Allostery in the Ferredoxin Protein Motif Does Not Involve a Conformational Switch

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Allostery in the Ferredoxin Protein Motif Does Not Involve a Conformational Switch Allostery in the ferredoxin protein motif does not involve a conformational switch Rachel Nechushtaia, Heiko Lammertb, Dorit Michaelia, Yael Eisenberg-Domovicha, John A. Zurisc, Maria A. Lucac, Dominique T. Capraroc, Alex Fisha, Odelia Shimshona, Melinda Royc, Alexander Schugb,d, Paul C. Whitforde, Oded Livnaha, José N. Onuchicb,1, and Patricia A. Jenningsc,1 aLife Science Institute and The Wolfson Centre for Applied Structural Biology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, Jerusalem 91904, Israel; bCenter for Theoretical Biological Physics and the Department of Physics, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0375; cDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California at San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093- 0375; dDepartment of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; and eLos Alamos National Laboratory, Theoretical Biology and Biophysics, MS K710, Los Alamos, NM 87545 Contributed by José N. Onuchic, December 28, 2010 (sent for review December 11, 2010) Regulation of protein function via cracking, or local unfolding substantial theoretical (9–13) and experimental (14, 15) work and refolding of substructures, is becoming a widely recognized has aimed at revealing the details of the functionally relevant mechanism of functional control. Oftentimes, cracking events are transition-state ensembles. These investigations have shown localized to secondary and tertiary structure interactions between that rearrangements may involve a degree of cracking, or loca- domains that control the optimal position for catalysis and/or the lized unfolding and refolding, which serves to reduce the asso- formation of protein complexes. Small changes in free energy ciated free-energy barriers (16, 17). By modulating the balance associated with ligand binding, phosphorylation, etc., can tip the of these order–disorder transitions that control domain–domain balance and provide a regulatory functional switch. However, interactions/orientations, cells may tune the functional dynamics. understanding the factors controlling function in single-domain Despite these conceptual advances in understanding enzyme reg- proteins is still a significant challenge to structural biologists. We ulation, these principles may not be applicable to single-domain investigated the functional landscape of a single-domain plant- proteins if they do not exhibit large-scale structural rearrange- type ferredoxin protein and the effect of a distal loop on the elec- ments. In those cases, alternative modes of functional control BIOPHYSICS AND tron-transfer center. We find the global stability and structure are are likely employed by the cell. COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY minimally perturbed with mutation, whereas the functional prop- In the present study, we investigate the relationship between erties are altered. Specifically, truncating the L1,2 loop does not structure, dynamics, and function for a single-domain plant-type lead to large-scale changes in the structure, determined via X-ray ferredoxin (Fdx) protein. This Fdx folding motif is among the crystallography. Further, the overall thermal stability of the protein most abundant in nature, and it has been well studied previously is only marginally perturbed by the mutation. However, even biochemically (18–23), making Fdx an excellent candidate for though the mutation is distal to the iron–sulfur cluster (∼20 Å), it quantitative, biophysical characterization. Moreover, the plant- leads to a significant change in the redox potential of the iron– type Fdx folding motif has been found in numerous redox pro- sulfur cluster (57 mV). Structure-based all-atom simulations indi- teins and enzymes, as well as in functionally unrelated proteins cate correlated dynamical changes between the surface-exposed that do not contain the [2Fe-2S] cluster, such as ubiquitin and loop and the iron–sulfur cluster-binding region. Our results suggest the immunoglobulin-binding domain of protein G (24, 25). Cir- intrinsic communication channels within the ferredoxin fold, com- cular permutation of the secondary structure units helped identify posed of many short-range interactions, lead to the propagation of previously unrecognized homologs, such as the mercury transpor- long-range signals. Accordingly, protein interface interactions that ter protein MerP (26). This versatility suggests that a fundamen- ’ involve L1,2 could potentially signal functional changes in distal tal understanding of the fold s dynamical properties may facilitate regions, similar to what is observed in other allosteric systems. the design of proteins with tightly regulated, and unique, func- tional roles (27). The development of “modular” proteins that electron transfer ∣ functional energy landscape ∣ iron–sulfur proteins ∣ can be artificially assembled into large functional complexes is protein folding also at the heart of modern synthetic biology (28). When com- plexed with iron–sulfur clusters, Fdx proteins possess electron ver the last several decades, our understanding of protein transport properties, which suggests they could be a component function has evolved from a rather static perspective, where in artificial photosynthetic devices and other biologically moti- O vated molecular “circuitry.” signaling and function have been understood through surface The potential role of iron–sulfur (FeS) proteins in synthetic complementarity arguments, such as the “lock and key” paradigm biology is inspired by their role inside the cell. These proteins (1, 2), to a more dynamic view where protein conformational are key players in the three life-essential processes: photosynth- fluctuations are inextricably linked to function (3). As our under- esis, nitrogen fixation, and respiration (29, 30). The plant-type standing of protein dynamics expands, we are revealing many Fdx proteins carry a single surface-exposed [2Fe-2S] iron–sulfur mechanisms by which proteins exploit conformational fluctua- tions to perform cellular function. In multidomain proteins, relative repositioning of domains is often linked to their levels Author contributions: R.N., H.L., D.M., Y.E.-D., J.Z., M.A.L., D.T.C., A.F., O.S., M.R., A.S., of activity. For example, large-scale domain rearrangements in P.C.W., O.L., J.N.O., and P.A.J. designed research; R.N., H.L., D.M., Y.E.-D., J.Z., M.A.L., D.T.C., A.F., O.S., M.R., and A.S. performed research; R.N., H.L., P.C.W., O.L., and P.A.J. the four-domain Src kinase (4) and C-terminal Src kinase (5, 6) analyzed data; and R.N., H.L., P.C.W., O.L., J.N.O., and P.A.J. wrote the paper. lead to these proteins being in so-called “on” or “off” states, and The authors declare no conflict of interest. functional regulation may be obtained by adjusting the balance Data deposition: The crystallography, atomic coordinates, and structure factors have been between these conformations (7). In proteins such as adenylate deposited in the Protein Data Bank, www.pdb.org (PDB ID code 3P63). kinase, domain rearrangements can be rate limiting during each 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: [email protected] or round of catalysis (8), where the enzyme cycles between ligand- [email protected]. competent and ligand-release conformations. Because the kinet- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/ ics of these transitions control the activity level of the protein, doi:10.1073/pnas.1019502108/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1019502108 PNAS Early Edition ∣ 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 cluster (ISC) (19), and homologous proteins are found in all organisms, e.g., adrenodoxin in human mitochondria (20). The E oxidation-reduction potentials ( m) of these Fdx proteins range C’ from −325 mV to around −450 mV (21), making Fdx one of the strongest soluble reducing agents in nature (22). The plant-type Fdx functions primarily as the electron acceptor of photosystem I, and upon reduction Fdx functions as an electron donor in a myr- iad of key metabolic pathways (e.g., NADPþ reduction, carbon assimilation, nitrite and sulfite reduction, glutamate synthesis, and thioredoxin reduction, etc.) (22, 23, 31–35). The Fdx fold (22, 23, 31, 36), also termed the β-grasp, or UB roll, is found throughout the cell. The minimum core elements N’ consist of a four-stranded mixed β-sheet with an α-helix packed across one face. Loop insertions and additional strands/helices may be incorporated into this fold for functional purposes. A rib- bon diagram of the tertiary fold of Mastigocladus laminosus Fdx (mFdx), is shown in Fig. 1 (19, 37). Substitution of the flexible L1,2 loop (residues 10–14) of wild-type Fdx (mFdxWT) with the rigid β-turn of a mesophilic Fdx (residues 10–12) (here we refer to this substituted mutant as mFdxΔL1;2),* yields a protein that is functional at 23 °C but loses electron-transfer (ET) activity at 55 °C (19), whereas mFdx is fully active. This loss of function is not due to dissociation of the [2Fe-2S] cluster, as this moiety is stable to 75 °C. The highly spe- L1,2 cific effects of this isolated mutation is a well-defined feature, β1 making mFdx ideal for exploring the relationship between a pro- tein’s functional and dynamical properties. Through a combined experimental-theoretical investigation, we find that the network of short-range residue–residue interac- tions that define the Fdx fold directly facilitates long-range communication between L1,2 and the ISC pocket. Protein–film voltammetry (PFV) showed that the deletion of loop L1,2 alters the redox potential of the functional [2Fe-2S] center, ca. 20 Å re- moved from the site of mutation. X-ray crystallography and tem- perature-dependent CD studies revealed that, despite changes in β2 the ET rates at high temperatures, the global structure and stabi- lity of the protein are robust. The only noticeable structural Fig. 1. Loop deletion does not have global effects on the structure of mFdx. changes (i.e., larger than the uncertainties in the crystallographic (Top) Ribbon representation of M.
Recommended publications
  • The Relationship Between Protein Structure and Function: a Comprehensive Survey with Application to the Yeast Genome Hedi Hegyi and Mark Gerstein*
    Article No. jmbi.1999.2661 available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on J. Mol. Biol. (1999) 000, 1±18 The Relationship Between Protein Structure and Function: A Comprehensive Survey with Application to the Yeast Genome Hedi Hegyi and Mark Gerstein* Department of Molecular For most proteins in the genome databases, function is predicted via Biophysics & Biochemistry sequence comparison. In spite of the popularity of this approach, the Yale University, 266 Whitney extent to which it can be reliably applied is unknown. We address this Avenue, PO Box 208114 issue by systematically investigating the relationship between protein New Haven, CT, 06520 USA function and structure. We focus initially on enzymes classi®ed by the Enzyme Commission (EC) and relate these to structurally classi®ed pro- teins in the SCOP database. We ®nd that the major SCOP fold classes have different propensities to carry out certain broad categories of func- tions. For instance, alpha/beta folds are disproportionately associated with enzymes, especially transferases and hydrolases, and all-alpha and small folds with non-enzymes, while alpha beta folds have an equal tendency either way. These observations for the database overall are lar- gely true for speci®c genomes. We focus, in particular, on yeast, analyz- ing it with many classi®cations in addition to SCOP and EC (i.e. COGs, CATH, MIPS), and ®nd clear tendencies for fold-function association, across a broad spectrum of functions. Analysis with the COGs scheme also suggests that the functions of the most ancient proteins are more evenly distributed among different structural classes than those of more modern ones.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Figure S1. Poly I:C Induces IFN-Β Expression
    SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Figure S1. Poly I:C induces IFN-β expression and signaling. Fibroblasts were incubated in media with or without Poly I:C for 24 h. RNA was isolated and processed for microarray analysis. Genes showing >2-fold up- or down-regulation compared to control fibroblasts were analyzed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis Software (Red color, up-regulation; Green color, down-regulation). The transcripts with known gene identifiers (HUGO gene symbols) were entered into the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base IPA 4.0. Each gene identifier mapped in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base was termed as a focus gene, which was overlaid into a global molecular network established from the information in the Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base. Each network contained a maximum of 35 focus genes. 1 Figure S2. The overlap of genes regulated by Poly I:C and by IFN. Bioinformatics analysis was conducted to generate a list of 2003 genes showing >2 fold up or down- regulation in fibroblasts treated with Poly I:C for 24 h. The overlap of this gene set with the 117 skin gene IFN Core Signature comprised of datasets of skin cells stimulated by IFN (Wong et al, 2012) was generated using Microsoft Excel. 2 Symbol Description polyIC 24h IFN 24h CXCL10 chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 10 129 7.14 CCL5 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 118 1.12 CCL5 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 115 1.01 OASL 2'-5'-oligoadenylate synthetase-like 83.3 9.52 CCL8 chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 8 78.5 3.25 IDO1 indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 76.3 3.5 IFI27 interferon, alpha-inducible
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Genomics Analysis: Characteristics of Atypical, Typical, and Horizontally Transferred Folds
    Structural Genomics Analysis: Characteristics of atypical, typical, and horizontally transferred folds Hedi Hegyi, Jimmy Lin, Dov Greenbaum, & Mark Gerstein Department of Molecular Biophysics & Biochemistry 266 Whitney Avenue, Yale University PO Box 208114, New Haven, CT 06520 (203) 432-6105, FAX (203) 432-5175 [email protected] (Revised version, 092101) ABSTRACT We carried out a structural-genomics analysis of the folds and structural superfamilies in the first 20 completely sequenced genomes, focusing on the patterns of fold usage and trying to identify structural characteristics of typical and atypical folds. We assigned folds to sequences using PSI-blast, run with a systematic protocol to reduce the amount of computational overhead. On average, folds could be assigned to about a fourth of the ORFs in the genomes and about a fifth of the amino acids in the proteomes. More than 80% of all the folds in the SCOP structural classification were identified in one of the 20 organisms, with worm and E. coli having the largest number of distinct folds. Folds are particularly effective at comprehensively measuring levels of gene duplication, as they group together even very remote homologues. Using folds, we find the average level of duplication varies depending on the complexity of the organism, ranging from 2.4 in M. genitalium to 32 for the worm -- values significantly higher than those observed based purely on sequence similarity. We rank the common folds in the 20 organisms, finding that the top three are the P-loop NTP hydrolase, the ferrodoxin fold, and the TIM-barrel, and discuss in detail the many factors that affect and bias these rankings.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteins Eugene Shakhnovich Harvard University Boulder, CO July 25-27 2012 Outline
    Proteins Eugene Shakhnovich Harvard University Boulder, CO July 25-27 2012 Outline Lecture 1. Introduction: Principles of structural organization of proteins and Protein Universe. Concepts of convergent and divergent molecular evolution. Lecture 2. Protein folding – Experiment and Theory and Simulations Lecture 3: Bridging scales: From Protein Biophysics to Population Genetics (‘’From Crick to Darwin and back’’) Marriage made in heaven: genomics and protein folding/evolution Proteins are folded on various scales As of now we know hundreds of thousands of sequences (Swissprot) and a few thousand of Structures (protein data bank) Proteins are tightly packed Structural organization of globular proteins Fold, Folding Pattern and Packing Simplified models of protein structures. a), A detailed fold describing positions of secondary structures in the protein hain and in space (see also Fig. 13-1e). (b), The folding pattern of the protein chain with omitted details of loop pathways, the size and exact orientation of α-helices (shown as cylinders) and β-strands (shown as arrows). (c), Packing: a stack of structural segments with no loop shown and omitted details of size, orientation and direction of α-helices and β-strands (which are therefore presented as ribbons rather than as arrows). Similarities at the fold level, differences at the detailed structural level Two close relatives: horse hemoglobin α and horse hemoglobin β (both possessing a heme shown as a wire model with iron in the center). Find similarities and differences. (For tips: they are highly similar although have some differences in details of loop conformations, in details of orientation of some helices, and in one additional helical turn available in the β globin, on the right).
    [Show full text]
  • ©Copyright 2014 Javier Castellanos I
    ©Copyright 2014! Javier Castellanos $i Iterative Multistate Negative Design of protein folds Javier Castellanos ! A dissertation! submitted in partial fulfillment of the! requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington! 2014 Reading Committee:! David Baker, Chair! Barry Stoddard! Wim Hol Program Authorized to Offer Degree:! Biochemistry $ii University of Washington Abstract Iterative Multistate Negative Design of protein folds! Javier Castellanos Chair of Supervisory Committee:! Professor David Baker! Department of Biochemistry One of the challenges of computational de novo protein design is to find a protein sequence that adopts a desired conformation disfavoring alternative low energy conformations. A protein adopts a specific fold when the interactions that stabilize the native state collectively outweigh the interactions present in all the possible alternative states. To stabilize a protein in a specific fold one can either reduce the energy of the protein in the target conformation(positive design) or increase the energy of the alternative conformations(negative design). Here we describe a new protocol that simultaneously stabilizes the target state and destabilizes the possible alternative low energy states of de novo design proteins. The new protocol performs a contact analysis of the alternative states $i to identify residues that are participating undesired contacts and then performs a multi state sequence optimization of those positions. After iterations of sampling,analysis and optimization the protocol
    [Show full text]
  • Sampling of Structure and Sequence Space of Small Protein Folds
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.10.434454; this version posted March 11, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Sampling of Structure and Sequence Space of Small Protein Folds Linsky T*1,2, Noble K*3, Tobin A*3, Crow R*4, Lauren Carter2, Urbauer J 5, Baker D1,2,6, Strauch EM3,7# *Contributed equally #Corresponding author 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. 2Institute for Protein Design, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. 3Department of Pharmaceutical anD BiomeDical Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. 4Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. 5Department of Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. 6 HowarD Hughes MeDical Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 7Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA. Nature only samples a small fraction in sequence space, yet many more amino acid combinations can fold into stable proteins. Furthermore, small structural variations in a single fold, which may only be a few amino acids different from the next homolog, define their molecular function. Hence, to design proteins with novel molecular functionalities, such as molecular recognition, methods to control and sample shape diversity are necessary. To explore this space, we developed and experimentally validated a computational platform that can design a wide variety of small protein folds while sampling high shape diversity. We designed and evaluated about 30,000 de novo protein designs of 7 different folds.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanistic Evaluation of Inhibitors Against Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Shikimate Kinase
    Transition from classical methods to new strategies: Mechanistic evaluation of inhibitors against Mycobacterium tuberculosis shikimate kinase by Ngolui René Fuanta A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Auburn, Alabama August 4, 2018 Keywords: Kinetics, spectrometry, tuberculosis, spectrofluorimetry, dissociation constants Copyright 2018 by Ngolui René Fuanta. Approved by Douglas Goodwin, Chair, Associate Professor, Chemistry and Biochemistry Holly Ellis, Professor, Chemistry and Biochemistry Chris Easley, Professor, Chemistry and Biochemistry Steve Mansoorabadi, Assistant Professor, Chemistry and Biochemistry Angela Calderón, Associate Professor, Drug Discovery and Development Abstract Tuberculosis (TB) still stands as one of the leading causes of mortality resulting from an infectious agent. In part, this stems from the emergence of multidrug and extensive drug-resistant strains of tubercle bacilli, demonstrating the pressing need for the development of novel anti tubercular agents. Interestingly, the shikimate pathway, found in plants, bacteria, fungi and algae, is essential for the survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This pathway produces precursors to aromatic amino acids and other aromatic cellular metabolites. Fortunately, it has no mammalian analogue. This makes the enzymes of this pathway suitable targets for the development of novel anti-microbial agents. The research presented in this dissertation focuses on Mycobacterium tuberculosis shikimate kinase (MtSK). Our objectives were to develop LC- MS-based screening and characterization of potential anti tubercular agents – natural, synthetic or semi synthetic, develop fluorescence methods for rapid mechanistic evaluation of MtSK inhibitors and strategies for screening out promiscuous inhibitors. Using mass spectrometry, we characterized a group of marine derived compounds, manzamine alkaloids.
    [Show full text]
  • Hnrnp K Co-Immunoprecipitated Transcripts Regulated by BDNF
    Table 1-5 - hnRNP K co-immunoprecipitated transcripts regulated by BDNF Gene Symbol Description Fold change LOC302228 PREDICTED: Rattus norvegicus similar to Spindlin-like protein 2 (SPIN-2) (LOC302228), mRNA [XM_229842] 0,085 Tuba3a Rattus norvegicus tubulin, alpha 3A (Tuba3a), mRNA [NM_001040008] 0,204 Fabp12 Rattus norvegicus fatty acid binding protein 12 (Fabp12), mRNA [NM_001134614] 0,215 Slc12a8 Rattus norvegicus solute carrier family 12 (potassium/chloride transporters), member 8 (Slc12a8), mRNA [NM_153625] 0,222 Nog Rattus norvegicus noggin (Nog), mRNA [NM_012990] 0,225 0 Unknown 0,233 Gpx2 Rattus norvegicus glutathione peroxidase 2 (Gpx2), mRNA [NM_183403] 0,251 Ltb Rattus norvegicus lymphotoxin beta (TNF superfamily, member 3) (Ltb), mRNA [NM_212507] 0,255 Ahrr Rattus norvegicus aryl-hydrocarbon receptor repressor (Ahrr), mRNA [NM_001024285] 0,271 0 Uncharacterized protein [Source:UniProtKB/TrEMBL;Acc:D3ZUC5] [ENSRNOT00000046312] 0,273 Megf8 PREDICTED: Rattus norvegicus multiple EGF-like-domains 8 (Megf8), mRNA [XM_341803] 0,274 Pdcl2 PREDICTED: Rattus norvegicus phosducin-like 2 (Pdcl2), mRNA [XM_001076368] 0,284 Mepe Rattus norvegicus matrix extracellular phosphoglycoprotein (Mepe), mRNA [NM_024142] 0,289 Galr3 Rattus norvegicus galanin receptor 3 (Galr3), mRNA [NM_019173] 0,290 LOC685685 PREDICTED: Rattus norvegicus similar to S100 calcium-binding protein, ventral prostate (LOC685685), mRNA [XM_001064819] 0,306 Sec16b Rattus norvegicus SEC16 homolog B (S. cerevisiae) (Sec16b), mRNA [NM_053571] 0,314 Fam20a Rattus norvegicus
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Internally Symmetric Protein Structures Changhoon Kim1,2, Jodi Basner1, Byungkook Lee1*
    Kim et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:303 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/303 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Detecting internally symmetric protein structures Changhoon Kim1,2, Jodi Basner1, Byungkook Lee1* Abstract Background: Many functional proteins have a symmetric structure. Most of these are multimeric complexes, which are made of non-symmetric monomers arranged in a symmetric manner. However, there are also a large number of proteins that have a symmetric structure in the monomeric state. These internally symmetric proteins are interesting objects from the point of view of their folding, function, and evolution. Most algorithms that detect the internally symmetric proteins depend on finding repeating units of similar structure and do not use the symmetry information. Results: We describe a new method, called SymD, for detecting symmetric protein structures. The SymD procedure works by comparing the structure to its own copy after the copy is circularly permuted by all possible number of residues. The procedure is relatively insensitive to symmetry-breaking insertions and deletions and amplifies positive signals from symmetry. It finds 70% to 80% of the TIM barrel fold domains in the ASTRAL 40 domain database and 100% of the beta-propellers as symmetric. More globally, 10% to 15% of the proteins in the ASTRAL 40 domain database may be considered symmetric according to this procedure depending on the precise cutoff value used to measure the degree of perfection of the symmetry. Symmetrical proteins occur in all structural classes and can have a closed, circular structure, a cylindrical barrel-like structure, or an open, helical structure. Conclusions: SymD is a sensitive procedure for detecting internally symmetric protein structures.
    [Show full text]