DOCSLIB.ORG

Vertebrate Phylogeny

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vertebrate Phylogeny Vertebrate Phylogeny BIOL 252 AUGUST 23, 2018 DR. STACY FARINA Irisarri et al., Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Sep; 1(9): 1370–1378. Cladogram (or Phylogeny) A B C D E F A hypothesis of evolutionary relationships represented as a tree Cladogram (or Phylogeny) tips nodes branches “Nodes” represent hypothetical common ancestors Cladogram (or Phylogeny) A B C D E F “Tips” can be individuals, species, or large groups of organisms Cladogram (or Phylogeny) Individual B Individual A Individual C Individual D Individual EIndividual F “Tips” can be individuals, species, or large groups of organisms Cladogram (or Phylogeny) Grey seal Harbor seal Weddell seal California sea lionSteller seaWalrus lion “Tips” can be individuals, species, or large groups of organisms Cladogram “Tips” can be individuals, (or species, or large groups Pinnipedia of organisms (seals & sea lions) Phylogeny) Musteloidea (weasels & otters) Ursidae (bears) Canis familiaris (domestic dog) Canis lupus (gray wolf) Vulpes vulpes (red fox) Cladogram “Tips” can be individuals, (or species, or large groups Pinnipedia of organisms (seals & sea lions) Phylogeny) Musteloidea (weasels & otters) Ursidae (bears) Canis familiaris (domestic dog) Canis lupus (gray wolf) NOTE: Vulpes vulpes using “Linnaean ranks” in this class. (red fox) We will not be A clade is a group of organisms that includes an ancestor and all descendants of that ancestor. A B C D E F A clade is a group of organisms that includes an ancestor and all descendants of that ancestor. A B C D E F How many clades are represented on this phylogeny? A clade is a group of organisms that includes an ancestor and all descendants of that ancestor. How many clades are represented on this phylogeny? Clades are monophyletic groups by definition. A monophyletic group includes an ancestor and all descendants of that ancestor. A B C D E F Paraphyletic ancestor and only some descendants. groups Seal are not clades. They include an Sea lion Dog Dolphin Whale Hippo Polyphyletic descendants but not all of their ancestors. groups Seal are not clades. They include some Sea lion Dog Dolphin Whale Hippo Nodes can be “rotated” or flipped and still show the same relationships. Seal Sea lion Dog Dolphin Whale Hippo Nodes can be “rotated” or flipped and still show the same relationships. Dog Seal Sea lion Dolphin Whale Hippo Nodes can be “rotated” or flipped and still show the same relationships. Seal Sea lion Dog Dolphin Whale Hippo Nodes can be “rotated” or flipped and still show the same relationships. Whale Dolphin Hippo Sea lion Seal Dog How are trees used to study anatomy? Convergent evolution evolution of wings Convergent evolution Convergent evolution Homoplasy: noun referring to an instance of convergent evolution Convergent evolution A trait is considered a homoplasy if the common ancestor did not have the trait. Homology Homology: noun referring to an instance of shared ancestry of a trait Homology A trait is considered homologous if it is present in the common ancestor. Homologous as… Convergent as… Homologous as… Convergent as… Homologous to… (same origin) Vestigial Structures A vestigial structure is “invisible” to natural selection (only impacted by drift or mutation) until it affects survival and reproduction. Loss of structures Ear flaps Seal Sea lionDog Dolphin Whale Hippo Stream-lined Stream-lined body shape body shape Seal Aquatic (good swimmers) Sea lion Dog Aquatic (good swimmers) Dolphin Whale Hippo About Linnaean ranks… Class: Aves Class: Reptilia Phylogenies are Hypotheses Synapomorphies • Synapomorphy: Shared, derived trait Where do we fit on the animal tree? DEUTEROSTOMES Vertebrates Tu n i c a t e s Lancelets Echinoderms + Acorn Worms DEUTEROSTOMES Echinoderms + Acorn Worms DEUTEROSTOMES Echinoderms + Acorn Worms DEUTEROSTOMES Chordata Vertebrates Tu n i c a t e s Lancelets DEUTEROSTOMES Chordata Lancelets DEUTEROSTOMES Chordata Tu n i c a t e s Chordata Vertebrates What makes a Tu n i c a t e s chordate? Lancelets Chordate Synapomorphies • Notochord Chordate Synapomorphies • Notochord • Dorsal hollow nerve cord Chordate Synapomorphies • Notochord • Dorsal hollow nerve cord • Pharyngeal gill slits Chordate Synapomorphies • Notochord • Dorsal hollow nerve cord • Pharyngeal gill slits • Subpharyngeal gland Chordate Synapomorphies • Notochord • Dorsal hollow nerve cord • Pharyngeal gill slits • Subpharyngeal gland • Post-anal tail • Notochord • Dorsal hollow nerve cord Vertebrates • Pharyngeal gill slits • Subpharyngeal gland • Post-anal tail What makes a Tu n i c a t e s chordate? Lancelets Larval tunicate: • Notochord • Dorsal hollow nerve cord Vertebrates • Pharyngeal gill slits • Subpharyngeal gland • Post-anal tail Tu n i c a t e s Lancelets *Synapomorphies can be present at any point in development PHYLOGENIES ARE HYPOTHESES Based on anatomical traits Based on DNA similarities (morphological data) (molecular data) Biologists believe that tunicates share a more recent common ancestor with vertebrates, based on molecular data. VERTEBRATES VERTEBRATES Vertebrates What makes a vertebrate? Archosauria Testudines Lepidosauria Mammalia Amphibia What makes a Dipnoi vertebrate? Coelacanthiformes Actinopterygii Chondrichthyes Petromyzontiformes Myxiniformes Urochordata Vertebrate Synapomorphies • Vertebral column Vertebrate Synapomorphies • Vertebral column • Skull - cartilage and/or bone Vertebrate Synapomorphies • Vertebral column • Skull - cartilage and/or bone • Enlarged brain (3-5 divisions) Vertebrate Synapomorphies • Vertebral column • Skull - cartilage and/or bone • Enlarged brain (3-5 divisions) • Neurogenic placodes Vertebrate Synapomorphies • Vertebral column • Skull - cartilage and/or bone • Enlarged brain (3-5 divisions) • Neurogenic placodes • Muscular, chambered heart Vertebrate Synapomorphies • Vertebral column • Skull - cartilage and/or bone • Enlarged brain (3-5 divisions) • Neurogenic placodes • Muscular, chambered heart • Semicircular canals (inner ear) Vertebrate Synapomorphies • Vertebral column • Skull - cartilage and/or bone • Enlarged brain (3-5 divisions) • Neurogenic placodes • Muscular, chambered heart • Semicircular canals (inner ear) • Complex sensory structures –Ears, paired eyes, nose • Specialized digestive organs –Stomach, intestine, liver, and pancreas, Archosauria Testudines Lepidosauria Mammalia Amphibia Dipnoi Coelacanthiformes Actinopterygii Chondrichthyes Petromyzontiformes Cyclostomata Myxiniformes Urochordata Cyclostomata: Living Jawless Fishes Hagfishes (Myxiniformes) Lamprey (Petromyzontiformes) Previous Hypothesis (No longer accepted) Hagfishes (Myxiniformes) Lamprey (Petromyzontiformes) Are hagfish vertebrates? When molecules guide morphological study… Ota et al., 2013. Identification of vertebra-like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfish. Nature Communications 2:373. When molecules guide morphological study… All species of hagfishes have mesenchymal precursors to cartilaginous vertebrae, even though most species don’t develop them Ota et al., 2013. Identification of vertebra-like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfish. Nature Communications 2:373. Hagfish and lamprey likely have lost vertebral elements Ota et al., 2013. Identification of vertebra- like elements and their possible differentiation from sclerotomes in the hagfish. Nature Communications 2:373. Myxiniformes – Hagfishes slime glands eye (reduced gill slits or missing) Hagfish tooth plates (Keratin) keratin tooth plates Hagfish at a whale fall Knotting Petromyzontiformes - Lamprey Lamprey oral disc with keratin teeth Keratin teeth; only in marine species Archosauria Testudines Lepidosauria Mammalia Amphibia Gnathostomes Dipnoi Jaws Coelacanthiformes Actinopterygii Chondrichthyes Petromyzontiformes Myxiniformes Urochordata JAWS GNATHOSTOMATA Gnatho = Jaws Stoma = Mouth Jaws Gnathostomes Placoderms† Ostracoderms† Myxiniformes Petromyzontiformes Evolution of Jaws Jaws allowed Archosauria vertebrates to Testudines capture large and diverse prey, Lepidosauria causing them to Mammalia grow large and diversify in diet. Amphibia Gnathostomes Dipnoi Jawed Vertebrates Jaws Coelacanthiformes (65,000+ species) Actinopterygii Chondrichthyes Petromyzontiformes Lamprey (42 species) Myxiniformes Hagfishes (81 species) Urochordata Gnathostome Synapomorphies • Jaws • Paired nasal openings Gnathostome Synapomorphies • Jaws • Paired nasal openings • Forelimbs and hindlimbs Gnathostome Synapomorphies • Jaws • Paired nasal openings • Forelimbs and hindlimbs • Teeth Archosauria Testudines Lepidosauria Mammalia Amphibia Chondrichthyes Dipnoi Chimeras, sharks, Coelacanthiformes skates, and rays Actinopterygii Chondrichthyes Petromyzontiformes Myxiniformes Urochordata Chondrichthyes Chimeras, sharks, skates, and rays Chondrichthyan synapomorphies • Cartilagenous skeleton Chondrichthyan synapomorphies • Cartilagenous skeleton • Tesselated cartilage Chondrichthyan synapomorphies • Cartilagenous skeleton • Tesselated cartilage Chondrichthyan synapomorphies • Cartilagenous skeleton • Tesselated cartilage • Placoid scales Chondrichthyan synapomorphies • Cartilagenous skeleton • Tesselated cartilage • Placoid scales • Pelvic claspers Holocephala (chimera) characteristics: Head clasper Single gill opening Elasmobranchii Synapomorphy: 5 gill openings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hedges2009chap39.Pdf
    Vertebrates (Vertebrata) S. Blair Hedges Vertebrates are treated here as a separate phylum Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, Pennsylvania State rather than a subphylum of Chordata. 7 e morpho- University, University Park, PA 16802-5301, USA ([email protected]) logical disparity among the chordates (urochordates, cepahalochordates, and vertebrates), and their deep time of separation based on molecular clocks (5) is as great Abstract as that among other groups of related animal phyla (e.g., The vertebrates (~58,000 sp.) comprise a phylum of mostly arthropods, tardigrades, and onycophorans). 7 e phyl- mobile, predatory animals. The evolution of jaws and ogeny of the lineages covered here is uncontroversial, for limbs were key traits that led to subsequent diversifi cation. the most part. Evidence from nuclear genes and morph- Atmospheric oxygen change appears to have played a major ology (1, 2, 6, 7) agree in the backbone phylogeny of ver- role, with an initial rise in the late Precambrian (~580–542 tebrates represented by these nested groups: Tetrapoda million years ago, Ma) permitting larger body size, followed (Lissamphibia, Amniota), Sarcopterygii (Actinistia, by two Paleozoic pulses affecting prey. The First Pulse Dipnoi, Tetrapoda), Osteichthyes (Actinopterygii, (~430–390 Ma) brought fi shes to brackish and freshwater Sarcopterygii), and Gnathostomata (Chondrichthyes, environments where they diversifi ed, with one lineage giv- Osteichthyes). ing rise to tetrapods. The Second Pulse (~340–250 Ma) led to Cyclostomata wa s or ig i na l ly considered a ba sa l, mono- a Permo-Carboniferous explosion of tetrapods, adapting to phyletic group based on morphology (8), but later mor- diverse terrestrial niches.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishes Scales & Tails Scale Types 1
    Phylum Chordata SUBPHYLUM VERTEBRATA Metameric chordates Linear series of cartilaginous or boney support (vertebrae) surrounding or replacing the notochord Expanded anterior portion of nervous system THE FISHES SCALES & TAILS SCALE TYPES 1. COSMOID (most primitive) First found on ostracaderm agnathans, thick & boney - composed of: Ganoine (enamel outer layer) Cosmine (thick under layer) Spongy bone Lamellar bone Perhaps selected for protection against eurypterids, but decreased flexibility 2. GANOID (primitive, still found on some living fish like gar) 3. PLACOID (old scale type found on the chondrichthyes) Dentine, tooth-like 4. CYCLOID (more recent scale type, found in modern osteichthyes) 5. CTENOID (most modern scale type, found in modern osteichthyes) TAILS HETEROCERCAL (primitive, still found on chondrichthyes) ABBREVIATED HETEROCERCAL (found on some primitive living fish like gar) DIPHYCERCAL (primitive, found on sarcopterygii) HOMOCERCAL (most modern, found on most modern osteichthyes) Agnatha (class) [connect the taxa] Cyclostomata (order) Placodermi Acanthodii (class) (class) Chondrichthyes (class) Osteichthyes (class) Actinopterygii (subclass) Sarcopterygii (subclass) Dipnoi (order) Crossopterygii (order) Ripidistia (suborder) Coelacanthiformes (suborder) Chondrostei (infra class) Holostei (infra class) Teleostei (infra class) CLASS AGNATHA ("without jaws") Most primitive - first fossils in Ordovician Bottom feeders, dorsal/ventral flattened Cosmoid scales (Ostracoderms) Pair of eyes + pineal eye - present in a few living fish and reptiles - regulates circadian rhythms Nine - seven gill pouches No paired appendages, medial nosril ORDER CYCLOSTOMATA (60 spp) Last living representatives - lampreys & hagfish Notochord not replaced by vertebrae Cartilaginous cranium, scaleless body Sea lamprey predaceous - horny teeth in buccal cavity & on tongue - secretes anti-coaggulant Lateral Line System No stomach or spleen 5 - 7 year life span - adults move into freshwater streams, spawn, & die.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserved Keratin Gene Clusters in Ancient Fish: an Evolutionary Seed for Terrestrial Adaptation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.063123; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Conserved Keratin Gene Clusters in Ancient Fish: an Evolutionary Seed for Terrestrial Adaptation Yuki Kimura1 and Masato Nikaido*,1 1 School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology * Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: Gene cluster; Keratin; Vertebrate evolution; Comparative genomics; Phylogenetics; Selection analysis; Synteny analysis Highlights Two major keratin clusters are conserved from sharks to terrestrial vertebrates. Adult epidermis-specific keratins in amphibians stem from the two major clusters. A novel keratin gene subcluster was found in reedfish. Ancestral krt18/krt8 gene sets were found in all vertebrates. Functional diversification signatures were found in reedfish and amphibian keratins. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.063123; this version posted October 5, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Abstract Type I and type II keratins are subgroups of intermediate filament proteins that provide toughness to the epidermis and protect it from water loss. In terrestrial vertebrates, the keratin genes form two major clusters, clusters 1 and 2, each of which is dominated by type I and II keratin genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Jawless Fishes of the World
    Jawless Fishes of the World Jawless Fishes of the World: Volume 1 Edited by Alexei Orlov and Richard Beamish Jawless Fishes of the World: Volume 1 Edited by Alexei Orlov and Richard Beamish This book first published 2016 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2016 by Alexei Orlov, Richard Beamish and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-8582-7 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-8582-9 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Preface ........................................................................................................ ix M. Docker Part 1: Evolution, Phylogeny, Diversity, and Taxonomy Chapter One ................................................................................................. 2 Molecular Evolution in the Lamprey Genomes and Its Relevance to the Timing of Whole Genome Duplications T. Manousaki, H. Qiu, M. Noro, F. Hildebrand, A. Meyer and S. Kuraku Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 17 Molecular Phylogeny and Speciation of East Asian Lampreys (genus Lethenteron) with reference to their Life-History Diversification Y. Yamazaki and
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Crossroads in Developmental Biology: Cyclostomes (Lamprey and Hagfish) Sebastian M
    PRIMER SERIES PRIMER 2091 Development 139, 2091-2099 (2012) doi:10.1242/dev.074716 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish) Sebastian M. Shimeld1,* and Phillip C. J. Donoghue2 Summary and is appealing because it implies a gradual assembly of vertebrate Lampreys and hagfish, which together are known as the characters, and supports the hagfish and lampreys as experimental cyclostomes or ‘agnathans’, are the only surviving lineages of models for distinct craniate and vertebrate evolutionary grades (i.e. jawless fish. They diverged early in vertebrate evolution, perceived ‘stages’ in evolution). However, only comparative before the origin of the hinged jaws that are characteristic of morphology provides support for this phylogenetic hypothesis. The gnathostome (jawed) vertebrates and before the evolution of competing hypothesis, which unites lampreys and hagfish as sister paired appendages. However, they do share numerous taxa in the clade Cyclostomata, thus equally related to characteristics with jawed vertebrates. Studies of cyclostome gnathostomes, has enjoyed unequivocal support from phylogenetic development can thus help us to understand when, and how, analyses of protein-coding sequence data (e.g. Delarbre et al., 2002; key aspects of the vertebrate body evolved. Here, we Furlong and Holland, 2002; Kuraku et al., 1999). Support for summarise the development of cyclostomes, highlighting the cyclostome theory is now overwhelming, with the recognition of key species studied and experimental methods available. We novel families of non-coding microRNAs that are shared then discuss how studies of cyclostomes have provided exclusively by hagfish and lampreys (Heimberg et al., 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • Fiftee N Vertebrate Beginnings the Chordates
    Hickman−Roberts−Larson: 15. Vertebrate Beginnings: Text © The McGraw−Hill Animal Diversity, Third The Chordates Companies, 2002 Edition 15 chapter •••••• fifteen Vertebrate Beginnings The Chordates It’s a Long Way from Amphioxus Along the more southern coasts of North America, half buried in sand on the seafloor,lives a small fishlike translucent animal quietly filtering organic particles from seawater.Inconspicuous, of no commercial value and largely unknown, this creature is nonetheless one of the famous animals of classical zoology.It is amphioxus, an animal that wonderfully exhibits the four distinctive hallmarks of the phylum Chordata—(1) dorsal, tubular nerve cord overlying (2) a supportive notochord, (3) pharyngeal slits for filter feeding, and (4) a postanal tail for propulsion—all wrapped up in one creature with textbook simplicity. Amphioxus is an animal that might have been designed by a zoologist for the classroom. During the nineteenth century,with inter- est in vertebrate ancestry running high, amphioxus was considered by many to resemble closely the direct ancestor of the vertebrates. Its exalted position was later acknowledged by Philip Pope in a poem sung to the tune of “Tipperary.”It ends with the refrain: It’s a long way from amphioxus It’s a long way to us, It’s a long way from amphioxus To the meanest human cuss. Well,it’s good-bye to fins and gill slits And it’s welcome lungs and hair, It’s a long, long way from amphioxus But we all came from there. But amphioxus’place in the sun was not to endure.For one thing,amphioxus lacks one of the most important of vertebrate charac- teristics,a distinct head with special sense organs and the equipment for shifting to an active predatory mode of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserved Keratin Gene Clusters in Ancient Fish: an Evolutionary Seed for Terrestrial Adaptation
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.063123; this version posted May 7, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Conserved Keratin Gene Clusters in Ancient Fish: an Evolutionary Seed for Terrestrial Adaptation Yuki Kimura1 and Masato Nikaido*,1 1 School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology * Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Keywords: evolution, gene cluster, comparative genomics, keratin Highlights Two major keratin clusters are conserved from Chondrichthyes to terrestrial vertebrates. Adult epidermis-specific keratins in amphibians stem from the two major clusters. A novel keratin gene subcluster was found in reedfish. Ancestral krt18/krt8 gene sets were found in all vertebrates. Functional diversification signatures were found in reedfish and amphibian keratins. 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.06.063123; this version posted May 7, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Abstract Type I and type II keratins are subgroups of intermediate filament proteins that provide toughness to the epidermis and protect it from water loss. In terrestrial vertebrates, the keratin genes form two major clusters, clusters 1 and 2, each of which is dominated by type I and II keratin genes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Immune System: Conservation and Diversification
    Title The Evolution of the Immune System Conservation and Diversification Page left intentionally blank The Evolution of the Immune System Conservation and Diversification Davide Malagoli Department of Life Sciences Biology Building, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, United States 50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek per- mission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions. This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as may be noted herein). Notices Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary. Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Maintenance of Hox Gen in Vertebrates and the Teleost-Specific Genome Duplication
    The evolution and maintenance of Hox gen in vertebrates and the teleost-specific genome duplication SHIGEHIRO KURAKU and AXEL MEYER* Lehrstuhl fur Zoologie und Evolutionsbiotogie, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany ABSTRACT Hox genes are known to specify spatial identities along the anterior-posterior axis during embryogenesis. In vertebrates and most other deuterostomes, they are arranged in sets of uninterrupted clusters on chromosomes, and are in most cases expressed in a "colinear" fashion, in which genes closer to the 3'-end of the Hox clusters are expressed earlier and more anteriorly and genes close to the 5'-end of the clusters later and more posteriorly. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of how Hoxgene clusters have been modified from basal lineages of deuterostomes to diverse taxa of vertebrates. Our parsimony reconstruction of Hox cluster architecture at various stages of vertebrate evolution highlights that the variation in Hox cluster structures among jawed vertebrates is mostly due to secondary lineage-specific gene losses and an additional genome duplication that occurred in the actinopterygian stem lineage, the teleost-specific genome duplication (TSGO). KEY WORDS: co/ineanty, two-round geno7lU! duplication, secondary gene loss Introduction there is a link between this special genomic architecture and the origin of morphological novelties, such as modifications of axial Hox genes are transcription factors that serve crucial roles segmental elements seen in the carapace of turtles (Ohya et aI., during development in particular in embryonic anterior-posterior 2005), loss of limbs in snakes (Cohn and Tickle, 1999), and the (A-P) patterning. In vertebrates and most other deuterostomes, acquisition of jaws in gnathostomes (Cohn, 2002; Takio et aI., Hox genes are arranged in sets of uninterrupted clusters on 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Agnatha (Cyclostomata) – No Jaws • Skull (Cranium) • Chondrichthyes – Single Cartilaginous • Neurocranium V
    Lecture 3 Ichthyology – Chpt 3 Helfman et al. Lecture 3 Ichthyology – Chpt 3 Helfman et al. Skeleton, Skin and Scales Skeleton, Skin and Scales • Skeleton, Skin and Scales • Skeleton, Skin and Scales • Skulls (3 major types) • Dermal v Cartilage replacement bones • Agnatha (Cyclostomata) – no jaws • Skull (Cranium) • Chondrichthyes – single cartilaginous • Neurocranium v. Chondrocranium structure • Dermatocranium • Bony fish • Branchiocranium • Gill arch supports Skeleton, Skin and Scales Branchiocranium Neurocranium Mandibular Arch (Upper jaw) – all dermal bone • Ethmoid region • Chondrichthyes = All palatoquadrate cartilage • Lateral ethmoids (LE) • Bony Fish - Premaxillae, Maxillae & •Ethmoids Supramaxilla • Vomer (PV) •Nasals (N) Lower jaw • Orbital Region • Pterosphenoids (PTS) – Chondricthyes = all Meckel’s cartilage • Basisphenoids (BS) – Bony - Dentary and Angular • Frontals (dermal) (F) • Infraorbitals (dermal) Types of Teeth (on jaws and pharyngeal jaws); • Lachrymal •OticRegion • Canine - large conical; Villiform - small, fine; • Sphenotics (SPH) Molariform - crushing, pavement type; • Pterotics (PTO) Cardiform - fine, pointed; Incisor - large w/ •Proortics(PRO) flattened cutting; Fused (beaks) – parrotfish; • Epiotics (EO) Triangular cutting – sharks; Pharyngeal – • Posttemporal cyprinids and cichlids etc • Parietals (dermal) (PA) • Basicranial Region • Palatine Arch - often part of suspensorium • Exoccipitals (EOC) (Next slide) • Basioccipitals (BOC) • Supraoccipitals (SOC) • Parasphenoid (dermal) (PS) 1 Branchiocranium (5
    [Show full text]
  • B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA
    B.Sc. II YEAR CHORDATA CHORDATA 16SCCZO3 Dr. R. JENNI & Dr. R. DHANAPAL DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY M. R. GOVT. ARTS COLLEGE MANNARGUDI CONTENTS CHORDATA COURSE CODE: 16SCCZO3 Block and Unit title Block I (Primitive chordates) 1 Origin of chordates: Introduction and charterers of chordates. Classification of chordates up to order level. 2 Hemichordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Balanoglossus and its affinities. 3 Urochordata: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Herdmania and its affinities. 4 Cephalochordates: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Branchiostoma (Amphioxus) and its affinities. 5 Cyclostomata (Agnatha) General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Petromyzon and its affinities. Block II (Lower chordates) 6 Fishes: General characters and classification up to order level. Types of scales and fins of fishes, Scoliodon as type study, migration and parental care in fishes. 7 Amphibians: General characters and classification up to order level, Rana tigrina as type study, parental care, neoteny and paedogenesis. 8 Reptilia: General characters and classification up to order level, extinct reptiles. Uromastix as type study. Identification of poisonous and non-poisonous snakes and biting mechanism of snakes. 9 Aves: General characters and classification up to order level. Study of Columba (Pigeon) and Characters of Archaeopteryx. Flight adaptations & bird migration. 10 Mammalia: General characters and classification up to order level, affinities of Prototheria, Metatheria and Eutheria. Study of rabbit (Oryctolagus) and dentition in mammals. Economic importance of mammals. CHORDATA 16SCCZO3 01 UNIT: 5 CYCLOSTOMATA (AGNATHA) CONTENTS - Objective - Introduction - General characters Cyclostomata - Classification - General study of Petromyzon - Summary - Glossary - Self Assessment Questions - Terminal Questions – References CHORDATA 16SCCZO3 01 5.1 OBJECTIVE D To understand the systematic and functional morphology of various groups of Cyclostomata.
    [Show full text]
  • Hagfish (Cyclostomata, Vertebrata): Searching for the Ancestral Developmental Plan of Vertebrates Shigeru Kuratani* and Kinya G
    My favorite animal Hagfish (Cyclostomata, Vertebrata): searching for the ancestral developmental plan of vertebrates Shigeru Kuratani* and Kinya G. Ota Summary of chordates, and this type of study is now being extended into The phylogenetic position of the hagfish remains genomics.(1–4) When the recent history of evolutionary enigmatic. In contrast to molecular data that suggest monophyly of the cyclostomes, several morphological developmental (‘‘evo-devo’’) studies is viewed, it is evident features imply a more ancestral state of this animal that information on agnathans (jawless vertebrates) is rather compared with the lampreys. To resolve this question poor, even though these animals may show an intermediate requires an understanding of the embryology of the state of developmental program linking non-vertebrate chor- hagfish, especially of the neural crest. The early develop- dates and well-known vertebrate model animals (Fig. 1). ment of the hagfish has long remained a mystery. We collected a shallow-water-dwelling hagfish, Eptatretus Among the living vertebrates, only two groups, the hagfishes burgeri, set up an aquarium tank designed to resemble its (Fig. 2) and lampreys (Fig. 3), are termed agnathans: they do habitat, and successfully obtained several embryos. not possess dorsoventrally divided movable jaws derived from By observing the histology and expression of genes the mandibular arch but instead have developed an ante- known to play fundamental roles in the neural crest, roposteriorly moving tongue apparatus in the oral region.(5,6) we found that the hagfish crest develops as delaminat- They also lack the neck region defined by the position of paired ing migratory cells, as in other vertebrates.
    [Show full text]