DOCSLIB.ORG

Critique of Special Relativity (Prp-1)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Critique of Special Relativity (Prp-1) CRITIQUE OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY (PRP-1) INTRODUCTION In 1887 Michelson and Morley attempted to measure the ether drift caused by the motion of the earth (at 30 km/s) in its orbit around the sun. The null result surprised everybody and for 18 years physicists tried unsuccessfully to explain the enigma. Finally, in 1905, Einstein published his revolutionary Special Theory of Relativity (STR) which rejected the ether and was quite controversial. It survived because a better solution has never been found. This may now gradually be changing. The present “Critique of Special Relativity” (PRP-1) is the first in a series of papers about “Post-Relativity Physics” (PRP). It is organized in 3 parts: Part I discusses alternative solutions in PRP for experiments and observation explained by STR. Part II discusses false arguments in favor of Special Relativity. It shows how the Sagnac effect and the GPS system have a natural explanation in classical physics, thus eliminating the need for alternative explanations in Relativity. In addition it shows that the proposed alternatives cannot work due to a fundamental flaw in Special Relativity so that the Sagnac effect and the GPS system actually disprove Relativity. Part III discusses experiments and observations which clearly disprove Special Relativity. PART I - ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS IN PRP FOR EXPERIMENTS EXPLAINED IN STR 1. THE ASSUMPTION OF ATOMIC RESONANCE CONTRACTION (ARC) Atomic Resonance Contraction (ARC) is a surprisingly simple alternative to STR’s kinematics. If we assume that atoms and therefore all solid objects contract by a factor 1/γ 2 in the direction of motion through the ether and by a factor 1/γ perpendicular to that motion (where γ = 1/(1-β2)1/2 with β = vc/ ) most ether drift experiments can easily be explained in classical physics. When it was first conceived this assumption appeared to be quite reasonable. After all, Schrȍdinger’s wave equation with its eigenfunctions and eigenvalues implied that some sort of resonance was involved. Could it be that electromagnetic waves were circulating within the atom? If so their path times would be increased by a factor γ2 longitudinally and by a factor γ transversally. In order to maintain the resonance phenomena these increases would have to be offset by a differential contraction of the orbits. In PRP-3 (The Physics of Atomic resonance) we will see how this differential contraction is accomplished in classical physics. Copyright © 2015 George A. Adriaenssens. All rights reserved. PRP-1 1 1.1 The Michelson- Morley Experiment In 1887 Albert Michelson and Edward Morley [1] performed an experiment that would revolutionize the world of physics. The experiment used a Michelson interferometer shown schematically in Fig. 1. Light from an extended source S is partly transmitted and partly reflected by a half-silvered plate P. After reflection by the mirrors M1 and M2 it reaches the telescope T where interference fringes can be observed. E. Hecht [2], pp 397-403, shows how circular interference fringes are created using an extended source and how linear Fizeau fringes can be created by slightly tilting one of the mirrors (M2 in fig. 1). Constructive interference occurs between two traveling waves with the same frequency when their phase difference is zero and destructive interference occurs when their phase difference is π. For an orientation of the PM1 arm parallel to the horizontal component v of the velocity of the earth through the ether, the path-time for PM1 = L1 is Lv LL1 T=+==1 TT or 11 1+ 11 ++−−β c c cv c1 L1 1 and for M1P = L1 T = . 1− c 1+ β The roundtrip path-time (for PM1P) is 2L 1 TT=+= T 1 (1) 11+− 1 c 1− β 2 . For the transversal arm the roundtrip path-time (for PM2P) is 2L2 1 T2 = (2) c − β 2 1 assuming that the angle θ is defined by cosθ = vc / as shown in Fig. 2. This assumption is incorrect and will be further discussed in section 6. For L1 = L2 = L and β <<1 the difference in path-times L TT−≅β 2 . 12c When the interferometer is rotated over 90º the roles of L1 and L2 are reversed so that L TT− ≅− β 2 . 12 c Copyright © 2015 George A. Adriaenssens. All rights reserved. PRP-1 2 The combined difference 2(L/c)β2 should result in a shift of the interference fringes. In the actual experiment no shift was observed. 2 This null result can easily be explained by ARC: L1 is reduced to L1 (1− β ) and L2 is reduced 2 1/2 to L2 (1– β ) so that, using equations (1) and (2), 22LL TT−=12 − 12 cc which is a constant, not influenced by orientation or velocity. The null result could also be explained by a physical length contraction , independently proposed by Fitzgerald and by Lorentz, which reduces L1 to 2 1/2 2(LL12− ) 1 L1(1–β ) so that TT12−= . c 1− β 2 Since L1 was approximately equal to L2 in the Michelson interferometer this difference was too small to be detected. This will be further discussed in the next section. 1.2 The Kennedy and Thorndike Experiment In 1932 Roy Kennedy and Edward Thorndike [3] performed an extremely accurate and stable experiment, similar to that of Michelson and Morley but with widely different lengths L1 and L2. As we have seen in section 1.1, the path-time difference, when the Lorentz-Fitzgerald length contraction of (1–β2)1/2 is applied, is reduced to 2(LL12− ) 1 TT12−= c 1− β 2 This difference is not influenced by a rotation of the interferometer over 90° but is influenced by a change in β. At the time of the experiment Kennedy and Thorndike were already aware that the earth was moving with a velocity of about 400 km/s relative to the fixed stars and that the measurement of this velocity should vary considerably from season to season (see section 9.8, fig. 26). The stability of their interferometer over several weeks should have been sufficient to detect this variation. In the actual experiment no such variation was detected. This null result invalidated the Lorentz-Fitzgerald physical length contraction. As we have seen in section 1.1, ARC reduces the path-time difference to 22LL TT−=12 − 12 cc which is a constant, not influenced by orientation or velocity. 2. THE FABRY-PEROT INTERFEROMETER A typical example of a Fabry-Perot interferometer is illustrated in Fig. 3. Light from a point on an extended source is reflected back and forth between two parallel semi-silvered plates a distance δ apart. When the parallel beams a, b, c, d, … are focused by a lens one obtains very narrow circular interference fringes, each fringe corresponding to a different angle θ (see E. Hecht [2], section 9.6.1).The distance between these fringes is proportional to δ and , allowing for the interferometer to be used as a length “etalon” (the distance δ ) or for high precision measurements of . λ λ Copyright © 2015 George A. Adriaenssens. All rights reserved. PRP-1 3 Due to its inherent stability, it has been used e.g. to servo-stabilize lasers or to measure the speed of light [4](via c = ) with very high precision. In classical physics such a stability would not be possible because the path-time [ABCλν in fig. 3 = 2δ /(c cos )] for a round trip of the reflected light would be increased by a factor between and 2 depending on the direction of theθ motion of the interferometer through the ether. For velocities of about 400 km/s thisγ wouldγ mean variations of 2/2 of about1.8 x 10-6, whereas the precision of the speed of light measurements is 4 x 10-9. However these variations are eliminatedβ by corresponding ARC corrections. 3. FIZEAU and AIRY In 1851 Fizeau’s famous experiment with light circulating with and against flowing water showed a null result. Similarly in 1871 Sir George Airy showed that aberration did not change when a telescope was filled with water. In Special Relativity both experiments are explained by the relativistic addition of velocities. 1 c δ = − = Both experiments seemed to confirm Fresnel’s coefficient of drag 1 2 where n is n cm the index of refraction. cm is the speed of light in a transparent medium. It varies with the frequency of light for most substances. Incidentally, Fresnel died in 1827, 24 years before c Fizeau’s experiment. Fresnel’s coefficient of drag can be computed from cv' = + δ . A major m n problem with Fresnel’s theory is that it cannot explain why the index of refraction varies with the frequency of light. For Einstein this was an important consideration in support of Special Relativity. Fresnel’s concept of an elastic medium which is partially dragged along with the velocity v is incompatible with our model of the ether (see PRP-2). The solution in PRP is straightforward and is based on Richard Feynman’s “path integrals” discussed in much more detail by E. Hecht [2], sections 4.1 through 4.3. Hecht describes how light is transmitted. Of particular interest are fig. 4.6 and fig. 4.8. About fig. 4.8 he states that “most of the energy will go in the forward direction, and the beam will advance essentially undiminished”. This is directly applicable to the experiments of Fizeau and Airy. Copyright © 2015 George A. Adriaenssens. All rights reserved. PRP-1 4 4. HIGH PRECISION LASER EXPERIMENTS 4.1 Revised Laser Theory in PRP In sections 4.2 through 4.5 we will show how four high precision laser experiments can be explained in PRP based on a revised laser theory.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Michelson–Morley Experiment
    Michelson–Morley experiment Figure 1. Michelson and Morley's interferometric setup, mounted on a stone slab that floats in an annular trough of mercury The Michelson–Morley experiment was an attempt to detect the existence of the luminiferous aether, a supposed medium permeating space that was thought to be the carrier of light waves. The experiment was performed between April and July 1887 by Albert A. Michelson and Edward W. Morley at what is now Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, and published in November of the same year.[1] It compared the speed of light in perpendicular directions in an attempt to detect the relative motion of matter through the stationary luminiferous aether ("aether wind"). The result was negative, in that Michelson and Morley found no significant difference between the speed of light in the direction of movement through the presumed aether, and the speed at right angles. This result is generally considered to be the first strong evidence against the then-prevalent aether theory, and initiated a line of research that eventually led to special relativity, which rules out a stationary aether.[A 1] Of this experiment, Einstein wrote, "If the Michelson–Morley experiment had not brought us into serious embarrassment, no one would have regarded the relativity theory as a (halfway) redemption."[A 2]:219 Michelson–Morley type experiments have been repeated many times with steadily increasing sensitivity. These include experiments from 1902 to 1905, and a series of experiments in the 1920s. More recent optical
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of the Fizeau Aether Drag Experiment for An
    Implementation of the Fizeau Aether Drag Experiment for an Undergraduate Physics Laboratory by Bahrudin Trbalic Submitted to the Department of Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Physics at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY May 2020 c Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2020. All rights reserved. ○ Author................................................................ Department of Physics May 8, 2020 Certified by. Sean P. Robinson Lecturer of Physics Thesis Supervisor Certified by. Joseph A. Formaggio Professor of Physics Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . Nergis Mavalvala Associate Department Head, Department of Physics 2 Implementation of the Fizeau Aether Drag Experiment for an Undergraduate Physics Laboratory by Bahrudin Trbalic Submitted to the Department of Physics on May 8, 2020, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Physics Abstract This work presents the description and implementation of the historically significant Fizeau aether drag experiment in an undergraduate physics laboratory setting. The implementation is optimized to be inexpensive and reproducible in laboratories that aim to educate students in experimental physics. A detailed list of materials, experi- mental setup, and procedures is given. Additionally, a laboratory manual, preparatory materials, and solutions are included. Thesis Supervisor: Sean P. Robinson Title: Lecturer of Physics Thesis Supervisor: Joseph A. Formaggio Title: Professor of Physics 3 4 Acknowledgments I gratefully acknowledge the instrumental help of Prof. Joseph Formaggio and Dr. Sean P. Robinson for the guidance in this thesis work and in my academic life. The Experimental Physics Lab (J-Lab) has been the pinnacle of my MIT experience and I’m thankful for the time spent there.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sagnac Effect: Does It Contradict Relativity?
    The Sagnac Effect: Does it Contradict Relativity? By Doug Marett 2012 A number of authors have suggested that the Sagnac effect contradicts the original postulates of Special Relativity, since the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light is violated in rotating systems. [1,2,3] Sagnac himself designed the experiment of 1913 to prove the existence of the aether [4]. Other authors have attempted to explain the effect within the theoretical framework of relativity, even going as far as calling the effect “relativistic”.[5] However, we seek in this paper to show how the Sagnac effect contravenes in principle the concept of the relativity of time and motion. To understand how this happens and its wider implications, it is necessary to look first at the concept of absolute vs. relative motion, what the Sagnac effect implies about these motions, and what follows logically about the broader notions of space and time. Early Ideas Regarding Rotation and Absolute Motion: The fundamental distinction between translational and rotational motion was first pointed out by Sir Isaac Newton, and emphasized later by the work of Ernest Mach and Heinrich Hertz. One of the first experiments on the subject was Newton’s bucket experiment of 1689. It was an experiment to demonstrate that true rotational motion cannot be defined as relative rotation of a body with respect to surrounding bodies – that true motion and rest should be defined relative to absolute space instead. In Newton’s experiment, a bucket is filled with water and hung by a rope. If the rope is twisted around and around until it is tight and then released, the bucket begins to spin rapidly, not only with respect to the observers watching it, but also with respect to the water in the bucket, which at first doesn’t move and remains flat on its surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Michou Interferometer
    July 21st 2016 Michou interferometer Costel Munteanu Montreal, QC, Canada [email protected] Abstract: The speed of light c defined as a constant of nature is in fact the “two­way speed of light” ​ ​ calculated from the measured time of travel of light from a light source to a reflector and back to a detector situated next to the source. In a “two­way” experiment (like Fizeau­Foucault apparatus) the constant c is the harmonic mean of “forward” and “backward” speeds [13]. A simple ​ ​ ​ ​ Michelson­Morley interferometer with equal length arms detects a difference between the time of travel of light along its two perpendicular arms in certain frames of reference in motion or in gravitational field and this is interpreted as Lorentz–FitzGerald contraction of length in the direction of motion or along the gradient of gravitational field [5]. While no experiment seemed to allow the ​ ​ precise “one­way” measurement of speed of light, Lorentz­FitzGerald length contraction interpretation is preferred. In this article I present an interferometer that determines the difference between “forward” and “backward” speed of light in certain frames of reference ­ the anisotropy of speed of light along one direction ­ showing a flow of electromagnetic medium through the frame of reference of the device contradicting the Lorentz­FitzGerald length contraction hypothesis and bring proof for the first time of (local) preferred frame effects. The device determines the direction of the flow and allows to calculate the velocity of that flow using the measured (or calculated) value of canonical “two­way” speed of light c in that particular frame of reference and the anisotropy measured by the ​ ​ device presented herein.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fizeau Experiment – the Experiment That Led Physics the Wrong Path for One Century
    The Fizeau Experiment – the Experiment that Led Physics the Wrong Path for One Century Henok Tadesse, Electrical Engineer, BSc. Ethiopia, Debrezeit, P.O Box 412 Mobile: +251 910 751339; email: [email protected] or [email protected] 01December 2017 Abstract Although Fresnel's ether drag coefficient was ad hoc, its curious confirmation by the Fizeau experiment forced physicists to accept and adopt it as the main guide in the development of theories of the speed of light. Lorentz's 'local-time' , which evolved into the Lorentz transformations, was developed to explain the Fizeau experiment and stellar aberration. Given the logical, theoretical and experimental counter- evidences against the theory of relativity today, it turns out that the Fresnel's drag coefficient may not exist at all. The Fizeau experiment and the phenomenon of stellar aberration have no common physical basis. The result of the Fizeau experiment can be explained in a simple, classical way. It is as if nature conspired to lead physicists astray for more than one century. Alternative theories and interpretations for the ether drift experiments and invariance of Maxwell's equations will be proposed. Physicists rightly assumed the invariance of Maxwell's equations, but their deeply flawed conception of light as ordinary local phenomenon led them unnecessarily to seek an 'explanation' for this invariance, which was the Lorentz transformation. Einstein went down the wrong path when he sought an 'explanation' for the light postulate, when none was needed. The invariance of Maxwell's equations for light is a direct consequence of non-existence of the ether and there is no explanation for it for the same reason that there is no explanation for light being a wave when there is no medium for its propagation.
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Analysis of Generalized Sagnac Effect in the Standard Synchronization
    Theoretical Analysis of Generalized Sagnac Effect in the Standard Synchronization Yang-Ho Choi Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Kangwon National University Chunchon, Kangwon-do, 200-701, South Korea Abstract: The Sagnac effect has been shown in inertial frames as well as rotating frames. We solve the problem of the generalized Sagnac effect in the standard synchronization of clocks. The speed of a light beam that traverses an optical fiber loop is measured with respect to the proper time of the light detector, and is shown to be other than the constant c, though it appears to be c if measured by the time standard-synchronized. The fiber loop, which can have an arbitrary shape, is described by an infinite number of straight lines such that it can be handled by the general framework of Mansouri and Sexl (MS). For a complete analysis of the Sagnac effect, the motion of the laboratory should be taken into account. The MS framework is introduced to deal with its motion relative to a preferred reference frame. Though the one-way speed of light is other than c, its two-way speed is shown to be c with respect to the proper time. The theoretical analysis of the generalized Sagnac effect corresponds to the experimental results, and shows the usefulness of the standard synchronization. The introduction of the standard synchrony can make mathematical manipulation easy and can allow us to deal with relative motions between inertial frames without information on their velocities relative to the preferred frame. Keywords: Generalized Sagnac effect, Standard synchronization, Speed of light, Test theory, General framework for transformation PACS numbers: 03.30.+p, 02.10.Yn, 42.25.Bs This paper will be published in Can.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sagnac Effect and Pure Geometry Angelo Tartaglia and Matteo Luca Ruggiero
    The Sagnac effect and pure geometry Angelo Tartaglia and Matteo Luca Ruggiero Citation: American Journal of Physics 83, 427 (2015); doi: 10.1119/1.4904319 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.4904319 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/83/5?ver=pdfcov Published by the American Association of Physics Teachers Articles you may be interested in Temperature insensitive refractive index sensor based on single-mode micro-fiber Sagnac loop interferometer Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 181906 (2014); 10.1063/1.4876448 Transmission and temperature sensing characteristics of a selectively liquid-filled photonic-bandgap-fiber-based Sagnac interferometer Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 141104 (2012); 10.1063/1.3699026 Sagnac-loop phase shifter with polarization-independent operation Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 013106 (2011); 10.1063/1.3514984 Sagnac interferometric switch utilizing Faraday rotation J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07E702 (2009); 10.1063/1.3058627 Magnetic and electrostatic Aharonov–Bohm effects in a pure mesoscopic ring Low Temp. Phys. 23, 312 (1997); 10.1063/1.593401 This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AAPT content is subject to the terms at: http://scitation.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 130.192.119.93 On: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 17:40:31 The Sagnac effect and pure geometry Angelo Tartagliaa) and Matteo Luca Ruggiero DISAT, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, Torino, Italy and INFN, Sezione di Torino, Via Pietro Giuria 1, Torino, Italy (Received 24 July 2014; accepted 2 December 2014) The Sagnac effect is usually deemed to be a special-relativistic effect produced in an interferometer when the device is rotating.
    [Show full text]
  • Completed by Dufour & Prunier(1942)
    Sagnac(1913) completed by Dufour & Prunier(1942) Robert Bennett [email protected] Abstract The 1913 Sagnac test proved to be a critical experiment that refuted Special Relativity (as Sagnac intended) and supported a model of aether that could be entrained like material fluids. But it also generated more questions, such as: What is the Speed of Light(SoL) in the lab frame? What if the optical components of the interferometer were moving relative to each other..some in the lab frame, some in the rotor frame…testing the emission model of light transmission? What if the half beams were directed above the plane of the rotor? All these questions were answered in an extension of the Sagnac test done 29 years after the SagnacX by D&P. An analytic review of On a Fringe Movement Registered on a Platform in Uniform Motion (1942). Dufour and F. Prunier J. de Physique. Radium 3 , 9 (1942) P 153-162 On a Fringe Movement Registered on a Platform in Uniform Motion (1942). A Review .. we used an optical circuit entirely fixed to the rotating platform, as did Sagnac. Under these same conditions we found that the movement of fringes observed are similar within 6%, whether the light source and photographic receiver be dragged in the rotation of the platform, as in the experiments of Sagnac, or they remain fixed in the laboratory. Sagnac and D&P both found SoL = c +- v in the rotor frame. D&P found SoL = c +- v also, in the lab frame (optical bench at rest, empty platform spinning below it) This alone disproves Special Relativity, as SoL <> c The second series of experiments described here was aimed to explore the fringe displacement due to rotation, in entirely new conditions where the optical circuit of the two superimposed interfering beams is composed of two parts in series, one of which remains fixed in relation to the laboratory while the other is attached to the rotating platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagnac Effect: the Ballistic Interpretation
    Sagnac Effect: The Ballistic Interpretation A. A. Faraj [email protected] Abstract: The primary objective, in the present investigation, is to calculate time-of-flight differences between the co-rotating beam and the counter-rotating beam, over the optical square loop of the Sagnac interferometer, in accordance with the assumption of velocity of light dependent upon the velocity of the light source; and then to compare the obtained results to the computed time-of-flight differences between the same two beams, based on the assumption of velocity of light independent of the velocity of the light source. And subsequently, on the basis of the numerical results of those calculations, it's concluded that, because of the presence of ballistic beaming, the Sagnac interferometer, and rotating interferometers, generally, are incapable of providing any conclusive experimental evidence for or against either one of the two diametrically opposed assumptions, under investigation. In the 1913 Sagnac experiment, for instance, the numerical values of the time-of-flight differences, as predicted by these two propositions, differ from each other by no more than an infinitesimal fraction equal to about 10-30 of a second. Keywords: Sagnac effect; fringe shift; constant speed of light; angular velocity; ballistic speed of light; headlight effect; rotating interferometer; ballistic beaming. Introduction: Undoubtedly, one of the most common oversights in the calculations of Sagnac effect and related phenomena, on the basis of the proposition of ballistic velocity of light, in the published literature, is the incorrect assumption that light traveling at the velocity of c and light traveling at the velocity resultant of c & v must always have together and share in harmony the same exact light path.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Relativity: a Centenary Perspective
    Special Relativity: A Centenary Perspective Clifford M. Will McDonnell Center for the Space Sciences and Department of Physics Washington University, St. Louis MO 63130 USA Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Fundamentals of special relativity 2 2.1 Einstein’s postulates and insights . ....... 2 2.2 Timeoutofjoint ................................. 3 2.3 SpacetimeandLorentzinvariance . ..... 5 2.4 Special relativistic dynamics . ...... 7 3 Classic tests of special relativity 7 3.1 The Michelson-Morley experiment . ..... 7 3.2 Invariance of c ................................... 9 3.3 Timedilation ................................... 9 3.4 Lorentz invariance and quantum mechanics . ....... 10 3.5 Consistency tests of special relativity . ......... 10 4 Special relativity and curved spacetime 12 4.1 Einstein’s equivalence principle . ....... 13 4.2 Metrictheoriesofgravity. .... 14 4.3 Effective violations of local Lorentz invariance . ........... 14 5 Is gravity Lorentz invariant? 17 arXiv:gr-qc/0504085v1 19 Apr 2005 6 Tests of local Lorentz invariance at the centenary 18 6.1 Frameworks for Lorentz symmetry violations . ........ 18 6.2 Modern searches for Lorentz symmetry violation . ......... 20 7 Concluding remarks 21 References........................................ 21 1 Introduction A hundred years ago, Einstein laid the foundation for a revolution in our conception of time and space, matter and energy. In his remarkable 1905 paper “On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” [1], and the follow-up note “Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its Energy-Content?” [2], he established what we now call special relativity as one of the two pillars on which virtually all of physics of the 20th century would be built (the other pillar being quantum mechanics). The first new theory to be built on this framework was general relativity [3], and the successful measurement of the predicted deflection of light in 1919 made both Einstein the person and relativity the theory internationally famous.
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Effects on Satellite Navigation
    Ž. Hećimivić Relativistički utjecaji na satelitsku navigaciju ISSN 1330-3651 (Print), ISSN 1848-6339 (Online) UDC/UDK 531.395/.396:530.12]:629.056.8 RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS ON SATELLITE NAVIGATION Željko Hećimović Subject review The base of knowledge of relativistic effects on satellite navigation is presented through comparison of the main characteristics of the Newtonian and the relativistic space time and by a short introduction of metric of a gravity field. Post-Newtonian theory of relativity is presented as a background in numerical treating of satellite navigation relativistic effects. Time as a crucial parameter in relativistic satellite navigation is introduced through coordinate and proper time as well as terrestrial time and clocks synchronization problem. Described are relativistic effects: on time dilation, on time differences because of the gravity field, on frequency, on path range effects, caused by the Earth rotation, due to the orbit eccentricity and because of the acceleration of the satellite in the theory of relativity. Overviews of treatment of relativistic effects on the GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou satellite systems are given. Keywords: satellite navigation, GNSS, post-Newton theory of relativity, relativistic effects, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou Relativistički utjecaji na satelitsku navigaciju Pregledni rad Osnovna znanja o relativističkim utjecajima na satelitsku navigaciju objašnjena su usporedbom glavnih karakteristika Newtonovog i relativističkog prostora vremena te kratkim uvodom u metriku gravitacijskog polja. Post-Newtonova teorija relativnosti objašnjena je kao osnova pri numeričkoj obradi relativističkih utjecaja u području satelitske navigacije. Vrijeme, kao vrlo važan parametar u relativističkoj satelitskoj navigaciji, objašnjeno je kroz koordinatno i vlastito vrijeme te kroz terestičko vrijeme i problem sinkronizacije satova.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments on the Speed of Light
    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2019, 7, 1240-1249 http://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp ISSN Online: 2327-4379 ISSN Print: 2327-4352 Experiments on the Speed of Light José R. Croca1,2, Rui Moreira1, Mário Gatta1,3, Paulo Castro1 1Center for Philosophy of Sciences of the University of Lisbon (CFCUL), Lisbon, Portugal 2Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal 3CINAV and Escola Naval (Portuguese Naval Academy), Lisbon, Portugal How to cite this paper: Croca, J.R., Mo- Abstract reira, R., Gatta, M. and Castro, P. (2019) Experiments on the Speed of Light. Journal Many experiments concerning the determination of the speed of light have of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 7, been proposed and done. Here two important experiments, Michel- 1240-1249. son-Morley and Sagnac, will be discussed. A linear moving variation of Mi- https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2019.75084 chelson-Morley and Sagnac devices will then be proposed for probing expe- Received: February 21, 2019 rimentally the invariance of the speed of light. Accepted: May 28, 2019 Published: May 31, 2019 Keywords Copyright © 2019 by author(s) and Speed of Light, Michelson-Morley Experiment, Sagnac Experiment, One-Arm Scientific Research Publishing Inc. Linear Moving Michelson-Morley and One-Beam Sagnac Interferometer This work is licensed under the Creative Variants Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access 1. Introduction Starting with Galileo, many experiments to study the speed of light have been proposed and done. One of the most famous, designed to study the existence of a hypothetical luminiferous aether, was undoubtedly the Michelson and Morley experiment [1].
    [Show full text]