Table of Contents

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Table of Contents Revised Draft Technical Background Report ‐ Area A Official Community Plan Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Location ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Planning Area Boundary ........................................................................................................................... 5 Developed Portions of Planning Area ....................................................................................................... 6 Photos of the Planning Area ..................................................................................................................... 7 1.0 Part One: Community Profile ................................................................................................................ 14 1.1 Natural Environment ......................................................................................................................... 14 Land Forms .......................................................................................................................................... 14 Geology ............................................................................................................................................... 14 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Soils ..................................................................................................................................................... 15 Climate ................................................................................................................................................ 15 Vegetation and Forests ....................................................................................................................... 15 Sensitive Ecosystems and Endangered Species .................................................................................. 15 Wildlife ................................................................................................................................................ 16 Freshwater Fisheries ........................................................................................................................... 16 Marine Environment ........................................................................................................................... 16 1.2 First Nations History .......................................................................................................................... 16 Tla’amin Nation ................................................................................................................................... 16 Klahoose Nation .................................................................................................................................. 18 Homalco Nation .................................................................................................................................. 18 1.3 Settlement History ............................................................................................................................ 18 Settlements and Land Use .................................................................................................................. 19 Community Infrastructure .................................................................................................................. 20 Transportation .................................................................................................................................... 21 1.4 Economy ............................................................................................................................................ 21 1.5 Demographic Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 22 Population ........................................................................................................................................... 22 1 | Page Revised Draft Technical Background Report ‐ Area A Official Community Plan Projections .......................................................................................................................................... 24 2.0 Review of Background Documents ....................................................................................................... 25 2.1 Environment ...................................................................................................................................... 25 Malaspina Master Plan (1979) ............................................................................................................ 25 Powell River Regional District Tsunami Report (2007) ....................................................................... 28 Powell River Regional District RAR Implementation Report (2008) ................................................... 28 Theodosia Watershed Climate Change Impacts and Adaptations Plan (2012) .................................. 29 Identification of Natural Hazard Areas Malaspina Peninsula / Okeover Inlet (2013)......................... 30 2.2 First Nations ...................................................................................................................................... 32 Protocol Agreement for Communication and Cooperation (2004) .................................................... 32 Sliammon/Powell River Regional District Harmonization Project Final Report (2008) ...................... 33 Tla’amin Land Use Plan (2010) ............................................................................................................ 35 Tla’amin Final Agreement (2011) ........................................................................................................ 36 2.3 Sustainability ..................................................................................................................................... 37 A Sustainability Charter for the Powell River Region (2010) .............................................................. 37 2.4 Economic Development .................................................................................................................... 39 The Malaspina Okeover Coastal Plan (2004) ...................................................................................... 39 Powell River Regional District Growth and Development Analysis (2008) ......................................... 41 Economic Development Plan for Agriculture (2009) .......................................................................... 42 Powell River Regional Business Inventory (2013) ............................................................................... 42 2.5 Parks and Recreation ........................................................................................................................ 44 Regional District Parks and Greenspace Plan (2010) .......................................................................... 44 2.6 Community ........................................................................................................................................ 44 Lund Official Community Plan (1998) ................................................................................................. 44 Powell River’s Vital Signs (2012) ......................................................................................................... 47 References .................................................................................................................................................. 50 Map Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 52 2 | Page Revised Draft Technical Background Report ‐ Area A Official Community Plan Introduction This technical background report is a foundational document for the new Electoral Area A Official Community Plan. The report has been prepared in two parts for ease of reference. Part one provides a community profile for the planning area with discussion of the natural environment, first nation history, settlement history, economy and demography. Part two provides a summary of background documents that include critical information for understanding the environmental, social and economic context of the community and the wider Powell River region. Understanding the issues and recommendations outlined in these background documents will help inform the identification of planning issues and policy considerations options for the new official community plan. Location Powell River Regional District ‐ Electoral Area A is located on the beautiful upper Sunshine Coast mainland and encompasses Malaspina Peninsula, Powell Lake Watershed, Theodosia Watershed and Toba Inlet. Electoral Area A also contains Savary, Hernando, Copeland and Mink Islands and many other smaller islands located in Desolation Sound and Malaspina Inlet. Area A is the largest and northern‐ most electoral area within the Powell River Regional District. To the north of Electoral Area A lies Bute Inlet and Strathcona Regional District; to the west is the Salish Sea and Vancouver Island; to the south is the Village of Teeshohsum (Sliammon IR #1) and the City
Recommended publications
  • Malaspina Draft MP
    MANAGEMENT P LAN November 2003 for: Malaspina Provincial Park Environmental Stewardship Lower Mainland Region Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection Malaspina Provincial Park MANAGEMENT LAN P Environmental Stewardship Lower Mainland Region Malaspina Provincial Park ANAGEMENT M LAN P November 2003 Approved by: _____________________ Date: _____________ Regional Manager ____________________ Date:_____________ Assistant Deputy Minister 3 Note to Readers: Provincial parks are managed by the Environmental Stewardship Division of the Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection. BC Parks is one component of Environmental Stewardship and in this document, the term BC Parks is used to represent the Environmental Stewardship Division. Occasionally the term “Protected Areas” or “Protected Area Strategy” is used to refer to broader Provincial policies and land use planning processes that refer to both Provincial Parks and other forms of Protected Areas. Desolation Sound Marine Park, Copeland Islands Marine Park, and Okeover Arm Provincial Park are also located in this region but are covered under their own specific Management Plan. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..............................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................................................8 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................8 Management
    [Show full text]
  • British Columbia Regional Guide Cat
    National Marine Weather Guide British Columbia Regional Guide Cat. No. En56-240/3-2015E-PDF 978-1-100-25953-6 Terms of Usage Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. Disclaimer: Her Majesty is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the reproduced material. Her Majesty shall at all times be indemnified and held harmless against any and all claims whatsoever arising out of negligence or other fault in the use of the information contained in this publication or product. Photo credits Cover Left: Chris Gibbons Cover Center: Chris Gibbons Cover Right: Ed Goski Page I: Ed Goski Page II: top left - Chris Gibbons, top right - Matt MacDonald, bottom - André Besson Page VI: Chris Gibbons Page 1: Chris Gibbons Page 5: Lisa West Page 8: Matt MacDonald Page 13: André Besson Page 15: Chris Gibbons Page 42: Lisa West Page 49: Chris Gibbons Page 119: Lisa West Page 138: Matt MacDonald Page 142: Matt MacDonald Acknowledgments Without the works of Owen Lange, this chapter would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Development Property Powell River, BC
    ® Residential Development Property Powell River, BC Jason Zroback Jamie Zroback [email protected] [email protected] 1 (604) 414-5577 1 (604) 483-1605 ® Marketing British Columbia to the World® “The Source” for Oceanfront, Lakefront, Islands, Ranches, Resorts & Land in British Columbia www.landquest.com www.landquest.com Residential Development Property Powell River, BC PROPERTY DETAILS LOCATION Located in the Cranberry community of Powell Listing Number: 21144 River, BC. Property borders Ortona Avenue to the west, Drake Street to the North with D.A. Evans $599,000 Price: Park across the street, Crown Avenue to the east, Taxes (2021): $1,652.22 and undeveloped acreage to the south. Size: 2.99 acres AREA DATA With a population of 20,000, this friendly seaside DESCRIPTION town offers ‘big city’ amenities and luxury services Powell River is extremely low in housing inventory without the ‘big city’ parking and traffic hassles. A and the demand to construct new subdivisions is at full-service hospital, medical, dental, chiropractic, an all-time high. physiotherapy and massage therapy clinics, health and beauty spas, a newly renovated recreation This 2.99 acre property is an infill lot in the complex, full banking facilities, marine services, Cranberry neighborhood, across from a park and outdoor guides and outfitters, plus a wide range of within walking distance to elementary and high retail outlets, art galleries, gift shops and fine dining schools. There is a community grocery store at the are all within easy access. end of the block, as well as a beer and wine store and neighborhood pub nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • Depaktment of Lands
    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ANNUAL REPORT OF THE LANDS AND SURVEY BRANCHES OF THE DEPAKTMENT OF LANDS FOR THE YEAE ENDED DEOEMBEE 31ST, 1925 HON T. D. PATTULLO, MINISTEK OF LANDS PRINTED BY AUTHORITY OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY. VICTORIA, B.C.: Printed by CHABLES F. BANFIELD, Printer to tbe King's Most Excellent Majesty. 1926. VICTORIA, B.C., September 22nd, 1926. To His Honour ROBERT RANDOLPH BRUCE, Lieutenant-Governor of the Province of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: Herewith I beg respectfully to submit the Annual Report of the Lands and Survey Branches of the Department of Lands for the year ended December 31st, 1925. T. D. PATTULLO, Minister of Lands. VICTORIA, B.C., September 22nd, 1926. The Honourable T. D. Pattullo, Minister of Lands, Victoria, B.C. SIR.—I have the honour to submit the Annual Report of the Lands and Survey Branches of the Department of Lands for the twelve months ended December 31st, 1925. I have the honour to be, Sir, Your obedient servant, G. R. NADEN, Deputy Minister of Lands. PART I. DEPARTMENT OE LANDS. TABLE OF CONTENTS. REPORT OF LANDS BRANCH. PAGE. Report of Superintendent of Lands 7 Pre-emption Records, etc 9 Pre-emption Inspections 10 Land-sales 11 Coal Licences, Leases, etc 11 Crown Grants issued 11 Revenue 12 Letters Inward and Outward 13 Summary, 1925 14 REPORT OF SURVEY BRANCH. PAGE. General Review of Survey-work 17 Details of Field-work 18 Office-work— Survey Division 21 Geographic Division 22 Table A.—Showing Acreages of each Class of Surveys gazetted since 1920 25 Table B.—Summary of Office-work 25 Table C.—Departmental Reference Maps : 27 Table D— List of Lithographed Maps 28 DEPARTMENT OF LANDS.
    [Show full text]
  • Anagement Plan for Desolation Sound and Copeland Islands Marine Parks and Tux'wnech Okeover Arm Provincial Park [Electronic Resource]
    M ANAGEMENT LAN P February 2008 for Desolation Sound and Copeland Islands Marine Ministry of Environment, Environmental Stewardship Parks and Tux’wnech Division Okeover Arm Provincial Park i Desolation Sound and Copeland Islands Marine Parks and Tux’wnech Okeover Arm Provincial Park M ANAGEMENT LAN P Prepared by Lower Mainland Region Environmental Stewardship Division ii Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication British Columbia. Environmental Stewardship Division Management plan for Desolation Sound and Copeland Islands Marine Parks and Tux'wnech Okeover Arm Provincial Park [electronic resource]. Electronic monograph in PDF format. ISBN 978-0-7726-6047-3 1. Desolation Sound Marine Park (B.C.)--Management. 2. Copeland Islands Marine Park (B.C.)--Management. 3. Tux'wnech Okeover Arm Park (B.C.) --Management. 4. Provincial parks and reserves--British Columbia--Management. 5. Marine parks and reserves--British Columbia--Management. 6. Ecosystem management--British Columbia. FC3815.D47B74 2008 333.78'30971131 C2008-906104-7 iii Desolation Sound and Copeland Islands Marine Parks and Tux’wnech Okeover Arm Provincial Park Management Plan Approved by: February 7, 2008 ______________________________ Date:_________________ Jennifer McGuire Regional Manager Environmental Stewardship Division February 7, 2008 ______________________________ Date:_________________ Nancy Wilkin Assistant Deputy Minister Environmental Stewardship Division iv v Table of Contents Acknowledgements ______________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • RG 42 - Marine Branch
    FINDING AID: 42-21 RECORD GROUP: RG 42 - Marine Branch SERIES: C-3 - Register of Wrecks and Casualties, Inland Waters DESCRIPTION: The finding aid is an incomplete list of Statement of Shipping Casualties Resulting in Total Loss. DATE: April 1998 LIST OF SHIPPING CASUALTIES RESULTING IN TOTAL LOSS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA COASTAL WATERS SINCE 1897 Port of Net Date Name of vessel Registry Register Nature of casualty O.N. Tonnage Place of casualty 18 9 7 Dec. - NAKUSP New Westminster, 831,83 Fire, B.C. Arrow Lake, B.C. 18 9 8 June ISKOOT Victoria, B.C. 356 Stranded, near Alaska July 1 MARQUIS OF DUFFERIN Vancouver, B.C. 629 Went to pieces while being towed, 4 miles off Carmanah Point, Vancouver Island, B.C. Sept.16 BARBARA BOSCOWITZ Victoria, B.C. 239 Stranded, Browning Island, Kitkatlah Inlet, B.C. Sept.27 PIONEER Victoria, B.C. 66 Missing, North Pacific Nov. 29 CITY OF AINSWORTH New Westminster, 193 Sprung a leak, B.C. Kootenay Lake, B.C. Nov. 29 STIRINE CHIEF Vancouver, B.C. Vessel parted her chains while being towed, Alaskan waters, North Pacific 18 9 9 Feb. 1 GREENWOOD Victoria, B.C. 89,77 Fire, laid up July 12 LOUISE Seaback, Wash. 167 Fire, Victoria Harbour, B.C. July 12 KATHLEEN Victoria, B.C. 590 Fire, Victoria Harbour, B.C. Sept.10 BON ACCORD New Westminster, 52 Fire, lying at wharf, B.C. New Westminster, B.C. Sept.10 GLADYS New Westminster, 211 Fire, lying at wharf, B.C. New Westminster, B.C. Sept.10 EDGAR New Westminster, 114 Fire, lying at wharf, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Recreation in the Desolation Sound Region of British Columbia
    MARINE RECREATION IN THE DESOLATION SOUND REGION OF BRITISH COLUMBIA by William Harold Wolferstan B.Sc., University of British Columbia, 1964 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of Geography @ WILLIAM HAROLD WOLFERSTAN 1971 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY December, 1971 Name : William Harold Wolf erstan Degree : Master of Arts Title of Thesis : Marine Recreation in the Desolation Sound Area of British Columbia Examining Committee : Chairman : Mar tin C . Kellman Frank F . Cunningham1 Senior Supervisor Robert Ahrens Director, Parks Planning Branch Department of Recreation and Conservation, British .Columbia ABSTRACT The increase of recreation boating along the British Columbia coast is straining the relationship between the boater and his environment. This thesis describes the nature of this increase, incorporating those qualities of the marine environment which either contribute to or detract from the recreational boating experience. A questionnaire was used to determine the interests and activities of boaters in the Desolation Sound region. From the responses, two major dichotomies became apparent: the relationship between the most frequented areas to those considered the most attractive and the desire for natural wilderness environments as opposed to artificial, service- facility ones. This thesis will also show that the most valued areas are those F- which are the least disturbed. Consequently, future planning must protect the natural environment. Any development, that fails to consider the long term interests of the boater and other resource users, should be curtailed in those areas of greatest recreation value. iii EASY WILDERNESS . Many of us wish we could do it, this 'retreat to nature'.
    [Show full text]
  • Flea Village—1
    Context: 18th-century history, west coast of Canada Citation: Doe, N.A., Flea Village—1. Introduction, SILT 17-1, 2016. <www.nickdoe.ca/pdfs/Webp561.pdf>. Accessed 2016 Nov. 06. NOTE: Adjust the accessed date as needed. Notes: Most of this paper was completed in April 2007 with the intention of publishing it in the journal SHALE. It was however never published at that time, and further research was done in September 2007, but practically none after that. It was prepared for publication here in November 2016, with very little added to the old manuscripts. It may therefore be out-of-date in some respects. It is 1 of a series of 10 articles and is the final version, previously posted as Draft 1.5. Copyright restrictions: Copyright © 2016. Not for commercial use without permission. Date posted: November 9, 2016. Author: Nick Doe, 1787 El Verano Drive, Gabriola, BC, Canada V0R 1X6 Phone: 250-247-7858 E-mail: [email protected] Into the labyrinth…. Two expeditions, one led by Captain Vancouver and the other led by Comandante Galiano, arrived at Kinghorn Island in Desolation Sound from the south on June 25, 1792. Their mission was to survey the mainland coast for a passage to the east—a northwest passage. At this stage of their work, they had no idea what lay before them as the insularity of Vancouver Island had yet to be established by Europeans. The following day, all four vessels moved up the Lewis Channel and found a better anchorage in the Teakerne Arm. For seventeen days, small-boat expeditions set out from this safe anchorage to explore the Homfray Channel, Toba Inlet, Pryce Channel, Bute Inlet, and the narrow passages leading westward through which the sea flowed back and forth with astounding velocity.
    [Show full text]
  • Megan Elizabeth Caldwell
    Northern Coast Salish Marine Resource Management by Megan Elizabeth Caldwell A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology University of Alberta © Megan Elizabeth Caldwell, 2015 Abstract This dissertation explores the traditional marine management systems of the Northern Coast Salish in British Columbia, Canada. Combining traditional knowledge with archaeological data, this dissertation seeks to understand the long-term history of ancestral Northern Coast Salish marine resource use and management. The substantive chapters present, respectively: a review of traditional marine management systems of the Northwest Coast; a typology of intertidal marine management features in Northern Coast Salish territory; and, an evaluation of ancestral Northern Coast Salish marine resource management by integrating data from intertidal features and zooarchaeological remains using a series of nested analytical scales. Overall, this dissertation shows that the ancestral Northern Coast Salish had an expansive, integrated system of marine management that allowed for sustained use of a key suite of taxa over several millennia. ii Preface The research presented in this dissertation was undertaken as part of the Tla’amin-Simon Fraser University Archaeology and Heritage Stewardship project led by Dr. Dana Lepofsky (Department of Archaeology, SFU) and Dr. John Welch (Department of Archaeology and School for Resource and Environmental Management, SFU), with Michelle Washington as the main liaison with Tla’amin First Nation. The fieldwork to gather data for this dissertation could not have been possible without the contributions of Lepofsky, Welch, and Washington, as well as additional members of the research team: Nyra Chalmer, Julia Jackley, Sarah Johnson, Bob Mui, Chris Springer, and Craig Turner.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Examination of House Architecture and Territoriality in the Salish Sea Region Over Five Millennia
    Territory, Tenure, and Territoriality Among the Ancestral Coast Salish of SW British Columbia and NW Washington State by Chris Springer M.A., Simon Fraser University, 2009 B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Archaeology Faculty of Environment © Chris Springer 2018 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Fall 2018 Copyright in this work rests with the author. Please ensure that any reproduction or re-use is done in accordance with the relevant national copyright legislation. Approval Name: Chris Springer Degree: Doctor of Philosophy (Archaeology) Territory, Tenure, and Territoriality Among the Title: Ancestral Coast Salish of SW British Columbia and NW Washington State Examining Committee: Chair: Jon Driver Professor Dana Lepofsky Senior Supervisor Professor Michael Blake Supervisor Professor Department of Anthropology University of British Columbia Ross Jamieson Supervisor Associate Professor Christina Giovas Internal Examiner Assistant Professor Elizabeth A. Sobel External Examiner Professor Department of Sociology and Anthropology Missouri State University Date Defended/Approved: September 26, 2018 ii Abstract Archaeological studies of territory, tenure, and territoriality seek to understand how past claims and access to land and resources were expressed across landscapes and through time. The foci of such studies include the spatial and temporal patterning of settlements, dwellings, conspicuous burials, monumental constructions, rock art, defensive features, and resources. In line with this research, this dissertation integrates ethnohistoric and archaeological data in three case studies that investigate the roles of house forms, the distribution of local and nonlocal obsidian, and the positioning of defensive networks in communicating territorial and tenurial interests among the ancestral Coast Salish of southwestern British Columbia and northwestern Washington state.
    [Show full text]
  • Bute Inlet Backgrounder
    BACKGROUNDER Watershed Watch Salmon Society February 5, 2009 THE BUTE INLET HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT 1 Q: Where will the proposed project take place? A: Bute Inlet is located on the south coast of British Columbia just north of Campbell River – about 250 km northwest of Vancouver. Q: What is planned for Bute Inlet by Plutonic Power? A: Plutonic Power, in partnership with Connecticut-based General Electric, wants to dam and divert 17 rivers that drain into Bute Inlet; more than a single project, the proposed development will see three distinct “clusters” of hydro projects, generating a total capacity of 1027 megawatts (MW). This network of many river diversions is being considered as a single project in the Province-led regulatory approvals process. Q: What makes this project unique compared to other proposed run-of-river projects? A: Plutonic’s Bute Inlet project is unprecedented in British Columbia in terms of sheer physical size, generating capacity, and environmental footprint: •The 1027 MW peak generating capacity of this single proposed development is greater than that of the massive Site C project planned for the Peace River – the difference being that Plutonic’s project would be less efficient and produce less energy than Site C, despite its colossal environmental footprint. •The project as proposed would require 443 km of new transmission line, 267 km of permanent roads, and 142 bridges, to be built in wilderness areas. Q: What is the regulatory process for approving the project? A: The Province of BC ultimately approves run-of-river projects. BC Hydro is responsible for issuing electricity purchase agreements which guarantee the public will buy the power generated by the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Five Easy Pieces on the Strait of Georgia – Reflections on the Historical Geography of the North Salish Sea
    FIVE EASY PIECES ON THE STRAIT OF GEORGIA – REFLECTIONS ON THE HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE NORTH SALISH SEA by HOWARD MACDONALD STEWART B.A., Simon Fraser University, 1975 M.Sc., York University, 1980 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Geography) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) October 2014 © Howard Macdonald Stewart, 2014 Abstract This study presents five parallel, interwoven histories of evolving relations between humans and the rest of nature around the Strait of Georgia or North Salish Sea between the 1850s and the 1980s. Together they comprise a complex but coherent portrait of Canada’s most heavily populated coastal zone. Home to about 10% of Canada’s contemporary population, the region defined by this inland sea has been greatly influenced by its relations with the Strait, which is itself the focus of a number of escalating struggles between stakeholders. This study was motivated by a conviction that understanding this region and the sea at the centre of it, the struggles and their stakeholders, requires understanding of at least these five key elements of the Strait’s modern history. Drawing on a range of archival and secondary sources, the study depicts the Strait in relation to human movement, the Strait as a locus for colonial dispossession of indigenous people, the Strait as a multi-faceted resource mine, the Strait as a valuable waste dump and the Strait as a place for recreation / re-creation. Each of these five dimensions of the Strait’s history was most prominent at a different point in the overall period considered and constantly changing relations among the five narratives are an important focus of the analysis.
    [Show full text]