Anadolu Tarım Bilim. Derg. , 2010,25(S -2):1 31 -136 Research Anadolu J. Agric. Sci., 2010,25(S-2):131-136 Aratırma

IMPACTOFSOILQUALITYOTHEDISTRIBUTIOOFTERRESTRIALISOPODSISOME TUISIAWETLADS H.KHEMAISSIA1, *C.SOUTYGROSSET 2K.ASRIAMMAR 1 1UnitédeRecherchedeBiologieAnimaleetSystématiqueEvolutive–FacultédesSciencesdeTunis– CampusUniversitaire,2092ElManarII–Tunisie 2LaboratoireÉcologie,Évolution,SymbioseUMRCRS6556UniversitédePoitiers–France *email:hajer_kh@yahoo Abstract: NostudiesinTunisiahavefocusingonananalysisofoniscideandiversityinwetlands.Toimproveourknowledge ontheoccupyingthistypeofhabitat,fieldworkwasconductedduringspring2008in18wetlands(3dams,4hill reservoirs,7lagoons,2sebkhasand2rivers)locatedinthenorthoftheTunisiandorsal.Isopodswerecollectedbyhand eachtimewithrespecttothesamesamplingeffort.Atthelaboratory,Isopodsareidentified,countedandsexed.Physico chemicalanalyseswereperformedfromsoilsampledineachsite.Theresultsrevealthepresenceof19terrestrialisopods speciesbelongingto10families. Chaetophiloscia cellaria and laevis arethemostabundantspecies;theirrelative abundanceisrespectivelyequalto29.5and23.4%.Thespeciesrichnessvariedfrom8inbothlagoonsofGharElMelehand Bizerteto1insomehillreservoirs. Chaetophiloscia cellaria, Leptotrichus panzeri, Porcellio variabilis and Porcellio laevis toleratechangesinsalinityupto35.4g/kg, whereasothers,suchas Armadillidium sulcatum and Armadillo officinalis , were collectedinstationswheresoilsalinitydoesnotexceed8.5g/kg.Amongenvironmentalfactors,thisstudyshowstheeffectof soil salinity on the distribution of terrestrial isopods. Other factors, such as relative humidity, conductivity and calcium contentofthesoil,willbediscussedinordertodefinethepreferendumofeachspecies. KeyWords :Distribution,Terrestrialisopod,Wetland,Soilsalinity,pHvalue 1.ITRODUCTIO 2.MATERIALADMETHODS Wetlands are of a great importance in 2.1.SamplingMethod conservationbiology.Inthisparticularenvironment, Field work wasdoneinspring2008whichisthe consideredamongthemostbiologicallydiverseand mainactivityseasonofisopodsinTunisia.Terrestrial productive , human activities (urban isopodswerecollectedbyhandeachtimewithrespect growth, driveways, pollution…) induce wetland to the same sampling effort. During collecting, the degradation and the loss of biodiversity. Recently, vegetation present, the humidity and the air different authors proposed new methods, based on temperature were also noted for further evaluations. soil microarthropods, in order to evaluate the At the laboratory, Isopods were identified with the environmental quality. Indeed, many factors helpoftheworksfromVandel(1960,1962),Medini (salinity, humidity, temperature) influence the Bouaziz, (2002) and Hamaied, (2008) then counted species diversity and the number of terrestrial andsexed.Physicochemicalanalyseswereperformed isopods. For example, Van Straalen and Verhoef fromsoilsampledineachsite. (1997)developedasoilpHindicatorsystembased 2.2.SamplingSites on soil pH preferences of collembolans, mites and Eighteen wetlands located in the north of the woodlice. Tunisia were studied: (3 dams, 4 hill reservoirs, 7 In Tunisia, several publications on terrestrial lagoons,2sebkhasand2rivers)(Table1). isopods have been available in the last decades. 2.3DataAnalysis These studies were performed on the systematic, Different indices estimating the diversity in the biogeographyandthereproductionofmanyspecies studiedbiotopeswereused: such as Porcellio variabilis (Medini et al. 2000), The abundance of individual species A Porcellio lamellatus (Khemaissia & NasriAmmar, corresponding to the total number of individuals 2008, 2010), Porcellionides pruinosus (Achouri & gatheredinaparticularbiotope. CharfiCheikhrouha, 2001, 2005, Achouri et al. DiversitywasmeasuredusingtheShannonWeiner 2003), Porcellionides sexfasciatus (Achouri & index H’ and the Pielou’s evenness index (J’) was CharfiCheikhrouha, 2001, 2002, 2005) , estimatedtoanalyzetheevennessofthecommunity reaumuri (Kacem & Rezig, 1995; H’=∑((Ni/N)*Log2(Ni/N)) (1) Nasri et al. 1996) , Armadillidium pelagicum J’=H’/log 2S (2) (Hamaied et al. 2004 ; Hamaied & Charfi WhereS=thetotalnumberofspeciesinthesample; Cheikhrouha,2004).However,theterrestrialisopod Ni = individual number of species (i); N = total communitiesinhabitingtheTunisian wetlands have individualnumberofpopulating. not received any attention. The main aim of this study is to improve our knowledge on the species 3.RESULTSADDISCUSSIO occupying this type of habitat and to collect During the sampling we collected 1232 specimensfromasmanyhabitatsaspossible,taking terrestrialisopods.Weidentify19speciesbelonging in account the impact of soil quality on their to 10 families. The lagoons were the richest in distribution. isopod specimens (64.8 % out of the total isopods foundin7sites),whereasthelowestdiversityvalues Impact of soil quality on the distribution of terrestrial isopods in some Tunisian wetlands wereobservedforhillreservoirs(5.9%).Thedams, In the dams, 6 species were found among them, 3 the sebkhas and the rivers contained nearly the species were abundant: Armadillidium pelagicum similarnumberofisopodsspecimens. (27.9 %), Armadillidium sulcatum (21.7 %) and Most of terrestrial isopods were Chaetophiloscia Porcellio variabilis (27.1%). cellaria (relative abundance is equal to 29.5 %), Inthesebkhas,9speciesweresampledamongthem Porcellio laevis (23,5 %) and Porcellio variabilis Porcellio laevis (19.6 %), Ligia italica (23.4 %) and (11,1 %). These three species have the highest Armadillidium granulatum (21.5 %) were the most regionaldistributionvalue; Chaetophiloscia cellaria abundant. cameupin9(50%), Porcellio laevis in8(44.5%) Intheriversstudied,6specieswerecollectedamong and Porcellio variabilis in 11 (61.1 %) of the 18 them two species were abundant: Chaetophiloscia wetlandssites.However,theremainingspecieswere cellaria (55.4%)and Porcellio variabilis (37.1%). foundoccasionallyinafewsites(Table2). Distribution analysis in the different studied Cleardifferenceswereseenbetweenstudysites biotopesshowedthatP orcellio variabilis wascollected both for species diversity and the number of whatever the type of the wetland. However, other specimens(Figure1): species such as, Armadillidium granulatum and In the lagoons, 16 species were sampled; among Armadillidium tunisiense occurredonlyinthesebkhas. them 2 species were relatively more abundant: Shannon indices calculated ranged between 2.79 to Chaetophiloscia cellaria (relativeabundanceisequal 1.4.Thehighestdiversitywasinthesebkhas,followed to36.2%)and Porcellio laevis (31.9%). bylagoons(2.54)anddams(2.25).Pielou’sevenness Inthehillreservoirs,only4specieswerecollected, index(J’)variedfrom0.69(inhillreservoirs)to2.24 among them Armadillidium pelagicum was the most (inlagoons)(Table3). abundant(65.8%). Community similarity estimated by the Bray closedbiotopes.ThevalueofBrayCurtisindexisthe Curtisindex(basedonspeciescomposition)revealed lowest between hill reservoirs and lagoons then that the highest similarity was found between the betweenhillreservoirsandsebkhas(13.8and13.9% damsandthehillreservoirs(74.8%)whicharetwo respectively)(Figure2). Table1.Listofsamplingsites Typeofwetlands Station Code Altitudelatitude Dam ElFartout D.Fart N37°10'03.1"E010°09'57.7" Lebna D.Leb N36°44'26.8"E010°55'27.9" OuedElHajar D.OElH N36°51'08.4"E011°01'01.6" River Lebna R.Leb N36°39'13.8"E010°54'31.3" Tinja(Korsi) R.Tj N37°11'12.5"E009°46'52.3" Lagoon GharElMelehS1 Lg.GEM1 N37°10'03.1"E010°09'57.7" GharElMelehS2 Lg.GEM2 N37°10'04.7"E010°11'40" GharElMelehS3 Lg.GEM3 N37°10'09.4"E010°13'12.6" SidiAliMakki Lg.SAM N37°09'50.7"E010°14'45.1" Korba Lg.Kor N36°38'12.9"E010°54'11.9" Tazarka Lg.Taz N36°32'20.3"E010°50'38.7" Bizerte Lg.Biz N37°13'8"E009°55'1" Sebkha ElWafi S.ElW N37°10'12.6"E010°12'6" ElKalbia S.ElKal N35°54'25.2"E010°17'08.6" Hillreservoir ElMorra Hr.Mor N37°05'53.4"E009°59'08.8" ElBasbassia Hr.Bas N37°04'07.1"E009°55'19.1" ElAkkari Hr.ElAk N37°04'15.1"E009°55'47.1" ElHanaya Hr.ElHan N37°04'11.1"E009°55'34.1"

132 H. Khemaissia, C. Souty-Grosset, K. Nasri-Ammar

Table2.Frequencyofoccurrenceofthespecies Thespecies Frequencyofoccurrence

Porcellio variabilis 11 Chaetophiloscia cellaria 9 Porcelio laevis 8 Armadillidium pelagicum 6 Chaetophiloscia elongata 4 Porcellionides pruinosus 4 Leptotrichus panzeri 3 3 Armadillo officinalis 3 Armadillidium sulcatum 3 Porcellionides sexfasciatus 2 Tylos europaeus 2 Ligia italica 2 Chaetophiloscia sicula 2 Porcellio lamellatus 2 Armadillidium tunisiense 1 Armadillidium granulatum 1 Armadilloniscus littoralis 1 Halophiloscia sp. 1 Figure1.Distributionofcollectedisopodsinthedifferentsites

133 Impact of soil quality on the distribution of terrestrial isopods in some Tunisian wetlands

Table3.Speciesdiversityinthestudiedbiotopes;H’,ShannonWienerindex;J’,Pieloudevenessindex Numberofspecimenscollected H' J' Lagoons 799 2.54 2.24 Dams 129 2.25 1.02 Rivers 124 1.4 1.03 Sebkhas 107 2.79 1.71 Hillreservoirs 73 1.44 0.69 Total 1232 Terrestrial isopods were collected in soil having agriculturalpracticesorbythefactthattheyrepresent salinity between 0.9 and 35.4 g/kg. The maximum a closed area. For exemple, in carabids, it has been species richness (8 species) was observed for both shown that species diversity is higher in the open stations; Lg.Biz and Lg.GEM2 with salinity ecosystems than in forest areas (Bedford & Usher, respectively equal to 34 and 7.8 g / kg. The 1994). Chaetophiloscia cellaria ,aspecieswithawide distribution of terrestrial isopods on the basis of Mediterraneandistribution(Vilisics&Lapange,2005) increasedsalinityofthesoilshowedthatthedegreeof and Porcellio laevis ,awidespreadspeciesinTunisia tolerancevariedamongspecies.Indeed,individualsof (MediniBou Aziz, 2002), are the most abundant Chaetophiloscia cellaria and Porcellio laevis had a species. From these data, it was apparent that the wide tolerance up to35.4g / kg.Other species, such differenceinthedistribution ofisopodsdependedon as, Armadillidium granulatum and Armadillo the nature of the habitat which is influenced by the officinalis were found at stations with low salinity soil quality. Van Straalen & Verhoef (1997) showed which did not exceed8.5 g / kg. Concerning the that (Collembola, Oribatida and isopods) species Armadillidium tunisiense its distribution was havethetendenciestosettle ina gradientof soilpH limitedtostations withlowersalinityequalto0.9g/ from 2 to 9. According to our field data, kg(Fig.3). Chaetophiloscia cellaria , Armadillidium vulgare , According to our field data, it seems that Armadillidium pelagicum , Porcellio variabilis and Chaetophiloscia cellaria and Porcellio laevis tolerate Porcellio laevis toleratealargevariationofsoilpH. asoilaciditythatrangesfrom8.02to9.43(Figure4). Basedonthepresentstudy,isopodsarenotevenly 4.COCLUSIO distributedamongthevariouswetlands;theyvariedin Thispreliminarystudyshowsthatspeciesrichness numberofspeciesaswellasinnumberofindividuals. and isopod communities’ structure is very important It has been shown that lagoons are the most diverse inwetlands.Intheseareas,changesofenvironmental habitat.Infact,comparingwithotherstudiesdoneon factorssuchassalinityorpHvaluehaveaneffecton isopoddiversityinlagoons,weshowthatoursitesare the distribution of terrestrial isopods. These evendiverse(eightspeciesinLg.BizandLg.GEM2) arthropods are used as bioindicators and can detect thanotherslagoonsinthe world.It’sthecaseofthe any changes affecting the ecological quality of the Ria Farmosa lagoon where only four species coexist environments.Otherparameterssuchaslevelsofsoil (Dias et al. 2005). The low number of species calcium,potassiumandmagnesiumarenowmeasured observedinhillreservoirs,inriversandindamscould in order to assess the preferendum of each species be explained by the human activity, especially the collected.

Figure2.Clusteringofsamplingsitesbasedonspeciesdiversity

134 H. Khemaissia, C. Souty-Grosset, K. Nasri-Ammar

Species Armadillidium sulcatum Armadillidium vulgare Armadillidium granulatum Armadilloniscus littoralis Armadillidium tunisiense Chaetophiloscia sicula Porcellio lamellatus Armadillo officinalis

Chaetophiloscia elongata Porcellio variabilis Porcellionides sexfasciatus Leptotrichus panzeri Tylos europaeus Armadillidium pelagicum

Ligia italica Porcellionides pruinosus Chaetophiloscia cellaria Porcellio laevis

5 15 25 35 45 Soil salinity (g/kg) Figure3.ToleranceofTerrestrialIsopodstochangesinsoilsalinity Species

Armadillidium sulcatum Armadillidium vulgare

Armadillidium tunisiense Armadillidium granulatum Armadilloniscus littoralis Chaetophiloscia sicula Porcellio lamellatus Armadillo officinalis

Porcellio variabilis

Porcellionides sexfasciatus Porcellionides pruinosus Leptotrichus panzeri Tylos europaeus Armadillidium pelagicum Ligia italica

Porcellio laevis Chaetophiloscia cellaria

8,2 8,6 8,8 9 9,2 9,4 pHvalues Figure4.ToleranceofTerrestrialIsopodstochangesinsoilpH

135 Impact of soil quality on the distribution of terrestrial isopods in some Tunisian wetlands

5.ACKOWLEDGEMET (,Oniscidea).C.R.Acad.Sci.Paris,327:335 Our thanks for the research project N° 07G0918 342. CMCU FrancoTunisian "Diversité et structure des HamaïedMelki, S., 2008. Systématique, Répartition peuplements des Crustacés Isopodes Terrestres bio géographiqueetEcoBiologiedugenre Armadillidium (Brandt,1833)enTunisie.ThèseDoctorat,Facultédes indicateursdelaqualitéd’habitat". SciencesdeTunis,pp.1211. Kacem, H., Rezig, M., 1995. Cycle biologique 6. REFERECES d’Hemilepistus reaumuri (Audouin et Savigny, 1826) (Crustacé, Isopode, Oniscoϊde). Bull. Soc. Sc. nat. Achouri, M.S., CharfiCheikhrouha, F., 2001. Etude Tunisie,24:5665. morphologique et répartition géographique de Khemaissia, H., NasriAmmar, K., 2008. Life cycle and Porcellionides sexfasciatus (BuddeLund, 1885) reproductionof Porcellio lamellatus BuddeLund,1885 IsopodeterrestredeGaratNaâm,Tunisie.Crustaceana, from Menzel Jemil lagoon. Proceeding of the 74(8):765775. internationalsymposiumofterrestrialisopodsbiology Achouri, M.S., CharfiCheikhrouha, F., 2002. Biologie et ISTIB07,7580. dynamique de population de Porcellionides Khemaissia,H.,NasriAmmar,K.,2010.Caractérisationdu sexfasciatus (BuddeLund, 1885) (Crustacea, Isopoda, cyclereproducteurdesfemellesde Porcellio lamellatus Oniscidea).C.R.Acad.Sci.Paris,325(1):605616. (Isopoda,Oniscidea)provenantdesbergesdelalagune Achouri,M.S.,CharfiCheikhrouha,F.,Marques,J.C.,2003. deBizerte.Crustaceana,inpress. Biology, population and fieldgrowth rates of Medini,L.,NasriAmmar,K.,CharfiCheikhrouha,F.,2000. Porcellionides pruinosus (Isopoda,Oniscidea)atGarat Reproduction saisonnière de Porcellio variabilis Naam(Kasserine,Tunisia).Crustaceana,75(10):1241 (Lucas, 1846) (Crustacea, Isopoda, Oniscidea). C. R. 1262. Acad.Sci.Paris,323:689695. Achouri, M.S., CharfiCheikhrouha, F., 2005. Variabilité MediniBouaziz, L., 2002. Systématique, Biologie et morphologique et reproductive de Porcellionides Biogéographie du genre Porcellio en Tunisie pruinosus (Brandt, 1833) en Tunisie (Isopoda, (Crustacés, Isopodes Oniscidea). Thèse Doctorat, Oniscidea).Crustaceana, 78(8):897916. FacultédesSciencesdeTunis,pp.1230. Bedford,S.E.,Usher,M.B.,1994.Distributionof Nasri,K.,Juchault,P.,Mocquard,J.P.,SoutyGrosset,C., species across the margins of farm woodlands. 1996. Reproduction saisonnière chez Hemilepistus Agriculture, Ecosystems end Environments, 48: 295 reaumuri (Audouin & Savigny, 1826), Isopode 305. Terrestre des zones semiarides. Crustaceana, 69(2): Dias,N.,Sprung,M.,Hassal,M.,2005.Theabundanceand 223235. lifehistoriesofterrestrialisopodsinasaltmarshofthe VanStraalen,N.M.,Verhoef,H.A.,1997.Thedevelopment RiaFormosalagoonsystem,southernPortugal.Marine of a bioindicator system for soil acidity based on Biology,147:13431352. arthropodpHpreferences.J.Appl.Ecol.,34:217232. Hamaïed, S., CharfiCheikhrouha, F., 2004. Life cycle and Vandel, A., 1960. Isopodes terrestres, 1. Faune de France. population dynamic of Armadillidium pelagicum Paris. Arcangeli,1955(Isopoda,Oniscidea)atAouina.C.R. Vandel, A., 1962. Isopodes terrestres, 2. Faune de France. Acad.Sci.Paris,327:343352. Paris. Hamaïed, S., NasriAmmar, K., CharfiCheikhrouha, F., Vilisics, F., Lapange, A., 2005. Terrestrial Isopods 2004.Phénologiedelareproductiond’unepopulation (Isopoda:Oniscidea)fromtheSlovenianKarst.Natura naturellede Armadillidium pelagicum Arcangeli,1955 Sloveniae,7(1):1321.

136