DOCSLIB.ORG

Scaling Considerations for Fire Whirls

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scaling Considerations for Fire Whirls Progress in Scale Modeling, an International Journal Volume 1 Issue 1 Inaugural volume of PSMIJ Article 2 2020 Scaling considerations for fire whirls Forman A. Williams University of California San Diego, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psmij Part of the Architecture Commons, and the Risk Analysis Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits you. Recommended Citation Williams, Forman A. (2020) "Scaling considerations for fire whirls," Progress in Scale Modeling, an International Journal: Vol. 1 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13023/psmij.2020.02 Available at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psmij/vol1/iss1/2 This Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by Progress in Scale Modeling, an International Journal. Questions about the journal can be sent to [email protected] Scaling considerations for fire whirls Category Review Article Abstract This brief report, based on a presentation made at the Eighth International Symposium on Scale Modeling, held in Portland, Oregon, in September of 2017, summarizes and evaluates different methods for classifying fire whirls and their scaling laws. It is indicated that a number of relevant non- dimensional parameters are known for fire whirls, and future scale-modeling experiments could provide useful additional information and insights. Keywords Fire whirl, Vortex breakdown, Rotation Cover Page Footnote This is Review Article in volume 1, 2020 This review article is available in Progress in Scale Modeling, an International Journal: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psmij/vol1/iss1/2 Progress in Scale Modeling, an International Journal, Vol. 1 (2020) Article 2, pp. 1–4 https://doi.org/10.13023/psmij.2020.02 Scaling considerations for fire whirls Forman A. Williams Distinguished Emeritus Professor of Engineering Physics and Combustion, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA E-mail: [email protected] Received May 16, 2020, Accepted May 23, 2020 Abstract This brief report, based on a presentation made at the Eighth International Symposium on Scale Modeling, held in Portland, Oregon, in September of 2017, summarizes and evaluates different methods for classifying fire whirls and their scaling laws. It is indicated that a number of relevant non-dimensional parameters are known for fire whirls, and future scale-modeling experiments could provide useful additional information and insights. Keywords: Fire whirl; Vortex breakdown; Rotation 2. Whirls above fuels in pools or on water. Introduction 3. Tilted fire whirls. It is an honor for me to contribute to this inaugural issue of the International Journal of Progress in Scale 4. Moving fire whirls. Modeling. There are so many different fields of 5. Whirls modified by vortex breakdown. scientific and engineering investigation that can benefit from activities in scale modeling that this journal may Scaling considerations will be addressed first, and be expected to experience a lively future. My comments then they will be applied to each of these five types here, however, will be narrow and specific. They separately. pertain only to a subset of my field of combustion, a particular class of fires that involve swirling motion, General scaling considerations for fire whirls namely, fire whirls. Although scale modeling can help to improve Fire whirls have been found to occur over a wide understanding even when performed purely intuitively range of conditions, and the different types that have (for example by simply building and testing something been encountered can be catalogued in different ways. small that appears to resemble something of interest One approach [1] is to define three different classes, which is too large to be studied conveniently), that is, fire whirls of type 1, which are centered over nevertheless quantitative designs of scale models, burning material, fire whirls of type 2, which move out through the identification and application of relevant from burning material then experience extinction in a non-dimensional parameters, usually will prove to be few seconds, and fire whirls of type 3, which move out more reliable and more revealing. Many years ago I into a protected area but remain burning for a much identified 28 different types of non-dimensional longer time. This classification was developed in scale parameters for combustion, a paper in the present modeling of the large and devastating fire whirl that issue by J. Quintiere lists 22 such parameters for fires in occurred in 1923 in the Hifukusho-ato area of Tokyo general, and 13 parameters have been defined during the great Kanto earthquake, claiming numerous specifically for fire whirls [2]. Yet, even 13 is too large a fatalities, which was an example of type 3. Over the number, in that it is impossible to arrange a scale model years, however, an increasing variety of fire whirls have to maintain that many parameters identical to those of been encountered, motivating broadened classifica- the fire whirl of interest. Reasoned judgment therefore tions. is essential for the scale modeling of fire whirls; One possible approach to classification is to place fire decisions must be made concerning which parameters whirls into five different categories: are likely to be most important, and non-dimensional 1. Whirls generated by fuel distribution in wind. parameters deemed to be of lesser importance then © 2020 The Author(s). This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original author(s) and publication source are credited and that changes (if any) are clearly indicated. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/psmij/ – 1 – PSMIJ, Vol. 1 (2020) Article 2, pp. 1–4 F.A. Williams Fig. 1. Illustration of a fire whirl generated by an L-shaped fuel distribution in wind, a photograph of a scale model. purposely are not forced to be the same in the model as The most eye-catching aspect of fire whirls is their they are at full scale. This is the heart of the art of scale large visible flame lengths. This length will be denoted modeling. by H, the flame height for vertical whirls (although the Burning rates clearly are important in fire whirls. same notation will be retained for tilted fire whirls), its They generally are determined by the rates of heat non-dimensional scaling parameter being H/L. For fires transfer from the flames to the condensed fuel. With L in general H/L scales with a fuel Froude number, = a characteristic length scale and g the acceleration of /( ) / , being approximately proportional to a gravity, D denoting a gas-phase thermal diffusivity near power of1 2that scaling parameter ranging from 2/3 at the fuel surface and the kinematic viscosity there, a large L to 2/5 at small L under turbulent conditions. relevant scaling parameter for a heat-transfer rate This scaling, however is violated by the swirl in fire controlled by natural convection is the Rayleigh whirls. In addition, for a round horizontal fuel source of number, = ( )/( ) , where h is a shorthand radius R, under laminar-flow conditions without swirl, notation for an appropriate3 fractional driving enthalpy taking L = R flame-height correlations for gaseous and difference for theℎ heat-transfer process; the heat- liquid fuels often are based on a Peclet number, defined transfer rate, expressed by a Nusselt number, increases as Pe = RVo/D, according to H/R = Pe/(4f), where f with Ra, the variation depending on geometry and size denotes the stoichiometric fuel-to-air mass ratio (with turbulent flow tending to dominate at large sizes). (typically taking non a small value in this formula). In terms of the gas density and the mass burning Although this would apply to laminar momentum- rate per unit base area of the fuel , an effective controlled gaseous jets, it also has been derived for average normal component of the gas ′′velocity at the laminar round buoyancy-controlled fuel jets, both with surface of the burning fuel can be defined as = and without swirl, and it correlates data for small ( / ). This is determined by the average rate of fuel liquid-pool fires, but there are significant departures gasif′′ ication per unit area, which (through an energy from this scaling at high swirl. In general, flame-height balance ) is the ratio of a heat transfer rate per unit area scaling for fire whirls needs much further investigation, to the energy per unit mass needed to convert the clarifying differences between laminar and turbulent condensed fuel to gas, and although this burning rate conditions without swirl and explaining combined increases with Ra, the specific relationships vary effects of buoyancy and swirl, which are not yet well greatly, depending on what fuel is burning, so that Vo understood. scaling with Ra is strongly fuel-dependent. Moreover, A representative component of velocity along the the swirl in the flow generally exerts a large influence, axis of a fire whirl may be considered to be the velocity as does the fuel orientation, and there are fire whirls in V at an axial distance H from the fuel source. For vertical which radiant energy transfer is dominant, further buoyancy-controlled fires, the order of magnitude of V complicating the scaling problem. Burning-rate scaling is (Hg)1/2, but it may be larger than that at high swirl. thus can become the most challenging scaling aspect of Ambient wind can influence fire whirls, and a fire whirls, to such an extent that, for some purposes, it convenient non-dimensional measure of an average can be useful to decouple the problem by supplying ambient wind velocity U is reasonably defined as U/V.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ABSTRACT This Paper Outlines the Subject Matter of Research
    Invited Lecture An Overview of Research on Wildland Fire FRANK A. ALBINI Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Montana State Univers~ty P.O. Box 173800 Bozeman MT 5971 7-3800 USA ABSTRACT This paper outlines the subject matter of research on the physics and phenomenology of' wildland fire, focusing on topics that bear upon issues of fire control and fire safety. Motivations for research on fire phenomenology are identified as arising from the activities necessary to achieve fire-related objectives, including acceptable levels of fire safety. Differences in the activities, techniques, and tactical objectives for control and prevention of' fires in natural fuels and in manmade structures are noted. Sources of wildland fire research information and operational planning aids are identified, and some cautions are ventured concerning their use by nonspecialists. KEYWORDS: Wildfire, wildland fire, natural fuels INTRODUCTION In preparing an overview of research on wildland fire, it is tempting simply to survey the literature of the field, outlining areas of investigation, pointing out significant findings and tracing the development of knowledge from early investigators to the present state of the art. But to bring such a survey to this audience of distinguished scientists with research interests in fire safety poses a unique challenge. This is because, while this group's efforts are focused mainly upon fire in manmade structures, many of its studies are relevant to, and are applied in, modeling of wildland fire phenomenology. But the converse does not seem to be the case. Results of wildland fire research are seldom cited in the literature of fire safety research as it is done by this audience.
    [Show full text]
  • Naian Liu 2020 Candidate Profile: the Combustion Institute Board of Directors
    The Combustion Institute 5001 Baum Boulevard, Suite 644 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-1851 USA Ph: (412) 687-1366 Fax: (412) 687-0340 [email protected] CombustionInstitute.org Naian Liu 2020 Candidate Profile: The Combustion Institute Board of Directors Reasons for Nomination Although fire has been a topic of interest to the Combustion Institute since its very foundation in 1958, our understanding of fire remains limited. As Hoyt C. Hottel (1903–1998) described, "A case can be made for fire being, next to life processes, the most complex of phenomena to understand". The complexity of fires comes from that there is a huge number of different fires that involve complex interactions among chemical reactions, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics, with diverse scenarios and controlling mechanisms. The discipline of fire science is less mature than other combustion topics, and more decades of fruitful research are required to gain a full understanding of this natural combustion phenomenon. My major motivation for serving the Board of Directors is to promote combustion research in the field of fire science. During the past 20 years, I have been dedicated to the theoretical and experimental studies on the combustion of extreme fire behaviors in large-scale fires. If elected to the Board of Directors, I will endeavor to promote cross-disciplinary research aiming at closer collaboration between combustion science and fire science. I commit to serve the international combustion community with the same rigor and enthusiasm that have enabled me to serve the fire community. See the next page for the candidate’s curriculum vitae. ©2020 The Combustion Institute BIOGRAPHICAL DATA of Naian Liu Naian Liu is currently a professor at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC).
    [Show full text]
  • 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research
    1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 QC 100 .U56 #82-2612- 1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce Ernest Ambler, Director, National Bureau of Standards Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 — FOREWORD The Seventh Annual Conference on Fire Research honors Professor Howard Emmons who retires from Harvard University this year. Professor Emmons has provided leadership and inspiration to many in this field as attested by the breadth and depth of the topics in the conference modeling of fire growth, flame phenomena and spread, diffusion flames and radiation, fire plumes , extinction and suppression— and the contributions of those he has taught. Howard Emmons has demonstrated the viability of scientifically based fire protection engineering practice. Of course, much remains to be done. The conference program and papers (to be published separately) provide a good indication of where we are in a numoer or crt-txcal areas of tare science.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers
    United States Department of Agriculture Synthesis of Knowledge of Forest Service Pacific Northwest Extreme Fire Behavior: Research Station General Technical Volume I for Fire Managers Report PNW-GTR-854 November 2011 Paul A. Werth, Brian E. Potter, Craig B. Clements, Mark A. Finney, Scott L. Goodrick, Martin E. Alexander, Miguel G. Cruz, Jason A. Forthofer, and Sara S. McAllister A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Research and Safety
    INST. OF A111D7 n?^t3 NBS PUBLICATIONS OF r O NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION CO 639 Q * U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/Nationai Bureau of Standards Fire Research and Safety 100 .U57 639 C.2 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act of Congress on March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to promote public safety. The Bureau's technical work is per- formed by the National Measurement Laboratory, the National Engineering Laboratory, and the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology. THE NATIONAL MEASUREMENT LABORATORY provides the national system of physical and chemical and materials measurement; coordinates the system with measurement systems of other nations and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical and chemical measurement throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce; conducts materials research leading to improved methods of measurement, standards, and data on the properties of materials needed by industry, commerce, educational institutions, and Government; provides advisory and research services to other Government agencies; develops, produces, and distributes
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Studies of Fire Whirls (Preliminary)
    Laboratory Studies of Fire Whirls (preliminary) Alexander J. Smits, Katie A. Hartl, Stacy Guo and Frederick L. Dryer Princeton University Coupled Atmosphere‐Bushfire Modelling Workshop 16‐18 May 2012 High Reynolds number in the lab: compressed air up to 200 atm as the working fluid Princeton/ONR Hgh Reynolds number Princeton/DARPA/ONR Superpipe: Test Facility: boundary layer flow Fully-developed pipe flow 3 6 3 3 ReD = 31 x 10 to 35 x 10 Reθ = 5 x 10 to 220 x 10 Re = up to 106 Re⎮ = up to 75,000 τ Reλ = up to 2000 Fric & Roshko, 1994; Kelso & Smits, 1995 QuickTime™ and a h264 decompressor are needed to see this picture. Fire tornado Kentucky “Bourbon,” Josh Grimes Examples of Fire Whirls • Peshtigo Fire, WI – 1871 (>1000 deaths) • Hifukusho-ato, Tokyo – 1923 (~38,000 deaths) • Great Chicago Fire, USA – 1871 • Hiroshima, Dresden Hamburg • Mann Gulch Fire – 1949 (13 deaths) • Indians Fire, CA – 2008 (4 casualties) • (plume shedding, cold fronts, L-shaped fires) Laboratory experiments Rotating screen setup Tangential slit setup (Emmons and Ying, 1966) (Byram and Martin, 1962) Emmons and Ying (1967) Byram and Martin (1962) Previous work • Emmons and Ying (1966) –rotating frame qualitative • Byram and Martin (1962) –fixed frame qualitative • Saito and Cremers (1995) –fixed frame apparatus • Satoh and Yang (1996) –fixed frame qualitative • Hassan (2005) –fixed frame quantitative • Akhmetov (2007) –rotating frame quantitative • Lei (2011) –fixed frame quantitative Fire Whirl Principles Emmons and Ying (1967) Whirls occur: 1.ambient vorticity
    [Show full text]
  • The Prediction of Fire Propagation in Enclosure Fires
    The Prediction of Fire Propagation in Enclosure Fires F. JIA, E.R. GALEA and M.K. PATEL Fire Safety Engineering Group University of Greenwich London SE 18 6PF, UK ABSTRACT In this paper we present some early work concerned with the development of a simple solid fuel combustion model incorporated within a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) framework The model is intended for use in engineering applications of fire field modelling and represents an extension of this technique to situations involving the combustion of solid cellulosic hels A simple solid &el combustion model consisting of a thermal pyrolysis model, a six flux radiation model and an eddy- dissipation model for gaseous combustion have been developed and implemented within the CFD code CFDS-FLOW3D The model is briefly described and demonstrated through two applications involving fire spread in a compartment with a plywood lined ceiling. The two scenarios considered involve a fire in an open and closed compartment The model is shown to be able to qualitatively predict behaviours similar to flashover - in the case of the open room - and backdrafl - in the case of the initially closed room. KEYWORDS: CFD, field model, pyrolysis, solid fuel combustion, flashover, backdraft INTRODUCTION Over the past 10 years considerable effort has been expended in developing fire field models capable of predicting the development of hazardous conditions within fire enclosures[l-41. At the heart of these fire field models is the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code and a large proportion of these models are based on commercial CFD software such as PHOENICS[S] and FLOW3D[6].
    [Show full text]
  • Arnaud Trouvé 2018 Candidate Profile: the Combustion Institute Board of Directors
    The Combustion Institute 5001 Baum Boulevard, Suite 644 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-1851 USA Ph: (412) 687-1366 Fax: (412) 687-0340 [email protected] CombustionInstitute.org Arnaud Trouvé 2018 Candidate Profile: The Combustion Institute Board of Directors Reasons for Nomination I have been involved with The Combustion Institute (CI) through the US Eastern States Section (ESSCI) and the Joint US Sections (USSCI) since 2005 and 2011, respectively. I have served in different capacities: as member or Chair of the Executive Boards of ESSCI/USSCI; as Chair of the Program and Host Committees of ESSCI/USSCI technical meetings; as an organizer of workshops; and as a member of the Editorial Boards of the premier journals in combustion and fire science. I have always been driven by the conviction that the strength of a research community lies as much on the research accomplishments of its individual members as it does on the strength of its infrastructure. The Combustion Arnaud Trouvé Institute is the infrastructure of the combustion science community. I have worked at ESSCI/USSCI towards transforming the US Sections from associations with a limited agenda, primarily focused on organizing the next technical meeting, to associations with a more comprehensive and ambitious agenda. Areas in which I would like to now serve CI at the international level include: outreach activities (general public, students, industry); professional development (early-career development, mentorship program); infrastructure to share teaching material, research tools and data; Summer schools; academia-industry relations; governance; diversity; ethics; publications. See the next page for the candidate’s curriculum vitae. © 2018 The Combustion Institute Arnaud TROUVÉ Professor, Department of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland (UMD) 3104D J.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires Author: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, Daniel T. Gottuk Document No.: 238704 Date Received: May 2012 Award Number: 2008-DN-BX-K168 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. FIRE DYNAMICS AND FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF LIQUID FUEL FIRES Final Report Grant No. 2008-DN-BX-K168 Prepared by: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, and Daniel T. Gottuk Hughes Associates, Inc. 3610 Commerce Drive, Suite 817 Baltimore, MD 21227 Ph. 410-737-8677 FAX 410-737-8688 February 18, 2011 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Science of Wood Combustion
    Proc. Indian Acad. ScL (Engg. Sci.), Vol. 5, Pt. 4, December 1982, pp. 259-268. ~) Printed in India The science of wood combustion HOWARD W EMMONS and ARVIND ATREYA Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138. USA Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to provide an introduction to the physical processes involved in the combustion of wood and other cellulosic fuels. This introduction is aimed towards the utilization of the cellulosic fuels as an energy source. A discussion of a design of the stove is also provided to aid the develop- ment of such a device. Keywords. Pyrolysis;flames; charburning; heat; stove. 1. Introduction Fire from natural causes has been known to man and animals from the beginnings of life on earth. A momentous event occurred when man discovered that fire could be controlled and used in many ways. The easy availability of wood and other cellulosic materials has provided an abundance of natural, renewable energy resource. Even before fire was tamed, man no doubt knew that wood subject to fire first produced white smoke, then flamed, then glowed as a pile of embers and then cooled offas a small pile of grey ashes. Today with our extensive knowledge of the physical laws which govern the universe, our scientific knowledge of many of the details of the wood burning process has begun to be clarified but is far from complete. In this paper, we will briefly review some of what is now known about the burning properties of wood and the resultant fire. The next major step in understanding combustion of any material is summarized in the fire triangle (figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Explosive Combustion in Compartment Fires
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: NUMERICAL SIMULATION OF LOW-PRESSURE EXPLOSIVE COMBUSTION IN COMPARTMENT FIRES Hu Zhixin Doctor of Philosophy, 2008 Dissertation directed by: Professor Arnaud Trouv´e Department of Mechanical Engineering A filtered progress variable approach is adopted for large eddy simulations (LES) of turbulent deflagrations. The deflagration model is coupled with a non- premixed combustion model, either an equilibrium-chemistry, mixture-fraction based model, or an eddy dissipation model. The coupling interface uses a LES-resolved flame index formulation and provides partially-premixed combustion (PPC) model- ing capability. The PPC sub-model is implemented into the Fire Dynamic Simulator (FDS) developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, which is then applied to the study of explosive combustion in confined fuel vapor clouds. Current limitations of the PPC model are identified first in two separate series of simulations: 1) a series of simulation corresponding to laminar flame propaga- tion across homogeneous mixtures in open or closed tunnel-like configurations; and 2) a grid refinement study corresponding to laminar flame propagation across a vertically-stratified layer. An experimental database previously developed by FM Global Research, fea- turing controlled ignition followed by explosive combustion in an enclosure filled with vertically-stratified mixtures of propane in air, is used as a test configuration for model validation. Sealed and vented configurations are both considered, with and without obstacles in the chamber. These pressurized combustion cases present a particular challenge to the bulk pressure algorithm in FDS, which has robustness, accuracy and stability issues, in particular in vented configurations. Two modified bulk pressure models are proposed and evaluated by comparison between measured and simulated pressure data in the Factory Mutual Global (FMG) test configura- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • 12Th U.S. National Combustion Meeting, Texas A&M University
    12th U.S. National Combustion Meeting, Texas A&M University, Virtual Monday, 24 May 2021 Plenary Room 08:50 – 09:00 Welcome and Opening Comments Anthony J. Marchese, Chair, Joint U.S. Sections of the Combustion Institute Board Al Ratner, Program Chair, 12th U.S. National Combustion Meeting Eric L. Petersen, Local Host, 12th U.S. National Combustion Meeting Break 9:00 – 9:10 Room # A B C D E F G H Reacting Kinetics Fire Research I.C. Engines Turbulent Particulates and Bio Laminar Flames Droplets & Spray Session Chair: Session Chair: Session Chair: Combustion Multiphase Flows Session Chair: Session Chair: Session Chair: Session Chair: Session Chair: 09:10 – 09:30 1A01: An 1B01: Analysis 1C01: 1D01: Closure 1E01: An in situ 1F01: The role of 1G01: Planar 1H01: Ignition experimental of effectiveness Implementation modeling for the adaptive pyrolysis and flame initiation probability of kinetics study of of suppression of of a full oxides conditional tabulation based gasification in a and propagation fuels and oils isopropanol lithium ion of nitrogen momentum approach to carbon negative with variable undergoing hot- pyrolysis and battery fires with formation equation in multi-component economy reaction progress surface ignition oxidation behind a clean agent mechanism in a turbulent transcritical flow R.C. Brown G. Xiao, H. Ge, D.S. Teitge, reflected shock A.O. Said, zero-dimensional premixed jet simulation P. Zhao J.C. Thomas, S.I. Stoliarov model of a H. Zhang, S. Yang E.L. Petersen waves flames at low S.P. Cooper, natural gas and high C.M. Grégoire, fueled engine Karlovitz O.
    [Show full text]