DOCSLIB.ORG

APPENDIX a Ogden/Weber State University Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis Draft Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APPENDIX a Ogden/Weber State University Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis Draft Final Report Alternatives Analysis Update Report Ogden/Weber State University Transit Project Study APPENDIX A Ogden/Weber State University Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis Draft Final Report Ogden-Weber State University Transit Corridor Alternatives Analysis Draft Final Report Prepared by: Utah Transit Authority MAY 2011 Final Draft Report – Alternatives Analysis Ogden/Weber State University Transit Corridor TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................. ES-1 ES.1 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH ........................................ ES-1 ES.3 SCREENING OF ALTERNATIVES ......................................................................... ES-2 ES.4 RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE ......................................................................... ES-3 ES.5 FINANCIAL ANALYSIS ........................................................................................... ES-4 ES.6 NEXT STEPS .......................................................................................................... ES-5 ES. 6.1 FTA Section 5309 ........................................................................................ ES-5 ES. 6.2 National Environmental Policy Act .............................................................. ES-6 1. OVERVIEW ................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT ........................................ 1-1 1.2 WHAT IS COVERED IN THE ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT ......................... 1-1 1.3 SCOPE OF THE AA AND EIS ....................................................................................... 1-2 Essential Tasks of the AA Process ............................................................................... 1-2 1.4 HOW THESE ALTERNATIVES WERE SELECTED ..................................................... 1-3 2. PURPOSE AND NEED .............................................................................. 2-1 2.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 PROJECT PURPOSE ................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 STATEMENT OF PROJECT NEED .............................................................................. 2-3 2.4.1 Increased Population and Employment Growth ................................................. 2-4 Regional Population and Employment .......................................................................... 2-4 Local Population and Employment ............................................................................... 2-5 2.4.2 Significant traffic congestion, declining roadway level-of-service and Air Quality ................................................................................................................. 2-6 Person Trips to 2030 (Project Study Area and Region) ................................................ 2-8 2.5 INADEQUATE TRANSIT SERVICE CONNECTING MAJOR ACTIVITY CENTERS ... 2-9 2.5.1 Activity Centers and Destinations ........................................................................ 2-9 2.5.2 Increasing Demand for Transit Service in the Study Area ................................. 2-12 2.5.3 Poor Transit System Reliability and Inability to Attract Choice Riders ............. 2-14 2.5.4 Insufficient service for transit-dependent populations....................................... 2-14 Low Income and Minority Populations ........................................................................ 2-15 Transit Dependent Population .................................................................................... 2-16 2.6 DEVELOPMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC CONSTRAINTS THAT LIMIT TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS .................................................................................. 2-16 2.7 SUPPORT REDEVELOPMENT, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, AND Final Draft Report ŇMay 2011 i Final Draft Report – Alternatives Analysis Ogden/Weber State University Transit Corridor SUSTAINABILITY ....................................................................................................... 2-16 2.8 SERVE FORECASTED WSU GROWTH .................................................................... 2-17 3. DEVELOPMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ..................................................... 3-1 3.1 EARLIER PLANNING STUDIES AND ALIGNMENTS .................................................. 3-1 3.2 MODE/TECHNOLOGY CHOICES ................................................................................ 3-1 3.3 DEVELOPING ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................... 3-2 3.4 INITIAL ALIGNMENT ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................ 3-2 3.5 REFINED ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................... 3-6 3.5.1 Downtown Segments ........................................................................................ 3-10 3.5.2 Cross-town Segments ...................................................................................... 3-10 3.5.3 WSU/McKay Dee Segment .............................................................................. 3-12 3.6 EVALUATING ALTERNATIVES .................................................................................. 3-15 3.6.1 Process .............................................................................................................. 3-15 3.6.2 Step 1: Initial Screening .................................................................................... 3-15 3.6.3 Step 2: Second Level Evaluations and Screening ........................................... 3-19 3.6.3.1 Transit Benefits/Ridership Potential ............................................................... 3-19 3.6.3.2 Cost ................................................................................................................ 3-20 3.6.3.3 Traffic ............................................................................................................. 3-20 3.6.3.4 Community Development ............................................................................... 3-20 3.6.3.5 Environmental Impacts .................................................................................. 3-20 4. EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ......................................................... 4-1 4.1 INITIAL SCREENING RESULTS .................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.1 Evaluation Results for the Downtown Segment .................................................. 4-1 4.1.2 Evaluation Results for the Cross-town Segment ................................................ 4-2 4.1.3 Evaluation Results for the WSU-McKay Dee Segment ...................................... 4-3 4.2 DETAILED EVALUATION, REFINEMENT AND SELECTION OF FINAL ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................... 4-4 4.2.1 Downtown Segment ............................................................................................. 4-6 Downtown Conclusions ...................................................................................... 4-6 4.2.2 Cross-town Alignments ....................................................................................... 4-7 4.2.3 WSU-McKay Dee Alignments ............................................................................. 4-9 WSU-McKay Dee Conclusions ......................................................................... 4-10 4.2.4 Ridership ........................................................................................................... 4-11 4.3 ADDITIONAL REFINEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ................ 4-12 4.3.1 Refinements in Alignments ............................................................................... 4-12 4.3.2 Traffic Analysis and Micro-simulation ............................................................... 4-12 Economic and Community Development Information ...................................... 4-14 5. AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC OUTREACH .......................... 5-1 5.1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND POLICY COMMITTEES ........................................... 5-1 5.2 EARLY SCOPING PERIOD .......................................................................................... 5-1 Final Draft Report ŇMay 2011 ii Final Draft Report – Alternatives Analysis Ogden/Weber State University Transit Corridor Agency Scoping Meeting Results ................................................................................. 5-3 Public Scoping Comments ............................................................................................ 5-3 5.3 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE ................................................................................................. 5-7 5.4 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ...................................................................................... 5-7 5.5 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND AGENCY COORDINATION .......................................... 5-8 6. RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE ............................................................ 6-1 6.1 DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Zephyr
    ® JANUARY 13, 2014 CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR Effective ® CHICAGO – and – SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA Enjoy the journey. 1-800-USA-RAIL Call CHICAGO - BURLINGTON - OMAHA DENVER - GLENWOOD SPRINGS SALT LAKE CITY - RENO - SACRAMENTO SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA and intermediate stations AMTRAK.COM Visit NRPC Form P5–175M–1/13/14 Stock #02-3628 Schedules subject to change without notice. Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corp. National Railroad Passenger Corporation Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR 5 Train Number 6 CALIFORNIA ZEPHYR ROUTE MAP and SYMBOLS Daily Normal Days of Operation Daily R s r R s r ark, CO er, UT On Board Service z, CA , UT ton, IL ramento, CA , NV o rege, NEcoln, NE y l y l Emeryville,Martine CA Sac Colfax, CAReno Elko, NVProv Green RivGlenwoodFraser-Winter Springs,Fort CO Morgan, P Hold COLin Creston, Ottumwa,IA Burlington, IA Prince IA Chicago, IL O Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up , UT C r, CO eola, IA Davis, CAeville, CA Helper, UT Granby, Denve Osc easant, IA l2 00P 0DpChicago, IL–Union Station (CT) ∑w- Ar l2 50P Richmond, CA Ros Truckee, CA McCook,Hastings, NE NEOmaha, NE Galesburg,Naperville, IL IL Winnemucca,Salt Lake NV City Grand Junction, CO Mount Pl R2 34P 28 Naperville, IL (METRA/BN Line) ∑v- D1 43P 3 44P 104 Princeton, IL > D12 23P 4 38P 162 Galesburg, IL -S. Seminary St. &¶ ∑w- D11 31A 5 25P 205 Burlington, IA >v 10 36A ∑v 5 59P 233 Mount Pleasant, IA 9 54A CHICAGO 6 53P 279 Ottumwa, IA ∑v 9 09A EMEEMERYVILLERYVVIL 8 09P 359 Osceola, IA (Des Moines) >v- 7 40A 8 41P 392 Creston, IA >v 7 04A l10 55P 500 Ar Omaha, NE ∑v Dp l5 14A l11 05P Dp Ar l4 59A l12 08A 555 Ar Lincoln, NE ∑v Dp l3 26A l12 14A Dpp Ar l3 20A California Zephyr® l1 47A 652 Hastings, NE (Grand Island) ∑v l1 42A Other Amtrak Train Routes 2 34A 706 Holdrege, NE >v 12 54A 3 43A 783 McCook, NE (CT) >v 11 49P A Time Symbol for A.M.
    [Show full text]
  • (2019) 1 WSU Five-Year Graduate Program Review Self-Study Cover Page Department/Program
    WSU Five-Year Graduate Program Review Self-Study Cover Page Department/Program: Master of Science in Athletic Training Semester Submitted: Fall 2019 Self-Study Team Chair: Matthew Donahue Self-Study Team Members: Valerie Herzog, Conrad Gabler, Hannah Stedge, Alysia Cohen Contact Information: Matthew Donahue PhD LAT ATC Program Director, Master of Science in Athletic Training Associate Professor Weber State University Department of Athletic Training 3992 Central Campus Drive, Dept 3504 Ogden, UT 84408-3504 Information Regarding Current Review Team Members: WSU Faculty member outside the program within DHCP: Kenton J. Cummins, MHA, MLS(ASCP)CM Medical Laboratory Sciences University Pre-PA Advisor Weber State University Work: (801)626-6718 [email protected] Sally Cantwell, PhD, RN Associate Chair, Annie Taylor Dee School of Nursing Associate Professor Weber State University Work: (801) 626-7858 [email protected] Faculty member outside WSU: Dani Moffit PhD LAT ATC Program Director, Master of Science in Athletic Training Sport Science & Physical Education 921 South 8th Ave. Stop 8105 Pocatello, ID 83209 [email protected] WSU Graduate Program Review Form (2019) 1 A. Brief Introductory Statement The Master of Science in Athletic Training (MSAT) program at Weber State University is accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE). This accreditation is awarded following the submission of a detailed self- study document as well as an on-campus site visit. This program received its initial accreditation with zero citations in March 2010, and was reaccredited in November 2014. In almost every state, in order to work as an Athletic Trainer, one must graduate from an accredited AT program and pass the Board of Certification (BOC) exam for Athletic Trainers.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Audit Advises Tooele County to Tighten Its Internal Controls
    Grantsville Elementary students step back in time to learn history at Colonial Day Faire TOOELE See B1 TRANSCRIPT S T C BULLETIN S THURSDAY November 29, 2018 www.TooeleOnline.com Vol. 125 No. 52 $1.00 Independent audit advises Tooele County to tighten its internal controls County’s financial position deemed good, yet audit points out weaknesses in procedures and financial statements TIM GILLIE first time, according to Skeen. FRANCIE AUFDEMORTE/TTB PHOTO STAFF WRITER “That’s now booked,” he The Oquirrh Mountains are obscured by inversion and smog that settled over Tooele Valley during a previous winter. Wood and coal burning Tooele County ended the said. restrictions to help reduce pollution began on Nov. 1 and will continue until March 1. year in a good financial posi- The auditors also made tion, but a new independent adjustments to the 2016 state- auditor wants the county to ments based on the new rule change how it keeps records so the prior year’s statements Winter’s inversion usher in and prepares financial state- would be comparable to the ments to comply with account- 2017 statement, according to ing standards. Skeen. That’s what the 2017 inde- But more serious than the county wide burn restrictions pendent audit report said. change in accounting stan- Paul Skeen, audit partner dards were four material weak- with the Salt Lake office of nesses in accounting processes Eide Bailly accounting firm, disclosed by the audit, Skeen Wood and coal burning presented the audit findings said. restriction season and financial statements for A material weakness is a 2017 to the county commission deficiency, or a combination started Nov.
    [Show full text]
  • VENUECONNECT 2013 ATTENDEES As of 11/12/2013
    VENUECONNECT 2013 ATTENDEES as of 11/12/2013 FULL_NAME COMPANY CITY STATE/ PROVINCE COUNTRY Aaron Hurt Howard L. Schrott Arts Center Indianapolis IN Abbie Jo Vander Bol Show Me Center Cape Girardeau MO Adam Cook Rexall Place & Edmonton Expo Centre Edmonton AB Canada Adam Saunders Robert A. (Bob) Bowers Civic Center Port Arthur TX Adam Sinclair American Airlines Center Dallas TX Adam Straight Georgia Dome Atlanta GA Adina Alford Erwin The Fox Theatre - Atlanta Atlanta GA Adonis Jeralds Charlotte Coliseum Charlotte NC Adrian Collier University Center Mercer University Macon GA Adrian Moreno West Cal Arena Sulphur LA AJ Boleski INTRUST Bank Arena/SMG Wichita KS AJ Holzherr Birmingham CrossPlex Birmingham AL Al Diaz McAllen Auditorium & Convention Center McAllen TX Al Karosas Bryce Jordan Center Penn State University University Park PA Al Rojas Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center Dallas TX Alan Freeman Louisiana Superdome & New Orleans Arena New Orleans LA Albert Driscoll Halifax Forum Community Association Halifax NS Albert Milano Strategic Philanthropy, LLC Dallas TX Alberto Galarza Humacao Arena & PAC Humacao PR Alexander Diaz Madison Square Garden New York NY Alexis Berggren Dolby Theatre Hollywood CA Allen Johnson Orlando Venues/Amway Center Orlando FL Andrea Gates-Ehlers UIC Forum Chicago IL Andrew McQueen Leflore County Civic Center/ Argi-Center Greenwood MS Andrew Thompson Harborside Event Center Fort Myers FL Andy Gillentine University of South Carolina Columbia SC Angel Mitchell Ardmore Convention Center Ardmore OK Angie Teel
    [Show full text]
  • EEO Annual Public File Report
    KUEN (UNIVERSITY OF UTAH) EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT (June 1, 2020 thru May 31, 2021) This report describes the recruitment sources that KUEN used to fill full-time vacancies. FULL-TIME POSITIONS FILLED WITH RECRUITMENT SOURCES USED Appendix A of this report includes a list of recruitment sources and referral agencies, indicating source name, address, contact person, and telephone number. Hiree Recruitment Sources are noted in parentheses. Asterisk (*) denotes referral sources and their respective numbers found on Appendix A. KUEN sends information regarding full-time positions to a mailing list maintained by the station’s technical staff. This list is open to any subscriber so the list of individuals and/or organizations that receive information about job postings may be broader than the referral source list in Appendix A. An invitation is sent to these subscribers asking if they will provide more contact information, but some do not respond. 1. KUEN IT Projects Manager PRN23587B Notice sent to Referral Source list for entries on or before 6/23/20* Date Filled: 9/1/20 Number of Interviewees: 12 Interviewees according to Referral Source: *B6=3; B7=4; C43=5 Hiree: *B7 2. KUEN Sr IT Architect PRN24008B Notice sent to Referral Source list for entries on or before 8/7/20; additional advertising: local package Date Filled: 10/26/20 Number of Interviewees: 3 Interviewees according to Referral Source: *B7=2; C43=1 Hiree: *B7 3. KUEN Project Administrator PRN24151B Notice sent to Referral Source list for entries on or before 8/21/20* Date Filled: 10/19/20 Number of Interviewees: 13 Interviewees according to Referral Source: *B6=3; B7=1; C43=9 Hiree: *C43 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-20 Weber State Men's Basketball
    2019-20 WEBER STATE MEN’S BASKETBALL WeberStateSports.com • Facebook: WeberStateMBB • Twitter/Instagram: @WeberStateMBB GAME #24 2019-20 Wildcat Schedule NORTHERN ARIZONA AT Overall: 9-14 Big Sky: 5-7 WEBER STATE Home: 5-4 Home: 2-3 Saturday, Feb. 8, 2020 • 7 p.m. Away: 3-6 Away: 2-4 Ogden, UT • Dee Events Center Neutral: 0-4 NORTHERN TV: ..........................................................none WEBER Date Opponent Time/Result ARIZONA Online: .......PLUTO TV 535, WatchBigSky.com STATE 11/08 at Utah State L 34-89 LUMBERJACKS Radio: ..............KLO 1430 AM / kloradio.com WILDCATS 11/14 San Diego L 56-71 Live stats: .................WeberStateSports.com 11/19 West Coast Baptist W 130-50 (13-8, 7-5) Series: .................... Weber State leads 81-29 (9-14, 5-7) 11/25 ^ vs. Wright State L 57-72 Streak: ....................... Northern Arizona 1 win 11/26 ^ vs. Murrary State L 68-69 In Ogden: .................. Weber State leads 46-9 This season:...1/4/20 - Flagstaff - NAU 72-64 11/27 ^ vs. Northeastern L 69-79 12/04 at Utah Valley W 72-67 GAME INFORMATION 12/07 Westcliff W 86-46 After an historic night in a win Thursday, Weber State is right back home Saturday night 12/14 + vs. Utah L 49-60 for another Big Sky game as the Wildcats host Northern Arizona. Tipoff will be at 7 p.m. 12/17 Bethesda W 109-62 at the Dee Events Center. It will be streamed online on Pluto TV 535 and WatchBigSky. 12/21 at BYU L 61-91 com with Wildcat radio broadcast on 1430 KLO and kloradio.com.
    [Show full text]
  • 720 Light Rail Time Schedule & Line Route
    720 light rail time schedule & line map To Central Pointe View In Website Mode The 720 light rail line (To Central Pointe) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) To Central Pointe: 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM (2) To Fairmont: 5:12 AM - 11:27 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 720 light rail station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 720 light rail arriving. Direction: To Central Pointe 720 light rail Time Schedule 7 stops To Central Pointe Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:17 AM - 8:17 PM Monday 6:17 AM - 11:47 PM Fairmont Station 2206 S Mcclelland St, Salt Lake City Tuesday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM Sugarmont Station Wednesday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM 2201 S 900 E, Salt Lake City Thursday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM 700 East Station Friday 5:27 AM - 11:42 PM 2200 S 700 E, Salt Lake City Saturday 6:17 AM - 11:47 PM 500 East Station 2229 S 440 E, Salt Lake City 300 East Station 2233 S 300 E, Salt Lake City 720 light rail Info Direction: To Central Pointe South Salt Lake City Station Stops: 7 55 E Central Point Pl, South Salt Lake Trip Duration: 9 min Line Summary: Fairmont Station, Sugarmont Central Pointe Station Station, 700 East Station, 500 East Station, 300 East 2212 S West Temple St, South Salt Lake Station, South Salt Lake City Station, Central Pointe Station Direction: To Fairmont 720 light rail Time Schedule 7 stops To Fairmont Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:02 AM - 8:02 PM Monday 6:02 AM - 11:32 PM Central Pointe Station 2212 S West Temple St, South Salt Lake Tuesday 5:12 AM - 11:27 PM South Salt
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Meeting of the Utah State Board of Regents To
    AGENDA MEETING OF THE UTAH STATE BOARD OF REGENTS TO BE HELD AT REGENTS’ OFFICES, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH September 13-14, 2007 Utah State Board of Regents Office of the Commissioner of Higher Education Board of Regents Building, The Gateway 60 South 400 West Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1284 STATE BOARD OF REGENTS MEETING REGENTS’ OFFICES, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH SEPTEMBER 2007 AGENDA Thursday, September 13 9:00 a.m. - REGENTS’ EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Executive Session) 11:00 a.m. Library, 5th Floor 12:00 noon LUNCH Conference Room Foyer, Lobby Level 1:00 p.m. - COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE 1:15 p.m. Regents’ Board Room, Lobby Level 1. Welcome and Overview of Meeting 2. Administration of Oath of Office to Regent Patti Harrington 1:15 p.m. - MEETINGS OF BOARD COMMITTEES 3:30 p.m. PROGRAMS COMMITTEE (Regent Katharine B. Garff, Chair) Commissioner’s Board Room, 5th Floor ACTION: 1. Weber State University – Master of Science Degree in Nursing Tab A 2. Weber State University – Mission and Role Statement Tab B 3. Dixie State College – Bachelor of Science Degree in Aviation Management/Adult Degree Tab C Completion Program 4. Dixie State College – Associate Degree in Early Childhood Education Tab D CONSENT: 5. Consent Calendar, Programs Committee Tab E A. University of Utah – Confucius Institute B. Weber State University – Graduate Certificate in Quality & Lean Manufacturing C. University of Utah – Degree Three-Year Follow-up Reports INFORMATION/DISCUSSION: 6. Information Calendar, Programs Committee Tab F A. Salt Lake Community College – Program Reviews B. Programs Under Consideration/Development FINANCE, FACILITIES AND ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE (Regent Jerry C.
    [Show full text]
  • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR of DEVELOPMENT WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY Ogden, Utah Weber State University
    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT WEBER STATE UNIVERSITY Ogden, Utah Weber State University The Aspen Leadership Group is proud to partner with Weber State University in the search for an Executive Director of Development. The Executive Director of Development will provide leadership for all aspects of major gift fundraising including the establishment, coordination, and implementation of fundraising goals and strategies for the university. In partnership with the Vice President of University Advancement, the Executive Director of Development will develop and implement annual fundraising operating plans as well as oversee a team of talented frontline fundraisers. Founded in 1889, Weber State University (WSU) is an exceptional teaching university providing associate, baccalaureate, and master degree programs in liberal arts, sciences, technical, and professional fields. Encouraging freedom of expression and valuing diversity, the university provides excellent educational experiences for students through extensive personal contact among faculty, staff, and students in and out of the classroom. Through academic programs, research, artistic expression, public service, and community-based learning, the university serves as an educational, cultural, and economic leader for the region. WSU is classified as a Master’s L institution under the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. The university offers more than 250 undergraduate certificate and degree programs and 16 graduate degrees. Serving nearly 30,000 students, drawn predominately from Utah but also including representatives from all 50 states and 47 foreign countries, WSU takes pride in its student-centered environment that meets the needs of both traditional and nontraditional students. WSU graduates are broadly educated, capable, and prepared for meaningful careers, graduate, and professional schools and civic engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • College Admission Requirements Info Weber State University
    College Admission Requirements Info Weber State University http://www.weber.edu/Admissions/apply.html Application Process 1. Fill out the online application. 2. Pay a $30 application fee. 3. Submit the following: o Official high school transcripts or GED documentation o ACT/SAT scores (these aren't mandatory. They help determine math and English placement) o Official transcripts from any college or university where you have completed work including concurrent enrollment and early college. University of Utah http://admissions.utah.edu/apply/undergraduate/freshman.php Application Process 1. Check the deadlines 2. Apply (Need ACT scores) 3. Pay the application fee ($30) 4. Have your transcripts sent to the Office of Admissions 5. Have your ACT (or SAT) scores sent to the Office of Admissions 6. Track your status online Utah State University http://www.usu.edu/admissions/freshmen/apply.cfm Deadlines - Spring 2015 application closes December 16, 2014 • Fall Semester: April 1 • Spring Semester: October 1 • Summer Semester: April 1 View Scholarship Deadlines Required Materials • Application (online or paper) • Application fee ($40 nonrefundable, $55 if late) • High school transcript or GED • ACT or SAT scores (may be waived for applicants 25 and older) • Concurrent enrollment transcripts Academic Requirements • 2.5 high school GPA or 656 Total GED (550 Battery Average prior to 2014) • 17 ACT or 820 SAT (does not include the writing portion) • 90 Index score • If your academic work does not meet this standard, your application will be considered on an individual basis for potential admission into a 2-year general studies program. High School Prep Coursework Fast Track Your Application • Submit an online application and pay the application fee.
    [Show full text]
  • Zellerbach Development Parking Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
    Zellerbach Development Parking Study TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Date: August 16, 2016 To: Adam Siegman, Watt Investment Partners From: Richard Brockmyer, AICP, Fehr & Peers Subject: Parking Space Study for Zellerbach Development UT15-1085 Introduction This memorandum reports the results of a parking study performed for the Zellerbach Development located in South Salt Lake, Utah. When complete, the development, as proposed, will consist of 293 dwelling units. In total, the current proposed parking ratio for the development is 1.47 spaces per unit. For comparative analysis, national parking generation rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) are presented as well as the Urban Land Institute (ULI), followed by a comparison of South Salt Lake City parking requirements with those of surrounding cities. Finally, the Fehr & Peers recommended number of parking spaces required for the Zellerbach Development are presented. National Parking Demand Rates In order to compare the results of the local parking demand study, the parking demand for the development was estimated using national data published by ITE. This data was obtained from ITE, Parking Generation Manual, 4th Edition. Table 2 shows the projected parking demand. Based on the ITE average peak parking demand for Low/Midrise Apartments, the Zellerbach Development would need to provide a minimum total of 360 parking spaces. Table 2 National Parking Generation (ITE) Land Use Number of Units Average Peak Period Peak Parking Parking Demand Ratio Demand Low/Mid Rise Apartment (221) 293 1.23 360 Parking demand for the development was also estimated using the ULI, Shared Parking 2nd Edition. Table 3 shows the projected parking demand.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting the Medical Management Requirements of Large Scale Mass Casualty Events Using Computer Simulation Scott A
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 2-27-2009 Predicting the Medical Management Requirements of Large Scale Mass Casualty Events Using Computer Simulation Scott A. Zuerlein University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Zuerlein, Scott A., "Predicting the Medical Management Requirements of Large Scale Mass Casualty Events Using Computer Simulation" (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/105 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Predicting the Medical Management Requirements of Large Scale Mass Casualty Events Using Computer Simulation by Scott A. Zuerlein A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Health Policy and Management College of Public Health University of South Florida Major Professor: Alan M. Sear, Ph.D. Barbara L. Orban, Ph.D. James Studnicki, Sc.D. Yiliang Zhu, Ph.D. Date of Approval: February 27, 2009 Keywords: computer modeling, simulation, blasts, planning, emergency care, care processes, health system preparedness, health system resources ©Copyright 2009, Scott A. Zuerlein Table of Contents
    [Show full text]