DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix H. Vegetation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix H. Vegetation Assessment Section 49 Development Application – TB2SP Appendix H. Vegetation Assessment Tailem Bend Solar Project - Stage 2 Equis Energy (Australia) Pty Ltd Ecological Assessment Report IW133300-0000-NE-EAR Rev 4 19/12/2017 V egetati on Re por t S nowy Hydr o Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved A 18/08/2017 Draft Report for Technical Review R. Barratt Z. Bull L. Daddow 0 21/08/2017 Draft Report for Client Review R. Barratt L. Daddow L. Daddow 1 13/10/2017 Final Report for Equis R. Barratt L. Daddow - 2 16/11/2017 Final Report updated R. Barratt Z. Bull - 3 14/12/2017 Revised Final Report for Equis R. Barratt A Horan/Z Bull L. Daddow 4 19/12/2017 Minor editorial updates R. Barratt L Daddow L. Daddow Ecological Assessment Report – TB2SP Tailem Bend Solar Project - Stage 2 Project No: IW133300 Document Title: Ecological Assessment Report – TB2SP Revision: Rev 4 (Final) Date: 19/12/2017 Client Name: Equis Energy (Australia) Pty Ltd Project Manager: Lara Daddow Author: Rick Barratt, Andrew Boyd Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Level 6, 30 Flinders Street Adelaide SA 5000 Australia T +61 8 8113 5400 F +61 8 8113 5440 www.jacobs.com © Copyright 2016 Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Limitation: This report has been prepared on behalf of, and for the exclusive use of Equis Energy Australia, and is subject to, and issued in accordance with, the provisions of the contract between Jacobs and the Client. Jacobs accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for, or in respect of, any use of, or reliance upon, this report by any third party. i Ecological Assessment Report – TB2SP Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations.........................................................................................................................iii 1. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................2 2. Legislation ............................................................................................................................................4 2.1 Commonwealth Legislation ....................................................................................................................4 2.1.1 Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.............................................................4 2.2 South Australian Legislation ...................................................................................................................4 2.2.1 National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 ......................................................................................................4 2.2.2 Native Vegetation Act 1991 ....................................................................................................................4 2.2.3 Natural Resources Management Act 2004 .............................................................................................5 2.3 South Australian policies and plans ........................................................................................................5 2.3.1 No Species Loss - A Nature Conservation Strategy for South Australia 2007-2017 (DEH, 2007) .............5 2.3.2 Guidelines for the Management of Roadside Vegetation .........................................................................5 3. EPBC Act Protected Matters Summary ...............................................................................................6 4. BDBSA summary .................................................................................................................................8 5. Methodology.........................................................................................................................................9 6. Results................................................................................................................................................ 10 6.1 Overview.............................................................................................................................................. 10 6.2 Cleared Land ....................................................................................................................................... 12 6.3 Remnant Native Vegetation Patches .................................................................................................... 12 6.3.1 Block A (site 1) ..................................................................................................................................... 12 6.3.2 Block A (site 2) ..................................................................................................................................... 13 6.3.3 Block A (site 3) ..................................................................................................................................... 14 6.3.4 Block B (site 1) ..................................................................................................................................... 15 6.3.5 Block B (site 2) ..................................................................................................................................... 16 6.4 Scattered Native Trees......................................................................................................................... 17 6.5 Planted Exotic and Non-indigenous Native Trees ................................................................................. 18 7. Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 20 7.1 Disturbance Levels and Vegetation Condition ....................................................................................... 20 7.2 Threatened Species and Threatened Ecological Communities (TEC) ................................................... 22 7.3 Clearance of Native Vegetation ............................................................................................................ 23 7.4 Justification for application of Exemption 12 (34) .................................................................................. 23 8. Summary ............................................................................................................................................ 25 9. References ......................................................................................................................................... 26 Appendix A. Flora species observed during field visit Appendix B. Scattered Tree Details ii Ecological Assessment Report – TB2SP Acronyms and Abbreviations AC Alternating Current BCM Bushland Condition Monitoring BDBSA Biological Database of South Australia DEWNR Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Equis Equis Energy (Australia) MNES Matters of National Environmental Significance MDBSA Murray Darling Basin South Australia MW Megawatt MWAC Megawatts Alternating Current NPW Act National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 NRM Act Natural Resources Management Act 2004 NV Act Native Vegetation Act 1991 NVC Native Vegetation Council NVMU Native Vegetation Management Unit TB2SP Tailem Bend Solar Project Stage 2 TEC Threatened Ecological Communities TSSC Threatened Species Scientific Committee iii Ecological Assessment Report – TB2SP Important note about your report The sole purpose of this report and the associated services performed by Jacobs was to provide details regarding vegetation present and clearance required for the proposed solar project at Tailem Bend, South Australia, in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract between Jacobs and the client, Equis Energy (Australia) Pty Ltd (Equis). That scope of services, as described in this report, was developed by Jacobs. In preparing this report, Jacobs has relied upon, and presumed accurate, any information (or confirmation of the absence thereof) provided by the Client and / or from other sources (e.g. DEWNR). Except as otherwise stated in the report, Jacobs has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of any such information. If the information is subsequently determined to be false, inaccurate or incomplete then it is possible that our observations and conclusions as expressed in this report may change. Jacobs derived the data in this report from information available in the public domain at the time or times outlined in this report. The passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions or impacts of future events may require further examination of the project and subsequent data analysis, and re-evaluation of the data, findings, observations and conclusions expressed in this report. Jacobs has prepared this report in accordance with the usual care and thoroughness of the consulting profession, for the sole purpose described above and by reference to applicable standards, guidelines, procedures and practices at the date of issue of this report. For the reasons outlined above, however, no other warranty or guarantee, whether expressed or implied, is made as to the data, observations and findings expressed in this report, to the extent permitted by law. This report should be read in full and no excerpts are to be taken as representative of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve
    FINAL REPORT 2019 Canna Reserve This project was supported by NACC NRM and the Shire of Morawa through funding from the Australian Government’s National Landcare Program Canna Reserve BioBlitz 2019 Weaving and wonder in the wilderness! The weather may have been hot and dry, but that didn’t stop everyone having fun and learning about the rich biodiversity and conservation value of the wonderful Canna Reserve during the highly successful 2019 BioBlitz. On the 14 - 15 September 2019, NACC NRM together with support from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions and the Shire of Morawa, hosted their third BioBlitz at the Canna Reserve in the Shire of Morawa. Fifty professional biologists and citizen scientists attended the event with people travelling from near and far including Morawa, Perenjori, Geraldton and Perth. After an introduction and Acknowledgement of Country from organisers Jessica Stingemore and Jarna Kendle, the BioBlitz kicked off with participants separating into four teams and heading out to explore Canna Reserve with the goal of identifying as many plants, birds, invertebrates, and vertebrates as possible in a 24 hr period. David Knowles of Spineless Wonders led the invertebrate survey with assistance from, OAM recipient Allen Sundholm, Jenny Borger of Jenny Borger Botanical Consultancy led the plant team, BirdLife Midwest member Alice Bishop guided the bird survey team and David Pongracz from Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions ran the vertebrate surveys with assistance from volunteer Corin Desmond. The BioBlitz got off to a great start identifying 80 plant species during the first survey with many more species to come and even a new orchid find for the reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279060093 Nomination for Listing of Iron Grass (Lomandra effusa – L. multiflora ssp. dura) Tussock Grassland as a Threatened Ecological Community under the Environmental Protection and Biodi... Technical Report · January 2000 CITATIONS READS 0 7 1 author: Richard J.-P. Davies University of NSW 68 PUBLICATIONS 207 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Goodenia asteriscus (Goodeniaceae), a new arid zone species form north-western South Australia an eastern Western Australia. View project All content following this page was uploaded by Richard J.-P. Davies on 20 March 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Nomination for listing of Iron Grass (Lomandra ejfusa - L. multiflora ssp. dura) Tussock Grassland as a threatened ecological community under the Environment Protection and BiodiversityConservation Act 1999 Report prepared for WWF Australia by Richard Davies , 2000 Ecological Community Details Generally accepted name of the ecological community Iron Grass (Lomandra ejjusa-L. multiflora ssp. dura) Tussock Grassland. This community was initially referred to as Lomandra multiflora - L. dura association in · Wood (193 7) & Jessup (1948). It was subsequently referred to as Lomandra dura - L. ejjusa Tussock Grassland/Sedgeland in Specht (1972, 1974), and Lomandra effi1sa ± L. dura Tussock Grassland/Sedgeland in Davies (1982) and Neagle (1995). More recently Hyde (1995) and Robertson (1998) undertook floristic analysis of floristic quadrats sampled throughout the native grassland and grassy woodland areas in the Lofty Block Bioregion Consequently, Hyde (1995) split Iron Grass (Lomandra ejjusa - L.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron-Grass Natural Temperate Grassland Nationally Listed As Critically Endangered
    Department for Environment and Heritage Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland nationally listed as Critically Endangered Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland, Mokota Conservation Park (Photograph by Tim Bond) Description The Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland of South Australia is a grassland dominated by Iron- grasses (Lomandra multiflora ssp. dura and/or Lomandra effusa), with tussock-forming (clumping) grasses, low shrubs and a range of other native plants in the ground layer. Trees and tall shrubs are generally absent or very sparse (less than 10% cover). Distribution Iron-grass Grasslands are unique to South Australia. Their main distribution is on the slopes and hills of the Mount Lofty Ranges, west of the River Murray and throughout the Mid North (see adjacent map). Patches also occur on the eastern side of the River Murray near Tailem Bend, and may occur along the Hummocks Range north of the Gulf St Vincent. Conservation Status The Iron-grass Natural Temperate Grassland of South Australia is nationally listed as a critically endangered ecological community under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Your comments are valued. Conservation Act 1999. To provide comments or information in the Major threats to this community include development of the recovery plan for this clearance and fragmentation, inappropriate ecological community, please contact: grazing regimes, and weed invasion. Jean Turner Grassy Ecosystems Recovery Project DEH, 3/17 Lennon St, Clare 5453 Ph: (08) 8841 3451 Email:- [email protected] Department for Environment and Heritage SPECIES FOUND IN IRON-GRASS GRASSLAND Some Commonly Occurring Species: Scented Mat-rush Hard Mat-rush Crested Spear-grass Brush Wire-grass Lomandra effusa Lomandra multiflora ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Conservation Division Annual Research Report 2016–17 Acknowledgements
    Department of Parks and Wildlife Science and Conservation Division annual research report 2016–17 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Science and Conservation, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (formerly the Department of Parks and Wildlife). Photo credits listed as ‘DBCA’ throughout this report refer to the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions. For more information contact: Executive Director, Science and Conservation Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions 17 Dick Perry Avenue Kensington Western Australia 6151 Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre Western Australia 6983 Telephone (08) 9219 9943 dbca.wa.gov.au The recommended reference for this publication is: Department of Parks and Wildlife, 2017, Science and Conservation Division Annual Research Report 2016–2017, Department of Parks and Wildlife, Perth. Images Front cover: Pilbara landscape. Photo – Steven Dillon/DBCA Inset: Burning tree. Photo - Stefan Doerr/Swansea University; Plant collecting. Photo – Juliet Wege/DBCA; Dibbler Photo – Mark Cowan/DBCA Back cover: Flatback turtle Photo – Liz Grant/DBCA Department of Parks and Wildlife Science and Conservation Division Annual Research Report 2016–2017 Director’s Message Through 2016-17 we continued to provide an effective science service to support the Department of Parks and Wildlife’s corporate goals of wildlife management, parks management, forest management and managed use of natural assets. In supporting these core functions, we delivered best practice science to inform conservation and management of our plants, animals and ecosystems, and to support effective management of our parks and reserves, delivery of our fire program and managed use of our natural resources, as well as generating science stories that inspire and engage people with our natural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee South Australia
    A BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE MURRAY MALLEE SOUTH AUSTRALIA Editors J. N. Foulkes J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section Heritage and Biodiversity Division Department for Environment and Heritage, South Australia 2000 The Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia was carried out with the assistance of funds made available by the Commonwealth of Australia under the National Estate Grants Programs and the State Government of South Australia. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Australian Heritage Commission or the State Government of South Australia. This report may be cited as: Foulkes, J. N. and Gillen, J. S. (Eds.) (2000). A Biological Survey of the Murray Mallee, South Australia (Biological Survey and Research, Department for Environment and Heritage and Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts). Copies of the report may be accessed in the library: Environment Australia Department for Human Services, Housing, GPO Box 636 or Environment and Planning Library CANBERRA ACT 2601 1st Floor, Roma Mitchell House 136 North Terrace, ADELAIDE SA 5000 EDITORS J. N. Foulkes and J. S. Gillen Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001 AUTHORS D. M. Armstrong, J. N. Foulkes, Biological Survey and Research Section, Heritage and Biodiversity Branch, Department for Environment and Heritage, GPO Box 1047 ADELAIDE SA 5001. S. Carruthers, F. Smith, S. Kinnear, Geographic Analysis and Research Unit, Planning SA, Department for Transport, Urban Planning and the Arts, GPO Box 1815, ADELAIDE SA 5001.
    [Show full text]
  • Nanya Station, Western New South Wales Vegetation, Flora and Fauna
    NANYA STATION, WESTERN NEW SOUTH WALES VEGETATION, FLORA AND FAUNA Prepared by Martin E. Westbrooke, Centre for Environmental Management, University of Ballarat Nanya Station, owned and managed by the University of Ballarat was purchased with assistance from the Department of Environment and Heritage. Ongoing management is supported by the Lower Murray Darling Catchment Management Authority FOREWORD 1 FOREWORD This booklet has been prepared as an introduction for visitors to Nanya. Nanya is managed for conservation, research and teaching and affords protection to highly significant environments including two endangered communities and seventeen endangered or vulnerable species. On your visit, please respect these values. NANYA STATION Nanya Station is located in the Scotia country of far western New South Wales and consists of the Nanya Western Lands Pastoral Lease 3281 – Perpetual Leasehold Lot 1244 in Deposited Plan 762778, Parish of Winnebaga, County of Tara. Nanya Homestead complex 2 BACKGROUND The Scotia region has one of the shortest stock grazing histories of western NSW. Along with five other properties, Nanya was created as a pastoral lease in 1927. Previously the area was part of the large Lake Victoria lease and stock grazing occurred only in wet years (Withers 1989). The original lease was taken up by Gordon Cummings in 1927. He first dug a dam near the southeast corner of the property. A larger ground tank and homestead at the site of the present complex was later established. An area around the homestead was cleared and cropped to provide feed for the horses used in digging the earth tanks. The ruins of the original building are located between the shearing shed and Homestead Tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Synemon Species)
    Action Statement Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 No. 146 Five threatened Victorian Sun- moths (Synemon species) Description and distribution The Sun-moths (family Castniidae) are Female sun-moths mate and commence considered to have a Gondwanan origin as they oviposition shortly after emergence from their occur in the Neotropical, Australian and Oriental pupae as all of their eggs are fully matured regions. The Australian species are all placed in during the pupal stage. They have long, the single genus Synemon, containing 20 retractable ovipositors that are used to deposit described and 22 undescribed species (E. D. their eggs beneath the soil, at or near the base Edwards pers. comm.). of their larval food plants. After hatching, the larvae tunnel to the food plants roots or Sun-moths are broad-winged, colourful, day- rhizomes and commence feeding. Prior to flying moths with clubbed antennae and pupation each larva constructs a vertical, silk- relatively slender bodies. Their diurnal habits lined tunnel to just below the soil surface from are so strong that if passing clouds block out which the empty pupal casing protrudes after the sunshine they will immediately settle and the adult moth has emerged. not take flight again (unless disturbed) until sunlight returns. They usually fly rapidly, It is not known how long any of the Victorian within a metre of the ground and keep their sun-moths take to complete their life cycles. wings in motion continuously. When Sun-moths However, Common and Edwards (1981) found rest for short periods they often raise and lower that Synemon magnifica, a species that occurs their wings rhythmically, showing their brightly in New South Wales, takes two to three years to coloured hindwings.
    [Show full text]
  • Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey 73
    Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey Figure 13.Vegetation associations identified across the proposed Palmer Wind Farm project area – Area A. 73 Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey Figure 14. Vegetation associations identified across the proposed Palmer Wind Farm project area – Area B. 74 Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey Figure 15. Vegetation associations identified across the proposed Palmer Wind Farm project area – Area C. 75 Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey Figure 16. Vegetation conditions identified across the proposed Palmer Wind Farm project area – Area A. 76 Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey Figure 17. Vegetation conditions identified across the proposed Palmer Wind Farm project area – Area B. 77 Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey Figure 18. Vegetation conditions identified across the proposed Palmer Wind Farm project area – Area C. 78 Palmer Wind Farm Flora and Fauna Survey Association 1: +/- Callitris gracilis (Southern Cypress Pine) +/- Melaleuca lanceolata (Dryland Tea-tree) +/- Allocasuarina verticillata (Drooping Sheoak) +/- Eucalyptus socialis (Red Mallee) Mixed Woodland / Mallee. Table 22. Summary of vegetation association 1. Common native overstorey and Allocasuarina verticillata (Drooping Sheoak), Beyeria lechenaultii (Pale midstorey species Turpentine Bush), Bursaria spinosa ssp. spinosa (Sweet Bursaria), Callitris gracilis (Southern Cypress Pine), Eucalyptus socialis (Red Mallee), Melaleuca lanceolata (Dryland Tea-tree). Common native understorey Acrotriche patula (Prickly Ground-berry),
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin, Kadji Kadji, Karara, Lochada Reserves WA
    BUSH BLITZ SPECIES DISCOVERY PROGRAM Charles Darwin Reserve WA 3–9 May · 14–25 September · 7–18 December 2009 Kadji Kadji, Karara, Lochada Reserves WA 14–25 September · 7–18 December 2009 What is Contents Bush Blitz? Bush Blitz is a four-year, What is Bush Blitz 2 multi-million dollar Summary 3 partnership between the Abbreviations 3 Australian Government, Introduction 4 BHP Billiton, and Earthwatch Reserves Overview 5 Australia to document plants Methods 8 and animals in selected properties across Australia’s Results 10 National Reserve System. Discussion 12 Appendix A: Species Lists 15 Fauna 16 This innovative partnership Vertebrates 16 harnesses the expertise of many Invertebrates 25 of Australia’s top scientists from Flora 48 museums, herbaria, universities, Appendix B: Rare and Threatened Species 79 and other institutions and Fauna 80 organisations across the country. Flora 81 Appendix C: Exotic and Pest Species 83 Fauna 84 Flora 85 2 Bush Blitz survey report Summary Bush Blitz fieldwork was conducted at four National Reserve System properties in the Western Australian Avon Wheatbelt and Yalgoo Bioregions during 2009. This included a pilot study Abbreviations at Charles Darwin Reserve and a longer study of Charles Darwin, Kadji Kadji, Lochada and Karara reserves. Results include 651 species added to those known across the reserves and the discovery of 35 putative species new to science. The majority of ANHAT these new species occur within the heteroptera (plant bugs) and Australian Natural Heritage Assessment lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) taxonomic groups. Tool Malleefowl (Leipoa ocellata), listed as vulnerable under the EPBC Act federal Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 (EPBC Act), were observed on Charles Darwin Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension Hill Magnetite Project
    Survey of Proposed Drill Lines in Tenement M59/339 at Extension Hill 14th August 2013 For Extension Hill Pty Ltd: Extension Hill Magnetite Project Surveyed by Jennifer Borger1 , assisted by Ian Nicholls2 1. Botanical Consultant 13 Pipers Place, Kalamunda WA 6076 Ph: 0427998403 ABN: 2. Ian Nicholls Site Field Assistant Extension Hill Pty Ltd. Extension Hill Magnetite Project PO Box 82, West Perth, WA 6872 Contents Page 1. Background 3 2. Climate 3 3. Regional Vegetation 3 4. Threatened and Priority Species 4 5. Survey methodology 5 6. Results 7 6.1 Flora of Conservation Significance 7 6.2 Vegetation Communities 10 7. Relevant Legislation and Compliance with Recognised Standards 14 8. References 15 Appendix 1: Flora recorded from the survey area 16 Appendix 2: GPS coordinates of Conservation Significant Flora 19 Appendix 3: Conservation codes 20 Table 1: Flora of Conservation Significance recorded from within 20km 4 Table 2: GPS coordinates for the proposed drill lines 5 Figure 1: Location of Proposed Drill Lines 6 Figure 2: Location of flora of conservation significance 8 Figure 3: Persoonia pentasticha 9 Figure 4: Regrowth on sandplain 10 Figure 5: Vegetation communities on the rocky ridge landform 12 Figure 6: York gum open woodland 13 2 1. Background Extension Hill Pty Ltd proposes to drill exploration holes in Tenement M59/339 in the North Extension Hill area in the Midwest region of Western Australia, approximately 85 km east of Perenjori, and immediately east of the Great Northern Highway. Previous surveys in the area recorded four threatened flora (T) including Darwinia masonii, Eucalyptus synandra, Acacia imitans and Lepidosperma gibsonii.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Slopes Revegetation Guide
    ot etSoe Rvgtto Guide South West Slopes Revegetation ot etSoe Rvgtto Guide South West Slopes Revegetation from little things big things grow... SouthSouth WestWest SlopesSlopes RevegetationRevegetation GuideGuide (south of the Murrumbidgee River) 1998 from little things big things grow... South West Slopes Revegetation Guide (SOUTH OF THE MURRUMBIDGEE RIVER) Edited by Fleur Stelling Murray Catchment Management Committee & Department of Land & Water Conservation Albury, NSW March 1998. With a major contribution by Karen Walker Greening Australia, Wagga Wagga, NSW. foreword John Landy he South West Slopes region of New South introduced species of plants and animals and grazing T Wales runs from the Riverina plains to the have all played a part in the decline in biodiversity of mountains in the east, with an elevation of up to native vegetation. This book provides useful material 600 metres. It is one of the most extensively altered for those seeking to control weeds, attract wildlife to landscapes in this country. The most radical the farm dam, or reintroduce native grasses and modification has been on the lower slopes and plains, pasture. The practical information sheets will also be where the establishment of pastures and crops was valuable in many aspects of land management. most easily achieved. Clearing of the catchments in the rising country, mainly during the last century — has Many farmers in the South West Slopes region (and resulted in eroded streams and silt deposition, the latter elsewhere in the country) have struggled under encouraged by the widespread growing of willows. increasingly adverse conditions. My family has a property in the south-east, near Tooma, and we have Preserving the remaining areas of bushland that have had to step up our fight against weeds (notably the so far escaped a significant decline in biodiversity is blackberry), which infests pasture and modified clearly a priority, and several chapters in this Guide bushland alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene Ndhf Thomas J
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 4 2006 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Sean W. Graham University of British Columbia Marc A. McPherson University of Alberta; Duke University Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Givnish, Thomas J.; Pires, J. Chris; Graham, Sean W.; McPherson, Marc A.; Prince, Linda M.; Patterson, Thomas B.; Rai, Hardeep S.; Roalson, Eric H.; Evans, Timothy M.; Hahn, William J.; Millam, Kendra C.; Meerow, Alan W.; Molvray, Mia; Kores, Paul J.; O'Brien, Heath W.; Hall, Jocelyn C.; Kress, W. John; and Sytsma, Kenneth J. (2006) "Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Authors Thomas J. Givnish, J. Chris Pires, Sean W. Graham, Marc A. McPherson, Linda M. Prince, Thomas B. Patterson, Hardeep S. Rai, Eric H. Roalson, Timothy M. Evans, William J. Hahn, Kendra C. Millam, Alan W. Meerow, Mia Molvray, Paul J. Kores, Heath W. O'Brien, Jocelyn C. Hall, W. John Kress, and Kenneth J. Sytsma This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 4 Aliso 22, pp.
    [Show full text]