DOCSLIB.ORG

Iiii Iiiiii Ii I Vviviiviiiixix Xxixii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iiii Iiiiii Ii I Vviviiviiiixix Xxixii Chapter Ten : Ecology XI XII I X II III III IX IIII Introduction IIII regenerating woodland is found in the east of the site immediately bordering amenity gardens which forms part of the grounds of the old cottages and Mill VIII 10.1VIII This chapter examines the ecological impacts of the development house. The majority of the site is buildings and hardstanding. A mill pond V V VII VII VI proposals during constructionVI and operation. It includes a description of the borders the site to the north east and mature broadleaved woodland to the study area, an outline of the methodology used an assessment of potential north and east. The B3400 runs along the southern boundary . impacts, followed by details of mitigation measures and an assessment of the significance of any residual impacts. The baseline data collected by Jaquelin Methodology Fisher Associates (JFA) is provided as a technical appendix. 10.5 The overall approach to the collection of baseline data is based upon Study Area “Guidelines for Baseline Ecological Assessment” (IEA, 1995). The methodology used to assess impacts is based on methods recommended in standard EIA 10.2 The study area includes the site and surrounding land. The exact guidance, particularly “Nature Conservation in Environmental Assessment” extent of the survey area for each survey are provided in figures 10.1 – 10.3 (English Nature, 1994) and EC DGXI publications including the “Guidance on and methodologies in Appendix 4. Scoping” (DGXI, 1996). Consideration has also been given to the ‘Guidance for Ecological Impact Assessment in the United Kingdom’ produced by the 10.3 The River Test, a designated Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), is Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management (IEEM, 2006). a shallow-bottomed chalk stream which flows through Laverstoke Mill from east to west. There are two branches of the river that flow across the central and northern parts of the site. The river and its banks have been modified as 10.6 Desk studies were undertaken in 2007 and updated in 2009. part of the old mill works where sluices, concrete channels and culverts have Biological records for statutory and non-statutory designated wildlife sites, been constructed. These features affect the physical character and ecology of ancient woodland, specially protected species, and species of conservation the river and its banks. concern (only records held since 1999 are included) at the site and surrounding 1km (2km for Badgers and Bats) were requested from the following: 10.4 The majority of the site consists of buildings and hardstanding with some amenity grassland and ornamental planting. An area of secondary Laverstoke Mill Environmental Statement 141 Chapter Ten : Ecology • Hampshire Biological Records Centre (HBRC) – data sets are provided by the The Level of Importance of the Receptor Hampshire Wildlife Trust (HWT) which obtain information from; Hampshire Amphibian and Reptile Group (HARG), Hampshire Invertebrate Network 10.9 The receptor is defined as the feature affected by an impact. This (HNIC), the Hampshire Mammal Group and the Hampshire Ornithological receptor may be of negligible nature conservation value, or it may have a value at Society. Data sets are also provided by the Butterfly Conservation’s butterfly the local, county, national or international level. and moth database. 10.10 Features of international importance are those protected by international • Hampshire Ornithological Society treaties, legislation, agreements and designations. Examples include World • Hampshire Bat Group Heritage Sites, Ramsar sites, Special Protection Areas and Special Areas of • East Hants Badger Group Conservation. Certain species are also protected under international law, such as • Environment Agency those listed in the Habitats Directive (1992). More detailed methodologies and full species lists for the surveys are provided in 10.11 Features of importance at the national level include those with statutory Appendix 4. protection, such as National Nature Reserves (NNRs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and species with legal protection, and those affected by national 10.7 Ecological impacts from development are identified by relating the policy, such as national Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) priority species and baseline study to the master plan and information contained in the proposals and habitats. In addition to being listed in the national Biodiversity Action Plan as construction chapter of this ES. The impacts on ecology are assessed by (a) priority species, rare or threatened species may be listed in Red Data Books determining the level of importance/sensitivity of the receptor, for example (RDB) as categories 1 – 4; critically endangered, endangered, vulnerable and national, county, or local; (b) determining the type, magnitude and timescale of extinct. the impact; and then (c) using this information on the receptor and impact to determine the level, or weight, of the impact: described as very high, high, 10.12 Features that are important at County or District level may be protected moderate, low or negligible. The impact level is then described for each affected by Structure Plan or Local Plan policies. Sites can also have local statutory ecological resource (receptor). Finally, an assessment is made of the significance designations as Local Nature Reserves (LNRs) or local non-statutory designations of the impact. For example, a moderate or low impact on an internationally such as the County Wildlife Sites (CWSs) in Hampshire. Local and UK Biodiversity important feature is likely to be significant, while a similar impact on a feature of Action Plan priority habitats and species have also been identified for the area. local value is less likely to be significant. This is illustrated graphically in Table 10.1. 10.13 Features that are important at a local level may be of particular value in the context of the site itself. Local non-designated sites may also be of 10.8 Development on the site would occur in three phases: site clearance, importance to local people. construction, and operation. Impacts are described for these different phases of the development. Habitat creation is considered as part of the later stage of the 10.14 Habitats that are not included in protected sites or listed in Biodiversity construction phase. Action Plans may still be of value for nature conservation. This value may rest in the biological diversity of species or the potential of the habitat to support 142 Laverstoke Mill Environmental Statement Chapter Ten : Ecology protected species or species of nature conservation concern. Where a habitat 1996]). Habitats can be affected directly through loss or physical damage or has value for nature conservation, an impact resulting in a permanent reduction in creation of new habitat, or indirectly through pollution or effects of management. the habitat area for which no compensation is possible, or resulting in permanent Similarly, direct impacts on species could include killing or injury, and indirect damage to the site, could be significant. impacts could include pollution or physical disturbance of their habitat which reduces the value of an area to them without effectively excluding them from it 10.15 Species that are not protected by legislation or listed as priorities in altogether. Biodiversity Action Plans are likely to be common and widespread. Impacts on the populations of these species are unlikely to be significant. However, individual 10.19 When assessing impacts on species the following premise is used: cases should be considered, particularly birds, some species of which are still although individuals of some species have legal protection, in general, it is the common but have undergone a significant decline in the last few years. A effect on a population rather than the effects on the individual organism that is common bird species listed in the National Biodiversity Action Plan as a ‘Species likely to be significant in nature conservation terms. of Conservation Concern’ may be given more consideration than one not on the list. Magnitude of Impact 10.16 Where features have been assigned values at more than one level, their 10.20 The magnitude of an impact may be an obvious measurement of, for importance should be taken at the highest level. For example, a site designated example, the area of a habitat to be lost. Even such obvious measurements must as an SAC and SSSI would be valued in any assessment as being of international be considered in context. The loss of 1 ha of an important habitat totalling 2 ha importance, reflecting its SAC designation, and any impacts assessed (i.e. 50%) is generally of greater concern than the loss of 1 ha out of 200 ha of accordingly. important habitat (i.e. 0.5%), even though the quantum of loss is the same. For Type of Impact species, unless more detailed information is available, magnitudes of impacts would be estimated based on the proportion of their habitat affected (English 10.17 Potential impacts of any development proposal on receptors fall into a Nature, 1994). variety of categories (DGXI, 1996). These may be: Determining the Level of Impacts • Positive or negative impacts; • Direct or indirect impacts; 10.21 Once the importance of the receptor and the type and magnitude of the • Permanent or temporary impacts (for this study, long term = over 25 years, predicted impact have been identified, the relative level of the impact can be medium term = 5 to 25 years, or short term = less than 5 years); determined. When assessing whether an impact could be significant, it is • Reversible or irreversible impacts; important to establish testable criteria for that assessment. An established set of • Certain or possible impacts. criteria has been used for the selection of SSSIs by the Nature Conservancy Council and its successors (Ratcliffe, 1977), based on measures of size, extent, 10.18 Impacts may be direct or indirect (i.e. not a direct result of the project, diversity, naturalness, rarity and fragility.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Water Beetles
    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chalk Rivers: Nature Conservation and Management
    Chalk rivers: nature conservation and management Item Type monograph Authors Mainstone, C.P. Publisher English Nature and Environment Agency Download date 03/10/2021 21:57:44 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/27247 C halk rivers nature conservation and m anagem ent Chalk rivers nature conservation and management March 1999 C P Mainstone Water Research Centre Produced on behalf of English Nature and the Environment Agency (English Nature contract number FIN/8.16/97-8) Chalk rivers - nature conservation and management Contributors: N T Holmes Alconbury Environmental Consultants - plants P D Armitage Institute of Freshwater Ecology - invertebrates A M Wilson, J H Marchant, K Evans British Trust for Ornithology - birds D Solomon - fish D Westlake - algae 2 Contents Background 8 1. Introduction 9 2. Environmental characteristics of chalk rivers 12 2.1 Characteristic hydrology 12 2.2 Structural development and definition of reference conditions for conservation management 12 2.3 Characteristic water properties 17 3. Characteristic wildlife communities of chalk rivers 20 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Higher plants 25 3.3 Algae 35 3.4 Invertebrates 40 3.5 Fish 47 3.6 Birds 53 3.7 Mammals 58 4. Habitat requirements of characteristic wildlife communities 59 4.1 Introduction 59 4.2 Higher plants 59 4.3 Invertebrates 64 4.4 Fish 70 4.5 Birds 73 4.6 Mammals 79 4.7 Summary of the ecological requirements of chalk river communities 80 5. Human activities and their impacts 83 5.1 The inherent vulnerability of chalk rivers 83 5.2 An inventory of activities and their links to ecological impact 83 5.3 Channel modifications and river/floodplain consequences 89 5.4 Low flows 92 5.5 Siltation 95 5.6 Nutrient enrichment 101 5.7 Hindrances to migration 109 5.8 Channel maintenance 109 5.9 Riparian management 115 5.10 Manipulation of fish populations 116 5.11 Bird species of management concern 119 5.12 Decline of the native crayfish 120 5.13 Commercial watercress beds as a habitat 121 5.14 Spread of non-native plant species 121 3 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biology and Management of the River Dee
    THEBIOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT OFTHE RIVERDEE INSTITUTEofTERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY NATURALENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COUNCIL á Natural Environment Research Council INSTITUTE OF TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY The biology and management of the River Dee Edited by DAVID JENKINS Banchory Research Station Hill of Brathens, Glassel BANCHORY Kincardineshire 2 Printed in Great Britain by The Lavenham Press Ltd, Lavenham, Suffolk NERC Copyright 1985 Published in 1985 by Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Administrative Headquarters Monks Wood Experimental Station Abbots Ripton HUNTINGDON PE17 2LS BRITISH LIBRARY CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATIONDATA The biology and management of the River Dee.—(ITE symposium, ISSN 0263-8614; no. 14) 1. Stream ecology—Scotland—Dee River 2. Dee, River (Grampian) I. Jenkins, D. (David), 1926– II. Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Ill. Series 574.526323'094124 OH141 ISBN 0 904282 88 0 COVER ILLUSTRATION River Dee west from Invercauld, with the high corries and plateau of 1196 m (3924 ft) Beinn a'Bhuird in the background marking the watershed boundary (Photograph N Picozzi) The centre pages illustrate part of Grampian Region showing the water shed of the River Dee. Acknowledgements All the papers were typed by Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs E J P Allen, ITE Banchory. Considerable help during the symposium was received from Dr N G Bayfield, Mr J W H Conroy and Mr A D Littlejohn. Mrs L M Burnett and Mrs J Jenkins helped with the organization of the symposium. Mrs J King checked all the references and Mrs P A Ward helped with the final editing and proof reading. The photographs were selected by Mr N Picozzi. The symposium was planned by a steering committee composed of Dr D Jenkins (ITE), Dr P S Maitland (ITE), Mr W M Shearer (DAES) and Mr J A Forster (NCC).
    [Show full text]
  • World Catalogue of Haliplidae – Corrections and Additions, 2 (HALIPLIDAE) 25
    ©Wiener Coleopterologenverein (WCV), download unter www.biologiezentrum.at 22 Koleopt. Rdsch. 83 (2013) Koleopterologische Rundschau 83 23–34 Wien, September 2013 Laccophilus sordidus SHARP, 1882 First record from Iran. This is the most northern limit of the distribution of the species. It was World Catalogue of Haliplidae – previously known from Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. corrections and additions, 2 Acknowledgements (Coleoptera: Haliplidae) We are grateful to Dr. H. Fery (Berlin) for his help with identification of some specimens and B.J. van VONDEL Dr. J. Hájek (Prague) for his help with literature. The deputy of research, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz is thanked for financial support of Abstract the project (# 101). A second series of corrections and additions to the World Catalogue of Haliplidae (Coleoptera) published as part of Volume 7 of the World Catalogue of insect series (VONDEL 2005) are presented. References All new taxa, new synonymies and new data on distribution are summarized. The number of species of the family Haliplidae is now 240, distributed in five genera. DARILMAZ, M.C., İNCEKARA, Ü. & VAFAEI, R. 2013: Contribution to the knowledge of Iranian Aquatic Adephaga (Coleoptera). – Spixiana 36 (1): 149–152. Key words: Coleoptera, Haliplidae, World Catalogue, additions, corrections. FERY, H. & HOSSEINIE, S.O. 1998: A taxonomic revision of Deronectes Sharp, 1882 (Insecta: Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) (part II). – Annalen des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien B 100: 219–290. Introduction FERY, H., PEŠIĆ, V. & DARVISHZADEH, I. 2012: Faunistic notes on some Hydradephaga from the Khuzestan, Hormozgan and Sistan & Baluchestan provinces in Iran, with descriptive notes on the The World Catalogue of the beetle family Haliplidae (VONDEL 2005) was published on June 24, female of Glareadessus franzi Wewalka & Biström 1998 (Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Noteridae).
    [Show full text]
  • A Manual for the Survey and Evaluation of the Aquatic Plant and Invertebrate Assemblages of Grazing Marsh Ditch Systems
    A manual for the survey and evaluation of the aquatic plant and invertebrate assemblages of grazing marsh ditch systems Version 6 Margaret Palmer Martin Drake Nick Stewart May 2013 Contents Page Summary 3 1. Introduction 4 2. A standard method for the field survey of ditch flora 5 2.1 Field survey procedure 5 2.2 Access and licenses 6 2.3 Guidance for completing the recording form 6 Field recording form for ditch vegetation survey 10 3. A standard method for the field survey of aquatic macro- invertebrates in ditches 12 3.1 Number of ditches to be surveyed 12 3.2 Timing of survey 12 3.3 Access and licences 12 3.4 Equipment 13 3.5 Sampling procedure 13 3.6 Taxonomic groups to be recorded 15 3.7 Recording in the field 17 3.8 Laboratory procedure 17 Field recording form for ditch invertebrate survey 18 4. A system for the evaluation and ranking of the aquatic plant and macro-invertebrate assemblages of grazing marsh ditches 19 4.1 Background 19 4.2 Species check lists 19 4.3 Salinity tolerance 20 4.4 Species conservation status categories 21 4.5 The scoring system 23 4.6 Applying the scoring system 26 4.7 Testing the scoring system 28 4.8 Conclusion 30 Table 1 Check list and scoring system for target native aquatic plants of ditches in England and Wales 31 Table 2 Check list and scoring system for target native aquatic invertebrates of grazing marsh ditches in England and Wales 40 Table 3 Some common plants of ditch banks that indicate salinity 50 Table 4 Aquatic vascular plants used as indicators of good habitat quality 51 Table 5a Introduced aquatic vascular plants 53 Table 5a Introduced aquatic invertebrates 54 Figure 1 Map of Environment Agency regions 55 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Rivpacs in the Uk and the Value of the Underlying Data-Base
    DEVELOPMENT OF RIVPACS IN THE UK AND THE VALUE OF THE UNDERLYING DATA-BASE John F. Wright Institute of Freshwater Ecology. River Laboratory. East Stoke, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 6BB ENGLAND INTRODUCTION In the late 1970's biologists employed within the Water Industry focused much of their attention on the detection RIVPACS stands for River Jnyertebrate Prediction And of organic pollution. Typically, this was reported to mana- Classification- System, a technique developed by the Insti- gers using the Trent Biotic Index (WOODIWISS, 1964) or tute of Freshwater Ecology (IFE) Sor evaluating the biolo- Chandler score (CHANDLER, 1970). Although these ap- gical quality of rivers. The project which eventually lead proaches were effective at identifying badly polluted sec- to RIVPACS started in October 1977, when a small group tions of river which required immediate attention, they to- of invertebrate zoologists were brought together to deve- ok no account of the macroinvertebrates to be expected at lop more sophisticated approaches to the detection of po- the site in the absence of major environmental stress. llution and environmental stress using biological informa- Clearly, the fauna will vary according to the physical and tion. chemical characteristics of the site and the location of the Chemical assessments of water quality have always be- site along the length of the water course. This is the essen- en an essential element in the protection of rivers, particu- ce of the problem. For the biological approach based on larly when water is required for human consumption. But the structure of the invertebrate assemblage to be realistic chemical monitoring alone tells us little of the effects of and flexible, a procedure is required Sor determining the pollution, which is essentially a biological phenomenon in macroinvertebrates to be expected at any given site in the so far as its effects are on living organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 and Appendices
    Contents Page Section 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Biodiversity action in Orkney – general outline of the Plan 6 1.2 Biodiversity Action Planning - the international and national contexts 6 • The Scottish Biodiversity Strategy 1.3 Recent developments in environmental legislation 8 • The Marine (Scotland) Act 2010 • The Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011 • The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 1.4 Biodiversity and the Local Authority Planning System 12 • The Orkney Local Development Plan 2012-2017 1.5 Community Planning 13 1.6 River Basin Management Planning 13 1.7 Biodiversity and rural development policy 14 • The Common Agricultural Policy • Scotland Rural Development Programme 2007-2013 1.8 Other relevant national publications 15 • Scotland’s Climate Change Adaptation Framework • Scotland’s Land Use Strategy • The Scottish Soil Framework 1.9 Links with the Orkney Biodiversity Records Centre 16 Section 2 Selection of the Ten Habitats for Inclusion in the Orkney Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 17 1 • Lowland fens 19 2 • Basin bog 27 3 • Eutrophic standing waters 33 4 • Mesotrophic lochs 41 5 • Ponds and milldams 47 6 • Burns and canalized burns 53 7 • Coastal sand dunes and links 60 8 • Aeolianite 70 9 • Coastal vegetated shingle 74 10 • Intertidal Underboulder Communities 80 Appendix I Species considered to be of conservation concern in Orkney Appendix II BAP habitats found in Orkney Appendix III The Aichi targets and goals 3 Orkney Local Biodiversity Action Plan 2013-2016 Section 1 – Introduction What is biodiversity? a) Consider natural systems – by using The term ‘biodiversity’ means, quite simply, knowledge of interactions in nature and how the variety of species and genetic varieties ecosystems function.
    [Show full text]
  • Die Pygidialdrüse Der Wassertreter (Coleo- Ptera: Haliplidae): Morphologie, Chemie, Funktion Und Phylogenetische Bedeutung
    Die Pygidialdrüse der Wassertreter (Coleo- ptera: Haliplidae): Morphologie, Chemie, Funktion und phylogenetische Bedeutung Konrad Dettner & Marion böhner abstraCt Contrib. Nat. Hist. 12: 437–460. the pygidial gland of Crawling Water beetles (Coleoptera: Haliplidae): Morphology, Chemistry, Function and Phylogenetic significance. – the minute paired abdominal pygidial glands of crawling water beetles (Coleoptera: Haliplidae) were analyzed morphologically and chemically by prechromatographic derivatizations. apart from the already known phenylacetic acid (3) in Peltodytes caesus, P. rotundatus, Bry- chius elevatus, Haliplus (Neohaliplus) lineatocollis, Haliplus (Haliplus) ruficol- lis, H. (Haliplus) heydeni, Haliplus (Liaphlus) fulvus, H. (Liaphlus) flavicollis, and H. (Liaphlus) laminatus the following antimicrobic and the body surface wetting compounds were analyzed for the first time: 3-hydroxyoctan- (1) and 3-hydroxydeca- noic acids (2), 4-hydroxy- (4) and 3-hydroxyphenylacetic acids (6), phenyllactic acid (5) and benzoic acid (7). Especially by regarding the glandular tissue, the collecting channel, and the gland reservoir a phylogenetic arrangement of the taxa Brychius, the subgenus Neohaliplus and the remaining representatives of the genus Haliplus indicates that they represent a monophylum with Peltodytes and Neohaliplus as primitive representatives. in contrast the gland morphology of both Peltodytes rep- resentatives resembles the Geadephaga whereas the subgenera Liaphlus and Hali- plus are mostly derived. KURZFASSUNG Die winzigen,
    [Show full text]
  • Water Beetles As Models in Ecology and Evolution
    EN64CH20_Bilton ARI 25 November 2018 14:38 Annual Review of Entomology Water Beetles as Models in Ecology and Evolution 1, 2 David T. Bilton, ∗ Ignacio Ribera, and Andrew Edward Z. Short3 1Marine Biology and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom; email: d.bilton@plymouth.ac.uk 2Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Pompeu Fabra University), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; email: ignacio.ribera@ibe.upf-csic.es 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology; and Division of Entomology, Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, USA; email: aezshort@ku.edu Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019. 64:359–77 Keywords The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Coleoptera, habitat shifts, model organisms, biogeography, sexual ento.annualreviews.org selection, indicator taxa https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011118- 111829 Abstract Copyright c 2019 by Annual Reviews. ⃝ Beetles have colonized water many times during their history, with some of All rights reserved these events involving extensive evolutionary radiations and multiple transi- Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2019.64:359-377. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org ∗Corresponding author tions between land and water. With over 13,000 described species, they are one of the most diverse macroinvertebrate groups in most nonmarine aquatic habitats and occur on all continents except Antarctica. A combination of wide geographical and ecological range and relatively accessible taxonomy makes Access provided by CSIC - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas on 01/11/19. For personal use only. these insects an excellent model system for addressing a variety of ques- tions in ecology and evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomy, Classification, Reconstructed Phylogeny
    TAXONOMY, CLASSIFICATION, RECONSTRUCTED PHYLOGENY, BIOGEOGRAPHY, AND NATURAL HISTORY OF NEARCTIC SPECIES OF BRYC HIU S THOMSON (COLEOPTERA: HALIPLIDAE) By TONYA MOUSSEAU A thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Entomology University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2 O Tonya Mousseau 2004 THE UNTVERSITY OF MANITOBA FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ***** COPYRIGHT PERMISSION PAGE TAXONOMY, CLAS SIFICATION, RE C ONSTRUCTED PHYLO GEI\IY' BIOGEOGRAPITY, AND NATURAL HISTORY OF NEARCTIC SPECIES OF' BRYCHIUS THOMSON (COLEOPTERA: HALIPLIDAE) BY TONYA MOUSSEAU A Thesis/Practicum submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The Univercity of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE TONYA MOUSSEAU @ 2OO4 PermissÍon has been granted to the Library of The University of Manitoba to lend or sell copies of this thesis/practicum, to the National Library of Canada to microfilm this thesis and to lend or sell copies of the film, and to University Microfilm Inc. to publish an abstract of this thesis/practicum. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither this thesis/practicum nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's written permission. Brychius hornit Crotch Brychius hungerþrdi Spangler Brychius pacificus Carr Frontispiece Dedicated to my two loving grandfathers, Bernie Mousseau (Pépère) and William Both (Opa), who passed away during the time of this research. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, f express my gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Robert E. Roughley, for his continuous guidance throughout my M. Sc. program. I thank him for his patience, enthusiasm, advice, and honesty.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2, Chapter 11-9: Aquatic Insects: Holometabola-Coleoptera
    Glime, J. M. 2017. Aquatic Insects: Holometabola – Coleoptera, Suborder Adephaga. Chapt. 11-9. In: Glime, J. M. Bryophyte 11-9-1 Ecology. Volume 2. Bryological Interaction. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 19 July 2020 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology2/>. CHAPTER 11-9 AQUATIC INSECTS: HOLOMETABOLA – COLEOPTERA, SUBORDER ADEPHAGA TABLE OF CONTENTS COLEOPTERA BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................................... 11-9-2 Suborder Adephaga ........................................................................................................................................... 11-9-4 Carabidae – Ground Beetles....................................................................................................................... 11-9-4 Gyrinidae – Whirligig Beetles ................................................................................................................... 11-9-5 Haliplidae – Crawling Water Beetles ......................................................................................................... 11-9-5 Hygrobiidae – Squeak Beetles ................................................................................................................... 11-9-6 Dytiscidae – Predaceous Diving Beetles and Noteridae – Burrowing Water Beetles ................................ 11-9-6 Moors, Bogs, and Fens.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SYNTHESIS and PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE ANALYSES of the CAUSES and CONSEQUENCES of KARYOTYPE EVOLUTION in ARTHROPODS by HEATH B
    SYNTHESIS AND PHYLOGENETIC COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF THE CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF KARYOTYPE EVOLUTION IN ARTHROPODS by HEATH BLACKMON Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Arlington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON May 2015 Copyright © by Heath Blackmon 2015 All Rights Reserved ii Acknowledgements I owe a great debt of gratitude to my advisor professor Jeffery Demuth. The example that he has set has shaped the type of scientist that I strive to be. Jeff has given me tremendous intelectual freedom to develop my own research interests and has been a source of sage advice both scientific and personal. I also appreciate the guidance, insight, and encouragement of professors Esther Betrán, Paul Chippindale, John Fondon, and Matthew Fujita. I have been fortunate to have an extended group of collaborators including professors Doris Bachtrog, Nate Hardy, Mark Kirkpatrick, Laura Ross, and members of the Tree of Sex Consortium who have provided opportunities and encouragement over the last five years. Three chapters of this dissertation were the result of collaborative work. My collaborators on Chapter 1 were Laura Ross and Doris Bachtrog; both were involved in data collection and writing. My collaborators for Chapters 4 and 5 were Laura Ross (data collection, analysis, and writing) and Nate Hardy (tree inference and writing). I am also grateful for the group of graduate students that have helped me in this phase of my education. I was fortunate to share an office for four years with Eric Watson.
    [Show full text]