DOCSLIB.ORG

Subpoena to James Risen in U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subpoena to James Risen in U.S By email August 21, 2013 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 Arlington, Va. 22209-2211 (703) 807-2100 Eric H. Holder, Jr., Esq. www.rcfp.org Attorney General of the United States Bruce D. Brown United States Department of Justice Executive Director [email protected] 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (703) 807-2101 Washington, DC 20530 STEERING COMMITTEE Re: Subpoena to James Risen in U.S. v. Sterling SCOTT APPLEWHITE The Associated Press WOLF BLITZER Dear Attorney General Holder: CNN DAVID BOARDMAN Seattle Times On July 25, 2013, lawyers for reporter James Risen wrote to you to CHIP BOK Creators Syndicate urge you to withdraw the subpoena issued to him in the Jeffrey Sterling case. JAN CRAWFORD The undersigned news media organizations write in support of that request. CBS News MICHAEL DUFFY We too believe that the subpoena to Mr. Risen should be subject to the new Time principles announced in your July report and that a careful examination of the RICHARD S. DUNHAM Houston Chronicle facts shows that a demand for his testimony is not justified. ASHLEA EBELING Forbes Magazine SUSAN GOLDBERG The recent interactions between you and your senior staff and our Bloomberg News media coalition have been productive in formulating proposed changes to FRED GRAHAM InSession Justice Department subpoena policy that, upon implementation, should JOHN C. HENRY provide positive next steps in protecting the news media’s ability to report on Freelance NAT HENTOFF matters of public interest without sacrificing the legitimate needs of law United Media Newspaper Syndicate enforcement. The Sterling trial presents a meaningful opportunity to see how JEFF LEEN The Washington Post the Department will apply these principles in an important case. DAHLIA LITHWICK Slate TONY MAURO As Mr. Risen’s attorneys have already pointed out, the new National Law Journal Department policy authorizes a subpoena to a member of the news media JANE MAYER The New Yorker only “as a last resort, after all reasonable alternative investigative steps have JOHN McKINNON been taken, and when the information sought is essential to a successful The Wall Street Journal DOYLE MCMANUS investigation or prosecution.” At this stage in the case, the question before Los Angeles Times the Department is more one of policy than law, and from that perspective the ANDREA MITCHELL NBC News court proceedings below support withdrawal of the subpoena despite the MAGGIE MULVIHILL New England Center for Investigative Reporting outcome in the Fourth Circuit. The trial court decision underscores the BILL NICHOLS weaknesses in the prosecutors’ justifications for the subpoena – findings Politico which go straight to the three factors of the new guidelines test. Conversely, SANDRA PEDDIE Newsday the reversal by the appellate court, with its complete rejection of the interests JEFFREY ROSEN The New Republic of a free press and its narrow reading of the privilege factors that would ERIC SCHMITT render them irrelevant in any unauthorized disclosures case, actually sheds The New York Times ALICIA SHEPARD little light on the analysis which the Department must now undertake. Freelance MARGARET LOW SMITH NPR The trial court applied a three-part test somewhat similar to the new PAUL STEIGER Department guidelines, weighing the relevance of the information sought, its Pro Publica availability by alternative means, and whether the government has a PIERRE THOMAS ABC News compelling interest in obtaining it. In her July 29, 2011 opinion, U.S. District SAUNDRA TORRY USA Today JUDY WOODRUFF PBS/The NewsHour Affiliations appear only for purposes of identification. Judge Leonie M. Brinkema found the information clearly relevant to a prosecution for unauthorized disclosure. Nonetheless, the court quashed the subpoena based on the latter two factors. In considering alternative sources for the information, Judge Brinkema rejected the government’s argument that it is “self-evident” that Mr. Risen would be the only source of the information and noted the abundant circumstantial and documentary evidence that supported the proposition that the government sought to prove, “including numerous telephone records, email messages, computer files, and testimony [from two other witnesses] that strongly indicates that Sterling was Risen’s source.” U.S. v. Sterling, 818 F.Supp.2d 945, 956 (2011). Regarding the third factor, the court found the government’s arguments circular. Prosecutors had argued that the “burden of establishing Sterling’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt creates a compelling interest in obtaining Risen’s testimony.” Id. at 959. But such a proposition would render the compelling interest test meaningless because the government would always win in criminal cases. The court also noted that the government had not explained why Mr. Risen’s evidence was decisive: [It] has not pleaded that Risen’s testimony is necessary or critical to proving Sterling’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; instead, it has argued that Risen’s testimony will ‘simplify the trial and clarify matters for the jury’ and ‘allow for an efficient presentation of the Government’s case.’ An efficient and simpler trial is neither necessary nor critical to demonstrating Sterling’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If making the trial more efficient or simpler were sufficient to satisfy the LaRouche compelling interest factor, there would hardly be a qualified reporter’s privilege. Id. Over the strong dissent of Judge Gregory, the Fourth Circuit reversed the trial court and refused to recognize the existence of a reporter’s privilege in criminal cases. The Department’s task in this case thus already takes prosecutors down a different road because the Department recognizes the importance of evaluating these factors in every instance. The Fourth Circuit did examine the elements of the qualified privilege but made clear it would always find a “compelling interest” in criminal prosecutions and would recognize no alternative sources for a reporter’s testimony in unauthorized disclosure cases. The majority on the panel, in other words, found no interests at stake other than the government’s, even though Mr. Risen acted to inform the public about an intelligence operation that had been allegedly mishandled. The Justice Department, however, has turned its back on this kind of absolutist approach that delegitimizes the interests of the news media in informing the public about national security – if not as a matter of law, at least as a matter of policy in wielding its prosecutorial powers. Reading the Department’s commitments for new guideline factors in a way that makes them meaningless in the very cases where public accountability and free speech interests are at their highest would be inconsistent with all the thought and effort dedicated to these issues in the last few months. We hope that a careful consideration of the record here will lead to the withdrawal of the subpoena. If the Department pushes ahead with the demand for Mr. Risen’s testimony, we believe that an explanation would be in order as to how it reached its conclusion. You agreed in your July report to annually release statistics on this approval process, including the outcome of any challenges by the news media, to “enhance oversight” of the process. An explanation of the Department’s decision to go forward against Mr. Risen, should that occur, would similarly help with oversight and understanding of this process, not just in this case but in all media subpoena cases. Sincerely, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press Bruce D. Brown, Executive Director Gregg P. Leslie, Legal Defense Director ABC, Inc. Lee Enterprises, Inc. Advance Publications, Inc. The McClatchy Company Allbritton Communications Company Media Law Resource Center ALM Media, LLC Mother Jones American Society of News Editors National Association of Broadcasters The Associated Press The National Press Club Atlantic Media, Inc. National Press Photographers Ass’n Bloomberg L.P. National Public Radio, Inc. Cable News Network, Inc. NBCUniversal Media, LLC California Newspaper Publishers Ass’n The New York Times Company CBS Broadcasting Inc. The New Yorker Committee to Protect Journalists Newspaper Association of America The Daily Beast Company LLC North Jersey Media Group Inc. Daily News, LP Online News Association Dow Jones & Company, Inc. POLITICO LLC The E.W. Scripps Company Radio Television Digital News Ass’n First Amendment Coalition Reuters America LLC Forbes LLC The Seattle Times Company Fox News Network LLC Society of Professional Journalists Hearst Corporation Time Inc. Investigative Reporters and Editors Tribune Company Investigative Reporting Workshop The Washington Post Journal Communications, Inc. cc: Joel Kurtzberg, Esq. David N. Kelley, Esq. Robert Parker, Esq. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geopolitics, Oil Law Reform, and Commodity Market Expectations
    OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW VOLUME 63 WINTER 2011 NUMBER 2 GEOPOLITICS, OIL LAW REFORM, AND COMMODITY MARKET EXPECTATIONS ROBERT BEJESKY * Table of Contents I. Introduction .................................... ........... 193 II. Geopolitics and Market Equilibrium . .............. 197 III. Historical U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East ................ 202 IV. Enter OPEC ..................................... ......... 210 V. Oil Industry Reform Planning for Iraq . ............... 215 VI. Occupation Announcements and Economics . ........... 228 VII. Iraq’s 2007 Oil and Gas Bill . .............. 237 VIII. Oil Price Surges . ............ 249 IX. Strategic Interests in Afghanistan . ................ 265 X. Conclusion ...................................... ......... 273 I. Introduction The 1973 oil supply shock elevated OPEC to world attention and ensconced it in the general consciousness as a confederacy that is potentially * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. 193 194 OKLAHOMA LAW REVIEW [Vol. 63:193 antithetical to global energy needs. From 1986 until mid-1999, prices generally fluctuated within a $10 to $20 per barrel band, but alarms sounded when market prices started hovering above $30. 1 In July 2001, Senator Arlen Specter addressed the Senate regarding the need to confront OPEC and urged President Bush to file an International Court of Justice case against the organization, on the basis that perceived antitrust violations were a breach of “general principles of law.” 2 Prices dipped initially, but began a precipitous rise in mid-March 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:13-Cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15
    Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION; NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; and NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, Plaintiffs, v. No. 13-cv-03994 (WHP) JAMES R. CLAPPER, in his official capacity as Director of National Intelligence; KEITH B. ALEXANDER, in his ECF CASE official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service; CHARLES T. HAGEL, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense; ERIC H. HOLDER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; and ROBERT S. MUELLER III, in his official capacity as Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Defendants. BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND 18 NEWS MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Of counsel: Michael D. Steger Bruce D. Brown Counsel of Record Gregg P. Leslie Steger Krane LLP Rob Tricchinelli 1601 Broadway, 12th Floor The Reporters Committee New York, NY 10019 for Freedom of the Press (212) 736-6800 1101 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1100 [email protected] Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 807-2100 Case 1:13-cv-03994-WHP Document 42-1 Filed 09/04/13 Page 2 of 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ....................................................................................................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT…………………………………………………………………1 ARGUMENT……………………………………………………………………………………2 I. The integrity of a confidential reporter-source relationship is critical to producing good journalism, and mass telephone call tracking compromises that relationship to the detriment of the public interest……………………………………….2 A There is a long history of journalists breaking significant stories by relying on information from confidential sources…………………………….4 B.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Court of Appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT
    Case 14-2985, Document 88, 12/15/2014, 1393895, Page1 of 64 14-2985-cv IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT In the Matter ofd a Warrant to Search a Certain E-mail Account Controlled and Maintained by Microsoft Corporation, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Appellant, —v.— UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT LAURA R. HANDMAN ALISON SCHARY DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP 1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 973-4200 Attorneys for Amici Curiae Media Organizations Case 14-2985, Document 88, 12/15/2014, 1393895, Page2 of 64 OF COUNSEL Indira Satyendra David Vigilante John W. Zucker CABLE NEWS NETWORK , INC . ABC, INC . One CNN Center 77 West 66th Street, 15th Floor Atlanta, GA 30303 New York, NY 10036 Counsel for Cable News Network, Counsel for ABC, Inc. Inc. Richard A. Bernstein Andrew Goldberg SABIN , BERMANT & GOULD LLP THE DAILY BEAST One World Trade Center 555 West 18th Street 44th Floor New York, New York 10011 New York, NY 10007 Counsel for The Daily Beast Counsel for Advance Publications, Company LLC Inc. Matthew Leish Kevin M. Goldberg Cyna Alderman FLETCHER HEALD & HILDRETH NEW YORK DAILY NEWS 1300 North 17th Street, 11th Floor 4 New York Plaza Arlington, VA 22209 New York, NY 10004 Counsel for the American Counsel for Daily News, L.P. Society of News Editors and the Association of Alternative David M. Giles Newsmedia THE E.W. SCRIPPS COMPANY 312 Walnut St., Suite 2800 Scott Searl Cincinnati, OH 45202 BH MEDIA GROUP Counsel for The E.W.
    [Show full text]
  • N Ieman Reports
    NIEMAN REPORTS Nieman Reports One Francis Avenue Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Nieman Reports THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION FOR JOURNALISM AT HARVARD UNIVERSITY VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 VOL. 62 NO. 1 SPRING 2008 21 ST CENTURY MUCKRAKERS THE NIEMAN FOUNDATION HARVARDAT UNIVERSITY 21st Century Muckrakers Who Are They? How Do They Do Their Work? Words & Reflections: Secrets, Sources and Silencing Watchdogs Journalism 2.0 End Note went to the Carnegie Endowment in New York but of the Oakland Tribune, and Maynard was throw- found times to return to Cambridge—like many, ing out questions fast and furiously about my civil I had “withdrawal symptoms” after my Harvard rights coverage. I realized my interview was lasting ‘to promote and elevate the year—and would meet with Tenney. She came to longer than most, and I wondered, “Is he trying to my wedding in Toronto in 1984, and we tried to knock me out of competition?” Then I happened to keep in touch regularly. Several of our class, Peggy glance over at Tenney and got the only smile from standards of journalism’ Simpson, Peggy Engel, Kat Harting, and Nancy the group—and a warm, welcoming one it was. I Day visited Tenney in her assisted living facility felt calmer. Finally, when the interview ended, I in Cambridge some years ago, during a Nieman am happy to say, Maynard leaped out of his chair reunion. She cared little about her own problems and hugged me. Agnes Wahl Nieman and was always interested in others. Curator Jim Tenney was a unique woman, and I thoroughly Thomson was the public and intellectual face of enjoyed her friendship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane
    TIMELINE: Congressional Oversight in the Face of Executive Branch and Media Suppression: The Case Study of Crossfire Hurricane 2009 FBI opens a counterintelligence investigation of the individual who would become Christopher Steele’s primary sub-source because of his ties to Russian intelligence officers.1 June 2009: FBI New York Field Office (NYFO) interviews Carter Page, who “immediately advised [them] that due to his work and overseas experiences, he has been questioned by and provides information to representatives of [another U.S. government agency] on an ongoing basis.”2 2011 February 2011: CBS News investigative journalist Sharyl Attkisson begins reporting on “Operation Fast and Furious.” Later in the year, Attkisson notices “anomalies” with several of her work and personal electronic devices that persist into 2012.3 2012 September 11, 2012: Attack on U.S. installations in Benghazi, Libya.4 2013 March 2013: The existence of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s private email server becomes publicly known.5 May 2013: o News reports reveal Obama’s Justice Department investigating leaks of classified information and targeting reporters, including secretly seizing “two months of phone records for reporters and editors of The Associated Press,”6 labeling Fox News reporter James Rosen as a “co-conspirator,” and obtaining a search warrant for Rosen’s personal emails.7 May 10, 2013: Reports reveal that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) targeted and unfairly scrutinized conservative organizations seeking tax-exempt status.8
    [Show full text]
  • Sending a Letter
    August 18, 2015 ! 1156!15th!St.!NW,!Suite!1250! Washington,!D.C.!20005! Steve Stenger, County Executive (202)!795<9300! www.rcfp.org! Peter Krane, County Counselor Bruce!D.!Brown! Steven Robson, Assistant County Counselor Executive!Director! [email protected]!!!(202)!795<9301 41 South Central Avenue Clayton, MO 63105 STEERING!COMMITTEE! ! STEPHEN!J.!ADLER! Reuters' SCOTT!APPLEWHITE! The'Associated'Press' Dear Sirs: WOLF!BLITZER! CNN' DAVID!BOARDMAN! The undersigned coalition of news organizations writes to object to your Temple'University' CHIP!BOK! office’s recent decisions to pursue criminal charges against a number of Creators'Syndicate' JAN!CRAWFORD! journalists arrested or detained last summer during the protests in Ferguson. CBS'News'' MICHAEL!DUFFY! Time' The fact that these journalists were kept from doing their jobs was RICHARD!S.!DUNHAM! Tsinghua'University,'Beijing' troublesome enough. But the fact that your office – after having had time to ASHLEA!EBELING!! reflect on police actions for a full year – has chosen to pursue criminal Forbes'Magazine' SUSAN!GOLDBERG! prosecution now is astonishing. National'Geographic' FRED!GRAHAM! Founding'Member' Last summer, after hearing that journalists were being arrested in Ferguson, JOHN!C.!HENRY! Freelance' then-U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. said in a statement, “Journalists NAT!HENTOFF! United'Media'Newspaper'Syndicate' must not be harassed or prevented from covering a story that needs to be JEFF!LEEN! told.” That statement should not have to be made. It is difficult to The'Washington'Post' DAHLIA!LITHWICK! understand what interest the county is defending by charging these Slate' TONY!MAURO! journalists, when they were clearly engaged in newsgathering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Obama Administration and the Press Leak Investigations and Surveillance in Post-9/11 America
    The Obama Administration and the Press Leak investigations and surveillance in post-9/11 America By Leonard Downie Jr. with reporting by Sara Rafsky A special report of the Committee to Protect Journalists Leak investigations and surveillance in post-9/11 America U.S. President Barack Obama came into office pledging open government, but he has fallen short of his promise. Journalists and transparency advocates say the White House curbs routine disclosure of information and deploys its own media to evade scrutiny by the press. Aggressive prosecution of leakers of classified information and broad electronic surveillance programs deter government sources from speaking to journalists. A CPJ special report by Leonard Downie Jr. with reporting by Sara Rafsky Barack Obama leaves a press conference in the East Room of the White House August 9. (AFP/Saul Loeb) Published October 10, 2013 WASHINGTON, D.C. In the Obama administration’s Washington, government officials are increasingly afraid to talk to the press. Those suspected of discussing with reporters anything that the government has classified as secret are subject to investigation, including lie-detector tests and scrutiny of their telephone and e-mail records. An “Insider Threat Program” being implemented in every government department requires all federal employees to help prevent unauthorized disclosures of information by monitoring the behavior of their colleagues. Six government employees, plus two contractors including Edward Snowden, have been subjects of felony criminal prosecutions since 2009 under the 1917 Espionage Act, accused of leaking classified information to the press— compared with a total of three such prosecutions in all previous U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Dilemmas Facing White House Counsel in the Trump Administration: the Costs of Public Disclosure of Fisa Requests
    LEGAL DILEMMAS FACING WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL IN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION: THE COSTS OF PUBLIC DISCLOSURE OF FISA REQUESTS Peter Margulies* INTRODUCTION Not every presidential administration can forge a new brand of government lawyering. Historically, government lawyering has swung between two poles: (1) dialogic lawyering, which stresses reasoned elaboration, respect for institutions, and continuity with unwritten norms embodied in past practice; and (2) insular lawyering, which entails opaque definitions, disregard of other institutions, and departures from unwritten norms.1 Because President Trump regularly signals his disdain for institutions, such as the intelligence community, and unwritten norms, such as prosecutorial independence,2 senior lawyers in the White House have added a new mode of legal representation that entails ad hoc adjustments to President Trump’s mercurial decisions and triage among the presidential decisions they will try to temper. Call it: lifeboat lawyering. Lifeboat lawyering, as practiced by Donald F. McGahn II—the first White House Counsel of the Trump administration3—and others, involves * Professor of Law, Roger Williams University School of Law. B.A., Colgate University; J.D., Columbia Law School. I thank Bob Bauer and participants at the Fordham Law Review Colloquium on The Varied Roles, Regulation, and Professional Responsibility of Government Lawyers for comments on a previous draft. For more information on the Colloquium, which was hosted by the Fordham Law Review and the Stein Center for Law and Ethics on October 12, 2018, at Fordham University School of Law, see Bruce A. Green, Lawyers in Government Service—a Foreword, 87 FORDHAM L. REV. 1791 (2019). 1. See Peter Margulies, Reforming Lawyers into Irrelevance?: Reconciling Crisis and Constraint at the Office of Legal Counsel, 39 PEPP.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime,” Chapter 4 of Ruling Tactics (Sparsnäs, Sweden: Irene Publishing, 2017), Available At
    Brian Martin “Crime,” chapter 4 of Ruling Tactics (Sparsnäs, Sweden: Irene Publishing, 2017), available at http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/17rt/ 4 Crime Murder, theft, assault, burglary—these are staples of news coverage. People hear a lot about crime, and nearly every- one thinks it’s a bad thing. Yet there are huge differences in ways different actions are labelled as crime and in the attention they receive. The first distortion is that most attention is given to low-level crime, the sort that hurts a few people and is carried out by relatively powerless individuals. This includes many murders, which attract a lot of attention. Indeed, so potent is murder for attracting attention that it has become a staple of news coverage as well as crime novels and television shows: think of Agatha Christie and CSI and many others like them. Murder is usually thought of as something done by an evil person, who needs to be tracked down, proven guilty and punished. Most despicable of all is the serial killer who preys on victims over a period of years. Yet there is another sort of crime that usually escapes the spotlight, and those responsible are seldom identified or exposed, much less ever prosecuted and convicted. This is crime by those with a lot of power. Let’s start with corporate crime. Corporate executives may enact policies that predictably kill people, sometimes large numbers of people. They may hide evidence show- ing how many people are dying due to their actions. Crime 41 A classic example involved the Ford Pinto.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Winners, Arthur Ross Media Award, American Academy Of
    Past Winners of the Arthur Ross Media Award American Academy of Diplomacy 2018 Carol Giacomo, The New York Times and Pamela Constable, The Washington Post 2017 Fareed Zakaria, CNN and Jonathan Landay, Reuters 2016 Jason Rezaian, The Washington Post and Roy Gutman, Freelance Writer 2015 Gerald Seib, The Wall Street Journal and Martha Raddatz, ABC News and Jim Lobe, LobeLog 2014 Eugene Robinson, The Washington Post and Alexandra Zavis, The Los Angeles Times 2013 Doyle McManus, The Los Angeles Times and Judy Woodruff, PBS News 2012 James Fallows, The Atlantic and Rajiv Chandrasekaran, The Washington Post 2011 Sylvia Poggioli, National Public Radio and Borzou Daragahi, The Financial Times 2010 Walter Pincus, The Washington Post and Trudy Rubin, Philadelphia Inquirer 2009 Anthony Shadid, The Washington Post and Helen Thomas, Hearst Newspapers 2008 Dexter Filkins, The New York Times and Mohamad Bazzi, The Nation 2007 Tom Ricks of The Washington Post and The Miami Herald Latin America Staff (led by Andes Oppenheimer) 2006 Dana Priest of The Washington Post and William Pfaff of Tribune Media Services International. Strengthening American Diplomacy 1200 18th Street, NW, Suite 902 • Washington, DC 20036 Tel 202/331-3721 • Fax 202/833-4555 www.academyofdiplomacy.org 2005 Barbara Demick of The Los Angeles Times and James Boyd of The Minneapolis Star Tribune 2004 Robin Wright of The Washington Post 2003 John Burns of The New York Times and Anne Garrels of National Public Radio 2002 Jim Lehrer of the NewsHour with Jim Lehrer (Note: in 2004, the donor changed the criteria to apply only to the writing press) Strengthening American Diplomacy 1200 18th Street, NW, Suite 902 • Washington, DC 20036 Tel 202/331-3721 • Fax 202/833-4555 www.academyofdiplomacy.org .
    [Show full text]
  • Who Watches the Watchmen? the Conflict Between National Security and Freedom of the Press
    WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO WHO WATCHES THE WATCHMEN WATCHES WHO I see powerful echoes of what I personally experienced as Director of NSA and CIA. I only wish I had access to this fully developed intellectual framework and the courses of action it suggests while still in government. —General Michael V. Hayden (retired) Former Director of the CIA Director of the NSA e problem of secrecy is double edged and places key institutions and values of our democracy into collision. On the one hand, our country operates under a broad consensus that secrecy is antithetical to democratic rule and can encourage a variety of political deformations. But the obvious pitfalls are not the end of the story. A long list of abuses notwithstanding, secrecy, like openness, remains an essential prerequisite of self-governance. Ross’s study is a welcome and timely addition to the small body of literature examining this important subject. —Gabriel Schoenfeld Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute Author of Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law (W.W. Norton, May 2010). ? ? The topic of unauthorized disclosures continues to receive significant attention at the highest levels of government. In his book, Mr. Ross does an excellent job identifying the categories of harm to the intelligence community associated NI PRESS ROSS GARY with these disclosures. A detailed framework for addressing the issue is also proposed. This book is a must read for those concerned about the implications of unauthorized disclosures to U.S. national security. —William A. Parquette Foreign Denial and Deception Committee National Intelligence Council Gary Ross has pulled together in this splendid book all the raw material needed to spark a fresh discussion between the government and the media on how to function under our unique system of government in this ever-evolving information-rich environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Commentary 1-31-17
    Stanley Renshon Public Affairs/Commentary-February 2017 I: Commentary Pieces/Op Ed Pieces 33. “Will Mexico Pay for Trump’s Wall?” [on-line debate, John S. Kierman ed], February 16, 2017. https://wallethub.com/blog/will-mexico-pay-for-the- wall/32590/#stanley-renshon 32. “Psychoanalyst to Trump: Grow up and adapt,” USA TODAY, June 23, 2106. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/06/23/trump-psychoanalyst- grow-up-adapt-column/86181242/ 31. “9/11: What would Trump Do?,” Politico Magazine, March 31, 2016. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/donald-trump-2016-terrorist- attack-foreign-policy-213784 30. “You don't know Trump as well as you think,” USA TODAY, March 25, 2106. http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/03/25/donald-trump-narcissist- business-leadership-respect-column/82209524/ 29. “Some presidents aspire to be great, more aspire to do well’ essay for “The Big Idea- Diagnosing the Urge to Run for Office,” Politico Magazine, November/December 2015. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/10/2016-candidates-mental- health-213274?paginate=false 28. “Obama’s Place in History: Great, Good, Average, Mediocre or Poor?,” Washington Post, February 24, 2014. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/02/24/obamas- place-in-history-great-good-average-mediocre-or-poor/ 27. President Romney or President Obama: A Tale of Two Ambitions, Montreal Review, October 2012. http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/President-Romney-or-President- Obama-A-Tale-of-Two-Ambitions.php 26. America Principio, Por Favor, Arizona Daily Star, July 1, 2012. http://azstarnet.com/news/opinion/guest-column-practice-inhibits-forming-full- attachments-to-us/article_10009d68-0fcc-5f4a-8d38-2f5e95a7e138.html 25.
    [Show full text]