DOCSLIB.ORG

2017-25 Animal Welfare and Livestock Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017-25 Animal Welfare and Livestock Production Mapping farm animal welfare risks Case study on investments by Dutch pension funds in high risk companies in the chicken and pig meat value chain Fair Pension Label The Fair Pension Label is a coalition of the following organizations: Amnesty International, Milieudefensie, Oxfam Novib, PAX and World Animal Protection 29 August 2019 Research by: Kanchan Mishra and Ward Warmerdam (Profundo) Dirk Jan Verdonk, PhD (World Animal Protection) Page | 1 About this report This report has been commissioned by the Fair Pension Fund Label (Eerlijke Pensioen Label) which is a coalition of the following organisations: Amnesty International, Milieudefensie, Oxfam Novib, PAX, and World Animal Protection. The aim of the Fair Pension Label is to encourage the top ten largest pension funds in the Netherlands (based on the number of participants) to invest responsibly and encourage investee companies to conduct businesses responsibly using their financial leverage. This report, initiated by World Animal Protection, examines the financial relationships between chicken and pig meat producing and processing companies, retailers and restaurants and pension funds active in the Dutch market and calls upon pension funds to uphold certain minimum requirement for animal welfare in this industrial sector. About Profundo With profound research and advice, Profundo aims to make a practical contribution to a sustainable world and social justice. Quality comes first, aiming at the needs of our clients. Thematically we focus on commodity chains, the financial sector and corporate social responsibility. More information on Profundo can be found at www.profundo.nl. Authorship This report was researched and written by Kanchan Mishra (Profundo), Ward Warmerdam (Profundo), and Dirk Jan Verdonk (World Animal Protection). Correct citation of this document: Mishra, K., W. Warmerdam and D.J. Verdonk (2019), Mapping farm animal welfare risks - Case study on investments by Dutch pension funds in high risk companies in the chicken and pig meat value chain, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Profundo. Disclaimer Profundo observes the greatest possible care in using information and drafting publications but cannot guarantee that this report is complete and assumes no responsibility for errors in the sources used. The report is provided for informational purposes and is not to be read as providing endorsements, representations or warranties of any kind whatsoever. Opinions and information provided are made as of the date of the report issue and are subject to change without notice. Profundo will not accept any liability for damage arising from the use of this publication. Page | 2 Table of contents Samenvatting............. ................................................................................. 5 Summary……………… ..................................................................................... 8 Introduction………. ..................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1 Animal welfare and industrial livestock production ....... 12 1.1 Animal welfare in industrial livestock production .................................................. 12 1.2 Animal welfare in industrial broiler farming ............................................................. 14 1.2.1 Chicken sentience ............................................................................................................... 14 1.2.2 Welfare violations ............................................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Mitigation measures .......................................................................................................... 15 1.3 Animal welfare in industrial pig farming .................................................................... 16 1.3.1 Pig sentience ......................................................................................................................... 16 1.3.2 Welfare violations ............................................................................................................... 16 1.3.3 Mitigation measures .......................................................................................................... 18 Chapter 2 Financial relationships ........................................................ 19 2.1 General findings .................................................................................................................. 19 2.2 Algemeen Burgerlijk Pensioenfonds (ABP)................................................................ 26 2.2.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 26 2.2.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 27 2.3 Bedrijfstakpensioenfonds voor de Bouwnijverheid (BpfBOUW) ....................... 28 2.3.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 28 2.3.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 29 2.4 BPL Pensioen ......................................................................................................................... 31 2.4.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 31 2.4.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 32 2.5 Pensioenfonds Detailhandel ........................................................................................... 33 2.5.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 33 2.5.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 34 2.6 Pensioenfonds Horeca & Catering (PH&C) ............................................................... 34 2.6.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 34 2.6.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 36 2.7 Pensioenfonds Vervoer ..................................................................................................... 37 2.7.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 37 2.7.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 38 2.8 Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW) ..................................................................... 39 2.8.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Page | 3 2.8.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 40 2.9 Pensioenfonds van de Metalektro (PME) ................................................................... 41 2.9.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 41 2.9.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 42 2.10 Pensioenfonds Metaal en Techniek (PMT) ................................................................ 44 2.10.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 44 2.10.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 45 2.11 Stichting Pensioenfonds voor Personeelsdiensten (StiPP) .................................. 46 2.11.1 Profile ....................................................................................................................................... 46 2.11.2 Financial relationships ....................................................................................................... 47 Chapter 3 Analysis of international standards and initiatives on farm animal welfare ..................................................................... 49 3.1 Legislation .............................................................................................................................. 50 3.2 Multilateral instruments ................................................................................................... 52 3.2.1 OIE standards........................................................................................................................ 52 3.2.2 OECD guidance .................................................................................................................... 52 3.3 Voluntary standards ........................................................................................................... 53 3.3.1 Beter Leven (Better Life) ................................................................................................... 54 3.3.2 New Standard Chicken .....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Companion Animals
    HANDBOOK FOR NGO SUCCESS WITH A FOCUS ON ANIMAL ADVOCACY by Janice Cox This handbook was commissioned by the World Society for the Protection of Animals (now World Animal Protection) when the organization was still built around member societies. 1 PART 1 Animal Protection Issues Chapter 1 Companion Animals Chapter 2 Farm Animals Chapter 3 Wildlife Chapter 4 Working Animals Chapter 5 Animals in Entertainment Chapter 6 Animal Experimentation ̇ main contents Companion animals are common throughout the world and in many countries are revered for their positive effect on the physical and mental health of their human owners. 1 CHAPTER 1 CHAPTER 1 COMPANION ANIMALS ■ COMPANION ANIMALS COMPANION CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Background to Stray Animal Issues a) What is a ‘Stray’? b) Why are Strays a Problem? c) Where Do Strays Come From? 3. Stray Animal Control Strategies a) Addressing the Source of Stray Animals b) Reducing the Carrying Capacity c) Ways of Dealing with an Existing Stray Population 4. Companion Animal Veterinary Clinics 5. Case Studies a) RSPCA, UK b) SPCA Selangor c) Cat Cafés 6. Questions & Answers 7. Further Resources ̇ part 1 contents 1 1 INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 Companion animals (restricted to cats and dogs for the purposes of this manual) are common throughout the world and in many countries are revered for their positive effect on the physical and mental health of their human owners. Companion animals are also used for work, such as hunting, herding, searching and guarding. The relationship between dogs and humans dates back at least 14,000 years ago with ■ the domestic dog ancestor the wolf.
    [Show full text]
  • Pig Towers and in Vitro Meat
    Social Studies of Science http://sss.sagepub.com/ Pig towers and in vitro meat: Disclosing moral worlds by design Clemens Driessen and Michiel Korthals Social Studies of Science 2012 42: 797 originally published online 12 September 2012 DOI: 10.1177/0306312712457110 The online version of this article can be found at: http://sss.sagepub.com/content/42/6/797 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for Social Studies of Science can be found at: Email Alerts: http://sss.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://sss.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://sss.sagepub.com/content/42/6/797.refs.html >> Version of Record - Nov 12, 2012 OnlineFirst Version of Record - Sep 12, 2012 What is This? Downloaded from sss.sagepub.com at Vienna University Library on July 15, 2014 SSS42610.1177/0306312712457110Social Studies of ScienceDriessen and Korthals 4571102012 Article Social Studies of Science 42(6) 797 –820 Pig towers and in vitro meat: © The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permission: sagepub. Disclosing moral worlds by co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0306312712457110 design sss.sagepub.com Clemens Driessen Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands Applied Philosophy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands Michiel Korthals Applied Philosophy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands Abstract Technology development is often considered to obfuscate democratic decision-making and is met with ethical suspicion. However, new technologies also can open up issues for societal debate and generate fresh moral engagements. This paper discusses two technological projects: schemes for pig farming in high-rise agro-production parks that came to be known as ‘pig towers’, and efforts to develop techniques for producing meat without animals by using stem cells, labelled ‘in vitro meat’.
    [Show full text]
  • An Industrial Internet Platform for Massive Pig Farming (IIP4MPF)
    Journal of Computer and Communications, 2020, 8, 181-196 https://www.scirp.org/journal/jcc ISSN Online: 2327-5227 ISSN Print: 2327-5219 An Industrial Internet Platform for Massive Pig Farming (IIP4MPF) Mu Gu1,2, Baocun Hou1, Jiehan Zhou3, Kai Cao1, Xiaoshuang Chen1*, Congcong Duan1 1Beijing Aerospace Smart Manufacturing Technology Development Co., Ltd., Beijing, China 2School of Mechatronics Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China 3Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland How to cite this paper: Gu, M., Hou, B.C., Abstract Zhou, J.H., Cao, K., Chen, X.S. and Duan, C.C. (2020) An Industrial Internet Platform Pig farming is becoming a key industry of China’s rural economy in recent for Massive Pig Farming (IIP4MPF). Jour- years. The current pig farming is still relatively manual, lack of latest Infor- nal of Computer and Communications, 8, mation and Communication Technology (ICT) and scientific management 181-196. https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2020.812017 methods. This paper proposes an industrial internet platform for massive pig farming, namely, IIP4MPF, which aims to leverage intelligent pig breeding, Received: October 14, 2020 production rate and labor productivity with the use of artificial intelligence, Accepted: December 27, 2020 the Internet of Things, and big data intelligence. We conducted requirement Published: December 30, 2020 analysis for IIP4MPF using software engineering methods, designed the Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and IIP4MPF system for an integrated solution to digital, interconnected, intelli- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. gent pig farming. The practice demonstrates that the IIP4MPF platform sig- This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International nificantly improves pig farming industry in pig breeding and productivity.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing the Fecal Shedding of Swine Infected with Japanese Encephalitis Virus
    Characterizing the fecal shedding of swine infected with Japanese encephalitis virus by Konner Cool B.S., Kansas State University, 2017 A REPORT submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology College of Veterinary Medicine KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2020 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Dana Vanlandingham Copyright © Konner Cool 2020. Abstract Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is an enveloped, single-stranded, positive sense Flavivirus with five circulating genotypes (GI to GV). JEV has a well described enzootic cycle in endemic regions between swine and avian populations as amplification hosts and Culex species mosquitoes which act as the primary vector. Humans are incidental hosts with no known contributions to sustaining transmission cycles in nature. Vector-free routes of JEV transmission have been described through oronasal shedding of viruses among infected swine. The aim of this study was to characterize the fecal shedding of JEV from intradermally challenged swine. The objective of the study was to advance our understanding of how JEV transmission can be maintained in the absence of arthropod vectors. Our hypothesis is that JEV RNA will be detected in fecal swabs and resemble the shedding profile observed in swine oral fluids, peaking between days three and five. In this study fecal swabs were collected throughout a 28-day JEV challenge experiment in swine and samples were analyzed using reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Quantification of viral loads in fecal shedding will provide a more complete understanding of the potential host-host transmission in susceptible swine populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Seven: the Meat Industry
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by De Montfort University Open Research Archive Journal for Critical Animal Studies, Volume VI, Issue 1, 2008 ‘Most farmers prefer Blondes’: The Dynamics of Anthroparchy in Animals’ Becoming Meat Erika Cudworth1 My visit to the Royal Smithfield Show, one of the largest events in the British farming calendar, reminded me of the gendering of agricultural animals. Upon encountering one particular stand in which there were three pale honey coloured cows (with little room for themselves), some straw, a bucket of water, and Paul, a farmer’s assistant. Two cows were lying down whilst the one in the middle stood and shuffled. Each cow sported a chain around her neck with her name on it. The one in the middle was named ‘Erica.’ Above the stand was a banner that read, ‘Most farmers prefer Blondes,’ a reference to the name given to this particular breed, the Blonde D’Aquitaine. The following conversation took place: Erika: What’s special about this breed? Why should farmers prefer them? Paul: Oh, they’re easy to handle, docile really, they don’t get the hump and decide to do their own thing. They also look nice, quite a nice shape, well proportioned. The colour’s attractive too. E: What do you have to do while you’re here? P: Make sure they look alright really. Clear up after ‘em, wash ‘n brush ‘em. Make sure that one (he pokes ‘Erica’) don’t kick anyone. E: I thought you said they were docile. P: They are normally.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Production, Husbandry and Sustainability of Free-Range Pig Production Systems
    1615 Review of Production, Husbandry and Sustainability of Free-range Pig Production Systems Z. H. Miao*, P. C. Glatz and Y. J. Ru Livestock Systems, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy South Australia, Australia 5371 ABSTRACT : A review was undertaken to obtain information on the sustainability of pig free-range production systems including the management, performance and health of pigs in the system. Modern outdoor rearing systems requires simple portable and flexible housing with low cost fencing. Local pig breeds and outdoor-adapted breeds for certain environment are generally more suitable for free-range systems. Free-range farms should be located in a low rainfall area and paddocks should be relatively flat, with light topsoil overlying free-draining subsoil with the absence of sharp stones that can cause foot damage. Huts or shelters are crucial for protecting pigs from direct sun burn and heat stress, especially when shade from trees and other facilities is not available. Pigs commonly graze on strip pastures and are rotated between paddocks. The zones of thermal comfort for the sow and piglet differ markedly; between 12-22°C for the sow and 30-37°C for piglets. Offering wallows for free-range pigs meets their behavioural requirements, and also overcomes the effects of high ambient temperatures on feed intake. Pigs can increase their evaporative heat loss via an increase in the proportion of wet skin by using a wallow, or through water drips and spray. Mud from wallows can also coat the skin of pigs, preventing sunburn. Under grazing conditions, it is difficult to control the fibre intake of pigs although a high energy, low fibre diet can be used.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 14, Issue 45 - 12 November 2009
    Volume 14, Issue 45 - 12 November 2009 Editorials Antibiotic resistance in Europe: the challenges ahead 2 by ECDC Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections Programme Rapid communications Experience of European intensive care physicians with infections due to antibiotic-resistant bacteria, 2009 4 by A Lepape, DL Monnet, on behalf of participating members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) Decrease of hypervirulent Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 027 in the Netherlands 7 by MP Hensgens, A Goorhuis, DW Notermans, BH van Benthem, EJ Kuijper A simple mathematical approach to deciding the dosage of vaccine against pandemic H1N1 influenza 10 by H Nishiura, K Iwata Pandemic influenza A(H1N1)v: Human to pig transmission in Norway? 15 by M Hofshagen, B Gjerset, C Er, A Tarpai, E Brun, B Dannevig, T Bruheim, IG Fostad, B Iversen, O Hungnes, B Lium Assessing the impact of the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic on reporting of other threats through the Early Warning and Response System 18 by A Cox, P Guglielmetti, D Coulombier Botulism and hot-smoked whitefish: a family cluster of type E botulism in France, September 2009 21 by LA King, T Niskanen, M Junnikkala, E Moilanen, M Lindström, H Korkeala, T Korhonen, M Popoff, C Mazuet, H Callon, N Pihier, F Peloux, C Ichai, H Quintard, P Dellamonica, E Cua, M Lasfargue, F Pierre, H de Valk First report of a North American invasive mosquito species Ochlerotatus atropalpus (Coquillett) in the Netherlands, 2009 24 by EJ Scholte, W Den Hartog, M Braks, C Reusken, M Dik, A Hessels Surveillance and outbreak reports Clostridium difficile ribotypes 001, 017, and 027 are associated with lethal C.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Performance, Management Practices and Challenges to Intensive Pig Farming in Peri-Urban Kampala, Uganda
    Vol. 6(1), pp 1-7 January 2015 DOI: 10.5897/IJLP2014.0223 Article Number: A91374249996 ISSN 2141-2448 International Journal of Livestock Copyright ©2015 Production Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/IJLP Full Length Research Paper Analysis of performance, management practices and challenges to intensive pig farming in peri-urban Kampala, Uganda Okello, Emmanuel1,2,3, Amonya, Collins3,4, Okwee-Acai, James3, Erume, Joseph3 and De Greve, Henri1,2* 1Structural and Molecular Microbiology, Structural Biology Research Center, VIB, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. 2Structural Biology Brussels, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium. 3College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Bio-security, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. 4National Agricultural Advisory Services, Tororo District, P. O. Box 25235, Kampala, Uganda. Received 11 August, 2014; Accepted 12 January, 2015 Uganda is currently among the largest per capita consumers of pork in sub Saharan Africa. Most of this pork is consumed in “pork joints” in Kampala and other major urban centers in the country. However, the current productivity is low and cannot meet the soaring demand for pork. No information was previously available on the performance productivity of intensive piggeries in Uganda. This study was aimed at assessing the performance, factors affecting productivity and challenges to intensive pig farming in peri-urban Kampala. Production parameters were captured from purposively selected 332 sows and 521 grower pigs. Information on management practices, challenges and prospects of the industry was gathered through questionnaires administered to farmers, key informant interviews and stakeholder’s focus group discussions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Porcine Nasal Microbiota with Particular Attention to Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in Germany—A Culturomic Approach
    microorganisms Article The Porcine Nasal Microbiota with Particular Attention to Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Germany—A Culturomic Approach Andreas Schlattmann 1, Knut von Lützau 1, Ursula Kaspar 1,2 and Karsten Becker 1,3,* 1 Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany; [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (K.v.L.); [email protected] (U.K.) 2 Landeszentrum Gesundheit Nordrhein-Westfalen, Fachgruppe Infektiologie und Hygiene, 44801 Bochum, Germany 3 Friedrich Loeffler-Institute of Medical Microbiology, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-3834-86-5560 Received: 17 March 2020; Accepted: 2 April 2020; Published: 4 April 2020 Abstract: Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) remains a serious public health threat. Porcine nasal cavities are predominant habitats of LA-MRSA. Hence, components of their microbiota might be of interest as putative antagonistically acting competitors. Here, an extensive culturomics approach has been applied including 27 healthy pigs from seven different farms; five were treated with antibiotics prior to sampling. Overall, 314 different species with standing in nomenclature and 51 isolates representing novel bacterial taxa were detected. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from pigs on all seven farms sampled, comprising ten different spa types with t899 (n = 15, 29.4%) and t337 (n = 10, 19.6%) being most frequently isolated. Twenty-six MRSA (mostly t899) were detected on five out of the seven farms. Positive correlations between MRSA colonization and age and colonization with Streptococcus hyovaginalis, and a negative correlation between colonization with MRSA and Citrobacter spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Agribusiness and Society Corporate Responses to Environmentalism, Market Opportunities and Public Regulation
    Critical praise for this book This book fills a void, as it analyses, by means of original case studies, how the major agribusiness corporations respond to challenges posed by new regulation, environmental pressure, and market opportunities. Overall, it shows how corporate R&D and innovation is more driven by internal organiza- tional imperatives (in particular profits and efficiency gains) rather than by societal and environmental concerns, consumer preferences, or competitors. Innovation and learning clearly appear to be a bottom-up (farm-level, SMEs), and not a top- down (corporate strategy) process. This excellent book is thus of value both to managers and activists. A must for anyone concerned with the future of corporate agriculture. Matthias Finger, Professor and Dean, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology One of the most pressing debates today in world agricultural policy relates to how we should consider corporate engage- ment with the environment. This book is a milestone in the analysis of this critical issue. Society needs to confront and resolve the issues presented in this book, which should be read by anyone with an interest in the environmental implications of our food system. Dr Bill Pritchard, Senior Lecturer in Economic Geography, University of Sydney, Australia kees jansen & sietze vellema | editors Agribusiness and Society Corporate responses to environmentalism, market opportunities and public regulation Z Zed Books london · new york Agribusiness and Society: Corporate responses to environmentalism, market opportunities and public regulation was first published by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London n1 9jf, uk and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, ny 10010, usa in 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 6-2016 Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement Elan L. Abrell Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1345 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] SAVING ANIMALS: EVERYDAY PRACTICES OF CARE AND RESCUE IN THE US ANIMAL SANCTUARY MOVEMENT by ELAN LOUIS ABRELL A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2016 © 2016 ELAN LOUIS ABRELL All Rights Reserved ii Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Anthropology in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Jeff Maskovsky Chair of Examining Committee _________________________ _________________________________________ Date Gerald Creed Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Katherine Verdery Melissa Checker THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Saving Animals: Everyday Practices of Care and Rescue in the US Animal Sanctuary Movement by Elan Louis Abrell Advisor: Jeff Maskovsky This multi-sited ethnography of the US animal sanctuary movement is based on 24 months of research at a range of animal rescue facilities, including a companion animal shelter in Texas, exotic animal sanctuaries in Florida and Hawaii, and a farm animal sanctuary in New York.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Animal Welfare Directives in the EU EU-27
    THIS REPORT CONTAINS ASSESSMENTS OF COMMODITY AND TRADE ISSUES MADE BY USDA STAFF AND NOT NECESSARILY STATEMENTS OF OFFICIAL U.S. GOVERNMENT POLICY Voluntary - Public Date: 7/14/2011 GAIN Report Number: E60042 EU-27 Post: Brussels USEU Implementation of Animal Welfare Directives in the EU Report Categories: Livestock and Products Poultry and Products Approved By: Maurice House Prepared By: Yvan Polet Report Highlights: Several European Animal Welfare Directives for the protection of broilers, laying hens and pigs are reaching their final implementation dates in 2010, 2012 and 2013, respectively. These directives have been transposed into EU Member State (MS) legislation with minor allowed deviations. EU MS will also be responsible for their enforcement, with verification through enforcement audits by the EU‘s Food and Veterinary Office. This report provides a state of play of this AW legislation, as well as on its impact on EU animal production and economics. General Information: Executive summary Animal welfare (AW) has been anchored in the European Treaties. Some EU animal welfare legislation, such as AW at slaughter, goes back to 1974. The groundwork for animal welfare in the EU was anchored in the 1978 European Convention for the protection of animals kept for farming purposes. However, AW became a prominent politically sensitive matter in the 1990‘s and species specific, as well as non-species specific AW legislation was introduced over time. AW legislation for several specific animal species is reaching its final implementation date in the current years. The final implementation date for the EU directive for the protection of broilers was July 1, 2010; the final date for the EU directive for the protection of laying hens is January 1, 2012, while the final date for the EU directive for the protection of pigs is January 1, 2013.
    [Show full text]