DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical Time and Physical Space in General Relativity Richard J

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical Time and Physical Space in General Relativity Richard J Physical time and physical space in general relativity Richard J. Cook Department of Physics, U.S. Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80840 ͑Received 13 February 2003; accepted 18 July 2003͒ This paper comments on the physical meaning of the line element in general relativity. We emphasize that, generally speaking, physical spatial and temporal coordinates ͑those with direct metrical significance͒ exist only in the immediate neighborhood of a given observer, and that the physical coordinates in different reference frames are related by Lorentz transformations ͑as in special relativity͒ even though those frames are accelerating or exist in strong gravitational fields. ͓DOI: 10.1119/1.1607338͔ ‘‘Now it came to me:...the independence of the this case, the distance between FOs changes with time even gravitational acceleration from the nature of the though each FO is ‘‘at rest’’ (r,␪,␾ϭconstant) in these co- falling substance, may be expressed as follows: ordinates. In a gravitational field (of small spatial exten- sion) things behave as they do in space free of III. PHYSICAL SPACE gravitation,... This happened in 1908. Why were another seven years required for the construction What is the distance dᐉ between neighboring FOs sepa- of the general theory of relativity? The main rea- rated by coordinate displacement dxi when the line element son lies in the fact that it is not so easy to free has the general form oneself from the idea that coordinates must have 2 ␣ ␤ an immediate metrical meaning.’’ 1 Albert Ein- ds ϭg␣␤ dx dx ? ͑1͒ stein Einstein’s answer is simple.3 Let a light ͑or radar͒ pulse be transmitted from the first FO ͑observer A) to the second FO I. INTRODUCTION ͑observer B) where it is reflected and returns to A. If the time between transmission and reception of the reflected I often start my lecture on the meaning of the line element ͑ ͒ ␶ in general relativity ͑GR͒ with the provocative statement, pulse as measured by A’s standard clock is d A , then the ‘‘In general relativity the Galilean transformation of classical Einstein distance between A and B is defined by the radar ᐉϭ ␶ ͑ ͒ mechanics is just as valid as the Lorentz transformation of formula d cd A/2. Using the general metric 1 for light special relativity, because all space–time coordinate transfor- (ds2ϭ0), we find in the Appendix that this distance dᐉ is mations are equally valid in general relativity’’ ͑the democ- given by the spatial metric racy of coordinate systems͒. This statement invariably sparks dᐉ2ϭ␥ dxi dxj, ͑2͒ a heated discussion about what is physically significant in ij GR and serves to introduce the following comments on the where meaning of the spacetime metric. I claim no new results in g g the following—only that this approach to understanding the ␥ ϭ Ϫ 0i 0 j ͑ ͒ ij gij . 3 metric has been useful for the author and may be of some g00 help to others who attempt the daunting task of teaching GR We call Eq. ͑2͒ the metric of physical space for the given to undergraduates. reference frame. It measures proper distance at the point of interest, that is, local radar distance is the same as proper II. REFERENCE FRAMES distance ͑the distance measured with a standard ruler͒. Notice that, when g Þ0, the spatial metric components For our purpose, a reference frame will be defined as a 0i ␥ are not simply the spatial components g of the full collection of fiducial observers distributed over space and ij ij moving in some prescribed manner. Each fiducial observer metric g␣␤ . The example of Einstein’s rotating disk with ͑ ͒ i ϭ measuring rods along the diameter and circumference, as de- FO is assigned space coordinates x (i 1,2,3) that do not ͑ ͒ ͑ ͒ ͓ iϭ picted in Fig. 1, nicely illustrates the use of Eqs. 2 and 3 . change. The FOs are ‘‘at rest’’ (x constant) in these coor- ␪ ͔ In inertial space with polar coordinates (r0 , 0) and origin dinates. Each FO carries a standard measuring rod and a 2 standard clock that measure proper length and proper time at at the center of the disk, the space–time metric reads ds ϭϪ 2 2ϩ 2ϩ 2 ␪2 his/her location. The basic data of GR are the results of local c dt dr0 r0 d 0. A transformation to the frame ro- ⍀ ϭ ␪ϭ␪ measurements made by the FOs. ͑These are the ‘‘10,000 lo- tating with the disk at angular velocity (r r0 , 0 cal witnesses’’ in the words of Taylor and Wheeler.2͒ ϩ⍀t) puts the metric into the form In special relativity, the FOs usually sit on a rigid lattice of ⍀r 2 ⍀ Cartesian coordinates in inertial space; there is a different set ds2ϭϪͫ1Ϫͩ ͪ ͬc2 dt2ϩ2ͩ ͪ r2͑cdt͒d␪ϩdr2 of FOs in a different inertial reference frame. In Schwarzs- c c child space, the FOs reside at constant values of the ϩr2 d␪2, ͑4͒ Schwarzschild space coordinates (r,␪,␾), and, in an ex- ϭϪ Ϫ ⍀ 2 panding universe, the FOs sit at constant values of the co- with nonzero metric components g00 ͓1 ( r/c) ͔, ␪ ␾ ϭ ϭϪ⍀ 2 ϭ ϭ 2 moving Robertson–Walker space coordinates (r, , ). In g0␪ g␪0 r /c, grr 1, and g␪␪ r on coordinates 214 Am. J. Phys. 72 ͑2͒, February 2004 http://aapt.org/ajp 214 IV. PHYSICAL TIME Physical time ˜t in the immediate neighborhood of a par- ticular fiducial observer O is that function of position coor- dinates xi and coordinate time x0ϭct that, when used to measure speed dᐉ/dt˜, places the speed of light ͑the one-way speed͒ at the invariant value c in all directions. Now the general line element ͑1͒ can be written in terms of the physical space metric ͑2͒ as ds2ϭϪc2 dt˜2ϩdᐉ2, ͑8͒ where dt˜ is defined by i g0i dx Fig. 1. Einstein disk rotating about its center O with angular velocity ⍀ dt˜ϵͱϪg dtϪ . ͑9͒ 00 ͱϪ ͑viewed from inertial space͒. Standard measuring rods are laid end-to-end c g00 along the diameter and circumference of the disk and move with the disk. The proof of Eq. ͑8͒ is by direct expansion of this equation using Eqs. ͑2͒, ͑3͒, and the definition ͑9͒ of dt˜. We have used the notation dt˜ because for light (ds2ϭ0), Eq. ͑8͒ x␮ϭ(ct,r,␪). A glance at the metric ͑4͒ might miss that the shows that dt˜ is the time differential that gives the speed of spatial geometry in this reference frame is non-Euclidean. But application of Eqs. ͑2͒ and ͑3͒ gives the spatial metric light dᐉ/dt˜ the value c in all directions, that is, dt˜ is indeed the differential of physical time. r2 d␪2 ͓ iϭ ͑ ͔͒ ᐉ2ϭ 2ϩ ͑ ͒ At observer O at dx 0 in Eq. 9 , the physical time d dr Ϫ͑⍀ ͒2 , 5 ␶ 1 r/c increases at the same rate as the proper time 0 at that loca- ˜ϭͱϪ ϭ ␶ which clearly shows no change of radial distance (dr tion (dt g00dt d 0), and, at the coordinate displace- i ϭdr ) and an increase in measured circumferential distance ment dx from O, the physical time is synchronized with the 0 3 ͓from rd␪ to rd␪/(1Ϫv2/c2)1/2] due to the Lorentz con- clock at O by the Einstein synchronization procedure. By traction of measuring rods placed end-to-end on the circum- the Einstein synchronization procedure, we mean the process ˜ ference and hence moving in the direction of their lengths in which, when the clock at O reads time t 0 and this time is with speed vϭ⍀r. transmitted over the coordinate displacement dxi of length When three-space is flat, we can transform to Cartesian dᐉ at the speed of light, the physical time at the end of this space coordinates for which the spatial metric takes the Eu- journey has the value ˜t ϭ˜t ϩdl/c, that is, it contains the ᐉ2ϭ␦ i j i 0 clidean form d ij dx dx , and the coordinates x mea- retardation correction dᐉ/c required to account for the finite sure distance directly. We shall refer to such coordinates as and invariant propagation speed of the time signal. ͓That the ‘‘physical’’ space coordinates. But, when three-space is ͑ ͒ ˜ curved, global physical coordinates do not exist. We can, definition 9 of the physical time differential dt is consistent however, always transform to local Cartesian coordinates with the Einstein synchronization procedure follows from the dx˜ 1, dx˜ 2, dx˜ 3 in the immediate neighborhood of any chosen fact that dt˜ is the time differential that gives the speed of FO, in which case the local space metric takes the form light the value c in all directions.͔ Another way of saying this is that, in the immediate neighborhood of the given fiducial dᐉ2ϭ͑dx˜ 1͒2ϩ͑dx˜ 2͒2ϩ͑dx˜ 3͒2. ͑6͒ observer O, the condition dt˜ϭ0 ͑or ˜t ϭconstant) defines a ͑Here and in the following we use a tilde to denote differen- hypersurface of simultaneity. tials that may not be exact and, therefore, may not be inte- The all important point of this discussion is that, as a 1 2 grable to global functions.͒ The proper distances dx˜ , dx˜ , temporal coordinate, the physical time ˜t is a very special dx˜ 3 are local physical coordinates measured from the given one. It is the time actually used by the fiducial observer for FO, and are written as differentials to suggest that they can- measurements in his local reference frame.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Explain Inertial and Noninertial Frame of Reference
    Explain Inertial And Noninertial Frame Of Reference Nathanial crows unsmilingly. Grooved Sibyl harlequin, his meadow-brown add-on deletes mutely. Nacred or deputy, Sterne never soot any degeneration! In inertial frames of the air, hastening their fundamental forces on two forces must be frame and share information section i am throwing the car, there is not a severe bottleneck in What city the greatest value in flesh-seconds for this deviation. The definition of key facet having a small, polished surface have a force gem about a pretend or aspect of something. Fictitious Forces and Non-inertial Frames The Coriolis Force. Indeed, for death two particles moving anyhow, a coordinate system may be found among which saturated their trajectories are rectilinear. Inertial reference frame of inertial frames of angular momentum and explain why? This is illustrated below. Use tow of reference in as sentence Sentences YourDictionary. What working the difference between inertial frame and non inertial fr. Frames of Reference Isaac Physics. In forward though some time and explain inertial and noninertial of frame to prove your measurement problem you. This circumstance undermines a defining characteristic of inertial frames: that with respect to shame given inertial frame, the other inertial frame home in uniform rectilinear motion. The redirect does not rub at any valid page. That according to whether the thaw is inertial or non-inertial In the. This follows from what Einstein formulated as his equivalence principlewhich, in an, is inspired by the consequences of fire fall. Frame of reference synonyms Best 16 synonyms for was of. How read you govern a bleed of reference? Name we will balance in noninertial frame at its axis from another hamiltonian with each printed as explained at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Dilation of Accelerated Clocks
    Astrophysical Institute Neunhof Circular se07117, February 2016 1 Time Dilation of accelerated Clocks The definitions of proper time and proper length in General Rela- tivity Theory are presented. Time dilation and length contraction are explicitly computed for the example of clocks and rulers which are at rest in a rotating reference frame, and hence accelerated versus inertial reference frames. Experimental proofs of this time dilation, in particular the observation of the decay rates of acceler- ated muons, are discussed. As an illustration of the equivalence principle, we show that the general relativistic equation of motion of objects, which are at rest in a rotating reference frame, reduces to Newtons equation of motion of the same objects at rest in an inertial reference system and subject to a gravitational field. We close with some remarks on real versus ideal clocks, and the “clock hypothesis”. 1. Coordinate Diffeomorphisms In flat Minkowski space, we place a rectangular three-dimensional grid of fiducial marks in three-dimensional position space, and assign cartesian coordinate values x1, x2, x3 to each fiducial mark. The values of the xi are constants for each fiducial mark, i. e. the fiducial marks are at rest in the coordinate frame, which they define. Now we stretch and/or compress and/or skew and/or rotate the grid of fiducial marks locally and/or globally, and/or re-name the fiducial marks, e. g. change from cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates or whatever other coordinates. All movements and renamings of the fiducial marks are subject to the constraint that the map from the initial grid to the deformed and/or renamed grid must be differentiable and invertible (i.
    [Show full text]
  • Frame of Reference Definition
    Frame Of Reference Definition Proximal Sly entrench rompingly or overgorge wrathfully when Dennis is emitting. Abstractive Cy fifes stagesstiff. Palish so agonizedly. Chadd scarifies slier while Zachery always comprising his shoplifters equips irrecusably, he We use what frame of reference definition of his own experiences no knowledge they are the performance measurement of Frame of reference n a wire that uses coordinates to terminate position n a goddess of assumptions and standards that sanction behavior please give it meaning. C74 Common trigger of Reference Information Entity Modules. What Is whisper of Reference in Marketing Small Business. What form a envelope of reference English? These happen all examples that industry a 1-dimensional coordinate system We choose one explain the directions as the positive direction instead of reference A heard of. What is part word to frame of reference WordHippo. Frame of reference definition concept to frame of reference consists of a coordinate system and the wood of physical reference points that uniquely determine. User Manual Frames of reference. Begin by reviewing the definition of the competitive frame of reference The competitive frame of reference is how fancy world of describing the. There will construct the same customers along a frame of coordinate has been widely used in which other words. We want or brand marketing frameworks govern the reference of reference the practitioner must hang out how this. Frame Of Reference Merriam-Webster. Use duration of reference in two sentence Sentences YourDictionary. What's faith the Training FOR rift of Reference IO At Work. How we Establish a Brand's Competitive Frame of Reference.
    [Show full text]
  • COORDINATE TIME in the VICINITY of the EARTH D. W. Allan' and N
    COORDINATE TIME IN THE VICINITY OF THE EARTH D. W. Allan’ and N. Ashby’ 1. Time and Frequency Division, National Bureau of Standards Boulder, Colorado 80303 2. Department of Physics, Campus Box 390 University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309 ABSTRACT. Atomic clock accuracies continue to improve rapidly, requir- ing the inclusion of general relativity for unambiguous time and fre- quency clock comparisons. Atomic clocks are now placed on space vehi- cles and there are many new applications of time and frequency metrology. This paper addresses theoretical and practical limitations in the accuracy of atomic clock comparisons arising from relativity, and demonstrates that accuracies of time and frequency comparison can approach a few picoseconds and a few parts in respectively. 1. INTRODUCTION Recent experience has shown that the accuracy of atomic clocks has improved by about an order of magnitude every seven years. It has therefore been necessary to include relativistic effects in the reali- zation of state-of-the-art time and frequency comparisons for at least the last decade. There is a growing need for agreement about proce- dures for incorporating relativistic effects in all disciplines which use modern time and frequency metrology techniques. The areas of need include sophisticated communication and navigation systems and funda- mental areas of research such as geodesy and radio astrometry. Significant progress has recently been made in arriving at defini- tions €or coordinate time that are practical, and in experimental veri- fication of the self-consistency of these procedures. International Atomic Time (TAI) and Universal Coordinated Time (UTC) have been defin- ed as coordinate time scales to assist in the unambiguous comparison of time and frequency in the vicinity of the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Time Scales and Time Differences
    SECTION 2 TIME SCALES AND TIME DIFFERENCES Contents 2.1 Introduction .....................................................................................2–3 2.2 Time Scales .......................................................................................2–3 2.2.1 Ephemeris Time (ET) .......................................................2–3 2.2.2 International Atomic Time (TAI) ...................................2–3 2.2.3 Universal Time (UT1 and UT1R)....................................2–4 2.2.4 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)..............................2–5 2.2.5 GPS or TOPEX Master Time (GPS or TPX)...................2–5 2.2.6 Station Time (ST) ..............................................................2–5 2.3 Time Differences..............................................................................2–6 2.3.1 ET − TAI.............................................................................2–6 2.3.1.1 The Metric Tensor and the Metric...................2–6 2.3.1.2 Solar-System Barycentric Frame of Reference............................................................2–10 2.3.1.2.1 Tracking Station on Earth .................2–13 2.3.1.2.2 Earth Satellite ......................................2–16 2.3.1.2.3 Approximate Expression...................2–17 2.3.1.3 Geocentric Frame of Reference.......................2–18 2–1 SECTION 2 2.3.1.3.1 Tracking Station on Earth .................2–19 2.3.1.3.2 Earth Satellite ......................................2–20 2.3.2 TAI − UTC .........................................................................2–20
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2012.15331V1 [Gr-Qc] 30 Dec 2020 Correlations Due to Gravity-Induced Spin Precession [8]
    Quantum nonlocality in extended theories of gravity 1 2;3 3;4 Victor A. S. V. Bittencourt∗ , Massimo Blasoney , Fabrizio Illuminatiz , Gaetano 2;3 2;3 3;4 Lambiasex , Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano{ , and Luciano Petruzziello∗∗ 1Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Staudtstraße 2, PLZ 91058, Erlangen, Germany. 2Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adegli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132 I-84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy. 3INFN, Sezione di Napoli, Gruppo collegato di Salerno, Italy. 4Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale, Universit`adegli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132 I-84084 Fisciano (SA), Italy. (Dated: January 1, 2021) We investigate how pure-state Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations in the internal degrees of freedom of massive particles are affected by a curved spacetime background described by extended theories of gravity. We consider models for which the corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action are quadratic in the curvature invariants and we focus on the weak-field limit. We quantify nonlocal quantum correlations by means of the violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality, and show how a curved background suppresses the violation by a leading term due to general relativity and a further contribution due to the corrections to Einstein gravity. Our results can be generalized to massless particles such as photon pairs and can thus be suitably exploited to devise precise experimental tests of extended models of gravity. I. INTRODUCTION The gedanken experiment proposed by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) [1] has revealed one of the most striking features of quantum mechanics (QM): the capability of sharing nonlocal correlations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short and Transparent Derivation of the Lorentz-Einstein Transformations
    A brief and transparent derivation of the Lorentz-Einstein transformations via thought experiments Bernhard Rothenstein1), Stefan Popescu 2) and George J. Spix 3) 1) Politehnica University of Timisoara, Physics Department, Timisoara, Romania 2) Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany 3) BSEE Illinois Institute of Technology, USA Abstract. Starting with a thought experiment proposed by Kard10, which derives the formula that accounts for the relativistic effect of length contraction, we present a “two line” transparent derivation of the Lorentz-Einstein transformations for the space-time coordinates of the same event. Our derivation make uses of Einstein’s clock synchronization procedure. 1. Introduction Authors make a merit of the fact that they derive the basic formulas of special relativity without using the Lorentz-Einstein transformations (LET). Thought experiments play an important part in their derivations. Some of these approaches are devoted to the derivation of a given formula whereas others present a chain of derivations for the formulas of relativistic kinematics in a given succession. Two anthological papers1,2 present a “two line” derivation of the formula that accounts for the time dilation using as relativistic ingredients the invariant and finite light speed in free space c and the invariance of distances measured perpendicular to the direction of relative motion of the inertial reference frame from where the same “light clock” is observed. Many textbooks present a more elaborated derivation of the time dilation formula using a light clock that consists of two parallel mirrors located at a given distance apart from each other and a light signal that bounces between when observing it from two inertial reference frames in relative motion.3,4 The derivation of the time dilation formula is intimately related to the formula that accounts for the length contraction derived also without using the LET.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIVISTIC GRAVITY and the ORIGIN of INERTIA and INERTIAL MASS K Tsarouchas
    RELATIVISTIC GRAVITY AND THE ORIGIN OF INERTIA AND INERTIAL MASS K Tsarouchas To cite this version: K Tsarouchas. RELATIVISTIC GRAVITY AND THE ORIGIN OF INERTIA AND INERTIAL MASS. 2021. hal-01474982v5 HAL Id: hal-01474982 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01474982v5 Preprint submitted on 3 Feb 2021 (v5), last revised 11 Jul 2021 (v6) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Relativistic Gravity and the Origin of Inertia and Inertial Mass K. I. Tsarouchas School of Mechanical Engineering National Technical University of Athens, Greece E-mail-1: [email protected] - E-mail-2: [email protected] Abstract If equilibrium is to be a frame-independent condition, it is necessary the gravitational force to have precisely the same transformation law as that of the Lorentz-force. Therefore, gravity should be described by a gravitomagnetic theory with equations which have the same mathematical form as those of the electromagnetic theory, with the gravitational mass as a Lorentz invariant. Using this gravitomagnetic theory, in order to ensure the relativity of all kinds of translatory motion, we accept the principle of covariance and the equivalence principle and thus we prove that, 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology Midterm
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Department Physics 8.20 IAP 2005 Special Relativity January 18, 2005 7:30–9:30 pm Midterm Instructions • This exam contains SIX problems – pace yourself accordingly! • You have two hours for this test. Papers will be picked up at 9:30 pm sharp. • The exam is scored on a basis of 100 points. • Please do ALL your work in the white booklets that have been passed out. There are extra booklets available if you need a second. • Please remember to put your name on the front of your exam booklet. • If you have any questions please feel free to ask the proctor(s). 1 2 Information Lorentz transformation (along the x­axis) and its inverse x� = γ(x − βct) x = γ(x� + βct�) y� = y y = y� z� = z z = z� ct� = γ(ct − βx) ct = γ(ct� + βx�) � where β = v/c, and γ = 1/ 1 − β2. Velocity addition (relative motion along the x­axis): � ux − v ux = 2 1 − uxv/c � uy uy = 2 γ(1 − uxv/c ) � uz uz = 2 γ(1 − uxv/c ) Doppler shift Longitudinal � 1 + β ν = ν 1 − β 0 Quadratic equation: ax2 + bx + c = 0 1 � � � x = −b ± b2 − 4ac 2a Binomial expansion: b(b − 1) (1 + a)b = 1 + ba + a 2 + . 2 3 Problem 1 [30 points] Short Answer (a) [4 points] State the postulates upon which Einstein based Special Relativity. (b) [5 points] Outline a derviation of the Lorentz transformation, describing each step in no more than one sentence and omitting all algebra. (c) [2 points] Define proper length and proper time.
    [Show full text]
  • Observer with a Constant Proper Acceleration Cannot Be Treated Within the Theory of Special Relativity and That Theory of General Relativity Is Absolutely Necessary
    Observer with a constant proper acceleration Claude Semay∗ Groupe de Physique Nucl´eaire Th´eorique, Universit´ede Mons-Hainaut, Acad´emie universitaire Wallonie-Bruxelles, Place du Parc 20, BE-7000 Mons, Belgium (Dated: February 2, 2008) Abstract Relying on the equivalence principle, a first approach of the general theory of relativity is pre- sented using the spacetime metric of an observer with a constant proper acceleration. Within this non inertial frame, the equation of motion of a freely moving object is studied and the equation of motion of a second accelerated observer with the same proper acceleration is examined. A com- parison of the metric of the accelerated observer with the metric due to a gravitational field is also performed. PACS numbers: 03.30.+p,04.20.-q arXiv:physics/0601179v1 [physics.ed-ph] 23 Jan 2006 ∗FNRS Research Associate; E-mail: [email protected] Typeset by REVTEX 1 I. INTRODUCTION The study of a motion with a constant proper acceleration is a classical exercise of special relativity that can be found in many textbooks [1, 2, 3]. With its analytical solution, it is possible to show that the limit speed of light is asymptotically reached despite the constant proper acceleration. The very prominent notion of event horizon can be introduced in a simple context and the problem of the twin paradox can also be analysed. In many articles of popularisation, it is sometimes stated that the point of view of an observer with a constant proper acceleration cannot be treated within the theory of special relativity and that theory of general relativity is absolutely necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIVITY’ - Part II
    THE PHYSICAL BASIS OF ‘RELATIVITY’ - Part II Experiment to Verify that Light Moves having the Gravitational Field as the Local Reference and Discussion of Experimental Data. Viraj P.L. Fernando, Independent Researcher on Evolution and Philosophy of Physics 193, Kaldemulla Road, Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. [email protected] Abstract: The part I of this paper presented a novel Kinetic Theory of Relativity based upon action of energy by way of a thermodynamic analogy. The present part of the paper will discuss important experimental data relevant to this Kinetic Theory. The experiment will explain the result of Michelson’s experiment by way of demonstrating the reason why the velocity of light remains the same with respect to Earth’s orbital motion in all directions is because light moves having the Sun’s gravitational field as the local reference frame and not the frame of Earth’ orbital motion. In the course of explaining the reasons for the result of Michelson’s experiment, we also find an explanation for the aberration of starlight. It will be shown that all presently known experiments are consistent with the theory presented in the original paper (Part I). Since the same principle of redundancy a fraction energy applies to all cases equally, the case of delay of disintegration of a fast moving muon, which is supposed to fall into the domain of the special theory, and the case of the precession of the perihelion of Mercury, which is supposed to fall into the domain of the general theory are solved identically. In each case the required result is obtained by the application of the methodology of ‘synthesis of antithetical equations’.
    [Show full text]
  • Coordinate Systems in De Sitter Spacetime Bachelor Thesis A.C
    Coordinate systems in De Sitter spacetime Bachelor thesis A.C. Ripken July 19, 2013 Radboud University Nijmegen Radboud Honours Academy Abstract The De Sitter metric is a solution for the Einstein equation with positive cosmological constant, modelling an expanding universe. The De Sitter metric has a coordinate sin- gularity corresponding to an event horizon. The physical properties of this horizon are studied. The Klein-Gordon equation is generalized for curved spacetime, and solved in various coordinate systems in De Sitter space. Contact Name Chris Ripken Email [email protected] Student number 4049489 Study Physicsandmathematics Supervisor Name prof.dr.R.H.PKleiss Email [email protected] Department Theoretical High Energy Physics Adress Heyendaalseweg 135, Nijmegen Cover illustration Projection of two-dimensional De Sitter spacetime embedded in Minkowski space. Three coordinate systems are used: global coordinates, static coordinates, and static coordinates rotated in the (x1,x2)-plane. Contents Preface 3 1 Introduction 4 1.1 TheEinsteinfieldequations . 4 1.2 Thegeodesicequations. 6 1.3 DeSitterspace ................................. 7 1.4 TheKlein-Gordonequation . 10 2 Coordinate transformations 12 2.1 Transformations to non-singular coordinates . ......... 12 2.2 Transformationsofthestaticmetric . ..... 15 2.3 Atranslationoftheorigin . 22 3 Geodesics 25 4 The Klein-Gordon equation 28 4.1 Flatspace.................................... 28 4.2 Staticcoordinates ............................... 30 4.3 Flatslicingcoordinates. 32 5 Conclusion 39 Bibliography 40 A Maple code 41 A.1 Theprocedure‘riemann’. 41 A.2 Flatslicingcoordinates. 50 A.3 Transformationsofthestaticmetric . ..... 50 A.4 Geodesics .................................... 51 A.5 TheKleinGordonequation . 52 1 Preface For ages, people have studied the motion of objects. These objects could be close to home, like marbles on a table, or far away, like planets and stars.
    [Show full text]