 bogbon Total 8,30 18684862

27

Appendix 5

Table on calculation of compensation for taking down of fruit trees and non-fruiting trees for temporary land acquisition of 22 household exclusive of new planting amount Square (hectares) Compensatio AF Diameter Owner Trees No. of trees Condition, age excluding ne No. Size (m) hectares (mm) planting (UZS 1 Ergashev Adham poplar 98x10 0,98 15 4 years 5,8 208 26 poplar 18 5 years 15,2 1 624 61 poplar 27 6 years 16,7 2 436 92 2 Umarov Fahritdin nutwood 4 platned on 1980 39,8 61 87 persimmon 44,5x10 0,46 2 3 years 5,2 2 90 pomegranate 1 2 years 58 almond tree 15 3 years 5,0 21 75 3 Yusufhujaev Jalolhon pussy willow 131x10 1,31 12 touchwood, medium 46,2 1 403 41 quince tree 3 sick, high rate 15,2 216 61 poplar 16 6 years 15 1 444 10 poplar 50 4 years 7 2 394 19 nutwood 4 sick 21,6 81 21 nutwood 5 sick 16,5 77 34 jida 1 14,3 5 31 4 Muydinov Shuhrat poplar 88,4x8 0,84 91 3,2 696 83 5 Ergashev Akmal peach 28 12,7 148 89 peach 35 3,8 20 30 poplar 150x8 1,2 38 7 1 819 58 poplar 38 5 454 66 mulberry tree 22 13 233 98 6 Komilov Odiljon poplar 300x4 1,2 580 10 34 375 78 7 Hoshimov Shuhrat poplar 132 16,5 11 933 00 poplar 8x5 0,4 35 3,8 335 01

28

mulberry tree 15 14 159 53 8 Ahmedov Mansur poplar 17 18 1 676 04 poplar 45x7 0,33 35 13 2 679 06 poplar 348 10 20 625 47 9 Hoshimov Shuhrat poplar 4x10 0,04 12 15 1 017 52 10 Ashurov Rahmonjon nutwood 31x10 0,31 2 13,3 21 21 cherry tree 8 6,3 11 60 quince tree 3 5 8 70 vine tree 3 9,8 20 30 pomegranate 4 3,8 4 64 poplar 17 12 1 209 73 pussy willow 1 15 84 79 apricot tree 1 5 years 20 7 73 nutwood 2 fruit-bearing 13 21 27 11 Juraev Salimjon poplar 20x2 0,04 15 10,19 906 43 poplar 45 5 538 42 poplar 4 3 years 9,5 42 54 quince tree 2 3 years 6 5 80 12 Dadaboev Akbar poplar 13x10 0,13 43 3,8 411 59 13 Dadaboev Umarjon poplar 33x4 0,09 25 10,5 1 556 64 poplar 35 5 418 77 poplar 40 4,4 421 16 14 Juraev Otajon mulberry tree 142x5 0,71 52 11,14 351 93 nutwood 2 9,55 13 53 quince tree 1 12,7 10 63 pomegranate 30 3,36 87 01 15 Mullajonov Sidikjon poplar 28x10 0,28 2 6,6 90 30 persimmon 10 4,14 11 60 16 Holmatov Maksudali poplar 181x5 0,91 8 18,4 805 97

29

poplar 1 5,7 13 63 poplar 41 10,19 2 477 58 pussy willow 2 38,2 275 36 pomegranate 22 10,19 148 89 nutwood 2 13,3 21 27 quince tree 1 17,5 10 63 apricot tree 2 31,8 19 33 17 Parpiev Shuhrat poplar 10x5 0,04 8 5,7 109 06 poplar 1 12,1 71 16 poplar 4 9,5 259 89 18 Begmatov Tohir poplar 25x10 0,26 2 6,6 90 30 poplar 1 19,1 104 61 poplar 10 15,9 904 01 19 Begmatov Tulkin poplar 10x24 0,25 2 15,9 180 80 poplar 19 12,7 1 431 05 20 Toshpulatov Ikromjon cherry tree 30x10 0,30 7 5,14 10 15 apricot tree 3 10,19 10 15 pomegranate 1 2,22 1 16 cherry tree 1 4,7 58 peach tree 3 7,96 4 35 poplar 8 20,7 907 30 poplar 8 15,9 723 21 21 Yuldashev Kimsanjon poplar 13x125 0,31 9 16,8 854 25 poplar 7 12,1 498 12 poplar 16 4,7 179 44 22 Mirzaev Kurbonali poplar 30x13 0,39 2 14,9 168 23 poplar 6 12,73 452 49 poplar 15 7,15 717 89 poplar 16 4,45 1 356 70 cherry tree 3 3,8 1 74 cherry tree 9 5 22 Total 10,78 ha 309+1877=2186 105 243 96