DOCSLIB.ORG

Consortium of Operative Dentistry Educators (CODE) REGIONAL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consortium of Operative Dentistry Educators (CODE) REGIONAL Consortium of Operative Dentistry Educators (CODE) REGIONAL REPORTS FALL 2014 Web site: http://www.unmc.edu/code 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreward......................................................................................................................................... 5 Origins of CODE ........................................................................................................................... 5 Organization Operation ................................................................................................................ 7 CODE Advisory Committee ......................................................................................................... 8 Regions and Schools ..................................................................................................................... 8 2014 Agenda .................................................................................................................................10 CODE Regional Meeting Report Form ........................................................................................15 CODE Regional Attendees Form .................................................................................................17 Regional Reports: Region I (Pacific) ..........................................................................................................18 Region II (Midwest) ......................................................................................................50 Region III (South Midwest) ..........................................................................................75 Region IV (Great Lakes) .............................................................................................104 Region V (Northeast) .................................................................................................136 Region VI (South) ......................................................................................................152 2 THE CODE 2014 REGIONAL REPORTS IN PDF FORMAT MAY BE FOUND ON THE WEBSITE: HTTP://WWW.UNMC.EDU/CODE PLEASE UPDATE YOUR SCHOOL’S DIRECTORY PAGE IN THE CODE NATIONAL DIRECTORY LOCATED ON THE CODE WEBSITE. TO ACCESS THE DIRECTORY, USE THE “PLEASE HELP UPDATE” LINK ON THE MAIN MENU OF THE WEBSITE. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE. On February 20, 2014, CODE held a National/International meeting during the annual meeting of the Academy of Operative Dentistry in Chicago. Dr. So Ran Kwon presented the program: Incorporation of Digital Technology in Dental Anatomy Grading and Dr. Eric Levine presented the program: ComputerAssisted Evaluation for Preclinical Dental Education. CODE acknowledges, the work of Dr. Tilly Peters in helping to make the presentations possible. The Power Point of the presentations are posted on the CODE website. I had the privilege of attending the 2014 Region IV meeting at Midwestern University College of Dental Medicine- Illinois in Downer’s Grove, IL. Dr. Marsha Babka served as a first-time host and she did an outstanding job of conducting the meeting, completing the regional report and showing the attendees excellent hospitality. There was lively discussion, great food and camaraderie. It was an opportunity for me to renew life-long friendships in the Great Lakes Region. I would like to take this opportunity to thank Marsha for hosting a wonderful meeting. Consistent with Dr. Haisch’s urgings, please continue to familiarize your Deans and Department chairs with CODE’s objectives and its value to their school, and the operative discipline. The deans’ support is crucial in providing the means for faculty to attend or host Regional meetings. Spread the word about CODE and work to provide input to Licensure Boards on Restorative Dentistry. Encourage/invite members of the Licensure examining boards to attend the Fall Regional meetings. Invite our colleagues in the Armed and Public Health Services to our meetings - both Regional and National. Support of CODE by payment from the schools for annual dues is excellent, although not without repeated follow-up efforts by the National office. The same can be said for the collection of the Fall Regional Reports. However, after only one “prompting”, I am greatly appreciative of the timely response this year. For the first time, CODE now operates under new Articles of Incorporation. This new formalized structure was necessary in order to shift the business from Nebraska to the State of Tennessee. Under these Articles, the Regional Directors serve as Board of Directors. As such, they were allowed to vote on the Articles and they were unanimously accepted by the newly formed Board of Directors. We still are under the direction of the Operative Section of ADEA, but the Articles allow us to conduct business as a non-profit organization. A copy of the Articles of Incorporation can be found on the C.O.D.E. website. 3 Thanks go to webmaster, Dr. William Johnson, for the timely website updates and enhancements. My appreciation also extends to the Regional Directors and the meeting hosts the Operative Section of ADEA and the general membership for helping to make CODE what it is and what it accomplishes. Thank you to my Dean, Dr. Timothy Hottel for his support. I could not have accomplished much of the operational aspects of CODE this second year without the assistance of Ms. Linda Diehl, Dr. William Johnson, Dr. Larry Haisch, and Ms. Wanda Patrick. Thank you, one and all. Sincerely, Edward J. DeSchepper, M.A.Ed., D.D.S., M.S.D. 4 Consortium of Operative Dentistry Educators (CODE) Foreword – Edward J. DeSchepper, M.A.Ed., D.D.S., M.S.D. National Director DeSchepper ED (ed.) CODE Regional Annual Reports 2014. http://www.unmc.edu/CODE ORIGINS OF C.O.D.E (Consortium of Operative Dental Educators) This portion written by Dr. Larry Haisch, DDS, Immediate Past National Director Project ACORDE (A Consortium of Restorative Dentistry Education) The date usually cited as the starting point for the development of Project ACORDE is 1966. That year, in Miami, the Operative Dentistry Section of AADS formed a committee charged to plan for the cooperative development of teaching dental materials. In July of 1971, the Dental Health Center, San Francisco, invited faculty from 14 dental schools to explore the feasibility of reaching consensus of a series of operative dental procedures. The outcome of the meeting suggested that it was feasible to achieve broad-based agreement on basic procedures: task analyses could be developed in which consensus could be reached on essential details of methods and instrumentation. The Project ACORDE committee was charged with the responsibility for coordinating curriculum development efforts on a national level in November of that year. Prominent in this project development were Bill Ferguson, David Grainger and Bob Wolcott. The Broad Goals and Functions of this committee were: 1. To gain agreement among all participating dental schools on the teaching of operative dentistry functions and gain acceptance by all schools. 2. To produce materials which can be universally accepted and utilized for teaching dental students and expanded function auxiliaries. During 1974, a 15-module package entitled Restoration of Cavities with Amalgam and Tooth-colored Materials was presented. The preparation package entitled Cavity Preparations for Amalgam and Tooth-colored Materials became available for distribution in March of 1976. Project ACORDE was found to have produced three major benefits for dental education: 1. It opened new channels of communication among dental educators. 2. It suggested uniform standards of quality for the performance of restorative skills. 3. It produced numerous lesson materials which were useful both for teaching students and as models of developers of other lessons. The benefit, most frequently cited by dental school faculty, was communication. The primary example of the communication begun by Project ACORDE, which has lasted well beyond the initial project, is CODE 5 (Consortium of Operative Dentistry Educators). CODE has as its goal, the continuation of meetings for the purpose of information exchange among teachers of operative dentistry. Regional CODE meetings are held annually with minutes of each session recorded and sent to the national director for distribution. This system is a direct spin-off of Project ACORDE. The first annual session of CODE was held in 1974/75. The Early Years (1974-1977) As founding father of the concept, Robert B. Wolcott of UCLA assumed the role of national coordinator and appointed Frank J. Miranda of the University of Oklahoma as national secretary. A common agenda to be provided to all six regions was established at this time. The first regional meetings were held in the winter of 1974. During the first three years of operation, each region devised a system of rotation so that a different school hosted the regional meeting each year, thus providing a greater degree of motivation and bringing schools closer together in a spirit of fellowship and unity. Each region submitted suggestions for future agendas, thereby insuring a continued discussion of interesting and relevant topics. A collection of tests or a test bank was started in early 1976. This bank consisted of submitted written examination questions on specified topics that were compiled and redistributed to all schools. The Transition Years (1977-1980) The first indication that the future of CODE was in jeopardy came in 1977, the first year that a national report could not be complied and distributed. As
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coding Tips For: PROGRESS NOTE CONTENTS
    Coding tips for: PROGRESS NOTE CONTENTS PREFERRED FORMAT, PER CMS, IS THE S.O.A.P. FORMAT: SUBJECTIVE: This section should be utilized to report subjective information of clinical significance. The chief complaint of the patient belongs in this section. OBJECTIVE: This section is where you will report the measurable and observable information that you obtain during the visit. Review of systems, physical examination, any test results, outside communications with specialists should be noted in this section. ASSESSMENT: List all diagnoses and conditions assessed during the visit. Include any conditions for which prescriptions were given/renewed, tests were ordered, referrals were given. Also include any conditions in which affected decision-making for treatment. PLAN: The final section of your SOAP notes is where you outline the course of treatment, after considering the information you gathered during the visit. e text box anywhere in the document. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the pull quote text box.] Coding tips for: ASSURE PROGRESS NOTE COMPLIANCE The physician’s signature must be on all progress notes If the physician does not include his/her credentials as part of their signature, the full name and credentials must be printed clearly on the note The patient’s name, date of birth and DOS must be on each page of the patient’s progress note/chart Electronic Medical Records must clearly be “authenticated", “digitally signed”, “electronically signed by” the provider The medical record must be legible/complete Only standard medical abbreviations should be used Late entries can be made to clarify confirmed diagnoses.
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Terminology Information Sheet
    Medical Terminology Information Sheet: Medical Chart Organization: • Demographics and insurance • Flow sheets • Physician Orders Medical History Terms: • Visit notes • CC Chief Complaint of Patient • Laboratory results • HPI History of Present Illness • Radiology results • ROS Review of Systems • Consultant notes • PMHx Past Medical History • Other communications • PSHx Past Surgical History • SHx & FHx Social & Family History Types of Patient Encounter Notes: • Medications and medication allergies • History and Physical • NKDA = no known drug allergies o PE Physical Exam o Lab Laboratory Studies Physical Examination Terms: o Radiology • PE= Physical Exam y x-rays • (+) = present y CT and MRI scans • (-) = Ф = negative or absent y ultrasounds • nl = normal o Assessment- Dx (diagnosis) or • wnl = within normal limits DDx (differential diagnosis) if diagnosis is unclear o R/O = rule out (if diagnosis is Laboratory Terminology: unclear) • CBC = complete blood count o Plan- Further tests, • Chem 7 (or Chem 8, 14, 20) = consultations, treatment, chemistry panels of 7,8,14,or 20 recommendations chemistry tests • The “SOAP” Note • BMP = basic Metabolic Panel o S = Subjective (what the • CMP = complete Metabolic Panel patient tells you) • LFTs = liver function tests o O = Objective (info from PE, • ABG = arterial blood gas labs, radiology) • UA = urine analysis o A = Assessment (Dx and DDx) • HbA1C= diabetes blood test o P = Plan (treatment, further tests, etc.) • Discharge Summary o Narrative in format o Summarizes the events of a hospital stay
    [Show full text]
  • The AOA Guide
    The AOA Guide: How to Succeed in the Third-Year Clerkships Example Notes for the MSIII 2014 Preface This guide was created as a way of assisting you as you start your clinical training. For the rest of your professional life you will write various notes, and although they eventually become second nature to you, it is often challenging at first to figure out what information is pertinent to a particular specialty/rotation.This book is designed to help you through that process. In this book you will find samples of SOAP notes for each specialty and a complete History and Physical. Each of these notes represents very typical patients you will see on the rotation. Look at the way the notes are phrased and the information they contain. We have included an abbreviations page at the end of this book so that you can refer to it for the short-forms with which you are not yet familiar. Pretty soon you will be using these abbreviations without a problem! These notes can be used as a template from which you can adjust the information to apply to your patient. It is important to remember that these notes are not all inclusive, of course, and other physicians will give suggestions that you should heed. If you are having trouble, remember there is usually a fourth year medical student on the rotation somewhere, too. We are always willing to help! Table of Contents Internal Medicine Progress Note (SOAP) ............................................................3 Neurology Progress Note (SOAP) ....................................................................... 5 Surgery ................................................................................................................. 7 Progress Note (SOAP) .................................................................................... 7 Pre-Operative Note ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EHR Go Guide: the Notes Tab
    EHR Go Guide: The Notes Tab Introduction The Notes tab in the EHR contains narrative information about a patient’s current and past medical history. It is where all members of the health care team communicate about the patient during a hospital visit or while receiving outpatient care. Notes are documented on regular intervals about clinical events related to the diagnoses and treatment of the patient. There are many types of notes in the EHR including: admission notes, assessments, SOAP notes, exams, reports, screening tools, progress notes, evaluations, and more. Notes are sometimes referred to as “Flow Sheets.” Most note options are templated, meaning specific fields or questions are built in to the note for the clinician to answer, while other notes allow for free-text narrative entry. Case patients in EHR Go have existing notes in their chart. You may review these notes to gather detailed information about the patient’s condition. It is often helpful to review the patient’s notes first, to learn about the patient, before reviewing the information in the other EHR tabs. In some activities, you’ll need to write a new note. This guide explains how to access and review existing notes, edit notes, and create new notes. Additional resources Please refer to the Student Guide to EHR Go for information on logging in to Go and launching the EHR for an activity. FAQs about notes 1. Can I edit a note after I have finished it? a. Yes. In EHR Go, you may edit any existing note as often as needed. See Editing a Note section.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Notes and Psychotherapy Notes
    Progress Notes and Psychotherapy Notes This Appendix covers two kinds of notes written about psychotherapy—progress notes and psychotherapy notes—and highlights the practical value of this important distinction. Progress notes are part of the client record or file, as noted below. Psychotherapy notes are not part of the file. After an overview of the client file or record, the difference between these two kinds of notes is discussed along with guides for writing progress notes. The Client File or Record The record or file of a client’s treatment at the Clinic consists of: Contact information Informed consent for treatment (including notification of rights) An intake report and/or, A written treatment plan or case formulation based on an initial assessment (i.e. interview information, formal assessment if used, and any other information collected from other sources) Progress notes documenting treatment, filed in reverse chronological order on the Clinic form Progress Note A termination note when work is concluded Other materials such as releases of information, test protocols, information obtained from other sources and so forth. The file or record does not contain psychotherapy notes (see below). Another way of saying this is that if it’s in the file, it’s not a psychotherapy note. As context for progress notes versus psychotherapy notes, please also refer to the form in Appendix D Brief Summary of Client Rights to Privacy and Access to Records and Consent to Behavioral Health Treatment and to the document in that appendix entitled Protecting the Privacy of Your Behavioral Health Information. A general intake outline is contained in Appendix C-4 Intake Outline and Report which can serve to organize information and begin treatment planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting up a Progress Note in Ecw 11 for Medical Assistants
    Setting Up a Progress Note in ECW 11 In this document, I will explain how to set up a progress note in ECW 11. When the visit is first opened, ECW asks if the medications should be carried into the note – the answer is always “Yes”. If there are any errors in the medication list from prior encounters, they will be pulled into this note as well, which is why reconciling medications is one of the most important steps in setting up a note properly. We start with the basic framework of a SOAP note. The chief complaint is pulled from the schedule - when this appointment was made, someone entered a reason, and this is pulled in as the chief complaint. The next step in most offices is to add a template to the note. At the bottom of the progress note is a panel of options. Clicking on the “Template” button opens the template screen. The current filter in the template screen is “Generic” and “All”. Once you set up your favorites, it will be much easier to quickly locate the template you wish to use by selecting “My Favorites” rather than “All” as a filter. When you find a template you like, click on “Add As Favorite” and this template will be added to your template favorites. Clicking on the magnifying glass will open a view of the template, allowing you to see what you are importing into the note. The panel at the right shows you which sections of the template will be added to the note.
    [Show full text]
  • Ideal Inpatient Progress Notes Template of Ideal Progress Note
    Ideal Inpatient Progress Notes Template of Ideal Progress Note List of items from the survey to include in the Ideal Progress Note Subjective: • Brief narrative of events; last 24 hours Do include: 1. Summary of previous 24 hour events Objective: 2. Explain what the author is thinking • Pertinent VS 3. Document only pertinent exam findings • I&O if important to problem(s) 4. Describe the diagnosis at the appropriate level of specificity • Only pertinent labs, x-rays, imaging a. Non-specific vs. specific to support billing b. Admission dx: dyspnea; diagnosis after further Physical Exam: evaluation: CHF, systolic • Only pertinent findings 5. Only active inpatient problems 6. Pending results (labs, radiology) Assessment: 7. Keep things brief • Brief 1-2 sentence overview of current status 8. Document plan for next 24 hours • Description of patient problems that are active on this 9. Use problems (not organ systems) as structure for A&P admission 10. Justification for inpatient stay • Describe to the appropriate level of specificity o e.g. dyspnea vs. Acute on Chronic Heart Failure due Don’ts: to uncontrolled hypertension 1. Don’t copy/paste unless relentlessly editing • If you include a running summary, denote today’s changes 2. Don’t import lengthy labs, radiology, VS with bold font • Justify continued inpatient stay Plan: • Explain what the author is thinking o Differential diagnosis or clinical reasoning • Pending labs, x-rays, consults • Plan for next 24 hours (make new items bold font) Revised 4/4/12 Jeff Belden MD | [email protected] | www.toomanyclicks.com Adam Fitzgerald MD | [email protected] Family & Community Medicine | University of Missouri-Columbia EXAMPLE IDEAL PROGRESS NOTE S: Patient abdominal pain improved overnight and tolerating clear liquid diet.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale Behavioral Health Services at Hamden
    1 EVALUATION AND MANAGEMENT NEW PATIENT OFFICE PROGRESS NOTE Client Name:___________________________ Date of Service:_______________ Provider Name:______________________ Time In:______________am/pm Time Out:________________ am/pm Total Time Spent (minutes):_____________________ Level of Service: 99202______ 99203______99204______99205_____ COUNSELING/COORDINATION>50% of time (explain)________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ CHIEF COMPLAINT: TABULATION OF MEDICAL DECISION-MAKING ELEMENTS-Highest 2 out of 3 for Overall MDM # of Diagnoses or Points Amount and Complexity of Points Risk Factors of Presenting Number of Management Options Data Problems Management Options Self-limiting 1 Review and/or order lab data 1 One self-limited or minor Rest problem, e.g., dysthymia well- managed Minimal Risk Established problem to 1 Review and/or order radiology 1 Two or more self-limited or OTC Meds examining provider- tests minor problems; stable or improved One stable chronic illness; Low Risk Acute uncomplicated illness Established problem to 2 Review and/or order tests in 1 One or more chronic illnesses Prescription RX examining provider- the medical section of with mild exacerbation, worsening CPT progression, or side effects; Moderate Risk Two or more stable chronic illnesses; Undiagnosed new problem with uncertain prognosis; Acute illness with systemic symptoms New problem to 3 Discussion of test results with 1 One or more chronic
    [Show full text]
  • Surviving Clerkship a Practical Guide
    UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO FACULTY OF MEDICINE SURVIVING CLERKSHIP A PRACTICAL GUIDE EIGHTEENTH EDITION 2019 Editors: Jordan Lewis, Chris Adams-McGavin & Rohan Philip Class of 2T0 Associate Editors: Hetshree Joshi and Maham Bushra Sponsored by: MD Financial Management Previous Editors SEVENTEETH EDITION, 2018 Robin Mawson & Juliet Shao (IT9) SIXTEENTH EDITION, 2017 Linda Chow & Roland Xu (1T8) FIFTEENTH EDITION, 2016 Dhruvin Hirpara, Narayan Chattergoon & Marcus Tan (1T7) FOURTEENTH EDITION, 2015 Pavel Ketov, Alex Wasserman & Jason Woodfine (1T6) THIRTEENTH EDITION, 2014 Hassan Masoom, Mohammed, Sabri Attia & Nadia Salvo (1T5) TWELFTH EDITION, 2013 Anthony La Delfa, Erin Thomas Wong (1T4) ELEVENTH EDITION, 2012 Dahlia Balaban, Erin Spicer (1T3) TENTH EDITION, 2011 Corey Boimer, Marcus Miller (1T2) NINTH EDITION, 2010 Alex Cheng, Faazil Kassam (1T1) EIGHTH EDITION, 2009 Emilie Lam, Akash Patel (1T0) SEVENTH EDITION, 2008 Emilie Lam, Akash Patel (1T0) SIXTH EDITION, 2007 Tony Tam, Taryn Simms, Nam Le, Amol Verma (OT9) FIFTH EDITION, 2006 Charles Kassardjian, June Lee (OT8) FOURTH EDITION, 2004 (reprint) THIRD EDITION, 2003 Adam Fleming (OT4) SECOND EDITION, 2001 Sharmistha Mishra, Evan Propst, Darren Yuen (OT2) FIRST EDITION, 2000 Jane Vetiska (OT1) 2 / 120 University of Toronto, 2017 Dear 2T1 Clinical Clerks, The Office of Health Professions Student Affairs (OHPSA) is your confidential, neutral, safe space for support around your learning environment. Some of the services offered in house include: - Personal Counselling - Career Counselling/advising - Academic Coaching and support - Support for Leaves of Absences We also focus on wellness and mental health and are your go-to place for everything match/CaRMS. If we don't have what you need in house, we will link you to other supports within the MD Program, the University, and/or the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Documentation Manual
    MENTAL HEALTH DOCUMENTATION MANUAL FEBRUARY 2021 SAN MATEO COUNTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM OF CARE Got a question? This manual provides the documentation standards for mental health Send QM an email at services provided by all BHRS programs including our contracted provid- [email protected] ers. The manual provides a general description of services and service definitions, and is a day-to-day resource for both clinical and administra- Visit us on the web at tive support staff. Additional resources include the Management Infor- www.smchealth.org/bhrs/qm mation System (MIS) Coding Manual, and State and Federal regulatory documents. See our online BHRS documentation standards were established to fulfill a core value of documentation training at our system—the commitment to clinical and service excellence. Further- more, accurate and complete documentation protects us from risk in www.smchealth.org/bhrs/ legal proceedings, helps us to comply with regulatory requirements providers/ontrain when we submit claims for services, and enables professionals to dis- charge their legal and ethical duties. All of our services are documented Check out our policies and see ad- using Medi-Cal and Medicare documentation standards, regardless of ditional resources at funding source. Services for clients with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders are documented using the rules presented in www.smchealth.org/behavioral- this manual. health-staff-documentation-forms- policies HOW TO GET HELP This manual is BHRS policy and is the resource for all documentation issues. The View our Quality Management intranet site provides links to other resources as well as train- Compliance Program ings, guides and other helpful documents.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 STAR Documentation
    5 STARR Documentation Components of a good eBridge Progress note & Guidelines for Nursing Documentation Liz Henderson, RN; Lillian Ananian, RN; Erin Cox, RN; Jen Clair, RN; Trish Zeytoonjian, RN; Shelly Stuler, RN; Annabaker Garber, RN, Melissa Lantry, RN General Purposes of documentation • Informs health care planning • Utilized for quality assurance/improvement • Influences allocation of resources S.T.A.R.R • Think about this with EVERY note you write: • S Source of truth • T Tell the Patient’s Story • AAccountability, Accuracy & Authorship • RReflect the nursing care YOU have provided • RResolve outstanding problems Source of Truth • The Electronic Health Record (EHR) is utilized by multiple disciplines caring for the patient and ultimately should accurately reflect individualized, patient-centered care • Documentation should reflect actual care that is provided to the patient • Information should be valid and reliable (Wang, Hailey & Yu, 2011) Tells the patient’s story • Reflects individualized patient care • Standardizes communication across providers Content of Documentation should include: • Diagnosis • Current problems • Nursing Interventions • Up-to-date assessments related to each problem • Outcomes • Resolution of active problems (Keenan, Yakel, Tschannen, & Mandeville, 2008) Professional accountability Provision 4 of the Code of Ethics for Nurses states that: “The nurse is responsible and accountable for individual nursing practice..In each instance, the nurse retains accountability and responsibility for the quality of practice
    [Show full text]
  • NEAT) Progress Note Suggested Clinical Data Elements (Cdes
    DRAFT Use of the Suggested Clinical Data Elements is Voluntary / Optional Non-Emergency Ambulance Transportation (NEAT) Progress Note Suggested Clinical Data Elements (CDEs) Version R1.0e (7/20/2018) Note: If these CDEs are used: 1) CDEs in black Calibri are required 2) CDEs in burnt orange Italics Calibri are required if the condition is met 3) CDEs in blue Times New Roman are recommended but not required Beneficiary Information CDEs PBD: Patient/Beneficiary Demographics PBD1: Patient’s first name, last name, and middle initial (text) PBD2: Patient’s date of birth (date: MM/DD/YYYY) PBD3: Patient’s Gender (Single selection from the value set: M, F, Other) PBD4: Patient’s Medicare ID (Medicare ID format and check digit) Provider Information CDEs PND: Physician/Practitioner Information (Provider/NPP Demographics) If different than Signing provider (if different from signing provider) PND1: Provider or Allowed NPP first name, last name, middle initial, and suffix (text). PND2: Provider NPI (Numeric with check digit) PND5: Place of Employment (text) PND3: Provider Telephone Number (xxx-xxx-xxxxx ext xxxx) PND4: Provider Direct address (Direct address) (optional) Date of Evaluation Provider Information CDEs ENC: Encounter ENC1: Date of evaluation (date: MM/DD/YYYY) NEATENC: Neat Encounter Information NEATENC1: Is evaluation related to primary reason for XXXXXX (single selection from value set: Yes, No) NEAT Progress Note Suggested CDEs Draft R1.0e 7/20/2018 Page 1 of 7 DRAFT Note: If these CDEs are used: 1) CDEs in black Calibri are required
    [Show full text]