Workshop Report, Nakuru County-Kenya, August 2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Workshop Report, Nakuru County-Kenya, August 2013 PROGRAM NURU YA BONDE December 2013 • AIDS Population and Health Integrated Assistance UPDATES Community Health Clinical Services Health Communication Monitoring & Evaluation Building Capacity in Analysis and Use of District HIV/AIDS Data: Workshop Report, Nakuru County-Kenya, August 2013 Background The AIDS, Population and Health Integrated Assistance project in Rift Valley, APHIAplus Nuru ya Bonde, is a five-year program (2011-2015)] supported by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). APHIAplus Nuru ya Bonde works to improve health outcomes and impacts through sustainable country-led programs and partnerships. The project works to increase the use of quality services, products and, information and address social determinants of health to improve the wellbeing of communities in five out of the 14 counties in Rift Valley region of Kenya — Baringo, Nakuru, Narok, Laikipia and Kajiado. One of the key mandates of APHIAplus Nuru ya Bonde project is “Dissemination of data to strengthen capacity to record, report and use of data for decision-making at the county, district, in a more systematic facility and community levels. manner will guide and The project works with Civil Society Organizations (CSOs), the District Health Management Teams sharpen the focus of (DHMTs) and other national level partners to strengthen the Health Management Information program implementation, System [HMIS]. To achieve this, the project uses four key approaches that include mentorship, and enhance the utility of making available the standard data collection and reporting tools, enhancing coordination, and data for policy making.” improving data quality and use. In August 2013, APHIAplus Nuru ya Bonde in collaboration with the Nakuru County Health Management Team organized an introductory data analysis and use workshop. The workshop targeted nine District Health Information Officers (DHRIOs) and District HIV/AIDS and STI Coordinators (DASCOs) from each district. HIV activity managers, facility managers and HRIOs from three facilities — Nakuru provincial hospital, Gilgil and Molo district hospitals — also attended. Representatives from the Division of Health management Information System (HMIS), National AIDS and STI Control Programme (NASCOP], the agency that coordinates management of HIV/AIDS programs in Kenya, and DHMTs attended the two-day workshop. APHIAplus Nuru ya Bonde M&E staff, the Head of M&E at NASCOP, County Health Records Officer and a representative of the Division of HMIS facilitated the workshop. Key M&E Strategies Objectives Approach Key strategies to strengthen recording, Specific objectives of this The workshop followed a reporting and data use introductory workshop were to: participatory process, combining • Building the capacity, knowledge • Build capacity of county and intense practical exercises, and skills of Monitoring and district health staff in data presentations of best practices Evaluation Officers to provide analysis, presentation, use and and frameworks for routine data technical assistance; interpretation. analysis. Case studies derived • Ensuring standard reporting tools are • Contribute to standardizing the from actual HIV prevention, available at data collection points; types of analysis county and care and treatment data for July • Building the capacity of health care district teams can do with their 2012 to June 2013 period from workers and community volunteers routine data. the District Health Information to use the tools; • Generate hypotheses for further Systems [DHIS] formed the basis • Creating demand for use of data for investigation, which may feed into for discussions. decision making and improving data the county data analysis plan. quality. 1 Workshop Opening Remarks and Presentations The workshop was officially opened by and missed opportunities for service HIV data illustrated general frameworks Dr. Benedict Osore, the County Director provision. for monitoring HIV/AIDS programs of Medical Services. In his remarks, he Finally, the County Director of Medical including the cascade analytical acknowledged the national level for Services reiterated the need for framework and how this can be used building M&E capacity at county level. conducting quarterly information sharing to identify opportunities for service He reported that from the analysis of key and review forums at facility, districts improvement. health indicators in 2008, it was difficult and departmental level. The participants appreciated the cascade then to establish magnitude of events. An overview of APHIAPlus Nuru Ya Bonde framework and its utility in determining He cited the extent of sexual and gender project was presented followed by a if HIV/AIDS interventions were working. based violence during the post-election presentation on DHIS2 system updates [Fig. 1.] violence in 2008 from the available data including how to navigate, view and verify from Nakuru PGH. Recent analysis have Fig. 1. PMTCT Cascade framework data. The presentation covered pivot tables, presentation indicated an improvement, however, data visualizer, graphs and GIS. there was still need for better results. Dr. Osore also noted that that so far all The participants hospitals had embraced technology for appreciated the data management and should therefore different ways use the information available to improve in which data is efficiency in service delivery. presented in DHIS2 and particularly the He emphasized the need to go beyond fact that they could reporting requirements to focus on identify sites and data analysis and sharing, which is outliers in the data. key in promoting best practices to address health challenges. In addition, The final he recommended the allocation of presentation on resources for operation research different ways of targeting coverage, uptake of services presenting routine Group Work Participants were divided into four groups each with case studies and a copy of the County Data Analysis Workbook containing data extracted from DHIS [Fig. 2.] They were tasked to work on two case studies using the routine data for Nakuru County for the period July 2012 and June 2013. The data was from 375 health facilities in nine districts. The objective of the exercises was to identify how well the different interventions were working e.g. HIV testing and counseling by analyzing Nakuru county HIV/AIDS routine data. Below are two case studies that formed part of the group work: Case Study 1 Group Assignment Each of the four groups was asked to use data for 12 months from July 2012 to June 2013 of HIV testing and counseling [HTC] data to chart the overall trend in HTC Nakuru County by testing points, quarter, age and sex and respond to the following questions: • What proportion of HIV positive tests are from DTC, VCT etc. How does this compare with 2009 national data of DTC 39%, VCT 32%, PMTCT 17% and TB 11%? • What changes have been seen from the last 6 months in 2012 compared to the first 6 months of 2013? 2 Findings for Case Study 1 Key findings as indicated in Fig. 3 and 4 below were as follows: Fig. 3. HTC quarterly • There was a steady increase in HTC uptake among performance by male and female children from the Jul-Sep 12’ to the age and sex group Apr-Jun 13’ quarter and a decline in testing among presentation males and females aged above 15 years from the Oct- Dec 12’ to the Apr-Jun 13’ quarter [Fig. 3]. • Uptake for both female adults and children was higher compared to males [Fig. 3] . • Findings indicate the need to formulate strategies to deliberately target males both below and above 15 years with HTC to increase uptake among this group in the county. Fig. 4. • While the national level had DTC with the highest HTC Nakuru County verses National proportion of HIV positive tests at 39%, VCT had the performance group highest at county level at 34% [Fig. 4.] . presentation • TB HIV positives tests were the least among all tests at both national [11%] and county level [15%] even though the county level rates were slightly higher [Fig. 4.] . Workshop participants in a group exercise. data for data elements used. Case Study 2 Group Findings for Case • Further, there is need to strengthen the Assignment Study 2 enrollment of HIV positive PMTCT clients into Participants were asked to design a • The coverage of ANC services in Nakuru care and coverage of ANC services in Nakuru ‘cascade’ analysis graph for PMTCT county is 53% County. which looks at the progression of • Of those pregnant women who attended Fig. 5. PMTCT Cascade group presentation clients through the different stages ANC, 88% were reached with HIV testing of service, from initial HIV tests services to treatment and outcomes. They • Only 62% of HIV-positive pregnant answered the following questions: women identified through PMTCT were • Which component appear to be enrolled into care in Nakuru county functioning best, and why? • Provision of maternal prophylaxis is • What improvements have been seen working well in Nakuru county, 90% of in the component over the last year? pregnant women who were eligible for • Where are the opportunities for prophylaxis received it. improvement? • The results showing 115% infant • What information is missing and prophylaxis provided indicates the need what are the data quality issues? for the reexamination of the quality of 3 Recommendations • Facilitate analysis and use of data from routine health information systems and community health information system (CHIS)]at facility level and in community health units. • Ensure results from M&E are used to improve project implementation. (M&E results be presented in ways that facilitate decision-making at the facility, district, county and project level) • Work with national HIV/AIDS program agencies to identify M&E gaps and share District Health Records Officer for Subukia District Judy Machani Presents on behalf of her group. reporting rates. • Give more time to group work and presentations to allow discussions of the What participants said findings. • “It [workshop] enlightened me on importance of correct data collection for higher • Organize a field visit to one of the districts level decision-making.” that is performing well in data analysis.
Recommended publications
  • Nakuru County
    Kenya County Climate Risk Profile Nakuru County Map Book Contents Agro-Ecological Zones Baseline Map ………………….…………………………………………………………... 1 Baseline Map ………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………... 2 Elevation Map ...…………………….……………………………………………………………………………………..... 3 Farming Systems Map ……………….…….…………………………………………………………………………...... 4 Land Cover Map …………...……………………………………………………………………………………………...... 5 Livestock Production Systems Map ..…………………………………………………………………………......... 6 Mean Precipitation Map ……………….……………………………………………………………………………....... 7 Mean Temperature Map ……………………………………………………………………………………………....... 8 Population Density Map .………………………………………………………………………….…………………...... 9 Satellite Map .……………………………………………………………..………………………………………………... 10 Soil Classes Map ..……………………………………………………………………………………………..………...... 11 Travel Time Map ……………….…………………………………………………………………………………..…...... 12 AGRO-ECOLOGICAL ZONES a i o p ! ! i ! g ! ! ! k ! n i ! i ! ! ! ! r ! ! ! a ! ! a L ! ! !! ! ! ! ! B ! ! Solai ! ! ! ! Subukia ! ! ! ! ! ! Athinai ! ! ! ! Moto ! ! Bahati ! ! Rongai Kabarak N ! ! ! Menengai ! ! ! ! y Molo ! ! Dondori ! Turi ! a ! Nakuru ! ! ! Keusa Lanet Kio ! Elburgon ! ! ! Sasamua ! ! Chesingele Njoro n ! ! ! d N a k u r u ! ! ! ! Keringet ! a Kiriri ! Kariandusi ! Mukuki ! ! Elmentaita r Kabsege ! Gilgil ! ! Likia ! u East Mau ! ! ! a Olenguruone Mau ! ! F Cheptwech ! Narok ! ! ! Ambusket ! ! ! Morendat ! ! ! ! Naivasha ! ! Marangishu ! ! ! ! Ngunyumu Kangoni ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Longonot ! ! ! u ! ! ! b Akira Mai ! ! ! Legend ! Mahiu N a r o k ! m ! Town ! Agro-ecological
    [Show full text]
  • National Energy Situational and Stakeholder Analysis KENYA
    National Energy Situational and Stakeholder Analysis KENYA 100% Renewables Cities and Regions Roadmap Supported by: based on a decision of the German Bundestag National Energy Situational and Stakeholder Analysis: Kenya The material in this publication is copyrighted. Content from this discussion paper may be used for non-commercial purposes, provided it is attributed to the source. ICLEI Africa - Local Government for Sustainability Cape Town, South Africa December 2020 Authors: Dania Petrik, ICLEI Africa Godfrey Maina, consultant Modest Muriuki, consultant Justus Munyoki, SUSTwatch Reviewers (in Alphabetical Order): Mr. N. Bukachi, EPRA Ms. C. Buma, ICLEI Africa Mr. D. Hoepfl, ICLEI World Secretariat Ms. P. Kimotho, REREC Mr. B.K. Kinyanjui, Kenya Power Ms. N. Majoe, ICLEI Africa Mr. J. Munyoki, SUSTwatch Ms. K. Muoki, State Department for Planning Mr. J. Muthomi, consultant Mr. K. Olwasi, Ministry of Environment and Forestry Mr. E. Omwenga, Ministry of Energy Mr. R. Sen, ICLEI World Secretariat i Acknowledgement This report was produced as part of the project 100% of Renewables Cities and Regions Roadmap, (or 100%RE), implemented by ICLEI and funded by the International Climate Initiative (IKI) of the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) of Germany. The contributions of various institutions involved in the consultations for the Kenya National Energy Situational Report are greatly appreciated. We would like to thank all the experts and government officials involved in the feedback process for their insights – without which the value of this project would be much reduced. The authors would especially like to thank our representatives from the 100% RE National Project Advisory Group (NPAG), who have so generously committed time and energy to contribute towards the outputs of the 100% RE project.
    [Show full text]
  • THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered As a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) Vol
    1.\'‘ • „ , 4 y()tcl , ••• .1)04 I THE KENYA GAZETTE Published by Authority of the Republic of Kenya (Registered as a Newspaper at the G.P.O.) Vol. CXXI —No. 39 NAIROBI, 5th April, 2019 Price Sh. 60 CONTENTS GAZETTE NOTICES PAGE PAGE The Auctioneers Act—Appointments 1220 The Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act—The 4th Taskforce of Sugar Industry Stakeholders to Make Quarterly Report Covering the Period from 1st Recommendations for the Development of the October, 2018 to 31st December, 2018 1274-1281 Sugar Industry in Kenya—Extension of Term 1220 The Crops Act—Proposed Grant of Licences 1281 Taskforce of Maize Industry Stakeholders to Make Recommendations for the Development of the The Competition Act—Authorizations 1282 Maize Industry in Kenya—Extension of Term 1220 The Political Parties Act—Change of Political Party County Governments Notices 1220 1221,1282 Symbol 1284 The Land Registration Act—Issue of Provisional The Co-operative Societies Act—Extension Order 1284 Certificates, etc 1221-1231 The Physical Planning Act—Completion of Part The Public Finance Management Act—County Development Plans 1285-1286 Governments Cash Disbursement Schedule for Financial Year 2018/2019 1231-1235 The Environmental Management and Co-ordination Act— Environmental Impact Assessment Study Report The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission 1286-1287 Act—Corrigenda, etc 1235-1236 The Transfer of Business Act—Business Transfers 1287-1288 The Valuers Act—Registered and Practising Valuers 1236-1242 Disposal of Uncollected Goods 1288 The Engineers Act—Registered Professional Engineers 1242-1273 Loss of Policies 1288-1296 The Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act— Notice of Preservation Orders 1273-1274 Change of Names 1296 [1219 1220 THE KENYA GAZETTE 5th April, 2019 CORRIGENDA GAZETTE NOTICE No.
    [Show full text]
  • County Name County Code Location
    COUNTY NAME COUNTY CODE LOCATION MOMBASA COUNTY 001 BANDARI COLLEGE KWALE COUNTY 002 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT MATUGA KILIFI COUNTY 003 PWANI UNIVERSITY TANA RIVER COUNTY 004 MAU MAU MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL LAMU COUNTY 005 LAMU FORT HALL TAITA TAVETA 006 TAITA ACADEMY GARISSA COUNTY 007 KENYA NATIONAL LIBRARY WAJIR COUNTY 008 RED CROSS HALL MANDERA COUNTY 009 MANDERA ARIDLANDS MARSABIT COUNTY 010 ST. STEPHENS TRAINING CENTRE ISIOLO COUNTY 011 CATHOLIC MISSION HALL, ISIOLO MERU COUNTY 012 MERU SCHOOL THARAKA-NITHI 013 CHIAKARIGA GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL EMBU COUNTY 014 KANGARU GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KITUI COUNTY 015 MULTIPURPOSE HALL KITUI MACHAKOS COUNTY 016 MACHAKOS TEACHERS TRAINING COLLEGE MAKUENI COUNTY 017 WOTE TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE NYANDARUA COUNTY 018 ACK CHURCH HALL, OL KALAU TOWN NYERI COUNTY 019 NYERI PRIMARY SCHOOL KIRINYAGA COUNTY 020 ST.MICHAEL GIRLS BOARDING MURANGA COUNTY 021 MURANG'A UNIVERSITY COLLEGE KIAMBU COUNTY 022 KIAMBU INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY TURKANA COUNTY 023 LODWAR YOUTH POLYTECHNIC WEST POKOT COUNTY 024 MTELO HALL KAPENGURIA SAMBURU COUNTY 025 ALLAMANO HALL PASTORAL CENTRE, MARALAL TRANSZOIA COUNTY 026 KITALE MUSEUM UASIN GISHU 027 ELDORET POLYTECHNIC ELGEYO MARAKWET 028 IEBC CONSTITUENCY OFFICE - ITEN NANDI COUNTY 029 KAPSABET BOYS HIGH SCHOOL BARINGO COUNTY 030 KENYA SCHOOL OF GOVERNMENT, KABARNET LAIKIPIA COUNTY 031 NANYUKI HIGH SCHOOL NAKURU COUNTY 032 NAKURU HIGH SCHOOL NAROK COUNTY 033 MAASAI MARA UNIVERSITY KAJIADO COUNTY 034 MASAI TECHNICAL TRAINING INSTITUTE KERICHO COUNTY 035 KERICHO TEA SEC. SCHOOL
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment and Recommendations to Increase Access to Oxygen and Pulse Oximetry in Kenya
    MARCH 2018 Assessment and recommendations to increase access to oxygen and pulse oximetry in Kenya MAILING ADDRESS PO Box 900922 Seattle, WA 98109 USA ADDRESS 2201 Westlake Avenue Suite 200 Seattle, WA 98121 USA TEL: 206.285.3500 FAX: 206.285.6619 www.path.org This report was written by PATH and supported by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The views expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Gates Foundation. Suggested citation: PATH. Assessment and recommendations to increase access to oxygen and pulse oximetry in Kenya. Seattle: PATH; 2018. Contact information: Lisa Smith, Market Dynamics Officer, PATH Email: [email protected] Contents Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Executive summary ....................................................................................................................................... 5 Background information ............................................................................................................................... 7 Project background .................................................................................................................................. 7 Kenya project work .................................................................................................................................. 7 Current status of safe oxygen delivery ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kenya: Agricultural Sector
    Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER Public Disclosure Authorized KENYA AGRICULTURAL SECTOR RISK ASSESSMENT Public Disclosure Authorized Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin WORLD BANK GROUP REPORT NUMBER 97887 NOVEMBER 2015 Public Disclosure Authorized AGRICULTURE GLOBAL PRACTICE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PAPER KENYA Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment Stephen P. D’Alessandro, Jorge Caballero, John Lichte, and Simon Simpkin Kenya: Agricultural Sector Risk Assessment © 2015 World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org E-mail: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The fi ndings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clear- ance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone: 978-750-8400, fax: 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright .com/.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Food Systems Through Diversification and Indigenous Vegetables an ANALYSIS of the SOUTHERN NAKURU COUNTY
    Making policies work SASS Sustainable food systems through diversification and indigenous vegetables AN ANALYSIS OF THE SOUTHERN NAKURU COUNTY REPORT I By Francesco Rampa and Hanne Knaepen July 2019 Sustainable food systems through diversification and indigenous vegetables: An analysis of southern Nakuru County SASS Report I by Francesco Rampa and Hanne Knaepen July 2019 SASS report I www.ecdpm.org/sass_i ii SASS report I www.ecdpm.org/sass_i Acknowledgements We are pleased to acknowledge our key partner, who provides the bulk of the funding for the “Sustainable Agrifood Systems Strategies (SASS)” programme: the Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research (MIUR). The conceptualisation of this report was led by Francesco Rampa and Hanne Knaepen (European Centre for Development Policy Management, ECDPM), based on the indispensable input from various subject-matter experts, who are members of the SASS consortium, including from the University of Milano-Bicocca (UNIMIB), the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (UNICATT), the University of Pavia (UNIPV) and the University of Gastronomic Sciences (UNISG). Within the framework of the SASS programme, these academic experts have published a number of academic papers that are referenced in this report (and more will be published in the near future). We would also like to thank the Naivasha Basin Sustainability Initiative (NBSI), in particular Nic Pacini, for their strong multi-tasking support on the ground and the provision of valuable feedback on this report, as well as the Feltrinelli Foundation. We also thank all stakeholders in the southern Nakuru region and in Nairobi, who provided valuable contributions to SASS through surveys, interviews, their participation in workshops, and other types of support, during the period 2017-2019.
    [Show full text]
  • USAID KENYA HIV Service Delivery Support Activity (HSDSA)
    USAID KENYA HIV Service Delivery Support Activity (HSDSA) Cluster2 Quarterly Progress Report April to June 2018 A health care worker facilitates a support group meeting in Turkana County Date of Submission: July 30, 2018 This publication was by prepared by FHI 360 for review by United States Agency for International Development USAID KENYA (HIV Service Delivery Support Activity Cluster 2) FY 2018 Q2 Progress Report 01 April – 30 June 2018 Contract No: 72061518C00002 Prepared for Dr. James Batuka United States Agency for International Development/Kenya C/O American Embassy United Nations Avenue, Gigiri P.O. Box 629, Village Market 00621 Nairobi, Kenya Prepared by: Family Health International (FHI 360) The Chancery, 2nd Floor P.O Box 38835-00623, Valley Road Nairobi, Kenya The authors’ views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ii | HSDSA Cluster 2 Q3 (Apr-Jun 2018) Progress Report TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................... IV I. HSDSA CLUSTER 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... VII II. KEY ACHIEVEMENTS (QUALITATIVE IMPACT) .................................................................................... 13 OBJECTIVE 1: INCREASED AVAILABILITY AND USE OF COMBINATION PREVENTION SERVICES FOR PRIORITY POPULATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Nakuru Countywide Strategic Sanitation Plan
    Nakuru Countywide Strategic Sanitation Plan Countywide Inclusive Sanitation Strategy March 2019 Foreword Nakuru County is one of the counties in Kenya with fast growing populations, urban centres and robust economies. This growth continues to exert pressure on our already overstretched social infrastructure and services such as water, housing, sanitation and healthcare. It is worth noting that only 29.7 percent and 21 percent of the urban and rural populations respectively use improved sanitation facilities, with sewerage coverage estimated at a measly 3.4 percent. A significant proportion of the population in Nakuru County estimated at about 1.8 percent still defecates in the open. This situation is exacerbated by inadequate water supply, limited solid waste management and drai- nage management systems especially in the low income, informal and unplanned urban settlements. The conse- quence of these shocking statistics is reflected in the poor health status of our people and our degraded environment. Unfortunately water and sanitation related diseases such as diarrhea and cholera continue to pose a great challenge to the county. It is estimated that Nakuru county loses about KES 978 million per year due to poor sanitation. The County Government of Nakuru is taking these challenges very seriously. With the support of the National Government, through the Ministries of Water & Sanitation, Health, the World Bank and other stakeholders, we have embarked on an elaborate process of developing a comprehensive Countywide Inclusive Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan to address these sanitation challenges in the county. The overall objective of the Nakuru Countywide Inclusive Sanitation Strategy and Investment Plan is to provide direction for the county to achieve its vision of providing universal access to safe and sutainable sanitation to the entire county population by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • 44. Uasin Gishu
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized PROJECTS INCOUNTIES WORLD BANK-FUNDED KENYA WORLD BANK-FUNDED PROJECTS IN COUNTIES KENYA March, 2016 DATA SOURCE: 1. Kenya County Fact Sheets: Populaton & Populaton density - Kenya Natonal Bureau of Statstcs 2009 Census. Poverty gap Index Source: Kenya Natonal Bureau of statstcs (2012) County Poverty Trends based on WMS II (1994), WMS III. (1997bs (2005/06) and KIHBS. 2. Exchange rate US$-KSH 103 Central Bank of Kenya average July-September 2015. Disclaimer: The informaton contained in this booklet, is likely to be altered, based on changes that occur during project preparaton and implementaton. The booklet contains informaton on all actve projects in the country as of June 2015. It also captures actve regional projects that impact on various countes in Kenya. The booklet takes into account the difculty of allocatng defned amounts to countes in projects that have a natonal approach and impact. It has applied pro rata amounts as defned in each secton. However, it has not captured informaton under the following projects: EAPP-P112688, KEMP-P120014 & P145104, KEEPP103037, ESRP P083131 & P129910, EEHP -P126579, EATTFT-P079734 & NCTIPP082615, WKCDD & FMP P074106, AAIOSK-P132161, EARTTD-P148853, and KGPED-P14679. Design: Robert Waiharo Photo Credits: Isabela Gómez & Gitonga M’mbijiwe TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Figure1: the Map of Kenya Showing 47 Counties (Colored) and 295 Sub-Counties (Numbered)
    BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Global Health Additional file 1: The county and sub counties of Kenya Figure1: The map of Kenya showing 47 counties (colored) and 295 sub-counties (numbered). The extents of major lakes and the Indian Ocean are shown in light blue. The names of the counties and sub- counties corresponding to the shown numbers below the maps. List of Counties (bold) and their respective sub county (numbered) as presented in Figure 1 1. Baringo county: Baringo Central [1], Baringo North [2], Baringo South [3], Eldama Ravine [4], Mogotio [5], Tiaty [6] 2. Bomet county: Bomet Central [7], Bomet East [8], Chepalungu [9], Konoin [10], Sotik [11] 3. Bungoma county: Bumula [12], Kabuchai [13], Kanduyi [14], Kimilili [15], Mt Elgon [16], Sirisia [17], Tongaren [18], Webuye East [19], Webuye West [20] 4. Busia county: Budalangi [21], Butula [22], Funyula [23], Matayos [24], Nambale [25], Teso North [26], Teso South [27] 5. Elgeyo Marakwet county: Keiyo North [28], Keiyo South [29], Marakwet East [30], Marakwet West [31] 6. Embu county: Manyatta [32], Mbeere North [33], Mbeere South [34], Runyenjes [35] Macharia PM, et al. BMJ Global Health 2020; 5:e003014. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003014 BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance Supplemental material placed on this supplemental material which has been supplied by the author(s) BMJ Global Health 7. Garissa: Balambala [36], Dadaab [37], Dujis [38], Fafi [39], Ijara [40], Lagdera [41] 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Violence in Nakuru County, Kenya
    DIGNITY Publication Series on Torture and Organised Violence # Study 16 URBAN VIOLENCE IN NAKURU COUNTY, KENYA Kamau Wairuri Ahlam Chemlali Mutuma Ruteree 2 | INTERSECTORAL URBAN VIOLENCE PREVENTION URBAN VIOLENCE IN NAKURU COUNTY, KENYA | 3 2 | INTERSECTORAL URBAN VIOLENCE PREVENTION URBAN VIOLENCE IN NAKURU COUNTY, KENYA | 3 URBAN VIOLENCE IN NAKURU COUNTY, KENYAA Study on urban violence prepared by CHRIPS - The Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies (CHRIPS) DIGNITY Publication Series on Torture and Organised Violence No. 16 © 2018 DIGNITY - Danish Institute Against Torture Midrift Human Rights Network https://midrifthurinet.org/ CHRIPS - The Centre for Human Rights and Policy Studies https://www.chrips.or.ke/ Danida http://um.dk/da/danida/ DIGNITY – Danish Institute Against Torture www.dignityinstitute.org ISBN Print: 978-87-90878-87-0 ISBN Online: 978-87-90878-88-7 4 | INTERSECTORAL URBAN VIOLENCE PREVENTION URBAN VIOLENCE IN NAKURU COUNTY, KENYA | 5 Contents 1. Executive Summary 9 2. Introduction 14 2.1 Causal Factors 16 2.2 Forms of Violence 18 2.3 Vulnerability and Victimization 22 2.4 Mitigation 23 2.5 Clarification of Concepts 24 Methodology 26 2.6 Overview 26 2.7 Study Sites 26 2.8 Quantitative (Household) Survey 26 2.9 Qualitative Data 29 2.10 Limitations and Mitigation Measures: 30 2.11 Study Population Characteristics 31 Key Findings and Analysis 32 2.12 Overview 32 2.13 Background of Nakuru County and the five study sites 32 2.14 Experience with violence and perpetrators 35 2.15 Factors that increase the probability
    [Show full text]