Gb2attach.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FOREWORD This 2010-20 Consolidated State and Non-State nine years. More detailed project information may rests with the Office of the President. Through this Capital Financial Plan (2010-20 Consolidated be viewed at http://budget.ucop.edu/capital/201020/2010- process, the Regents exercise portfolio oversight Plan) reports the University’s multi-year program of 20ConsolidatedState&Non-StateCapitalFinancialPlan.pdf. of capital projects; the Office of the President proposed capital construction and renovation. Because resources for capital construction are provides due diligence regarding approval Submitted annually for acceptance by the constrained, a more comprehensive planning processes, and legal, financial, or policy risks; and Regents, the 2010-20 Consolidated Plan brings strategy has been developed to ensure prudent the campuses have greater responsibility and together the following required reports: annual investment of capital funds. In 2008, the Regents accountability for the successful delivery of capital Budget for State Capital Improvements; University adopted measures to integrate capital planning projects. of California Five-Year Capital Program State even more thoroughly into related financial Projects of a higher dollar value – or those which Funds; and Annual Report on Campuses’ Ten- planning, campus-wide physical plans, design may pose legal, financial, or policy risks – will Year Capital Financial Plans. Subsequently, the standards, and land use objectives. The horizon continue to be reviewed by the Regents and will 2010-20 Consolidated Plan is being submitted to for capital planning has been extended from five follow designated steps for approval and the State of California in compliance with years to ten. implementation. legislative reporting requirements. Responsibility for the capital program rests with The projects included in this 2010-20 Consolidated This document presents information about the Regents, but the earlier practice of bringing all Plan have been carefully reviewed for suitability of proposed capital projects in a larger context of major projects to the Regents for individual review their scope, cost, and funding plans. They include goals and needs, economic conditions, and has been streamlined in a pilot program for most projects funded with debt financing, campus funds, specific circumstances. It demonstrates the projects with values less than or equal to gifts, auxiliary reserves, federal funds, and State University’s actions to adapt its proposals to $60 million. Regents’ acceptance of a Capital funds. As campuses refine their plans and take anticipated conditions of demography, academic Financial Plan and Physical Design Framework, in advantage of new opportunities, the proposals initiatives, safety-code requirements, financial concert with the campus academic plan and Long included in this report may be updated. resources, and public service to California. It also Range Development Plan (LRDP), provides the These campus Capital Financial Plans, however, provides a perspective for and analysis of the opportunity for Chancellors to approve non-State do not encompass all of the University’s capital University’s capital program, followed by a chapter project budgets and design for these projects. The needs. The broader spectrum of needs to be for each campus presenting the capital projects Office of the President reviews project compliance addressed in future capital programs is included in necessary to achieve its goals. The report with legal requirements and consistency with each campus’s discussion of its goals, priorities, includes projects the University expects to propose approved plans. After review, responsibility for and long-range plan. for State funding between 2011-12 and 2019-20 approval and implementation resides with the and the projects planned to be funded from non- Chancellors as well as follow-up reporting State sources for 2010-11 and the succeeding responsibilities. Review and audit responsibility i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................ i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................... ii I. Perspective.. ........................................................................................................................................ 1 II. State Capital Improvement Program: 2011-12 Budget Request .......................................................... 9 III. 2011-12 Budget for State Capital Improvements Summary Table ....................................................... 10 IV. 2010-20 Consolidated State and Non-State Capital Financial Plan ..................................................... 11 V. Berkeley ............................................................................................................................................... 15 VI. Davis .................................................................................................................................................... 26 VII. Irvine .................................................................................................................................................... 44 VIII. Los Angeles ......................................................................................................................................... 58 IX. Merced ................................................................................................................................................. 71 X. Riverside .............................................................................................................................................. 82 XI. San Diego ............................................................................................................................................ 92 XII. San Francisco ...................................................................................................................................... 109 XIII. Santa Barbara ...................................................................................................................................... 120 XIV. Santa Cruz ........................................................................................................................................... 130 XV. Agriculture and Natural Resources ...................................................................................................... 143 Capital Program At-A-Glance ............................................................................................................................. 148 Key to the Tables ............................................................................................................................................... 157 List of Displays 1. Status of UC Poor and Very Poor Buildings ................................................................................................ 4 2. State-Funded Projects 1998-99 through 2010-11 ....................................................................................... 11 ii 3. Non-State Fund Sources 1998-99 through 2009-10 ................................................................................... 11 4. 2010-20 Fund Sources ............................................................................................................................... 12 5. 2010-20 Primary Project Objectives ............................................................................................................ 12 6. 2010-20 Program Categories ..................................................................................................................... 12 APPENDIX 1. Fund Sources .............................................................................................................................................. 158 iii PERSPECTIVE The University of California (UC) was founded in 1868 . Research programs with an emphasis on cause to be constructed, such buildings as as a public, State-supported land grant institution. teaching research at both the undergraduate and shall be needed for the immediate use of the The State Constitution establishes UC as a public graduate levels. University. trust to be administered under the authority of an . Public service, including outreach and K-14 independent governing board, the Regents of the improvement programs, cooperative agricultural University of California. The University maintains ten extension programs, and health sciences clinical campuses: Berkeley, Davis, Irvine, Los Angeles, care programs. Merced, Riverside, San Diego, San Francisco, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz. Nine of the campuses offer The curriculum outlined in the University’s Charter undergraduate, graduate, and professional education; has also been embodied at dozens of ancillary sites only San Francisco is devoted exclusively to health throughout the State – institutes, research stations, sciences graduate and professional instruction. The cultural centers, ecological preserves, hospitals and University operates teaching hospitals and clinics on clinics, observatories, agricultural extension offices, the Los Angeles and San Francisco campuses and in conference centers, a scholarly press, super- Berkeley: South Hall Sacramento, San Diego, and Orange counties. computing installations, and overseas affiliates. The UC’s first permanent