DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015 Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015 ID Rep No Individual/ Para, Policy, Summary of Representation Council Response Organisation Map Background No representation submitted Chapter 1: Rebalancing Employment Land: Proposed Strategic Industrial Locations 65 12 Nathaniel 1.1 Support the removal of Strategic Industrial Support noted and welcomed. Lichfield & Land (SIL) designation and the identification No Proposed Change Partners on for residential-led mixed use redevelopment behalf of under Site SA2 (The Old Vinyl Factory). Purplexed LLP 66 2 Nathaniel 1.1 Support the removal of the Strategic Industrial Support noted and welcomed. Lichfield & Land (SIL) designation and the identification of No Proposed Change Partners on Enterprise House for residential-led mixed use behalf of redevelopment under policy SA1. Workspace Group Chapter 2: Proposed Locally Significant Employment Locations 21 2 The Emerson Map 2.4 Support is given to the identification of the Support noted and welcomed. Group three sites north of the A4 Bath Road as No Proposed Change shown on Map 2.4 and the inclusion of these as Locally Important Employment Areas under Policy DME1 (Employment uses in Designated Sites). Concerns expressed that the proposed expansion of Heathrow Airport will increase industrial vacancy rates. 146 Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015 ID Rep No Individual/ Para, Policy, Summary of Representation Council Response Organisation Map Policy DME2 (Employment Uses Outside of Designated Sites) is a logical attempt to underpin the broad policies in the Core Strategy to accommodate the required 9,000 jobs over the plan period. Chapter 3: Proposed locally Significant Industrial Sites 53 6 Cllr Janet Duncan Chapter 3 Supports the removal of the Old Coal Yard site Supported noted and welcomed. in Tavistock Road, Yiewsley from the IBA Proposed Change designation as detailed work and information have shown that it is not suitable for an Officers propose to allocate the Old Coal industrial designation and high generation of Yard Site for residential led mixed use HGVs. development. An appropriate scheme for the site will be identified in the revised version of The close proximity of the site to a Crossrail the Site Allocations document, which will be station and bus station would encourage issued for consultation in May of this year. mixed use development which minimises the need for car parking and does not generate HGV traffic. Crossrail investment encouraging higher employment uses should be maximised, to support both the local town centres of Yiewsley and West Drayton and the local economy. The removal of this site has made the plan sounder and good development is achievable. Chapter 4: Deletion from the Green Belt Boundary 73 1 Mercer Planning Chapter 4 Request that 59 Reservoir Road be excluded An extensive review of the Green Belt was Consultants Ltd from the Green Belt as it does not meet the undertaken in 2013. Officers are of the view on behalf of Mr. R tests outlined in the NPPF. Consider that a that there are no exceptional circumstances 147 Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015 ID Rep No Individual/ Para, Policy, Summary of Representation Council Response Organisation Map Mahmud detailed review of existing Green Belt to the justify exclusion of 59 Reservoir Road boundaries should be carried out. as required by the NPPF. The site meets two of the purposes for including land in the Green Belt as identified in the NPPF - to prevent unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas and to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment. The current boundary is based on existing definable physical features whereas the deletion of the site from the Green Belt would result in a Green Belt boundary that was no longer clearly defined. No Proposed Change 26 7 Nexus Planning Chapter 4: The Trust made separate representations to The release of Green Belt land is not on behalf of Deletion from the Local Plan Part 2 in respect of land at the necessary to meet Hillingdon's current Hillingdon Green Belt Mount Vernon Hospital Site. Amongst other housing target contained in the Local Plan Hospital NHS things, these representations seek the Part 1 or the revised target contained in the Foundation Trust following: Further Alterations to the London Plan. This is reflected in policy EM2 of the Local Plan i) The removal of land at the Mount Vernon Part 1, which seeks to maintain the current Hospital Site from the Green Belt. extent, hierarchy and strategic functions of ii) Deletion of the proposed extension to the the Green Belt, Metropolitan Open Land and Grade I SINC to include land at the Mount Green Chains in Hillingdon. Vernon Hospital Site (Ref. SINC Ext 13). Policy 7.16 of the London Plan states that iii) The allocation of land at the Mount Vernon the Mayor strongly supports the current Hospital Site as a housing site. extent of London's Green Belt. As such, the London-wide Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment, which formed the basis of Hillingdon's revised Annual Monitoring target for housing provision, did not identify sites in the Green Belt. A further review of SINC boundaries will be undertaken prior to the examination, in 148 Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015 ID Rep No Individual/ Para, Policy, Summary of Representation Council Response Organisation Map accordance with the recommendation contained in the Cabinet report. No Proposed Change 56 1 Heathrow Airport Map 4.2 Support the deletion of Former Perry Oaks Support noted and welcomed Ltd Sludge Works Site and consider the A3044 Proposed removal Proposed Change marks a logical boundary. of Terminal 5 The area of land with planning permission Business Car However, a further area of Green Belt requires for the Terminal 5 Business Car Park will be Park removal at the site of the T5 Business Car removed from the Green Belt. Park. Given the site’s isolation from other Green Belt land as a result of the realignment of the Duke of Northumberland’s River and the development of this area as car parking, it is not considered that the land designated as Green Belt at Longford Park to the south of the River serves a Green Belt function. Request redefining the Green Belt boundary along the river and the airport boundary so that it corresponds with the Green Belt boundary in this location. Chapter 5: Additions to the Green Belt Boundary 3 1 Kenneth Morgan Map 5.1 Considers that white area at the rear of the Proposed Change houses in Merle Ave and the Sports Ground has no natural boundary. Asks why is it that The Green Belt boundary will be amended to particular shape and why is it coloured white? include the land to the rear of Merle Avenue On site it is just part of one large field with only up to the western boundary of the Sports access via a farmyard or public footpath. Ground. This forms a clearly defined Suggests including the area into the Green boundary for the Green Belt in accordance Belt. with the NPPF. 149 Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015 ID Rep No Individual/ Para, Policy, Summary of Representation Council Response Organisation Map 4 1 Anthony Crane Map 5.1 The sports field for Harefield school and the adjoining land is not included as proposed new Green Belt. Proposed Change Considers that including the sports field into The Green Belt boundary will be amended to the Green Belt would ensure that the Olympic include the land to the rear of Merle Avenue legacy of sport facilities is up held for local up to the western boundary of the Sports people. Ground. This forms a clearly defined Half the adjacent field surrounding the sports boundary for the Green Belt in accordance field is already in the Green Belt. Considers with the NPPF. that it is therefore illogical not to include the whole field. 10 1 Harefield Tenants Map 5.1 Requests that a small plot of land adjacent to Support for extensions to conservation sites and Residents Merle Avenue should be included within the noted. Association Green Belt Boundary. Enquires as to why this Proposed Change (HTRA) (Paul piece of land has not been included as it Stone) meets the same criteria as neighbouring The Green Belt boundary will be amended to Green Belt land. include the land to the rear of Merle Avenue up to the western boundary of the Sports Requests that the Green Belt boundary be Ground. This forms a clearly defined extended to include a neighbouring sports boundary for the Green Belt in accordance pitch. with the NPPF. HTRA are delighted to note extensions to nature conservation sites on the Proposals Map, but are concerned about the potential loss of the land at the rear and the end of Merle Avenue and the Sports Ground (School Playing field). The current Green Belt boundary is illogical and requests the inclusion of a small parcel of land at the rear and the end of Merle Avenue in to the Green Belt to create a definable and logical boundary. HRTA petitions also for the sports ground to 150 Appendix 3: Policies Map Atlas of Changes: Schedule of Representations Received and Officer Responses February 2015 ID Rep No Individual/ Para, Policy, Summary of Representation Council Response Organisation Map be granted Green Belt status within the Local Plan Part 2 and urge the Council to do all they can to ensure that these excellent facilities are preserved for future generations.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colne River Valley
    1. Colne River Valley Key plan Description The Colne River Valley Natural Landscape Area follows the Colne Within the northern Colne Valley, the settlement pattern is relatively River north to south on the western fringe of Greater London, from sparse, although there is a corridor of villages along the Grand Union Stocker’s Lake near Batchworth in the north to Heathrow Airport in Canal. To the south the valley is more densely developed than the the south. Between Batchworth and Uxbridge the valley floor consists north, with industrial towns such as Uxbridge, Yiewsley and West of a series of lakes and reservoirs, edged by ridges and plateaux within Drayton and London’s largest airport, Heathrow. The historic cores the neighbouring Ruislip Plateau (NLA 2) and the Hayes Gravels (NLA which remain within the settlements of Harefield, Uxbridge, West 10). As the River Colne meanders south and the Grand Union Canal Drayton and Harmondsworth suggest how settlement patterns have heads east, the topography gradually levels; historically the River evolved within this area. Despite the intense residential and industrial Colne would have meandered wider here, resulting in an extensive development around Uxbridge, the linear open space corridors area of deep silt soil across an exceptionally wide floodplain. The that follow the River Colne, Grand Union Canal and the lakes that Colne River Valley has been and continues to be important both as a they support are dominant landscape features. The waterways and 1. Colne River Valley River Colne 1. source of water and for trade navigation. lakes are typically bordered by marginal wetland vegetation and wooded areas.
    [Show full text]
  • COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE on the EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018
    COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE ON THE EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018 Chair of Landscape Partnership Lead Partner Colne Valley Park Community Interest Company Friends of the Colne Valley Park Spelthorne Natural History Society Front cover photo of Stockers Lake – Greg Townsend provide an essential project management tool for effective and efficient delivery. The partnership involved in preparing this LCAP considers it to be a compelling, innovative and realistic bid, with a range of projects which will connect people, biodiversity and access. ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ meets all the objectives of the Heritage Lottery Landscape The Landscape Partnership programme, run by the Heritage Lottery Partnership programme, with each of the projects proposed under the Fund, seeks to ‘conserve areas of distinctive landscape character’ and Scheme meeting at least one objective. promote a ‘holistic and balanced approach to the management of landscape heritage at a landscape scale’. Landscape Conservation Action Covering parts of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Greater London, Plans (LCAPs) required as part of this programme, provide the foundation Hertfordshire and Surrey, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ will for planned work to benefit heritage, people and communities and are harness and stimulate organisations and communities across the area to needed in order to secure the Heritage Lottery Fund grant towards the support and sustain delivery. Residents and visitors will gain positive proposed work. perceptions about the area, will learn more about the landscape and feel more confident about exploring it. They will be supported to assist in Our LCAP, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’, comprises a suite of ‘shaping their place’, and feel more motivated to venture out and enjoy exciting projects (the Scheme), and seeks to: set these in the landscape the area, and to participate in efforts to improve and maintain it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ickenham HCA FINAL 2018
    Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment November 2018 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Quality information Prepared by Checked by Approved by Sam Griffiths Richard Hammond Mary Kucharska Landscape Architect, AECOM Associate Landscape Architect, Senior Consultant, AECOM AECOM Joe Critchley Built Heritage Consultant, AECOM Revision History Revision Revision date Details Name Position A 03/10/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Ickenham Neighbourhood Group Comments B 15/11/18 Incorporation of Sam Griffiths Landscape Architect Locality’s comments Prepared for: Locality AECOM 2 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Prepared for: Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum Prepared by: AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited 36 Storey's Way Cambridgeshire Cambridge CB3 0DT UK T: +44 1223 488 000 aecom.com © 2018 AECOM Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited (“AECOM”) in accordance with its contract with Locality (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. AECOM shall have no liability to any third party that makes use of or relies upon this document Prepared for: Locality AECOM 3 Ickenham Heritage and Character Assessment Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Residents' and Environmental Services Policy Overview Committee
    Public Document Pack Councillors on the Committee Residents' and Michael White (Chairman) Environmental Teji Barnes (Vice-Chairman) Mohinder Birah Peter Davis Services Policy Patricia Jackson Kuldeep Lakhmana (Labour Lead) Judy Kelly Overview Brian Stead Jas Dhot Committee Date: WEDNESDAY, 23 MARCH 2016 Time: 5.30 PM Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 5 - CIVIC CENTRE, HIGH STREET, UXBRIDGE UB8 1UW Meeting Members of the Public and Details: Press are welcome to attend this meeting Published: Tuesday, 15 March 2016 Contact: Alex Quayle Tel: 01895 250692 Email: [email protected] This Agenda is available online at: http://modgov.hillingdon.gov.uk/ieListMeetings.aspx?CId=114&Year=0 Putting our residents first Lloyd White Head of Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon, 3E/05, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW www.hillingdon.gov.uk Useful information for residents and visitors Travel and parking Bus routes 427, U1, U3, U4 and U7 all stop at the Civic Centre. Uxbridge underground station, with the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines, is a short walk away. Limited parking is available at the Civic Centre. For details on availability and how to book a parking space, please contact Democratic Services. Please enter from the Council’s main reception where you will be directed to the Committee Room. Accessibility For accessibility options regarding this agenda please contact Democratic Services. For those hard of hearing an Induction Loop System is available for use in the various meeting rooms. Attending, reporting and filming of meetings For the public part of this meeting, residents and the media are welcomed to attend, and if they wish, report on it, broadcast, record or film proceedings as long as it does not disrupt proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Proposed Submission Version
    London Borough of Hillingdon Hillingdon Local Plan Part 2 Proposed Submission Version Summary of Main Issues Arising September 2014 And October 2015 Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................2 1.1 Purpose of the Report...................................................................................................2 2. Outcome of the Consultations undertaken..............................................................3 2.1 Proposed Submission Version September 2014..........................................................3 2.2 Revised Proposed Submission Version October 2015.................................................4 3. Proposed Submission Draft September 2014 : Summary of the Main Issues.....8 3.1 Analysis of the Representations...................................................................................8 3.2 Development Management Policies...........................................................................11 3.3 Site Allocations and Designation / Policies Map........................................................13 3.4 Policies Map - Atlas of Change..................................................................................16 3.5 Conclusion on the Outcome of the Consultation........................................................18 4. Revised Proposed Submission Draft October 2015 : Summary of the Main Issues.....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 2: Evidence Base
    APPENDIX 2: EVIDENCE BASE Appendix 2: Evidence Base COPYRIGHT Greater London Authority August 2017 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 Copies of this report are available from www.london.gov.uk Appendix 2: Evidence Base CONTENTS Air Quality 2 Green Infrastructure 36 Climate Change Mitigation and Energy 51 Waste 68 Adapting to Climate Change 92 Ambient Noise 109 Appendix 2A London Biodiversity Action Plan - Review of Priority Species Appendix 2B London Biodiversity Action Plan – Priority Habitats Appendix 2C London Recycling Routemap 2020 LONDON ENVIRONMENT STRATEGY: EVIDENCE BASE 2 AIR QUALITY Impacts of air quality on health Evidence for the impacts of air pollution on health is extensive, and still growing: a joint review undertaken by the European Union and the World Health Organisation in 2013, the Review of evidence on health aspects of air pollution (REVIHAAP) project1 referenced around 1,000 studies in drawing its conclusions. In the UK, the current state of knowledge on the health impacts of air pollution is kept up to date by the Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants2, and this has been complemented by London specific studies such as those undertaken by the Institute of Medicine and King’s College London. The most recent report, by King’s College London3, estimated that the equivalent of over 9,000 Londoners died prematurely from long-term exposure to air pollution in 2010. This underlines the fact that air quality is the most pressing environmental threat to the future health of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum
    Ickenham Neighbourhood Area and Ickenham Neighbourhood Forum applications Neighbourhood Area application The historic Middlesex village of Ickenham, now part of suburban Greater London, has a strong sense of identity and community spirit. At the 2011 census, roughly 12,000 people lived in the village and our proposed Neighbourhood Area corresponds with local feedback on our borders. These borders have changed over the centuries, but have remained largely constant since the Chiltern railway1 and RAF Northolt divided Ickenham from Harefield and Ruislip 100 years ago, and since the Western Avenue (A40) was constructed to our south in the 1950s. 1 Opened in 1906 as the Great Western and Great Central Joint Railway 1 The five different shaded areas on the map represent the five different London Borough of Hillingdon electoral wards within the Ickenham boundary. The entire Ickemham ward is included, along with parts of four others. Residents’ Associations in neighbouring Ruislip Gardens, Ruislip, North Hillingdon, North Uxbridge and Harefield have all been consulted on the Neighbourhood Area proposal. Put simply, this is Ickenham’s village boundary. To the best of our knowledge, everyone who lives in this area believes that they live in Ickenham, and nobody living outside this area believes that they live in Ickenham. Any other boundary would not be an Ickenham boundary, and would exclude parts of the village that local people know and love. Our northern boundary follows the Chiltern railway. To our east, the whole Ickenham Marshes complex is included, all the way over to the Ruislip Gardens estate. The Stafford Road allotment site in Ruislip Gardens is not included in the area application.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 AGM Chairman's Review of the Year
    2016 AGM Chairman’s review of the year Good evening ladies and gentlemen. I’m Jill Dalton the Association Chairman. Many thanks for turning out in such great numbers once again, despite the weather. Thanks also to our MP Nick Hurd and Ward Councillors Ray Puddifoot, John Hensley and David Simmons for coming tonight and showing their support for Ickenham and its residents. We would also like to welcome Inspector Rob Bryan of the Met Police who is in the audience. We have apologies from our patron Malcolm Beaumont, as well as Hanne and Hans Raeder, Brian and Angie Adams and Ian and Anke Phillips. I’ll now present the reports on subjects from Committee Members Membership Our current membership stands at 3,259 households, an increase of 1.88% despite a reduction in life membership this year. The remaining life member households stand at 72. Our membership therefore stands at approximately 67% of Ickenham households. We continue our links with The Drive Association who also contribute subscriptions to our Association. Our road stewards’ team do an excellent job and we would like to express the committee’s thanks to both them and to our area stewards without whom we would not receive our subscription income and you would not receive your newsletters. We continue to seek assistance in the growing Ickenham Park area to help increase our membership in this area of Ickenham. If anyone is interested in helping us in either capacity, not necessarily in the new development, could they please see either our Membership Secretary, Maureen Pemberton, or any committee member after the formal meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • All London Green Grid River Colne and Crane Area Framework
    All River Colne and Crane London Area Framework Green Grid 10 Contents 1 Foreword and Introduction 2 All London Green Grid Vision and Methodology 3 ALGG Framework Plan 4 ALGG Area Frameworks 5 ALGG Governance 6 Area Strategy 8 Area Description 12 Strategic Context 14 Vision 18 Objectives 22 Opportunities 23 Project Identification 28 Clusters 30 Projects Map 34 Rolling Projects List 44 Phase One Early Delivery 46 Project Details 66 Forward Strategy 68 Gap Analysis 70 Recommendations 72 Appendices 74 Baseline Description 76 ALGG SPG Chapter 5 GGA10 Links 78 Group Membership Note: This area framework should be read in tandem with All London Green Grid SPG Chapter 5 for GGA10 which contains statements in respect of Area Description, Strategic Corridors, Links and Opportunities. The ALGG SPG document is guidance that is supplementary to London Plan policies. While it does not have the same formal development plan status as these policies, it has been formally adopted by the Mayor as supplementary guidance under his powers under the Greater London Authority Act 1999 (as amended). Adoption followed a period of public consultation, and a summary of the comments received and the responses of the Mayor to those comments is available on the Greater London Authority website. It will therefore be a material consideration in drawing up development plan documents and in taking planning decisions. The All London Green Grid SPG was developed in parallel with the area frameworks it can be found at the following link: http://www.london.gov.uk/publication/all-london- green-grid-spg . This part of London is endowed with high quality green space including the spectacular countryside Foreword on the edge of the city in the Colne Valley, the ancient Ruislip Woods and in the Crane Valley, the emerging Crane Park and Yeading Brook Meadows, an extensive area of countryside now entirely encapsulated by the expansion of London.
    [Show full text]
  • Lbr 2008 Front Matter
    London Natural History Society The Society publishes ornithological and other natural history records for the area within 20 miles of St Paul’s Cathedral. As well as Ornithology, other interests in natural history are catered for through the Society's Sections which record and study the major groups of flora and fauna, and the habitats in which they are found. Meetings organised by each Section are open to all members. New members, beginners and experts alike, are welcomed. An extensive programme of talks and field meetings, to which visitors are welcome, is provided throughout the year. As well as the annual London Bird Report, the Society publishes a journal, The London Naturalist, each year and its Newsletter and Bulletin of the London Bird Club every quarter. Members have access to a large lending and reference library of natural history books and can join one or more of several reading circles which circulate many natural history journals at a fraction of the cost of subscribing direct. Yearly subscriptions range from £20 (for ordinary membership) through £16 for senior members (over 65 years and who have been in continuous membership for ten years or more) to £5 for students (under 18 years of age, or receiving full-time education). Additional family members, who enjoy all the benefits of membership except separate publications, pay only £4 each. Cheques should be made payable to the London Natural History Society and sent to the Assistant Treasurer: Robin Blades, 32 Ashfield Road, London N14 7JY. Further copies of this issue of the London Bird Report may be obtained (price £8.00 plus £1.00 postage and packing in the UK) from: Catherine Schmitt, 4 Falkland Avenue, London, N3 1QR.
    [Show full text]
  • Uxbridge Alderglade
    Uxbridge Alderglade y A small urban e l nature reserve l along a wooded a V former railway e embankment, n bordered by the l o ancient Shire ditch C and Frays River. e h t e r Type of habitat Spring o Wet woodland . FINDING THE RESERVE l Listen for chiffchaffs, blackcaps, Uxbridge . wrens and song thrushes. Butter - p Location flies from April onwards including x Best time to visit Spring. speckled woods, orange tips, red admirals, commas and E Size of reserve brimstones along the main path. 2.9ha (7.2 acres) . Walk time 40 minutes. Summer Access on site Kingfishers hunt along Frays Reasonable paths with some steep River. Look up to see kestrels and steps . No wheelchair access. sparrowhawks. If you are quiet, you might be lucky enough to see Walking and cycling a water vole. Grand Union Canal towpath ; Colne Valley Park (Denham Country Winter Park close by); Colne Valley Trail; Flocks of siskins in the alder trees. Section 12 (Uxbridge to Harefield) of the London Loop www.walklondon. org.uk . OS map ref. TQ 057 853 . Postcode UB8 1UJ . Speckled wood Comma Access to site From Braybourne Close or public footpath from Blackcap Harefield Road . Reserve Officer’s tip By road From the M40 towards London take A4020 towards Robert Hopkins Uxbridge. Continue for 1½ miles. “Choose a warm spring day At round about, first exit B467 to enjoy butterflies in the Hare field Road. Turn left onto open glades and the High Street. This is a no through abundant birdsong ” road – turn right into Braybourne Close, park on road.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Annual General Meeting of the Ickenham Residents
    MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE ICKENHAM RESIDENTS’ ASSOCIATION HELD IN THE VILLAGE HALL, SWAKELEYS ROAD, ICKENHAM, ON FRIDAY 22nd April 2016 PRESENT: J Dalton (Chairman & Treasurer), J Reyner (General Secretary), M Pemberton (Membership Secretary), P Daymond (President). Committee Members: N Bedi, B Buckle, D John, C Mountain, , R Piper, V Silk, D Tebbutt and H Tizard. Co- opted Committee Member: B Upton. Also present MP Nick Hurd and Ward Councillors R Puddifoot, J Hensley, D Simmons, B Crowe and Inspector R Bryan of the Met Police. Plus over 130 Association Members. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE: M Beaumont (Patron), Mr & Mrs Raeder, Mr & Mrs Adams, Mr & Mrs Phillips and P Corthorne. The Chairman introduced the Committee members on the stage and thanked MP Nick Hurd and Councillors R Puddifoot, J Hensley and D Simmonds for showing their support for Ickenham and its residents. She also welcomed Inspector Rob Bryan (Metropolitan Police). MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING: The Minutes of the last AGM held on 11 April 2014 had been distributed with the last newsletter. Subject to the addition that at least 150 members were in attendance at that meeting, the minutes were approved. Proposed: B Cable; Seconded: P Cramp. Passed with no abstentions/objections. MATTERS ARISING: None. CHAIRMAN’S REPORT: Membership Our current membership stands at 3,259 households, an increase of 1.88% despite a reduction in life membership this year. The remaining life member households stand at 72. Our membership therefore stands at approximately 67% of Ickenham households. We continue our links with The Drive Association who also contribute subscriptions to our Association.
    [Show full text]