Incorporating Field Data Into Archival Research
Incorporating Field Data into Archival Research The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Soltes, Eugene F. "Incorporating Field Data into Archival Research." Journal of Accounting Research 52, no. 2 (May 2014): 521–540. Published Version https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12047 Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37366628 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP Incorporating Field Data into Archival Research Eugene Soltes Harvard Business School January 2014 Abstract: I explore the use of field data in conjunction with archival evidence by examining Iliev, Miller, and Roth’s [2014] analysis of an amendment to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This regulatory amendment allowed depositary banks to cross-list firms without the cooperation of foreign issuers. Iliev, Miller, and Roth [2014] argue that the regulation failed to fulfill its intended purpose and imposed significant costs on foreign firms for the benefit of depositary banks. Drawing on evidence from lawyers, issuers, depositary banks, and regulators involved in the design and implementation of the amendment, I describe a more optimistic assessment of the amendment and its effects on capital markets. I conclude by discussing opportunities for field data in financial reporting and disclosure research. Accepted by Christian Leuz. I would like to express my gratitude to Ian Gow, Paul Healy, Blythe McGarvie, Jennifer Nashel, and Suraj Srinivasan for their helpful feedback and Nanette Byrnes for excellent research assistance.
[Show full text]