DOCSLIB.ORG

Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER Cryptanalysis of Hash

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER Cryptanalysis of Hash Eindhoven University of Technology MASTER Cryptanalysis of hash functions in particular the SHA-3 contenders Shabal and Blake Aerts, N.K.M. Award date: 2011 Link to publication Disclaimer This document contains a student thesis (bachelor's or master's), as authored by a student at Eindhoven University of Technology. Student theses are made available in the TU/e repository upon obtaining the required degree. The grade received is not published on the document as presented in the repository. The required complexity or quality of research of student theses may vary by program, and the required minimum study period may vary in duration. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions In particular the SHA-3 contenders Shabal and Blake Nieke Aerts August 2011 Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions In particular the SHA-3 contenders Shabal and Blake Nieke Aerts Under supervision of Josef Pieprzyk & Benne de Weger Macquarie University & Eindhoven University of Technology August 18, 2011 Abstract Since NIST announced the SHA–3 competition in 2007, many new attacks to hash functions have been born. We tried to understand and apply these new attacks to the second round candidate Shabal and the final round candidate BLAKE. In Chapter 2 we set out the definitions used in this thesis and we describe different attacks. In Chapter 3 we set forth the previous analysis of Shabal and our own ideas. In the same way we discuss BLAKE in Chapter 4. In the last Chapter we discuss the comparison of these two functions. Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 NIST competition . .4 1.1.1 Security Requirements of SHA-3 . .4 1.2 Attacks on Hash functions . .5 1.3 Cryptanalysis in the competition . .5 1.4 Thesis Outline . .5 2 Preliminaries 6 2.1 Hash Function/Hash Algorithm . .6 2.1.1 Cryptographic hash function versus standard hash function . .6 2.1.2 Basic Properties . .6 2.1.3 Applications . .7 2.2 Iterative Hash functions . .7 2.2.1 Padding . .8 2.2.2 Merkle-Damgård . .8 2.3 Cryptanalysis . 10 2.3.1 Security Criteria of Hash functions . 10 2.3.2 (In)Differentiability . 12 2.3.3 Linear Cryptanalysis . 12 2.3.4 Differential Cryptanalysis . 14 2.3.5 Boomerang Attack . 17 2.3.6 Rebound Attack . 18 2.3.7 AIDA/Cube Attack . 19 3 Shabal 22 3.1 The mode of Operation . 22 3.1.1 The Compression function R ........................... 23 3.2 Recent Analysis . 24 3.2.1 On the permutation only . 24 3.2.2 On the compression function R ......................... 25 3.2.3 On full Shabal .................................... 25 3.3 Indifferentiability . 25 3.3.1 The original proof of Indifferentiability . 26 3.4 Indifferentiability with a biased permutation . 36 3.4.1 Conclusion on the Indifferentiability proofs . 48 3.5 Neutral Bits . 48 3.6 Does Shabal differ from a random function . 50 3.7 Message extension Attack . 51 3.8 The initial values . 52 2 Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions 3.8.1 Changing one of the internal variables . 52 3.9 T–functions . 53 3.10 Linear Cryptanalysis . 54 3.11 Expanding the pseudo–collision attack . 54 3.11.1 Finding a near–collision . 55 3.12 Rotational Attack . 56 3.13 Shift Attack . 57 3.14 Differential Attack . 58 3.14.1 Combination of attacks . 59 3.15 Algebraic properties of Shabal ............................... 59 3.15.1 Algebraic collision test for l ≤ log2(r) ...................... 60 3.15.2 Collisions for l > log2(r) ............................. 60 3.15.3 Application to Shabal ................................ 61 3.16 Conclusions on the security of Shabal .......................... 63 3.16.1 Ideas of further Analysis . 63 4 BLAKE 64 4.1 The mode of operation . 64 4.1.1 The compression function . 64 4.1.2 Toy versions of BLAKE [1] ............................. 66 4.2 Recent Analysis . 67 4.2.1 On the inner primitive G ............................. 67 4.2.2 On toy versions . 67 4.2.3 On round–reduced versions . 67 4.3 On the full function . 68 4.4 Properties . 69 4.4.1 The round function is a permutation . 69 4.4.2 Differential Properties . 71 4.4.3 Fixed points of G .................................. 77 4.4.4 On one round . 78 4.4.5 On the compression function . 79 4.4.6 Bounds on the probability of DC’s for BLAKE .................. 79 4.5 Conclusion . 82 5 Comparison between Blake and Shabal 83 5.1 Hardware requirements & speed . 83 5.2 Security . 83 A Notations 90 B on Shabal 92 B.1 Differential Attack of Novotney . 92 C on BLAKE 95 C.1 Initial Values and Constants . 95 C.2 Impossible States . 96 C.3 Proofs on output (D, 0, D0, 0) ................................ 97 C.4 Construction of Fixed Point Algorithms . 113 C.5 Proof on DC’s . 114 D Proofs on combinations of operations 115 Nieke Aerts 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 NIST competition NIST began the standardization of hash algorithms in 1993 when they published the SHA-0 algorithm. Soon after, the algorithm was replaced by SHA-1 due to security issues of SHA-0. In 2001 the Merkle-Damgård based SHA-2 hash family was added to the standard hash algorithms by NIST. In 2005 SHA-1 was theoretically broken which called for the need to use the stronger algorithms of the SHA-2 family. In November 2007 NIST wrote out the request for candidate new hash algorithm families re- ferred to as SHA-3. Up until now, no attack on SHA-2 is known, but a collision in the SHA-2 family would have catastrophic effects for digital signatures. Therefore the new hash family should be able to immediately replace SHA-2 if necessary. The requirements for submissions for the SHA-3 contest were published in [2]. NIST received sixty–four entries in 2008, of which fifty–one advanced to the first round. In 2009 fourteen candidates were selected for the second round. Meanwhile cryptanalysts all over the world were analyzing the candidates. In December 2010 the five finalists were selected, of which one will be selected as winner in the spring of 2012. 1.1.1 Security Requirements of SHA-3 The security requirements were published in [2, Part 4.A]. Here I will state the most important ones considering this thesis1. 1. It should be possible and secure to use the hash family for a wide variety of cryptographic applications, including digital signatures, key derivation, hash-based message authentica- tion codes and deterministic random bit generators. 2. Support HMAC, Pseudo Random Functions (PRF) and Randomized Hashing • the PRF must resist distinguishing attacks that require much fewer than 2n/2 queries and significantly less computation than a preimage attack. • the construction for Randomized Hashing must be resistent to the following attack: the attacker chooses m1, the hashing algorithm processes this message with a to the attacker unknown randomization value r1, now the attacker tries to find a second 1As the research for this thesis consists of Cryptanalysis, we will only state the requirements considering this. 4 Cryptanalysis of Hash Functions message m2 and a randomization value r2 such that m2 with r2 is mapped to the same hash as m1 with r1. The construction should have at least n bits of security. 3. Collision resistance of approximately n/2 bits 4. Preimage resistance of approximately n bits 5. Second-preimage resistance of approximately n − k bits for any message shorter than 2k bits2 6. Resistance to length extension attacks 7. Any m–bit hash function specified by taking a fixed subset of the candidate’s function output bits is expected to meet the above requirements with m replacing n 1.2 Attacks on Hash functions Hash functions are used in many different applications, so an attack in one application is not necessarily an attack on every application. For a hash function to be broken one should be able to find a preimage, a second-preimage or a collision in feasible time. A hash function is computationally broken if one of those can be found with effort less than 2#output bits, but none has been found yet. The security of a hash function is questioned if there is a distinguishing attack, such that the attacker can distinguish the hash output from the output of a random oracle. 1.3 Cryptanalysis in the competition The authors of contending functions and many more cryptologists are currently analyzing the hash fucntions of the SHA–3 contest. Several functions in the first round were broken. All of the second round contenders were thoroughly analyzed. This has helped the committee of NIST to decide which functions progress to the next round. 1.4 Thesis Outline Chapter 2 is a preliminary chapter, it contains a small introduction to hash functions, many notations are borrowed from Menezes, van Oorschot and Vanstone [4], and a description of analysis and some attacks to hash functions. In Appendix A we summarize the notations used in this thesis. The third and fourth chapter are organized identically, they start with a description of the function, secondly an overview of recent work is given, followed by some analysis of my own and ending with a conclusion.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Improved Rectangle Attacks on SKINNY and CRAFT
    Improved Rectangle Attacks on SKINNY and CRAFT Hosein Hadipour1, Nasour Bagheri2 and Ling Song3( ) 1 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, [email protected] 2 Electrical Engineering Department, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University, Tehran, Iran, [email protected] 3 Jinan University, Guangzhou, China [email protected] Abstract. The boomerang and rectangle attacks are adaptions of differential crypt- analysis that regard the target cipher E as a composition of two sub-ciphers, i.e., 2 2 E = E1 ◦ E0, to construct a distinguisher for E with probability p q by concatenat- ing two short differential trails for E0 and E1 with probability p and q respectively. According to the previous research, the dependency between these two differential characteristics has a great impact on the probability of boomerang and rectangle distinguishers. Dunkelman et al. proposed the sandwich attack to formalise such dependency that regards E as three parts, i.e., E = E1 ◦ Em ◦ E0, where Em contains the dependency between two differential trails, satisfying some differential propagation with probability r. Accordingly, the entire probability is p2q2r. Recently, Song et al. have proposed a general framework to identify the actual boundaries of Em and systematically evaluate the probability of Em with any number of rounds, and applied their method to accurately evaluate the probabilities of the best SKINNY’s boomerang distinguishers. In this paper, using a more advanced method to search for boomerang distinguishers, we show that the best previous boomerang distinguishers for SKINNY can be significantly improved in terms of probability and number of rounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardware Performance Evaluation of Authenticated Encryption SAEAES with Threshold Implementation
    cryptography Article Hardware Performance Evaluation of Authenticated Encryption SAEAES with Threshold Implementation Takeshi Sugawara Department of Informatics, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan; [email protected] Received: 30 June 2020; Accepted: 5 August 2020; Published: 9 August 2020 Abstract: SAEAES is the authenticated encryption algorithm instantiated by combining the SAEB mode of operation with AES, and a candidate of the NIST’s lightweight cryptography competition. Using AES gives the advantage of backward compatibility with the existing accelerators and coprocessors that the industry has invested in so far. Still, the newer lightweight block cipher (e.g., GIFT) outperforms AES in compact implementation, especially with the side-channel attack countermeasure such as threshold implementation. This paper aims to implement the first threshold implementation of SAEAES and evaluate the cost we are trading with the backward compatibility. We design a new circuit architecture using the column-oriented serialization based on the recent 3-share and uniform threshold implementation (TI) of the AES S-box based on the generalized changing of the guards. Our design uses 18,288 GE with AES’s occupation reaching 97% of the total area. Meanwhile, the circuit area is roughly three times the conventional SAEB-GIFT implementation (6229 GE) because of a large memory size needed for the AES’s non-linear key schedule and the extended states for satisfying uniformity in TI. Keywords: threshold implementation; SAEAES; authenticated encryption, side-channel attack; changing of the guards; lightweight cryptography; implementation 1. Introduction There is an increasing demand for secure data communication between embedded devices in many areas, including automotive, industrial, and smart-home applications.
    [Show full text]
  • Hash Functions and the (Amplified) Boomerang Attack
    Hash Functions and the (Amplified) Boomerang Attack Antoine Joux1,3 and Thomas Peyrin2,3 1 DGA 2 France T´el´ecomR&D [email protected] 3 Universit´ede Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines [email protected] Abstract. Since Crypto 2004, hash functions have been the target of many at- tacks which showed that several well-known functions such as SHA-0 or MD5 can no longer be considered secure collision free hash functions. These attacks use classical cryptographic techniques from block cipher analysis such as differential cryptanal- ysis together with some specific methods. Among those, we can cite the neutral bits of Biham and Chen or the message modification techniques of Wang et al. In this paper, we show that another tool of block cipher analysis, the boomerang attack, can also be used in this context. In particular, we show that using this boomerang attack as a neutral bits tool, it becomes possible to lower the complexity of the attacks on SHA-1. Key words: hash functions, boomerang attack, SHA-1. 1 Introduction The most famous design principle for dedicated hash functions is indisputably the MD-SHA family, firstly introduced by R. Rivest with MD4 [16] in 1990 and its improved version MD5 [15] in 1991. Two years after, the NIST publishes [12] a very similar hash function, SHA-0, that will be patched [13] in 1995 to give birth to SHA-1. This family is still very active, as NIST recently proposed [14] a 256-bit new version SHA-256 in order to anticipate the potential cryptanalysis results and also to increase its security with regard to the fast growth of the computation power.
    [Show full text]
  • Boomerang Analysis Method Based on Block Cipher
    International Journal of Security and Its Application Vol.11, No.1 (2017), pp.165-178 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijsia.2017.11.1.14 Boomerang Analysis Method Based on Block Cipher Fan Aiwan and Yang Zhaofeng Computer School, Pingdingshan University, Pingdingshan, 467002 Henan province, China { Fan Aiwan} [email protected] Abstract This paper fused together the related key analysis and differential analysis and did multiple rounds of attack analysis for the DES block cipher. On the basis of deep analysis of Boomerang algorithm principle, combined with the characteristics of the key arrangement of the DES block cipher, the 8 round DES attack experiment and the 9 round DES attack experiment were designed based on the Boomerang algorithm. The experimental results show that, after the design of this paper, the value of calculation complexity of DES block cipher is only 240 and the analysis performance is greatly improved by the method of Boomerang attack. Keywords: block cipher, DES, Boomerang, Computational complexity 1. Introduction With the advent of the information society, especially the extensive application of the Internet to break the traditional limitations of time and space, which brings great convenience to people. However, at the same time, a large amount of sensitive information is transmitted through the channel or computer network, especially the rapid development of e-commerce and e-government, more and more personal information such as bank accounts require strict confidentiality, how to guarantee the security of information is particularly important [1-2]. The essence of information security is to protect the information system or the information resources in the information network from various types of threats, interference and destruction, that is, to ensure the security of information [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Rotational Cryptanalysis of ARX
    Rotational Cryptanalysis of ARX Dmitry Khovratovich and Ivica Nikoli´c University of Luxembourg [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. In this paper we analyze the security of systems based on modular additions, rotations, and XORs (ARX systems). We provide both theoretical support for their security and practical cryptanalysis of real ARX primitives. We use a technique called rotational cryptanalysis, that is universal for the ARX systems and is quite efficient. We illustrate the method with the best known attack on reduced versions of the block cipher Threefish (the core of Skein). Additionally, we prove that ARX with constants are functionally complete, i.e. any function can be realized with these operations. Keywords: ARX, cryptanalysis, rotational cryptanalysis. 1 Introduction A huge number of symmetric primitives using modular additions, bitwise XORs, and intraword rotations have appeared in the last 20 years. The most famous are the hash functions from MD-family (MD4, MD5) and their descendants SHA-x. While modular addition is often approximated with XOR, for random inputs these operations are quite different. Addition provides diffusion and nonlinearity, while XOR does not. Although the diffusion is relatively slow, it is compensated by a low price of addition in both software and hardware, so primitives with relatively high number of additions (tens per byte) are still fast. The intraword rotation removes disbalance between left and right bits (introduced by the ad- dition) and speeds up the diffusion. Many recently design primitives use only XOR, addition, and rotation so they are grouped into a single family ARX (Addition-Rotation-XOR).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Ciphers • A
    ECE 646 - Lecture 6 Required Reading • W. Stallings, Cryptography and Network Security, Chapter 2, Classical Encryption Techniques Historical Ciphers • A. Menezes et al., Handbook of Applied Cryptography, Chapter 7.3 Classical ciphers and historical development Why (not) to study historical ciphers? Secret Writing AGAINST FOR Steganography Cryptography (hidden messages) (encrypted messages) Not similar to Basic components became modern ciphers a part of modern ciphers Under special circumstances modern ciphers can be Substitution Transposition Long abandoned Ciphers reduced to historical ciphers Transformations (change the order Influence on world events of letters) Codes Substitution The only ciphers you Ciphers can break! (replace words) (replace letters) Selected world events affected by cryptology Mary, Queen of Scots 1586 - trial of Mary Queen of Scots - substitution cipher • Scottish Queen, a cousin of Elisabeth I of England • Forced to flee Scotland by uprising against 1917 - Zimmermann telegram, America enters World War I her and her husband • Treated as a candidate to the throne of England by many British Catholics unhappy about 1939-1945 Battle of England, Battle of Atlantic, D-day - a reign of Elisabeth I, a Protestant ENIGMA machine cipher • Imprisoned by Elisabeth for 19 years • Involved in several plots to assassinate Elisabeth 1944 – world’s first computer, Colossus - • Put on trial for treason by a court of about German Lorenz machine cipher 40 noblemen, including Catholics, after being implicated in the Babington Plot by her own 1950s – operation Venona – breaking ciphers of soviet spies letters sent from prison to her co-conspirators stealing secrets of the U.S. atomic bomb in the encrypted form – one-time pad 1 Mary, Queen of Scots – cont.
    [Show full text]
  • The SKINNY Family of Block Ciphers and Its Low-Latency Variant MANTIS (Full Version)
    The SKINNY Family of Block Ciphers and its Low-Latency Variant MANTIS (Full Version) Christof Beierle1, J´er´emy Jean2, Stefan K¨olbl3, Gregor Leander1, Amir Moradi1, Thomas Peyrin2, Yu Sasaki4, Pascal Sasdrich1, and Siang Meng Sim2 1 Horst G¨ortzInstitute for IT Security, Ruhr-Universit¨atBochum, Germany [email protected] 2 School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences Nanyang Technological University, Singapore [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 3 DTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark [email protected] 4 NTT Secure Platform Laboratories, Japan [email protected] Abstract. We present a new tweakable block cipher family SKINNY, whose goal is to compete with NSA recent design SIMON in terms of hardware/software perfor- mances, while proving in addition much stronger security guarantees with regards to differential/linear attacks. In particular, unlike SIMON, we are able to provide strong bounds for all versions, and not only in the single-key model, but also in the related-key or related-tweak model. SKINNY has flexible block/key/tweak sizes and can also benefit from very efficient threshold implementations for side-channel protection. Regarding performances, it outperforms all known ciphers for ASIC round-based implementations, while still reaching an extremely small area for serial implementations and a very good efficiency for software and micro-controllers im- plementations (SKINNY has the smallest total number of AND/OR/XOR gates used for encryption process). Secondly, we present MANTIS, a dedicated variant of SKINNY for low-latency imple- mentations, that constitutes a very efficient solution to the problem of designing a tweakable block cipher for memory encryption.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Open Research Problems in Cryptography by Surveying Cryptographic Functions and Operations 1
    International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing Vol. 10, No. 11 (2017), pp.79-98 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijgdc.2017.10.11.08 Identifying Open Research Problems in Cryptography by Surveying Cryptographic Functions and Operations 1 Rahul Saha1, G. Geetha2, Gulshan Kumar3 and Hye-Jim Kim4 1,3School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India 2Division of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India 4Business Administration Research Institute, Sungshin W. University, 2 Bomun-ro 34da gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea Abstract Cryptography has always been a core component of security domain. Different security services such as confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, non-repudiation and access control, are provided by a number of cryptographic algorithms including block ciphers, stream ciphers and hash functions. Though the algorithms are public and cryptographic strength depends on the usage of the keys, the ciphertext analysis using different functions and operations used in the algorithms can lead to the path of revealing a key completely or partially. It is hard to find any survey till date which identifies different operations and functions used in cryptography. In this paper, we have categorized our survey of cryptographic functions and operations in the algorithms in three categories: block ciphers, stream ciphers and cryptanalysis attacks which are executable in different parts of the algorithms. This survey will help the budding researchers in the society of crypto for identifying different operations and functions in cryptographic algorithms. Keywords: cryptography; block; stream; cipher; plaintext; ciphertext; functions; research problems 1. Introduction Cryptography [1] in the previous time was analogous to encryption where the main task was to convert the readable message to an unreadable format.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiplicative Differentials
    Multiplicative Differentials Nikita Borisov, Monica Chew, Rob Johnson, and David Wagner University of California at Berkeley Abstract. We present a new type of differential that is particularly suited to an- alyzing ciphers that use modular multiplication as a primitive operation. These differentials are partially inspired by the differential used to break Nimbus, and we generalize that result. We use these differentials to break the MultiSwap ci- pher that is part of the Microsoft Digital Rights Management subsystem, to derive a complementation property in the xmx cipher using the recommended modulus, and to mount a weak key attack on the xmx cipher for many other moduli. We also present weak key attacks on several variants of IDEA. We conclude that cipher designers may have placed too much faith in multiplication as a mixing operator, and that it should be combined with at least two other incompatible group opera- ¡ tions. 1 Introduction Modular multiplication is a popular primitive for ciphers targeted at software because many CPUs have built-in multiply instructions. In memory-constrained environments, multiplication is an attractive alternative to S-boxes, which are often implemented us- ing large tables. Multiplication has also been quite successful at foiling traditional dif- ¢ ¥ ¦ § ferential cryptanalysis, which considers pairs of messages of the form £ ¤ £ or ¢ ¨ ¦ § £ ¤ £ . These differentials behave well in ciphers that use xors, additions, or bit permutations, but they fall apart in the face of modular multiplication. Thus, we con- ¢ sider differential pairs of the form £ ¤ © £ § , which clearly commute with multiplication. The task of the cryptanalyst applying multiplicative differentials is to find values for © that allow the differential to pass through the other operations in a cipher.
    [Show full text]
  • Biryukov, Shamir, “Wagner: Real Time Cryptanalysis of A5/1 on a PC,”
    Reference Papers [S1] Biryukov, Shamir, “Wagner: Real Time Cryptanalysis of A5/1 on a PC,” FSE2000 [S2] Canteaut, Filiol, “Ciphertext Only Reconstruction of Stream Ciphers based on Combination Generator,” FSE2000 [S3] Chepyzhov, Johansson, Smeets, “A simple algorithm for fast correlation attacks on stream ciphers,” FSE2000 [S4] Ding, “The Differential Cryptanalysis and Design of Natural Stream Ciphers,” Fast Software Encryption, Cambridge Security Workshop, December 1993, LNCS 809 [S5] Ding, Xiao, Sham, “The Stability Theory of Stream Ciphers,” LNCS 561 [S6] Johansson, Jonsson, “Fast correlation attacks based on Turbo code techniques,” CRYPTO’99, August 99, 19th Annual International Cryptology Conference, LNCS 1666 [S7] Fossorier, Mihaljevic, Imai, “Critical Noise for Convergence of Iterative Probabilistic Decoding with Belief Propagation in Cryptographic Applications,” LNCS 1719. [S8] Golic, “Linear Cryptanalysis of Stream Ciphers,” Fast Software Encryption, Second International Workshop, December 1994, LNCS 1008. [S9] Johansson, Jonsson, “Improved Fast Correlation Attacks in Stream Ciphers via Convolutional codes,” EUROCRYPT’99, International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, May 1999, LNCS 1592 [S10] Meier, Staffelbach, “Correlation Properties of Comniners with Memory in Stream Ciphers,” Journal of Cryptology 5(1992) [S11] Palit, Roy, “Cryptanalysis of LFSR-Encrypted Codes with Unknown Combining,” LNCS 1716 [S12] Ruppel, “Correlation Immunity and Summation Generator,” CRYPTO’85 Proceedings, August 85, LNCS 218. [S13] Sigenthalar, “Decrypting a class of Ciphers using Ciphertext only,” IEEE C-34. [S14] Tanaka, Ohishi, Kaneko, “An Optimized Linear Attack on Pseudorandom Generators using a Non-Linear Combiner, Information Security,” First International Workshop, ISW’97 Proceedings, September 1997, LNCS 1396 [S15] Zeng, Huang, “On the Linear Syndrome Method in Cryptanalysis,” CRYPTO’88 Proceedings, August 1988, LNCS 403.
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Way Ball Valves
    Multi-way ball valves 71 • with floating ball 74 • with threaded connector 74 • as combination (see 2-way ball valves) 36 • with ISO-flange connection (SAE) 84 • for manifold mounting 86 • for manifold insertion as cartridge type 88 • with trunnion ball 90 • with threaded connector 90 • as combination 98 • for manifold mounting 100 Table of contents Table 3 Multi-way ball valves overview with floating ball with trunnion ball Product 70 71 Multi-way ball valves Multi-way ball valves Standard- and special porting patterns Special porting patterns · examples for combinations Porting position Cross-over position By combining simple patterns more complex functions can be achieved. Ref-No. Ball valve style Cycling Porting symbols Descriptions 3-way compact 2 Floating ball, all ports connected in the 01 ball valve 90° 3 1 cross-over position, pressure should 2 13 with L-bore not be applied from the closed port 3-way compact 2 Floating ball, all ports connected in the 03 ball valve 90° 3 1 cross-over position, pressure should 13 with T-bore 2 not be applied from the closed port 2 3-way ball valve Trunnion ball, all ports closed in the 08 90° 3 1 with L-bore 2 13 cross-over position, full bore 2 3-way ball valve 3 1 Trunnion ball, all ports closed in the 09 90° with T-bore 2 13 cross-over position, full bore 2 Trunnion ball, all ports closed in the cross- 3-way ball valve 10 2 x 90° 3 1 over position, full bore, detent at center with T-bore 2 13 position is recommended 4 4-way ball valve 2 4 Trunnion ball, all ports closed in the 11 90° 3 1 with
    [Show full text]
  • AES3 Presentation
    Cryptanalytic Progress: Lessons for AES John Kelsey1, Niels Ferguson1, Bruce Schneier1, and Mike Stay2 1 Counterpane Internet Security, Inc., 3031 Tisch Way, 100 Plaza East, San Jose, CA 95128, USA 2 AccessData Corp., 2500 N University Ave. Ste. 200, Provo, UT 84606, USA 1 Introduction The cryptanalytic community is currently evaluating five finalist algorithms for the AES. Within the next year, one or more ciphers will be chosen. In this note, we argue caution in selecting a finalist with a small security margin. Known attacks continuously improve over time, and it is impossible to predict future cryptanalytic advances. If an AES algorithm chosen today is to be encrypting data twenty years from now (that may need to stay secure for another twenty years after that), it needs to be a very conservative algorithm. In this paper, we review cryptanalytic progress against three well-regarded block ciphers and discuss the development of new cryptanalytic tools against these ciphers over time. This review illustrates how cryptanalytic progress erodes a cipher’s security margin. While predicting such progress in the future is clearly not possible, we claim that assuming that no such progress can or will occur is dangerous. Our three examples are DES, IDEA, and RC5. These three ciphers have fundamentally different structures and were designed by entirely different groups. They have been analyzed by many researchers using many different techniques. More to the point, each cipher has led to the development of new cryptanalytic techniques that not only have been applied to that cipher, but also to others. 2 DES DES was developed by IBM in the early 1970s, and standardized made into a standard by NBS (the predecessor of NIST) [NBS77].
    [Show full text]