2016 PHRF Certificate Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

PERFORMANCE HANDICAP RACING Office Use Only PHRF-NB FLEET OF NARRAGANSETT BAY P.O. Box 356, Washington, NC 27889 Phone (401) 253-0207 FAX (401) 369-9319 RATINGS 2016 PHRF-NB MEMBERSHIP/RATING CERTIFICATE Provisional Office Use Only This certificate expires on April 30, 2017, or upon change of ownership, whichever comes fi Rating A copy of this rating may be obtained by anyone for a handling fee of $4.00. ADMINISTRATIVE DATA External Mail Opt-Out Spinnaker Non-Spinnaker Name: Email: Street: Home Phone: Business: City: State: Zip: Yacht Name: Sail #: BOAT MEASUREMENTS Yacht Club: Designer: I: J: LOA: Model: Mfctr: P: E: LWL: Hull Serial #: Date Mfd.: ISP: SPL: Draft: Other Ratings: Date Last Rated: WSS: Beam: Headsail to be used Spinnakers to be used Fractional Masthead Disp: LP% Feet Headsail1 Spin # JC SMG Foot Luff Leech Rig Type: Keel Wt: Headsail2 Spin #1 Composite Rigging Keel Mat'l: Headsail3 Spin #2 Symmetric Spinnaker (s) Other Ballast: Headsail4 Spin #3 Asymmetric Spinnaker (s) Code 0 Asymmetric Spinnaker Tacked To: Roller Furling Credit Cruising Headsail Credit Articulating Pole at Mast Fixed Pole To Mast and Bow Check if there have been any new modifications If yes, a complete descripton must be provided in the Comments/Modifications secton or Bow Distance Fwd of Headstay: attached on a separate sheet. Retractable Bow Sprit Fixed Bow Sprit I certify the information contained in this application has been verified by me and is correct. Further, it is my responsibility to notify the PHRF committee of changes to this yacht which Articulating Bow Sprit affect measurements, handicap adjustments, or would alter it from a base boat as defined in the instructions. I agree to abide by the By-laws of PHRF-NB, and understand PHRF-NB VARIABLES does not evaluate, assess, or rate the sea-worthiness of my yacht, which is solely my responsibility. In addition, as a condition of, and in consideration for, issuing a rating, I as Engine Propeller Type Winged Keel owner and applicant, hereby agree to hold PHRF-NB, its directors, officers, and members free from any liability, economic or otherwise, resulting from any decisions and/or the assignment No Power # of Blades Centerboard of any rating it issues. Outboard Folding Rudder Owner/Master Signature/Date Inboard Feathering Keel Attached New Certificate $50.00 Renewal $30.00 Propeller Inst. Solid Prop Skeg Rudder Certificate Mod $15.00 Aperture Keel Spade Rudder Committee Use Only Exposed Shaft Fin Keel Outboard Rudder Base Rating Non-Spinnaker Adj Sail Drive Canting Keel Genoa Spin Adj Genoa Non Spin Adj Thru Keel Full Keel Mainsail Adjustment Furling Adjustment Comments/Modifications Prop. Adjustment Spin Pole Adjustment Mast Adjustment Misc. Adjustment Total Spin Adj Total Non Spin Adj Revision No: Date of Revision: Committee Signature/Date.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

ORC VPP Documentation 2019 5
World Leader in Rating Technology OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS ORC VPP Documentation 2019 5 2 Copyright c 2019 Offshore Racing Congress All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is only with the permission of the Offshore Racing Congress. CONTENTS 1 Background 13 2 Introduction 15 2.1 Scope . 15 2.2 Overview . 15 2.3 Layout . 15 3 VPP Methodology 17 3.1 Solution Method . 17 3.2 Boat Model . 18 3.2.1 Functional relationships . 19 3.3 Equations of Equilibrium . 21 3.3.1 Driving Force - Drag . 21 3.3.2 Heeling Moment - Rolling Moment . 22 3.4 Water Ballast and Canting Keel Yachts . 23 3.4.1 Canting Keel . 23 3.4.2 Daggerboard (Centreline lifting appendage) . 23 3.4.3 Daggerboard and Bilge boards . 23 3.4.4 Water ballast . 24 3.4.5 Measurement . 24 3.5 Dynamic Allowance (DA) . 24 3.5.1 Credits (2012) . 25 3.5.2 Calculation Procedure . 25 3.6 Non Manual Power . 25 4 Lines Processing Program 27 4.1 Hydrostatics . 27 4.2 LPP Output parameter deﬁnitions . 28 4.2.1 Measurement Trim . 28 4.2.2 Sailing Trim . 28 4.2.3 Second Moment Length (LSM) . 28 4.2.4 Appendage stripping . 28 4.2.5 Beam Depth Ratio (BTR) . 29 4.2.6 Maximum Effective Draft (MHSD) . 30 4.2.7 Bulb/Wing Effects . 31 4.3 Appendage wetted areas and lengths . 34 4.3.1 Conventional Fin keel and rudder . 34 4.3.2 Other appendages . 34 4.4 Righting Moment . 34 4.4.1 Righting Arm Curve .
[Show full text]
Boat Review: Elliott 50, Canting Keel
Boat review: Elliott 50, canting keel Out on the Ran Tan Going out on the Ran Tan is easy; like any racing yacht you step on to the wide, open transom and into the cockpit. But getting off the Elliott 50 is really tough – she’s just too much fun. ost of that enjoyment comes from the sense of being For our sea trial in the sunshine, I joined Doyle Sails’ directly in touch with the beast: the wind slides over Richard Bouzaid, Phil Houghton and Andy Pilcher; boatbuilder Mthe sails – the electronic speed log whizzes up like Greg Salthouse of Salthouse Boatbuilders in Greenhithe, who the bathroom scales on Christmas Day. The stiff, also built Sportivo; and Ran Tan II crew Ross Masters. light construction translates the boat’s every movement to I’d expected to be daunted by the hi-tech racer that attracts the crew; it’s pure sailing. rock star sailors but it just seemed so darn easy. The deck lay- Ran Tan II is the younger sister to Sportivo, featured in last out is similar to the Elliott 11m, Mrs Jones, [Boating April 2006]. month’s story on the Auckland to Fiji Race, by racing crew Wide clear sidedecks make it easy to move sails around. The Richard Bicknell of North Sails. Bicknell’s story describes ocean genoa cars are short and well inboard, for the 108% all-purpose racing on an Elliott 50 in more than 40 knots. However, Sportivo genoa and smaller headsails. The coachroof is relatively is publicity shy and so it fell to Ran Tan II, owned by uncluttered by control lines and, despite there being no labels, Wellingtonian John Meade, to face the media for a boat review.
[Show full text]
Current Trends in the Design of Sailing Yachts & the Competition of Racing
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS LABORATORY FOR SHIP AND MARINE HYDRODYNAMICS (Member ITTC, HELLAS LAB. ISO 9002 ) October 11, 2017 INNO BLUE GROWTH Team Marseille Conference 1 Current trends in the design of sailing yachts & The competition of racing sailing yachts by Gregory Grigoropoulos National Technical University of Athens October 11, 2017 INNO BLUE GROWTH Team Marseille Conference 2 Current trends in the design of sailing yachts New Designs - Cruise Boats New Mediterranean Designs emphasized on space on deck enjoy the sun full tables and platforms for swimming. In order to achieve that they have a full stern that give also more space on salon and cabins at stern. A second important factor for the design is depth of the keel, especially for the chartering boats, in order to enable mooring as close to the shore as possible and to ensure mooring in all marinas and ports, while retaining the necessary side force and stability. October 11, 2017 INNO BLUE GROWTH Team Marseille Conference 3 Current trends in the design of sailing yachts New Designs – Racing Yachts Open deck, full stern, very light construction and a deeper carbon keel with bulb and a rudder with carbon fibers. The new designs includes carbon masts and shrouds. The shrouds are pieces of standing rigging which hold the mast up from side to side. There are also canting keels designs and soon will be introduced foils. Canting keels is a form of sailing ballast, suspended from a rigid canting strut beneath the boat, which can be swung to windward of a boat under sail, in order to counteract the heeling force of the sail.
[Show full text]
ORC VPP Documentation 2016.Pdf
World Leader in Rating Technology OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS ORC VPP Documentation 2016 1 2 Copyright c 2016 Offshore Racing Congress All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is only with the permission of the Offshore Racing Congress. Cover picture: tank test tests at Wolfson Unit MTIA by courtesy Dobbs Davis CONTENTS 1 Background 13 2 Introduction 15 2.1 Scope . 15 2.2 Overview . 15 2.3 Layout . 15 3 VPP Methodology 17 3.1 Solution Method . 17 3.2 Boat Model . 18 3.2.1 Functional relationships . 19 3.3 Equations of Equilibrium . 20 3.3.1 Driving Force - Drag . 21 3.3.2 Heeling Moment - Rolling Moment . 22 3.4 Water Ballast and Canting Keel Yachts . 23 3.4.1 Canting Keel . 23 3.4.2 Daggerboard (Centreline lifting appendage) . 23 3.4.3 Bilge boards (lifting boards off centreline) . 23 3.4.4 Water ballast . 23 3.4.5 Measurement . 24 3.5 Dynamic Allowance (DA) . 24 3.5.1 Credits (2012) . 24 3.5.2 Calculation Procedure . 25 3.6 Non Manual Power . 26 4 Lines Processing Program 27 4.1 Hydrostatics . 27 4.2 LPP Output parameter deﬁnitions . 28 4.2.1 Measurement Trim . 28 4.2.2 Sailing Trim . 28 4.2.3 Second Moment Length (LSM) . 28 4.2.4 Appendage stripping . 28 4.2.5 Beam Depth Ratio (BTR) . 29 4.2.6 Maximum Effective Draft (MHSD) . 30 4.2.7 Bulb/Wing Effects . 31 4.3 Appendage wetted areas and lengths . 34 4.3.1 Conventional Fin keel and rudder .
[Show full text]
Rules for Classification and Construction I Ship Technology
Rules for Classification and Construction I Ship Technology 3 Special Craft 7 Guidelines for the Structural Design of Racing Yachts ≥ 24 m Edition 2012 The following Guidelines come into force on 1 December 2012. Germanischer Lloyd SE Head Office Brooktorkai 18, 20457 Hamburg, Germany Phone: +49 40 36149-0 Fax: +49 40 36149-200 [email protected] www.gl-group.com "General Terms and Conditions" of the respective latest edition will be applicable (see Rules for Classification and Construction, I - Ship Technology, Part 0 - Classification and Surveys). Reproduction by printing or photostatic means is only permissible with the consent of Germanischer Lloyd SE. Published by: Germanischer Lloyd SE, Hamburg I - Part 3 Table of Contents Chapter 7 GL 2012 Page 3 Table of Contents Section 1 General Requirements A. Application, Scope ..................................................................................................................... 1- 1 B. Documents for Approval ............................................................................................................ 1- 2 C. Definitions .................................................................................................................................. 1- 3 Section 2 Materials A. Fiber Reinforced Plastics, Sandwich Constructions and Bonding .............................................. 2- 1 B. Steel Alloys ................................................................................................................................ 2- 1 C. Aluminium Alloys
[Show full text]
Insights from the Load Monitoring Program for the 2014-2015 Volvo Ocean Race
THE 22 ND CHESAPEAKE SAILING YACHT SYMPOSIUM ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND, MARCH 2016 Insights from the Load Monitoring Program for the 2014-2015 Volvo Ocean Race Suzy Russell, Gurit Composite Components, UK Gaspar Vanhollebeke, Gurit Composite Components, UK Paolo Manganelli, Gurit Composite Components, France ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION This paper describes insights into keel and rigging loads For the first time in history, the 2014-2015 edition of the obtained through a data acquisition system fitted on the Volvo Ocean Race has been competed in with a fleet of fleet of Volvo 65 yachts during the 2014-2015 Volvo one- Ocean Race. In the first part, keel fin stress spectra are Marine, a specialist of high performance composite derived from traces of canting keel ram pressures and keel structures based in the United Kingdom, has coordinated angle; these are reviewed and compared against equivalent the work of a consortium of composite builders including spectra obtained by applying methods proposed by Det Decision S.A., Multiplast, and Persico S.P.A, while Farr Norske Veritas - Germanischer Llo Yacht Design (FYD) has been responsible for the design of guidelines and the ISO 12215 standard. The differences the yachts, including the composite structure engineering. between stress spectra and their validity are discussed, s engineering team has been engaged by Farr Yacht considering two types of keel: milled from a monolithic Design to provide finite element analysis (FEA) to support cast of steel, and fabricated from welded metal sheets. The the VO65 design. second part discusses predicted and actual rigging working Green Marine has also been responsible for assembling and loads for the Volvo 65 yachts, and considers how safety fitting out the VO65s and providing overall quality control factors vary between design loads proposed by DNVGL - and actual recorded loads.
[Show full text]
Navigating, Stacking, Surfing, Snacking, Surviving
Winning the Volvo Ocean Race 2005-2006 Photos by Jon Nash,AMRO ABN ©TEAM Navigating, Stacking, Surfing, Snacking, Surviving By Stan Honey, San Francisco Station in Gothenburg. There were inshore(above) short-course South races Pacific in sevensunset; of those stopover ports, complicating(below) the choice Maxine of boat andand sailLarry About the Volvo Ocean Race design and adding interest for spectators.(below) MaxineI was fortunate Larry to be The Volvo Ocean Race (VOR) is generally considered to be the asked by Mike Sanderson to navigate on ABN AMRO ONE. I was world championship of professional ocean racing. It is a fully- impressed with the caliber of the crew that Moose had attracted crewed around the world ocean race via the Southern Ocean. and was further impressed to learn that Moose had the time and From 1973 through 1998 it was known as the Whitbread. The VOR sufficient sponsorship from the ABN AMRO bank for a two-boat 2005-2006 comprised nine offshore legs starting in Vigo, Spain, program. While at 51 years of age I was a bit surprised to be then to Cape Town, Melbourne, Wellington, Rio de Janeiro, asked to navigate a Volvo Race, the skill of the team and profes- Baltimore, New York, Portsmouth, Rotterdam, and then finishing sionalism of the overall program were too good to miss, so I quit 14 my normal job and joined the team. By the end of the 18-month 7,300 square feet of sail, and have canting keels that were 14.5 program we had won six of the nine offshore legs and five of the feet deep.
[Show full text]
Sailing Comprises Wind Propulsion of a Craft by Means of Sails Or Other Airfoils and Steering It Over Water, Ice Or Land, Depending on the Type of Craft
Sailing - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sailing From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Sailing comprises wind propulsion of a craft by means of sails or other airfoils and steering it over water, ice or land, depending on the type of craft. A sailor manages the force of the wind on the sails by adjusting their angle with respect to the moving sailing craft and sometimes by adjusting the sail area. The force transmitted from the sails is resisted by forces from the hull, keel, and rudder of a sailing craft, by forces from skate runners for an iceboat, and by forces from wheels for a land sailing craft to allow steering a course on a point of sail with respect to the true wind. While there are still some places in the world where sail-powered passenger, fishing and trading vessels are used, these craft have become rarer as internal combustion engines have become economically viable in even the poorest and most remote areas. In most countries sailing is enjoyed as a recreational activity or as a sport. Recreational sailing or yachting can be divided into racing and cruising. Cruising can include extended offshore and ocean-crossing trips, coastal sailing within sight of land, and daysailing. Amante, a 1983 Peterson designed "Choate 48", sailing under a spinnaker off shore in Newport Beach, California, US 1History 2 Physics 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Sails as airfoils 2.3 Apparent wind 2.4 Effects of wind shear 3 Points of sail 3.1 Close Hauled or "Beating" 3.2 Reaching 3.3 Running 4 Basic sailing techniques 4.1 Trim 4.2 Tacking and gybing
[Show full text]
International Technical Committee Held on 3Rd -5Th November 2006 at the Marina Congress Center, Helsinki, Finland
OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS World Leader in Rating Technology Secretariat: UK Office: YCCS, 07020 Porto Cervo Five Gables, Witnesham Sardinia, Italy Ipswich, IP6 9HG England Tel: +39 0789 902 202 Tel: +44 1473 785 091 Fax: +39 0789 957 031 Fax: +44 1473 785 092 [email protected] [email protected] www.orc.org MINUTES of a meeting of the International Technical Committee held on 3rd -5th November 2006 at the Marina Congress Center, Helsinki, Finland. Present: Manolo Ruiz de Elvira (Chairman) Nicola Sironi (ORC Chief Measurer) Ken Weller (ORC Consultant) Davide Battistin (ITC Programmer) Friedrich Judel David Lyons Alessandro Nazareth Rob Pallard Fabio Fossati (Research Associate) Observers: Dan Nowlan, Offshore Director, US Sailing Peter Reichelsdorfer, US IMS Committee Chairman Jean Louis Conti, F.F.V. (France) Flemming Nielsen, Danish Sailing Minoru Tomita, ORCAN-Japan Masakazu Takagaki, ORCAN-Japan Enrique Molinelli, RFEV (Spain) Pablo Ferrer, RFEV (Spain) Marcel Wagenaar (Holland) Jussi Mannenberg, Finnish Sailing Federation Timo Sarainmaa, Finnish Sailing Federation Joakim Majander, Finnish Sailing Federation Karl-Johan Strahlmann, Finnish Sailing Federation Committee members Andy Claughton, Michael Richelsen, Jim Taylor and Philippe Pallu de la Barrière sent their regrets for being unable to attend. 1. Minutes of October 2006 Meeting Minutes of the previous meeting in Valencia, Spain were reviewed and approved with minor corrections. 2. Chief Measurer report As in the last ITC meeting, Chief Measurer Nicola Sironi reviewed the 2006 racing season. IMS has been used in many races at varying competition levels. No big problem emerged during the season, except for the case of some boats featuring an adjustable forestay on swept-back spreader rigs having also a backstay, and several #3 and #4 jibs that had to be trimmed at measurement checks because they had a small amount of jib roach.
[Show full text]
Offshore Racing Congress
World Leader in Rating Technology OFFSHORE RACING CONGRESS International Measure ment System IMS 2010 Copyright © 2010 Offshore Racing Congress. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part is only with the permission of the Offshore Racing Congress. Cover picture: ORCi Central European Championship, Cres 2009 by courtesy Andrea Carloni Deleted rules from 2009 version: Part H – Heavy Items Margin bars denote rule changes from 2009 version. IMS RULE O R C World leader in Rating Technology INTERNATIONAL MEASUREMENT SYSTEM IMS 2010 Offshore Racing Congress, Ltd. www.orc.org [email protected] 1 CONTENTS Part A – ADMINISTRATION Part G – SAILS IMS RULE A1 Language ........................................................... 3 G1 General ............................................................ 20 A2 Abbreviations and Definitions .......................... 3 G2 Mainsail ........................................................... 20 A3 Authorities ......................................................... 3 G3 Mizzen ............................................................. 20 A4 ISAF Rules ........................................................ 3 G4 Jib/Genoa (Including Inner jib) ....................... 20 A5 Rules Amendments ........................................ 4 G5 Mizzen Staysail ............................................... 21 A6 Rules Interpretations ......................................... 4 G6 Spinnakers ....................................................... 21 A7 Measurement ....................................................
[Show full text]
ORR Rulebook Provides Details About Measurement, Rule Restrictions, Ratings and the Requirements to Race Under ORR
2018 OFFSHORE RACING RULE (ORR™) A Handicap Rating System for Offshore Boats Published by the Offshore Racing Association www.offshoreraceracingrule.org ORR OWNER’S QUICK START GUIDE* (*The Quick Start Guide is meant to be used as a help guide for owners and for informational purposes only: it is not to be considered part of the ORR Rule Book). Brief The Offshore Racing Rule (ORR) is owned and administered by the Offshore Racing Association (ORA). The ORA is the Rule Authority. The ORR predicts relative time allowances between boats to permit boats of different sizes, types and ages to compete with the fairest ratings possible. The ORR is an objective rule. Its ratings are based on the measurement of the speed-related features of sailboats and on the use of the ORR Velocity Prediction Program (VPP) that then calculates the speed potential of each boat at any combination of wind speed and course direction by assessing the measured data. The ORR VPP is a set of algorithms developed through the latest specific fundamental scientific research for its ongoing development. ORR is intended to be a non-type forming measurement rule that fairly rates properly designed and prepared boats which are equipped for offshore racing. It must be clearly understood by all who use the ORR that it is not a development rule and therefore is not intended for sailors who are looking to “beat” the rule. In order to discourage attempts to design boats “to the rule”, the algorithms of the VPP are non-public and only limited access is allowed for trial certificates.
[Show full text]
Outcomes and Performance Criteria
NZQA Expiring unit standard 25345 version 3 Page 1 of 6 Title Demonstrate knowledge of terminology used in the marine industry Level 2 Credits 6 Purpose This unit standard is an introductory unit standard for people working or planning to work in the marine industry. People credited with this unit standard will be able to demonstrate knowledge of terminology associated with: the deck of a vessel; hull shape; vessel movement; appendages of a vessel; construction of a vessel; rig; interior of a vessel; moving, transportation and storing boats; painting a vessel; deterioration on a vessel; plumbing and engineering on a vessel; and the safety of life at sea. Classification Boating Industries > Boatbuilding Available grade Achieved Guidance Information 1 This unit standard is designed to complement Unit 9913, Demonstrate knowledge of the New Zealand marine and composite industry, and Unit 9917, Demonstrate knowledge of boat building methods. 2 Identification of fittings is covered by Unit 25343, Describe boat fittings and fastenings. Outcomes and performance criteria Outcome 1 Demonstrate knowledge of terminology associated with the deck of a vessel. Range port, starboard, bow, stern, coaming, painter, line, cockpit, centre cockpit, aft cockpit, companionway, cabin top, foredeck, side deck, flying bridge, clears, wheelhouse, bulwalk, skylight, capping, tiller, helm, extension tiller, passerelle, transom, davit, non skid, tender, chocks, dorade vent, anchor locker, camber, prism, gangplank, washboard, knee, gutter, spray dodger, solid dodger, bimini, coaming locker, rebate, border, toerail, scupper, bollard, caulking, walk through transom, instruments. Performance criteria 1.1 Deck related items/terms are identified using correct terminology. New Zealand Marine and Composites Industry © New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2020 Training Organisation SSB Code 101812 NZQA Expiring unit standard 25345 version 3 Page 2 of 6 1.2 Deck related items/terms are described in terms of their purpose, function or use.
[Show full text]