Penyata Rasmi Parlimen Parliamentary Debates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Thesis
This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The making of a gay Muslim: social constructions of religion, sexuality and identity in Malaysia and Britain Mohd Sidik, Shanon Shah Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 THE MAKING OF A GAY MUSLIM: SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS OF RELIGION, SEXUALITY AND IDENTITY IN MALAYSIA AND BRITAIN Shanon Shah Mohd Sidik PhD in the Sociology of Religion 1 Abstract This study challenges many popular views and some academic perspectives on the role of Islam and gay sexuality in personal identity construction. -
Dilemmas of Opposition: Building Parties and Coalitions in Authoritarian Regimes
DILEMMAS OF OPPOSITION: BUILDING PARTIES AND COALITIONS IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sebastian Carl Dettman December 2018 © 2018 Sebastian Carl Dettman DILEMMAS OF OPPOSITION: BUILDING PARTIES AND COALITIONS IN AUTHORITARIAN REGIMES Sebastian Carl Dettman, Ph. D. Cornell University 2018 Approximately one third of the world’s states are competitive authoritarian regimes, where opposition parties compete against powerful incumbents that skew political and electoral institutions to their advantage. A key challenge for opposition parties in such regimes is to expand their electoral support and work with other opposition actors to win greater power. Under what conditions are they successful in building broad-based and coordinated challenges to authoritarian rulers? This dissertation argues that opposition success hinges on their strategic choices in elections and in office – and how they navigate key tradeoffs and dilemmas of expansion. Individual opposition parties face diverging incentives and costs to expand based on the identities and issues around which they initially build support. At the collective level, opposition parties often seek to coordinate their electoral challenges against the incumbent to build broader power. But when opposition parties work together, they face strong pressure to stick with their existing niche identities, since pursuing strategies of party broadening – changes to party image to appeal to new constituencies – risks encroaching on the electoral terrain and core constituencies of their coalition partners. As a result, parties frequently struggle to navigate conflicting incentives of individual and collective electoral strategies to win power. -
Framing by Chinese Newspapers
IJAPS, Vol. 9, No. 2 (July 2013) COVERING GALAS AND BATU SAPI BY-ELECTIONS: FRAMING BY CHINESE NEWSPAPERS Md. Sidin Ahmad Ishak* Universiti Malaya, Malaysia email: [email protected] Yang Lai Fong** Taylor's University Malaysia, Malaysia email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In this article, the authors report the outcome of a thorough analysis of how Malaysian Chinese newspapers—Sin Chew Daily and Nanyang Siang Pau— reported the two last Malaysian by-elections in 2010, which are the Galas and Batu Sapi by-elections. These two by-elections were important because their results were considered as significant indications of the people's confidence in the ruling coalition and the Prime Minister Najib's promises to reform since the political tsunami in 2008. The outcomes of these two by-elections were also seemed as indications of the people's voting pattern for the upcoming 13th Malaysian general election, which must be held by 2013. The newspapers were analysed with the objectives of determining: (1) the pattern of coverage; (2) the predominant news sources used by the newspapers; (3) the news frame used by the newspapers; and (4) the slant of the news articles. Findings show that both of the newspapers devoted a huge percentage of its attention to getting straight news stories from Barisan Nasional leaders, while episodic frame made the strongest showing on the * Md. Sidin Ahmad Ishak is a professor at the Department of Media Studies, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. He is currently the Deputy Dean of Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences at the same university. -
'Selling Race and God During GE13: a Discourse- Historical Analysis Of
‘Selling Race and God during GE13: A Discourse- historical Analysis of Editorials and Columns in Mainstream Malay and English-language newspapers during the 13th General Election in Malaysia’ by Siti Nurnadilla Mohamad Jamil A Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University April 2018 ©Siti Nurnadilla Mohamad Jamil, 2018 Abstract This thesis conducts a critical analysis of editorials and columns in mainstream newspapers during Malaysia’s 13th General Election (GE13) campaign. In a country that practises parliamentary democracy but simultaneously observes a ‘close cooperation’ (Mustafa, 2010, p. 51) between the ruling party and the mainstream press, this study explores the links between the two. The thesis demonstrates the continuing power of the mainstream press in the country. It also explores how a so-called parliamentary democracy can lead to authoritarian rule, as well as the role of the press in this process. Adhering to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) principles, the thesis describes and explains how particular relations of power are enacted, reproduced and legitimized within government-owned media, in this case Malaysia where control is institutionalized. This study specifically focuses on the discursive strategies of legitimation in editorials and columns, and how they present particular narratives or arguments in the interests of the powerful. The thesis offers a greater understanding of the deep ideological structures of mainstream newspapers and, in particular, their construction and (de)legitimisation of the government and opposition during the GE13 campaign. This investigation draws on various methods, from quantitative content analysis to the Discourse-historical Approach (DHA), and insights from a range of disciplines, to examine the discursive features of mainstream newspapers’ discourse during the GE13 campaign.