Preliminary Hydrodynamic Modeling of the Steep Rock Pit Lakes, Atikokan, Ontario

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Preliminary Hydrodynamic Modeling of the Steep Rock Pit Lakes, Atikokan, Ontario Preliminary Hydrodynamic Modeling of the Steep Rock Pit Lakes, Atikokan, Ontario by Larissa Mikkelsen A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the degree in Masters of Sciences Department of Geology Lakehead University © Copyright by Larissa Mikkelsen (2012) Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada 1+1 Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-84405-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-84405-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. Canada/n iM Pit lakes are often a planned part of an open pit mine closure where the excavations are expected to flood and water quality is not an issue. Common environmental issues regarding pit lakes include their rebound rate, hydrodynamic behaviour and water quality. The water quality of pit lakes can be influenced by their hydrodynamics, for example overturn in a holomictic lake can transport dissolved oxygen down to submerged tailing resulting in the production of acid mine waters if sulphide minerals are present, or the unexpected overturn of a meromictic pit lake can bring stagnant, dissolved metal laden waters to surface that may be toxic to aquatic life. Where water quality is of concern and pit lakes outflow into adjacent watersheds their behaviour can determine if noxious material will be brought to the surface and released. At the former Steep Rock Iron Mines property near Atikokan, Ontario, three pit lakes are currently flooding and will eventually join to form a super pit lake before they outflow into the West Arm and subsequently Seine River system. Previous studies on two of the pit lakes, Caland and Hogarth, have shown that the pit lakes are meromictic and holomictic, respectively, and that both have elevated sulphate concentrations. The aim of this research was to: i) evaluate existing rebound models by modeling rebound and assessing which parameters exert the greatest influence on the rebound rate; and, ii) develop hydrodynamic models of Caland and Hogarth pit lakes to assess if their current limnology will change as rebound continues and they outflow into the West Arm. Rebound models are constructed using two approaches and compared to the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Regional Engineering model that accurately predicted water levels to 2011. The first rebound modeling approach uses two curves to model the stage-volume relationships, a hypsometric curve and a surface area versus elevation curve. The second approach fits an exponential curve to measured water elevations and then future water elevations are forecasted by extrapolation. Rebound Model 2B constructed following the first approach matched measured water elevations best for the two pit lakes and predicts 2010 measured water elevations better than the Regional Engineering model. Model 2B predicts that Caland will flow into Hogarth in 2070 and that the new Steep Rock pit lake will outflow into the West Arm in 2087, 18 years longer than predictions made by the Regional Engineering model. Based on the water balance parameter sensitivity analysis, the difference between this study's predictions and those of the Regional Engineering model is the result of different pit volume calculation methods. In this study's rebound models the stage-volume relationships for Hogarth are more accurate than for Caland, suggesting that in future work, at minimum, linear interpolation should be used to define the volume in Caland pit lake. This study is the first to model the hydrodynamics of Caland and Hogarth pit lakes. The Dynamic Reservoir Simulation Model (DYRESM) was used to: i) assess if it can accurately model the current pit lake conditions; and, ii) model the future conditions in Caland and Hogarth for when the pit lakes join and when they outflow to the West Arm. The model salinities are discussed to assess the future toxicity of the pit lakes. DYRESM simulations of current conditions accurately portray the observed limnological characteristics of Caland and Hogarth pit lakes, including: i) that Caland is meromictic and has a lower salinity relative to Hogarth; and, ii) that Hogarth develops a temporary meromix. Simulations of when the two pits join indicate that the freshwater lens in Caland will be maintained, but is thinner, and that Hogarth develops a meromix, which is maintained throughout the simulations. Simulations of when the pit lakes outflow into the West Arm indicate that Caland will maintained its upper freshwater lens and that a fresh water lens is only briefly present in Hogarth. In most cases, variations of the simulations for current and future pit lake conditions, including additional inflows, alteration of the inflow salinities, and the use of a slower rebound rate to define the DYRESM water balance, only produced minor changes in the simulation. iii A linear trend between sulphate concentrations and salinity exists for water samples from Caland and Hogarth. Based on this trend, the DYRESM salinity profiles suggest that the waters that outflow from Caland into Hogarth will have sulphate concentrations ranging from 0 mg/L to 100 mg/L and that waters that outflow from Hogarth will have sulphate concentrations ranging from 1700 mg/L to 1900 mg/L. In general, the sulphate concentrations in Caland are below maximum acceptable limit of all water quality standards while those in Hogarth exceed all water quality standards. These results suggest that the waters that outflow from the pit lakes will be toxic. DYRESM can be used to simulate the future hydrodynamics of Caland and Hogarth pit lakes, however, future studies and field investigations should address some of the areas of uncertainty in the DYRESM simulations for Caland and Hogarth pit lakes, including constraining seep and groundwater volumes and chemistry, on site meteorological monitoring and measurement of the light extinction coefficient. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A sincere thanks is due to Dr. Andrew Conly for assistance, instruction and constructive criticism. Rob Purdon and Brian Jackson for their help and insight into the study site, Lindsay Moore for assistance in the field, Dr. Mary Louise Hill for her support and encouragement. A special thanks to my husband, family and friends for your support, encouragement and days spent watching Leif. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Title page i Abstract ii Acknowledgements v Table of Contents vi List of Figures viii List of Tables xii List of Appendices xiii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 General Introduction Regarding the Hydrodynamics of Pit Lakes 1 1.2 Scope of Study 7 Chapter 2: Background Information 10 2.1 Location 10 2.2 Geologic Setting 10 2.3 Hydrologic Setting 18 2.4 Previous Research 22 2.4.1 Previous Rebound Models 26 Chapter 3: Rebound and Water Balance Models 29 3.1 General Introduction and Scope of Work 29 3.2 Conceptual Model 30 3.3 Stage - Volume Relationships 32 3.4 Water Balance 36 3.5 Determination of Meteorological Parameters 38 3.5.1 Precipitation 38 3.5.2 Evaporation 43 3.6 Rebound Models and Calibration 46 3.6.1 Models 46 3.6.2 Calibration 47 3.7 Sensitivity Analysis 48 3.8 Results 49 3.8.1 Summary of This Study's Predictions 49 3.8.2 Comparison of This Study's Predictions to Measured Water Elevations 52 3.8.3 Comparison of This Study's and the Regional Engineering Model's Predictions 53 3.8.4 Sensitivity Analysis Results 55 3.9 Discussion 60 3.9.1 Study Results 60 3.9.2 Sensitivity Analysis 66 3.9.3 Model Limitations 69 vi 3.10 Conclusions 71 Chapter 4: Hydrodynamic Modeling 72 4.1 Description of the Limnological Program DYRESM 73 4.2 Description of the Limnological Program DYRESM 74 4.3 Description of DYRESM Input Files and Their Creation 74 4.3.1 Configuration 75 4.3.2 Physical Data and Lake Morphometry 76 4.3.3 Initial Profile 77 4.3.4 Meteorological Data 77 4.3.5 Stream Inflow 79 4.3.6 Withdrawals 80 4.3.7 Parameters 81 4.4 Simulated Scenarios 81 4.4.1 Scenario 1 - Current Conditions 81 4.4.2 Scenario 2: Future Conditions When Pit Lakes Join 84 4.4.3 Scenario 3: Future Conditions When Pit Lake Outflow to the West Arm 85 4.5 Results 86 4.5.1 Scenario 1 86 4.5.2 Scenario 2 95 4.5.3 Scenario 3 98 4.6 Discussion 105 4.6.1 Study results 105 4.6.2 Implications for the Future Toxicity of Caland and Hogarth Ill 4.6.3 Limitations of the study and future work 117 4.7 Conclusions 123 Chapter 5: General Conclusions 126 References 129 Appendices 136 vii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1: Map showing the four open pits on the former Steep Rock Iron Mines property.
Recommended publications
  • Water Management of the Steep Rock Iron Mines at Atikokan, Ontario During Construction, Operations, and After Mine Abandonment
    Proceedings of the 25th Annual British Columbia Mine Reclamation Symposium in Campbell River, BC, 2001. The Technical and Research Committee on Reclamation WATER MANAGEMENT OF THE STEEP ROCK IRON MINES AT ATIKOKAN, ONTARIO DURING CONSTRUCTION, OPERATIONS, AND AFTER MINE ABANDONMENT V. A. Sowa, P. Eng., F.E.I.C. 1 R. B. Adamson, P. Eng.2 A.W. Chow, P. Eng.3 1 Jacques Whitford and Associates Limited, Vancouver, British Columbia 2 Adamson Consulting, Thunder Bay, Ontario 3 Northwest Region, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Thunder Bay, Ontario ABSTRACT The Steep Rock Iron Mines at Atikokan, Ontario operated from 1944 to 1979. The iron ore was located at the bottom of Steep Rock Lake and water management was a key factor in developing the mines. Open pit mining required a massive water diversion scheme, including the diversion of the Seine River, draining of Steep Rock Lake, and construction of various dams and other diversion structures. In order to abandon the mine, the Province of Ontario required a suitable abandonment and long-term water management plan, and assessment of the condition of the various water control and diversion structures. Reclamation of the Seine River to its original course was not possible and, consequently, the water control structures, primarily dams and tunnels, will be operating in perpetuity. The water management during the development of the mines and during operations is described, as well as some insight into future water management options after abandonment. INTRODUCTION The richest undeveloped deposit of hematite iron ore on the North American continent at the time was discovered in 1938 beneath Steep Rock Lake, near Atikokan, Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    2004 to 2014 Seine River Water Management Plan _________________________________________________________________ TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page # i. Executive Summary of the Draft Water Management 1 Plan 1 Approval Pages 1.1 Signature Page – WMP Author, Abitibi 5 Consolidated, Valerie Falls, MNR 1.2 Signature Page – Public Advisory Committees, 7 First Nations 1.3 Signature Page – Chiefs, Lac des Mille Lacs 9 First Nation and Seine River First Nation 2 Introduction 2.1 Watershed Location 11 2.2 Goal and Guiding Principles of Water 13 Management Planning 2.3 The Terms of Reference 14 2.4 Summary of the Planning Process 15 3 History of Waterpower Development and Operations 3.1 Brief History of Operations on the Seine River 18 3.2 Description of Reservoirs and Control Structures 19 3.3 Pre-plan Water Management on the Seine River 29 4 Physical and Biological Descriptions 4.1 Physical Description 40 4.2 Climate 43 4.3 Biological Description 44 4.4 Valued Ecosystem Components 49 4.5 Effects of Waterpower Facilities and Water 52 Control Structures on Riverine Ecosystem 5 Social-Economic Description and Profile 5.1 Community Profiles 58 5.1.1 Upsala and Surrounding Areas 58 5.1.2 First Nations 59 5.1.3 Atikokan 62 5.2 Economic and Social Values 63 6 Issues Identified Through Scoping 6.1 Compilation of Issues 71 i 2004 to 2014 Seine River Water Management Plan _________________________________________________________________ 6.2 Spatial & Temporal Assessment 79 6.3 Issues not addressed in Planning 80 7 Plan Objectives 7.1 Developing the Objectives
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery of a Wild Rice Stand Following Mechanical Removal of Narrowleaf Cattail
    Recovery of a Wild Rice Stand following Mechanical Removal of Narrowleaf Cattail Prepared for: International Joint Commission By: Kristi E. Dysievick, Peter F. Lee and John Kabatay April, 2016 Seine River First Nation Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.0 Objectives................................................................................................................................. 7 3.0 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................... 7 3.1.0 Study Area ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3.2 Field Procedures ............................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.1 Cutting of Cattails ...................................................................................................................... 9 3.2.2 Pore water Collection ................................................................................................................. 9 3.2.3 Sediment/Plant Tissue Collection ............................................................................................ 10 3.3 Laboratory Procedures
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule C [Unconsolidated Acts and Parts of Acts Passed Since 1867 That Still Have Effect] Ontario
    Ontario: Revised Statutes 1980 Schedule C [Unconsolidated Acts and parts of Acts passed since 1867 that still have effect] Ontario © Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1980 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso Bibliographic Citation Repository Citation Ontario (1980) "Schedule C [Unconsolidated Acts and parts of Acts passed since 1867 that still have effect]," Ontario: Revised Statutes: Vol. 1980: Iss. 9, Article 38. Available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso/vol1980/iss9/38 This Appendix is brought to you for free and open access by the Statutes at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ontario: Revised Statutes by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. SCHEDULEC SHOWING PROVISIONS OF PUBLIC ACTS PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF ONTARIO AFTER THE lST DAY OF JULY, 1867 THAT ARE UNCONSOLIDATED AND THAT STILL HA VE EFFECT. ' THIS SCHEDULE DOES NOT CONTAIN REFERENCES TO PRIVATE ACTS. A TABLE OF PRIVAT1'~ ACTS IS SET OUT BEGINNING AT PAGE 533. Year Regnal Year Chapter Name of Act Part still having effect 1868 31 Victoria 20 Registration of Titles (Ontario) Act s.55 - part beginning with "Provided" in the fifteenth line 1869 33 Victoria 9 An Act respecting Law Fees and Trust Funds s.3 1871-72 35 Victoria 20 An Act to make provision for payment of Law s.3 Fees in territorial and judicial districts by means of stamps and to amend the Act respecting Law Fees and Trust Funds 1873 36 Victoria 33 An Act to provide for the establishment of a Whole, except ss.13-15,
    [Show full text]
  • INTERNATIONAL RAINY LAKE BOARD of CONTROL INTERNATIONAL RAINY RIVER WATER POLLUTION BOARD Fall 2011 REPORT
    INTERNATIONAL RAINY LAKE BOARD OF CONTROL INTERNATIONAL RAINY RIVER WATER POLLUTION BOARD Fall 2011 REPORT Submitted to The International Joint Commission Sept 29, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 2 AMBIENT ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING IN 2010 ......................................................... 1 2.1 Water Quality Monitoring – MPCA...........................................................................................1 2.2 Water Quality Monitoring –EC .................................................................................................4 2.3 Water Quality Monitoring –USGS.............................................................................................5 2.4 Tributary Monitoring Program‐ OMOE .....................................................................................6 2.5 Fish Consumption Advisories....................................................................................................7 2.6 Environmental Effects Monitoring............................................................................................7 3 POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES............................................................................................ 8 3.1 Minnesota Municipal Sources ................................................................................................10 3.2 Ontario Municipal Sources .....................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Finlayson L. Area
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Malartic Corporation
    Submitted as part of the Version 3 HRGP Amended EIS/EA Documentation January 2018 – 1656263 AMENDED EIS/EA REPORT CHAPTER 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS VERSION 3 VERSION 3 UPDATE SUMMARY Information / Clarification – Existing Conditions Some comments were received from the joint federal and provincial review team and from the public and Aboriginal stakeholders regarding the existing conditions on site. In some instances, clarification was requested; in other instances, CMC has continued to gather information either in response to requests from the GRT, or as part of ongoing site monitoring. References are provided periodically within Chapter 3 to direct the reader to the most recent information available, within the documentation of the subject matter. ---------- 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS Chapter 3 provides a description of the environmental and socio-economic conditions in the area surrounding the Project, drawing from detailed discipline-specific assessments presented in 15 Technical Support Documents (TSDs). Extensive reference is made to specific TSDs throughout the chapter and the TSDs should be consulted for more detailed information. The existing conditions are defined on the basis of existing information available from a number of sources, including government agencies datasets, scientific literature, modelling, and extensive field studies conducted at the Project Site from 2010 through 2013. The overall approach and objectives of the existing conditions description are provided in Section 2.3. 3.1 Project Site Overview The Project is located in the Seine River watershed (6,250 km2) in northwestern Ontario. The project location is shown in Figure 1-1. The Seine River originates in the Savanne River at Raith, flows east-west for about 250 km and empties into Rainy Lake near Fort Frances and the Canada-U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Gold Mine in Kenora
    VOLUME 14 / ISSUE 1 Fall/Winter 2009 AN OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ONTARIO PROSPECTORS ASSOCIATION BBUILDINGUILDING A GGOLDOLD MMINEINE IINN KKENORAENORA – One Property aatt a TTimeime | Brett Resources Project Advances | Sage Gold Active in Greenstone | Get a Handle on Material Handling | What Caracle Creek Learned from the Downturn | New Kenora Gold Camp in the Making your exploration advantage... Geotech’s Passive EM Technique - ZTEM has been successful at detecting targets at depths in excess of 1500m. Ideal for Porphyry, SEDEX, VMS, Oil and Gas, Uranium and The next “Super Conductors”. advancement in Let nothing go undetected, choose one of Geotech’s Airborne EM patented and award winning airborne techniques. Worldwide Airborne Geophysical Surveys ZTEM VTEM AirMt Airborne Gravity Airborne Gradient Magnetometer Airborne Radiometrics Data Processing Interpretation Modeling Read about our customers’ discoveries at www.geotech.ca North America +1 905.841.5004 30 Systems Worldwide HIGH RESOLUTION, DEEP PENETRATION 424945_Geotech.indd 1 3/31/09 2:08:58 AM S AFE, RELIABLE, EFFICIENT, HELICOPTER SERVICE FLEET • AS350 series including AS350B2 • Bell 206 series • Diamond Drill Support • Airborne Surveys • Aerial Construction www.foresthelicopters.com HEAD OFFICE: 422 Anderson Road, Kenora, Ontario P9N 0E7 tel (807) 548-5647 • fax (807) 548-8362 • e-mail [email protected] N.W. ONTARIO BASES: Kenora (807) 548-5647 • Pickle Lake (807) 928-2735 410134_ForestHelicopters.indd 1 11/25/08 2:01:31 PM DISCOVER THE WORLD LEADER IN UNDERGROUND
    [Show full text]