JEWELRY INDUSTRY IMPACTS a Comparative Case Study of Gold in Peru and Diamonds in Botswana
JEWELRY INDUSTRY IMPACTS A Comparative Case Study of Gold in Peru and Diamonds in Botswana American University’s School of International Service Alexandra Brown, Flora Green, Bwalya Mwaba, Aubrey Peterson & Andre Thomas December 2017 Executive Summary This paper was produced in accordance with a Statement of Work (SOW) issued by the U.S. Department of State and Jóia Consulting to understand the impacts of the diamond industry in Botswana and the gold industry in Peru along their respective value chains. Human security elements will be mapped and assessed in the below analysis, leading to a comparative study and a recommendation for a future Jewelry Development Impact Index (JDII), based on interviews with industry actors, independent desk research, and qualitative assessments. The six sectors that we focused on in our research were based on the United Nations’ Human Security Approach, including: (1) sociocultural, (2) political, (3) economic, (4) human rights, (5) health, and (6) environmental. Key Findings After examining the industry’s sociocultural impacts along the value chain in Botswana and Peru, ethnic compilation, group grievances, and uneven development are the most significant for the JDII. • In both nations, the indigenous populations have been eliminated from the political dialogue in regard to the jewelry industry. Despite this, there are little ethnic and social tensions in Peru and Botswana, unlike other mineral rich nations. Of the political impacts of the jewelry industry, we found that governance, integrity, and civil society participation are the most significant factors for the creation of the JDII. Overall, Botswana has more robust accountability mechanisms and procedures to seek public input on its natural resource governance policies.
[Show full text]