DOCSLIB.ORG

Polar Bear Wildlife Viewing in Eeyou Istchee: an Assessment of Different Perspectives and Considerations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Polar bear wildlife viewing in Eeyou Istchee: An assessment of different perspectives and considerations Tariq Hossein A Thesis in The Department of Geography, Planning and Environment Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (Geography, Urban and Environmental Studies) at Concordia University Montréal, Québec, Canada April 2017 ©Tariq Hossein, 2017 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Tariq Hossein Entitled: Polar bear wildlife viewing in Eeyou Istchee: An assessment of different perspectives and considerations and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science (Geography, Urban and Environmental Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: Dr. Sébastien Caquard Chair Dr. Angela Kross (Department of Geography, Planning and Environment) Examiner Professor Robert Hopp (Department of Applied Human Sciences) Examiner Dr. Monica Mulrennan Supervisor Approved by _________________________________________ Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director __________________________________________ Dean of Faculty Date: Monday, April 10th, 2017 Abstract Wildlife tourism has been proposed as an alternative economic development opportunity for Indigenous communities in the Canadian north. Potential benefits include the employment of community members in land-based activities that enhance cultural identity, contribute to social well-being, support inter-generational knowledge transmission, and promote cross-cultural exchange. The extent to which wildlife tourism delivers on its promise is not well documented and tends to privilege the perspective of external experts over those of community members. Furthermore, a fuller appreciation of community expectations, concerns, and (mis)understandings is often lacking at the outset of a project with implications for its long-term success and acceptance. This thesis examines a polar bear viewing project proposed for the James Bay Cree community of Wemindji. It responds to an invitation from the Wemindji leadership to contribute information on the proposal by addressing two different aspects of the project. Firstly, it avails of geospatial technology to provide a preliminary population survey of the polar bears that can inform an assessment of the economic viability and likely wildlife impact of the project. Secondly, it uses semi-structured interviews with community members to document local perspectives on the project, including local assessments of potential benefits but also local concerns. The results of the population survey show that while geospatial technologies can provide a useful snapshot of polar bear population numbers and location, there are limitations to the accuracy and viability of these methods. The results of the community consultation affirm the value of local insights and the need to take full account of local perspectives before proceeding with a final decision on whether this project should proceed. iii Acknowledgements I would like to thank the Cree Nation of Wemindji in accepting me to do research in the community. Also the many people that I have come to know who helped bring this project forward including Fred Blackned, Henry Stewart, Dorothy Stewart, Chuck Matches and Charlene Wawatie. I am ever grateful for your insights, advice and support. Also to my peers in the Indigenous Research Management lab and the professors of the Geography, Planning and Environment department who on many occasions were generous with their feedback and advice. Most importantly I would like to thank Dr. Mulrennan for her patience with me, taking the time endlessly revising the chapters of the thesis. Without your encouragement and assurances, it would have been impossible to complete this work. My two ever so understanding kids Zaid and Sabrina that always accepted that I cannot be doing all the fun stuff with them. And my loving wife Marina, who understood the importance of me completing this work and supported me throughout this time. A sincere thank you to all of you! iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ………………………………………………………………………………..……………..…VI LIST OF TABLES ………………………………………………………………………………..……………..…VII LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ……………………………………………………………….….….………….....VIII CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ……………………..……………………………………………………………1 1.1 About Wemindji …………………………………………………………………………………………………...3 1.2 The polar bear tourism project …………………………………………………………………………………...4 1.3 Research objective ...……………………………………………………………………………………………...7 1.4 Context of the research …………………………………………………………………………………………….7 1.5 Organization of the thesis…………………………………………………………………………….…………….8 CHAPTER2: LITERATUREREVIEW…………...………...………………………………………………………9 2.1 Polar bear ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 2.2 Tourism………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…11 2.2.1 Ecotourism ……………………………………………………………………………………………………...11 2.2.2 Wildlife viewing tourism………………………………………………………………………………………12 2.3 Community based tourism……………………………………………………………………………………….13 2.4 Human and non-human interaction ………………………………………………………………...……………..15 CHAPTER 3: A VIEW FROM AFAR: APPLYING GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGY TO ASSESS POLAR BEAR ABUNDANCE ON NORTH AND SOUTH TWIN ISLANDS IN JAMES BAY, QUEBEC ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...17 1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………18 2 Polar Bear population status………………………………………………………………………………………...19 3 Polar bear surveying methods……………………………………………………………………………………….20 4 Study area …………………………………………………………………………………………………………23 5 Material and methods ……………………………………………………………………………………………….24 5.1 Satellite imagery analysis ……………………………………………………………………………………...….24 5.2 UAV ……………………………………………………………………………………...……………………….25 6 Results………………………………………………………………………………………………………………27 6.1 Satellite imagery analysis …………………………………………………………………………………………26 6.2 UAV………………………………………………………………………………………………………………29 7 Discussion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………..29 8 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………...………..30 CHAPTER 4: LOCAL CREE PERSPECTIVES ONPOLAR BEAR WILDLIFE VIEWING IN WEMINDJI.................................................................................................................................................................36 1 Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………...37 2 Study area: Cree Nation of Wemindji ……………………………………………………………………….............39 3 Methods …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….40 4 Polar bear viewing project …………………………………………………………………………………………..41 5 Results: Community perspectives on polar bear viewing tourism in Wemindji …………………………………….44 6 Discussion ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…52 7 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….55 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION ……………………………………………………………………………………..62 LITERATURE CITED ……………………………………………………………………………………………..64 APPENDICES ………………………………………………………………………………………………………78 v List of figures Figure 1.1 Location of Wemindji 3 Figure 2.1 Polar Bear sub populations map Source: IUCN website 9 (http://pbsg.npolar.no/en/status/population-map.html) Figure 3.1 Location of North and South Twin Island, James Bay 23 Figure 3.2 Example of high resolution satellite imagery used to detect polar 25 bears. Imagery provided by DigitalGlobe Foundation The images are of North Twin Island, James Bay, Quebec during late summer 2013 (A) and 2009 (B), where (A) is the target and (B) the reference and vice versa. White dot in image A represents a polar bear since a dot is absent in the reference image. Figure 3.3 Illustration of UAV distance and direction travelled, additional 27 viewing area, and camera panning. Figure 3.4 Location of identified polar bears on the North and South Twin 28 Island vi List of Tables Table 3.1 Comparison of wildlife population surveying methods 22 Table 3.2 Results of polar bear count on both Twin Islands of all images 29 analyzed vii List of Abbreviations CBT Community Based Tourism COTA Cree Outfitting and Tourism Association CTA Cree Trappers Association EMR Eeyou Marine Region EMRIRB Eeyou Marine Region Impact Review Board EMRPC Eeyou Marine Region Planning Commission EMRWB Eeyou Marine Region Wildlife Board IBA Important Bird Area IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature JBNQA James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement MPA Marine Protected Area NSTP Northern Scientific Training Program QCBS Québec Centre for Biodiversity Science SAR Search and Rescue SH Southern Hudson Bay TRC Truth and Reconciliation Commission UAV Unmanned aerial vehicle UNDRIP UN Declaration on the Rights of the Indigenous Peoples UNWTO United Nations Word Tourism Organization VHR Very high resolution viii Chapter 1: Introduction Tourism has been hailed for its potential to contribute socio-economic benefits in remote Indigenous communities. Potential economic benefits include diversification of the local economy through the development of new businesses (Reggers, Grabowski, Wearing, Chatterton, & Schweinsberg, 2016) and the creation of job opportunities (Buultjens and Gale 2013; Coria and Calfucura 2012; Zeppel 2006; Shikida A et al. 2010; Zapata et al. 2011). Tourism as a supplementary form of income in Indigenous communities can provide an alternative for those otherwise dependent on employment in resource extraction industries (i.e. mining, forestry). This is characterized by grueling hours and extended stays away from home, family connections,
Recommended publications
  • Department of Environment– Wildlife Division

    Department of Environment– Wildlife Division

    Department of Environment– Wildlife Division Wildlife Research Section Department of Environment Box 209 Igloolik, NU X0A 0L0 Tel: (867) 934-2179 Fax: (867) 934-2190 Email: [email protected] Frequently Asked Questions Government of Nunavut 1. What is the role of the GN in issuing wildlife research permits? On June 1, 1999, Nunavut became Canada’s newest territory. Since its creation, interest in studying its natural resources has steadily risen. Human demands on animals and plants can leave them vulnerable, and wildlife research permits allow the Department to keep records of what, and how much research is going on in Nunavut, and to use this as a tool to assist in the conservation of its resources. The four primary purposes of research in Nunavut are: a. To help ensure that communities are informed of scientific research in and around their communities; b. To maintain a centralized knowledgebase of research activities in Nunavut; c. To ensure that there are no conflicting or competing research activities in Nunavut; and d. To ensure that wildlife research activities abide by various laws and regulations governing the treatment and management of wildlife and wildlife habitat in Nunavut. 2. How is this process supported by the Nunavut Land Claims Agreement? Conservation: Article 5.1.5 The principles of conservation are: a. the maintenance of the natural balance of ecological systems within the Nunavut Settlement Area; b. the protection of wildlife habitat; c. the maintenance of vital, healthy, wildlife populations capable of sustaining harvesting needs as defined in this article; and d. the restoration and revitalization of depleted populations of wildlife and wildlife habitat.
  • LCSH Section J

    LCSH Section J

    J (Computer program language) J. I. Case tractors Thurmond Dam (S.C.) BT Object-oriented programming languages USE Case tractors BT Dams—South Carolina J (Locomotive) (Not Subd Geog) J.J. Glessner House (Chicago, Ill.) J. Strom Thurmond Lake (Ga. and S.C.) BT Locomotives USE Glessner House (Chicago, Ill.) UF Clark Hill Lake (Ga. and S.C.) [Former J & R Landfill (Ill.) J.J. "Jake" Pickle Federal Building (Austin, Tex.) heading] UF J and R Landfill (Ill.) UF "Jake" Pickle Federal Building (Austin, Tex.) Clark Hill Reservoir (Ga. and S.C.) J&R Landfill (Ill.) Pickle Federal Building (Austin, Tex.) Clarks Hill Reservoir (Ga. and S.C.) BT Sanitary landfills—Illinois BT Public buildings—Texas Strom Thurmond Lake (Ga. and S.C.) J. & W. Seligman and Company Building (New York, J. James Exon Federal Bureau of Investigation Building Thurmond Lake (Ga. and S.C.) N.Y.) (Omaha, Neb.) BT Lakes—Georgia USE Banca Commerciale Italiana Building (New UF Exon Federal Bureau of Investigation Building Lakes—South Carolina York, N.Y.) (Omaha, Neb.) Reservoirs—Georgia J 29 (Jet fighter plane) BT Public buildings—Nebraska Reservoirs—South Carolina USE Saab 29 (Jet fighter plane) J. Kenneth Robinson Postal Building (Winchester, Va.) J.T. Berry Site (Mass.) J.A. Ranch (Tex.) UF Robinson Postal Building (Winchester, Va.) UF Berry Site (Mass.) BT Ranches—Texas BT Post office buildings—Virginia BT Massachusetts—Antiquities J. Alfred Prufrock (Fictitious character) J.L. Dawkins Post Office Building (Fayetteville, N.C.) J.T. Nickel Family Nature and Wildlife Preserve (Okla.) USE Prufrock, J. Alfred (Fictitious character) UF Dawkins Post Office Building (Fayetteville, UF J.T.
  • Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(S): Hugh M

    Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(S): Hugh M

    Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I Author(s): Hugh M. Raup Source: Botanical Review, Vol. 7, No. 3, Botanical Problems in Boreal America. I (Mar., 1941), pp. 147-208 Published by: Springer on behalf of New York Botanical Garden Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4353246 Accessed: 15-12-2017 21:12 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Springer, New York Botanical Garden Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Botanical Review This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:12:58 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms THE BOTANICAL REVIEW VOL. VII MARCH, 1941 No. 3 BOTANICAL PROBLEMS IN BOREAL AMERICA. I HUGH M. RAUP Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University CONTENTS PAGE Introduction ................ ........................... 148 Acknowledgments . ........................................... 150 Exploration .............. ............................. 151 Physiographic History ........................................... 161 Climate ........................................................... 169 Origin and Distribution of the Flora Speciation and Endemism .173 The Theory of Persistence The Darwin-Hooker Concept ............................... 178 The Nunatak Hypothesis .......... .......... 181 Conservatism vs. Aggressiveness ............................. 184 Wynne-Edwards' Criticism of the Nunatak Hypothesis . 186 Discussion of Wynne-Edwards' Criticism .188 Hulten's Studies of Arctic and Boreal Biota Statement of the Problem .198 Plastic vs.
  • Walrus Hunting at Togiak, Bristol Bay, Soutwest Alaska

    Walrus Hunting at Togiak, Bristol Bay, Soutwest Alaska

    WALRUS HUNTING AT TOGIAK, BRISTOL BAY, SOUTHWEST ALASKA James A. Fall, Molly Chythlook, Janet Schichnes, and Rick Sinnott’ Technical Paper No. 212 ’ Fall: Division of Subsistence, Anchorage Chythlook and Schichnes: Division of Subsistence, Dillingham Sinnott: Division of Wildlife Conservation, Anchorage Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Juneau, Alaska October 1991 The Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, age, sex, or handicap. Because the department receives federal funding, any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against should write to: O.E.D. U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 , ABSTRACT The report provides an overview of historic and contemporary uses of Pacific walrus in the Bristol Bay region of southwest Alaska. It focuses on the community of Togiak (population 613) and its traditional use areas, including Round Island (Yup’ik Qayaciq, “place to go in a kayak”). As part of the Walrus Islands State Game Sanctuary, Round Island, a critical haul out site, has been closed to walrus hunting since 1960. In 1991, the Togiak Traditional Council submitted a proposal to the Alaska Board of Game to allow a limited hunt for 10 walrus on Round Island in October. Hunting of walrus and other marine mammals in western Bristol Bay, including Round Island, by the Native people of the Togiak area over the last 2,500 years is documented by archaeological and ethnohistorical evidence. Until the late 1930s and early 1940% well-organized groups of hunters from Togiak traveled in kayaks to Round Island (the most reliable hunting location) and other islands armed with spears and harpoons to harvest walrus.
  • Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus

    Atlantic Walrus Odobenus Rosmarus Rosmarus

    COSEWIC Assessment and Update Status Report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2006 COSEWIC COSEPAC COMMITTEE ON THE STATUS OF COMITÉ SUR LA SITUATION ENDANGERED WILDLIFE DES ESPÈCES EN PÉRIL IN CANADA AU CANADA COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. ix + 65 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Previous reports: COSEWIC 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 23 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Richard, P. 1987. COSEWIC status report on the Atlantic walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus (Northwest Atlantic Population and Eastern Arctic Population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-23 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge D.B. Stewart for writing the status report on the Atlantic Walrus Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada, overseen and edited by Andrew Trites, Co-chair, COSEWIC Marine Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: (819) 997-4991 / (819) 953-3215 Fax: (819) 994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Évaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la situation du morse de l'Atlantique (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) au Canada – Mise à jour.
  • 22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967

    22 AUG 2021 Index Acadia Rock 14967

    19 SEP 2021 Index 543 Au Sable Point 14863 �� � � � � 324, 331 Belle Isle 14976 � � � � � � � � � 493 Au Sable Point 14962, 14963 �� � � � 468 Belle Isle, MI 14853, 14848 � � � � � 290 Index Au Sable River 14863 � � � � � � � 331 Belle River 14850� � � � � � � � � 301 Automated Mutual Assistance Vessel Res- Belle River 14852, 14853� � � � � � 308 cue System (AMVER)� � � � � 13 Bellevue Island 14882 �� � � � � � � 346 Automatic Identification System (AIS) Aids Bellow Island 14913 � � � � � � � 363 A to Navigation � � � � � � � � 12 Belmont Harbor 14926, 14928 � � � 407 Au Train Bay 14963 � � � � � � � � 469 Benson Landing 14784 � � � � � � 500 Acadia Rock 14967, 14968 � � � � � 491 Au Train Island 14963 � � � � � � � 469 Benton Harbor, MI 14930 � � � � � 381 Adams Point 14864, 14880 �� � � � � 336 Au Train Point 14969 � � � � � � � 469 Bete Grise Bay 14964 � � � � � � � 475 Agate Bay 14966 �� � � � � � � � � 488 Avon Point 14826� � � � � � � � � 259 Betsie Lake 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agate Harbor 14964� � � � � � � � 476 Betsie River 14907 � � � � � � � � 368 Agriculture, Department of� � � � 24, 536 B Biddle Point 14881 �� � � � � � � � 344 Ahnapee River 14910 � � � � � � � 423 Biddle Point 14911 �� � � � � � � � 444 Aids to navigation � � � � � � � � � 10 Big Bay 14932 �� � � � � � � � � � 379 Baby Point 14852� � � � � � � � � 306 Air Almanac � � � � � � � � � � � 533 Big Bay 14963, 14964 �� � � � � � � 471 Bad River 14863, 14867 � � � � � � 327 Alabaster, MI 14863 � � � � � � � � 330 Big Bay 14967 �� � � � � � � � � � 490 Baileys
  • Bird Observations from Some Southeastern James Bay Islands, N.W.T

    Bird Observations from Some Southeastern James Bay Islands, N.W.T

    108 Bird Observations from Some Southeastern James Bay Islands, N.W.T. Y. Robert Tymstra Introduction assistance by Cree boatmen: Ninety-three bird species were Bernard Diamond and Richard observed during a survey of four­ Small ofWaskaganish. On the after­ teen islands and 'rocks' in south­ noon of 14 June, we departed for a eastern James Bay from 14 to 26 camp on the Quebec shore of James June 1995. The expedition was Bay, stopping briefly at Barboteau undertaken as part of the James Bay Rock in Rupert Bay. The following Islands Avifaunal Survey, a long­ morning, we moved to Strutton term series of investigations Island where we set up a base camp designed to discover more about the for five days and made forays to breeding distribution and migratory four islets to the north. On 20 June, movements of birds in and around we moved camp to Charlton Island the islands of James Bay. (Editors' and explored nearby Danby and Note: these islands are closely asso­ Carey Islands, as well as Wolf Islet ciated geographically and ornitho­ and Cormorant Rock. The final logically with nearby mainland base camp was established on Tent Ontario, and hence are of particular Island from 22 to 26 June. McNab interest to the province's birders.) Rock and Stag Rock were investi­ Several species new to the James gated briefly on the return to Bay island region were found, includ­ Waskaganish. Records are also pre­ ing Homed Grebe, Wood Duck, sented from a short visit to Yellow Rail, Great Black-backed Charlton Island, 11-14 June 1992, by Gull, Mourning Dove, and American Paul Tymstra and the author.
  • Arctic Environmental Strategy Summary of Recent Aquatic Ecosystem Studies Northern Water Resources Studies

    Arctic Environmental Strategy Summary of Recent Aquatic Ecosystem Studies Northern Water Resources Studies

    Arctic Environmental Strategy Summary of Recent Aquatic Ecosystem Studies Northern Water Resources Studies Arctic Environmental Strategy Summary ofRecent Aquatic Ecosystem Studies August 1995 Northern Affairs Program Edited by J. Chouinard D. Milburn Published under the authority of the Honourable Ronald A. Irwin, P.C., M.P., Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development Ottawa, 1995 QS-8507-030-EF-Al Catalogue No. R72-244/1-1995E ISBN 0-662-23939-3 © Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada FOREWORD The Arctic Environmental Strategy (AES), announced in April 1991, is a six-year $100 million Green Plan initiative. The overall goal ofthe AES is to preserve and enhance the integrity, health, biodiversity and productivity ofour Arctic ecosystems for the benefit ofpresent and future generations. Four specific programs address some ofthe key environmental challenges: they are waste cleanup, contaminants, water management, and environment and economy integration. The programs are managed by the Northern Affairs Program ofthe Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND); however, there is a strong emphasis on partnerships with northern stakeholders including Native organizations, other federal departments and the territorial governments. The AES Action on Water Program specifically strives to enhance the protection ofnorthern freshwaters through improved knowledge and decision-making. Water Resources managers in the Yukon and the Northwest Territories administer this Program which focuses on freshwater aquatic ecosystems. This report is the first detailed compilation ofstudies.conducted under the AES Action on Water Program. It covers work done from 1991 to 1994. Many studies have been concluded, while others are ongoing. Although data may not be available for all studies, or results are preliminary at this time, this report presents detailed background, objectives and methodology.
  • Qikiqtani Region Arctic Ocean

    Qikiqtani Region Arctic Ocean

    OVERVIEW 2017 NUNAVUT MINERAL EXPLORATION, MINING & GEOSCIENCE QIKIQTANI REGION ARCTIC OCEAN OCÉAN ARCTIQUE LEGEND Commodity (Number of Properties) Base Metals, Active (2) Mine, Active (1) Diamonds, Active (2) Quttinirpaaq NP Sanikiluaq Mine, Inactive (2) Gold, Active (1) Areas with Surface and/or Subsurface Restrictions 10 CPMA Caribou Protection Measures Apply ISLANDS Belcher MBS Migratory Bird Sanctuary NP National Park Nares Strait Islands NWA National Wildlife Area - ÉLISABETH Nansen TP Territorial Park WP Wildlife Preserve WS Wildlife Sanctuary Sound ELLESMERE ELIZABETHREINE ISLAND Inuit Owned Lands (Fee simple title) Kane Surface Only LA Agassiz Basin Surface and Subsurface Ice Cap QUEEN Geological Mapping Programs Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office ÎLES DE Kalaallit Nunaat Boundaries Peary Channel Müller GREENLAND/GROENLAND NLCA1 Nunavut Settlement Area Ice CapAXEL Nunavut Regions HEIBERG ÎLE (DENMARK/DANEMARK) NILCA 2 Nunavik Settlement Area ISLAND James Bay WP Provincial / Territorial D'ELLESMERE James Bay Transportation Routes Massey Sound Twin Islands WS Milne Inlet Tote Road / Proposed Rail Line Hassel Sound Prince of Wales Proposed Steensby Inlet Rail Line Prince Ellef Ringnes Icefield Gustaf Adolf Amund Meliadine Road Island Proposed Nunavut to Manitoba Road Sea Ringnes Eureka Sound Akimiski 1 Akimiski I. NLCA The Nunavut Land Claims Agreement Island Island MBS 2 NILCA The Nunavik Inuit Land Claims Agreement Norwegian Bay Baie James Boatswain Bay MBS ISLANDSHazen Strait Belcher Channel Byam Martin Channel Penny S Grise Fiord
  • Factors Affecting the Site of Investment, and the Reliance on Savings for Arctic Breeders: the Capital–Income Dichotomy Revisited

    Factors Affecting the Site of Investment, and the Reliance on Savings for Arctic Breeders: the Capital–Income Dichotomy Revisited

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- Staff Research Publications Nebraska Game and Parks Commission 2006 Factors affecting the site of investment, and the reliance on savings for arctic breeders: the capital–income dichotomy revisited Marcel Klaassen Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Rijksstraat, [email protected] Kenneth F. Abraham Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Robert L. Jefferies University of Toronto Mark Vrtiska Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamestaff Klaassen, Marcel; Abraham, Kenneth F.; Jefferies, Robert L.; and Vrtiska, Mark, "Factors affecting the site of investment, and the reliance on savings for arctic breeders: the capital–income dichotomy revisited" (2006). Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- Staff Research Publications. 89. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebgamestaff/89 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nebraska Game and Parks Commission at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Game and Parks Commission -- Staff Research Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Factors affecting the site of investment, and the reliance on savings for arctic breeders: the capital–income dichotomy revisited Marcel Klaassen1,*, Kenneth F. Abraham2, Robert L. Jefferies3 & Mark Vrtiska4 Klaassen M., Abraham K.F., Jefferies R.L. & Vrtiska M. 2006. Factors affecting the site of investment, and the reliance on savings for arctic breeders: the capital–income dichotomy revisited. Ardea 94(3): 371–384. The extent to which migratory birds that breed in the Arctic and winter in southern biomes rely on residual body stores for reproduction is unre- solved.
  • An Overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem

    An Overview of the Hudson Bay Marine Ecosystem

    10–1 10.0 BIRDS Chapter Contents 10.1 F. GAVIIDAE: Loons .............................................................................................................................................10–2 10.2 F. PODICIPEDIDAE: Grebes ................................................................................................................................10–3 10.3 F. PROCELLARIIDAE: Fulmars...........................................................................................................................10–3 10.4 F. HYDROBATIDAE: Storm-petrels......................................................................................................................10–3 10.5 F. PELECANIDAE: Pelicans .................................................................................................................................10–3 10.6 F. SULIDAE: Gannets ...........................................................................................................................................10–4 10.7 F. PHALACROCORACIDAE: Cormorants............................................................................................................10–4 10.8 F. ARDEIDAE: Herons and Bitterns......................................................................................................................10–4 10.9 F. ANATIDAE: Geese, Swans, and Ducks ...........................................................................................................10–4 10.9.1 Geese............................................................................................................................................................10–5
  • Migrant Shorebird Use of Akimiski Island, Nunavut: a Sub-Arctic Staging Site

    Migrant Shorebird Use of Akimiski Island, Nunavut: a Sub-Arctic Staging Site

    Polar Biol (2012) 35:1691–1701 DOI 10.1007/s00300-012-1211-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Migrant shorebird use of Akimiski Island, Nunavut: a sub-arctic staging site Lisa A. Pollock • Kenneth F. Abraham • Erica Nol Received: 8 December 2011 / Revised: 30 May 2012 / Accepted: 4 June 2012 / Published online: 24 June 2012 Ó Springer-Verlag 2012 Abstract Determining the importance of stopover and density of 5,267 birds/km2 to the total 192 km2 mudflat staging areas to migrating shorebirds (Aves: Charadriifor- habitat on Akimiski Island yields an estimate of 1,011,264 mes) is essential if such habitats are to be successfully (421,098–1,601,429) shorebirds during fall migration, protected. Migration chronology, species composition, making Akimiski Island of Hemispheric importance as a length of stay, body condition, and estimated total abun- staging site for migrant arctic-breeding shorebirds. dance of shorebirds during spring and fall migratory peri- ods of 2008 and 2009 were documented on Akimiski Keywords Staging site Á Length of stay Á Calidris pusilla Á Island, Nunavut, Canada. Fourteen shorebird species were Calidris fuscicollis Á Population modeling Á Nunavut observed during spring point counts and 18 during fall. Semipalmated (Calidris pusilla) and White-rumped (C. fuscicollis) Sandpipers comprised about 80 % of all Introduction individuals observed. A greater number of species and individuals were observed during fall than spring in both The Canadian Arctic provides breeding grounds for mil- years. Radio-transmitters attached to juvenile Semipal- lions of shorebirds, with the majority of species traveling mated and Least (C. minutilla) Sandpipers indicated highly thousands of kilometers to reach these highly productive variable lengths of stay ranging up to 26 days in both areas (Morrison 1984; Wilson 1990).