DOCSLIB.ORG

High Flyers 2017- Institute for Policy Studies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Flyers 2017- Institute for Policy Studies CO-AUTHORS: Chuck Collins directs the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies, where he also co-edits Inequality.org. His most recent book: Born on Third Base: A One Percenter Makes the Case for Tackling Inequality, Bringing Wealth Home, and Committing to the Common Good. Other reports and books by Collins include Reversing Inequality: Unleashing the Transformative Potential of An More Equal Economy and 99 to 1: How Wealth Inequality is Wrecking the World and What We Can Do About It. Collins co-founded the Patriotic Millionaires and United for a Fair Economy. Josh Hoxie directs the Project on Opportunity and Taxation at the Institute for Policy Studies and co-edits Inequality.org. He co-authored a number of reports on topics ranging from economic inequality, to the racial wealth divide, to philanthropy. Hoxie has written widely on income and wealth maldistribution for Inequality.org and other media outlets. He worked previously as a legislative aide for U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. Graphic Design: Kenneth Worles, Jr. Acknowledgements: We received significant assistance in the production of this report. We would like to thank our colleagues at IPS who helped us throughout the report development process, especially Jessicah Pierre and Sam Pizzigati. The Institute for Policy Studies (www.IPS-dc.org) is a multi-issue research center that has been conducting path-breaking research on inequality for more than 20 years. The IPS Inequality.org website (http://inequality.org/) provides an online portal into all things related to the income and wealth gaps that so divide us, in the United States and throughout the world. Subscribe to our weekly newsletter at Inequality.org or follow us on Twitter and Facebook: @inequalityorg Institute for Policy Studies -National Office 1301 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 www.ips-dc.org, Twitter: @IPS_DC Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/InstituteforPolicyStudies Institute for Policy Studies New England Office 30 Germania Street, Building L Jamaica Plain, MA. 02130 Email: [email protected] and [email protected] © 2017 Institute for Policy Studies 1 CONTENTS KEY FINDINGS 3 INTRODUCTION: TALE OF TWO FLYERS 4 PRIVATE JETS ARE ALREADY HEAVILY SUBSIDIZED 5 THE PRIVATE JET CARVE OUT IN THE TRUMP TAX CUTS 6 COMMERCIAL AIRLINE PASSENGERS FOOTING THE BILL 7 PRIVATE JET LOBBY FLEXING ITS MUSCLE 8 PRIVATE JETS THREATEN OUR SECURITY 9 MASKING OWNERSHIP OF PRIVATE AIRCRAFT 11 PRIVATE JETS, PUBLIC ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS 12 SOLUTIONS 13 CONCLUSION 14 2 KEY FINDINGS This report examines the ultimate excess in modern society, the private jet, including how they are publicly subsidized, the security threats they pose, and the detrimental environmental impact they present. This report follows the work of a report released by the Institute for Policy Studies in 2008 of the same title. Some major takeaways: • The private jet lobby spent $56 million lobbying over the past ten years to save more than $1 billion in annual taxes they avoid due to preferential tax treatment. • The tax cut package under consideration in the Senate maintains and expands the private jet tax carve-out, while the Republican budget plan increases fees on commercial airline passengers. • Private jets contribute less than one tenth of the resources they use from the Federal Aviation Administration Trust Fund. Commercial airline passengers heavily subsidize private jet passengers. • Commercial jets are taxed at up to 40 times the rate of private jets on the exact same route despite identical needs in terms of transportation infrastructure. • Private jets threaten our national security as owners can obscure their identity and passengers face zero security screening. • A single private jet trip burns more greenhouse gases than the average American does in a whole year. Solutions: • End the private jet tax carve-out and tax private jets at the same rate or higher than commercial air travelers. Don’t make it more expensive to fly commercial while subsidizing private jet travel. • Close the security loopholes in private jet travel and tax carbon emissions effectively to account for the environmental impact of private jets. 3 Introduction: Tale of Two Flyers Nothing symbolizes the growing concentration of wealth and power as much as the private luxury jet, flying high above the rest of us. The private jet lobby –and their super-wealthy passengers –have created a parallel universe of perks and privileges that would shock most commercial passengers if they knew about them. In both tax policy and homeland security, the high flyers have used their power to create one set of rules for themselves and another set of rules for the rest of us. As wealth has concentrated in the hands of a few, so has the demand for private jets. The Forbes 400, all of them high-flying billionaires, have more wealth combined than the bottom 64 percent of U.S. households combined.1 There are over 12,000 private luxury jets in the U.S. and industry analysts project that over the next decade over 9,000 new jets will be built, worth over $270 billion. These jets are owned and used by the wealthiest people on the planet. According to Wealth-X, the typical private jet owner is a 63 year-old male with a net worth of $1.6 billion.2 What It’s Like to Fly Private The plight of the ordinary U.S. commercial air traveler has become unquestionably grimmer over the last decade. The indignities of air travel include longer security lines, going shoeless and beltless through multiple security checks, evaporating legroom, lost baggage, and (if you’re lucky) stale peanuts or pretzels. In the last few years, commercial airlines have calibrated as to how much mistreatment customers can tolerate, in the form of shrinking seats and miscellaneous fees for every component of travel. Meanwhile, down at the general aviation center –where passengers board their private jets - the times have never been better. High flyers drive to small terminals, usually far away from the bustle of commercial passenger hubs. These terminals may be located at major airports, but have separate entrances and parking areas. Often, drivers are permitted to bring VIP passengers right up to the plane, where their unscreened luggage can be loaded directly into the cargo hold. Passengers greet their pilots and flight attendants and board the aircraft with their pocket knives and water bottles. Private flyers don’t have to bother with little plastic bags with three-ounce containers of shampoo or strangers rifling through their undergarments. No one dumps their personal items and water bottles into a trash bin or frisks their bodies. A weather delay doesn’t lead to compounding cancellations or passengers marooned for days. Flights might be pushed to a later window, but are rarely cancelled. 4 Waiting time? Instead of showing up 2 hours early, you only need to show up about 15 minutes before your private jet departure.3 Does this great inequality in flying experiences matter? After all, private jet flyers pay a steep premium for their privileges. Most people would love to avoid the hassle of commercial travel and bask in the luxury of private jet travel. But there are real costs to ordinary citizens and other travelers as a result of the growth in private jet travel. As this report shows, the rest of us pay to subsidize the private jet sector. And their lobbyists use their political clout to win tax breaks for the private jet set and fee increases for commercial travelers Private jet security is a joke –and the private jet lobby has worked to ensure that private jet passengers are not subject to any of the security scrutiny that regular commercial flyers must face. And the environmental costs of private jet travel are enormous. The carbon footprint per passenger of private jets is several times greater than flying on a commercial aircraft. Private Jets Are Already Heavily Subsidized Nothing reveals the power of the private jet lobby more than its ability to deliver the goods for its privileged customers, now in the form of privileged tax status. Private jets are already heavily subsidized and if the Senate passes the tax package currently under consideration those privileges will be further engrained in our tax code, at the expense of everyone else. To understand the private jet tax break under consideration in the Senate, one first has to grasp just how lopsided the tax structure is for private jets compared to commercial airline passengers. Private jets pay just a single tax, 21.8 cents per gallon of jet fuel or 19.3 cents per gallon for aviation gasoline. This fuel tax is higher than the fuel tax rate commercial airlines pay, but commercial flights more than make up for it with other taxes. Commercial airline passengers, by comparison, pay a 7.5 percent federal excise tax on tickets, a $5.60 federal security surcharge, a $4.10 Federal Flight Segment Tax, and $4.50 Passenger Facility Charge. And that’s just on flights in the continental United States. International flights are subject to an $18 in international arrival and departure tax while flights to Hawaii and Alaska are subject to a $9 tax. Also, if you happen to use frequent flyer airline miles to buy your ticket, you’ll pay a 7.5 percent tax on those miles.4 5 Some of these taxes, like the passenger facility charge and the segment tax, are on each leg of the flight meaning they’re charged multiple times on flights with layovers. All told, taxes make up more than 20 percent of the typical price a commercial airline traveler pays on their ticket.5 These are just the taxes and fees placed on passengers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Billionaire Bonanza 2017: the Forbes 400 and the Rest of Us
    CO-AUTHORS: Chuck Collins directs the Program on Inequality and the Common Good at the Institute for Policy Studies, where he also co-edits Inequality.org. His most recent book: Born on Third Base: A One Percenter Makes the Case for Tackling Inequality, Bringing Wealth Home, and Committing to the Common Good. Other reports and books by Collins include Reversing Inequality: Unleashing the Transformative Potential of An More Equal Economy and 99 to 1: How Wealth Inequality is Wrecking the World and What We Can Do About It. His 2004 book Wealth and Our Commonwealth, written with Bill Gates Sr., makes the case for taxing inherited fortunes, and his The Moral Measure of the Economy, written with Mary Wright, explores Christian ethics and economic life. Collins co-founded the Patriotic Millionaires and United for a Fair Economy. Josh Hoxie directs the Project on Opportunity and Taxation at the Institute for Policy Studies and co- edits Inequality.org. He co-authored a number of reports on topics ranging from economic inequality, to the racial wealth divide, to philanthropy. Hoxie has written widely on income and wealth maldistribution for Inequality.org and other media outlets. He worked previously as a legislative aide for U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders. Graphic Design: Kenneth Worles, Jr. Data Analyst: Amanda Page-Hoongrajok, University of Massachusetts Amherst. Acknowledgements: We received significant assistance in the production of this report. We would like to thank our colleagues at IPS who helped us throughout the report development process, especially Jessicah Pierre, Sam Pizzigati, and Sarah Anderson. The Institute for Policy Studies (www.IPS-dc.org) is a multi-issue research center that has been conducting path-breaking research on inequality for more than 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Americans for Tax Fairness Media Coverage of 2015 Efforts to Repeal the Estate Tax March 19, 2015 - May 29, 2015
    AMERICANS FOR TAX FAIRNESS MEDIA COVERAGE OF 2015 EFFORTS TO REPEAL THE ESTATE TAX MARCH 19, 2015 - MAY 29, 2015 Media clips included in this report were primarily generated by ATF activities and those of its coalition allies, in particular the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Institute for Policy Studies and Patriotic Millionaires. Some clips that cannot directly be attributed to our work are included to show the breadth and quality of coverage on the issue. EDITORIALS 6 Editorial: Needless giveaway: Now is not the time to expand the federal deficit -- The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (PA) 6 Editorial: Estate tax repeal / Not much help -- Press of Atlantic City (NJ) 6 Editorial: Keep the Estate Tax -- The Toledo Blade (OH) 7 Editorial: Keep the Estate Tax -- The Chicago Daily Chronicle (IL) 7 Editorial: Keep the Estate Tax -- The Cleveland News Herald (OH) 7 Editorial: Keep the Estate Tax -- The Cleveland Morning Journal (OH) 7 Editorial: Federal estate tax repeal an elitist scheme -- The Courier Post (NJ) 8 Editorial: Federal estate tax repeal an elitist scheme -- The Asbury Park Press (NJ) 8 Editorial: Federal estate tax repeal an elitist scheme -- The Daily Record (NJ) 8 Editorial: Repealing estate tax would reward 0.2%: Our view -- USA TODAY 8 Editorial: Repealing estate tax would reward 0.2%: Our view -- The Detroit Free Press (MI) 9 Editorial: Purchased politicians still betraying American principles -- The Daily Astorian (OR) 9 Editorial: A big tax break for billionaires, courtesy of the GOP -- The Los Angeles Times (CA) 9 Editorial:
    [Show full text]
  • Billionaire Bonanza, the Forbes 400 and the Rest of Us
    billionaire bonanza report: the forbes 4...and the rest of us december 2015 chuck collins josh hoxie CO-AUTHORS: Chuck Collins is a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies and directs the Institute’s Program on Inequality and the Common Good. An expert on U.S. inequality, Collins has authored several books, including 99 to 1: How Wealth Inequality is Wrecking the World and What We Can Do About It. His book Wealth and Our Commonwealth, written with Bill Gates Sr., makes the case for taxing inherited fortunes, and his The Moral Measure of the Economy, written with Mary Wright, explores Christian ethics and economic life. Collins co-founded the Patriotic Millionaires Josh Hoxie joined the Institute for Policy Studies in August 2014 and currently heads up the IPS Project on Opportunity and Taxation. He worked previously as a legislative aide for U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont, both in his office in Washington, D.C. and in Burlington. Josh attained a BA in political science and economics from St. Michael’s College in Colchester, Vermont. He has written widely on income and wealth maldistribution for Inequality.org and other media outlets. Graphic Design: Eric VanDreason. Acknowledgements: We received significant assistance in the production of this report. We would like to thank our colleagues at IPS who helped us throughout the report-development process: Sarah Anderson, Sam Pizzigati, Bob Lord, John Cavanagh, and Elaine de Leon. A special thanks to IPS associate fellow Salvatore Babones at the University of Sydney for his help on quantitative calculations. We also received guidance from Tom Shapiro and Tatjana Meschede at the Institute on Assets on Social Policy and insights on quantitative methods from Kaiti Tuthill, Kevin Baier, and Melissa Sands.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICANS for TAX FAIRNESS SELECTED NEWS STORIES and COMMENTARY May 1, 2014 – April 30, 2015
    AMERICANS FOR TAX FAIRNESS SELECTED NEWS STORIES AND COMMENTARY May 1, 2014 – April 30, 2015 Media clips included in this report were generated from activities sponsored by ATF, primarily at the national level, as funding for state groups ended in March 2014. A press clip is included that either in whole or in large part was generated by work by ATF and its communications consultants. Included are news stories, op-eds, editorials, opinion columns and blog posts. NATIONAL MEDIA 27 Blog: Opponents: Estate tax repeal would only benefit the wealthy -- FarmWorld.com 27 Column: The Death Tax Deception -- Bloomberg View 27 Column: Fix The Tax Code Friday: Should We Repeal The Federal Estate Tax? -- Forbes 27 How the government taxes rich dead people, explained -- Vox 28 Blog: Congress Might Repeal the Estate Tax, But Here's What They Could Do Instead -- Attn.com 28 In defense of Walmart: Why corporations shouldn't be responsible for preventing poverty -- The Week 29 Column: The Republican Recipe for Widening Inequality -- The New York Times 29 Op-Ed: House GOP Votes to Take Food From the Mouths of Hungry Children to Give Huge Tax Break to Children of Multi-Millionaires -- Really? -- Huffington Post 30 Blog: Walmart Heir Does Not Deserve Assets It Would Take a Worker a Million Years to Earn -- Truth-Out 30 Op-Ed: Ben & Jerry: We don't need this stupid tax cut -- USA TODAY 31 Op-Ed: Undermining the American dream -- The Hill 32 Editorial: Repealing estate tax would reward 0.2%: Our view -- USA TODAY 32 House Votes 240-179 To Repeal Estate Tax
    [Show full text]
  • Practicing Mutual Care: Tax Policy and the Common Good
    ALSO INSIDE Meet the Patriotic Millionaires THIRD QUARTER 2017 Page 10 Practicing Mutual Care Tax Policy and the Common Good CONTENTS 3 ENVISIONING Choosing Solidarity over Indifference Tax Justice Can Renew our National Community 5 LEAD STORY Supporting Tax Policies that Benefit Women and Families By Anna Chu and Jillian Edmonds 8 CATHOLIC SOCIAL JUSTICE Talking Faith and Taxes 9 CONGRESSIONAL VOICES Getting Tax Reform Right for Our Nation We Must Come Together as Economic Inequality Grows 10 OUR SPIRIT-FILLED NETWORK The Patriotic Millionaires Put the Common Good First America, We Can Do Better on Healthcare NETWORK Welcomes the Northern Virginia Advocates Team Educating Justice-Seekers One Presentation at a Time 14 CAPITOL VIEW American Health Care Act Passes the House, Federal Budget Decisions Approach THE NETWORK BOARD NEEDS YOU NETWORK is seeking three new Board members to join the NETWORK Lobby and NETWORK Advocates Boards in 2018 and we are inviting all of our members to participate wholeheartedly in a "name-raising" process to help identify potential candidates for these positions. Go to p. 11 to read more. STAY CONNECTED WITH US! www.facebook.com/NetworkLobby ON THE COVER Our country can only flourish if we provide for all members www.twitter.com/NetworkLobby of our national community. Photo credit: Jill Wellington Articles in NETWORK Connection may be reprinted. Please include the following on the reprints: “Reprinted by permission of NETWORK, advocates for justice inspired by Catholic sisters, www.networklobby.org.” Please send us a copy of the reprinted article. Third Quarter—Vol. 45, No. 3, NETWORK Connection ISSN 0199-5723.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Governance for Inequality and the Private Sector
    14 Economic Governance for Inequality and the Private Sector The outstanding faults of the economic society in which we live are its failure to provide for 1 full employment and its arbitrary and inequitable distribution of wealth and incomes. John Maynard Keynes Enabled by the technological revolution, the world economy has globalized. Yet despite an enormous increase in economic activity and world trade, and a significant reduction in poverty in some regions, inequality between and within countries has increased as economic returns go increasingly to capital rather than to labor, exacer- bating social tensions. Addressing this inequality has become a global priority and is the first economic governance challenge discussed in this chapter. We then review the need for international governance and regulation of the business sector in the common interest and raise some general issues about global governance of the economy. inequality One function of governance is to address issues of inequality, as extreme differences create tensions and destroy the social cohesion necessary for stability and security. Income gaps are widening in many countries, while aspirations are growing. Social inequalities lead to apathy, alienation, social unrest, violence and the erosion of trust 2 between individuals and the institutions of governance. Inequality can occur at multiple levels: between individuals, between communities or cultural groups, 1 This is the starting sentence in Keynes’s chapter 24 (“Concluding Notes on the Social Philosophy towards which the General Theory might Lead”), 1936, for the General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. 2 Bahá’í International Community. 2012. Beyond Balancing the Scales: The Roots of Equity, Justice and Prosperity for All, Bahá’í International Community’s contribution to the UN Global Thematic Consultation on “Addressing Inequalities,” New York, October 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Open Society Foundations
    Report to the Open Society Foundations From the New Venture Fund for the Americans for Tax Fairness Project (May 1, 2014 – April 30, 2015) Grant no. OR2014-12552 June 1, 2015 ORGANIZATION DESCRIPTION Americans for Tax Fairness (ATF) is a 501(c) (3) project of the New Venture Fund (NVF). The Open Society Foundations provided a support grant of $100,000 for our third year of operations, from May 1, 2014, through April 30, 2015. This is a report about the activities conducted by ATF during that time period. ATF is a coalition of 425 national and state endorsing organizations that runs a dynamic campaign, which includes coalition building, public education, polling and messaging research, national and state communications strategies, field organizing and coordination of research and production of policy and public education materials. The campaign had a staff of four during the grant period. ATF’s primary purpose is to educate the public about the need for comprehensive, progressive tax reform that results in greater federal revenue to meet the country’s growing needs. If the United States fails to raise sufficient tax revenues, we will face deep cuts to programs that are essential to what makes this country great and be unable to make the investments necessary to grow our economy and create good-paying jobs. ATF recognizes that federal tax reform happens in stages – sometimes there are opportunities to close loopholes and increase revenues; other times the focus is on preventing the loss of existing revenues through tax rate cuts and tax breaks that benefit the wealthy and corporations.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL MEDIA 29 Blog: Families Advance with Recent Tax Bill, but Corporations Got a Lot More -- Huffington Post 29 LTE: Avoiding U.S
    AMERICANS FOR TAX FAIRNESS SELECTED NEWS STORIES AND COMMENTARY January 1, 2015 -- January 15, 2016 Media clips included in this report were generated from activities sponsored by ATF. A media clip is included that either in whole or in large part was generated by ATF or its communications consultants. Included are news stories, op-eds, editorials, opinion columns and blog posts. Editorials and columns are included here when ATF is confident that it has directly influenced the media outlets or authors through editorial board memos and direct outreach. NATIONAL MEDIA 29 Blog: Families Advance with Recent Tax Bill, but Corporations Got a Lot More -- Huffington Post 29 LTE: Avoiding U.S. Corporate Taxes -- New York Times 29 Americans for Tax Fairness Report Cited by Conservative Talk Radio Host Mark Levin 30 Column: Christmas for Corporate Welfare -- USA Today 30 “Tax Extenders” Bill Swells Massively Under Lobbyist Onslaught -- The Intercept 31 Column: Sloan: Want to stop Corporate tax deserters? Start with this -- Washington Post 31 Column: The multinational tax muddle -- Washington Post 31 Op-ed: Congress can stop Pfizer from deserting America -- The Hill 32 Column: Tax avoidance is corporate America's way. So spare us Pfizer hypocrisy -- The Independent 32 Hillary Clinton criticizes Pfizer-Allergan merger -- Observer Leader 32 Blog: Bad Medicine: Pfizer's Offshore Tax Trick Just Latest of Many -- Huffington Post 32 Pfizer and Allergan in Talks to Make Saunders CEO in Merger -- Trade 12 33 Pfizer Allergan Merger -- Al Jazeera America 33
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Negotiating Power and Money in America
    All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America Paid for by the Patriotic Millionaires Available via eBook at Amazon.com RENEGOTIATING POWER AND MONEY IN AMERICA 2 BY ERICA PAYNE AND THE PATRIOTIC MILLIONAIRES With JOSH NANBERG, writer, and JULIE TENINBAUM, graphic designer RENEGOTIATING POWER AND MONEY IN AMERICA 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Patriotic Millionaires would like to extend a very special thank-you to Joe Zimlich, Amanda Crumley, and Justin Strekal, whose thoughtful counsel and commitment made this volume possible. The Patriotic Millionaires would also like to acknowledge the contributions of Erik Altieri, Wesley Brown, Kathryn DeSimone, Gene Haigh, and Mackenzie Slade. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ...........................5 Foreword ...................................7 The American Negotiation ...................13 The Term Sheet .............................16 Power ......................................17 Money .....................................33 Part I: Paying What Workers Earn .........37 Part II: Paying the Tab Reforming the Tax Code ....... 45 Conclusion .................................53 The Patriotic Millionaires Advisory Board .....55 RENEGOTIATING POWER AND MONEY IN AMERICA 5 FOREWORD Five years ago, a few dozen millionaires came together with a plan. They would use their power, influence, and access to lobby Congress and bend it to their will. It sounds like the same old depressing scenario, but this story has a twist. Rather than leaning on lawmakers to advance their personal financial interests, these “Patriotic Millionaires” were engaged in an exercise in civic virtue. They wanted to do what was right for the country—the whole country. They wanted to support the millions of Americans working hard to create a better future for themselves and their families. RENEGOTIATING POWER AND MONEY IN AMERICA 7 They came to Washington with a simple message and an earnest request: “PLEASE RAISE OUR TAXES.” Word spread quickly.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Political Penumbras of Taxes and War Powers for the 2012 Election (Do Not Delete)1/16/2013 1:00 Pm
    POLITICAL PENUMBRAS OF TAXES AND WAR POWERS FOR THE 2012 ELECTION (DO NOT DELETE)1/16/2013 1:00 PM POLITICAL PENUMBRAS OF TAXES AND WAR POWERS FOR THE 2012 ELECTION Robert Bejesky* I. INTRODUCTION This Article evaluates taxing and spending consequences and political dynamics of war power negotiations surrounding the invasion and occupation of Iraq as an issue for reflection in the 2012 presidential election. Nobel Laureate Shirin Ebadi remarked: Consider all the money spent and all the people killed in Afghanistan, yet still 60% of the country is in the hands of the Taliban. What was the result of the invasion of Iraq? The deaths of over one million civilians and the enrichment of two or three corporations. Why do you pay taxes when the money goes to waging wars?1 There are varying opinions regarding the success of operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. Likewise, civilian death toll estimates have ranged widely, presumably because an estimated 60,000 Iraqi refugees fled their homes monthly to escape adverse domestic conditions.2 Another study, published in the Lancet * M.A. Political Science (Michigan), M.A. Applied Economics (Michigan), LL.M. International Law (Georgetown). The author has taught international law courses for Cooley Law School and the Department of Political Science at the University of Michigan, American Government and Constitutional Law courses for Alma College, and business law courses at Central Michigan University and the University of Miami. I would like to express my gratitude to Amy Duncan, Rachel Sternleib, and the associate editors who worked on this article for their insightful suggestions, conscientious assistance, and thorough footnote work.
    [Show full text]