WT/DS58/RW ORGANIZATION 15 June 2001 (01-2854)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WT/DS58/RW ORGANIZATION 15 June 2001 (01-2854) WORLD TRADE WT/DS58/RW ORGANIZATION 15 June 2001 (01-2854) Original: English UNITED STATES – IMPORT PROHIBITION OF CERTAIN SHRIMP AND SHRIMP PRODUCTS Recourse to Article 21.5 by Malaysia Report of the Panel The report of the Panel on United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products – Recourse to Article 21.5 by Malaysia – is being circulated to all Members, pursuant to the DSU. The report is being circulated as an unrestricted document from 15 June 2001 pursuant to the Procedures for the Circulation and Derestriction of WTO Documents (WT/L/160/Rev.1). Members are reminded that in accordance with the DSU only parties to the dispute may appeal a panel report. An appeal shall be limited to issues of law covered in the Panel Report and legal interpretations developed by the Panel. There shall be no ex parte communications with the Panel or Appellate Body concerning matters under consideration by the Panel or Appellate Body. WT/DS58/RW Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1 A. TERMS OF REFERENCE.................................................................................................................1 B. PANEL COMPOSITION ..................................................................................................................2 II. FACTUAL ASPECTS ...................................................................................................................2 A. CONSERVATION ISSUES...............................................................................................................2 B. HISTORY OF THE CASE ................................................................................................................3 1. Section 609: the 1996 Guidelines .......................................................................................3 2. Panel proceedings ................................................................................................................5 C. REASONABLE PERIOD OF TIME ....................................................................................................6 D. IMPLEMENTATION .......................................................................................................................6 1. Section 609: the 1999 Revised Guidelines.........................................................................7 III. MAIN ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES .................................................................................9 A. PROCEDURAL ISSUES...................................................................................................................9 1. Terms of reference...............................................................................................................9 2. Submissions from non-governmental organizations.......................................................10 3. Burden of proof..................................................................................................................12 B. VIOLATION OF ARTICLE XI.......................................................................................................14 C. JUSTIFICATION UNDER ARTICLE XX.........................................................................................15 1. General comments .............................................................................................................15 2. Article XX(g) ......................................................................................................................16 3. Chapeau..............................................................................................................................17 (a) General compliance issues ...........................................................................................17 (b) Unjustifiable discrimination.........................................................................................20 (i) Cumulative assessment of the aspects found to constitute unjustifiable discrimination.......................................................................................................20 (ii) Efforts to negotiate and whether a WTO Member is obliged to seek or obtain international consensus.............................................................................20 (a) Efforts to negotiate ..........................................................................................20 (b) Whether a WTO Member is obliged to seek or obtain international consensus before resorting to the measure at issue ........................................26 (iii) Other aspects........................................................................................................31 (a) Consideration of the situation of exporting countries in the Revised Guidelines........................................................................................................31 (b) The ruling of the United States Court of International Trade.........................37 (c) Technical assistance........................................................................................39 (d) Phase-in period ...............................................................................................41 (c) Arbitrary discrimination...............................................................................................41 (a) Lack of flexibility.............................................................................................41 (b) Due process .....................................................................................................43 (d) Disguised restriction on international trade..................................................................45 WT/DS58/RW Page ii IV. SUMMARY OF THIRD PARTY SUBMISSIONS...................................................................46 1. Australia .............................................................................................................................46 2. Ecuador...............................................................................................................................50 3. European Communities.....................................................................................................51 4. Hong Kong, China .............................................................................................................55 5. India ....................................................................................................................................56 6. Japan...................................................................................................................................56 7. Mexico.................................................................................................................................57 8. Thailand..............................................................................................................................61 V. FINDINGS....................................................................................................................................65 A. GENERAL APPROACH TO THE ISSUES BEFORE THE PANEL........................................................65 B. PRELIMINARY ISSUES ................................................................................................................66 1. Terms of reference of the Panel........................................................................................66 2. Date on which the Panel should assess the facts .............................................................68 3. Admissibility of submissions from non-governmental organizations ...........................68 4. Burden of proof..................................................................................................................69 C. VIOLATION OF ARTICLE XI:1 OF THE GATT 1994...................................................................70 D. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE XX OF THE GATT 1994 .................................................................70 1. Preliminary remarks .........................................................................................................70 2. Consistency of the implementing measure with paragraph (g) of Article XX of the GATT 1994...................................................................................................................72 3. Arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination between countries where the same conditions prevail: the question of international negotiations.......................................74 (a) Extent of the US obligation to negotiate and/or reach an international agreement on the protection and conservation of sea turtles .........................................................74 (i) Abuse or misuse of rights under Article XX as a standard for determining the extent of an obligation to negotiate and/or enter into an international agreement .............................................................................................................74 (ii) Obligation to negotiate v. obligation to reach an international agreement.........79 (iii) The Inter-American Convention as a benchmark of serious good faith efforts in this case.................................................................................................81 (iv) Conclusion............................................................................................................83 (b) Assessment of the consistency of the implementing measure......................................84
Recommended publications
  • Establishment and Implementation of a Conservation and Management Regime for High Seas Fisheries, with Focus on the Southeast Pacific and Chile
    ESTABLISHMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT REGIME FOR HIGH SEAS FISHERIES, WITH FOCUS ON THE SOUTHEAST PACIFIC AND CHILE From Global Developments to Regional Challenges M. Cecilia Engler UN - Nippon Foundation Fellow 2006-2007 ii DISCLAIMER The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Government of Chile, the United Nations, the Nippon Foundation of Japan or Dalhousie University. iii iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express my profound gratitude to the Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea (DOALOS), Office of Legal Affairs, United Nations, and the Nippon Foundation of Japan for making this extraordinary and rewarding experience possible. I want to extend my deepest gratitude to the Marine and Environmental Law Institute of Dalhousie University, Canada, and the Sir James Dunn Law Library at the same University Law School, for the assistance, support and warm hospitality provided in the first six months of my fellowship. My special gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Aldo Chircop, for all his guidance and especially for encouraging me to broaden my perspective in order to understand the complexity of the area of research. I would also like to extend my appreciation to those persons who, with no interest but that of helping me through this process, provided me with new insights and perspectives: Jay Batongbacal (JSD Candidate, Dalhousie Law School, Dalhousie University), Johanne Fischer (Executive Secretary of NAFO), Robert Fournier (Marine Affairs Programme, Dalhousie University), Michael Shewchuck (DOALOS), André Tahindro (DOALOS), and David VanderZwaag (Dalhousie Law School, Dalhousie University).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Electricity-Related GHG Emissions and The
    Measuring electricity-related GHG emissions and the affordability of electricity in Malaysian low-cost housing: A case study of low-cost housing projects in Kuala Lumpur Noor Suzaini Mohamed Zaid A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Planning and Urban Development Faculty of Built Environment November 2013 THE UNiVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/.Oissertation Sheet Surname or F!!mlly name: Mohamed Zaid First name: Noor Suz.alnl Other name/s: Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School: Planning and Urban Development Research Faculty: Faculty of Built Environment Title: Measuring electricity-related GHG emissions and the affordability of electricity in Malaysian low-cost housing: A case study of low-cost housing projects in Kuala Lumpur Abstract 350 words maximum: Malaysia Is yet to establish any mandatory energy efficiency or. energy performance building code. In the absence of such legislation, the Malaysian residential sector is likely loclling-in inefficiency for decades Into the future. This research focuses on the public low-cost housing typology (PPR), as the least environmentally researched typology, and has high potential for policy improvements as it is nationally administrated and is a required provision for all new housing developments. A project-specific baseline was developed for the first time in Malaysia using the the UNEP.SCI's Common Carbon Metric (CCM). The CCM tool provides an Internationally comparable baseline that Is consistent with the measurable, reportable and verifiable (MRV) framework for GHG emisssions reporting,. therefore was adopted for this research. A case study was conducted to Investigate energy performance and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from building operation of two PPR in Kuala Lumpur.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan of Action to Implement the Joint Declaration on ASEAN-Canada Enhanced Partnership (2016-2020)
    Adopted Plan of Action to Implement the Joint Declaration on ASEAN-Canada Enhanced Partnership (2016-2020) This Plan of Action implements the Joint Declaration on ASEAN-Canada Enhanced Partnership, adopted by the Foreign Ministers of ASEAN and Canada at the ASEAN Post Ministerial Conference (PMC+1) with Canada on 22 July 2009 in Phuket, Thailand. It will continue to pursue the goals set forth in the Joint Declaration for the second five-year period (2016-2020), building upon the encouraging achievements made in the implementation of the previous Plan of Action (2010-2015). This Plan of Action lays out priorities and measures to be undertaken by both sides to further deepen and enhance their political-security, economic and socio-cultural ties as well as to realise the full potential of the ASEAN-Canada partnership in all areas of common interests. Through the implementation of this Plan of Action, ASEAN and Canada will also work towards supporting the ASEAN Community building and integration process, including the ASEAN Community’s post-2015 Vision, for a politically cohesive, economically integrated, socially responsible and a truly people-oriented, people-centered and rules-based ASEAN, and narrowing the development gap. Both sides will also further promote cooperation in addressing common and emerging challenges and enhance coordination in other international fora on issues of common concern to contribute to peace, stability and prosperity of their respective regions. 1. Political and Security Cooperation 1.1. Political Cooperation 1.1.1. Enhance cooperation to support ASEAN’s efforts in peace and reconciliation in the region through relevant mechanisms, including the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (AIPR); 1.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Malaysia's Response to Climate Change
    MALAYSIAMALAYSIA’’SS RESPONSERESPONSE TOTO CLIMATECLIMATE CHANGECHANGE By Yap Kok Seng Malaysian Meteorological Service PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION OUTLINEOUTLINE zEngagement with the International Community zMalaysia’s Negotiating Position zPolicies and Development Plans zInstitutional Framework for UNFCCC zInstitutional framework for CDM zClimate Change Assessments zResearch and Observations zCapacity Building and Public Awareness Engagement with the International Community UNFCCC Signed: 9 June 1993 Ratified: 13 July 1994 Kyoto Protocol Signed: 12 March 1999 Ratified: 4 September 2002 continue Engagement with the International Community • SIGNATORY TO MANY RELATED MEAs Vienna Convention for the protection of the ozone layer Montreal Protocol Langkawi Declaration among Commonwealth countries, 1989 ASEAN Transboundary Haze Agreement (10 June 2002) Malaysia’s Negotiating Position • Agrees and supports fully the principles of the convention • Climate change for sustainable development • Priority towards eradication of poverty, upgrading of living standard, food security • Common but differentiated responsibilities including taking into account historical emissions • Developed countries are responsible for the state of climate today due to their excessive consumption of fossil fuels since Industrial Revolution • Developed countries must take the lead in reducing the GHGs • Developed countries must take domestic action to reduce GHGs continue Malaysia’s Negotiating Position • Forestry is not to be used as sinks to help them to clean up the atmosphere
    [Show full text]
  • Gfsrclimatechangeactionplan
    ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA 07/75 24 November 2007 AUSTRALIA THE BAHAMAS BANGLADESH BARBADOS BELIZE Lake Victoria BOTSWANA BRUNEI DARUSSALAM Commonwealth Climate Change Action Plan CAMEROON CANADA CYPRUS We, the Heads of Government of the Commonwealth, are gravely concerned about DOMINICA FIJI ISLANDS* the threat that climate change represents to human security and economic wellbeing. THE GAMBIA GHANA 2 We reaffirm our continued commitment to the 1989 Langkawi Declaration on GRENADA GUYANA the Environment when Commonwealth Heads of Government first defined our INDIA collective concern, concluding that: JAMAICA KENYA KIRIBATI • Serious deterioration of the environment is a threat to the well-being of LESOTHO current and future generations; MALAWI • Delay in halting environmental degradation will result in permanent and MALAYSIA MALDIVES irreversible damage; MALTA • Threats to the environment need to be viewed and addressed in a balanced MAURITIUS perspective, mindful of the needs to eradicate poverty, provide sustainable MOZAMBIQUE NAMIBIA development, and enhanced quality of life for all; NAURU** • Most environmental problems transcend national boundaries, and NEW ZEALAND NIGERIA therefore require solutions that are mutually reinforcing at global, regional, PAKISTAN national and community levels; and, PAPUA NEW GUINEA • Solutions to today’s environmental challenges also require active ST KITTS AND NEVIS ST LUCIA participation by all. ST VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES SAMOA 3 We are conscious that climate change is a direct threat to the very survival of SEYCHELLES some Commonwealth countries, notably small island states. We are also conscious SIERRA LEONE of the threat to low-lying coastal regions. Climate change can undermine our SINGAPORE SOLOMON ISLANDS continuing efforts to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.
    [Show full text]
  • REACHING the SUMMIT International Cooperation Takes Centre Stage in 2021 22715 Steinway ROSL JUN/AUG21 Kravitz.Qxp Layout 1 15/04/2021 11:03 Page 1
    ISSUE 726 JUNE - AUGUST 2021 REACHING THE SUMMIT International cooperation takes centre stage in 2021 22715 Steinway ROSL JUN/AUG21 Kravitz.qxp_Layout 1 15/04/2021 11:03 Page 1 WELCOME KRAVITZ GRAND LIMITED EDITION The Royal Over-Seas League is dedicated A COLLABORATION WITH WORLD-RENOWNED MUSICIAN to championing international friendship and understanding through cultural and education “ Whilst travel has AND MODERN-DAY RENAISSANCE MAN LENNY KRAVITZ activities around the Commonwealth and beyond. A not-for-profit private members’ organisation, we’ve been bringing like-minded people been restricted, it's together since 1910. OVERSEAS EDITORIAL TEAM business as usual on Editor Mr Mark Brierley: [email protected]; +44 (0)20 7408 0214 Design the international stage” zed creative: www.zedcreative.co.uk Advertising [email protected] By the time this edition hits the doorstep, ROSL will have reopened its [email protected] doors. After what has been a long and difficult time for members and staff, ROYAL OVER-SEAS LEAGUE we’ll be into a wonderful spring and summer. We’re bursting into action Incorporated by Royal Charter Patron HM The Queen with the addition of two key new members of the team following our Vice-Patron HRH Princess Alexandra KG GCVO decision to take catering back in house – highly experienced Food and President The Rt Hon The Lord Geidt GCB GCVO OBE QSO PC Beverage Manager Serge Pradier, and Executive Chef Elliot Plimmer, who Chairman The Hon. Alexander Downer AC has Michelin starred experience. We will welcome
    [Show full text]
  • Selected International Legal Materials on Global Warming and Climate Change
    American University International Law Review Volume 5 | Issue 2 Article 11 1990 Selected International Legal Materials on Global Warming and Climate Change Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Center for International Environmental Law. "Selected International Legal Materials on Global Warming and Climate Change." American University International Law Review 5, no. 2 (1990): 513-634. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SELECTED MATERIALS SELECTED INTERNATIONAL LEGAL MATERIALS ON GLOBAL WARMING AND CLIMATE CHANGE The following primer is a collection of selected international legal materials for climate change, global warming, and sea level rise. These materials comprise a significant portion of documents and information which has been devised, and is being actively utilized, to confront emerging issues in international environmental law. Participants in the drafting of the various materials include high- level delegates and other representatives of sovereign nations, official members of international organizations (e.g., the U.N., UNEP, IPCC, and WMO) who are often responsible for coordinating, promoting, and hosting these meetings, and agents of non-governmental organizations attempting to get involved in the early stages of a global climate change convention. These materials document the evolution of the in- ternational understanding and agreement on the scientific, policy, and legal aspects of climate change, global warming, and sea level rise and accentuate the differences and disputes which will inevitably be the fo- cus of future deliberations.
    [Show full text]
  • THE OPENING of the INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE on BIODIVERSITY HOLIDAY VILLA HOTEL, SUBANG, 12 JUNE 1990 Distinguished Guests; Ladies and Gentlemen
    THE OPENING OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIODIVERSITY HOLIDAY VILLA HOTEL, SUBANG, 12 JUNE 1990 Distinguished guests; Ladies and gentlemen. I would like to thank the Council Members of the Malayan Nature Society for inviting me to officiate the opening of this International Conference on Biodiversity. The conservation of biodiversity is of global concern and I am glad that the Malayan Nature Society has given emphasis to this topic. Ladies and gentlemen, 2. Malaysia is endowed with a great diversity of species in its forests and other natural habitats such as rivers, lakes and surrounding seas. Over 10,000 species of flower- ing plants, about 2,000 species of vertebrates and about 80,000 invertebrate species have been documented in this country. Only a small proportion of these resources has been utilized for our needs. As a medical man, I am aware of the many plants that are used in traditional medicine. I have no doubt that scientific investigation will reveal that many of these can replace some of the synthetic drugs and can provide new medicinal compounds. 3. What is of significance is that there is a high degree of endemism of these species in the country. Botanical studies in Peninsular Malaysia have shown that up to 30% of all tree species and 50% of the orchids are not found any- where else. Biological diversity needs to be conserved to ensure that there remain genetic resources in this world for the further propagation and domestication of potential crops and animals as our forefathers had done with those which we are familiar with today.
    [Show full text]
  • Langkawi Declaration on the Environment
    22 / Commonwealth Declarations Langkawi Declaration on the Environment Malaysia, 1989 1. We, the Heads of Government of the Commonwealth, representing a quarter of the world’s population and a broad cross-section of global interests, are deeply concerned at the serious deterioration in the environment and the threat this poses to the well-being of present and future generations. Any delay in taking action to halt this progressive deterioration will result in permanent and irreversible damage. 2. The current threat to the environment, which is a common concern of all mankind, stems essentially from past neglect in managing the natural environment and resources. The environment has been degraded by decades of industrial and other forms of pollution, including unsafe disposal of toxic wastes, the burning of fossil fuels, nuclear testing and non-sustainable practices in agriculture, fishery and forestry. 3. The main environmental problems facing the world are the ‘greenhouse effect’ (which may lead to severe climatic changes that could include floods, drought and rising sea levels), the depletion of the ozone layer, acid rain, marine pollution, land degradation and the extinction of numerous animal and plant species. Some developing countries also face distinct environmental problems arising from poverty and population pressures. In addition, some islands and low-lying areas of other countries, are threatened by the prospect of rising sea level. 4. Many environmental problems transcend national boundaries and interests, necessitating a co-ordinated global effort. This is particularly true in areas outside national jurisdiction, and where there is transboundary pollution on land and in the oceans, atmosphere and outer space.
    [Show full text]
  • Valletta Harare Cyber World Trade Ottawa Fancourt Okanagan
    London Declaration CommonwealthValletta Principles Gleneagles Agreement Apartheid in Sport World Trade RespectLusaka and Racism and Racial Prejudice Okanagan UnderstandingMelbourne Goa Kuala Lumpur International Security New Delhi Economic Action Langkwai Nassau World Order Harare Southern Africa Ottawa Limassol Millbrook EconomicEdinburgh Action Cyber Commonwealth Fancourt Declarations Coolum Aso Rock Zimbabwe Vancouver Ce leb rat ing Commonwealth Declarations Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom © Commonwealth Secretariat 2019 All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or otherwise provided it is used only for education purposes and is not for resale, and provided full acknowledgement is given to the Commonwealth Secretariat as the original publisher. Wherever possible, the Commonwealth Secretariat uses paper sourced from responsible forests or from sources that minimise a destructive impact on the environment. Copies of this publication may be obtained from Commonwealth Secretariat Marlborough House Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HX United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)20 7747 6500 Contents / iii Contents Topics v Foreword ix Declaration Signed by the Five Prime Ministers 1 London Declaration 3 Declaration by Commonwealth Prime Ministers 5 The Declaration of Commonwealth Principles 8 The Lusaka Declaration of the Commonwealth on
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Alliance of Youth Work Association Constitution
    COMMONWEALTH ALLIANCE OF YOUTH WORK ASSOCIATION CONSTITUTION 1 NAME The Association’s name is: Commonwealth Alliance of Youth Work Associations 2 PURPOSE Introduction The Commonwealth Youth Program has a clear agenda to professionalise Youth Work throughout the Commonwealth. This is recognition of the value and impact that Youth Workers, Youth Ministries and Youth Development Workers have in communities. The Commonwealth refer to it as the theory of change. In essence, providing Youth Work education and professionalising Youth Work will improve systemic responses to young people; provide them with quality services to enact change. On Sunday 6th March 2016 a dedicated group of representatives from Youth Work Associations around the Commonwealth met in a pre-meeting to the 2nd Commonwealth Youth Conference with the aim to form a Commonwealth Alliance of Youth Work Associations. The agreement was struck and as such an interim steering committee came together to build the Alliance. The forming of the Alliance is both symbolic and practical. It is symbolic to establish a Commonwealth alliance that sends a clear message of the importance and status of Youth Work. It is practical because the Alliance will build resources to support National Youth Work Associations. We will learn from each other what we should be aiming for and gain confidence in our own professional status. Our Purpose To raise the standard and status of youth work by connecting, strengthening and championing youth work professionalisation across the Commonwealth. Strategic Priorities • To establish the Commonwealth Alliance as a professional peak body supporting the development of national Youth Work professional associations. • To provide strategic advice to the Commonwealth Youth Program on the Professionalisation of Youth Work.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wetness of the Third
    Climate Change and Commonwealth Nations Clive Hamilton Hal Turton Paul Pollard Number 40 October 2001 THE AUSTRALIA INSTITUTE Climate Change and Commonwealth Nations Clive Hamilton Hal Turton Paul Pollard Discussion Paper Number 40 October 2001 ISSN 1322-5421 ii © The Australia Institute. This work is copyright. It may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes only with the written permission of the Australia Institute. Such use must not be for the purposes of sale or commercial exploitation. Subject to the Copyright Act 1968, reproduction, storage in a retrieval system or transmission in any form by any means of any part of the work other than for the purposes above is not permitted without written permission. Requests and inquiries should be directed to the Australia Institute. The Australia Institute iii Contents List of Tables and Figures iv List of Abbreviations iv Summary v 1. The Commonwealth’s mission 1 2. Climate change and Commonwealth developing countries 3 3. Commonwealth principles violated 9 4. The politics of climate change 11 References 15 Appendix 17 Commonwealth and Climate Change iv List of Tables and Figures Table 1 Expected impacts of climate change on Commonwealth countries 4 Table 2 Key characteristics of some Commonwealth countries 10 Figure 1 Changes in crop yields and sea level rise in Commonwealth countries 7 Figure 2 Greenhouse gas emissions per person in selected Commonwealth countries 10 Box 1 Climate change and Commonwealth developing countries 5 Box 2 What the climate treaties say
    [Show full text]