DOCSLIB.ORG

Iranian Threat About Washington Forum

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DECEMBER 8 - 10, 2010 Report from the Washington Forum Countering the Iranian Threat About Washington Forum Washington Forum, FDD’s annual policy summit, brings together a diverse list of foreign policy and national security professionals from Congress, the White House, the Departments of State, Defense, Treasury, Justice, and Energy, the CIA, the FBI, and the Joint Chiefs, as well as diplomats, scholars and journalists for discussions and debates about pressing national security issues. Last year, Washington Forum focused on countering the Iranian threat and took place just days after the latest round of nuclear negotiations with Iran got underway. Panels centered on the various threats a nuclear Iran poses to U.S. national security, Israel and other nations, and examined the policy options aimed at halting Iran’s nuclear weapons acquisition and its sponsorship of terrorism. Washington Forum provided an opportunity for stakeholders to interact with each other and for policy ideas to germinate. We invite you to watch the footage from Washington Forum 2010 which among other sessions, includes remarks by White House official Gary Samore, Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL), Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA), and Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R-MI). A highlights video is also available at www. FDDWashingtonForum.org . Washington Forum 2010 Host Committee Chair: Bernie Marcus Kenneth and Nira Abramowitz Larry J. Hochberg Alan and Suzanne K. Peyser Mark and Paula Argosh Daniel and Angela Japha Mark Pruzanski Paul Bishop Len and Michelle Leader Kenneth Schwartz Edgar M. Bronfman Frederick J. Manning Dianne Sehler and The Lynde and Ambassador Richard and Carol and Larry A. Mizel Harry Bradley Foundation Patricia Carlson Charles Moed Robert J. Shillman (“Doctor Bob”) David and Ruth Naftaly 4 A Letter from R. James Woolsey, Cliff May and Mark Dubowitz In the months following FDD’s “Washington Forum 2010: Countering the Iranian Threat,” fears of a nuclear showdown in the Middle East have given way to upheaval in Egypt, Tunisia, Libya and beyond. Yet as the “Arab Spring” dominates the headlines, Iran is meddling in the affairs of Washington’s R. James Woolsey, Chairman, FDD allies, and continuing its march toward a nuclear weapon. The Obama administration recognizes the gravity of an Iranian nuclear threat. As Washington Forum speaker and Pulitzer-prize winning New York Times columnist David Sanger reports, “Every decision — from Libya to Yemen to Bahrain to Syria — is being examined under the prism of how it will affect…the dominating calculus in the Obama administration’s regional strategy: how to slow Iran’s nuclear progress.” In his remarks at the Washington Forum, Gary Samore, White House Coordinator for Weapons of Mass Destruction, Counter-terrorism and Arms Control, explained why the White House sees the situation through an Iranian prism: “Iran’s efforts to acquire nuclear weapons capability poses one of the most serious Cliff May, President, FDD international security threats that this country faces.” Congress, too, remains determined to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. In February 2011, Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL) — another Washington Forum speaker — and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) co-sponsored the Iran Transparency and Accountability Act with U.S. Representatives Ted Deutch (D-FL) and Dan Burton (R-IN). In April, Representative Brad Sherman (D-CA), Washington Forum speaker, and Representative Ed Royce (R-CA) introduced the Stop Iran’s Nuclear Weapons Program Act, which seeks to strengthen the measures President Obama signed into law in the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act (CISADA), Mark Dubowitz, Executive Director, FDD barring U.S. firms from developing Iran’s energy sector and reducing Iran’s access to the international financial system. Senators Mark Kirk (R-IL) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Congressmen Robert Dold (R-IL) and Ted Deutch (D-FL) have also introduced the Iran Human Rights and Democracy Promotion Act of 2011 to promote human rights and democratic reform, targeting individuals and international companies that are involved in oppressing the Iranian people. FDD remains committed to preventing an Iranian nuclear weapon. In the months following Washington Forum, FDD has turned many of the ideas discussed at the Forum into action. Calls by the Honorable Irwin Cotler and Ambassador Uri Lubrani to pressure the regime over its human rights violations and sponsorship of terrorism resulted in the creation of FDD’s Iran Human Rights Project. FDD’s Iran Energy Project continues to monitor companies that do business with Iran, and develop new means to squeeze the “We need to send a message sanctions regime. Our scholars, including Reuel Marc Gerecht, Emanuele to Iran that sanctions will only Ottolenghi, Jonathan Schanzer, Claudia Rosett, Benjamin Weinthal and Michael Ledeen, have published hundreds of articles in leading media increase as Iran avoids serious outlets on the nuclear threat. negotiations, and will not be This booklet contains a compilation of the most memorable insights from lifted until our concerns are Washington Forum, including analysis relating to Iran and other pressing fully addressed.” international conflicts. — Dr. Gary Samore Attendees will recall FDD advisor and Wall Street Journal columnist Bret White House Coordinator Stephens moderating a lively debate on Middle East peace with Ghaith al- Omari, former foreign policy advisor to then-Palestinian Prime Minister for Weapons of Mass Mahmoud Abbas, Aaron David Miller, former Middle East peace negotiator Destruction (WMD), under Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, and Jonathan Schanzer, author of Hamas v. Fatah and FDD’s Vice President of Research. FDD’s key Counter-terrorism and Arms supporters participated in an intimate breakfast conversation with former Control Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and a timely private conversation with FDD Senior Fellow and Long War Journal editor Bill Roggio. For those who weren’t able to join us, we are pleased to share the highlights with you in the following pages and we hope you will consider joining us next year. This year’s Washington Forum, taking place December 7-9, 2011, promises to be equally memorable. Commemorating the anniversary of 9/11, Washington Forum 2011 participants will engage the best and brightest on the national security challenges we face a decade after the attacks. We hope you enjoy the following Washington Forum 2010 highlights, and we look forward to seeing you in December for Washington Forum 2011. Best regards, R. James Woolsey Clifford D. May Mark Dubowitz Chairman President Executive Director 2 Speaker Biographies Major General AMBASSADOR The (ret.) Yaakov Richard HONORABLE Amidror Carlson Irwin COTLER is the National Security is Vice Chairman of the is a former Canadian Advisor to Israel’s Prime Foundation for Defense Attorney General and Minister. Previously, of Democracies. He current Liberal Party MP. he was the program writes a syndicated He is currently serving director of the Institute for Contemporary newspaper column and hosts the “Danger as Liberal Special Counsel on Human Rights & Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Zone” radio show on WMAL in Washington, International Justice, is a member of the House Affairs. He also served as the commander of DC. From 1991-1992, he was the U.S. of Commons Foreign Affairs Subcommittee the Israeli Defense Force’s National Defense Ambassador to the Republic of Seychelles. on International Human Rights, and Chair College and the IDF Staff and Command Previously, he was director of the Voice of of the All-Party Save Darfur Parliamentary College. Maj. Gen. Amidror also headed the America. Ambassador Carlson was a member Coalition. A leading public advocate in IDF’s Research and Assessment Division of the U.S. delegation to the annual U.S.-USSR and out of Parliament for the Human Rights with special responsibility for preparing the Information Talks in Moscow and Washington, Agenda, he headed the Canadian Delegation National Intelligence Assessment, and he D.C. He led official U.S. government delegations to the Stockholm International Forum on served as military secretary for the Minister to the People’s Republic of China, to Georgia, the Prevention of Genocide. Irwin Cotler has of Defense. He is the author of Thoughts About the USSR, and to Moldavia, USSR. He has been been variously described as being “at the Security and Military Affairs (Israel National involved in negotiations on behalf of the U.S. forefront of the struggle for justice, peace and Security College, 2002) and Intelligence: Theory government with many foreign governments, human rights.” and Practice (Ministry of Defense Publishing including those of China, Korea, the USSR, House, 2006). Germany, Costa Rica, Belize, Liberia, Botswana, TOM DELARE Lesotho, South Africa, Morocco and Israel. is the Director for TONY BADRAN Terrorism Finance and is a Research Fellow The Sanctions Policy in at the Foundation HONORABLE the Economic Bureau for Defense of Michael of the Department Democracies. His Chertoff of State. Previously, research focuses on was the second Mr. Delare had worked at both the U.S. Lebanon, Syria and S e c r e t a r y o f Embassy in Rome, Italy (2006-2009) as Hezbollah, their regional and international t h e Department of well as the Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq (2005- relations, and Islamist groups in the Levant. Mr. Homeland Security. Previously, he was the 2006), serving as Minister Counselor for Badran is the author
Recommended publications
  • Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS): an Al-Qaeda Affiliate Case Study Pamela G

    Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS): an Al-Qaeda Affiliate Case Study Pamela G

    Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS): An Al-Qaeda Affiliate Case Study Pamela G. Faber and Alexander Powell October 2017 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Distribution DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A. Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. SPECIFIC AUTHORITY: N00014-16-D-5003 10/27/2017 Request additional copies of this document through [email protected]. Photography Credit: Michael Markowitz, CNA. Approved by: October 2017 Dr. Jonathan Schroden, Director Center for Stability and Development Center for Strategic Studies This work was performed under Federal Government Contract No. N00014-16-D-5003. Copyright © 2017 CNA Abstract Section 1228 of the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) states: “The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall provide for the conduct of an independent assessment of the effectiveness of the United States’ efforts to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat Al- Qaeda, including its affiliated groups, associated groups, and adherents since September 11, 2001.” The Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations/Low Intensity Conflict (ASD (SO/LIC)) asked CNA to conduct this independent assessment, which was completed in August 2017. In order to conduct this assessment, CNA used a comparative methodology that included eight case studies on groups affiliated or associated with Al-Qaeda. These case studies were then used as a dataset for cross-case comparison. This document is a stand-alone version of the Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent (AQIS) case study used in the Independent Assessment.
  • Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan

    Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan

    Fall 08 September 2012 Living Under Drones Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians From US Drone Practices in Pakistan International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic Stanford Law School Global Justice Clinic http://livingunderdrones.org/ NYU School of Law Cover Photo: Roof of the home of Faheem Qureshi, a then 14-year old victim of a January 23, 2009 drone strike (the first during President Obama’s administration), in Zeraki, North Waziristan, Pakistan. Photo supplied by Faheem Qureshi to our research team. Suggested Citation: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONFLICT RESOLUTION CLINIC (STANFORD LAW SCHOOL) AND GLOBAL JUSTICE CLINIC (NYU SCHOOL OF LAW), LIVING UNDER DRONES: DEATH, INJURY, AND TRAUMA TO CIVILIANS FROM US DRONE PRACTICES IN PAKISTAN (September, 2012) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I ABOUT THE AUTHORS III EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS V INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 2 CHALLENGES 4 CHAPTER 1: BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 7 DRONES: AN OVERVIEW 8 DRONES AND TARGETED KILLING AS A RESPONSE TO 9/11 10 PRESIDENT OBAMA’S ESCALATION OF THE DRONE PROGRAM 12 “PERSONALITY STRIKES” AND SO-CALLED “SIGNATURE STRIKES” 12 WHO MAKES THE CALL? 13 PAKISTAN’S DIVIDED ROLE 15 CONFLICT, ARMED NON-STATE GROUPS, AND MILITARY FORCES IN NORTHWEST PAKISTAN 17 UNDERSTANDING THE TARGET: FATA IN CONTEXT 20 PASHTUN CULTURE AND SOCIAL NORMS 22 GOVERNANCE 23 ECONOMY AND HOUSEHOLDS 25 ACCESSING FATA 26 CHAPTER 2: NUMBERS 29 TERMINOLOGY 30 UNDERREPORTING OF CIVILIAN CASUALTIES BY US GOVERNMENT SOURCES 32 CONFLICTING MEDIA REPORTS 35 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
  • Israel and Lebanon Sign Agreement at 2 Ceremonies

    Israel and Lebanon Sign Agreement at 2 Ceremonies

    Page 1 135 of 220 DOCUMENTS The New York Times May 18, 1983, Wednesday, Late City Final Edition ISRAEL AND LEBANON SIGN AGREEMENT AT 2 CEREMONIES BYLINE: By DAVID K. SHIPLER, Special to the New York Times SECTION: Section A; Page 16, Column 1; Foreign Desk LENGTH: 1687 words DATELINE: JERUSALEM, May 17 Israel and Lebanon signed a security agreement today that is intended to lead to the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Lebanon and continuing Israeli involvement in policing the country's southern region. The agreement came nearly a year after Israel invaded Lebanon on June 6, 1982, with the stated goals of helping to install a Government more acceptable to the Israelis, diminishing Syrian influence in Lebanon and ousting guerrillas of the Palestine Liberation Organization from their military bases and political headquarters. In the hope of consolidating these gains, Israel has made its troop withdrawal and the carrying out of the rest of the agreement contingent upon the withdrawal of P.L.O. and Syrian forces from the north and east of Lebanon. The return of all Israelis held as prisoners of war and an accounting of Israelis missing in action are also prerequisites for an Israeli pullout. The agreement will be technically completed upon the exchange of instruments of ratification, a formality said to involve another approval by Israel's Cabinet and Lebanon's Parliament. Officials expect this to take place within a week. But no aspect of the accord is to go into effect until the Israeli withdrawal. Successful but Fragile The agreement, which the United States endorsed as a witness, was a step less than a full peace treaty.
  • Men and Boys: Representations of Israeli Combat Soldiers in the Media

    Men and Boys: Representations of Israeli Combat Soldiers in the Media

    Men and Boys Representations of Israeli Combat Soldiers in the Media Zipi Israeli and Elisheva Rosman-Stollman ABstrAct: In this article we examine the representation of combat sol- diers in Israel through their media image. Using two major national Israeli newspapers, we follow the presentation of the Israeli combat soldier over three decades. Our findings indicate that the combat soldier begins as a hegemonic masculine figure in the 1980s, shifts to a more vulnerable, frightened child in the 1990s, and attains a more complex framing in the 2000s. While this most recent representation returns to a hegemonic mas- culine one, it includes additional, ‘softer’ components. We find that the transformation in the image of the Israeli soldier reflects changes within Israeli society in general during the period covered and is also indicative of global changes in masculinity to a certain extent. We conclude by ana- lyzing two possible explanations: the perception of the threat and changes in the perception of masculine identity. Keywords: identity, IDF, Israeli society, masculinity, media image, mili- tary service, representation, soldier The twenty-first century has encouraged the discussion of representations, and the representation of soldiers is no exception. In the present article, we focus on a specific aspect and social context of such a representation: the combat soldier in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). In this study, we explore how the Israeli media framed and constructed the image of the combat sol- dier1 in the IDF over the course of the past three decades (1980s–2000s). In order to examine the changes in the representation of the Israeli soldier, we concentrate on events of a clear combat nature that involve the presence of a defined external enemy.
  • The United States and Democracy Promotion in Iraq and Lebanon in the Aftermath of the Events of 9/11 and the 2003 Iraq War

    The United States and Democracy Promotion in Iraq and Lebanon in the Aftermath of the Events of 9/11 and the 2003 Iraq War

    The United States and democracy promotion in Iraq and Lebanon in the aftermath of the events of 9/11 and the 2003 Iraq War A Thesis Submitted to the Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of PhD. in Political Science. By Abess Taqi Ph.D. candidate, University of London Internal Supervisors Dr. James Chiriyankandath (Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London) Professor Philip Murphy (Director, Institute of Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London) External Co-Supervisor Dr. Maria Holt (Reader in Politics, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Westminster) © Copyright Abess Taqi April 2015. All rights reserved. 1 | P a g e DECLARATION I hereby declare that this thesis is my own work and effort and that it has not been submitted anywhere for any award. Where other sources of information have been used, they have been duly acknowledged. Signature: ………………………………………. Date: ……………………………………………. 2 | P a g e Abstract This thesis features two case studies exploring the George W. Bush Administration’s (2001 – 2009) efforts to promote democracy in the Arab world, following military occupation in Iraq, and through ‘democracy support’ or ‘democracy assistance’ in Lebanon. While reviewing well rehearsed arguments that emphasise the inappropriateness of the methods employed to promote Western liberal democracy in Middle East countries and the difficulties in the way of democracy being fostered by foreign powers, it focuses on two factors that also contributed to derailing the U.S.’s plans to introduce ‘Western style’ liberal democracy to Iraq and Lebanon.
  • Testimony of Thomas Joscelyn Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense Of

    Testimony of Thomas Joscelyn Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense Of

    Testimony of Thomas Joscelyn Senior Fellow, Foundation for Defense of Democracies Senior Editor, The Long War Journal Before the House Committee on Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Terrorism, Nonproliferation, and Trade United States Congress “Global al-Qaeda: Affiliates, Objectives, and Future Challenges” July 18, 2013 1 Chairman Poe, Ranking Member Sherman and members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me here today to discuss the threat posed by al Qaeda. We have been asked to “examine the nature of global al Qaeda today.” In particular, you asked us to answer the following questions: “What is [al Qaeda’s] makeup? Is there a useful delineation between al Qaeda’s core and its affiliates? If so, what is the relationship? Most importantly, what is the threat of al Qaeda to the United States today?” I provide my answers to each of these questions in the following sections. But first, I will summarize my conclusions: • More than a decade after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks there is no commonly accepted definition of al Qaeda. There is, in fact, widespread disagreement over what exactly al Qaeda is. • In my view, al Qaeda is best defined as a global international terrorist network, with a general command in Afghanistan and Pakistan and affiliates in several countries. Together, they form a robust network that, despite setbacks, contests for territory abroad and still poses a threat to U.S. interests both overseas and at home. • It does not make sense to draw a firm line between al Qaeda’s “core,” which is imprecisely defined, and the affiliates.
  • Yeshiva of New Haven Edgewood Elm Housing

    Yeshiva of New Haven Edgewood Elm Housing

    YESHIVA OF NEW HAVEN ·- EDGEWOOD ELM HOUSING Thirty-'Fifth cA"nniversary (jathering in honor of HONORABLE MARTIN M. LOONEY CONNECTICUT STATE SENATE MAJORITY LEADER Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History N ew Haven, Connecticut 29 Sivan 5772 j une 19, 2012 /\.~ ~'~' :>j>)l·~ ~ ,.$ 7·~. ODD _, ooo ~e. f, DOD .S DOD f. DOD J DOD ______________ .r DOD ~ ~ DOD DOD ~ ------------------------------------ DOD Program Greeting .... ............... ....................Rabbi Mordechai E. Feuerstein Spiritual Leader, Suburban Torah Center - Livingston, New Jersey Address ...........................................Robert C. 'Bud' McFarlane Chairman and CEO, McFarlane Associates, Inc. National Security Advisor to President Ronald Reagan Civic Achievement Award ........................ Honorable Martin M. Looney Connecticut State Senate Majority Leader Remarks ............. ............................... ....... .Clifford D. May President, Foundation for Defense of Democracies Presentation ....... .. ................................. .. Rabbi Daniel Greer Founder and President Edgewood Elm Housing & Yeshiva of New Haven Salutation ......................................Honorable John DeStefano, Jr. Mayor, City of New Haven Appreciation ............................................Rabbi Aviad S. Hack Joumal Chairman The Chairman of the Program this evening is Honorable John A. Keyes, Judge, New Haven Probate Court /\.~ ~'~' :>j>l>·~ ~ ..$' l·u ODD -!' ooo ~e DOD t 6 DOD ___________________________________________________________________ ? BBBDOD 4 The
  • Left in the Dark

    Left in the Dark

    LEFT IN THE DARK FAILURES OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR CIVILIAN CASUALTIES CAUSED BY INTERNATIONAL MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2014 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2014 Index: ASA 11/006/2014 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Bodies of women who were killed in a September 2012 US airstrike are brought to a hospital in the Alingar district of Laghman province. © ASSOCIATED PRESS/Khalid Khan amnesty.org CONTENTS MAP OF AFGHANISTAN .......................................................................................... 6 1. SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 7 Methodology ..........................................................................................................
  • Supplemental Statement

    Supplemental Statement

    Received by NSD/FARA Registration Unit 10/30/2018 11:22:49 AM OMB No. 1124-0002; Expires May 31,2020 u.s. Department of Justice Supplemental Statement Washington, dc 20530 Pursuant to the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended For Six Month Period Ending 9/30/18...... (Insert date) I - REGISTRANT 1, (a) Name of Registrant (b) Registration No. The Livingston Group, LLC #6344 (c) Business Address(es) of Registrant 499 S. Capitol Street, SW 2. Has there been a change in the information previously furnished in connection with the following? (a) If an individual: (1) Residence address(es) Yes □ No □ (2) Citizenship Yes □ No □ (3) Occupation Yes □ No Q (b) If an organization: (1) Name Yes □ No H (2) Ownership or control Yes □ No 0 (3) Branch offices Yes □ No 0 (c) Explain fully all changes, if any, indicated in Items (a) and (b) above. IF THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL, OMIT RESPONSE TO ITEMS 3,4, AND 5(a). 3. If you have previously filed Exhibit C*1, state whether any changes therein have occurred during this 6 month reporting period. Yes □ No 0 If yes, have you filed an amendment to the Exhibit C? Yes □ No □ If no, please attach the required amendment. 1 'Hie Exhibit C, for which no printed form is provided, consists of a true copy of the charter, articles of incorporation, association, and by laws of a registrant that is an organization. (A waiver of the requirement to file an Exhibit C may be obtained for good cause upon written application to the Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division, U.S.
  • Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent: a New Frontline in the Global Jihadist Movement?” the International Centre for Counter- Ter Rorism – the Hague 8, No

    Al Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent: a New Frontline in the Global Jihadist Movement?” the International Centre for Counter- Ter Rorism – the Hague 8, No

    AL-QAEDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT: The Nucleus of Jihad in South Asia THE SOUFAN CENTER JANUARY 2019 AL-QAEDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT: THE NUCLEUS OF JIHAD IN SOUTH ASIA !1 AL-QAEDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT: THE NUCLEUS OF JIHAD IN SOUTH ASIA AL-QAEDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT (AQIS): The Nucleus of Jihad in South Asia THE SOUFAN CENTER JANUARY 2019 !2 AL-QAEDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT: THE NUCLEUS OF JIHAD IN SOUTH ASIA CONTENTS List of Abbreviations 4 List of Figures & Graphs 5 Key Findings 6 Executive Summary 7 AQIS Formation: An Affiliate with Strong Alliances 11 AQIS Leadership 19 AQIS Funding & Finances 24 Wahhabization of South Asia 27 A Region Primed: Changing Dynamics in the Subcontinent 31 Global Threats Posed by AQIS 40 Conclusion 44 Contributors 46 About The Soufan Center (TSC) 48 Endnotes 49 !3 AL-QAEDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT: THE NUCLEUS OF JIHAD IN SOUTH ASIA LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AAI Ansar ul Islam Bangladesh ABT Ansar ul Bangla Team AFPAK Afghanistan and Pakistan Region AQC Al-Qaeda Central AQI Al-Qaeda in Iraq AQIS Al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent FATA Federally Administered Tribal Areas HUJI Harkat ul Jihad e Islami HUJI-B Harkat ul Jihad e Islami Bangladesh ISI Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence ISKP Islamic State Khorasan Province JMB Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen Bangladesh KFR Kidnap for Randsom LeJ Lashkar e Jhangvi LeT Lashkar e Toiba TTP Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan !4 AL-QAEDA IN THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT: THE NUCLEUS OF JIHAD IN SOUTH ASIA LIST OF FIGURES & GRAPHS Figure 1: Map of South Asia 9 Figure 2:
  • Political Islam: a 40 Year Retrospective

    Political Islam: a 40 Year Retrospective

    religions Article Political Islam: A 40 Year Retrospective Nader Hashemi Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver, Denver, CO 80208, USA; [email protected] Abstract: The year 2020 roughly corresponds with the 40th anniversary of the rise of political Islam on the world stage. This topic has generated controversy about its impact on Muslims societies and international affairs more broadly, including how governments should respond to this socio- political phenomenon. This article has modest aims. It seeks to reflect on the broad theme of political Islam four decades after it first captured global headlines by critically examining two separate but interrelated controversies. The first theme is political Islam’s acquisition of state power. Specifically, how have the various experiments of Islamism in power effected the popularity, prestige, and future trajectory of political Islam? Secondly, the theme of political Islam and violence is examined. In this section, I interrogate the claim that mainstream political Islam acts as a “gateway drug” to radical extremism in the form of Al Qaeda or ISIS. This thesis gained popularity in recent years, yet its validity is open to question and should be subjected to further scrutiny and analysis. I examine these questions in this article. Citation: Hashemi, Nader. 2021. Political Islam: A 40 Year Keywords: political Islam; Islamism; Islamic fundamentalism; Middle East; Islamic world; Retrospective. Religions 12: 130. Muslim Brotherhood https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12020130 Academic Editor: Jocelyne Cesari Received: 26 January 2021 1. Introduction Accepted: 9 February 2021 Published: 19 February 2021 The year 2020 roughly coincides with the 40th anniversary of the rise of political Islam.1 While this trend in Muslim politics has deeper historical and intellectual roots, it Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral was approximately four decades ago that this subject emerged from seeming obscurity to with regard to jurisdictional claims in capture global attention.
  • The Haqqani Network

    The Haqqani Network

    October 2010 Jeffrey A. Dressler AFGHANISTAN REPORT 6 THE HAQQANI NETWORK FROM PAKISTAN TO AFGHANISTAN INSTITUTE FOR THE STUDY of WAR Military A nalysis andEducation for Civilian Leaders Cover photo: Members of an Afghan-international security force pull security on a compound in Waliuddin Bak dis- trict, of Khost province, Afghanistan, Apr. 8, 2010. During the search, the security force captured a Haqqani facilita- tor, responsible for specialized improvised explosive device support and technical expertise for various militant networks. (U.S. Army photo by Spc. Mark Salazar/Released) All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. ©2010 by the Institute for the Study of War. Published in 2010 in the United States of America by the Institute for the Study of War. 1400 16th Street NW, Suite 515, Washington, DC 20036. http://www.understandingwar.org ABOUT THE AUTHOR Jeffrey A. Dressler is a Research Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) where he studies security dynamics in southeastern and southern Afghanistan. He previously published the ISW report, Securing Helmand: Understanding and Responding to the Enemy (October 2009). Dressler’s work has drawn praise from members of the Marine Corps and the intelligence community for its understanding of the enemy network in southern Afghanistan and analysis of the military campaign in Helmand province over the past several years. Dressler was invited to Afghanistan in July 2010 to conduct research for General David Petraeus following his assumption of command.