Private Investment Response to Neoliberal Reforms: Implications of the Argentine Case, 1989-1996 March 1997 Juan J. López Assistant Professor Department of Political Science The University of Illinois at Chicago 1007 West Harrison Street (M/C 276) Chicago, IL 60607-7137 Phone: (312) 413-3783 Fax: (312) 413-0440 E-mail:
[email protected] Draft: comments welcome Prepared for delivery at the 1997 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Continental Plaza Hotel, Guadalajara, Mexico, April 17-19, 1997. 1 Introduction Warren Christopher, then the U.S. Secretary of State, in visit to Buenos Aires in February 1996 declared that Menem and Cavallo "had done in Argentina one of the great economic successes of the century."1 This is the official line in Argentina, echoed by fervent supporters of neoliberal economic reforms abroad. If one only looked at some official statistics on economic growth and investment, one might conclude that economically Argentina is doing wonderfully. Budget deficits have been significantly reduced.2 Since April 1991, after the Convertibility Plan, inflation has been kept at low levels. For the period 1990 to 1995, the annual average rate of GDP growth was 5 percent.3 Gross domestic investment grew at an average annual rate of 12 percent between 1990 and 1995.4 Yet a sober look at the data on the economic situation in Argentina raises serious doubts as to whether a solid foundation is being build in the country for sustainable economic growth. The economic growth since 1991 is to a large extent due to the influx of dollars from abroad and to the utilization of idle productive capacity that firms had.5 Unemployment and 1 Clarín, Edición Internacional, February 27 to March 14, 1996, p.