Ecological Values and Conservation Significance of Crown Land Adjoining Black Hill Conservation Park

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Values and Conservation Significance of Crown Land Adjoining Black Hill Conservation Park Ecological Values and Conservation significance of Crown Land adjoining Black Hill Conservation Park Report compiled by Dr Wendy Stubbs, Luke Price and Janine Kraehenbuehl September 2013 Executive summary Recent preliminary surveys of plants, birds, amphibians and reptiles on two parcels of crown land adjoining Black Hill Conservation Park have revealed a quality suite of species not recorded elsewhere in the state. The addition of these two parcels of land to Black Hill Conservation Park would be significant as it would greatly increase the viability of local plant and animal populations and thus the capacity of the reserve to conserve species into the future. Particular qualities to note include: Breeding population of Mt Lofty Ranges chestnut-rumped heathwrens – a regionally endemic species listed as endangered under the EPBC Act and one of the states most threatened birds. Unusually high diversity of reptiles not seen elsewhere in the region. A unique assemblage of plant species not seen anywhere apart from on these two parcels of crown land due to the unusual presence of limestone bedrock. Stands of ancient grass trees which are expected to predate colonisation. Forty four plant species threatened at a state or regional level (with additional surveys likely to detect more). Looking east along Gorge road on crown land parcel F171413 A91. Photo: S. Collard. Uniqueness of these parcels The area encapsulated within the crown land parcels F107799 A6 and F171413 A91 (Figure 1) is unique in the region as it represents the only area of a dryland community within a high rainfall zone observed within the state. This area consists of rocky shallow alkaline soils across mainly north facing slopes. While the Adelaide Mount Lofty Ranges (AMLR) typically has acidic soils, these two parcels of land are dominated by limestone, a feature not observed within Black Hill Conservation Park itself, and not conserved within the reserve system anywhere else within this region. The distinctiveness of these two parcels therefore represent a critical addition to Black Hill Conservation Park. Figure 1: Selected broad vegetation associations within crown land parcels F107799 A6 and F171413 A91. Area A = drooping sheoak and yacca heath, Area B = drooping sheoak woodland with grey Trymalium and Mount Lofty grass trees, Area C = grey Trymalium shrubland, Area D = grey Trymalium and dryland teatree shrubland, Area E = drooping sheoak and mixed Eucalyptus woodland, Area F = Mount Lofty grass tree with sticky hop bush low open shrubland, Area G = mallee box woodland , and Area H =. silver banksia low woodland with drooping sheoak, See Price et al. (2013a) for a full description of each vegetation association. Large expanses of these parcels of land are dominated by grey Trymalium (Trymalium wayae) shrub-land (Figure 2) with a variety of co-dominant plants including dryland tea tree (Melaleuca lanceolata),drooping sheoak (Allocasuarina verticillata) and grass trees (Xanthorrhoea semiplana ssp. semiplana and Xanthorrhoea quadrangulata) (Figure 1). This association of species is extremely rare and this crown land represents the only area within the AMLR region where it exists. While some of the same species are found further north within the Flinders Ranges, the vegetation association found within this crown land differs significantly from similar vegetation associations in the Flinders Ranges making this area quite unique (Brewer 2001). This association contains several species that have limited distribution at a state, district and local level, and it contains many species typically found within mallee systems which are not common in the AMLR (Brewer 2001). Figure 2: A patch of grey Trymalium shrubland containing Mount Lofty grass-trees in F171413 A91. Photo: L. Price Scattered across these two parcels of land are numerous stands of large grass trees, with some individuals over 6 feet in height (Figure 3). Due to the slow growing nature of these plants, it is believed that these individuals would be more than 100 years old, and they are likely to predate European settlement (H Vonow 2013, pers. comm. SA State Herbarium). While the two species of grass trees are also found within Black Hill Conservation Park, the individuals found within the crown land are significantly larger than any found within the park and are larger than any preserved anywhere else in this region or the Flinders Ranges. Figure 3: A stand of Mount Lofty grass-trees which stand over 6 ft tall in F171413 A91. Photo: L. Price. Several other community types found within these parcels of land are considered threatened at a state and regional scale. For example, Banksia marginata grassy low woodland which is found in the northernmost tip of F107799 A6 (area H on figure 1) is considered endangered across the state and is very significant for this region (Wilson and Bignall 2009). Mallee Box (Eucalyptus porosa) grassy woodland which is found in the north western section of F107799 A6 (area G on figure 1) is also considered threatened within the region. The lower drainage lines of F171413 A91 contain redgum (Eucalyptus camaldulensis) grassy woodlands while the ridge top in the eastern section of F107799 A6 consists of SA blue gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon) grassy woodland (Brewer 2001). While these communities are not listed as threatened, grassy woodlands per se are particularly under-represented in the AMLR. Grassy woodlands used to occupy 47% of this region, with only 7% of this area now remaining (representing 27% of the remnant total). Despite historically covering nearly half of the Mount Lofty Ranges, only 3,709 ha is currently under formal protection (14% of the remaining 7%) (DEH 2009). Due to this disproportionate clearance and the limited extent formally protected, a DENR publication identifies both grassy woodlands and shrublands as two of the three most important community types for formal protection (out of 13 community types). Birds While extensive fauna surveys have not yet been conducted across this crown land, an initial bird survey undertaken by NCSSA in September 2013 identified 41 species of native bird utilising this site. Observations of the habitats across this area suggest another sixteen species are likely to inhabit this area and may well be detected if subsequent surveys were undertaken at other times of the year (Collard 2013, J. van Weenen 2013, pers. comm.). The vegetation found throughout these two parcels of land are dominated by dry low open shrubs. This open low shrubby habitat is particularly important for a suite of birds that is found along the dry ridge tops along the spine of the Mount Lofty Ranges, and due to the limited availability of this habitat is now in decline. Of the forty one species observed during the spring 2013 bird survey, six species had federal, state or regional conservation ratings (Table 1). Nine of the species likely to be detected if more surveys were undertaken are also considered in decline within this region (including elegant parrot, sacred kingfisher, white-naped honeyeater, and dusky woodswallow), with one species being considered rare across the state (scarlet robin). All of these species have shown marked declines in response to fragmentation and modification in the highly fragmented and modified Mount Lofty Ranges landscape (Paton et al. 1994). Table 1. Threatened bird species recorded in the study area during the survey in September 2013. Taken from Collard (2013). E = endangered, V = vulnerable, R = rare, U = uncommon. EPBC ratings range from critically endangered, endangered to vulnerable; State ratings range from endangered, vulnerable to rare and AMLR ratings range from endangered, vulnerable, rare to uncommon (Wilson and Bignall 2009). Species EPBC SA AMLR Chestnut-rumped heathwren E E V Yellow-tailed black-cockatoo V V Peregrine falcon R R Fan-tailed cuckoo V Shining bronze-cuckoo R Yellow-rumped thornbill U Mount Lofty Ranges Chestnut-rumped heathwren – endangered under EPBC Act The Mount Lofty Ranges Chestnut-rumped heathwren which is listed as endangered under both the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 (second most threatened rating) and the South Australian National Parks and Wildlife Act 1972 (highest threat rating), has been recorded on both of these parcels of land (Collard 2013). This subspecies, Hylacola pyrrhopygia parkeri (Figure 4), is only found within the Mount Lofty Ranges, and the preservation of this species is one of the region’s highest conservation priorities, as fewer than 1,000 individuals are believed to remain. Unfortunately this species appears to be experiencing ongoing decline, with a reduction in total population from 2,500 to 1,000 over seven years (2000 to 2007). The primary cause of this decline is believed to be habitat loss and fragmentation outside of the reserve system (Long and Bentley 2010). Therefore, preserving all remaining suitable habitat for this species is critical to ensure their survival. Figure 4: Juvenile Mount Lofty Ranges chestnut-rumped heathwren in Scott Creek Conservation Park. Photo: D. Moise. Two observations were made of Mount Lofty Ranges chestnut-rumped heathwren within the subject land, both within dense shrubby habitat in rocky areas with Trymallium wayi, Allocasuarina verticillata and Dodonea viscosa the dominant plant species. This species occupies a very small home range so as one of the two birds observed was a juvenile, it is evident that chestnut-rumped heathwren are breeding within this subject area. Previous studies have identified that the largest population of this species exists within the area from Black Hill Conservation Park to Cleland Conservation Park (Pickett 2007), making this area a priority for conservation of this species. Moreover, these parcels of crown land provide an extremely important linkage between populations of this species found in Anstey Hill Recreation Park to the north and populations within Black Hill and Moriatla Conservation Parks to the south (Collard 2013). An EPBC Act referral would need to be lodged with the Commonwealth Government before any modifications could be made to this area.
Recommended publications
  • Remnant Native Vegetation Plan
    Page 42 REMNANT NATIVE VEGETATION PLAN 2018 to 2023 Page 43 Contents Purpose of the Remnant Native Vegetation Plan ............................................................................ 3 What is Biodiversity? .................................................................................................................... 4 Landscape of the City of Marion .................................................................................................... 5 Pre-European Vegetation of the City of Marion ........................................................................... 5 Kaurna People Managed the Landscape .................................................................................... 5 Our Remaining Native Vegetation .............................................................................................. 6 Pre-European Vegetation Types of the City of Marion ..................................................................... 7 The Hallett Headland .................................................................................................................... 8 Values of our Remnant Vegetation ................................................................................................ 9 Vegetation of Significance – Grassy Woodlands and Grassy Habitats ......................................... 9 Greybox Grassy Woodlands ..................................................................................................... 10 Vegetation of Significance – Coastal Heathlands ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • INDIGENOUS Tube Stocklist 2019 Plants from the Greater Melbourne Area
    INDIGENOUS tube stocklist 2019 plants from the greater Melbourne area Kuranga Native Nursery grows an extensive If you are requiring a species not listed, please range of plants which occur naturally in the enquire as it may still be available. Greater Melbourne area. Bushfood plants are We have a range of books for sale which list marked # (refer to details on back page). the indigenous plants of various areas around All plants on this list are grown in 50 mm (2”) Melbourne. square forestry tubes. The seed and All tubes are $2.95 each except those marked cutting material for most of our tube stock with * which are $3.95 each has originated from the Melbourne metropolitan area. 118 York Rd Mt Evelyn Victoria 3796 Tel:9760 8100 www.kuranga.com.au All tubes are $2.95 except those marked with * which are $3.95 each. Total price including GST. # Bushfood plants Bird attracting plants AQUATICS AND BOG PLANTS (located near pond) Baloskion tetraphyllum* Tassel Cord-rush Lovely clump, decorative foliage, reddish/brown tassels Sp-S. Shallow water. Carex appressa Tall Sedge Tussock. 40-60cm x 40-60cm. Yellow/brownish spikelets Sp-S. Moist-wet. Carex breviculmis Short-stem Sedge Tufted sedge 15cm high. Flr spikes Sp-S. Moist depressions to exposed slopes. Carex fascicularis Tassel Sedge Drooping spikelets Sp-S. 1m x 1m. Sun or shade. Pond or bog plant. Carex gaudichaudiana* Tufted Sedge Tufted sedge.10-90cm high. Erect flr spikes Sp-S. Sun, semi-shade. Water’s edge, bog. Carex tasmanica Curly Sedge Tufted sedge to 40cm high.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Overview of the Taxonomy and Nomenclature of the Genus
    Australasian Journal of Herpetology 57 Australasian Journal of Herpetology 34:57-63. ISSN 1836-5698 (Print) Published 20 July 2017. ISSN 1836-5779 (Online) A brief overview of the taxonomy and nomenclature of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato, with the formal naming of a new subgenus for the Diplodactylus byrnei Lucas and Frost, 1896 species group and two new species within this subgenus. RAYMOND T. HOSER 488 Park Road, Park Orchards, Victoria, 3134, Australia. Phone: +61 3 9812 3322 Fax: 9812 3355 E-mail: snakeman (at) snakeman.com.au Received 25 March 2017, Accepted 28 May 2017, Published 20 July 2017. ABSTRACT The taxonomy of the genus Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato was well resolved at the genus level by Oliver et al. (2007) and to a lesser extent other authors over the past 30 years to 2017. However a group known as the Wüster gang as detailed by Hoser (2015a-f) have unlawfully stopped most herpetologists from using taxonomy and nomenclature proposed by authors outside of their mob. As a result names formally proposed by Wells and Wellington (1989) for obvious species groups have been forcibly suppressed in herpetology since they were first published. This has remained the case even after Oliver et al. (2007) confirmed the validity of their genus-level classification in terms of three names they proposed. Taking an ultra-conservative position, Oliver et al. (2007) split Diplodactylus Gray 1832 sensu lato into three genera, using the first available names of Diplodactylus Gray 1832, Lucasium Wermuth, 1965 and Rhynchoedura Günther, 1867 for three main groups that diverged from one another in excess of 20 MYA.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Flora
    Regional Species Conservation Assessments DENR South East Region Complete Dataset for all Flora Assessments Dec 2011 In Alphabetical Order of Species Name MAP ID FAMILY NAME PLANT FORM NSX CODE SPECIES NAME COMMON NAME SOUTH EAST Regional EAST SOUTH Status Regional EAST SOUTH Status Score Regional Trend EAST SOUTH Score Regional EAST SOUTH Status+Trend Score SOUTH EAST Regional Trend EAST SOUTH FAMILY FAMILY NUMBER (CENSUS OF SA) EPBCACTSTATUSCODE NPWACTSTATUSCODE LASTOBSERVED_in_SE TOTAL_in_SA TOTAL_in_SE %_SOUTH_EAST_REGION EofO_in_SE_All_km2 EofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 AofO_in_SE_All_km2 AofO_in_SE_Recent_km2 711 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes Y01536 Acacia acinacea Wreath Wattle 2009 814 60 7.37 3000 1700 48 27 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 712 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01545 Acacia brachybotrya Grey Mulga-bush 2001 563 18 3.20 800 500 16 9 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 713 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01554 Acacia continua Thorn Wattle 1974 836 1 0.12 100 1 VU 4 DD 0.0 4.0 714 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05237 Acacia cupularis Cup Wattle 2002 577 83 14.38 4700 1500 65 20 LC 1 0 0.3 1.3 716 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01561 Acacia dodonaeifolia Hop-bush Wattle R 2002 237 33 13.92 800 400 19 6 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 718 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01562 Acacia enterocarpa Jumping-jack Wattle EN E 2008 92 16 17.39 700 400 10 7 VU 4 0 0.3 4.3 719 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05985 Acacia euthycarpa Wallowa 1992 681 7 1.03 500 100 7 1 RA 3 - 0.4 3.4 720 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes S01565 Acacia farinosa Mealy Wattle 1997 325 88 27.08 4000 1600 65 23 NT 2 0 0.3 2.3 721 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Study Group Field Trip Report
    Eremophila Study Group Newsletter 118 November 2017 ISSN-0811-529X Australian Native Plants Society (Australia) (ANPSA) Eremophila Study Group Newsletter No. 118 Study Group members on the road north of Port Augusta Lyndal Thorburn, Ken Warnes, Bev Rice and Bevan Buirchell at the ESG Field Trip A new hybrid ................................................. 18 Contents Study Group Field Trip Report ...................... 18 Letter from the Editor ...................................... 2 Events............................................................. 19 What’s New in the Study Group ...................... 2 From Your letters ........................................... 21 Keying Eremophila .......................................... 2 Future Newsletter Themes ............................. 25 Feature species – E. calorhabdos ..................... 7 Financial Report 2016-17 .............................. 26 A Note about Drought-hardiness ................... 10 Errata .............................................................. 27 E. hygrophana seedlings ................................ 11 About the Study Group .................................. 28 A Trip in Western Australia .......................... 13 1 | P a g e Eremophila Study Group Newsletter 118 November 2017 ISSN-0811-529X Letter from the Editor What’s New in the Study Group Welcome to the November 2017 edition of the New members Eremophila Study Group Newsletter. Welcome to new members Jill Bartlett (Vic), I write following our successful member field Simon Brown (NT), Bevan
    [Show full text]
  • Avis Liste Positive Reptiles
    Avis de la Commission bruxelloise des Parcs zoologiques (12/11/2019) Liste positive des reptiles pour la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale CONTENU I. Avant-propos .................................................................................................................................... 2 II. Liste positive des reptiles à Bruxelles .............................................................................................. 2 III. Critères d’évaluation pour établir la liste positive ............................................................................ 3 IV. Comité d'experts .............................................................................................................................. 4 V. Formulaires de demande et description des procédures de demande ........................................... 5 Procédure de demande pour la détention d’une espèce ne figurant pas sur la liste positive des reptiles ................................................................................................................................................. 5 Procédure de demande d’inscription d’une nouvelle espèce .............................................................. 6 VI. Points supplémentaires à considérer............................................................................................... 6 Normes de détention ........................................................................................................................... 6 Cadre danger pour l’homme ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Extinction of Mutualistic Species – an Analysis of Ornithophilous Angiosperms in New Zealand
    DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES CO-EXTINCTION OF MUTUALISTIC SPECIES An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand Sandra Palmqvist Degree project for Master of Science (120 hec) with a major in Environmental Science ES2500 Examination Course in Environmental Science, 30 hec Second cycle Semester/year: Spring 2021 Supervisor: Søren Faurby - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences Examiner: Johan Uddling - Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences “Tui. Adult feeding on flax nectar, showing pollen rubbing onto forehead. Dunedin, December 2008. Image © Craig McKenzie by Craig McKenzie.” http://nzbirdsonline.org.nz/sites/all/files/1200543Tui2.jpg Table of Contents Abstract: Co-extinction of mutualistic species – An analysis of ornithophilous angiosperms in New Zealand ..................................................................................................... 1 Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning: Samutrotning av mutualistiska arter – En analys av fågelpollinerade angiospermer i New Zealand ................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 2. Material and methods ............................................................................................................... 7 2.1 List of plant species, flower colours and conservation status ....................................... 7 2.1.1 Flower Colours .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Powerful Pollinators Pollinators – Mostly Insects, but Also Birds Provide Floral Resources for Pollinators
    Metropolitan & Greater Melbourne: South East Buzz pollination use that skill to buzz pollen from the Wholesale Nurseries anthers of native plants. Encouraging pollinators in your garden Most of the plants shown in the The power of Some flowers do not produce any Planting buzz-pollinated species planting guide will be available at nectar; they specifically target pollen- Create pollination reservoirs Construct insect real estate Get to know your local flora will encourage populations of buzz nurseries that have a good stock of pollinators collecting bees, and only offer pollen Pollination reservoirs are areas that Insect hotels, which are both functional Your local government area has distinct pollinators for successful pollination of native plants. But if your local nursery rewards. To limit pollen loss and ensure Powerful pollinators Pollinators – mostly insects, but also birds provide floral resources for pollinators. and attractive, are a great way to populations of insects, depending food crops and ensure seed set in native doesn’t stock the plant you’re after, effective pollination, some plants and mammals – assist the formation of They can be gardens, new planting add to habitat and nesting places for on the local flora and environment. plants. Many small ground nesting bees ask them to order it in. For a list of produce flowers with specialised, seeds and fruit in many plant species or existing habitat such as established pollinators and insects in your backyard Knowing your local insect species will also buzz pollinate native flowers. wholesale nurseries Encouraging insect pollinators in urban environments & gardens tubular anthers, that only open at the by visiting flowers in search of food trees, or even local bushland, parks or garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Angas Processing Facility Miscellaneous Purposes License Application 2019/0826
    APPENDIX Q4 STRATHALBYN MINING LEASE FLORA ASSESSMENT 2011 ANGAS PROCESSING FACILITY MISCELLANEOUS PURPOSES LICENSE APPLICATION 2019/0826 ABN | 67 062 576 238 Unit 7 / 202-208 Glen Osmond Road | Fullarton SA 5063 Strathalbyn Mining Lease Flora Assessment 1 Strathalbyn Mining Lease Flora Assessment 25 July 2011 Version 2 Prepared by EBS Ecology for Terramin Australia Pty Ltd Document Control Version Date issued Authors Reviewed by Date Reviewed Revision type 1 27/07/2011 T. Brown C. Lynch 27/07/2011 Draft 2 11/08/2011 T. Brown Final Distribution of Copies Version Date issued Media Issued to 1 27/07/2011 Electronic Matt Daniel, Terramin Australia Pty Ltd. 2 11/08/2011 Electronic Matt Daniel, Terramin Australia Pty Ltd. COPYRIGHT: Use or copying of this document in whole or in part (including photographs) without the written permission of EBS Ecology constitutes an infringement of copyright. LIMITATION: This report has been prepared on behalf of and for the exclusive use of EBS Ecology’s Client, and is subject to and issued in connection with the provisions of the agreement between EBS Ecology and its Client. EBS Ecology accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for or in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any third party. CITATION: EBS Ecology (2011) Strathalbyn Mining Lease Flora Assessment. Report to Terramin Australia Pty Ltd. EBS Ecology, Adelaide. Front cover photo: View of Lignum tall shrubland community at the western end of the seasonal wetland basin. Strathalbyn Mining Lease Flora Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An ecological assessment was undertaken for a low-lying seasonal wetland basin south of the Alexandrina Council sewage ponds in Strathalbyn, South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide & Mt Lofty Ranges Flora
    Regional Species Conservation Assessments Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Region Complete Dataset for all Flora Assessments February 2014 In Alphabetical Order of Species Name SPECIES MAP ID MAP OF (CENSUS NUMBER FAMILY SA) FAMILY NAME FORM PLANT NSXCODE COMMON NAME CODE STATUS ACT EPBC CODE STATUS ACT NPW in AMLR OBSERVED LAST DATE in SA TOTAL Project in AMLR Area TOTAL Project% AMLR Area AMLR_AofO_All_km2 AMLR_AofO_Recent_km2 Regional Status AMLR Regional StatusAMLR Score Regional Trend AMLR Regional Score Trend AMLR Regional Status+Trend AMLR Score 770 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes Y01536 Acacia acinacea Wreath Wattle 2013 1214 539 44.40 305 268 RA 3 - 0.4 3.4 772 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes A01540 Acacia argyrophylla Silver Mulga-bush 2012 348 121 34.77 78 49 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 773 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01545 Acacia brachybotrya Grey Mulga-bush 2005 955 41 4.29 24 10 VU 4 - 0.4 4.4 775 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes M01554 Acacia continua Thorn Wattle 2013 926 186 20.09 84 81 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 776 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05237 Acacia cupularis Cup Wattle 2009 692 73 10.55 49 36 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 778 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K01561 Acacia dodonaeifolia Hop-bush Wattle R 2009 242 73 30.17 46 29 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 779 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes C05985 Acacia euthycarpa Wallowa 2009 768 148 19.27 76 26 RA 3 0 0.3 3.3 780 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes S01565 Acacia farinosa Mealy Wattle 2001 429 6 1.40 4 2 EN 5 - 0.4 5.4 782 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes Z01571 Acacia gunnii Ploughshare Wattle R 2012 115 113 98.26 48 48 EN 5 - 0.4 5.4 783 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes Q01572 Acacia hakeoides Hakea Wattle 1999 1846 17 0.92 13 3 VU 4 DD 0.0 4.0 784 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes U05438 Acacia halliana Hall's Wattle 1963 258 2 0.78 2 VU 4 DD 0.0 4.0 787 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes E05238 Acacia ligulata Umbrella Bush 2013 5967 124 2.08 70 58 RA 3 - 0.4 3.4 788 91.182 LEGUMINOSAE legumes K03753 Acacia longifolia ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Positieve Lijst Reptielen Vlaanderen 2019.Pdf
    HAGEDISSEN Orde Suborde Infraorde/SuperfamilieFamilie Subfamilie Soort Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Anatololacerta pelasgiana Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Archaeolacerta bedriagae Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Dalmatolacerta oxycephala Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Eremias przewalskii Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Gastropholis prasina Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Holaspis guentheri Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta bilineata Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta media Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta pamphylica Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta schreiberi Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta strigata Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta trilineata Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta viridis Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Podarcis pityusensis Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Podarcis siculus Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Takydromus sexlineatus Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Takydromus smaragdinus Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Timon lepidus Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Timon nevadensis Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Timon pater Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Timon tangitanus Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae Gallotiinae Gallotia galloti Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae Gallotiinae Psammodromus algirus Squamata Sauria Scincomorpha Lacertidae - Lacerta agilis Squamata
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist Da Flora De Portugal (Continental, Açores E Madeira)
    Checklist da Flora de Portugal (Continental, Açores e Madeira). Coordenação: M. Menezes de Sequeira, D. Espírito-Santo, C. Aguiar, J. Capelo & J. Honrado Autores da Revisão (por ordem alfabética): António Maria Luis Crespi, DEBA, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, [email protected] António Xavier Pereira Coutinho, Departamento de Botânica - Universidade de Coimbra, [email protected] Carlos Aguiar, Departamento de Biologia e Biotecnologia, Escola Superior Agrária de Bragança, Bragança, Escola Superior Agrária de Bragança, Campus de Santa Apolónia, 5301-855 Bragança [email protected] Carlos Neto, CBAA - Centro de Botânica Aplicada à Agricultura e Centro de Estudo Geográficos da Universidade de Lisboa, Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território, Ed. da Fac. Letras, Alameda da Universidade, 1600-214 Lisboa, [email protected] Carlos Pinto-Gomes, Departamento de Paisagem, Ambiente e Ordenamento Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Évora, Rua Romão Ramalho, 59, 7000-671 – Évora, [email protected] Dalila Espírito Santo, CBAA - Centro de Botânica Aplicada à Agricultura e Departamento dos Recursos Naturais, Ambiente e Território, Inst. Sup. Agronomia, Lisboa, [email protected] Eduardo Dias, Universidade dos Açores - Campus de Angra do Heroísmo, Terra-Chã, 9701-851 Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal, [email protected] João Almeida, Departamento de Botânica, faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade de Coimbra, 3000 Coimbra. Portugal. [email protected] João Honrado, CIBIO-Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos and Depto de Botânica da Faculdade de Ciências, Univ. do Porto. Edifício FC4, Rua do Campo Alegre s/n, PT–4169-007 Porto, [email protected] Jorge Capelo, CBAA - Centro de Botânica Aplicada à Agricultura e USPF, L-INIA, INRB, I.P.
    [Show full text]