DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report Filed by Wayne Mccrory, Rpbio, to Federal Review Panel On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Report Filed by Wayne Mccrory, Rpbio, to Federal Review Panel On McCRORY WILDLIFE SERVICES LTD. RESPONSE TO 2011 TERRESTRIAL-WILDLIFE COMPONENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) & ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED NEW PROSPERITY GOLD-COPPER MINE PROJECT AT TEZTAN BINY (FISH LAKE) WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE GRIZZLY BEAR [With added comments on Northwestern Toad & Wild Horses] Report for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the CEAA Panel CEAR reference number 782 August 14, 2013 version Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services 208 Laktin Road, New Denver, British Columbia, V0G 1S1 Phone (250) 358-7796 email:[email protected] 2 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS & DISCLAIMER INFORMATION Professional background & relevant qualifications This report was prepared by me, bear biologist Wayne McCrory, for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the federal CEAA Panel reviewing the New Prosperity mine proposal in the BC Chilcotin. I am a registered professional bear biologist in the province of British Columbia. I have an Honours Zoology degree from the University of British Columbia (1966) and have more than 40 years professional experience. My wildlife and extensive bear work has been published in ten proceedings, peer-reviewed journals, and government publications. I have produced 80 professional reports, some peer-reviewed, many involving environmental impacts, and bear habitat and bear hazard assessments. I served for four years on the BC government’s Grizzly Bear Scientific Advisory Committee (GBSAC). Qualifications relevant to my review of the New Prosperity 2011 EIS include the following. I have had extensive experience in environmental impact assessment involving a diverse array of developments, including impacts of logging on grizzly bears, caribou surveys in the Yukon related to the Gas Arctic Pipeline, impacts of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline road, impacts of the Syncrude Tar Sands development on waterfowl and other wildlife, and others. I have also done extensive grizzly bear habitat surveys in at least 15 provincial and national parks, including extensive habitat mapping and ground-truthing of several types of habitat map modeling. I also have had extensive research experience in the BC Cariboo-Chilcotin, including an environmental impact study on wildlife for the proposed Moran Dam, an environmental impact study for the Toosey Indian Band of the effects of military exercises on the Chilcotin DND military block, bufflehead duck surveys for the Canadian Wildlife Service, two Aboriginal Species-at-Risk studies (ASFAR), including grizzly bears in the New Prosperity Regional Study Area (RSA and beyond, a biological assessment of the Brittany Triangle, a DNA study of wild horses of the Brittany with Texas A & M University, and for the Xeni Gwet’in First Nation, I have been involved in studies including wildlife tourism, grizzly bear viewing, climate change, and access management. Disclaimer The findings contained in this report were compiled from on-site field investigations of grizzly bear habitat values in the Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) study area; reviews of all available studies and information on grizzly bear habitats, population numbers, mortality, grizzly bear salmon and trout feeding areas, and conservation status in the Fish Lake study area and BC Chilcotin. The scientific literature was reviewed for all relevant materials. The author has also relied on anecdotal information, traditional knowledge of grizzly bears from Xeni Gwet’in wildlife researchers, and my own independent professional interpretation of the literature. I feel I have provided an accurate and authoritative analysis with regard to the subject matter covered herein. The conclusions and summation expressed herein are entirely my own and have not been subjected to outside peer review. I take full responsibility for any errors or omissions on my part but not on the part of errors or omissions extant in the data provided by outside sources. While best efforts have been made to ensure the validity of this review, no liability is assumed with respect to the use or application of the information contained herein. 3 LEGAL COVENANT FROM THE XENI GWET’IN GOVERNMENT The Tsilhqot'in have met the test for aboriginal title in the lands described in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007 BCSC 1700 (“Tsilhqot’in Nation”). Tsilhqot’in Nation also recognized the Tsilhqot’in aboriginal right to hunt and trap birds and animals for the purposes of securing animals for work and transportation, food, clothing, shelter, mats, blankets, and crafts, as well as for spiritual, ceremonial, and cultural uses throughout the Brittany Triangle (Tachelach’ed) and the Xeni Gwet’in Trapline. This right is inclusive of a right to capture and use horses for transportation and work. The Court found that the Tsilhqot’in people also have an aboriginal right to trade in skins and pelts as a means of securing a moderate livelihood. These lands are within the Tsilhqot'in traditional territory, the Xeni Gwet'in First Nation’s caretaking area, and partially in the Yunesit’in Government’s caretaking area. Nothing in this report shall abrogate or derogate from any aboriginal title or aboriginal rights of the Tsilhqot'in, the Xeni Gwet'in First Nation, or any Tsilhqot'in or Xeni Gwet'in members. Midnight: A Chilcotin grizzly bear on mark trail along salmon stream 4 SPECIAL NOTE ON ASSUMPTIONS OF STANDARDS FOR MINE-UPGRADE OF THE TASEKO/WHITEWATER/4500 MINE ROAD The proposed standards for the upgrade and re-routing of some of the Taseko/Whitewater/4500 road were important to my assessment of mortality risk to grizzly bears from traffic collisions. For example, I cite evidence from Apps et al. (2009) that the Duffy Lake Road (which is in the next GBPU south of the New Prosperity location) started as a logging road in about 1970, and was upgraded/paved in 1991 to become an extension of Highway 99. This transportation improvement is believed to have caused the extirpation of resident female grizzly bears north of the road. Since the new mine road standards, such as paved/unpaved, were not made available in the Prosperity EIS documents, I made a written request to Taseko in 2010 that went through the review panel but I never received a response. Nor were the road standards available in the 2011 EIS. On July 24, 2013, I again asked Taseko representatives at the New Prosperity hearings to provide the standards (paved or unpaved) of a new road upgrade. They were vague and said they could not say. In light of the fact that if the mine is approved, the road will be significantly upgraded to handle large-scale industrial traffic, I am making the assumption that the road will, in effect, become a paved highway some time during the 35-year life span of the mine and am calling it that for purposes of discussion in this document. The practice, now common, of identifying ‘critical habitat’ and classifying it into management situation categories is an approach that may help a few individual bears over the short-term, but, over the long-term, will surely violate the totality of resources and space necessary for population viability (Dr. J. Craighead 1995). 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................18 2.0 STUDY APPROACH ......................................................................................................18 2.1 Background review: Expanded review of the scientific literature on grizzly bears, including conservation status......................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Increased inventory of habitats, numbers, and movements of grizzly bears.................................. 19 2.2.1 Assessment of minimal numbers of grizzly bears that seasonally frequent the Fish Lake study area .......................................................................................................................... 19 2.2.2 Assessment of minimal grizzly bear numbers that annually frequent the mid-upper Taseko and Fish Lake mine area and the Chilcotin Grizzly Bear Population Unit (GBPU).....................................................................................................................19 2.2.3 Field surveys of grizzly bear habitats and their use in the Fish Lake study area.............. 19 2.2.4 Determination of grizzly bear/wildlife corridor movement values in the Fish Lake study area ......................................................................................................... 20 2.3 Assessment of Taseko Mine’s New Prosperity EIS (2011)........................................................... 20 3.0 RESULTS & DISCUSSION............................................................................................20 3.1 Part 1. Additional Grizzly Bear Baseline Inventory Information For The Teztan Biny (Fish Lake) Mine Study Area And The South Chilcotin Grizzly Bear Population Unit (GBPU) .................................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.1 Grizzly bear vulnerability and its value as an indicator species ....................................... 21 3.1.2 International, federal, & provincial conservation status of the South Chilcotin Ranges grizzly bear ....................................................................................................................... 22 3.1.2.1 International: International recognition of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Midcretaceous Thrusting in the Southern Coast Belt, British
    TECTONICS, VOL. 15, NO. 2, PAGES, 545-565, JUNE 1996 Mid-Cretaceous thrusting in the southern Coast Belt, British Columbia and Washington, after strike-slip fault reconstruction Paul J. Umhoefer Departmentof Geology,Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff Robert B. Miller Departmentof Geology, San JoseState University, San Jose,California Abstract. A major thrust systemof mid-Cretaceousage Introduction is presentalong much of the Coast Belt of northwestern. The Coast Belt in the northwestern Cordillera of North North America. Thrusting was concurrent,and spatially America containsthe roots of the largest Mesozoic mag- coincided,with emplacementof a great volume of arc intrusives and minor local strike-slip faulting. In the maticarc in North America, which is cut by a mid-Creta- southernCoast Belt (52ø to 47øN), thrusting was followed ceous,synmagmatic thrust system over muchof its length by major dextral-slipfaulting, which resultedin significant (Figure 1) [Rubin et al., 1990]. This thrust systemis translationalshuffling of the thrust system. In this paper, especiallywell definedin SE Alaska [Brew et al., 1989; Rubin et al., 1990; Gehrels et al., 1992; Haeussler, 1992; we restorethe displacementson major dextral-slipfaults of the southernCoast Belt and then analyze the mid-Creta- McClelland et al., 1992; Rubin and Saleeby,1992] and the southern Coast Belt of SW British Columbia and NW ceousthrust system. Two reconstructionswere madethat usedextral faulting on the Yalakom fault (115 km), Castle Washington(Figure 1)[Crickmay, 1930; Misch, 1966; Davis et al., 1978; Brown, 1987; Rusrnore aad Pass and Ross Lake faults (10 km), and Fraser fault (100 Woodsworth, 199 la, 1994; Miller and Paterson, 1992; km). The reconstructionsdiffer in the amount of dextral offset on the Straight Creek fault (160 and 100 km) and Journeayand Friedman, 1993; Schiarizza et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory of Wildlife, Ecological and Landscape Coonectivity Values
    INVENTORY OF WILDLIFE, ECOLOGICAL, AND LANDSCAPE CONNECTIVITY VALUES, TSILHQOT'IN FIRST NATIONS CULTURAL/HERITAGE VALUES, & RESOURCE CONFLICTS IN THE DASIQOX-TASEKO WATERSHED, BC CHILCOTIN FINAL REPORT (Revised) August 4, 2014 For Xeni Gwet’in & Yunesit’in First Nations By Wayne McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd. Phone: 250-358-7796; email: [email protected] and First Nations cultural/heritage research: Linda Smith, MSc, & Alice William GIS mapping by Baden Cross, Applied Conservation GIS Corridor modeling by Dr. Lance Craighead, Craighead Research Institute ii LEGAL COVENANT FROM THE XENI GWET’IN GOVERNMENT When the draft of this report was completed in March 2014, the following legal covenant was included: The Tsilhqot'in have met the test for aboriginal title in the lands described in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia 2007 BCSC 1700 (“Tsilhqot’in Nation”). Tsilhqot’in Nation (Vickers J, 2007) also recognized the Tsilhqot’in aboriginal right to hunt and trap birds and animals for the purposes of securing animals for work and transportation, food, clothing, shelter, mats, blankets, and crafts, as well as for spiritual, ceremonial, and cultural uses throughout the Brittany Triangle (Tachelach’ed) and the Xeni Gwet’in Trapline. This right is inclusive of a right to capture and use horses for transportation and work. The Court found that the Tsilhqot’in people also have an aboriginal right to trade in skins and pelts as a means of securing a moderate livelihood. These lands are within the Tsilhqot'in traditional territory, the Xeni Gwet'in First Nation’s caretaking area, and partially in the Yunesit’in Government’s caretaking area.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    BACKGROUND EPORT R March 2005 for Big Creek Provincial Park Spruce Lake Protected Area Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection Parks Division Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT HISTORY ................................................................................................................ 10 PARK ESTABLISHMENT AND LEGISLATION .............................................................................................................. 13 MANAGEMENT DIRECTION FROM LAND USE PLANS ................................................................................................ 13 NATURAL VALUES ................................................................................................................................................ 16 CLIMATE .................................................................................................................................................................. 16 PHYSIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................................................... 17 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................................ 18 SOILS ......................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CURRICULUM VITAE Wayne P. Mccrory, Registered Professional
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE Wayne P. McCrory, Registered Professional Biologist (R.P.Bio.) President, McCrory Wildlife Services Ltd. <personal information removed> August 3, 2012 (Last up-date) EDUCATION B.Sc. Honours Zoology, University of British Columbia, 1966. Course emphasis: Wildlife management. Honors thesis on sub-speciation of mountain goats (published), thesis advisor was Dr. Ian McTaggart-Cowan. PROFESSIONAL LICENCE Registered Professional Biologist (R.P.Bio.), British Columbia. Member #168 EXPERTISE Primarily a specialist in black bear and grizzly bear ecology, conservation, safety, bear risk assessments, bear-people conflict prevention plans, design and management of bear-viewing tourism programs, bear safety and bear aversion training, bear problem analysis and other aspects. However, a broad range of experience in wildlife research involving numerous birds and mammals including design of GIS habitat map projects, conservation area design, travel corridors/connectivity and environmental impacts/cumulative effects assessments. Teaches bear safety and bear safety courses. PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES Member, College of Applied Biology (Registered Professional Biologist (R.P.Bio.) Member and certified guide and trainer with the BC Commercial Bear Viewing Association (CBVA) Member of, and contributor to, the International Association for Bear Research and Management, also known as the International Bear Association (IBA). With members from some 50 countries, the organization supports the scientific management of bears through research and
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    McCRORY WILDLIFE SERVICES LTD. RESPONSE TO 2011 TERRESTRIAL-WILDLIFE COMPONENT OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) & ASSOCIATED DOCUMENTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED NEW PROSPERITY GOLD-COPPER MINE PROJECT AT TEZTAN BINY (FISH LAKE) WITH SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE GRIZZLY BEAR [With added comments on Northwestern Toad & Wild Horses] Report for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the CEAA Panel CEAR reference number 782 August 14, 2013 version Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services 2 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND AND QUALIFICATIONS & DISCLAIMER INFORMATION Professional background & relevant qualifications This report was prepared by me, bear biologist Wayne McCrory, for Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) for submission to the federal CEAA Panel reviewing the New Prosperity mine proposal in the BC Chilcotin. I am a registered professional bear biologist in the province of British Columbia. I have an Honours Zoology degree from the University of British Columbia (1966) and have more than 40 years professional experience. My wildlife and extensive bear work has been published in ten proceedings, peer-reviewed journals, and government publications. I have produced 80 professional reports, some peer-reviewed, many involving environmental impacts, and bear habitat and bear hazard assessments. I served for four years on the BC government’s Grizzly Bear Scientific Advisory Committee (GBSAC). Qualifications relevant to my review of the New Prosperity 2011 EIS include the following. I have had extensive experience in environmental impact assessment involving a diverse array of developments, including impacts of logging on grizzly bears, caribou surveys in the Yukon related to the Gas Arctic Pipeline, impacts of the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline road, impacts of the Syncrude Tar Sands development on waterfowl and other wildlife, and others.
    [Show full text]
  • Doug Wilson's
    Doug Wilson’s - Submission to the New Prosperity Mine Review 21 September 2012 Douglas W. Wilson September 21, 2012 Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 22nd Floor, Place Bell 160 Elgin Street Ottawa ON K1A 0H3 Dear Commission Re: Submission Regarding the New Prosperity Mine Project Although retired, as a long term resident of the Cariboo/Chilcotin Central Coast area of British Columbia I have a great interest in the economic opportunities that the development of the New Prosperity Mine would have within the Cariboo/Chilcotin Central Coast area of British Columbia. I see this mine development providing long term employment directly and indirectly for hundreds and possibly thousands. While I support the New Prosperity project, I believe it is our responsibility as Canadians to insure that such development meets and maintains stringent environmental standards. If these standards can be maintained and enforced, couple this with the actual record of Taseko Mines, and the Gibraltar/ McLeese Lake operation, in existence since the early 1970’s, Taseko Mines have shown great respect for the environment, and it is with this experience also coupled with Federal and Provincial environmental regulations that I support the development of the New Prosperity Mine Development. Regarding those that are against the development of this mine, I find the people called Xeni Gwet’in and the people called Chilcotin to be truly wonderful people with reasonable dreams and aspirations. It is cultural differences and community life styles where conflict seems to rest between dreams and aspirations. The world is in a continual state of change young Xeni Gwet’in and Chilcotin native people; in an increasing awareness of the things of the world are also having an increasing desire to have the things of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Failing B.C.'S Grizzlies
    FAILING B.C.’s GRIZZLIES REPORT CARD and RECOMMENDATIONS for Ensuring a Future for British Columbia’s Grizzly Bears FAILING B.C.’s GRIZZLIES: Report Card and Recommendations for Ensuring a Future for British Columbia’s Grizzly Bears By Jeff Gailus, M.Sc. On Behalf of the David Suzuki Foundation March 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author, Jeff Gailus, would like to thank the Sitka Foundation, Julie Glover, and the David Suzuki Foundation for its support and interest in pursuing Grizzly Bear conservation. For input and review, thanks to Wayne McRory, Kyle Artelle, and Dr. Chris Darimont. For support and input, thanks to Dr. Faisal Moola (University of Toronto), Dr. Clayton Apps, Dr. Bruce McLellan, Sylvia Dolson, Mara Kerry, Ian Hanington, Lisa Rockwell and Kiruthiha Kulendiren of the David Suzuki Foundation. ISBN 978-1-897375-60-0 Graphic design by Pete Tuepah and Nadene Rehnby handsonpublications.com Cover photo courtesy Szecska/Flickr Downloaded this report at davidsuzuki.org Suite 219, 2211 West 4th Avenue Vancouver, B.C. V6K 4S2 T: 604.732.4228 E: [email protected] www.davidsuzuki.org Contents PhOTO COURTESY SZECSKA/FLIckR ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................................... 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 5 HISTORY AND STATUS OF B.C.’s GRIZZLY BEARS ..................................................................... 7 PLANNING A HEALTHY FUTURE FOR
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Core Conservation Review of the Interior
    A PRELIMINARY CORE CONSERVATION REVIEW OF THE INTERIOR DRYLAND GRIZZLY BEAR OF CHILCOTIN RANGES IN BRITISH COLUMBIA. February 2011 Dr. Lance Craighead 1134 Holly Drive Bozeman, MT 59715 Ph.406-585-8705 e-mail: [email protected] Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services Box 479, New Denver, British Columbia, V0G 1S0 Phone (250) 358-7796 email:[email protected] Study for Valhalla Wilderness Society (VWS) and Friends of Nemaiah Valley (FONV) [With maps provided by: Baden Cross: GIS Analyst. Applied Conservation GIS] P.O. Box 354, Heriot Bay, B.C., Canada V0P 1H0. Ph: (250) 203-4003 e-mail: [email protected]] 2 [Cover photos: Xeni Gwet’in researchers mapping grizzly bear habitat and trail access on Konni Mtn., Nemiah Valley. Grizzly bear in travel corridor at Auger Lake, remote camera photo] LEGAL COVENANT FROM THE XENI GWET'IN GOVERNMENT The Tsilhqot'in have met the test for aboriginal title in the lands described in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, 2007 BCSC 1700 (“Tsilhqot’in Nation”). Tsilhqot’in Nation also recognized the Tsilhqot’in aboriginal right to hunt and trap birds and animals for the purposes of securing animals for work and transportation, food, clothing, shelter, mats, blankets and crafts, as well as for spiritual, ceremonial and cultural uses throughout the Brittany Triangle and the Xeni Gwet’in Trap line. This right is inclusive of a right to capture and use horses for transportation and work. The Court found that the Tsilhqot’in people also have an aboriginal right to trade in skins and pelts as a means of securing a moderate livelihood.
    [Show full text]
  • Grizzly Bear – Current Condition Report
    Howe Sound Cumulative Effects Project Grizzly Bear – Current Condition Report South Coast Natural Resource Region Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development November 22, 2018 Howe Sound Cumulative Effects Project – Grizzly Bear Current Condition Report Page ii Howe Sound Cumulative Effects Project – Grizzly Bear Current Condition Report Table of Contents Page Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………...........V 1. Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 2. Assessment Approach for Grizzly Bear …………………………………………………………………..3 3. Current Condition Assessment Results ………………………………..……………….……………...6 a) Population Status ............................................................................................ 9 b) Proportion Capable Secure Core Area ................................................................. 10 c) Mid-Seral Dense Conifer Forest Stands in Habitat ................................................... 11 d) Proportion of Front Country Area in Habitat ......................................................... 12 e) Average Annual Hunter Day Density in Habitat………………………………………….………….13 f) Mortality from Regulated Hunting………………………………………………….…………………14 4. Supplemental Information ................................................................................. 15 a) Sea-to-Sky LRMP Grizzly Bear Recovery Area ……………………………………………………….15 b) Grizzly Bear Density..…..………………………………………………………………………….……16 c) Habitat Capability
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Taseko's Eis Concerning Grizzly Bears
    AN INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT DOCUMENTS FOR THE PROSPERITY MINE [TERRESTRIAL/WILDLIFE COMPONENT] April 30 draft, 2010 (Maps to be added) Wayne P. McCrory, RPBio McCrory Wildlife Services Box 479, New Denver, British Columbia, V0G 1S0 Phone (250) 358-7796 email:[email protected] 2 REVIEW OF TASEKO’S EIS CONCERNING GRIZZLY BEARS, OTHER WILDLIFE, PLUS COMMENTS ON EFFECTS MINE DEVELOPMENT ON WILD HORSES & ECOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF PROTECTED AREAS [Note: This draft review is a revised copy of the original draft submitted to the panel on April 16. Considerable information has been added and some revisions made. Methods & approach & relevant maps are included in my April 29 Powerpoint Presentation to the Federal Panel, a digital copy of which was provided to the panel and will not be included in this technical background document to my Powerpoint. Wayne McCrory, RPBio.] COVENANT: My review partly focuses on the impacts of access. At the April 29 hearing, I requested of Taseko documentation of the current vehicle use of the Taseko/Whitewater Road of 50 return trips (= 100 vpd) but they were unable to quantify this or name the source. As well, when asked as to what standards Taseko would be up-grading the Taseko/Whitewater road they were unable to provide any information other than to state that this would be left to the BC Ministry of Transportation. I requested of the Panel that they consider the Taseko EIS deficient in this regards until this information is forthcoming. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY My review, using extensive local knowledge and research on wildlife habitats, 40 years of grizzly bear/wildlife expertise combined with a conservation biology and cumulative effects literature review including mine-grizzly bear case history studies, concludes that the Taseko EIS for the proposed Prosperity Mine significantly undervalues the environmental impacts of the mine development on grizzly bears and other wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Tk< Varsity Outdoor Club Journal
    Tk< Varsity Outdoor Club Journal VULUMC AAV lyOil ISSN 0524-5613 Tfo Umveuihj of fy&Uk Columbia Vancouver, Canada PRESIDENT STUDLY'S MESSAGE This year I've come across many names of old members of the past sixty years whose exploits in the mountains and elsewhere are well known. This is indicative of the vast history of the club, a history reflected in all aspects of club life, from the traditional trips to the Salty Dog Rag. This is the twenty-fifth year that the club has chosen to put down a part of that history in print and this issue should serve as a reminder to all members of the wealth of experiences inherent in the club. The journal however, as a permanent record of the club, is worthy of far more attention than it receives. This may be due partly to the character­ istic low profile that it has had with respect to both design and circulation. I hope therefore that the efforts and results of this year's journal committee set a standard to be repeated every year and not just every twenty- f i ve. This year, with almost three hundred members in the club, there has been a growth in popularity in the regular events as well as several exciting new projects. The rock school was a great success, with just under a hundred participants and much snow and ice expertise was passed on in three glacier schools. The highlights of the year though, were two slightly more tangible out­ lets of expertise and enthusiasm.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vita
    CURRICULUM VITA Dr. PAUL J. UMHOEFER Professor & Director School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ 86011-4099 phone (928) 523-6464; fax (928) 523-9220; [email protected]; http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~pju/ PERSONAL DATA Citizenship: U.S.A. EDUCATION University of Washington 1984/1989 Ph.D. Geology 1989 PH.D. DISSERTATION “Stratigraphy and tectonic setting of the upper Cadwallader terrane and overlying Relay Mountain Group, and the Cretaceous to Eocene structural evolution of the eastern Tyaughton basin, British Columbia; Advisor, Darrel Cowan University of California, Los Angeles 1982 Graduate course University of Southern California 1980/1981 Graduate courses University of Wisconsin - Madison 1977-1979 M.S. Geology 1979 University of Wisconsin - Madison 1973-1977 B.S. Geology 1977 PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYMENT - ACADEMIC Northern Arizona University 8/13-present Director, SESES Northern Arizona University 9/12-8/13 Interim Director, School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability (SESES) Northern Arizona University 8/07-present Professor Northern Arizona University 7/08-6/09 Interim Chair of Geology Northern Arizona University 8/02-8/07 Associate Professor Northern Arizona University 8/00-8/02 Assistant Professor Northern Arizona University 8/97-8/00 Visiting Assistant Professor Northern Arizona University 9/92-8/97 Research Associate Occidental College 1992; 1994 temporary Assistant Professor University of Minnesota 7/89-8/92 Research Associate, Instructor University of Minnesota
    [Show full text]