Dispute Between

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dispute Between DISPUTE BETWEEN BARBADOS AND THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO REFERRED TO ARBITRATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANNEX VII UNCLOS BY NOTIFICATION OF BARBADOS DATED 16 FEBRUARY 2004 REJOINDER VOLUME 1 ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUTED PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 287, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH ANNEX VII OF THE UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA In the Matter of an Arbitration Between BARBADOS and the REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Index to the Rejoinder of the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago Page Number CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 The Issues between the Parties 2 The Record of Negotiations between the Parties 4 CHAPTER2 Jurisdiction and Admissibility 12 A Introduction 12 B Issues of fact raised by Barbados in respect of the 12 commencement of the arbitration c Trinidad and Tobago's objections to jurisdiction and 17 admissibility (1) Barbados' Failure to Comply with Necessary Pre-Conditions 18 to Arbitration under Part XV Page Number (2) Part XV of the 1982 Convention and the Requirement of 22 Good Faith (3) The Scope of Barbados' Application 24 CHAPTER3 The Distinction between the Two Sectors: Geographical 26 Fact and Geographical Fiction ( 1) The Difference between the Caribbean and Atlantic Sectors 28 (2) The Open Character of the Atlantic Sector 29 (3) Opposite and Adjacent Coasts 31 CHAPTER4 The Western Sector A Introduction 35 B Barbadians have fished off the island of Tobago since the late 35 1970s c International Law and the Barbadian Claim in the Western 45 Sector (1) Barbados misrepresents the Nature and Effect of the Dealings 46 between Itself and Trinidad and Tobago regarding fisheries (a) Trinidad and Tobago has not refused Barbadian fishing 48 vessels access to the waters off Tobago (b) Trinidad and Tobago has not acknowledged that 50 Barbados has "traditional fishing rights" off Tobago 2 Page Number (c ) Barbados made no "consistent claim" to the areas off 51 Tobago which it now claims as its own (2) The Position taken by Barbados in its Reply is contrary to the 58 1982 Convention, the Relevant Jurisprudence and State Practice (a) "Barbados' nationals acquired non-exclusive rights to 59 engage in traditional artisanal fishing which rights survive the establishment of new maritime zones" (b) " UNCLOS, general principles of law, customary 63 international law and international human rights law all mandate the survival of traditional artisanal fishing rights notwithstanding reclassification of maritime zones formerly part of the high seas" (c) " Adjustment of the median line to ensure the ability of 67 Barbados' fisherfolk to continue to exercise their rights would be appropriate and consistent with UNCLOS" ((d) "The judgements in Qatar/Bahrain and 68 Cameroon/Nigeria do not cast doubt on the relevance of artisanal fishing rights to maritime boundary delimitation" D Conclusion 69 CHAPTERS The Eastern or Atlantic Sector A The Basis for Trinidad and Tobago's Claim in the Eastern 71 Sector B Synopsis of Arguments and Responses as to the Atlantic 72 Sector C Delimitation in the Eastern or Atlantic Sector: The issues of 77 principle ( 1) Delimitation within 200 n.m. of the coasts of the Parties 77 3 Page Number (a) Jurisdiction and admissibility 77 (i) Jurisdiction in principle over areas within 200 n.m. 77 (ii) The scope of the dispute and the issue of exchange 79 of views (iii) The position of third States 83 (b) Barbados' arguments based on estoppel and 84 acquiescence ( c ) Relevant circumstances 89 (i) The oil practice 89 (ii) Coastal frontages 90 (iii) Non-encroachment 93 (iv) The regional dimension 95 (v) Overview of relevant circumstances 100 (d) Barbados Argument for the Priority of EEZ over 101 Continental Shelf (e) Conclusion as to delimitation within 200 n.m. of the 105 coasts of either Party (2) Delimitation beyond 200 n.m. 106 (a) Extent of Tribunal's competence and admissibility of 106 Trinidad and Tobago's claim 4 Page Number (b) The merits of the delimitation in relation to the outer 108 continental shelf D Delimitation in the Eastern or Atlantic Sector: The method of 109 Delimitation (a) Delimitation within 200 n.m. 109 (i) Relevant Coasts 109 (ii) Location of the turning point 110 (iii) Direction of the proposed delimitation line 112 (b) Delimitation beyond 200 n.m. from the coasts of either 115 Party ( c ) The equity of the overall solution 116 E Conclusion 116 Chapter 6 Conclusions and Submissions 117 5 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION The present Rejoinder is submitted in accordance with the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal and Procedural Order No. 2. Its purpose is not to repeat the arguments already set out in full in the Counter-Memorial but to respond to fresh points made in the Reply of Barbados filed on 9 June 2005. 2 That Reply was considerably longer than the Memorial of Barbados and was couched in the somewhat aggressive terms which have (regrettably) characterised Barbados' pleadings and letters to the Tribunal throughout these proceedings. Both of these features are surprising. 3 It is Barbados that chose to initiate these proceedings on a unilateral basis with no suggestion to Trinidad and Tobago that the two States might agree upon recourse to arbitration. Barbados took this step after several years of negotiations in which Trinidad and Tobago had made quite clear all of the basic features of the case which it now advances. 1 Barbados' claim in the Caribbean sector, by comparison, was not advanced as an official position, or in any detail, or with any serious indication as to its extent prior to the present proceedings; it did indeed come new-minted with the Memorial. However, Barbados must be presumed to have known its own case before it put pen to paper, even if it had not chosen to share that knowledge with Trinidad and Thus, the Joint Reports of the five rounds of maritime boundary negotiations which are reviewed in Chapter 2 of the Counter-Memorial show that Trinidad and Tobago always made plain (1) that it considered that the two States were partially in a situation of oppositeness and partially one of adjacency, (2) that in the Atlantic sector, where the two coastlines were adjacent rather than opposite, the median line did not produce an equitable result as required by Articles 74 and 83 of UNCLOS, (3) that Trinidad and Tobago was entitled to an extended continental shelf and should not be cut off from the 200 mile line by Barbados, (4) that the boundary line in the Atlantic sector should lie to the north of the median line and (5) that (when this issue was belatedly raised) it did not accept that the record of fishing activities by Barbadians- such as it was-justified an "adjustment" of the boundary so as to bring it south of the median line. These points were all made clear with reference to the legal basis for the positions taken, and the claims of Trinidad and Tobago were illustrated on a detailed map. 1 Tobago. It is therefore difficult to see why Barbados could not have set out its arguments in the normal detail in its first round pleading. The Issues between the Parties 4 The length of the Barbadian Reply should not be allowed to conceal the fact that there are only four principal issues in these proceedings: ( 1) whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction and, if it has, what are the limits of that jurisdiction; (2) whether the obvious geographical differences between the western, or Caribbean, sector and the eastern, or Atlantic, sector produce legal consequences in terms of the location of the boundary; (3) whether Barbados has made out its claim- in fact and in law to the areas which it claims south of the median line in the western, or Caribbean, sector; and (4) whether Trinidad and Tobago is entitled to the boundary line which it claims in the eastern, or Atlantic, sector. 5 In Trinidad and Tobago's submission, the Reply for all its length contains little which could not - and should not - have been said in Barbados' Memorial. Only in respect of the first issue does the Reply deal with an issue which Barbados could not have been expected to address earlier;2 even then, only a brief response is now needed. Trinidad and Tobago's response to Barbados' reply on the issue of jurisdiction is set out in Chapter 2 of this Rejoinder. Trinidad and Tobago accepts, of course, that the arguments on jurisdiction were not known to Barbados prior to the receipt of the Counter-Memorial. 2 6 On the second issue, Barbados has treated the Tribunal to a virtuoso display of the cartographer's art in which islands are rotated on their axes and the boundaries of places as far from the disputed area as West Africa and the North Sea are redrawn in a colourful - and avowedly fictitious manner. All of this is done in an attempt to discredit a perfectly simple proposition, namely that the maritime areas to the west of Barbados and Trinidad and Tobago are different from the areas to their east and that there is no justification in the eastern sector for treating the two coastlines as opposite and thus producing a manifestly inequitable result. But the artistry cannot mask the geographical reality, still less can it justify the result which it produces. Trinidad and Tobago has already set out its case on the relevant sectors and relevant coasts in Chapter 5 of its Counter-Memorial. Chapter 3 of the present Rejoinder will add a fairly brief response to the points made in the Reply on this subject. 7 In the final chapter of its Reply, Barbados makes a half-hearted attempt to shore up its claim to the whole of the continental shelf and EEZ around the north and west of the island of Tobago.
Recommended publications
  • Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean
    Integrated Country Strategy Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean FOR PUBLIC RELEASE FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Table of Contents 1. Chief of Mission Priorities ................................................................................................................ 2 2. Mission Strategic Framework .......................................................................................................... 3 3. Mission Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................................... 5 4. Management Objectives ................................................................................................................ 11 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE Approved: August 15, 2018 1 FOR PUBLIC RELEASE 1. Chief of Mission Priorities Our Mission is accredited bilaterally to seven Eastern Caribbean (EC) island nations (Antigua and Barbuda; Barbados; Dominica; Grenada; St. Kitts and Nevis; St. Lucia; and St. Vincent and the Grenadines) and to the Organization of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS). All are English- speaking parliamentary democracies with stable political systems. All of the countries are also Small Island Developing States. The U.S. has close ties with these governments. They presently suffer from inherently weak economies, dependent on tourism, serious challenges from transnational crime, and a constant threat from natural disasters. For these reasons, our engagement focuses on these strategic challenges: Safety, Security, and Accountability for American Citizens and Interests Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Barbados' Debt Crisis: the Effects of Colonialism and Neoliberalism
    University at Albany, State University of New York Scholars Archive Latin American, Caribbean, and U.S. Latino Latin American, Caribbean, and U.S. Latino Studies Honors Program Studies 2019 Barbados’ Debt Crisis: The Effects of Colonialism and Neoliberalism Noel Chase University at Albany, State University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/lacs_honors Part of the Latin American Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Chase, Noel, "Barbados’ Debt Crisis: The Effects of Colonialism and Neoliberalism" (2019). Latin American, Caribbean, and U.S. Latino Studies Honors Program. 4. https://scholarsarchive.library.albany.edu/lacs_honors/4 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Latin American, Caribbean, and U.S. Latino Studies at Scholars Archive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Latin American, Caribbean, and U.S. Latino Studies Honors Program by an authorized administrator of Scholars Archive. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Barbados’ Debt Crisis: The Effects of Colonialism and Neoliberalism Faculty Sponsor Address: [email protected] | University at Albany Social Science 250 1400 Washington Avenue Albany, NY 12222 Undergraduate Author Address: [email protected] | 159 E 88th St Brooklyn, NY 11236 1 This research project explains the correlation between the tourism sector and Barbados’s cycle of debt. Barbados has continuously incurred debt, from international financing institutions such as the International Monetary Fund, since its independence from Great Britain in 1966. As of 2017, the estimated national debt of Barbados is $7.92 billion (USD).1 Sir Hillary Beckles, Michael Howard, and other economic experts and professors at the University of the West Indies, believe the country has gone into debt for a variety of different reasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbados High Commission
    H.E. Mr. Guy Hewitt High Commissioner for Barbados to the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Mr Tom Tugendhat, MP Chair Foreign Affairs Select Committee House of Commons London, SW1A 0AA 09 April 2018 Dear Chair, I write to request an opportunity for the victims, migration and human rights advocates, High Commissioners, and other concerned groups to have an interaction with members of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee on the situation facing some elderly Commonwealth-born residents in the UK. I write in part as a product of the Commonwealth as I was born in the UK to parents from India and Barbados. The situation is that these migrants from the Caribbean, and other Commonwealth countries, many of whom have been here since childhood, now, due to their irregular status, face the possibility of destitution, detention, and deportation. Based on information received from Migration Observatory at Oxford University we estimate there could be up to 50,000 Commonwealth-born persons in the UK who arrived before 1971 but do not have regularised status. The situation started with the call from Britain in the 1950s and 1960s to journey here to address labour shortages. Having left the Caribbean for the “Mother Country” as British Subjects, as the islands were still colonies, and having secured leave to remain and subsequently being educated, skilled, worked, taxed and levied in the UK, it never occurred to them that they were not legally British. The situation changed markedly in 2012, when the Home Office began systematic immigration checks. The real issue is that these long-term undocumented UK residents are not treated as anomalies to be regularised, but as “illegal immigrants” and barred from working and refused access to government services: the denial of NHS treatment, and loss of welfare benefits including housing benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Intercaribbean Timetable of New Eastern Caribbean Flights
    interCaribbean Timetable of New Eastern Caribbean Flights Summer 2020 FLT # FROM TO START DATE END DATE FREQUENCY DEP ARR JY712 Barbados Dominica 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Mon Wed Fri Sun 8:55 AM 9:55 PM JY752 Barbados Dominica 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Tue Thu Sat 3:15 PM 4:15 PM JY756 Barbados Grenada 11-Aug-20 30-Sep-20 Tue Thu Sat 6:25 PM 7:20 PM JY714 Barbados Grenada 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Tue Thu Sat 9:00 AM 9:55 AM JY754 Barbados Grenada 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Mon Wed Fri Sun 3:20 PM 4:15 PM JY734 Barbados St Lucia 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Daily 12:20 PM 1:05 PM JY760 Barbados St Lucia 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Daily 6:40 PM 7:25 PM JY713 Dominica Barbados 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Mon Wed Fri Sun 10:30 AM 11:30 AM JY753 Dominica Barbados 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Tue Thu Sat 4:50 PM 5:50 PM JY711 Grenada Barbados 11-Aug-20 30-Sep-20 Wed Fri Sun 11:05 AM 12:00 PM JY715 Grenada Barbados 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Tue Thu Sat 10:30 AM 11:25 AM JY755 Grenada Barbados 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Mon Wed Fri Sun 4:50 PM 5:45 PM JY705 St Lucia Barbados 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Daily 7:20 AM 8:05 AM JY735 St Lucia Barbados 11-Aug-20 31-Oct-20 Daily 1:40 PM 2:25 PM Winter 2020/2021 FLT # FROM TO START DATE END DATE FREQUENCY DEP ARR JY758 Barbados Dominica 01-Oct-20 31-Oct-20 Mon Wed Fri 6:25 PM 7:25 PM JY712 Barbados Dominica 01-Nov-20 13-Mar-21 Daily 8:55 AM 9:55 AM JY752 Barbados Dominica 01-Nov-20 13-Mar-21 Daily 3:15 PM 4:15 PM JY758 Barbados Dominica 01-Oct-20 31-Oct-20 Mon Wed Fri 6:25 PM 7:25 PM JY756 Barbados Grenada 01-Oct-20 31-Oct-20 Tue Thu Sat Sun 6:25 PM 7:20 PM JY714 Barbados Grenada
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations Towards the Opening of the British Virgin Islands to Tourism Table of Contents
    Policy Report 1: Considerations towards the opening of the British Virgin Islands to tourism Table of contents How to use this document .............................................................................................. 14 01 Potential epidemiological scenarios ............................................................ 15 1.1. Short introduction to the scenarios faced globally ......................... 15 1.2. Anticipating the different scenarios ........................................................ 19 1.2.1. Indicators and thresholds ................................................................. 20 1.3. Scenarios in the case of vaccine availability ....................................... 25 02 Country Roadmaps: COVID19 control measures and their socio-economic impact ...................................................................................... 26 2.1. Non-pharmacological control measures ...............................................26 2.2. Pharmacological control measures ....................................................... 34 2.2.1. Vacciness .............................................................................................. 34 Considerations regarding access .............................................. 35 Who to prioritize ................................................................................ 35 2.2.2. Perspectives on profilaxis .............................................................. 36 Potential demand ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize British Overseas Territories (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Isla
    UNHCR staff monitoring programmes attheLoveAChild field hospital in Fond Parisien, Haiti. Antigua and Barbuda Bahamas Barbados Belize British overseas territories (Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Turks and Caicos Islands, Montserrat) Canada Dominica Dominican Republic Dutch overseas territories in the Caribbean (Aruba, Curaçao, Saint Maarten, Bonaire, Saint Eustatius, Saba) French overseas departments (Martinique, Guadeloupe) Grenada Guyana Haiti Jamaica St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent and the Grenadines Suriname Trinidad and Tobago United States of America 348 UNHCR Global Report 2010 and the OPERATIONAL HIGHLIGHTS l UNHCR continued to seek the political and financial l More than 80 per cent of UNHCR’s global resettlement support of the Governments of the United States and referrals are to the United States and Canada. Canada in order to fulfil its protection mandate and find comprehensive solutions for refugees. Working environment l In the United States, UNHCR sought to ensure that the country’s laws and policies, as well as their implementation, In the United States, the Government has confirmed its were in accordance with its obligations under the 1967 commitment to international obligations, particularly with Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. Specifically, regard to the parole of asylum-seekers. However, UNHCR promoted reforms to the way in which the refugee adjudications by the immigration courts and administrative definition is being applied under US law and monitored the and federal
    [Show full text]
  • Barbados 2020 Human Rights Report
    BARBADOS 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Barbados is a parliamentary democracy led by Prime Minister Mia Mottley of the Barbados Labour Party. The Barbados Labour Party won all 30 parliamentary seats in the 2018 election. A former Barbados Labour Party member of Parliament became an independent in order to serve as the formal leader of the opposition. Queen Elizabeth II is the head of state and is represented by the governor general, who certifies all legislation on her behalf. The Royal Barbados Police Force is responsible for domestic law enforcement, including migration and border enforcement. The police and all other law enforcement agencies report to the attorney general. The Barbados Defence Force protects national security and may be called upon to maintain public order in times of crisis, emergency, or other specific needs. The defense force reports to the minister of defense and security. The law provides that the police may request defense force assistance with special joint patrols. Civilian authorities maintained effective control over the police and defense forces. There were no reports that the security forces committed any serious abuses. Significant human rights issues included: trafficking in persons, and the criminalization of consensual same-sex sexual conduct between adults. Authorities did not enforce the law on same-sex sexual conduct during the year. The government had mechanisms in place to identify and punish officials who may commit human rights abuses. Section 1. Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom from: a. Arbitrary Deprivation of Life and Other Unlawful or Politically Motivated Killings There were no reports the government or its agents committed arbitrary or unlawful killings.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of HMG's Responses to the Montserrat Volcanic
    EVALUATION REPORT EV635 December 1999 reports An Evaluation of HMG’s Response to the Montserrat Volcanic Emergency Volume I By Edward Clay, Christine Barrow, Charlotte Benson, Jim Dempster, Peter Kokelaar, Nita Pillai, John Seaman Pakistan Health Planning SECTION The former Overseas Development Administration (ODA) became the Department for International Development (DFID) in May 1997. References in this report to the ODA apply to events and actions prior to this change. The opinions expressed in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department for International Development. Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME I Prefacei Forewordiii List of Abbreviations & Acronymsv Figure 1 Montserrat at the end of 1998 and a chronology of volcanic events and evacuations ix Figure 2 Bramble Airport and the Volcano, November 1998 x SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS AND KEY LESSONS1 1.INTRODUCTION 11 2.THE SOUFRIÈRE HILLS ERUPTION SINCE 1995 AND ITS IMPACT 15 2.1 Background 15 2.2 The eruption of the Soufrière Hills Volcano 15 2.3 Impacts of the volcano 16 3.HMG’S RESPONSE: JULY 1995 - OCTOBER 1998 19 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 Initial crisis: July-September 1995 20 3.3 Waiting on the volcano: September 1995-June 1997 20 3.4 Volcanic crisis: June-September 1997 21 3.5 Moving from emergency to reconstruction and sustainable development 22 3.6 Resources 23 3.7 The components of HMG’s response 23 4.RISK MANAGEMENT: SCIENTIFIC MONITORING AND PROTECTING LIVES AND HEALTH 25 4.1 A reactive strategy 25 4.2 Disaster preparedness
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level Rise and Land Use Planning in Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, and Pará
    Water, Water Everywhere: Sea Level Rise and Land Use Planning in Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, and Pará Thomas E. Bassett and Gregory R. Scruggs © 2013 Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Lincoln Institute of Land Policy Working Paper The findings and conclusions of this Working Paper reflect the views of the author(s) and have not been subject to a detailed review by the staff of the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Contact the Lincoln Institute with questions or requests for permission to reprint this paper. [email protected] Lincoln Institute Product Code: WP13TB1 Abstract The Caribbean and northern coastal Brazil face severe impacts from climate change, particularly from sea-level rise. This paper analyses current land use and development policies in three Caribbean locations and one at the mouth of the Amazon River to determine if these policies are sufficient to protect economic, natural, and population resources based on current projections of urbanization and sea-level rise. Where policies are not deemed sufficient, the authors will address the question of how land use and infrastructure policies could be adjusted to most cost- effectively mitigate the negative impacts of climate change on the economies and urban populations. Keywords: sea-level rise, land use planning, coastal development, Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago, Guyana, Pará, Brazil About the Authors Thomas E. Bassett is a senior program associate at the American Planning Association. He works on the Energy and Climate Partnership of the Americas grant from the U.S. Department of State as well as the domestic Community Assistance Program. Thomas E. Bassett 1030 15th Street NW Suite 750W Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-349-1028 Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Gregory R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Barbados/Trinidad & Tobago Arbitration
    THE BARBADOS/TRINIDAD & TOBAGO ARBITRATION The Law of Maritime Delimitation: Back to the Future by ∗ Bernard H. Oxman [A]rbitration, while expected to take into account the special circumstances calling for modification of the major principle of equidistance, is not contemplated as arbitration ex aequo et bono. That major principle must constitute the basis of the arbitration, conceived as settlement on the basis of law, subject to reasonable modifications necessitated by the special circumstances of the case.1 The Award that is the subject of this volume is the first determination of a maritime boundary between States in a dispute submitted pursuant to the compulsory jurisdiction provisions of Section 2 of Part XV of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (“the Convention” or “UNCLOS”).2 It was rendered by a unanimous arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of UNCLOS, comprised of five members of great distinction and experience in international law and international dispute resolution, including the law of the sea in general and maritime boundaries in particular. The panel was presided over by the former president of the International Court of Justice, Stephen M. Schwebel,3 and included ∗ Richard A. Hausler Professor of Law, University of Miami School of Law; Faculty Chair of the Law School’s Master of Laws Program in Ocean Law and Coastal Law. 1 II YEARBOOK OF THE INTERNATIONAL LAW COMMISSION p. 216, para. 82 (1953) (commenting on the equidistance/special circumstances rule of delimitation contained in its draft articles on the continental shelf), cited in Maritime Delimitation in the Area between Greenland and Jan Mayen (Den.
    [Show full text]
  • BARBADOS,SAINT LUCIA & Theoecs
    Joint SDG Fund | Leave No one Behind through Social Protection in BARBADOS,SAINT LUCIA & theOECS April 2020 THE JOINT PROGRAMME IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN – ENSURING PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS TO ADAPTIVE SOCIAL PROTECTION © UNDP © Leave No One Behind Social protection refers to policies and programmes aimed at preventing and Current situation The Caribbean is the most indebted protecting people against poverty, region in the world and highly vulnerable vulnerability and social exclusion over to large-scale shocks including economic the course of their lives. These include a crises, public health emergencies, wide range of interventions, such as 1 million displacement and climate-related social assistance, social insurance as well people highly vulnerable disasters. In the last four decades, as supporting people’s skills and access to impact of shocks Eastern Caribbean countries have to jobs. suffered USD22 billion in damages as a US$3 billion direct result of natural disasters. The United Nations Children’s Fund est. losses due to (UNICEF), the World Food Programme disasters annually In a region where one in four people (WFP), the International Labour (24%) live in poverty, with a poverty rate Organization (ILO), the United Nations that is even higher among children Development Programme (UNDP) and 1 in 4 (33%), no one should be left behind and UN Women have come together under people live in poverty face such events without adequate the Joint Programme “Enhancing and 1 in 3 children social protection. Resilience and Acceleration of the _________________________________ Sustainable Development Goals in the Eastern Caribbean: Universal Adaptive 4 countries People are more vulnerable to Social Protection”.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean
    UNDP Barbados and the Eastern Caribbean Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, British Virgin Islands, Dominica, Grenada, Montserrat, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Support to the National Response and Recovery to Contain the Impact of COVID-19 1- Government Response Governments of the Caribbean have been actively deploying national responses to the threat of this deadly virus in the POST COVID-19: Now that the number of COVID-19 active context of already challenged fiscal realities, physical cases has stabilized/been reduced; the priorities have shifted infrastructure and service delivery systems. As these countries’ towards the economic recovery post-COVID-19 and economies are not sufficiently diversified and rely on tourism, preparations of the impending hurricane season. foreign direct investment and trade for their growth, the massive slow-down in output and imports will amplify the first Varying economic stimulus packages have been rolled out order effects of the disease in the region. The pandemic’s across the region with common focus on social welfare combined impact is therefore likely to not only be widespread, expansion, boosting agriculture, job creation and affecting virtually all aspects of the economies, but to continue enhancement of support systems for Micro, Small and well after the population has recovered from the physical Medium enterprises. As governments resort to fiscal stimulus health symptoms of the disease. In the case of most countries measures to keep their economies afloat, COVID-19 will only in the Eastern Caribbean, the impact of the virus will reinforce add to this region’s debt burden.
    [Show full text]