DOCSLIB.ORG

Development of House Boat Facilities Camps on PPP Model at Various

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Development of House Boat Facilities Camps on PPP Model at Various Sector Specific Inventory & Institutional Strengthening for PPP Mainstreaming - Tourism Department DEVELOPMENT OF HOUSEBOAT FACILITIES ON PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP MODEL AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN KARNATAKA PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY REPORT APRIL 2012 One state. Many worlds. Sector Specific Inventory & Institutional Strengthening for PPP Mainstreaming - Tourism Department DISCLAIMER The information in this Report has been prepared based on information collected from secondary sources. Wherever information was not readily available, reasonable assumptions have been made, in good faith to draw meaningful inferences and these have been mentioned in the respective sections of the report. All such assumptions are subject to further corroboration based on availability of information. The information and analysis presented in this Report is not and does not purport to be comprehensive or to have been independently verified. This report has been prepared by Feedback Infrastructure Private Limited for its client, Infrastructure Development Department (IDD) for its use for furthering the project. No external agency shall use any part of this report without the prior permission from IDD. The information contained in this Report is selective and is subject to updating, expansion, revision and amendment. It does not, and does not purport to, contain all the information that may be required. This Report includes certain statements, estimates, projections and forecasts. Such statements, estimates, projections, targets and forecasts are based on reasonable assumptions made by the management, officer and employees of Feedback Infrastructure Private Limited. Assumptions and the base information on which they are made may or may not prove to be correct. No representation or warranty is given as to the reasonableness of forecasts or the assumptions on which they may be based and nothing in this Report is, or should be relied on as, a promise, representation or warranty. PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 Sector Specific Inventory & Institutional Strengthening for PPP Mainstreaming - Tourism Department CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary .............................................................................................................. 8 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 9 2.1 Assignment Background ........................................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Need of the Assignment ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Objective and Scope of Work ............................................................................................................ 10 2.3.1 Strategic Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 10 2.3.2 Detailed Scope of Work ............................................................................................................... 10 2.4 The Present Deliverable ...................................................................................................................... 11 3 Approach and Methodology for Present Deliverable ............................................. 12 3.1 Approach ................................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Methodology ............................................................................................................................................ 13 3.2.1 Project Preparation and Conceptualization ...................................................................... 13 3.2.2 Preliminary Financial Viability and Impact Assessment ............................................. 14 3.2.3 Implementation Framework ..................................................................................................... 14 4 Tourism Sector Profile ...................................................................................................... 16 4.1 An Overview of the state ..................................................................................................................... 16 4.1.1 General Overview ........................................................................................................................... 16 4.1.2 Economic Overview ....................................................................................................................... 17 4.1.3 Tourism Sector Overview............................................................................................................ 19 4.2 Tourism Scenario in the State ........................................................................................................... 20 4.2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 20 4.2.2 Key Tourist Destinations ............................................................................................................. 21 4.2.2.1 Popular Tourist Destinations ......................................................................................... 22 4.2.3 Tourist Circuits ................................................................................................................................ 22 4.2.3.1 Northern Circuit .................................................................................................................. 22 4.2.3.2 Southern Circuit ................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.3.3 Coastal Circuit ...................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.3.4 Wild Life Circuit ................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.3.5 Hill Resort Circuit ................................................................................................................ 24 4.2.4 Trends in Tourist Arrival ............................................................................................................ 24 PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY STUDY 3 Sector Specific Inventory & Institutional Strengthening for PPP Mainstreaming - Tourism Department 4.2.5 Strengths and Weaknesses of Karnataka as a Tourist Destination ........................ 25 4.2.6 Initiatives by the Department of Tourism .......................................................................... 26 5 Project Brief .......................................................................................................................... 28 5.1 Project Concept ....................................................................................................................................... 28 5.2 Case Studies on Similar Concepts .................................................................................................... 28 5.2.1 Case Study – Kerala Houseboats ............................................................................................. 28 5.2.2 Case Study – Kashmir Houseboats ......................................................................................... 29 5.3 Identified Project Locations .............................................................................................................. 30 5.4 Project Site Description ....................................................................................................................... 31 5.4.1 An Overview of Udupi District .................................................................................................. 31 5.4.1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 31 5.4.1.2 Location & Connectivity .................................................................................................... 31 5.4.1.3 Demography .......................................................................................................................... 32 5.4.1.4 Economy.................................................................................................................................. 32 5.4.1.5 Tourism Resource ................................................................................................................ 32 5.4.2 Project Location Details .............................................................................................................. 32 5.4.2.1 Location 1: Udupi Backwaters ....................................................................................... 32 5.4.2.2 Location 2: Maravanthe Backwaters .......................................................................... 33 5.4.2.3 Location 3: Brahmavar Backwaters ............................................................................ 33 5.4.3 Issues and Concerns ...................................................................................................................... 34 6 Market Assessment ............................................................................................................. 35 6.1 Industry Outlook .................................................................................................................................... 35 6.2 Opportunities & Demand Assessment .........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Live Storage Capacities of Reservoirs As Per Data of : Large Dams/ Reservoirs/ Projects (Abstract)
    LIVE STORAGE CAPACITIES OF RESERVOIRS AS PER DATA OF : LARGE DAMS/ RESERVOIRS/ PROJECTS (ABSTRACT) Completed Under Construction Total No. of No. of No. of Live No. of Live No. of Live No. of State/ U.T. Resv (Live Resv (Live Resv (Live Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of Storage Resv (Live Total No. of cap data cap data cap data capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs capacity cap data Reservoirs not not not (BCM) available) (BCM) available) (BCM) available) available) available) available) Andaman & Nicobar 0.019 20 2 0.000 00 0 0.019 20 2 Arunachal Pradesh 0.000 10 1 0.241 32 5 0.241 42 6 Andhra Pradesh 28.716 251 62 313 7.061 29 16 45 35.777 280 78 358 Assam 0.012 14 5 0.547 20 2 0.559 34 7 Bihar 2.613 28 2 30 0.436 50 5 3.049 33 2 35 Chhattisgarh 6.736 245 3 248 0.877 17 0 17 7.613 262 3 265 Goa 0.290 50 5 0.000 00 0 0.290 50 5 Gujarat 18.355 616 1 617 8.179 82 1 83 26.534 698 2 700 Himachal 13.792 11 2 13 0.100 62 8 13.891 17 4 21 J&K 0.028 63 9 0.001 21 3 0.029 84 12 Jharkhand 2.436 47 3 50 6.039 31 2 33 8.475 78 5 83 Karnatka 31.896 234 0 234 0.736 14 0 14 32.632 248 0 248 Kerala 9.768 48 8 56 1.264 50 5 11.032 53 8 61 Maharashtra 37.358 1584 111 1695 10.736 169 19 188 48.094 1753 130 1883 Madhya Pradesh 33.075 851 53 904 1.695 40 1 41 34.770 891 54 945 Manipur 0.407 30 3 8.509 31 4 8.916 61 7 Meghalaya 0.479 51 6 0.007 11 2 0.486 62 8 Mizoram 0.000 00 0 0.663 10 1 0.663 10 1 Nagaland 1.220 10 1 0.000 00 0 1.220 10 1 Orissa 23.934 167 2 169 0.896 70 7 24.830 174 2 176 Punjab 2.402 14
    [Show full text]
  • KALASA-BANDURI PROJECT (States) a Day After the Centre's
    KALASA‐BANDURI PROJECT (States) A day after the Centre’s notification of the Mahadayi inter‐State water dispute tribunal award, Chief Minister B.S. Yediyurappa said on Friday that the State government would expedite the Kalasa‐Banduri nala drinking water and hydro power projects in the region. Kalasa‐Banduri project was planned in 1989; Goa raised an objection to it. Kalasa‐Banduri Nala Project is undertaken by the Government of Karnataka to improve drinking water supply to the three districts of Belagavi, Dharwad, and Gadag. It involves building across Kalasa and Banduri, two tributaries of the Mahadayi river to divert water to the Malaprabha river (a tributary of Krishna river). Malaprabha river supplies the drinking water to Dharwad, Belgaum, and Gadag districts. The cost of the Kalasa‐Banduri Nala project on the Mahadayi basin has risen from about ` 94 crores (2000) to `1,677.30 crores (2020) due to the ongoing inter‐State river water dispute. Mahadayi or Mhadei, the west‐flowing river, originates in Bhimgad Wildlife Sanctuary (Western Ghats), Belagavi district of Karnataka. It is essentially a rain‐fed river also called Mandovi in Goa. It is joined by a number of streams to form the Mandovi which is one of two major rivers (the other one is Zuari river) that flows through Goa. The river travels 35 km in Karnataka; 82 km in Goa before joining the Arabian Sea. The Mahadayi Water Disputes Tribunal was set up in 2010. Goa, Karnataka and Maharashtra are parties to the tribunal. MISSION PURVODAYA (States) Purvodaya in steel sector is aimed at driving accelerated development of Eastern India through establishment of integrated steel hub.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated State Water Plan for Lower Bhima Sub Basin (K-6) of Krishna Basin
    Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Pune. Chief Engineer (S.P) W.R.D Pune. Integrated state water Plan for Lower Bhima Sub basin (K-6) of Krishna Basin Osmanabad Irrigation Circle, Osmanabad K6 Lower Bhima Index INDEX CHAPTER PAGE NO. NAME OF CHAPTER NO. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 0 1.1 Need and principles of integrated state water plan. 1 1.2 Objectives of a state water plan for a basin. 1 1.3 Objectives of the maharashtra state water policy. 1 1.4 State water plan. 1 1.5 Details of Catchment area of Krishna basin. 2 1.6 krishna basin in maharashtra 2 1.7 Location of lower Bhima sub basin (K-6). 2 1.8 Rainfall variation in lower Bhima sub basin. 2 1.9 Catchment area of sub basin. 3 1.10 District wise area of lower Bhima sub basin. 3 1.11 Topographical descriptions. 5 1.11 Flora and Fauna in the sub basin. 6 2.0 RIVER SYSTEM 2.1 Introduction 11 2.2 Status of Rivers & Tributaries. 11 2.3 Topographical Description. 11 2.4 Status of Prominent Features. 12 2.5 Geomorphology. 12 2.6 A flow chart showing the major tributaries in the sub basin. 13 3.0 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 3.1 Geology. 16 3.1.1 Introduction. 16 3.1.2 Drainage. 16 3.1.3 Geology. 16 3.1.4 Details of geological formation. 17 K6 Lower Bhima Index 3.2 Soils 18 3.2.1 Introduction. 18 3.2.2 Land capability Classification of Lower Bhima Sub Basin (K6).
    [Show full text]
  • Mehendale Book-10418
    Tipu as He Really Was Gajanan Bhaskar Mehendale Tipu as He Really Was Copyright © Gajanan Bhaskar Mehendale First Edition : April, 2018 Type Setting and Layout : Mrs. Rohini R. Ambudkar III Preface Tipu is an object of reverence in Pakistan; naturally so, as he lived and died for Islam. A Street in Islamabad (Rawalpindi) is named after him. A missile developed by Pakistan bears his name. Even in India there is no lack of his admirers. Recently the Government of Karnataka decided to celebrate his birth anniversary, a decision which generated considerable opposition. While the official line was that Tipu was a freedom fighter, a liberal, tolerant and enlightened ruler, its opponents accused that he was a bigot, a mass murderer, a rapist. This book is written to show him as he really was. To state it briefly: If Tipu would have been allowed to have his way, most probably, there would have been, besides an East and a West Pakistan, a South Pakistan as well. At the least there would have been a refractory state like the Nizam's. His suppression in 1792, and ultimate destruction in 1799, had therefore a profound impact on the history of India. There is a class of historians who, for a long time, are portraying Tipu as a benevolent ruler. To counter them I can do no better than to follow Dr. R. C. Majumdar: “This … tendency”, he writes, “to make history the vehicle of certain definite political, social and economic ideas, which reign supreme in each country for the time being, is like a cloud, at present no bigger than a man's hand, but which may soon grow in volume, and overcast the sky, covering the light of the world by an impenetrable gloom.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Water Quality Changes in Krishna River of Andhrap Radesh Through Geoinformatics
    International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6C2, April 2019 Assessment of Water Quality Changes in Krishna River of Andhrap radesh Through Geoinformatics Lakshman Kumar.C.H, D. Satish Chandra, S.S.Asadi Abstract--- Pancha Boothas are Life and Death for the are permissible in river water but exceed their level its Environment. In that any one is Disrupted that can be Escort to causes several diseases for users and Toxic elements, excess the danger of environment. Water is the one of the Pancha nutrients create vadose zones in river courses [5]. Most of Boothas. Quality of the water is very crucial in the present and the assured irrigation in India is surface water of rivers. It is future users. Natural issues and manmade activities are depending on the water quality. The ratio of transportation of essential to monitor and assess the water quality in the fresh water in liquid form to covert useless form is 70%. The Krishna river course. ratio of sedimentation is also one of the parameter of the water quality, if changes are happen in sedimentation the quality of the Notations: water also changes. The causes of water pollution source are GDSQ: Gauge Discharge Sediment and Water Quality many, of which sewage discharge, industrial effluents, agricultural effluents and several man made activities are play a GDQ : Gauge Discharge Water Quality key role on water quality. The total percentage of water in the pH : Potential of Hydrogen world is 97% in Oceans and reaming 3% of water in form of EC : Electric Conductivity glaciers, in which the consumption of water quantity is in form of CO3 : Carbonate surface and subsurface water bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnataka Commissioned Projects S.No. Name of Project District Type Capacity(MW) Commissioned Date
    Karnataka Commissioned Projects S.No. Name of Project District Type Capacity(MW) Commissioned Date 1 T B Dam DB NCL 3x2750 7.950 2 Bhadra LBC CB 2.000 3 Devraya CB 0.500 4 Gokak Fall ROR 2.500 5 Gokak Mills CB 1.500 6 Himpi CB CB 7.200 7 Iruppu fall ROR 5.000 8 Kattepura CB 5.000 9 Kattepura RBC CB 0.500 10 Narayanpur CB 1.200 11 Shri Ramadevaral CB 0.750 12 Subramanya CB 0.500 13 Bhadragiri Shimoga CB M/S Bhadragiri Power 4.500 14 Hemagiri MHS Mandya CB Trishul Power 1x4000 4.000 19.08.2005 15 Kalmala-Koppal Belagavi CB KPCL 1x400 0.400 1990 16 Sirwar Belagavi CB KPCL 1x1000 1.000 24.01.1990 17 Ganekal Belagavi CB KPCL 1x350 0.350 19.11.1993 18 Mallapur Belagavi DB KPCL 2x4500 9.000 29.11.1992 19 Mani dam Raichur DB KPCL 2x4500 9.000 24.12.1993 20 Bhadra RBC Shivamogga CB KPCL 1x6000 6.000 13.10.1997 21 Shivapur Koppal DB BPCL 2x9000 18.000 29.11.1992 22 Shahapur I Yadgir CB BPCL 1x1300 1.300 18.03.1997 23 Shahapur II Yadgir CB BPCL 1x1301 1.300 18.03.1997 24 Shahapur III Yadgir CB BPCL 1x1302 1.300 18.03.1997 25 Shahapur IV Yadgir CB BPCL 1x1303 1.300 18.03.1997 26 Dhupdal Belagavi CB Gokak 2x1400 2.800 04.05.1997 AHEC-IITR/SHP Data Base/July 2016 141 S.No. Name of Project District Type Capacity(MW) Commissioned Date 27 Anwari Shivamogga CB Dandeli Steel 2x750 1.500 04.05.1997 28 Chunchankatte Mysore ROR Graphite India 2x9000 18.000 13.10.1997 Karnataka State 29 Elaneer ROR Council for Science and 1x200 0.200 01.01.2005 Technology 30 Attihalla Mandya CB Yuken 1x350 0.350 03.07.1998 31 Shiva Mandya CB Cauvery 1x3000 3.000 10.09.1998
    [Show full text]
  • FM Holds Inter-Ministerial Meeting on Banning Sugar Futures Sugarcane
    NEWS FLASH –24th August, 2016 SUGAR FM holds inter-ministerial meeting on banning sugar futures Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Monday held an inter-ministerial consultation on imposing ban on sugar futures trading in an effort to curb speculation and check price rise of the sweetener during festival season. MoS for Food C L Chaudhary, secretaries from Food, Consumer Affairs, Agriculture and finance ministries were present in the meeting. The meeting comes in the backdrop of the Food and Consumer Affairs Ministry recommending the regulator Sebi to ban sugar futures trade to check prices. Sugar prices in the retail markets have risen in last few weeks and are ruling at Rs 42 per kg in the national capital. “We discussed about banning sugar futures trading in the meeting called by the FM. It was an initial discussion and nothing was decided,” Chaudhary told Press Trust of India after the meeting. Food Secretary Vrinda Sarup echoed the same and said: “Nothing has been finalised on banning sugar futures.” Sugar is largely traded on leading agri-commodity bourse National Commodity and Derivatives Exchange (NCDEX). The exchange has already raised the margin amount to be deposited by both sellers and buyers on its platform. To check prices, the government recently imposed an export duty of 20 per cent on sugar as part of its efforts to curb outbound shipments and boost domestic supply. India’s sugar production is estimated to decline to 25 million tonnes in the 2015-16 season (October-September) from 28.3 million tonnes in the previous year. The outlook for the next year is not encouraging as sugar production is pegged lower at 23.26 million tonnes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kalasa & Bhandura Nala Diversion Scheme for Drinking
    KALASA & BHANDURA NALA DIVERSION SCHEME FOR DRINKING WATER SUPPLY, KHANAPUR TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT, KARNATAKA BY KARNATAKA NEERAVARI NIGAM LIMITED, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA The Kalasa & Bhandura Nala Diversion Scheme for Drinking Water Supply involves diversion of west flowing streams/nalas in Mahadayi basin to water deficit Malaprabha basin by construction of three diversion dams across Haltara Nala, Kalasa Nala and Bhandura Nala. It is proposed to divert 7.56 TMC of water during monsoon season through Inter Connecting gravity Canals for crossing the ridges. The project is exclusively proposed for providing drinking water facilities to Hubli-Dharwad Towns, Kundgol Town and enroute villages as part of commitment to National Water Policy, 2012. The total cost of the project is 840.52 Cr. The construction activities include: 1. Construction of Diversion dam across Haltara nala. 2. Construction of Diversion dam across Kalasa nala. 3. Construction of Inter connecting gravity canal from FRL of Haltara diversion dam to FRL of Kalasa diversion dam. 4. Construction of interconnecting canal from Kalasa diversion dam to Malaprabha River. 5. Construction of Diversion dam across Bhandura nala. 6. Construction of Inter connecting gravity canal from Bhandura Diversion dam to Malaprabha River. The proposed project requires a total land of 730.92 Ha of land for the construction of project components and submergence of forest, Government and Private land. The proposed project involves diversion of 499.13 Ha (including submergence of 406.60 Ha) of forest land. The private land will be acquired as per the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013. Whereas, the forest land will be diverted as per the provisions of Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • KPCL POWER PROJECTS in KARNATAKA Installed Capacity Sl.No Power Stations Units X MW
    KPCL POWER PROJECTS IN KARNATAKA Installed capacity Sl.No Power Stations Units x MW A. HYDRO PROJECTS Cauvery River Basin Sir Sheshadri Iyer Hydro Electric Station 4x6 1 42.00 ( Shivanasamudram) 6x3 2 Shimsha Hydro Electric Station 2x8.6 17.20 Total 59.20 Sharavathy valley Project 3 Linganamakki Dam Power House 2 x 27.5 55.00 4 4x21.6 Mahathma Gandhi Hydro Electric Station 139.20 4x13.2 5 Sharavathi Generating Station 10 x 103.5 1035.00 Total 1229.20 Gerusoppa Hydro Electric Project 6 Gerusoppa Dam Powerhouse 4 x 60 240.00 Kali Hydro Electric Project 7 Supa Dam Powerhouse 2x50 100.00 8 Nagjari Powerhouse 5x150+1x135 885.00 9 Kadra Dam Powerhouse : 3 x 50 =150 3 x 50 150.00 10 Kodasalli Dam Powerhouse : 3 x 40=120 3 x 40 120.00 Total 1255.00 Varahi Hydro Electric Project 11 Mani Dam Powerhouse 2x4.5 9.00 12 Varahi UGPH :4 x 115 =460 4 x 115 460.00 Total 469.00 Krishna Basin Project 13 1X15 Almatti Dam Power House 290.00 5x55 Mini Hydro Electric Project Bhadra Project 14 1x7.2 Bhadra Right Bank Canal Powerhouse 13.20 1x6 15 2 x12 Bhadra Left Bank Canal Powerhouse 26.00 1x2 16 2x9 Munirabad Power House(Thunga Bhadra Basin) 28.00 1x10 17 Ghataprabha Dam Powerhouse 2 x 16 32.00 18 Mallapur Mini Hydel Scheme 2x4.5 9.00 19 Sirwar Mini Hydel Scheme 1x1 1.00 20 Kalmala Mini Hydel Scheme 1 x 0.40 0.40 21 Ganekal Mini Hydel Scheme 1 x 0.35 0.35 Total 109.95 Total Hydro 3652.35 B.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Water Quality ------61 6.1 Surface Water Quality Observations ------61 6.2 Ground Water Quality Observations ------62 7
    Version 2.0 Krishna Basin Preface Optimal management of water resources is the necessity of time in the wake of development and growing need of population of India. The National Water Policy of India (2002) recognizes that development and management of water resources need to be governed by national perspectives in order to develop and conserve the scarce water resources in an integrated and environmentally sound basis. The policy emphasizes the need for effective management of water resources by intensifying research efforts in use of remote sensing technology and developing an information system. In this reference a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was signed on December 3, 2008 between the Central Water Commission (CWC) and National Remote Sensing Centre (NRSC), Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) to execute the project “Generation of Database and Implementation of Web enabled Water resources Information System in the Country” short named as India-WRIS WebGIS. India-WRIS WebGIS has been developed and is in public domain since December 2010 (www.india- wris.nrsc.gov.in). It provides a ‘Single Window solution’ for all water resources data and information in a standardized national GIS framework and allow users to search, access, visualize, understand and analyze comprehensive and contextual water resources data and information for planning, development and Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM). Basin is recognized as the ideal and practical unit of water resources management because it allows the holistic understanding of upstream-downstream hydrological interactions and solutions for management for all competing sectors of water demand. The practice of basin planning has developed due to the changing demands on river systems and the changing conditions of rivers by human interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Do Interstate Water Disputes Emerge and Recur? an Anatomy of Ambiguities, Antagonisms and Asymmetries
    Pre-publication Draft Why do interstate water disputes emerge and recur? an anatomy of ambiguities, antagonisms and asymmetries Srinivas Chokkakula Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi [email protected] (To be published under RULNR monograph series, CESS, Hyderabad) Srinivas Chokkakula Pre-publication Draft Acknowledgements This monograph has taken much longer than initially planned. The research presented here is part of my dissertation work, and I have planned to publish this soon after submitting the dissertation (for my Ph D from the University of Washington, Seattle, USA) in 2015. The earlier draft received some useful and critical inputs, which set me on revising it substantially and also increasing its scope. It is now considerably improved and I hope that it will be received with interest. I express my deep gratitude to two individuals on this account: Dr Radha D’Souza for her critical review and discussion of the draft, and Dr Gopinath Reddy at CESS for his extraordinary patience and undeserving belief in me and my work. I am also thank Prof Gopal Kadekodi for his comments on an earlier version of the draft. I thank my colleagues at the Centre for Policy Research (CPR), New Delhi, for conversations, inputs and support at different stages of producing this research. I am grateful to Dr Pratap Bhanu Mehta and Dr Partha Mukhopadhyay for their unstinting support. I have been fortunate to benefit from generous conversations with late Prof Ramaswamy Iyer on the subject. I have also benefitted from interactions with several professional colleagues engaged directly with interstate water disputes resolution. I want to particularly acknowledge the enthusiastic the generous support of Mr Mohan Katarki.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Public Sector Undertakings
    Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India on Public Sector Undertakings for the year ended March 2014 Government of Karnataka Report No.9 of the year 2014 Table of contents Paragraph Particulars Page No. No. Preface v Overview vii-xiii Chapter I Overview of State Public Sector Undertakings Introduction 1.1-1.3 1-2 Accountability framework 1.4-1.8 2-3 Stake of Government of Karnataka 1.9-1.13 4-5 Budgetary support to PSUs 1.14-1.15 5-6 Guarantees for loan and guarantee commission 1.16 6 outstanding Absence of accurate figures of the investment in PSUs 1.17-1.18 6-7 Arrears in finalisation of accounts 1.19-1.22 7-8 Impact of non-finalisation of accounts 1.23-1.26 8 Performance of PSUs 1.27-1.35 8-11 Non-working PSUs 1.36-1.38 11-12 Comments on Accounts and Internal Audit 1.39-1.42 12-14 Finalisation of accounts by Statutory Corporations 1.43-1.45 15-16 Recoveries at the instance of Audit 1.46 16 Disinvestment, privatisation and restructuring of PSUs 1.47 16-17 Reforms in power sector 1.48-1.49 17-18 Chapter II Performance Audits relating to Government Companies Karnataka Power Corporation Limited 2.1 19 Performance Audit on ‘Construction and performance of Bellary Thermal Power Station’ Executive Summary 19-20 Introduction 2.1.1 21 Audit Objectives 2.1.2 21 Scope of Audit 2.1.3 21-22 Audit Methodology 2.1.4 22-23 Audit Criteria 2.1.5 23 Audit Findings 2.1.6 23 Planning 2.1.7-2.1.7.3 23-27 Project execution 2.1.8.1-2.1.10 27-31 Operational efficiency 2.1.11-2.1.11.8 31-36 i Audit Report –PSUs for the year ended 31 March 2014 Paragraph Particulars Page No.
    [Show full text]