DOCSLIB.ORG

Searching for Dark Matter with PICO-40L Clarke Hardy on Behalf of the PICO Collaboration EPS-HEP 2019 Ghent, Belgium July 11, 2019 Overview of PICO

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Searching for Dark Matter with PICO-40L Clarke Hardy on Behalf of the PICO Collaboration EPS-HEP 2019 Ghent, Belgium July 11, 2019 Overview of PICO Searching for Dark Matter with PICO-40L Clarke Hardy on behalf of the PICO Collaboration EPS-HEP 2019 Ghent, Belgium July 11, 2019 Overview of PICO • Merger of PICASSO and COUPP collaborations in 2012 • Direct detection of dark matter using bubble chambers • Located at SNOLAB 2 km underground in Creighton Mine near Sudbury, Canada 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 2 Components of a PICO Detector Pressure vessel containing mineral Quartz jar oil/hydraulic fluid containing target fluid Cameras and Acoustic sensors LEDs to image capture signal from active volume bubble formation Temperature Bellows for control pressure control 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 3 Why BubbleBubble Chamber Physics Chambers? • Principle of operation • ExpandPut detector in metastable state and wait… under constant temperature to reach metastable superheated state • Energy deposition from nuclear recoils causes a phase transition Superheated Liquid 4 • SomeDan Baxter, APS April 2016 requirements for dark matter direct detection: 1. Target sensitive to WIMP interactions 2. Low background rates 3. Capability for particle discrimination 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 4 Target • Fluorocarbon targets for sensitivity to spin-dependent interactions on 19F due to unpaired proton Nucleus A Z Isotopic Fraction J 〈Sp〉 〈Sn〉 Xe 131 54 0.2129 3/2 -0.009 -0.227 Xe 129 54 0.264 1/2 0.028 0.359 I 127 53 1.0 5/2 0.309 0.075 Ge 73 32 0.0776 9/2 0.030 0.378 F 19 9 1.0 1/2 0.477 -0.004 • Variety of targets can be used 2 • CF3I for better SI sensitivity (scales with A ) • C3F8 for better SD sensitivity and electron recoil rejection • Variable energy threshold • Determined by setting temperature and pressure • Sensitive down to a few keV • Nucleation efficiency determined using calibration data 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 5 Detector Operation • Event cycle • Set temperature then expand to desired pressure for a particular threshold • Event trigger from bubble visible in cameras or after timeout • Record pressure, temperature, acoustic signal, images, etc. • Recompress and then expand for next cycle • Live fraction of >80% First start counting livetime Expansion 32 Compression 30 28 26 0 20 40 60 80 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 6 Backgrounds • Bubble nucleation mechanism differs between background particles • In general, two conditions for bubble nucleation: • Energy deposited must exceed threshold • Energy must be deposited within a critical radius • Seitz “heat-spike” model used to determine threshold for nuclear recoils 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 7 Nuclear Recoils • Radiogenic neutrons from detector components and surrounding rock • Veto multiple bubble events • Coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering (CEνNS) • Dominant background at proposed operating threshold • Cosmogenic muons • Highly suppressed at depth of SNOLAB (~0.29 μ/m2/day) Operating [1] threshold Target background rate 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 8 Electron Recoils from β and γ • Probability of nucleation from electron recoils in C3F8 given by exponential function of pressure and temperature Bf(P,t) = Ae− P • Seitz model • Probability per photon interaction with f (P, t)=QSeitz • New model [arXiv:1905.12522] Eion • Probability per energy deposited with f (P, t)= rl⇢l @ 4⇡ 4⇡ Q 4⇡r2 σ T + r3⇢ (h h ) r3 (P P ) Seitz ⇡ c − @T 3 c b b − l − 3 c b − l ✓ ◆ surface energy bulk energy reversible work @ 4⇡ E 4⇡r2 σ T + r3P ion ⇡ c − @T 3 c l ✓ ◆ work done by liquid reservoir 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 9 Electron Recoils from β and γ -5.4 PICO-0.1 UdeM -5.8 70 6.3585 PICO-0.1 FNAL 5.755 3.3413 -6.1 8.7722 5.1516 • PICO-0.1 MINOS 8.1688 2.7379 New model (right) provides much better fit 4.5482 7.5654 -6.5 PICO-2L Run 2 6.9619 3.9447 Gunter (UofC) 6.3585 -6.8 60 2.1344 to existing data than Seitz model (left)* 8.7722 5.755 3.3413 Drexel 5.1516 1.531 -7.2 8.1688 4.5482 7.5654 2.7379 6.9619 -7.5 3.9447 6.3585 -7.8 50 5.755 • Seitz threshold decreases faster with 5.1516 3.3413 2.1344 -8.2 4.5482 1.531 2.7379 -8.5 3.9447 decreasing pressure than stopping power 40 -8.9 0.92754 3.3413 2.1344 -9.2 (Probability/keV) 10 Pressure (psia) 2.7379 1.531 -9.6 using ionization threshold log 30 -9.9 2.1344 -10.3 0.92754 -10.6 1.531 • Lower pressure maximizes ER rejection for 20 -11.0 -11.3 a given Q 0.92754 -11.7 Seitz 1.531 10 -12.0 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 Temperature (°C) 10-2 PICO-0.1 UdeM PICO-0.1 FNAL PICO-0.1 MINOS -4 PICO-2L Run 2 10 Gunter (UofC) Drexel UofC C3F8 CYRTE 2013 10-6 CYRTE 2014 PICO-60 PICO-2L Run 3 10-8 10-10 Nucleation Probability (per interaction) 10-12 01234567 Seitz Threshold (keV) * Iodine-contaminated data (diamonds) require an additional nucleation mechanism to be fully described (see arXiv:1905.12522) 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 10 Alpha Discrimination • Alphas deposit energy over much longer range than nuclear recoils • Emitted acoustic power scales with surface area of initial energy deposition region where target liquid is vaporized [arXiv:1906.04172] • Construct parameter “AP” from integrated acoustic power over a frequency band • Acoustic signals blinded for WIMP- search run to set unbiased cut • Machine learning techniques developed as an alternative to simple AP cut (C. Amole et al., PRL 118, 251301 (2017)) [arXiv:1811.11308] neutrons alphas Observable bubble ~mm Fluorine nucleus (~50 keV) incident neutron ~50 nm ~50 μm ~50 nm Heavy daughter Helium nucleus (~5 MeV) Long radiating cylinder nucleus (~100 keV) 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 11 PICO-60 Detector • In operation from 2013-2017 • First run with CF3I for 3415 kg-days • Added two cameras and increased frame rate • Next run with C3F8 for 1167 kg-day at 3.3 keV, then 1404 kg-day at 2.45 keV • Water interface separates active region from stainless steel bellows • Background events observed around chamber walls and at water interface • Particulates from bellows falling into active volume causing background events 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 12 PICO-60 Results • World-leading limits on spin-dependent WIMP-proton cross section from first C3F8 run (C. Amole et al., PRL 118, 251301 (2017)) • Improved low-mass limits by including data from second C3F8 run at lower threshold (C. Amole et al., Phys. Rev. D 100, 022001 (2019)) • PICO-60 CF3I • PICO-2L • PICASSO • SIMPLE • XENON1T • PandaX-II PICO-60 C3F8 2017 PRL 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 13 PICO-60 → PICO-40L Bellows Active region Water buffer Inner jar “piston” Active region Bellows • New “right-side-up” design • Eliminate water buffer and use second quartz jar as a piston • Superheated upper region; cold lower region • Active mass increased slightly from 52 kg to 58.5 kg C3F8 • Larger pressure vessel to reduce backgrounds from stainless steel • Proof-of-concept for future ton-scale detector 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 14 PICO-40L Installation Progress • Commissioning expected to be completed this month • Physics data collection to begin in October 2019 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 15 Current PICO-40L Run Plan • Calibrations using 252Cf and 60Co prior to first physics run • WIMP search at Seitz threshold of 2.8 keV • Operate at 18 psia instead of 30 psia as in PICO-60 in accordance with new ER nucleation model PICO-60 PICASSO LUX XENON1T PandaX-II DarkSide-50 DEAP-3600 PICO-40L (projected) PICO-40L (projected) CDMSlite SuperCDMS SDn floor (Xe) SI floor (Xe) CRESST-III SDp floor (C F , no E) 3 8 SI floor (C3F8, no E) DAMIC-100 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 16 Next Steps: PICO-500 • ~260 L C3F8 with same “right-side-up” design as PICO-40L • Currently in design/procurement phase • Installation in SNOLAB cube hall to begin in 2020 • Sensitive to supernova neutrinos (T. Kozynets et al., Astroparticle Phys. 105 (2019) 25-30) 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 17 Conclusions • PICO-60 set world-leading limits on SDp cross section • PICO-40L uses a new design to reduce background sensitivity from PICO-60 and provide proof-of-concept for PICO-500 • Commissioning in SNOLAB nearly complete • First physics data expected in fall 2019 2019-07-11 Clarke Hardy 18 C.E. Dahl, M. Jin, J. Zhang S. Priya, Y. Yan R. Filgas, I. Stekl M. Ardid, M. Bou-Cabo, I. Felis M. Bressler, R. Neilson F. Flores, A. Gonzalez, E. Noriega-Benítez, I. Lawson E. Vázquez-Jáuregui P.S. Cooper, M. Crisler, W.H. Lippincott, A. Sonnenschein O. Harris S. Ali, M. Das, S. Sahoo B. Broerman, G. Cao, K. Clark, G. Giroux, C. Hardy, H. Herrera, C. Moore, A. Noble, T. Sullivan D. Baxter, J.I. Collar, J. Fuentes C. Coutu, N.A. Cruz-Venegas, S. Chen, M. Laurin, J.-P. Martin, A.E. Robinson, J. Farine, A. Le Blanc, T. Hillier, S. Fallows, T. Kozynets, K. Allen, E. Behnke, I. Arnquist , T. Grimes, N. Starinski, D. Tiwari, C. Licciardi, O. Scallon, C. Krauss, S. Pal, M.-C. Piro, I. Levine, B. Hackett, A. Hagen, V. Zacek, C. Wen Chao, U. Wichoski W. Woodley N. Walkowski, A. Weesner C.M. Jackson, K. Kadooka, B. Loer 2019-07-11 19 References [1] "4. Science Potential of a Deep Underground Laboratory." National Research Council. 2003. Neutrinos and Beyond: New Windows on Nature. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/10583 [2] arXiv:1905.12522 [3] arXiv:1906.04172 [4] C.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supersymmetry!
    The Cosmos … Time Space … and the LHC John ELLIS, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 300,000 Formation years of atoms 3 Formation minutes of nuclei Formation 1 micro- of protons second & neutrons Origin of dark matter? 1 pico- Appearance second of mass? Origin of Matter? A Strange Recipe for a Universe Ordinary Matter The ‘Concordance Model’ prompted by astrophysics & cosmology Open Cosmological Questions • Where did the matter come from? LHC? 1 proton for every 1,000,000,000 photons • What is the dark matter? LHC? Much more than the normal matter • What is the dark energy? LHC? Even more than the dark matter • Why is the Universe so big and old? LHC? Mechanism for cosmological inflation Need particle physics to answer these questions The Very Early Universe • Size: a zero • Age: t zero • Temperature: T large T ~ 1/a, t ~ 1/T2 • Energies: E ~ T • Rough magnitudes: T ~ 10,000,000,000 degrees E ~ 1 MeV ~ mass of electron t ~ 1 second Need particle physics to describe earlier history DarkDark MatterMatter in in the the Universe Universe Astronomers say thatAstronomers most of tellthe matterus that mostin the of the Universematter in theis invisibleuniverse is Darkinvisible Matter „Supersymmetric‟ particles ? WeWe shallwill look look for for it themwith thewith LHC the LHC Where does the Matter come from? Dirac predicted the existence of antimatter: same mass opposite internal properties: electric charge, … Discovered in cosmic rays Studied using accelerators Matter and antimatter not quite equal and opposite: WHY? 2008 Nobel Physics Prize: Kobayashi
    [Show full text]
  • Ultra-Weak Gravitational Field Theory Daniel Korenblum
    Ultra-weak gravitational field theory Daniel Korenblum To cite this version: Daniel Korenblum. Ultra-weak gravitational field theory. 2018. hal-01888978 HAL Id: hal-01888978 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01888978 Preprint submitted on 5 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ultra-weak gravitational field theory Daniel KORENBLUM [email protected] April 2018 Abstract The standard model of the Big Bang cosmology model ΛCDM 1 considers that more than 95 % of the matter of the Universe consists of particles and energy of unknown forms. It is likely that General Relativity (GR)2, which is not a quantum theory of gravitation, needs to be revised in order to free the cosmological model of dark matter and dark energy. The purpose of this document, whose approach is to hypothesize the existence of the graviton, is to enrich the GR to make it consistent with astronomical observations and the hypothesis of a fully baryonic Universe while maintaining the formalism at the origin of its success. The proposed new model is based on the quantum character of the gravitational field. This non-intrusive approach offers a privileged theoretical framework for probing the properties of the regime of ultra-weak gravitational fields in which the large structures of the Universe are im- mersed.
    [Show full text]
  • SNOWMASS21-CF1 CF0-079.Pdf 1.50MB 2020-08
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Multi-ton scale bubble chambers Topical Group(s): (check all that apply by copying/pasting ☐/☑) ​ ☑ (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like ☐ (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike ☐ (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes ☐ (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe ☐ (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before ☐ (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities ☐ (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics ☐ (Other) [Please specify frontier/topical group] ​ Contact Information: Alan Robinson (Université de Montréal) [[email protected]] ​ ​ Collaboration: PICO Collaboration Abstract: (maximum 200 words) Bubble chambers​ are outstanding instruments for dark matter searches with sensitivity to numerous dark matter-nucleon couplings while maintaining low inherent sensitivity to electron-recoils from background radiation. The PICO collaboration has pushed the forefront of spin-dependent sensitivity in operating several generations of ever larger bubble chambers. The first components of the ton-scale PICO-500 detector are currently under construction. PICO is interested in developing this inexpensive and reliable technology to allow 50t scale detectors that will exceed the sensitivity to spin-dependent dark-matter/nucleon couplings that other targets can attain due to neutrino backgrounds. Bubble chambers also promise excellent versatility by allowing for changes of target material to determine coupling parameters of a dark matter candidate. Our proposed white paper will explore the key figures of merit and modest advances in detector development required to construct a 50-ton bubble chamber to search for dark matter. SNOWMASS 2021 - CF1 LOI - Multi-ton scale bubble chambers 2 of 5 The PICO collaboration and the COUPP collaboration before it have developed bubble chambers into a sensitive and cost-effective method for building ton-scale dark matter detectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrinos and Cosmology
    Neutrinos and Cosmology 16th December 2019 NuPhys 2019, London Eleonora Di Valentino University of Manchester Introduction to cosmology The Universe originates from a hot Big Bang. The primordial plasma in thermodynamic equilibrium cools with the expansion of the Universe. It passes through the phase of recombination, where electrons and protons combine into hydrogen atoms, and decoupling, in which the Universe becomes transparent to the motion of photons. The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) is the radiation coming from the recombination, emitted about 13 billion years ago, just 400,000 years after the Big Bang. The CMB provides an unexcelled probe of the early Universe and today it is a black body a temperature T=2.726K. Introduction to CMB Planck 2018, Aghanim et al., arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] An important tool of research in cosmology is the angular power spectrum of CMB temperature anisotropies. 3 Introduction to CMB Theoretical model Cosmological parameters: 2 2 (Ωbh , Ωmh , h , ns , τ, Σmν ) DATA PARAMETER 4 CONSTRAINTS Introduction to CMB We can extract 4 independent angular spectra from the CMB: • Temperature • Cross Temperature Polarization type E • Polarization type E (density fluctuations) • Polarization type B (gravitational waves) Introduction to CMB From one side we have very accurate theoretical predictions on their angular power spectra while on the other side we have extremely precise measurements, culminated with the recent 2018 legacy release from the Planck satellite experiment. 6 Planck satellite experiment ● Frequency range of 30GHz to 857GHz; ● Orbit around L2; ● Composed by 2 instruments: ➔ LFI → 1.5 meters telescope; array of 22 differential receivers that measure the signal from the sky comparing with a black body at 4.5K.
    [Show full text]
  • PICO 250-Liter Bubble Chamber Dark Matter Experiment Michael B
    PICO 250-liter Bubble Chamber Dark Matter Experiment Michael B. Crisler Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory 21 August 2013 M.B. Crisler SNOLAB Future Projects Workshop 1 PICO Collaboration C. Amole, M. Besnier, G. Caria, A. Kamaha, A. Noble, T. Xie M. Ardid, M. Bou-Cabo D. Asner, J. Hall D. Baxter, C.E. Dahl, M. Jin E. Behnke, H. Borsodi, C. Harnish, O. Harris, C. Holdeman, I. Levine, E. Mann, J. Wells P. Bhattacharjee, M. Das, S.J. Brice, D. Broemmelsiek, J.I. Collar, R. Neilson, S. Seth P.S. Cooper, M. Crisler, A.E. Robinson W.H. Lippincott, E. Ramberg, F. Debris, M. Fines-Neuschild, C.M. Jackson, M.K. Ruschman, M. Lafrenière, M. Laurin, L. Lessard, A. Sonnenschein J.-P. Martin, M.-C. Piro, A. Plante, O. Scallon, N. Dhungana, J. Farine, N. Starinski, V. Zacek R. Podviyanuk, U. Wichoski R. Filgas, S. Gagnebin, C. Krauss, S. Pospisil, I. Stekl D. Marlisov, P. Mitra I. Lawson, E. Vázquez Jáuregui D. Maurya, S. Priya PICASSO + COUPP = PICO New collaboration is PICO PICASSO Ongoing efforts with Superheated Droplet Detectors Committed to Geyser Chamber R&D through FY13 COUPP Ongoing efforts with COUPP-60 bubble chamber Committed to Fast-Compression Bubble Chamber R&D through FY13 M.B. Crisler SNOLAB Future Projects 21 August 2013 Workshop 3 PICASSO + COUPP = PICO PICASSO focus on spin-dependent couplings Fluorine based fluids – C4F10 COUPP focus on simultaneous SI & SD couplings Fluorine and iodine - CF3I First Collaborative PICO Effort = PICO-2L: 2-liter C3F8 chamber at former COUPP-2L site Spin-dependent couplings + low mass SI M.B.
    [Show full text]
  • 27. Dark Matter
    1 27. Dark Matter 27. Dark Matter Written August 2019 by L. Baudis (Zurich U.) and S. Profumo (UC Santa Cruz). 27.1 The case for dark matter Modern cosmological models invariably include an electromagnetically close-to-neutral, non- baryonic matter species with negligible velocity from the standpoint of structure formation, gener- ically referred to as “cold dark matter” (CDM; see The Big-Bang Cosmology—Sec. 22 of this Re- view). For the benchmark ΛCDM cosmology adopted in the Cosmological Parameters—Sec. 25.1 of this Review, the DM accounts for 26.4% of the critical density in the universe, or 84.4% of the total matter density. The nature of only a small fraction, between at least 0.5% (given neutrino os- cillations) and at most 1.6% (from combined cosmological constraints), of the non-baryonic matter content of the universe is known: the three Standard Model neutrinos (see the Neutrino Masses, Mixing, and Oscillations—Sec. 14 of this Review) ). The fundamental makeup of the large majority of the DM is, as of yet, unknown. Assuming the validity of General Relativity, DM is observed to be ubiquitous in gravitation- ally collapsed structures of size ranging from the smallest known galaxies [1] to galaxies of size comparable to the Milky Way [2], to groups and clusters of galaxies [3]. The mass-to-light ratio is observed to saturate at the largest collapsed scales to a value indicative, and close to, what inferred from other cosmological observations for the universe as a whole [4]. In such collapsed structures, the existence of DM is inferred directly using tracers of mass enclosed within a certain radius such as stellar velocity dispersion, rotation curves in axisymmetric systems, the virial theorem, gravitational lensing, and measures of the amount of non-dark, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetry
    Supersymmetry Patrick Mullenders ➔ Why supersymmetry? Index ◆ Particle masses ◆ Cosmological observations ● Dark matter ● Baryon antisymmetry ➔ Why supersymmetry? ◆ What is supersymmetry? ◆ Models ● MSSM ● NMSSM ➔ Detection 2 Why supersymmetry? The standard model is incomplete: Hierarchy problem ➔ 'Natural' mass = Planck mass ➔ Particle mass ≲ (Planck mass)⋅10-16 ➔ SUSY: broken symmetry at scale MSUSY ≈ #(TeV) Image: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/05/15/the-rise-and-fall-of-supersymmetry/ 3 © New Scientist Why supersymmetry? The standard model is incomplete: Cosmology ➔ Dark Matter ◆ Neutrinos are HDM candidates ◆ Need CDM to explain clumping ➔ Prominent CDM candidates ◆ Within the SM framework ● MACHOS ● Primordial BHs ◆ Beyond the SM ● Axions ← strong CP problem ● WIMPS ← Supersymmetric models Image: https://wccftech.com/dark-matter-continues-evade-worlds-sensitive-scanner-fails-detect-dark 4 -particles/ Why supersymmetry? ➔ WIMPS ◆ SUSY particle ! ◆ Early universe: equil. !! qq̅ (or ff)̅ ◆ Cooling: !! → qq̅ ◆ Freeze out: !! ↮ qq̅ ➔ Supposing the lightest SUSY particle is stable (→ R-parity) ◆ Left over !lightest particles could be CDM 5 Why supersymmetry? The standard model is incomplete: Cosmology ➔ Baryonic asymmetry ◆ Baryonic matter ≫ Antibaryonic matter ➔ Supersymmetric theories can account for this by introducing massive bosons, such as ◆ Georgi-Glashow models (X & Y bosons) + + X → uLuR , X → e LdR̅ , X → e RdL̅ + Y → e LuR̅ , Y → dLuR , Y → dL̅ e,R̅ Image: (20100201 ut)r-parity and-cosmological_constraints 6 ➔ Standard Model: Why supersymmetry? ◆ Unified electroweak interaction ◆ Strong interaction ◆ Couplings seem to miss by a factor ~102 ➔ Supersymmetric theories: ◆ (Much better) predicted unification of all three SM forces ◆ The SUSY particles cause for changes in the running of the coupling constants w.r.t. energy Image: http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2013/05/15/the-rise-and-fall-of-supersymmetry/ 7 CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Supersymmetric Particle Searches
    Citation: M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018) and 2019 update Supersymmetric Particle Searches m m The exclusion of particle masses within a mass range ( 1, 2) m −m will be denoted with the notation “none 1 2” in the VALUE column of the following Listings. The latest unpublished results are described in the “Supersymmetry: Experiment” review. See the related review(s): Supersymmetry, Part I (Theory) Supersymmetry, Part II (Experiment) CONTENTS: χ0 (Lightest Neutralino) mass limit e1 Accelerator limits for stable χ0 − e1 Bounds on χ0 from dark matter searches − e1 χ0-p elastic cross section − 1 eSpin-dependent interactions Spin-independent interactions Other bounds on χ0 from astrophysics and cosmology − e1 Unstable χ0 (Lightest Neutralino) mass limit − e1 χ0, χ0, χ0 (Neutralinos) mass limits e2 e3 e4 χ±, χ± (Charginos) mass limits e1 e2 Long-lived χ± (Chargino) mass limit ν (Sneutrino)e mass limit Chargede sleptons R-parity conserving e (Selectron) mass limit − R-partiy violating e e(Selectron) mass limit − R-parity conservinge µ (Smuon) mass limit − R-parity violating µ e(Smuon) mass limit − R-parity conservinge τ (Stau) mass limit − R-parity violating τ e(Stau) mass limit − Long-lived ℓ (Slepton)e mass limit − e q (Squark) mass limit e R-parity conserving q (Squark) mass limit − R-parity violating q e(Squark) mass limit − Long-lived q (Squark) masse limit b (Sbottom)e mass limit e R-parity conserving b (Sbottom) mass limit − e R-parity violating b (Sbottom) mass limit − e t (Stop) mass limit e R-parity conserving t (Stop) mass limit − R-parity violating t (Stop)e mass limit − Heavy g (Gluino) mass limite R-paritye conserving heavy g (Gluino) mass limit − R-parity violating heavy g e(Gluino) mass limit − Long-lived g (Gluino) mass limite Light G (Gravitino)e mass limits from collider experiments e Supersymmetry miscellaneous results HTTP://PDG.LBL.GOV Page 1 Created: 8/2/2019 16:43 Citation: M.
    [Show full text]
  • How Zwicky Already Ruled out Modified Gravity Theories Without Dark Matter
    How Zwicky already ruled out modified gravity theories without dark matter Theodorus Maria Nieuwenhuizen1,2 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1090 GL Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2International Institute of Physics, UFRG, Lagoa Nova, Natal - RN, 59064-741, Brazil Various theories, such as MOND, MOG, Emergent Gravity and f(R) theories avoid dark matter by assuming a change in General Relativity and/or in Newton’s law. Galactic rotation curves are typically described well. Here the application to galaxy clusters is considered, focussed on the good lensing and X-ray data for A1689. As a start, the no-dark-matter case is confirmed to work badly: the need for dark matter starts near the cluster centre, where Newton’s law is still supposed to be valid. This leads to the conundrum discovered by Zwicky, which is likely only solvable in his way, namely by assuming additional (dark) matter. Neutrinos with eV masses serve well without altering the successes in (dwarf) galaxies. Keywords: MOND, MOG, f(R), Emergent Gravity, galaxy cluster, Abell 1689, dark matter, neutrinos I. INTRODUCTION Niets is gewichtiger dan donkere materie52 Dark matter enters the light in 1922 when Jacobus Kapteyn employs this term in his First Attempt at a Theory of the Arrangement and Motion of the Sidereal System1. It took a decade for his student Jan Oort to work out the stellar motion perpendicular to the Galactic plane, and to conclude that invisible mass should exist to keep the stars bound to the plane2. Next year, in 1933, Fritz Zwicky applied the idea to the Coma galaxy cluster and concluded that it is held together by dark matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Pos(NOW2018)099
    Particle Physics in the Cosmos: Session Summary PoS(NOW2018)099 Basudeb Dasgupta Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India E-mail: [email protected] Karoline Schaeffner GSSI - Gran Sasso Science Institute, L’Aquila, 67100, Italy E-mail: [email protected] This manuscript presents a summary of the parallel session V "Particles in the Cosmos" of the Neutrino Oscillation Workshop – NOW 2018. The topics covered by the session are a combina- tion of new theoretical approaches and ideas and a selection of recent experimental results and upcoming projects. Neutrino Oscillation Workshop (NOW2018) 9 - 16 September, 2018 Rosa Marina (Ostuni, Brindisi, Italy) c Copyright owned by the author(s) under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). https://pos.sissa.it/ Particle Physics in the Cosmos 1. Introduction Session V was devoted to the role of “Particle Physics in the Cosmos.” In the following we will give a brief summary of the contributions to this session of the NOW 2018 workshop. The topics cover, on the one hand, theories explaining the baryon asymmetry, physics beyond the Standard Model of Cosmology, and theoretical frameworks for new dark matter candidates, to on the other hand, a selection of latest results from WIMP and WIMP-like dark matter searches and a new experimental approach in the recently very active field of coherent elastic neutrino-nucleus scattering. PoS(NOW2018)099 2. Theorists’ Perspective 2.1 Explaining the Baryon Asymmetry The generation of the dark matter relic density and the baryon asymmetry of the Universe are among the major puzzles of modern physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Jhep05(2020)081
    Published for SISSA by Springer Received: November 1, 2019 Revised: March 18, 2020 Accepted: April 25, 2020 Published: May 18, 2020 Searching for dark photon dark matter with cosmic JHEP05(2020)081 ray antideuterons Lisa Randall and Weishuang Linda Xu Department of Physics, Harvard University, 17 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Low energy antideuteron detection presents a unique channel for indirect de- tection, targeting dark matter that annihilates into hadrons in a relatively background-free way. Since the idea was first proposed, many WIMP-type models have already been disfa- vored by direct detection experiments, and current constraints indicate that any thermal relic candidates likely annihilate through some hidden sector process. In this paper, we show that cosmic ray antideuteron detection experiments represent one of the best ways to search for hidden sector thermal relic dark matter, and in particular investigate a vector portal dark matter that annihilates via a massive dark photon. We find that the parameter space with thermal relic annihilation and mχ > mA0 & 20 GeV is largely unconstrained, and near future antideuteron experiment GAPS will be able to probe models in this space with mχ ≈ mA0 up to masses of O(100 GeV). Specifically the dark matter models favored by the Fermi Galactic center excess is expected to be detected or constrained at the 5(3)−σ level assuming a optimistic (conservative) propagation model. Keywords: Beyond Standard Model, Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM ArXiv ePrint: 1910.14669 Open Access, c The Authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Pico-Charged Intermediate Particles Rescue Dark Matter Interpretation of 511 Kev Line Yasaman Farzan IPM, Tehran
    Pico-charged intermediate particles rescue dark matter interpretation of 511 keV line Yasaman Farzan IPM, Tehran 1 Situation today From CMS and AT L A S : Higgs discovery but nothing more Some news from LHCB Neutrino physics: Overall picture is consistent with 3 ⇥ 3 oscillation paradigm Dark matter 2 3 XENON collaboration, 1705.06655 Competitive result4 from PANDAXII, 1708.06917 5 Why simplest dark paradigm should be true? 6 SM as clue SM sector is sophisticated and non-trivial with a very rich phenomenology 7 Indirect dark matter searches Searching for stable product from dark matter annihilation or decay such as photons positrons antiproton antihydrogen neutrinos …. 8 Indirect dark matter searches 9 Hints for DM from indirect search Signals that went away with further data: 130 GeV line observed by Fermi-LAT Signals that stay robust but go “out of fashion”: PAMELA Signal, INTEGRAL 511 keV line 10 PAMELA and AMS02 positron excess 11 511 keV It has been observed for more than 40 years Leventhal et al., 1978 + e−e annihilation 12 INTEGRAL INTErnational Gamma-Ray Astrophysics Laboratory Launched in 2002 SPI at INTEGRAL of ESA Angular resolution: 2◦ Energy resolution: 2 keV 13 Spectrum 58σ C.L. Va’vra, 1304.0833 14 Morphology of the line Distribution of the line as observed by INTEGRAL/SPI: ESA/Bouchet et al. 15 Flux Siegert et al., arXiv:1512.00325 3 2 1 (0.96 0.07) 10− ph cm− sec− ± ⇥ 16 Some alternative scenarios Radioactive decay: 56Ni 44Ti 13N 26Al Accreting binary sources pulsars supermassive blackhole 17 Dark matter explanation C Boehm, D Hooper, Silk, Casse and Paul, Phys.
    [Show full text]