DOCSLIB.ORG

05/01429/Out Mixed Use Development Comprising Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
05/01429/Out Mixed Use Development Comprising Of 05/01429/OUT MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT COMPRISING OF RESIDENTIAL (APPROXIMATELY 500 DWELLINGS), A MIXED USE LOCAL CENTRE (USE CLASSES A1-A5, CLASS B1 AND D1), COUNTRY/LINEAR PARK EXTENSION, STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPING, OPEN SPACE AND PLAY AREA AND ASSOCIATED HIGHWAYS AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS (OUTLINE) AT Stantonbury Park - Land North of, Wolverton Road, Stantonbury FOR Genesis Holdings Ltd INTRODUCTION The application site of 'Stantonbury Park' lies on the northern edge of Milton Keynes and totals approximately 71 hectares. The site currently comprises open grassed farmland, divided through the middle in an east west direction by the canal. The area north of the canal stretches to as far as a track, which flanks a series of lakes, the remains of St Peter Church and a scheduled ancient monument. The area to the south of the canal is triangular in shape and is bound to the south and south east by the Wolverton Road and to the west by a woodland belt. The civic amenity site lies to the southwest corner. The site is currently in agricultural use predominantly for pasture with a small area of arable cultivation. The farm buildings, which lie to the southeast of the site on the Wolverton Road with the exception of the main house and a large grain store, have been converted to office use. The site is located within the parish of Haversham although it lies on the edge of the urban areas of Stantonbury, Great Linford and New Bradwell. The cemetery lies on the opposite side of Wolverton Road to the site. CURRENT APPLICATION The application which is in outline is accompanied by a Development Brief, an Environmental Impact Assessment and a Transport Assessment which indicate the proposal to include: * Residential development capable of accommodating at least 500 dwellings of which 30% are affordable housing, predominantly 2 storey with 3/3.5 storey buildings in key locations to act as landmarks and provide definition (approx. 15 hectares) * A local centre, comprising a mix of employment, retail, residential and community and leisure uses (approx 1 hectare) * Associated highways and highway junctions, foul drainage, surface water drainage, balancing areas, and integrated public transport routes (approx 2 hectares) * Extension to Linford Lakes Linear park in order to create a Country Park and new play areas for a range of ages (approx. 50 hectares) * Associated structure landscaping and earthworks (approx 3 hectares) The new local centre is proposed to be situated towards the southwestern corner of the site along the main transport corridor through the development and adjacent to Wolverton Road Housing areas are proposed with the intention that the density of the housing would vary from typical low/medium density of housing on the northern fringes of the site through to medium and higher density areas located towards the centre of the site, adjacent to the principal corridor of movement. The proposal indicates a new access road through the site linking from the existing Saxon Street/Wolverton Road junction through to a new access to the east of the site linking back onto Wolverton Road. This road will become a new transport corridor. The whole of the area of new build development is set within a strong landscape framework of public open space and strategic landscape infrastructure. A landscape 'linear parkway' corridor is also located through the north-south central axis of the residential development area, providing a connection from the linear park to Wolverton Road. A significant feature of the proposed development is a major area of open amenity space, comprising the whole undeveloped northern part of the site, to provide an extension to the Linford Lakes Linear Park and form a country park. It is intended that this area should be managed in such a way as to encourage ecological diversity whilst at the same time providing informal recreation opportunities. A balancing pond is proposed with a sustainable drainage system used to ensure that there is no adverse flooding effects within the development or downstream along the River Great Ouse. PLANNING HISTORY The site was not allocated in the Second Deposit Draft Local Plan but was put forward by the applicants as an omission site. The site was considered at the Local Plan Inquiry held between October 2003 and June 2004. The inspectors report following the Inquiry recommended that the Local Plan should include a Modification to allocate an Expansion Area at Stantonbury Park for a residential development of 500 houses, a country park, and a local centre. The site was subsequently allocated for this form of development within the proposed modifications to the Second Deposit Local Plan published in June 2005 under a new policy EA7. Cabinet and Council considered responses to the Local Plan Modifications in October and November 2005; no further changes to Policy EA7 were proposed. The Council has now adopted the Local Plan. The submitted outline application incorporates all those requirements/criteria set out in policy EA7. The Council's Local Development Scheme, approved by Cabinet in March 2005 and by the Government Office for the South East (GOSE) in April included the production of a Supplementary Planning Document for the Stantonbury Park site. In the knowledge of the new planning system and the requirement to have an adopted masterplan for the site prior to the determination of any planning application, a number of consultation events took place prior to the submission of the planning application to give an opportunity to people to raise issues on the development of the site. Representatives of the developer and their planning consultants attended the events. This informal and 'frontloaded' consultation programme is in addition to the statutory consultation procedures on the Development Brief itself. The Council and the developer have taken a collaborative approach to public consultation in respect of this site, which is consistent with the requirements of the new planning system to involve stakeholders earlier in the process. The Council does not yet have an adopted Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) but the approach taken through the focus groups and exhibitions was considered appropriate under the new system. MAIN ISSUES The main issues are: - 1) Compliance with policy, government guidance and acceptability 2) Development Brief Design and layout 2) Planning Obligations- whether the proposed levels of contributions are fair and reasonably related to the nature and scale of the development. CONSULTATIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS Buckinghamshire and River Ouzel Internal Drainage Board have no comments. Minerals and Waste Team have no objection. Waste collection needs to be considered especially from flat blocks. Beds, Bucks & Oxon Wildlife Trust have no objections subject to the mitigation in the EIA being adhered to and management being put in place. It is also essential that appropriate long term funding of the site is formulated with the developer and secured through S106. Rights to ride representative - The masterplan is too small; plans fail to show cycle routes through the development; the plans omit the proposed bridleway running from Newport Pagnell end linkage, crossing the existing canal up to the old church; there needs to be a linkage from Newport Pagnell to existing redways; linkages have been removed from the previous scheme; dangerous at grade crossing to the New Bradwell end linkage Arts Officer advises that an artist works with the developer from an early stage to identify integrated projects that involve and engage new communities. 1% of capital costs to this work in accordance with policy. Urban Design recommend that the brief be altered especially in relation to the 'built form' plan, which should be amended, to illustrate that there are a number of problems with it. These have now been dealt with the adopted Development Brief. British Waterways are broadly happy with the details of the development brief but their main concern is that is that the design of the open space edge of the housing area should be high quality. The proposed accesses for vehicles and pedestrians through the area and into the parkland are also important considerations. The dwellings on the edge should face out over the linear park with a wide public path to define the edge and limited planting to allow visibility. Structures across the canal and towing paths will have to be upgraded to allow for increased usage. Permission with BW needs to be discussed in relation to works to the canal, any displacement of moorings, safety and security and discharge into the canal. Environment Agency broadly agrees with the principles of surface water proposals and the Flood Risk Assessment but requires further details including a model of the watercourse and volumes and flow controls for the required attenuation. They have confirmed that surface water drainage issues can be dealt with through S106 and conditions. Rights of Way Officer has no objections subject to the right of way remaining open and its character maintained. Environmental Health - Contaminated Land have no objections subject to conditions; Air Quality have no objections and Noise considers that a further noise study be carried out on the impact of increased road traffic noise at a detailed stage. English Heritage has no objections to the application or the development brief. The local badger consultant, Mr Frewin found no badger setts or signs English Nature is satisfied that this development is unlikely to impact on any statutory designated sites. Within the Brief they are happy to see that sustainable construction techniques will be incorporated into the development such as SUDS and use of Eco-homes. The Parks Trust represented by David Lock Associates indicates that the Trust's concerns relate to the potential impact of the development on Stantonbury Local Centre, which it owns and manages. The proposed Local Centre is situated in a prominent position and is likely to attract passing trade as well as local customers and as such they state that it could be argued that the proposed centre could have an adverse impact on the vitality and viability of Stantonbury Local Centre.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canal, Marina and Waterway
    NEWSLETTER - ISSUE 1 HIGHLIGHTS IN THIS ISSUE • Check out the masterplan WELCOME • Marvel at the new marina TO CAMPBELL WHARF • Discover the site’s history Welcome to the first Campbell Wharf Newsletter, bringing you all the latest news on Crest Nicholson’s exciting canalside development in Milton Keynes. Overlooking the Grand Union Canal, Campbell Wharf will include 383 new homes, a 111 berth marina, a canal-side pub, café, restaurant and a landmark new footbridge linking the two sides of the Canal. This fantastic range of amenities will bring many social and CAMPBELL WHARF FACT FILE community benefits to the local area. The development will provide a new destination on the Grand Union Canal and deliver additional access routes • 383 new homes for pedestrians and cyclists, as well as encouraging the • 111 berth marina use of existing routes around the local area. • 9,200 sq ft commercial space • Landmark footbridge • 30% affordable housing 1 DISCOVER CAMPBELL WHARF LOCATION & SURROUNDING ARCHAEOLOGY & SITE VILLAGES HISTORY Campbell Wharf sits between Newlands and Archaeological investigations were undertaken on the Campbell Park in Central Milton Keynes, with the site before any building work could begin. The team Grand Union Canal passing through the middle of uncovered ancient artefacts and remains that suggest the site. the land was used historically for farming, along with some late Iron Age and early Roman pottery - though The development stretches across the Wards of sadly not enough to suggest a domestic settlement. Campbell Park, Old Woughton and Central Milton Larger quantities of pottery artefacts were found Keynes, and is also split across the Parishes of both within an area used for crop processing, where the Campbell Park and Central Milton Keynes.
    [Show full text]
  • Hanslope, Milton Keynes, MK19 7HL Mawley Hanslope Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK19 7HL
    Hanslope, Milton Keynes, MK19 7HL Mawley Hanslope Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK19 7HL £1,250,000 Mawley is an attractive 6 bedroom detached period property sitting in over 3 acres off a public bridleway with an opportunity to further extend into stunning contemporary living accommodation, and conversion of separate barn into annex and stables, subject to pending planning permission. The property is surrounded by countryside & farmland, - ideal for those looking for a manageable equestrian property. The house, formally two properties converted into one large home, has been extensively yet sympathetically modernised in recent times but still offers scope for further improvements to the rear wing and potential for a combination of conversions and extension to both the house and barn - see our later note. Mawley has well presented accommodation, abundant with character features to include fireplaces exposed beams, stone & brickwork and slate floors. It comprises four reception rooms, two kitchens, six bedrooms and three bath/shower rooms. Plans have been drawn to transform the rear wing, converting the attached barn and adding a heavily glazed extension along with conversion of the separate barn in to an annexe. The property occupies a plot of around 3 acres to include paddocks of around 2.5 acres with its rural setting and adjacent network of bridleways, paths and narrow lanes makes for a prefect home for those wishing to keep horses at home. This is a fabulous property in a stunning setting which must be seen to be appreciated. • EQUESTRIAN PROPERTY • RURAL LOCATION • AROUND 3 ARCES • DETACHED FARM HOUSE • ABUNDANT CHARACTER FEATURES • 4 RECEPTION ROOMS • 6 BEDROOMS • 3 BATH/ SHOWER ROOMS • BARN & YARD • SCOPE TO EXTEND & CONVERT Ground Floor established flower and shrub beds and mature trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Linford M1
    Conservation and Archaeology Conservation Area Review Programme Great Linford Conservation Area Review Consultation Draft The Manor House, Great Linford www.milton-keynes.gov.uk/planning-and-building/conservation-and-archaeology This document is to be read in conjunction with the General Information Document available on line Conservation Area Review Programme - Great Linford Conservation Area Review - Consultation Draft Conservation Area Review Programme - Great Linford Conservation Area Review - Consultation Draft Historical Background Since the 1970’s there have been further significant changes relating to new town developments in the Archaeological investigation suggests that there has form of a series of individual housing developments of been a settlement in the area of the church since late varying quality that have infilled open land around the Saxon times. The early settlement lay on a lost section newly built St Leger Drive to the west and Marsh Road of the existing High Street which seems to have to the east. The effect has been to conceal most of the extended down the hill, to where the Manor Ponds former village within the newer developments so that now are, before turning westwards to the church and it has to be sought out rather than arrived at just by then northwards in the direction of the river Great Ouse following a principal route through the grid square. where it would once have met with the east-west aligned road connecting Wolverton, Stony Stratford and Newport Pagnell1. The church and some houses stood on higher ground above the river but, perhaps in response to the marshy nature of the lower ground, the road was diverted eastward from where the Nag’s Head now stands, along the brow of the hill, before heading north once more, leaving the church and early settlement isolated.
    [Show full text]
  • Research & Intelligence
    Legend Borough Boundary Parish Wards PARISH PARISH WARD Parish boundary Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP CENTRAL BLETCHLEY Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP MANOR NORTH Parish Wards Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP EATON SOUTH Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP FENNY STRATFORD Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP NEWTON LEYS Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP MANOR SOUTH Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP EATON NORTH Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP QUEENSWAY AND DENBIGH WEST Bletchley and Fenny Stratford CP GRANBY Bradwell CP BRADWELL Bradwell CP BRADWELL COMMON Bradwell CP HEELANDS Campbell Park CP WOOLSTONE Campbell Park CP SPRINGFIELD Campbell Park CP WILLEN AND NEWLANDS Campbell Park CP OLDBROOK Campbell Park CP FISHERMEAD Great Linford CP NEATH HILL Great Linford CP REDHOUSE PARK Great Linford CP GREAT LINFORD Great Linford CP WILLEN PARK Great Linford CP DOWNS BARN Great Linford CP CONNIBURROW Great Linford CP DOWNHEAD PARK Great Linford CP GIFFARD PARK AND BLAKELANDS Great Linford CP BOLBECK PARK AND PENNYLAND Newport Pagnell CP NEWPORT PAGNELL NORTH Newport Pagnell CP NEWPORT PAGNELL SOUTH Shenley Brook End CP FURZTON SOUTH Shenley Brook End CP EMERSON VALLEY SOUTH Shenley Brook End CP SHENLEY LODGE Shenley Brook End CP SHENLEY BROOK END Shenley Brook End CP TATTENHOE Shenley Brook End CP FURZTON NORTH Shenley Brook End CP EMERSON VALLEY NORTH Shenley Brook End CP KINGSMEAD Shenley Brook End CP WESTCROFT Shenley Church End CP CROWNHILL Shenley Church End CP GRANGE FARM AND HAZELEY Shenley Church End CP SHENLEY CHURCH END Shenley Church
    [Show full text]
  • 17/00838/OUT Description Outline Application for the Development Of
    ITEM 7(a) Application Number: 17/00838/OUT Description Outline application for the development of 200 dwelling houses, with all matters reserved AT Land to the East of, Eastfield Drive, Hanslope, FOR SiteplanUK LLP Target: 30th June 2018 Extension of Time: No Ward: Newport Pagnell North And Hanslope Parish: Hanslope Parish Council Report Author/Case Officer: Paul Keen Deputy Development Management Manager Contact Details: [email protected], 01908253239 Team Manager: Tracy Darke - 01908 252394, [email protected] 1.0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that planning permission is refused for the reasons set out in section 7.0 of this report. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The site 2.1.1 The application site is located adjacent to the eastern settlement boundary of Hanslope and 11km from central Milton Keynes. The site itself is generally flat, low- lying, grassland used for pastoral grazing, denoted by well-maintained mature hedgerow, with trees along its southern, western and eastern boundaries. It is currently within agricultural use (Grade 3 classification). 2.1.2 The site lies outside the development boundary of Hanslope and therefore within the open countryside. The site is however immediately adjacent to existing residential properties along Eastfield Drive and Newport Road. 2.1.3 Hanslope is defined as a ‘Selected Village’ within the Milton Keynes Core Strategy 2013. 2.1.4 There are a number of routes within the locality, the main routes being Newport Road adjacent to the south-east and Gold Street/Park Road/Long Street Road to the west at approximately 200 metres.
    [Show full text]
  • CAMPBELL PARK, MILTON KEYNES AMENDED August 2018
    Understanding Historic Parks and Gardens in Buckinghamshire The Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust Research & Recording Project CAMPBELL PARK, MILTON KEYNES AMENDED August 2018 The Stanley Smith (UK) Horticultural Trust Bucks Gardens Trust HISTORIC SITE BOUNDARY NB the south-west corner of Campbell Park (the environs of Marlborough Street) overlaps with part of the north-east corner of Central Milton Keynes (qv). Bucks Gardens Trust, Site Dossier: Campbell Park, Milton Keynes, MKC A 2018 NB the south-west corner of Campbell Park (the environs of Marlborough Street) overlaps with part of the north-east corner of Central Milton Keynes (qv). 2 INTRODUCTION Background to the Project This site dossier has been prepared as part of The Buckinghamshire Gardens Trust (BGT) Research and Recording Project, begun in 2014. This site is one of several hundred designed landscapes county-wide identified by Bucks County Council (BCC) in 1998 (including Milton Keynes District) as potentially retaining evidence of historic interest, as part of the Historic Parks and Gardens Register Review project carried out for English Heritage (now Historic England) (BCC Report No. 508). The list is not definitive and further parks and gardens may be identified as research continues or further information comes to light. Content BGT has taken the Register Review list as a sound basis from which to select sites for appraisal as part of its Research and Recording Project for designed landscapes in the historic county of Bucks (pre-1974 boundaries). For each site a dossier is prepared by volunteers trained on behalf of BGT by experts in appraising designed landscapes who have worked extensively for English Heritage/Historic England on its Register Upgrade Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Milton Keynes Council Event/Activity Summary Report 05/03/2018 Number of Records: 33
    Milton Keynes Council Event/Activity Summary Report 05/03/2018 Number of records: 33 Event Ref, Type Name Dates Organisation (EMK1293) Hyde Solar Farm, Olney - Watching Brief 03/01/2017 - 27/01/2017, occasionally Cotswold Archaeology Event - Survey An archaeological watching brief was undertaken by Cotswold Archaeology during groundworks associated with construction of a solar farm; to include the installation of solar panels, underground cabling, inverter/transformer stations, DNO, client substation, spare parts container, landscaping and other associated works at Hyde Farm, Olney, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire. No features or deposits of archaeological significance were observed during groundworks, and no artefactual material pre-dating the modern period was recovered. (EMK1294) Land at Walkers Bridge, Olney - Watching Brief 01/02/2017 Archaeological Solutions Ltd / Hertfordshire Archaeological Trust Event - Intervention Monitoring of the excavations for the footings of the new agricultural building in the northeastern corner of Walkers Bridge Field revealed a Roman ditch (F1009), orientated northwest/southeast and a Roman pit (F1004). The latter cut undated Pit F1007. The fill (L1008) of Pit F1007 consisted of a compact pale grey, with red, orange and yellow mottling, crushed limestone. This suggests the possibility that the feature may have been a footing or pad for a large post. Pit F1004 may represent the deliberate removal of the post. (EMK1295) Outbuilding, New Inn, Bradwell Road, New 31/01/2017 Bancroft Heritage Services Bradwell
    [Show full text]
  • What Do YOU Think?
    Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Consultation December 2020 What do YOU think? Contents Letter from the Steering Group Page 1 What You Told Us Page 3 Policy Intents Page 7 Design and Energy Efficiency Page 8 Non-designated Heritage Assets Page 9 Important Views Page 10 Designated Local Green Spaces Page 13 Green and Blue Infrastructure Network Page 14 Footpaths and Bridleways Page 16 Cycleways Page 18 Community Facilities Page 19 Traffic Page 20 Economy, Employment and Agriculture Page 20 Site Assessment Page 21 Questionnaire – insert Photo credit: Thank you to Laura Boddington who supplied most of the photographs. Haversham-cum-Little Linford Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group The Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group and Haversham-cum-Little-Linford Parish Council have been working for a considerable time to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan for the Parish. We have been assisted in this by Oneill Homer, a leading consultancy who have assisted Parish and Town Councils around the country to produce well over 100 Neighbourhood Plans, including several in Milton Keynes. The cost of this consultancy work has been paid for by a government grant. What is a Neighbourhood Plan? A document that sets out planning policies for the neighbourhood area – planning policies are used to decide whether to approve planning applications. Written by the local community, the people who know and love the area, rather than the Local Planning Authority. A powerful tool to ensure the community gets the right types of development, in the right place. What is this document for? We had hoped to hold a public meeting / exhibition to discuss the significant work undertaken so far and find out YOUR views of our policy intents and the potential development sites offered by landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Decisions Made by Individual Cabinet Members/Officers
    Published: 8 July 2016 DELEGATED DECISION DATE: 5 JULY 2016 Present: Councillor Middleton (Cabinet member for Resources and Innovation), Councillor Nolan (Cabinet Member for Children and Families), M Bracey (Corporate Director – People), T Hannam (Corporate Director – Resources), N Jones (Service Director [Finance and Resources]), S Bridglalsingh (Acting Service Director [Legal and Democratic Services]), M Devlin-Hogg (Head of Human Resources), K Rashid (Interim Capital Programme Director), M Darbyshire (Strategic Lead - Access), S Sims (Strategic Lead – Children Missing Education) and S Heap (Committee Services and Scrutiny Manager) Also Present: Councillors Ganatra, A Geary and d Hopkins and 14 members of the public. Subject Decision Decision Maker Documents Taken Into Account Essential 1. That the Cool Air System in Civic Offices be replaced, in accordance with Councillor Report Maintenance of Air Statutory Health and Safety Duties, inter alia, Regulation 6 of the (Health, Middleton Cooling System in Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, SI 1992/3004, which requires that (Cabinet member Civic Offices effective and suitable provision be made to ensure that every enclosed for Resources and workplace is ventilated by a sufficient quantity of fresh or purified air. Innovation) 2. That a resource allocation and spend approval of £2.236m be added to the Capital Programme 2016/17 and £0.400m added into the Capital Programme 2017/18 to reflect the timing of the works. 3. That this decision be not implemented until after the meeting of the Scrutiny
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Bus Routes
    A B C D E F G H J K X60 to Aylesbury X5 to Buckingham and Oxford 33 33A to Northampton M 37 to Olney 1 N and Buckingham M o rt o h Q t a ueen o m E r p l w ea HAVERSHAM t no d o r oa a n R ©P1ndar S ©P1ndar y tr ee on R t rt o ve a ol d X60 W 1 A ©P1ndar 1 5 d ©P1ndar oa Stony Stratford R am sh 6 X60 er av H 33A 37 33 ©P1ndar POETS ©P1ndar Stratford Roa d ©P1ndar Wolverton Road ©P1ndar OLD ESTATE LATHBURY ©P1ndar Slated Row ©P1ndar WOLVERTON H ©P1ndar 6 School ©P1ndar i g 2 ©P1ndar h W S Wolverton o t X60 r r ©P1ndar e Rail Station d ©P1ndar e s w to Olney and t Str Urban Bus Routes 21 at 6 WOLVERTON ford 5 7 33 33A o Lavendon ©P1ndar 4 4 R r L oa t MILL 6 d h o 310 ©P1ndar 37 to Astwood ©P1ndar NEWPORT n A d d a o ©P1ndar v o n en The ©P1ndar ue PAGNELL R R ©P1ndar n d Radcliffe April 2021 Westb o Wolverton ©P1ndar u r t y School ©P1ndar p ©P1ndar L m ad t a a o e n R ©P1ndar h n ©P1ndar t e ©P1ndar e o ©P1ndar X5 r r gt t o in S er WOLVERTON N h X6 r ©P1ndar S o ©P1ndar 2 ©P1ndar 2 A s 2 d 2 5 37 n ©P1ndar 4 i ©P1ndar 37 21 W STONY Wolverton ©P1ndar ©P1ndar Church Street 5 Newport Pagnell STRATFORD 7 OAKRIDGE Market Hill 33 ©P1ndar ©P1ndar Ne PARK ©P1ndar ©P1ndar 4 5 6 7 wport ©P1ndar R REDHOUSE ©P1ndar S o ©P1ndar 1 2 21 37 C10 l A NEW ad a ©P1ndar r e PARK ©P1ndar R d d 33 33A 310 ©P1ndar n o v erto ad ©P1ndar lv e w i ©P1ndar o V 7 W ©P1ndar BRADWELL ©P1ndar r ad 6 ©P1ndar ©P1ndar Ro 4 L e Wolverton ©P1ndar a GREENLEYS l D 33A ©P1ndar l CALVERTON n l ©P1ndar L l 21 ©P1ndar e a 21 e ©P1ndar H ©P1ndar i n ©P1ndar gh Street X60 n 33
    [Show full text]
  • Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire
    Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire Archaeological Watching Brief for The Parks Trust CA Project: 660924 Site Code: GLM17 CA Report: 17554 HER Ref: EMK1317 October 2017 Great Linford Manor Park Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire Archaeological Watching Brief CA Project: 660924 Site Code: GLM17 HER Ref: EMK1317 CA Report: 17554 Document Control Grid Revision Date Author Checked by Status Reasons for Approved revision by A 6/9/17 SB and AKM JN Draft Internal review B 10/10/17 AKM PB Draft Internal review MLC This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology © Cotswold Archaeology Great Linford Manor Park, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire: Archaeological Watching Brief CONTENTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 2. ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 3. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................... 5 4. METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................... 6 5. RESULTS (FIG.
    [Show full text]