9/27/2015
The Pratt & Whitney PurePower® Geared Turbofan™ Engine
Alan Epstein VP, Technology and Environment Pratt & Whitney
Academie de l’Air et de l’Espace Paris, September 2015
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 1
Overview The Development of the Geared TurbofanTM Engine
• Some historical perspective • A recurrent theme - conventional wisdom vs. reality • The roles of architecture, design, and technology • Speculation on the future
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 2
1 9/27/2015
PurePower® Geared Turbofan™ Engine
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 3
Why History?
“There is nothing new in the world except the history you do not know.” Harry S. Truman
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 4
2 9/27/2015
Pratt & Whitney – Dependable Engines
Wasp Pic
Wasp Engine Turbofan Engine 1925 2015
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 5
Eras of Engine Architecture
Single Spool Dual Spool Turbojet High Bypass Turbofan Ultra-High Bypass (1937) (1951) (1969) Geared Turbofan (2015)
>10% STEPS IN EFFICIENCY OVERALL EFFICIENCY EFFICIENCY OVERALL
1940 1960 1980 2000 2020
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 6
3 9/27/2015
Geared Turbofan Technology Demonstrators Over 50 years of interest Hamilton Standard General Electric Lycoming ALF502 4 5 Pratt & Whitney PW304, 1957 Q-Fan, 19722 QCSEE, 1977 1980
1960 1970 1980 1990
Turbomeca Astafan Variable Garrett TFE731 Rolls Royce Dowty Pratt & Whitney 1 Pitch Fan, 1969 19705 M45SD-02, 19753 ADP X-Engine, 1992 Image Credits 1 Johan Visschedijk Collection 2 Schaefer, et al, NASA, 1977 3 Simon JP O’Riordan 4 NASA 5 Wikimedia Commons © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 7
P&W Hydrogen Fueled Aircraft Engine
Project Suntan – Liquid H2 engine circa 1957-58
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 8
4 9/27/2015
Geared Turbofan Technology Demonstrators Variable pitch fans Hamilton Standard General Electric Q-Fan, 19722 QCSEE, 19774
1960 1970 1980 1990
Turbomeca Astafan Variable Rolls Royce Dowty Pratt & Whitney 1 Pitch Fan, 1969 M45SD-02, 19753 ADP X-Engine, 1992
Image Credits 1 Johan Visschedijk Collection 2 Schaefer, et al, NASA, 1977 3 Simon JP O’Riordan 4 NASA © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 9
Turbofan Conversion Geared Engines Turboprops/shaft transformed into high FPR turbofans
Garrett TFE731 1970
1960 1970 1980 1990
Lycoming ALF502 1980 Image Credits Wikipedia commons FPR = fan pressure ratio © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 10
5 9/27/2015
$1B Technology Investment 25 years of research prior to product launch
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 11
Challenging Conventional Wisdom Conventional wisdom - areas of general consensus
• Gears – too heavy, too much heat to reject, short-lived
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 12
6 9/27/2015
GTF™ Engine Architecture for the 21st Century
Conventional Engine Higher Efficiency, Lower Noise
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 13
GTF™ Engine Architecture for the 21st Century
Turning Vision
Conventional Engine Higher Efficiency, Lower Noise
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 14
7 9/27/2015
GTF™ Engine Architecture for the 21st Century
Into Reality
Conventional Engine Higher Efficiency, Lower Noise
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 15
Fan Drive Gear System 25 years of technology development
Efficient: >99.5%
Simple: 13 major parts
Reliable: 20 years before maintenance
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 16
8 9/27/2015
Three Interlocking Enabling Technologies Enable step change in propulsor performance
Very Light Weight Light Weight Advanced Reliable Gear Extra Efficient Fan Nacelle 2 + 2 + 2 = 16% Improvement in Fuel Burn
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 17
Challenging Conventional Wisdom Conventional wisdom - areas of general consensus
• Gears – too heavy, too much heat to reject, short lived • Low FPR Fans – need variable pitch or variable nozzle
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 18
9 9/27/2015
Low Fan Pressure Ratio Needs a Variable Area Nozzle A widely accepted view
“Fan pressure ratios at cruise significantly lower than, say, 1.45 will probably have to wait until variable nozzles for the bypass stream become available or acceptable, a point that has been recognized in the industry for some time.
In other words, the variable area nozzle is an enabling technology for lower fan pressure ratio.” *
*Cumpsty, N.A., Journal of Turbomachinery, Oct 2010 © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 19
Low Fan Pressure Ratio Needs a Variable Area Nozzle
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 20
10 9/27/2015
PW1100G-JM / A320neo Nacelle
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 21
Challenging Conventional Wisdom Conventional wisdom - areas of general consensus
• Gears – too heavy, too much heat to reject, short lived • Low FPR Fans – need variable pitch or variable nozzle • Nacelles – too large in diameter, too much drag
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 22
11 9/27/2015
Low Noise Fans Enable Short Inlets Less noise produced less acoustic treatment needed
Legacy GTF Inlet L/D~1 Inlet L/D ~0.5-0.6
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 23
Engine Diameter Grows as Length Shrinks 35,000 lbs thrust (today) versus 47,000 lbs (1976)
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 24
12 9/27/2015
A Challenge to Retrofit a Much Larger Engine
Image courtesy of JetBlue © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 25
Challenging Conventional Wisdom Conventional wisdom - areas of general consensus
• Gears – too heavy, too much heat to reject, short lived • Low FPR Fans – need variable pitch or variable nozzle • Nacelles – too large in diameter, too much drag • Composite blades are a superior, lighter solution
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 26
13 9/27/2015
Hybrid Metallic Fan Blade Disciplined approach surprised conventional wisdom
Solid TiSolid Ti Hollow Ti Hybrid Metallic
1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
Fiber reinforced 2D Composite 3D Woven Fiber reinforced Composite © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 27
Advanced Fan Blade Very high efficiency, very low noise
Bird Strike Resistant
Superior Aerodynamics Hybrid-Metallic 1% Better Fuel Burn Construction
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 28
14 9/27/2015
Challenging Conventional Wisdom Conventional wisdom - areas of general consensus
• Gears – too heavy, too much heat to reject, short lived • Low FPR Fans – need variable pitch or variable nozzle • Nacelles – too large in diameter, too much drag • Composite blades are a superior solution • Low emissions requires lean burn combustors
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 29
TALON™ X Rich Burn Quick Quench Combustor Best in class emissions and performance
Blow out free 3rd Generation RQL aero World-class emissions and smoke levels Highly durable float wall construction 3rd Gen combustor alloys for oxidation Compact, lightweight configuration No complicated fuel nozzles or staging Optimized exit profile temperatures emissions X
>40% Margin to CAEP/8 NO -35% to -40%
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 30
15 9/27/2015
Challenging Conventional Wisdom Conventional wisdom - areas of general consensus
• Gears – too heavy, too much heat to reject, short lived • Low FPR Fans – need variable pitch or variable nozzle • Nacelles – too large in diameter, too much drag • Modern fans must use composite blades • Low emissions requires lean burn combustors • Higher pressure ratio core compressors are superior
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 31
Architecture and Spool Pressure Ratio Engine architecture sets optimum low-high split
10
9 3-Spool
8 8 50/50 7 2-Spool Geared 6 6
50 5 40 30 4 4 2-Spool Pressure Ratio Pressure
3
2 2
Fan+Low Pressure Compressor Fan+Low Compressor Pressure 1 412462 68 810 10 12 14 1614 1618 1820 20 222 High Pressure Compressor Pressure Ratio
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 32
16 9/27/2015
Same Overall Pressure Ratio (OPR) Geared vs. direct drive different split among spools
450 1300 140 400
PW1000G geared turbofan engine
Two Spool engine
600 1350 220 2100 45% fewer airfoils – 6 fewer stages
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 33
High Speed Low Pressure Turbine Higher speed improves efficiency and drops weights
Gear Enables High Speed LPT Higher Efficiency Lower Stage Count >1700 fewer Airfoils Lower Weight Smaller Diameter and Length Better installation, lower airframe weight Lower Maintenance Cost
LPT efficiency trades 1:1 for fuel efficiency (fuel burn)
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 34
17 9/27/2015
Cores Shrink as Efficiency Improves
0.90.9 1.2 Relative Core Size, 1974=1 0.80.8 1 0.7
0.60.6 0.8
0.5 0.6 0.4 Efficiency 0.4
0.3 0.4
0.20.2 Core Size 0.2 0.1 at constant thrust 0 0 0 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Year of Introduction lines are curve fits to data
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 35
Cores Shrink as Efficiency Improves For similar missions
JT8D V2524 PW1524G
1964/1980 1995 2016 14,000/21,700 lbf 24,800 lbf 24,000 lbf
Pratt & Whitney Proprietary This page contains no technical data subject to the EAR or the ITAR 36
18 9/27/2015
PurePower® Geared Turbofan™ Engine New technologies realized Composite fan case High efficiency advanced HPT • advanced aerodynamics Very high bypass, • advanced sealing / cooling TALON® X light weight fan • durability technologies combustor
Fan Drive 2/3-stage, Advanced technology HPC Gear System high-speed 3-stage, • 8-stage design (FDGS) LPC high-speed • advanced aerodynamics LPT
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 37
Challenging Conventional Wisdom Conventional wisdom - areas of general consensus
• Gears – too heavy, too much heat to reject, short lived • Low FPR Fans – need variable pitch or variable nozzle • Nacelles – too large in diameter, too much drag • Modern fans must use composite blades • Low emissions requires lean burn combustors • Higher pressure ratio core compressors are superior • Larger diameter, low FPR geared engines may have lower TSFC but will have higher fuel burn due to weight & drag penalties
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 38
19 9/27/2015
Conventional Propulsion System Fundamentals Trading fuel burn against noise
High
Fuel Burn Noise
Better Direct Drive lower noise Turbofan
Geared Turbofan better fuel burn (GTF) engine Low Low Bypass Ratio Fan Diameter High Bypass Ratio Higher Fan Pressure Ratio Lower Fan Pressure Ratio
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 39
Dramatic Reduction in Community Noise 73% reduction in noise footprint – Paris CDG
Existing turbofan PurePower® PW1000G Engine
Source: Wyle Labs Existing turbofan: 75 dB contour = 104.4 sq km PW1000G engine: 75 dB contour = 28.7 sq km © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 40
20 9/27/2015
Evolution of Turbofan Engine Noise Jet noise no longer predominates
Compressor Compressor
Compressor Fan Jet Fan Turbine and Combustor Turbine and Turbine and Combustor Jet Combustor Jet
1960’s engine 1990’s engine 2015 engine 1:1 BPR 6~8:1 BPR 12:1 BPR
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 41
Engine Models • PW1100G‐JM A319neo A320neo A321neo 81” PW1124G‐JM PW1127G‐JM PW1133G‐JM Airbus A320neo 24,000 lbs 27,000 lbs 33,000 lbs PW1200G 56” MRJ70 MRJ90 PW1215G PW1217G Mitsubishi Regional Jet 15,000 lbs 17,000 lbs PW1400G MC‐21‐200 MC‐21‐300 81” PW1428G PW1431G Irkut MC‐21 28,000 lbs 31,000 lbs PW1500G CS100 CS100 CS300 73” PW1519G PW1521G PW1524G Bombardier CSeries 19,000 lbs 21,000 lbs 24,000 lbs PW1700G / PW1900G 56” E175‐E2 E190/195‐E2 PW1700G PW1900G 73” Embraer E‐Jets E2 up to 17,000 lbs up to 22,000 lbs © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 42
21 9/27/2015
7,000 Orders & Commitments
Embraer E‐Jets E2
Mitsubishi Regional Jet
Irkut MC‐21 Rostekhnologii
Odyssey Airlines
Bombardier C Series SaudiGulf
Airbus A320neo © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 43
Successfully Completing Milestones 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 20162017 2018 •
FETT First EIS Bombardier C Series Flight
FETT First EIS Mitsubishi Regional Jet Flight
FETT First EIS Airbus A320neo Flight
FETT First EIS Irkut MC‐21 Flight
FETT First EIS Embraer E‐Jets E2 Flight © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 44
22 9/27/2015
The Future Semi-informed speculation
• What will be future engine requirements?
• What will the engines of the future look like?
• What technologies are needed?
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 45
Evolution of Jet Engine Efficiency
0.8 Overall Efficiency
0.7 40% Ultra-high A380 Ultra-high 30% B-777 B-787 BPRBPR 0.6 B-777 B-747 20% 0.5 TurbojetsTurbojets HighHigh BPR BPR
0.4 10% Low BPR BPR B-707 B-727
Core Thermal Efficiency 0.3
Whittle 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 Propulsive x Transmission Efficiency © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 46
23 9/27/2015
Change in Bypass Ratio, Efficiency
In Service 2013-16 Longer Term BPR 5 BPR ~12 BPR 15~18 Fuel Burn Reference -15% -20~30%
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 47
Fan Pressure Ratios Must Drop So inlets must shorten
2020+
2015
Legacy
Image credit: NASA © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 48
24 9/27/2015
One Advanced Concept, the LRU Core Solving design challenges, reducing maintenance
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 49
Airplanes of the Future? Future airplane is unclear, future motor is not
Source: ATAG © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 50
25 9/27/2015
1:11 Scale D8 Aircraft
Source: E. Greitzer MIT © 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 51
Innovation in Energy – Solar Powered Airplanes
Sustainable Drop-In Biofuels for Reduced CO2
CO2
CmHn Conventional Fuel Bio Fuel
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 52
26 9/27/2015
Summary The future of commercial aviation • Gas turbines are the future of commercial aviation – Most efficient engines on the planet – Most reliable – Lowest emissions – Lowest cost of ownership
• Geared, Ultra-high bypass ratio will dominate • Conventional wisdom vs. technical reality – Conventional wisdom based on “all else being equal” – History suggests that it rarely is
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 53
© 2015 United Technologies Corporation This document has been publicly released 54
27