DOCSLIB.ORG

Independent Review of the End of Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Independent Review of the End of Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020 Independent Review of the End of Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020 Prepared by the Tasmanian Policy Exchange at the University of Tasmania February 2021 Independent Review of the End of Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020 February 2021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report has been prepared by the Tasmanian Policy Exchange (TPE) at the University of Tasmania. The TPE was established by the University of Tasmania as a strategic priority in 2020 to enhance the University’s capacity to make timely and informed contributions to policy issues and debates which will shape Tasmania’s future. The Review Panel would like to thank all those who made formal submissions to the Review and to colleagues in Victoria, Western Australia and Queensland who shared their expertise and insights at the Review workshop conducted in early February. We would also like to thank the researchers and staff across the University who contributed their time and expertise to the preparation of this report. THE REVIEW PANEL Professor Richard Eccleston (Chairperson), Tasmanian Policy Exchange Professor Fran McInerney, Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM Professor Margaret Otlowski, School of Madeleine Archer, UTAS Science/Law graduate Law Sarah Hyslop, Tasmanian Policy Exchange Associate Professor Jenny Presser, School of Medicine Hollie Jackson, UTAS Arts/Law graduate Contents TERMS OF REFERENCE ........................................................................................................................................................3 THE REVIEW PANEL .................................................................................................................................................................4 A NOTE ON LANGUAGE ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................................... 9 PART ONE - TASMANIA’S END-OF-LIFE CHOICES (VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING) BILL 2020: THE CONTEXT Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 17 Section 2: The historical development of voluntary assisted dying law ................21 2.1 The history of voluntary assisted dying legislation in Europe, the United States, New Zealand and the United Kingdom ..................................................................................................................21 2.2 The history of voluntary assisted dying legislation in Australia ....................................................................................................................................... 26 2.3 The development of voluntary assisted dying legislation in Victoria, Western Australia and South Australia ..........................................30 2.4 The history of voluntary assisted dying legislation in Tasmania ....................................................................................................................................30 PART TWO – TASMANIA’S END-OF-LIFE CHOICES (VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING) BILL 2020: KEY ELEMENTS AND COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS Section 3: The End of LIfe Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020: A summary ..........................................33 3.1 Objectives and principles ...............................................................................................33 3.2 Eligibility ....................................................................................................................................33 3.3 Consultation and referral process ........................................................................ 36 3.4 Administration of voluntary assisted dying substance ........................ 38 3.5 Legal and other protections ....................................................................................... 41 3.6 Monitoring and oversight ............................................................................................44 Section 4: Tasmania’s End-of-Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020: Comparative analysis.................45 4.1 Key elements of the Victorian Voluntary Assisted Dying Act 2017 ..............................................................................................................................................45 END OF LIFE CHOICES BILL REVIEW - FEBRUARY 2021 1 4.2 Comparative VAD tables ..............................................................................................48 4.3 Tasmania’s End-of-Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill 2020: Comparative analysis ..............................................................................................................54 PART THREE - END-OF-LIFE CHOICES (VOLUNTARY ASSISTED DYING) BILL 2020: PUBLIC SUBMISSIONS AND FURTHER CONSIDERATIONS Section 5: Submissions made to the independent Review Panel .............................................. 59 5.1 Key themes from public submissions ................................................................60 5.2 Specific amendments proposed in submissions ..................................... 62 5.3 Specific amendments which the Review Panel believe warrant consideration ..........................................................................................64 Section 6: Insights and further considerations for VAD in Tasmania ...................................... 67 6.1 Considerations for the implementation and administration of voluntary assisted dying ................................................ 67 6.2 Data on voluntary assisted dying access in Victoria and Canada ..........................................................................................................69 6.3 Considerations for people seeking voluntary assisted dying ....................................................................................................... 72 6.4 Considerations for health and care professionals .................................... 74 6.5 Considerations for hospitals and aged care facilities .......................................................................................................... 78 6.6 Considerations for palliative care and end-of-life planning ........................................................................................................ 81 6.7 Legal considerations ........................................................................................................84 ENDNOTES ...................................................................................................................................................................87 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................................................... 93 APPENDIX 1 Submissions to the Review...............................................................................................100 APPENDIX 2 Complete tables 2.2 and 2.3 .............................................................................................. 101 APPENDIX 3 Summaries of VAD legislation in comparative jurisdictions .................. 103 2 END OF LIFE CHOICES BILL REVIEW - FEBRUARY 2021 The University of Tasmania’s Independent Review of the End-of-Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020 Terms of Reference The VAD Review Panel (the Panel) will include health, legal and social sciences expertise and will provide advice to the Tasmanian Government for dissemination to Members of the House of Assembly on specific matters in relation to the End-of-Life Choices (Voluntary Assisted Dying) Bill 2020 (‘the VAD Bill’) tabled in the Legislative Council by the Hon Michael Gaffney MLC on 27 August 2020. The Panel will conduct research and targeted consultation, through a written submissions process, in relation to the proposed VAD Bill in Tasmania and, in order to inform parliamentary debate, provide an independent and objective report to the Tasmanian Government containing: • A concise summary of the VAD Bill, following amendment by the Upper House. • Comparison of Tasmania’s Proposed VAD Bill to legislation (including Bills) relating to voluntary assisted dying, however described, in other Australian states and territories and overseas jurisdictions, including but not limited to the processes allowed by the legislation, safeguards and protections for vulnerable people. • An outline of the historical development of VAD legislation in other Australian jurisdictions in terms of scope and protections. • Synopsis of relevant reports, analysis and material in other Australian states and territories and overseas jurisdictions pertaining to the implementation and administration of VAD reform. • Objective analysis of: ₀ the safeguards put in place in other jurisdictions relating to the impact of VAD legislation on medical practice and practitioners, allied health and care professionals, family and social relationships, and provision for and practices in aged care. ₀ the interrelationship between the VAD Bill and existing palliative care and advance care directives in Tasmania and the experience of other jurisdictions in implementing VAD legislation to identify matters that might need to be addressed or monitored should the legislation pass into law. ₀ stakeholder feedback relevant to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Finfish Farming in Tasmania
    2020 (No. 4) PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE “A” INTERIM REPORT ON FINFISH FARMING IN TASMANIA Members of the Committee Hon Ruth Forrest MLC (Chair) Hon Mike Gaffney MLC Hon Kerry Finch MLC Hon Sarah Lovell MLC Hon Meg Webb MLC Hon Rob Valentine MLC TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION …………………………….…………………………………………………………….3 APPENDIX A – INTERIM REPORT OF THE SUB-COMMITTEE INQUIRING INTO FINFISH FARMING IN TASMANIA……………..…..…………………………………….………….6 2 INTRODUCTION 1. At a meeting of the Legislative Council Government Administration Committee “A” on Tuesday 19 September 2019, it was resolved that an inquiry be established to inquire into and report upon the planning, assessment, operation and regulation of finfish farming in Tasmania, with particular reference to: 1. The implementation of the Sustainable Industry Growth Plan for the Salmon Industry and its impact on commercial finfish farming operations and local communities, including: a) data collection and publication; b) progress in the development of an industry wide biosecurity plan; 2. Application of the Marine Farming Planning Act 1995 relating to: a) preparation and approval process for marine farming development plans, including modifications and amendments to marine farming development plans; b) allocation of leases, applications for and granting of leases; c) management of finfish farming operations with respect to the prevention of environmental harm; 3. Any other matter incidental thereto. 2. On 26 November 2019, the Committee resolved to discharge Hon Sarah Lovell MLC at her request. In accordance with Sessional Order 5 (30), a Sub- Committee was formed to continue the inquiry under the existing terms of reference. 3. The Membership of the Sub-Committee is: • Hon Meg Webb MLC (Inquiry Chair); • Hon Ruth Forrest MLC; • Hon Kerry Finch MLC; 3 • Hon Mike Gaffney MLC; and • Hon Rob Valentine MLC.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDRO TASMANIA at 10.48 Am the Following Witnesses Appeared Before the Committee
    (No 30) PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA Legislative Council GOVERNMENT BUSINESSES SCRUTINY COMMITTEE ‘A’ 2019 Report with Minutes of Proceedings Members of the Committee: Hon Ruth Forrest MLC (Chair) Hon Kerry Finch MLC Hon Mike Gaffney MLC (Deputy Chair) Hon Sarah Lovell MLC Hon Rob Valentine MLC Hon Meg Webb MLC TABLE OF CONTENTS MINUTES ……………………………………………………………………………….…………….3 APPENDIX – TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS………………………………………. 7 2 MINUTES WEDNESDAY 4 DECEMBER 2019 The Committee met at 1.00 pm in Committee Room No. 2, Parliament House, Hobart. Present: Mr Finch Ms Forrest (Chair) Mr Gaffney (Deputy Chair) Ms Lovell Mr Valentine Ms Webb In Attendance: Ms Gabrielle Woods (Acting Secretary) Confirmation of Minutes The Committee confirmed the Minutes of the Meeting on 29 November 2019 as a true and accurate record. Inwards Correspondence The Committee received the incoming correspondence from stakeholders. At 1.00pm the Committee commenced informal discussion with stakeholders. The Committee suspended at 5.00 pm until 8.50 am on Thursday, 5 December 2019 in Committee Room No. 2. THURSDAY 5 DECEMBER 2019 The Committee resumed at 8.50 am in Committee Room No. 2, Parliament House, Hobart. Present: Mr Finch Ms Forrest (Chair) Mr Gaffney (Deputy Chair) Ms Lovell Mr Valentine Ms Webb Apologies: Nil In Attendance: Mrs Jenny Mannering (Secretary) 3 SUSTAINABLE TIMBER TASMANIA At 9.00 am the following witnesses appeared before the Committee: Hon Guy Barnett MP, Minister for Resources Mr Rob de Fégely, Chairman Mr Steve Whiteley, Chief Executive Officer Mr Chris Brookwell, General Manager, Corporate Services The Minister provided a brief overview and the Committee proceeded to questions.
    [Show full text]
  • 23 March 2021
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Legislative Council Select Committee PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS MEDIA ADVISORY 23 March 2021 The Legislative Council Select Committee on the Production of Documents has today tabled its Report. The Report is available on the Parliament of Tasmania website at: https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/ctee/Council/LC%20Select%20POD.html The Committee was established in response to disputes over the production of documents between governments and the Tasmanian Legislative Council and its Committees including Joint Committees. The report makes six recommendations. Committee Chair, the Hon Ruth Forrest MLC stated: The Tasmanian Legislative Council has the authority to treat refusal to produce documents as a contempt of the house and has a range of processes available that can be applied under standing orders to exert political pressure/remedies to respond to a refusal and that these processes have not been fully-exercised by the Tasmanian Legislative Council. The Committee recommended the Legislative Council and its committees consider the use of available punitive and coercive remedies to address disputes over the production of documents for when they may arise in the future. The Committee further recommended an additional dispute resolution process be considered by the Legislative Council Standing Orders Committee through possible amendment to the Legislative Council’s Standing Orders. This dispute resolution process be based upon the system of Responsible Government and underpinned by the power to call for documents, and consider the use of a suitably qualified independent adviser on claims of public interest immunity. Further recommendations included: • Consideration be given to the development of procedural orders to assist when claims of public interest immunity arise in the Legislative Council and its committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition of Australian Parliaments by Party and Gender: a Quick Guide
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2016–17 16 MAY 2017 Composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender: a quick guide Anna Hough Politics and Public Administration This quick guide contains the most recent tables showing the composition of Australian parliaments by party and gender (see Table 1 and Table 2 below). It takes into account changes to the Commonwealth parliament and the parliaments of Western Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia and Tasmania since the last update was published on 20 February 2017. Commonwealth • In the Senate, Peter Georgiou (PHON, WA) replaces Rod Culleton (Ind., WA), whose election was declared void by the High Court sitting as the Court of Disputed returns. Senator Georgiou was sworn in on 27 March 2017. • Senator Lucy Gichuhi (Ind., SA) replaces Bob Day (Family First Party, SA) following Day’s resignation in November 2016. In late April 2017 the Family First Party merged with the Australian Conservatives (with the combined party to be called the Australian Conservatives). Senator Gichuhi, who was sworn in on 9 May 2017, has opted not to join the merged party. Western Australia • The figures for Western Australia reflect the results of the state general election held on 11 March 2017. New members of the Legislative Council elected on that date are included in the figures, and will take their seats on 22 May 2017. New South Wales • In New South Wales, following three by-elections on 8 April 2017: – Liesl Tesch (ALP) became the Member for Gosford, replacing Kathy Smith (ALP) – James Griffin (LP) became the Member for Manly, replacing Mike Baird (LP) and – Felicity Wilson (LP) became the Member for North Shore, replacing Jillian Skinner (LP).
    [Show full text]
  • February 2021
    FREE FEBRUARY 2021 Paramedic Recognised In April 2021 Mike will have served with as a top apprentice. He originally joined after it had folded some years before. From way. the Tasmanian Ambulance Service for 44 Ambulance Tasmania as volunteer serving the beginning of his 37 years in George His is a face that the George Town commu- years and four months. in his spare time working in George Town. Town, Mike has always been proud of his nity has come to know and respect. membership with the local RSL. He has Mike is an Intensive Care Paramedic and It was during this time he met his wife Lisa always been on hand at Anzac and Remem- A face that has given comfort to families in George Town has been very lucky to have a and had three children and now enjoy their brance services to help with setting up and their worried times, who has helped young dedicated member of the community with grandchildren. providing medical backup for these events. couples see new life enter the world and has such accreditation for the past 37 years. dealt with things we dare not to think of. Mike was a member of George Town Rotary It would be hard to find anyone in the In his younger years Mike did an appren- Club for a number of years, and was cred- George Town Municipality that have not Read More on Page 9 ticeship in sheet metal and he was awarded ited with re-starting Apex in George Town had their lives touched by Mike in some Spend your time wisely.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Release
    LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Legislative Council Select Committee Inquiry MEDIA RELEASE 16 November 201 7 Inquiry into the TasWater Ownership The Legislative Council Select Committee inquiring into TasWater Ownership has tabled its Final Report today. The Inquiry was intended to take evidence in order to assist Legislative Council Members in deliberating the Government’s proposed takeover of TasWater. The Inquiry resulted in 48 findings covering infrastructure, funding, trade waste, the viability of the proposed new entity, the feasibility of the Government’s proposed accelerated infrastructure program and the potential impact on councils as a result of the takeover of TasWater. A key finding is that payment of dividends to council is not guaranteed to occur after 2025. If councils’ TasWater dividends were reduced the sustainability of some councils to provide services may be jeopardized and some councils may need to increase their rates as a result. The Inquiry also examined TasWater’s environmental compliance record and found 25 Tasmanian towns are still on boil water alerts, although TasWater has removed 17 such alerts since commencing operation and has stated that it will be in a position to remove all boil water alerts by August 2018. Mrs Armitage extended the thanks of the Committee to all organisations and individuals who provided evidence to the Inquiry. The Final Report is available on a dedicated Inquiry page of the parliament of Tasmania website at: http://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/ctee/Council/Reports/two.171116.rpt.FINAL.ne.001.pdf Members of the Committee are: Hon Rosemary Armitage MLC (Chair) Hon Robert Armstrong MLC Hon Craig Farrell MLC Hon Kerry Finch MLC (to 11 September 2017) Hon Mike Gaffney MLC Hon Tania Rattray MLC (Deputy Chair) Hon Rob Valentine MLC ends FURTHER INFORMATION: Chairperson Rosemary Armitage MLC (03) 6212 2353 .
    [Show full text]
  • Labor's Plan for Jobs 98.09 72.17 64.33 61.16 Labor Net Operating Balance -1,198.34 -337.67 -36.42 -29.96 -200
    Labor’s COVID-19 Labor’sRecovery PlanPackage for CREATING JOBSWORKING FOR TASMANIA November 2020 JOBSREBUILDING A BETTER & FAIRER TASMANIA Labor’s Plan for Jobs Working for Tasmania COVID-19 has forced us to reflect on the things that A Labor Government will deliver a Jobs Plan that connects education, skills and training, are most important in life: health, family, a secure job private sector investment, government spending and infrastructure development to and our freedom. achieve a common goal of getting more Tasmanians into work. And it has challenged us to think about how we can use the upheaval of this catastrophic global event as a positive force for change. We should not rush to return to “normal” after the pandemic because “normal” wasn’t great for far too Creating more jobs and getting more many Tasmanians before this virus, with one in four “ people into secure and stable jobs is “ people living in poverty. If we think a “return to normal” is the best we can Labor’s number one priority. aspire to upon recovery, we are selling Rebecca White ourselves short. LABOR LEADER Tasmania’s biggest economic challenge before COVID-19 was job creation. The pandemic has only compounded the problem. Creating jobs and getting more people into secure and stable jobs is Labor’s number one priority. But they must be good jobs. COVID-19 exposed the weaknesses in our economy: an over reliance on certain industries, high rates of casualisation and underemployment. We need to address these issues in our recovery or we will remain exposed to repeating the mistakes of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Council Estimates A
    PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA TRANSCRIPT LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL ESTIMATES COMMITTEE A Hon. Roger Jaensch MP Thursday 26 November 2020 MEMBERS Hon Ruth Forrest MLC (Chair) Hon Mike Gaffney MLC (Deputy Chair) Hon Sarah Lovell MLC Hon Dr Bastian Seidel MLC Hon Rob Valentine MLC Hon Meg Webb MLC WITNESSES IN ATTENDANCE Hon. Roger Jaensch MP, Minister for Housing; Minister for Environment and Parks; Minister for Human Services; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs; Minister for Planning Michael Pervan, Secretary, Department of Communities Tasmania Ms Mandy Clarke, Deputy Secretary, Children and Youth Services, Department of Communities Tasmania Ms Pamela Honan, Director - Youth and Family Violence Services, Department of Communities Tasmania Claire Lovell, Director, Children and Families, Children, Department of Communities Tasmania Mr Rod Fazackerly, Principal Finance Officer, Department of Communities Tasmania. Ms Ingrid Ganley, Director, Disability and Community Services, Department of Communities Tasmania Mr Peter White, Deputy Secretary, Housing, Disability and Community Services, Department of Communities Tasmania Ms Jessemy Stone, Director, Housing Programs, Department of Communities Tasmania Mr Tim Baker, Secretary, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment Ms Louise Wilson, Deputy Secretary, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment Mr Wes Ford, Deputy Secretary, Environment Protection Authority, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment Mr Andrew Crane, Manager Policy Advice
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Annual Report 2008–2009 Fourth Annual Report 2008−2009
    4th Annual Report 2008–2009 Fourth Annual Report 2008−2009 To The Honourable Susan Lynette Smith, President of the Legislative Council and The Honourable Michael Polley, Speaker of the House of Assembly We have the honour to submit the fourth report of the Tasmanian Electoral Commission for presentation to the Parliament pursuant to the provisions of section 13 of the Electoral Act 2004. The report covers the period from 1 July 2008 to 30 June 2009. Yours sincerely Liz Gillam Bruce Taylor (Vacant) CHAIRPERSON ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER MEMBER 21 October 2009 Tasmanian Electoral Commission Annual Report 2008–09 ISSN 1834-2981 Printed by Print Applied Technology This report can be downloaded in pdf format at www.tec.tas.gov.au Table of Contents Chairperson’s Introduction ...................................................................................... 1 Electoral Commissioner’s Review ............................................................................ 2 About this Report ..................................................................................................... 3 About the Tasmanian Electoral Commission .......................................................... 3 Formation ........................................................................................................... 3 Functions and powers ....................................................................................... 3 Responsibilities of the Commission and the Commissioner .......................... 4 Approvals, appointments and determinations ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Independents in Tasmania's Legislative Council: Analysing Strategies to Achieve Influence
    Independents in Tasmania’s Legislative Council: Analysing strategies to achieve influence* Kate Crowley and Joshua Lippis Associate Professor, School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania Bachelor of Arts Honours Graduate, School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania *Double-blind reviewed article Abstract Independent Members (IMLCs) have long dominated the Tasmanian Legislative Council (Council). They are expected to play a review and scrutiny rather than a policy-making role. However, this article presents research that finds that such Members are indeed able to achieve policy influence despite their lack of supportive party colleagues or a party structure. Current and former IMLCs, one Labor MLC, and one Member of the lower House of Assembly, were interviewed for this research. They were asked about the IMLC role as they see it, the strategies used, if in fact they are used, to gain policy influence, IMLC work and influence on committees, and the obstacles, including political obstacles, to IMLCs achieving influence. Our paper addresses the lack of studies of the legislative behaviour of Councillors, and establishes that, despite the review and scrutiny focus of their role, and the attribution of the policy- making role to the lower house, IMLCs do seek influence and use various means of achieving it. ‘Tasmania has been well served by an upper house dominated by independents – they are there to knock the rough edges off government’.1 1 Tony Mulder IMLC 2011-17, See G. Burgess, and E. Gramenz, ‘Fresh Calls to Curb the Powers of Tasmania’s Upper House’, ABC News 20 June 2017. 102 INTRODUCTION Westminster upper houses are not known for their power to determine policy, indeed the literature typically suggests that to pursue such power would be to be seen to usurp the policy-making role of lower houses.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIA STATEMENT Peak Body Welcomes Upper House Support of Pill Testing Motion
    MEDIA STATEMENT Peak Body welcomes Upper House support of pill testing motion The Alcohol, Tobacco and other Drugs Council of Tasmania has congratulated the Tasmanian Legislative Council members who supported Member for Murchison, Ruth Forrest’s pill testing motion this evening. ATDC chief executive, Alison Lai said that while the final motion stopped short of calling on the Tasmanian Government to trial pill testing during this festival season, she was very pleased with the outcome, which would assist in keeping a Tasmanian pill testing trial a possibility in the future. “First and foremost we are respectful of the Tasmanian Government’s position that they are not ready, at this stage, to conduct a trial of pill testing,” Ms Lai said. “We appreciate that this is not a matter that will be able to be resolved before the upcoming festival season, and we thank them for their ongoing commitment to reviewing the evidence as it becomes available. “The concept of pill testing continues to generate strong interest and opinions across the broader community, and these diverse views are being mirrored in our parliament. “It is still our position that there is sufficient evidence to conduct a trial of pill testing in Tasmania and we remain committed to working with government to address any concerns that they may have. “We are encouraged by tonight’s outcome, which sends a clear message that the Upper House wants to see strategies introduced to reduce the harms of illicit drugs at our music festivals and events, and that there continues to be broad support for keeping pill testing on the table as a potential option for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Yearbook 2014
    TASMANIAN LEADERS YEARBOOK 2014 LEADERS TASMANIAN YEARBOOK 2014 TASMANIAN LEADERS YEARBOOK 2014 CONTENTS OUR MISSION ..........................................................................................4 OUR VALUES .............................................................................................4 ABOUT TASMANIAN LEADERS .................................................5 PROGRAM OUTCOMES ...................................................................5 MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR .......................................................6 REFLECTIONS ON THE 2014 TLP JOURNEY ......................8 TLP 2014 GRADUATES ................................................................... 20 2014 LEARNING SET PROJECTS .............................................. 44 EMPLOYER TESTIMONIALS .......................................................... 46 LEADERSHIP CHAMPIONS .......................................................... 48 THANK YOU ........................................................................................... 49 TLI BOARD MEMBERS ..................................................................... 50 TASMANIAN LEADERS ALUMNI SUB-COMMITTEE UPDATE .......................................................... 52 2013 GRADUATION DINNER ................................................... 55 GRADUATES ON THE GO ........................................................... 56 TLP GRADUATES ................................................................................ 58 OUR PARTNERS ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]