DOCSLIB.ORG

Revista Da Escola Da Magistratura Regional Federal Da 2ª Região Emarf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Revista Da Escola Da Magistratura Regional Federal Da 2ª Região Emarf REVISTA DA ESCOLA DA MAGISTRATURA REGIONAL FEDERAL DA 2ª REGIÃO EMARF Tribunal Regional Federal da 2ª Região Volume 26 Mai./Out.17 Esta revista não pode ser reproduzida total ou parcialmente sem autorização Revista da Escola da Magistratura Regional Federal / Escola da Magistratura Regional Federal, Tribunal Regional Federal da 2ª Região. N. 1 (ago. 1999) Rio de Janeiro: EMARF - TRF 2ª Região / RJ 2017 - volume 26, n. 1 (mai./out.2017) Semestral Disponível em: <http://seer.trf2.jus.br:81/emarf/ojs/index.php/ emarf> ISSN 1518-918X 1. Direito - Periódicos. I. Escola da Magistratura Regional Federal. CDD: 340.05 Diretoria da EMARF Diretor-Geral Desembargador Federal Luiz Paulo da Silva Araújo Filho Diretor de Estágio Desembargador Federal Luiz Antonio Soares Diretor de Publicações Desembargador Federal Augusto Guilherme Diefenthaeler Diretor de Intercâmbio e Difusão Desembargador Federal Marcus Abraham Diretora de Cursos e Pesquisas Desembargadora Federal Simone Schreiber EQUIPE DA EMARF Regina Elizabeth Tavares Marçal - Assessora Executiva Rio de Janeiro Clarice de Souza Biancovilli Flávia Dias de Paiva Flávia Munic Medeiros Pereira George Geraldo Bernardino da Silva Juliana Pimentel Duque Estrada Meyer Leila Andrade de Souza Luciana de Mello Leitão Luiz Carlos Lorenzo Peralba Maria Suely Nunes do Nascimento Marta Geovana de Oliveira Pedro Mailto de Figueiredo Lima Thereza Helena Perbeils Marchon Vilma Ferreira Amado Espírito Santo Soraya Bassini Chamun Rayane Ferreira Machado Daher Conselho Editorial Agostinho Teixeira de Almeida Filho, Tribunal de Justiça do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Desembargador, Brasil Alberto Nogueira, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal aposentado, Brasil Alberto Nogueira Jr., Justiça Federal 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Aluísio Gonçalves de Castro Mendes, Tribunal Regional Federal da 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Américo Augusto Nogueira Vieira, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Brasil Américo Bedê Freire Jr., Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Ana Paula Vieira de Carvalho, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juíza Federal, Brasil André Ricardo Cruz Fontes, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Artur de Brito Gueiros de Souza, Procuradoria Regional da República 2ª Região, Brasil Augusto Guilherme Diefenthaeler, Tribunal Regional Federal da 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil. Caio Márcio Gutterres Taranto, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Carlos Guilherme Francovich Lugones, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Carmem Tiburcio, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Brasil Celso de Albuquerque Silva, Procuradoria Regional da República 2ª Região, Brasil Daniel Antônio de Moraes Sarmento, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Brasil Eugênio Rosa de Araújo, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Guilherme Calmon Nogueira da Gama, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Guilherme Couto de Castro, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Gustavo Sampaio Telles Ferreira, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Brasil Helena Elias Pinto, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juíza Federal, Brasil Jane Reis Gonçalves Pereira, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juíza Federal, Brasil Leonardo Greco, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ, Brasil Revista da EMARF, Rio de Janeiro, v.26, n.1, p.1-294, mai./out.2017 5 Conselho Editorial Fernanda Duarte Lopes Lucas da Silva, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juíza Federal, Brasil Firly Nascimento Filho, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Flávio de Oliveira Lucas, Justiça Fedeal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Luís Greco, Universidade da Alemanha, Alemanha Luiz Antonio Soares, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Luiz Paulo da Silva Araújo Filho, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Marcus Abraham, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Marcus Lívio Gomes, Justiça Federal 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Nadia de Araújo, Pontifícia Universidade Católica - PUC-Rio, Brasil Paulo Cezar Pinheiro Carneiro, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Brasil Paulo Freitas Ribeiro, Advogado, Brasil Pedro Marcos Nunes Barbosa, Pontifícia Universidade Católica - PUC-Rio, Brasil Poul Erik Dyrlund, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Reis Friede, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Ricardo Perlingeiro Mendes da Silva, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal, Brasil Ricarlos Almagro Vitoriano Cunha, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Rodolfo Kronemberg Hartmann, Justiça Federal da 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil Rodrigo de Souza Costa, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Brasil Rogério Dultra dos Santos, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF, Brasil Sérgio D’Andrea Ferreira, Tribunal Regional Federal 2ª Região, Desembargador Federal aposentado, Brasil Silvana Batini César Góes, Procuradoria Regional da República 2ª Região, Brasil Theophilo Antonio Miguel Filho, Justiça Federal 2ª Região, Juiz Federal, Brasil 6 Revista da EMARF, Rio de Janeiro, v.26, n.1, p.1-294, mai./out.2017 Tribunal Regional Federal da 2ª Região Presidente Desembargador Federal ANDRÉ R. C. FONTES Vice-Presidente Desembargador Federal GUILHERME COUTO DE CASTRO Corregedora-Geral Desembargadora Federal NIZETE LOBATO RODRIGUES CARMO Membros Desembargador Federal PAULO ESPIRITO SANTO Desembargadora Federal VERA LÚCIA LIMA Desembargador Federal ANTONIO IVAN ATHIÉ Desembargador Federal SERGIO SCHWAITZER Desembargador Federal POUL ERIK DYRLUND Desembargador Federal REIS FRIEDE Desembargador Federal ABEL GOMES Desembargador Federal LUIZ ANTONIO SOARES Desembargador Federal MESSOD AZULAY NETO Desembargadora Federal LANA REGUEIRA Desembargador Federal GUILHERME CALMON NOGUEIRA DA GAMA Desembargador Federal JOSÉ ANTONIO LISBÔA NEIVA Desembargador Federal JOSÉ FERREIRA NEVES NETO Desembargador Federal LUIZ PAULO DA SILVA ARAÚJO FILHO Desembargador Federal Aluisio GONÇalves DE Castro MENDES Desembargador Federal AUGUSTO GUILHERME DIEFENTHAELER Desembargador Federal MARCUS ABRAHAM Desembargador Federal MARCELO PEREIRA DA SILVA Desembargador Federal RICARDO PERLINGEIRO Desembargadora Federal CLAUDIA MARIA PEREIRA BASTOS NEIVA Desembargadora Federal LETICIA DE SANTIS Mello Desembargadora Federal SIMONE SCHREIBER Desembargador Federal MARCELLO GRANADO Desembargador Federal ALCIDES MARTINS RIBEIRO FILHO Revista da EMARF, Rio de Janeiro, v.26, n.1, p.1-294, mai./out.2017 7 SUMÁRIO JUSTIÇA E POLÍTICA: ARENAS DE DESIGUAIS ..................................................................... 11 Alexandre Chini e Marcelo Moraes Caetano O STREAMING E A SUA MONETIZAÇÃO: REPERCUSSÃO SEM FRONTEIRAS .......... 23 Ana Letícia Allevato Coelho, Raquel Franco Apulchro Miranda de Sá e Tatiana de Melo Cotrim O teXto “LEI E JUÍZO” NA OBra DE CARL SCHmitt ........................................................ 41 André R. C. Fontes Adimplemento das OBrigaçÕES internacionais: O LegislatiVO E A LEI 13.146/2015 ....................................................................................................................................... 45 Bruna Vilanova Machado e Renan Soares Cortazio OS LIMITES DO EXercício DOS direitos políticos da pessoa com DEFICIÊNCIA ..................................................................................................................................... 63 Bruno Cezar Andrade de Souza A TRANSIÇÃO DEMOCRÁTICA IMPOSTA E SUA RELAÇÃO COM A JUSTIÇA DE TRANSIÇÃO ....................................................................................................................................... 79 Enio Viterbo Martins A JURISDIÇÃO ADMINISTRATIVA E O DIREITO JURISPRUDENCIAL: A UTILIZAÇÃO DE ENUNCIADOS ADMINISTRATIVOS COMO PADRÕES DECISÓRIOS JUDICIAIS NO NOVO CÓDIGO DE PROCESSO CIVIL ..................................................................................... 91 Felippe Borring Rocha OS DIREITOS SOCIAIS PRESTACIONAIS À LUZ DAS DECLARAÇÕES DE DIREITOS DO HOMEM ............................................................................................................................................113 Fernanda Barreto Alves e Rafael Meireles Saldanha A CONVERGÊNCIA ENTRE COOPERAÇÃO PROCESSUAL E CONSENSUALIDADE ADMINSTRATIVA, NA GESTÃO DO ESTADO DEMOCRÁTICO DE DIREITO ..............129 Jessé Torres Pereira Junior e Thaís Marçal Sonegação TRIButária E tarifária: ainda A distinção ENTRE TRIButo E tarifa ...............................................................................................................................................139 Leonardo de Medeiros Fernandes Revista da EMARF, Rio de Janeiro, v.26, n.1, p.1-294, mai./out.2017 9 Sumário DA ABUSIVIDADE DA OBSOLESCÊNCIA PROGRAMADA À LUZ DO CDC...............163 Leonardo Ribeiro Machado O TRIBUNAL PENAL INTERNACIONAL. ANTECEDENTES. RECEPÇÃO PELO DIREITO INTERNO. COMPETÊNCIA. .........................................................................................................185 Paulo Roberto Bérenger Alves Carneiro A FUNÇÃO SOCIAL E A USUCAPIÃO DOS BENS PÚBLICOS: UMA RELEITURA A PARTIR DA CONSTITUCIONALIZAÇÃO DO ORDENAMENTO JURÍDICO .................................205 Rafael Carvalho Rezende Oliveira e Thaís Boia Marçal Operação LAVA-jato: O Estado Democrático de Direito em XEQue nos países DE modernidade PERIFÉrica ..............................................................................231
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Federative Republic of Brazil July 2018
    Migration Governance Snapshot: The Federative Republic of Brazil July 2018 In 2015, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) developed a Migration Governance Framework (MiGOF) to help countries define what “well-managed migration policy” might look like at the national level. The MiGOF was welcomed by IOM’s Member States in the same year. The Migration Governance Indicators (MGI) 1 were developed to assist countries operationalize the MiGOF by using a standard set of approximately 90 indicators that could be applied across six key policy domains. The MGI is a tool based on policy inputs, which offers insights on policy levers that countries can use to develop their migration governance. The MGI is not intended to function as a measurement of outcomes related to migration policies and institutions. Instead, it operates as input-based benchmarking framework that offers insights on policy measures that countries can use to strengthen migration governance. The MGI is not meant to rank countries in the assessment of the comprehensiveness of their migration policies, or to identify gaps and areas that could be strengthened. The MGI aims to assist countries while advancing the conversation on migration governance by clarifying what “well-governed migration” might look like in the context of the Sustainable Development Goal Target 10.7, “Facilitate orderly, safe, regular and responsible migration and mobility of people, including through the implementation of planned and well- managed migration policies.” This country snapshot presents a summary of well-governed areas of the Federative Republic of Brazil’s (hereafter referred to as Brazil) migration governance structures, as well as the areas with potential for further development, as assessed by MGI.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Cite Complete Issue More Information About This Article
    Revista de Investigações Constitucionais ISSN: 2359-5639 Universidade Federal do Paraná ALVARADO, ARTURO The Brazilian Constitution of 1988: a comparative appraisal Revista de Investigações Constitucionais, vol. 5, no. 3, 2018, September-December, pp. 137-148 Universidade Federal do Paraná DOI: https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v5i3.60966 Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=534063442009 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System Redalyc More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Journal's webpage in redalyc.org Portugal Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Licensed under Creative Commons Revista de Investigações Constitucionais ISSN 2359-5639 DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v5i3.60966 The Brazilian Constitution of 1988: a comparative appraisal A Constituição Brasileira de 1988: uma avaliação comparativa ARTURO ALVARADOI, * I El Colegio de México (México) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6922-3507 [email protected] Recebido/Received: 12.08.2018 / August 12th, 2018 Aprovado/Approved: 01.09.2018 / September 1st, 2018 Abstract Resumo This article examines the 1988 constitution of The Fed- Este artigo examina a Constituição de 1988 da República erative Republic of Brazil and its significance after 30 Federativa do Brasil e seu significado após 30 anos de im- years of its implementation. Asserts some of its more plementação. Afirma algumas de suas características so- advance social, political features and evaluates the cur- ciais e políticas mais avançadas e avalia os desafios atuais rent challenges to implement a democratic governance, para implementar uma governança democrática, baseada based on a Rule of Law within the evolving constitutional em um Estado de Direito dentro da estrutura constitucional framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanisms to Claim the Human Right to Adequate Food in Brazil
    Exigibiladade: Mechanisms to claim the human right to adequate food in Brazil Right to Food Studies Exigibilidade: Mechanisms to claim the human right to adequate food in Brazil Valéria Burity Luisa Cruz Thaís Franceschini Food and agriculture organization oF the united nations rome, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. E-ISBN 978-92-5-106814-4 (PDF) All rights reserved. FAO encourages reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Non-commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate FAO copyright materials, and all other queries concerning rights and licences, should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] or to the Chief, Publishing Policy and Support Branch, Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension, FAO, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, 00153 Rome, Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Appointment Discretion and Judicial Independence: Preference and Opportunistic Effects on Brazilian Courts*
    Government Appointment Discretion and Judicial Independence: preference and opportunistic effects on Brazilian Courts* Felipe Lopes Paulo Furquim de Azevedo Insper Working Paper WPE: 371/2017 Government Appointment Discretion and Judicial Independence: preference and opportunistic effects on Brazilian Courts* Felipe Lopes Sao Paulo School of Economics – FGV Paulo Furquim de Azevedo† Insper Institute, and CNPq Abstract The prolific literature on de facto judicial independence misses a key variable: the government’s discretion over the appointment of Supreme Court Justices. In this paper we explore a distinct feature of the Brazilian judiciary system to assess political influence due to government appointment discretion. As there are two courts, the STF (Supreme Federal Court) and the STJ (Superior Court of Justice), which deal with similar matters and have different restrictions on the appointment of their members, it is possible to compare the degree of political influence to which they are subject. We test (1) whether there are differences in the degree of political influence depending on the president’s discretion over the nomination of a justice, and (2) whether the justices actively benefit the party of the president who has appointed them. We find evidence of the former, but not of the latter effect. Keywords: Judicial independence, Supreme Court, appointment discretion * The authors thank Lee Benham, Sandro Cabral, Sergio Lazzarini, Bernardo Mueller, Claude Menard, Aldo Mussachio, Carlos Pereira, and seminar participants at the International Society for New Institutional Economics and FGV for many helpful comments and suggestions. We also are grateful to Ben Schneider and the MIT Political Science Department for providing a fruitful environment for the development of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Brazil, 1967 (As Amended by Constitutional Amendment No
    Constitution of Brazil, 1967 (as amended by Constitutional Amendment no. 1 of October 17, 1969) Brazil. Washington : General Secretariat, Organization of American States, [197-] https://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015011287649 Public Domain in the United States, Google-digitized http://www.hathitrust.org/access_use#pd-us-google We have determined this work to be in the public domain in the United States of America. It may not be in the public domain in other countries. Copies are provided as a preservation service. Particularly outside of the United States, persons receiving copies should make appropriate efforts to determine the copyright status of the work in their country and use the work accordingly. It is possible that current copyright holders, heirs or the estate of the authors of individual portions of the work, such as illustrations or photographs, assert copyrights over these portions. Depending on the nature of subsequent use that is made, additional rights may need to be obtained independently of anything we can address. The digital images and OCR of this work were produced by Google, Inc. (indicated by a watermark on each page in the PageTurner). Google requests that the images and OCR not be re-hosted, redistributed or used commercially. The images are provided for educational, scholarly, non-commercial purposes. ^^^^ , CONSTITUTION OF 1967 (As Amended) ,^wgx GEN Kli A L SKi !R ETTA R I AT rjjSJfcy ( >RGANIZATION < )!•- A M 10 R K -A N STATES WASHINGTON. D.C. CONSTITUTION OF BRAZIL 1967 (As amended by Constitutional Amendment No. 1 of October 17, 1969) GENERAL SECRETARIAT ORGANIZATION OP AMERICAN STATES WASHINGTON.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 BRAZIL Introduction
    4 BRAZIL Introduction Bountiful Brazil Brazil is huge in every way - in size, population, and wealth. The world's fifth largest country is the world's ninth richest economy, and home to 160 million people. Brazil's landmass occupies most of South America to the east of the Andes. It stretches from the Equator in the North to the temperate, wine-producing zone in the south. It contains most of the world's largest tropical forest, the Amazon. The Amazon basin, more than 5 million square kilometres in extent, is a giant cornucopia of bio-diversity, teeming with rare plants, animals, birds, and fish. To the east, stretching into Paraguay and Bolivia, are the vast wetlands known as the Pantanal, a birdwatchers' paradise, where cayman crocodiles sunbathe on river banks in their scores. Besides the gigantic Amazon basin, Brazil's other regions are bathed by three large river systems, the Parana, the Paraguai, and the Sao Francisco; its subterranean water tables cover an area greater than France, Spain, and Portugal combined. All this gives Brazil the largest potable water supply in the world, 20 per cent of the earth's total volume. This < A Macuxi girl, from an abundance of water provides Brazil with millions of acres of fertile land, indigenous community in the which make it one of the world's major exporters of grain and other state of Roraima, with her commodities. It ranks first for coffee exports, third for sugar and oilseeds pet parrot like sunflower and soybean, fourth for cocoa and coarse grains, tenth for :> Waterfalls on the Parana river at Foz do Iguacu, on the border between Brazil and Paraguay BRAZIL 5 rice and cotton.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impeachment Process of Brazil: a Comparative Look at Impeachment in Brazil and the United States, 49 U
    University of Miami Law School University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository University of Miami Inter-American Law Review 1-2-2018 The mpI eachment Process of Brazil: A Comparative Look at Impeachment in Brazil and the United States Alexandra Rattinger Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons Recommended Citation Alexandra Rattinger, The Impeachment Process of Brazil: A Comparative Look at Impeachment in Brazil and the United States, 49 U. Miami Inter-Am. L. Rev. 129 (2018) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umialr/vol49/iss1/7 This Notes and Comments is brought to you for free and open access by University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Inter-American Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Impeachment Process of Brazil: A Comparative Look at Impeachment in Brazil and the United States. Alexandra Rattinger I. INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................130 II. BACKGROUND ..........................................................................132 A. Transitional Period of Military Regime to Democratic Means ...............................................................................132 B. Finally, Democracy ..........................................................134 III. SUMMARY OF CONSTITUTIONS AND LAWS REGARDING IMPEACHMENT—THE BRAZILIAN CONSTITUTION AND LAW NO. 1079 AND THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION USED TO COMPARE THE UNITED STATES’ IMPEACHMENT PROCESS TO BRAZIL’S. ..........................................................................135 A. Impeachment Under the United States Constitution ........136 B. Impeachment Under the Brazilian Constitution ...............139 C. Law No. 1079 (1950)- Crimes of Responsibility ..............144 IV. MODERN IMPEACHMENTS IN BRAZIL AND THE UNITED STATES.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Brasileira De Direito Processual Penal
    Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal Volume 5 - Nº 02 - mai./ago. 2019 ISSN 2525-510X https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v5i2 Dossiê “Cooperação Judiciária Internacional em Matéria Penal” IBRASPP Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal Volume 5 - Número 02 Brazilian Journal of Criminal Procedure Porto Alegre/RS mai./ago. 2019 http://www.ibraspp.com.br/revista/ (publicado em junho/2019) ISSN 2525-510X EXPEDIENTE / MASTHEAD EDITORES-CHEFES / EDITORS-IN-CHIEF Prof. Dr. Nereu José Giacomolli (Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul – Porto Alegre/RS) Prof. Dr. Vinicius Gomes de Vasconcellos (Instituto Brasiliense de Direito Público/DF; Universidade Estadual de Goiás – Goiânia/GO) EDITORES-ASSOCIADOS / ASSOCIATE-EDITORS Prof. Dr. André Machado Maya (Fundação Escola Superior do Ministério Público do Rio Grande do Sul– Porto Alegre/RS) Profa. Dra. Bruna Capparelli (Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna/ Itália) Prof. Dr. Caíque Ribeiro Galícia (Faculdade Campo Grande e Faculdade Mato Grosso do Sul – Campo Grande/MS) Prof. Dr. Pedro Caeiro (Universidade de Coimbra/Portugal) EDITORES-ASSISTENTES / ASSISTANT-EDITORS Prof. Dr. Armando Dias Ramos (Universidade Autônoma de Lisboa – Lisboa/PT) Profa. Dra. Érica Babini Machado (Universidade Católica de Pernambuco – Recife/PE) Profa. Me. Maria João Carvalho Vaz (Universidade de Coimbra – Coimbra/PT) Prof. Me. Rafael de Deus Garcia (Universidade de Brasília – Brasília/DF) Prof. Dr. Thiago Allisson Cardoso de Jesus (Universidade Estadual do Maranhão – São Luís/MA) CONSELHO EDITORIAL / EDITORIAL BOARD Profa. Dra. Claudia Cesari, Università degli Studi di Macerata, Itália Prof. Dr. Francesco Caprioli, Università degli Studi di Torino, Itália Prof. Dr. Gabriel Ignacio Anitua, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • What Have We Missed from Not Paying Brazilian Constitutionalism Its Due
    Licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Licensed under Creative Commons Revista de Investigações Constitucionais ISSN 2359-5639 DOI: 10.5380/rinc.v5i3.60976 Beyond futebol and language: what have we missed from not paying Brazilian constitutionalism its due attention? Reflections from Chile Para além do futebol e do idioma: o que perdemos por não ter dado ao constitucionalismo brasileiro a devida atenção? Reflexões a partir do Chile PABLO CONTRERASI, * I Universidad Alberto Hurtado (Chile) [email protected] DOMINGO LOVERAII, ** II Universidad Diego Portales (Chile) [email protected] Recebido/Received: 13.08.2018 / August 13th, 2018 Aprovado/Approved: 25.08.2018 / August 25th, 2018 Abstract Resumo This essay proposes a critical and comparative reflection Este ensaio propõe uma reflexão crítica e comparativa focusing on the lack of ‘constitutional dialogue’ Chile has com foco na falta de “diálogo constitucional” que o Chile developed with Brazil – and vice versa. After proposing desenvolveu com o Brasil – e vice-versa. Depois de propor a couple of contentions to explain this lack of attention algumas disputas para explicar essa falta de atenção (co- (cultural and constitutional colonialism, on the one hand, lonialismo cultural e constitucional, por um lado, aliado coupled with Brazil geopolitical power, on the other), it ao poder geopolítico do Brasil, por outro), passa a lamen- moves on to lament what this lack of attention has de- tar o quanto essa falta de atenção prejudicou o Chile. Ao prived Chile from. As it discusses the means to overcome discutir os meios para superar a falta de legitimidade que the lack of legitimacy that affects Chile’s constitutional afeta o texto constitucional do Chile, chama a atenção para text, it calls attention to some of the reasons that may algumas das razões que podem explicar, e na realidade Como citar esse artigo/How to cite this article: CONTRERAS, Pablo; LOVERA, Domingo.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.African-Brazilian Cultural References in National Heritage
    VIBRANT - Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology E-ISSN: 1809-4341 [email protected] Associação Brasileira de Antropologia Brasil Arantes, Antonio A. African-Brazilian Cultural References In National Heritage. Questions of cultural politics VIBRANT - Vibrant Virtual Brazilian Anthropology, vol. 5, núm. 1, junio, 2008, pp. 20-33 Associação Brasileira de Antropologia Brasília, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=406941905002 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative African-Brazilian Cultural References In National Heritage Questions of cultural politics Antonio A. Arantes1 African-brazilian and Indigenous cultural references have not had a strong presence among the representations of brazilian-ness produced in the con- text of national heritage. However, they are highly praised in most narra- tives concerning Brazil as an ‘imagined community’, especially those con- structed around the theme of “racial democracy”. This inconsistency should not be ignored. In fact, it indicates that the formation of brazilian national heritage should be examined against the grain, and that the anthropological intricacies of the issue should be explored. This is what I intend to do here, even if briefly. 2 1. General remarks on cultural heritage as social practice, in the context of the formation of a global cultural public sphere3 The construction of social memory and the preservation of cultural heritage are closely related practices concerning the reproduction of social life. Both 1 Antonio A Arantes (PhD Cambridge).
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution of Brazil
    Biblioteca Digital da Câmara dos Deputados Centro de Documentação e Informação Coordenação de Biblioteca http://bd.camara.gov.br "Dissemina os documentos digitais de interesse da atividade legislativa e da sociedade.” 3 rd Edition 2010 Constitutional text of October 5, 1988, with the alterations introduced by Constitutional Amendments No. 1/1992 through 64/2010 and by Revision Constitutional Amendments No. 1/1994 through 6/1994. CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES Constitutional Amendments No. 1/1994 through 6/1994. 1/1994 through No. Amendments Constitutional Constitutional Amendments No. 1/1992 through Constitutional 64/2010 text and of by October Revision 5, 1988, with the alterations introduced by ISBN 978-85-736-5736-4 9 7 8 8 5 7 3 6 5 7 3 6 4 Chamber of Deputies Directing Board 53rd Congress – 4th Session 2010 President Michel Temer 1st Vice President Marco Maia 2nd Vice President Antonio Carlos Magalhães Neto 1st Secretary Rafael Guerra 2nd Secretary Inocêncio Oliveira 3rd Secretary Odair Cunha 4th Secretary Nelson Marquezelli Substitutes 1st Substitute Marcelo Ortiz 2nd Substitute Giovanni Queiroz 3rd Substitute Leandro Sampaio 4th Substitute Manoel Junior General Manager Sérgio Sampaio Contreiras de Almeida Secretary General to the Governing Board Mozart Vianna de Paiva CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL miolo_constitution_versao_camara.indd 1 17/6/2010 15:00:59 Chamber of Deputies CONSTITUTION OF THE FEDERATIVE REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL 3rd edition Constitutional text of October 5, 1988, with the alterations introduced by Constitutional Amendments No. 1/1992 through 64/2010 and by Revision Constitutional Amendments No. 1/1994 through 6/1994. Documentation and Information Center Publishing Coordination Brasília – 2010 CHAMBER OF DEPUTIES LEGISLATIVE DIVISION Head Afrísio Vieira Lima Filho DOCUMENTATION AND INFORMATION CENTER Head Adolfo C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Powers and Responsibilities in Brazil’S Federal Constitution, Tracing Its Historical Development and Describing How It Works in Practice
    THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF BRAZIL Marcelo Piancastelli This chapter provides an overview of the distribution of powers and responsibilities in Brazil’s federal Constitution, tracing its historical development and describing how it works in practice. Brazil has a vast territory and a complex federal system. Its economy, in terms of gross domestic product (GDP) in U.S. dollars, is among the ten largest in the world. Attempts to implement a federal form of government can be traced back to 1831. It was in 1891 that the first republican federal constitution was promulgated. The present Constitution has been in operation since 1988, when democracy was re-established. It demonstrates a clear trend to decentralization, intended to bring power closer to the people. Moreover, the 1988 Constitution has been in constant evolution through legislation known as complementary laws. The objectives of the Constitution are to consolidate democracy, to implement decentralization, and to improve social conditions. Meanwhile, the country has been trying to achieve economic stability while struggling against social inequalities and regional disparities. Constitutional rules have been changing over time, to a great extent in order to adapt to the new economic context. Republican federalism as a form of government organization, however, has shown remarkable stability. THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION IN HISTORICAL-CULTURAL CONTEXT Territorial and Demographic Background Brazil occupies 47.7 percent of the South American continent, covering a total of 8,511,965 square kilometres. It has the fifth largest territory in the world, after Russia, Canada, China, and the United States. According to the latest estimated demographic figures, Brazil’s population totalled 174.7 million in 2002.
    [Show full text]