Biafra and the Bureaucrats
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE COUNCIL for EXCELLENCE in GOVERNMENT Elliot Richardson Prize Event Acceptance Remarks
THE COUNCIL FOR EXCELLENCE IN GOVERNMENT Elliot Richardson Prize Event Acceptance Remarks Washington, D. C. March 8, 2004 Remarks By Sandra Day O’Connor Associate Justice, Supreme Court of the United States Building Bridges: The Rewarding Life of Public Service An old man, going a lone highway Came at the evening, cold and gray To a chasm, vast and deep and wide, Through which was flowing a sullen tide. The old man crossed in the twilight dim; The sullen stream had no fears for him; But he turned when safe on the other side And built a bridge to span the tide. “Old man,” said a fellow pilgrim near, “You are wasting strength with building here; Your journey will end with the ending day; You never again must pass this way; You have crossed the chasm, deep and wide— Why build you the bridge at the eventide?” The builder lifted his old gray head. “Good friend, in the path I have come,” he said, “There followeth after me today A youth whose feet must pass this way. This chasm that has been naught to me To that fair-haired youth may a pitfall be. He, too, must cross in the twilight dim; Good friend, I am building the bridge for him.” By Will Allen Dromgoole The Bridge Builder Council for Excellence in Government — Page 2 If I may, I would like to take a few moments this afternoon to talk about building bridges. Building bridges through public service Of all of the reasons that I am honored to receive this touching recognition today, the greatest is that it puts me in the company of some truly remarkable individuals who dedicated their lives to building bridges for the future of our country. -
The US Experiment with Government Ownership of the Telephone
University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 4-1-2013 The Wires Go to War: The U.S. Experiment with Government Ownership of the Telephone System During World War I Michael A. Janson Federal Communications Commission Christopher S. Yoo University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Communications Law Commons, Economic History Commons, Legal History Commons, Other Business Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Janson, Michael A. and Yoo, Christopher S., "The Wires Go to War: The U.S. Experiment with Government Ownership of the Telephone System During World War I" (2013). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 467. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/467 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles The Wires Go to War: The U.S. Experiment with Government Ownership of the Telephone System During World War I Michael A. Janson* & Christopher S. Yoo** One of the most distinctive characteristics of the U.S. telephone system is that it has always been privately owned, in stark contrast to the pattern of government ownership followed by virtually every other nation. What is not widely known is how close the United States came to falling in line with the rest of the world. -
For State:Health Care
The Case for Impeachmet of- ichard Nixon., Part V Richard M. Nixon has com- such a way that we make major mitted an impeachable offense This article, sixth of a series, is reprinted fro&m the AFL-CIO impact on a basis which the net- by interfering with the constitu- News: the. official publication of the American Federation of Labor works, newspapers and Congress tionally guaranteed freedom of and Congress of Industrial Organizations, 815 Sixteenth Sttreet, will react to and begin to look at the press by means of wiretaps, NW,-. -W.ashington, DC. 20006. things somewhat differently. It T1I investigations and tireats is my opinion that we should be- d punitive action. requesting specific action relat- "It is my opinion this contin- gin concentrated efforts in a On Octeber 17, i9m, -former ing to what could be considered ual daily attempt to get to the number of major areas that will Yhite Rise aide Jeb Start unfair news coverage. In media or to anti-Administration have much more impact on the lagnir wt former FPtal- the short time that I have been spokesmen because of specific media and other anti-Adminis- enUtal Assat Ji. Halde- here, I would gather that there things they have said is very un- tration spokesmen and will do sian: have been at least double or fruitful and wasteful of our more good in the long run. The "I have enclosed from t-he log triple- this many requests made time. following is my suggestion as to approximately 21 requets from through- other parties to accom- "The real problem . -
Roberts Papers, 1973-77
John W. “Bill” Roberts Papers, 1973-77 Oral Diary, July 24-September 12, 1974 In 1991, Bill Roberts donated to the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library 14 linear feet of papers covering his work as an assistant press secretary to Gerald R. Ford during both the vice presidency and presidency. The collection includes Roberts's personal observations and recollections, which he tape- recorded every few days during July, August, and September 1974. These recollections, on four audio cassettes, provide insight into the last days of the Ford vice presidency, the transition to the presidency, and the persons and personalities involved in the events. The diary begins and ends abruptly, and it is sporadic. It covers only this brief period in time and is not part of a more complete diary. The Ford Library created the transcript that appears on succeeding pages of this document. Roberts, 7/24/74-9/12/74 - 1 July 24, 1974 Wednesday I'm starting this recording on July 24th. On the morning of July 24th, the Supreme Court, 8-0, ordered the President to surrender the tapes. The Vice President heard about this shortly after the Court decision was made public and decided that he wouldn't say anything as far as the press was concerned until or unless the President made some sort of response. We had quite a problem in fending off the press inquiries which were coming in at a great rate. The complicating factor was that CBS that day had chosen and been given the chance to follow the Vice President wherever he went, photograph him, and do a day in the life of the Vice President. -
Contents (Click on Index Item to Locate)
Contents (Click on index item to locate) Subject Page Introductory Note 1 June 22 1972 Excerpt from the President’s News Conference 2 August 29 1972 Excerpts from the President’s News Conference 3 October 5 1972 Excerpts from the President’s News Conference 4 March 2 1973 Excerpts from the President’s News Conference 5 March 12 1973 Statement by the President on Executive Privilege 6 March 15 1973 Excerpts from the President’s News Conference 8 April 5 1973 Statement by the president on the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. 11 April 17 1973 Remarks by the President Regarding Investigation Development and Procedure 12 April 30 1973 Statement by the President on the Attorney General and White House Staff 13 April 30 1973 Address to Nation on the Watergate Investigation 14 May 9 1973 Remarks by the President at a Republican Fundraising Dinner 19 May 22 1973 Statements by the President on the Watergate Investigation 21 July 6 1973 Letter from the President to Chairman Sam J Ervin Jr 26 July 16 1973 Letter from the President to the Secretary of the Treasury 28 July 23 1973 Letter from the President to Chairman Sam J Ervin Jr 29 July 25 1973 Letter from the President to Chairman Sam J Ervin Jr 30 July 25 1973 Letter from the President to Chief justice Judge John J Sirica 31 August 5 1973 Address to the Nation on the Watergate investigation 32 August 15 1973 Statement by the President on the Watergate Investigation 40 August 22 1973 Excerpts from the President’s News Conference 44 September 5 1973 Excerpts from the President’s -
Bliss, Donald T
The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Affairs Oral History Project AMBASSADOR DONALD T. BLISS Interviewed by: Charles Stuart Kennedy Initial interview date: November 21st, 2013 Copyright 2015 ADST TABLE OF CONTENTS Background Born, Norwalk, Connecticut, 1941 B.A. Principia College, 1963 J.D. Harvard Law School, 1966 Entered the Peace Corps Volunteer in Micronesia, 1966-1968 Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) 1969-1973 Executive Secretary under the Honorable Elliot L. Richardson Department of Transportation 1973 Special Assistant (S-3) to Secretary of Transportation William (Bill) T. Coleman II U.S. Agency for International Development 1974-1975 Executive Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1975-1976 General Counsel Partner at O’Melveny and Myers LLP 1977-2006 Chair of Aviation and Transport American Bar Association (ABA) 1999-2001 Chair of the Air and Space Law Forum International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Council 2006-2009 Appointed by George W. Bush as Permanent U.S. Representative to ICAO, held rank of Ambassador United National Association-National Capital Area 2009-2013 President of the UNA-NCA, 1 Retired (2013) INTERVIEW Q: Today is the 21st of November, 2013 with Ambassador Donald T. Bliss, B-L-I-S-S, and this is being done on behalf of the Association of Diplomatic Studies and Training. And I’m Charles Stuart Kennedy. And you go by Don. BLISS: Right. Q: All right, let’s start at the beginning. Where and when were you born? BLISS: I was born on November 24, 1941 in Norwalk, Connecticut. Q: OK. Let’s get a little family background. -
Why Didn't Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NSU Works Nova Law Review Volume 18, Issue 3 1994 Article 7 Why Didn’t Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate Stephen E. Ambrose∗ ∗ Copyright c 1994 by the authors. Nova Law Review is produced by The Berkeley Electronic Press (bepress). https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nlr Ambrose: Why Didn't Nixon Burn the Tapes and Other Questions About Waterga Why Didn't Nixon Bum the Tapes and Other Questions About Watergate Stephen E. Ambrose* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................... 1775 II. WHY DID THEY BREAK IN? ........... 1776 III. WHO WAS DEEP THROAT? .......... .. 1777 IV. WHY DIDN'T NIXON BURN THE TAPES? . 1778 V. VICE PRESIDENT FORD AND THE PARDON ........ 1780 I. INTRODUCTION For almost two years, from early 1973 to September, 1974, Watergate dominated the nation's consciousness. On a daily basis it was on the front pages-usually the headline; in the news magazines-usually the cover story; on the television news-usually the lead. Washington, D.C., a town that ordinarily is obsessed by the future and dominated by predictions about what the President and Congress will do next, was obsessed by the past and dominated by questions about what Richard Nixon had done and why he had done it. Small wonder: Watergate was the political story of the century. Since 1974, Watergate has been studied and commented on by reporters, television documentary makers, historians, and others. These commentators have had an unprecedented amount of material with which to work, starting with the tapes, the documentary record of the Nixon Administration, other material in the Nixon Presidential Materials Project, plus the transcripts of the various congressional hearings, the courtroom testimony of the principal actors, and the memoirs of the participants. -
Post-Presidential Papers, 1961-69 1964 PRINCIPAL FILE Series
EISENHOWER, DWIGHT D.: Post-Presidential Papers, 1961-69 1964 PRINCIPAL FILE Series Description The 1964 Principal File, which was the main office file for Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Gettysburg Office, is divided into two subseries--a subject file and an alphabetical file. The subject subseries consists of a little over twenty-three boxes of material, and it is arranged alphabetically by subject. This subseries contains such categories as appointments, autographs, endorsements, gifts, invitations, memberships, memoranda, messages, political affairs, publications, statements, and trips. Invitations generated the greatest volume of correspondence, followed by appointments, messages, and gifts. Documentation in this subseries includes correspondence, schedules, agendas, articles, memoranda, transcripts of interviews, and reports. The alphabetical subseries, which has a little over thirty-four boxes, is arranged alphabetically by names of individuals and organizations. It is primarily a correspondence file, but it also contains printed materials, speeches, cross-reference sheets, interview transcripts, statements, clippings, and photographs. During 1964 Eisenhower was receiving correspondence from the public at the rate of over fifty thousand letters a year. This placed considerable strain on Eisenhower and his small office staff, and many requests for appointments, autographs, speeches, endorsements, and special messages met with a negative response. Although the great bulk of the correspondence in this series involves routine matters, there are considerable letters and memoranda which deal with national and international issues, events, and personalities. Some of the subjects discussed in Eisenhower’s correspondence include the 1964 presidential race, NATO, the U.S. space program, the U. S. economy, presidential inability and succession, defense policies, civil rights legislation, political extremists, and Cuba. -
National Bulletin Volume 28 No
American Association of Teachers of French NATIONAL BULLETIN VOLUME 28 NO. 4 APRIL 2003 Nous vous invitons à vous joindre à nous espérons vous voir nombreux au nuit en route et assurent un vol sans arrêt nous pour le 76ème Congrès de l’AATF en Banquet de gala lundi le 7 juillet. Chacun de Fort Lauderale ou de San Juan à Fort- Martinique du 4 au 7 juillet prochains. Ce des hôtels propose aussi des excursions et de-France. De même, Carib Congrès nous sera la deuxième fois où nous nous visites auxquelles vous pouvez vous a obtenu des tarifs d’hôtel extrêmement réunissons en Martinique. L’ambiance inscrire sur place. Nous vous rappelons intéressants et nous voudrions en remercier des îles, le climat chaud et ensoleillé, une aussi qu’un pass sur le bac entre la Pointe- les directeurs Éric et Olivier De La cuisine qui marie les influences créoles et du-Bout et Fort-de-France est inclus dans Houssaye. Les hôtels sont climatisés avec les produits locaux avec le meilleur de la l’inscription au congrès, ce qui vous per- de belles vues sur les plages et la Pointe- gastronomie française et un peuple cha- mettra de faire autant d’aller-retours que du-Bout à des prix très raisonnables. Vous LA MARTINIQUE VOUS ATTEND AU CONGRÈS DE L’AATF leureux et accueillant nous trouverez tous les ren- attendent. seignements sur les hôtels Nous avons préparé et sur les vols affichés sur un programme de haute notre site Web à [http:// qualité (pages 24-32) www.frenchteachers.org]. -
Burch, Dean” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R
The original documents are located in Box 126, folder “Burch, Dean” of the Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Ron Nessen donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. -·--~-....----------------------------- Digitized from Box 126 of The Ron Nessen Papers at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library - - THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON November 5, 1974 MEMORANDUM FOR RON NESSEN FROM: DEANBURCH ~ Kitty Kelly, whom I mentioned to you yesterday, is very much interested in joining your shop. Kitty has spent four years on the Hill, 2 years on the Washington Post editorial page, and 3 years with the Washingtonian magazine, among other assignments. Kitty has apparently been in touch with Lou Thompson and I'm sure he could give you further information. Kitty is in Stockbridge, Massachusetts this week finishing a book but can be reached at (413) 298-3177. I'd really appreciate it if you'd look her over. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON November MEMORANDUM FOR: DONALD R UMSFELD FROM: DEAN BURCH SUBJECT: RNC Action Program I Presidential Message The options are (a) to go with something like my version of Mary Louise's message; (b) to go· with a much briefer Presidential call to- action, with strong but general assurances of close collaboration between the WH and RNC toward '76; or (c) to go with nothing. -
Viewpoint of the News. Mr. Higgins Stated That Mr. Agnew Or Anyone Else Has a Perfect Right to Speak out Against the Press. Mr
355 viewpoint of the news. Mr. Higgins stated that Mr. Agnew or anyone else has a perfect right to speak out against the press. Mr. Jonathan Marshall, editor of the Scottsdale Progress, stated that there is a new executive agency headed by Mr. Whitehead who have instituted some tight regulations on the broadcasting industry and they are using scare tactics on the broadcasters. Senator Swink moved the bill with a DO PASS recommendation. The bill failed SENATE BILL 1303—Reporter's Privileged Communication Mr. Jonathan Marshall stated that with the provisions in this bill a reporter could not have a subpoena served against him if he were to leave the employ of a media service. Senator O'Connor asked Mr. Marshall what would have happened in the case of the Kennedy and Wallace shootings if the reporter did not wish to turn over the films of these shootings to the authorities. After a brief discussion, Senator O'Connor moved the bill and proposed amendments to the bill. The amendments pass. The bill was moved with a DO PASS recommendation as amended and passed. SENATE BILL 1267—Implied Consent—License Suspension This bill had been in subcommittee chaired by Senator Roeder. John Jones of the Attorney General's Office spoke to the committee in regard for the need for the implied consent legislation. Senator Roeder introduced amendments that had been prepared in the subcommittee. Senator Roeder moved the bill with a DO PASS recommendation as amended. His motion passed. SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 1022—Recall Election Senator O'Connor moved this bill stating that this was a companion bill to House Bill 2020, initiative, referendum and recall. -
The Malpractice Law Firm Jack H. Olender & Associates
A SPECIAL ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT TO THE WASHINGTON POST PRESENTS PRESENTS WASH ING TON D .C. & BALTIMOR E ’S WASHINGTON D.C. & BALTIMORE’S ™ ™ THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN WASHINGTON D.C. & BALTIMORE THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN WASHINGTON D.C. & BALTIMORE TOP2012 EDITIONRATEDLAWYERS TOP2012 E DITIONRATEDLAWYERS HOWARD JANET CHAIKIN, SHERMAN, TOP CASES: SCHOCHOR, FEDERICO AND STATON, P.A. WHISTLEBLOWER CAMMARATA & SIEGEL, P.C. OVER $700 MILLION IN VERDICTS & PENN STATE HOWARD JANET ABRAMS TOP CASES: LANDAU, LTD. AGGRESSIVE LEADERS IN PERSONAL INJURY & SETTLEMENTS IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE ABRAMS RIFKIN, LIVINGSTON, WHISTLEBLOWER ENSURING THAT LANDAU, LTD. LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC & PENN STATE CLIENTS FEEL AT HOME ENSURING THAT BRINGING A SMALL-FIRM, CLIENTS FEEL AT HOME HANDS-ON APPROACH TO SCHOCHOR, FEDERICO RIFKIN, LIVINGSTON, SALSBURY, CLEMENTS, LARGE-FIRM LITIGATION AND STATON, P.A. LEVITAN & SILVER, LLC BEKMAN, MARDER & ADKINS L.L.C. OVER $700 MILLION IN BRINGING A SMALL-FIRM, PULLING MILLION-DOLLAR VERDICTS SALSBURY, CLEMENTS, CHAIKIN, SHERMAN, VERDICTS & SETTLEMENTS HANDS-ON APPROACH TO IN INTRICATE CASES BEKMAN, MARDER & ADKINS L.L.C. CAMMARATA & SIEGEL, P.C. IN MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LARGE-FIRM LITIGATION PULLING MILLION-DOLLAR VERDICTS AGGRESSIVE LEADERS IN INTRICATE CASES IN PERSONAL INJURY A SPECIAL ADVERTISING SUPPLEMENT IN A SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT TO A SPECIAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE BALTIMORE SUN PRESENTS PRESENTS WASHINGTON D.C. & BALTIMORE’S WASHINGTON D.C. & BALTIMORE’S ™ ™ THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN WASHINGTON D.C. & BALTIMORE THE DEFINITIVE GUIDE TO LEGAL REPRESENTATION IN WASHINGTON D.C. & BALTIMORE TOP2012 E DITIONRATEDLAWYERS TOP2012 E DITIONRATEDLAWYERS ABRAMS LANDAU, LTD. ENSURING THAT ABRAMS HOWARD JANET SALSBURY, CLEMENTS, CHAIKIN, SHERMAN, SCHOCHOR, FEDERICO CLIENTS FEEL AT HOME LANDAU, LTD.