DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Document Pack

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Document Pack Public Document Pack Meeting Planning and Environment Scrutiny Committee Date/Time Thursday 24 January 2002 at 2:00 pm Location Sparkenhoe Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield Officer to contact Ms. J. Bailey (Tel: 0116 265 6225) E-Mail [email protected] Membership Mr. D. R. Bown CC (Chairman) Mr. D. C. Bill CC Mr. P. D. Boult TD, CC Mrs. C. E. Brock CC Mr. B. Chapman AE, CC Mr. R. Fraser CC Mr. A. M. Kershaw CC Mr. O. D. Lucas CC Mr. C. H. G. MacLeod CC Mr. S. H. Preston CC Lt. Col. P. A. Roffey DL, CC AGENDA Item Report by Marked 1. Minutes of the meeting held on 20 December, 2001. A 2. Questions asked by electors under Standing Order 35. 3. Questions asked by Members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). 4. Any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent elsewhere on the agenda. 5. Declarations of pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests in respect of items on this agenda. 6. Declarations of the Party Whip in accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. 7. Presentation of Petitions under Standing Order 36. B To consider the following petition: Petition presented by Mr. E.F. White CC, signed by _______C O U N T Y H A L L • G L E N F I E L D • L E I C E S T E R • L E 3 8 R A_____ T E L E P H O N E: 0116 232 3232 • F A X: 0116 265 6260 • M I N I C O M: 0116 265 6160 e.mail: [email protected] 2 413 local residents concerning the Earl Shilton bypass – the terms detailed in the paper marked ‘B’ on the agenda. Reports back on petitions presented previously. 8. Petition: Burton on the Wolds, Melton Road: Objection to Acting Director of C zebra pedestrian crossing proposal. Planning and Transportation Referrals from the Cabinet. 9. Revised Estimate 2000/01 and Revenue Budget 2002/03. County Treasurer D and Acting Director of Planning and Transportation 10. Capital Programme 2002/03 to 2004/05. County Treasurer E and Acting Director of Planning and Transportation Other Items 11. Multi Modal Study: M1 Corridor - Consultation Report on F Draft Preferred Package Document Pack Page 1 Agenda Item 1 Minutes of a meeting of the Planning and Environment Scrutiny Committee held at County Hall, Glenfield on Thursday 20 December 2001. PRESENT Mr. D. R. Bown CC (Chairman) Mr. D. C. Bill CC Mr. P. D. Boult TD, CC Mr. A. M. Kershaw CC Mr. O. D. Lucas CC Mr. C. H. G. MacLeod CC Mr. G. H. Perkins JP, CC Mrs. A. C. M. Pullen CC Mr. J. B. Rhodes CC Lt. Col. P. A. Roffey DL, CC Also in attendance Mr. S.J. Galton CC (for minute 72) Mr. C. Rayner - Director of Operations, Leicester City Football Club (for minute 76). 66. Minutes of the meeting held on 29 October 2001. The minutes of the Planning and Environment Scrutiny Committee held on 29 October 2001 were taken as read, confirmed and signed. 67. Questions asked by electors under Standing Order 35. The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been asked under Standing Order 35. 68. Questions asked by Members under Standing Order 7(3) and 7(5). The Chief Executive reported that no questions had been asked under Standing Orders 7(3) and 7(5). 69. Any other items which the Chairman has decided to take as urgent elsewhere on the agenda. There were no urgent items for consideration. Document Pack Page 2 70. Declarations of pecuniary and non-pecuniary interests in respect of items on the agenda. The Chairman invited members who wished to do so to declare any pecuniary or non-pecuniary interest in respect of items on the agenda for the meeting. No declarations were made. 71. Declarations of the Party Whip in accordance with Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. There were no declarations made under Overview and Scrutiny Procedure Rule 16. 72. Presentation of Petitions under Standing Order 36: Tilton on the Hill, School Playing Field Mr. A. Woods, a member of the public, presented a petition, signed by 204 local residents, in the following terms:- “To keep our school playing field at Tilton on the Hill as a playing field and to keep the old school building as a community centre.” Mr. Woods spoke about the background to the petition, and explained that there was widespread support in the village to retain the existing playing field. Mr. S.J. Galton CC, the local member, said that whilst he was aware that negotiations were ongoing concerning an alternative recreation site, it should be noted that people wished to keep the existing facility. (The Committee noted that disposal of the school building was a separate issue, not being in the County Council’s ownership). The Committee was advised that as a result of the Cabinet decision on 28 August an alternative playing field site had been proposed, and was under investigation. Should the County Council wish to dispose of the existing playing field consent might be required from both the DfES and DLTR. In the meantime arrangements for the continued use of the playing field by the village would continue. RESOLVED: (a) That the Director of Property and the Acting Director of Planning and Transportation be asked to report to a future meeting of the Committee on the matter, in accordance with Standing Order 36(5); and (b) That the petitioners be informed accordingly. Document Pack Page 3 73. Petition: Bottesford, Grantham Road - requesting measures to reduce traffic speeds. The Committee considered a report of the Acting Director of Planning and Transportation on the outcome of investigations into a petition presented to the Committee on 30 August 2001. A copy of the report, marked ‘A’, is filed with these minutes. Mrs. C. Bird, a local resident, and Mr. J.B. Rhodes CC, the local member, both spoke on the need for traffic calming measures. Mr. Rhodes said that he was satisfied with the proposals, and noted that the ability to enforce speed restrictions was a prime consideration. RESOLVED: (a) That it be noted that a 40mph speed limit could be extended to cover the housing development adjacent to Grantham Road; (b) That it be noted that a further extension of a 40mph speed limit between the area of housing and the junction with the A52 on Grantham Road would not be in keeping with national guidelines and was unlikely to be enforceable; (c) That it be noted that traffic signs and lining measures (such as the triangular ‘teeth’ markings) could be introduced to encourage a reduction in vehicle speeds; (d) That it be noted that any new measures would be monitored to ascertain the impact on traffic speeds and accident rates; and (e) That the petitioners be informed accordingly. 74. Petition: A607 Croxton Kerrial - to implement 30 mph speed restrictions. The Committee considered a report of the Acting Director of Planning and Transportation on the outcome of investigations into a petition presented to the Committee on 5 April 2001. A copy of the report, marked ‘B’, is filed with these minutes. Mr. J.B. Rhodes CC, the local member, expressed his support for the proposals. The Acting Director confirmed that when the schedule of traffic calming works for the next financial year had been finalised it would be circulated to all councillors as a Members’ Information item. RESOLVED: (a) That it be noted that the existing traffic calming scheme on A607 could be upgraded by introducing a physical traffic calming scheme, together with reductions in the existing 40mph speed limit to 30mph in the village; (b) That it be noted that until details of a physical traffic calming scheme were finalised and included in the programme it would not be Document Pack Page 4 appropriate to begin reducing speed limits, as that alone would not achieve any significant speed reductions; (c) That it be noted that the scheme was currently on the reserve list of works for the next financial year; (d) That the petitioners be informed accordingly; and (e) That it be noted that changes in national policy and funding might facilitate installation of speed cameras in the future, and therefore that a report on speed cameras, in conjunction with or as an alternative to other traffic calming measures, should be the subject of a further report to the Committee. 75. Survey: B582 Victoria Road, Whetstone - to implement right turn bans. The Committee considered a report of the Acting Director of Planning and Transportation on the outcome of investigations requested by the Committee in August 2001 into a survey asking for right turn bans on the B582 junction. A copy of the report, marked, ‘C’ is filed with these minutes. Two letters from local traders concerning traffic calming (received on 19 December) were circulated to members of the committee, and copies are filed with the minutes. Mrs. Skeemer, a member of the public, spoke on behalf of local residents attending the meeting. She said that traffic calming throughout the village was needed, and that vehicle speeds tended to be slower in the centre, but was happy with the proposals and hoped they would be implemented at the earliest opportunity. Mrs. A.C.M. Pullen CC, the local member, also expressed support for the proposals. The Acting Director said that the style and details of the traffic calming measures would be developed in consultation with the local community. RESOLVED: (a) That the objections to proposed right-turn bans from Enderby Road which had been submitted by local councils and by the Chief Constable (who was responsible for enforcing restrictions) be noted; (b) That it be noted that a right turn ban into Enderby Road would be unlikely to significantly alter the situation (concerns about vehicle speeds would remain), and would also have a detrimental effect on buses, in that it would cut off the village
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Railfuture Response to National Infrastructure
    RAILFUTURE RESPONSE TO NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE COMMISSION RAIL NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR THE MIDLANDS AND THE NORTH – CALL FOR EVIDENCE FOLLOWING INTERIM REPORT Contribution from Railfuture East Midlands Branch – August 2020 National Infrastructure Commission | Rail Needs Assessment for the Midlands and the North - Interim report https://www.nic.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/RNA-Interim-Report-Final.pdf Introduction: The Railfuture response dated 29th May 2020 to the first round of this consultation https://www.railfuture.org.uk/display2324 placed considerable emphasis on freight. In contributing to the August call for evidence, we in East Midlands Branch: Re-submit our May 2020 Rf EM Branch submission for previous NIC RNA call for evidence. This is on pp6-15 below in red text with a few subsequent additions in blue. Attempt to answer the NIC’s broad questions Q1 to Q4 below. References are to the pages and tables in the NIC’s Interim Report (see header.) Prepared by: Steve Jones, Branch Secretary, Railfuture East Midlands Branch [email protected] including contributions from members of EM Branch. Question 1: Please provide specific sources for evidence that the Commission could use in estimating costs and the impact of proposals on journey time and capacity. For schemes already proposed other than by Railfuture, such as those listed on p36, much information is already available from Network Rail, SNTBs (TfN, Midlands Connect), local and combined authorities, TOCs, DfT. Campaign organisations. For additional schemes put forward by Railfuture, further work would need to be done, though campaign groups such as SENRUG, SELRAP, MEMRAP and CRIL may have initial estimates for specific lines or areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Timetable Planning Rules
    TIMETABLE PLANNING RULES East Midlands 2020 TIMETABLE VERSION 2.0 Issued by Amy Forte Timetable Production Manager The Quadrant:MK Elder Gate Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK9 1EN Tel: 07801 334042 Final Proposal for Principal Change Timetable 2020 8th February 2019 NETWORK RAIL Timetable Planning Rules Version: 2.0 East Midlands Final Proposal for Principal Change Date: 8 February 2019 Timetable 2020 Page: 2 of 113 Contents Section Page no. Section Page no. 4.6 Engineers’ Trains Restrictions ........................ 32 1 Introduction and General Notes ............... 3 5 Running Times, Margins and Allowances 33 1.1 Index of Routes ................................................ 4 1.2 Sectional Appendices and Rule Book .............. 5 5.1 Sectional Running Times ................................ 33 1.2.1 Sectional Appendix .................................... 5 5.1.1 Source of Current SRTs .......................... 33 1.2.2 Rule Book .................................................. 5 5.1.2 Method of Calculation .............................. 33 1.3 Definitions......................................................... 7 5.1.3 New and Revised Sectional Running Times34 1.3.1 Train Classification .................................... 7 5.1.4 Timing of Trains Conveying Passengers on Goods Lines ....................................................... 34 1.3.2 Days of Operation ................................... 11 5.2 Headways ....................................................... 35 1.3.3 Traction and Rolling Stock .....................
    [Show full text]
  • LNW Route Specification 2017
    Delivering a better railway for a better Britain Route Specifications 2017 London North Western London North Western July 2017 Network Rail – Route Specifications: London North Western 02 SRS H.44 Roses Line and Branches (including Preston 85 Route H: Cross-Pennine, Yorkshire & Humber and - Ormskirk and Blackburn - Hellifield North West (North West section) SRS H.45 Chester/Ellesmere Port - Warrington Bank Quay 89 SRS H.05 North Transpennine: Leeds - Guide Bridge 4 SRS H.46 Blackpool South Branch 92 SRS H.10 Manchester Victoria - Mirfield (via Rochdale)/ 8 SRS H.98/H.99 Freight Trunk/Other Freight Routes 95 SRS N.07 Weaver Junction to Liverpool South Parkway 196 Stalybridge Route M: West Midlands and Chilterns SRS N.08 Norton Bridge/Colwich Junction to Cheadle 199 SRS H.17 South Transpennine: Dore - Hazel Grove 12 Hulme Route Map 106 SRS H.22 Manchester Piccadilly - Crewe 16 SRS N.09 Crewe to Kidsgrove 204 M1 and M12 London Marylebone to Birmingham Snow Hill 107 SRS H.23 Manchester Piccadilly - Deansgate 19 SRS N.10 Watford Junction to St Albans Abbey 207 M2, M3 and M4 Aylesbury lines 111 SRS H.24 Deansgate - Liverpool South Parkway 22 SRS N.11 Euston to Watford Junction (DC Lines) 210 M5 Rugby to Birmingham New Street 115 SRS H.25 Liverpool Lime Street - Liverpool South Parkway 25 SRS N.12 Bletchley to Bedford 214 M6 and M7 Stafford and Wolverhampton 119 SRS H.26 North Transpennine: Manchester Piccadilly - 28 SRS N.13 Crewe to Chester 218 M8, M9, M19 and M21 Cross City Souh lines 123 Guide Bridge SRS N.99 Freight lines 221 M10 ad M22
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Route Study March 2016 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – East Midlands Route Study 02
    Long Term Planning Process East Midlands Route Study March 2016 Foreword March 2016 Network Rail – East Midlands Route Study 02 We are delighted to present the East Midlands Route Study, a The work carried out within this Route Study enables us to identify document which sets out the building blocks of our strategic vision any gaps between the planned capability of the network in 2023, for delivering rail growth throughout the East Midlands over the and the capability required to meet forecast growth for passenger next 30 years. and freight demand. By also looking ahead over the longer term to 2043, we can build our understanding of capacity needs in the The East Midlands route serves many different rail markets, long future, making plans to deliver those in the most efficient manner. distance and commuting services operate regularly into London St Pancras International. Strong links between urban centres, such as Network Rail has led the development of the East Midlands Route Nottingham, Leicester and Derby, help people travel for work, Study which was published as a Draft for Consultation in January education and leisure. Being located at the heart of Britain’s rail 2015, and was open for consultation until April 2015. The study has network means the Route forms a key part of major cross country been developed using a collaborative approach with input from the and freight journeys. rail industry, local authorities, users and developers from the freight industry, the Department for Transport and Rail Delivery Group. Over recent years, the rail industry has seen consistent growth in demand and this is forecast to continue.
    [Show full text]
  • Doningtonno Rock Festival in the UK Is Held in Such Affection by Fans and Bands Alike As Castle Donington Monsters of Rock
    FEATURE UNCOVERED DONINGTONNo rock festival in the UK is held in such affection by fans and bands alike as Castle Donington Monsters Of Rock. Not only did it define the ’80s metal scene, but it also created an environment where rock fans could be loud, proud, and more often than not incredibly muddy! John Nicholson brings you a heartfelt appreciation of why - A CELEBRATION Donington was so very special… “We parked up and walked over the hill and looked down into the bowl for the first time. There, spread out before us, were thousands and thousands of rock fans from all over the country. And the great thing was, they all looked just like us! It was such a great spirit.” Andy Copping, Live Nation executive president of UK touring WHEN PROMOTERS PAUL LOASBY and Maurice BACK IN the late ’70s there simply was no festival heavy rock was mutating into heavy metal, and when Loasby and Jones set a date for the inaugural Monsters Jones of Midland Concert Promotions (MCP) sat down dedicated to rock and metal in the UK. Yes, you could NWOBHM acts were pulling the music into a new decade of Rock – 16 August 1980. Tickets cost £7.50. Some together in a pub somewhere in the East Midlands in go to Knebworth to see the likes of Led Zeppelin. But with a speedier, more aggressive, reinvented brand of estimates put the attendance at 35,000, others at nearer 1979 and discussed the idea of putting on a one-day you’d have to sit through Chas and Dave, Fairport bludgeon riffola.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester and Leicestershire Rail Strategy
    Leicester and Leicestershire Rail Strategy March 2016 www.slcrail.com 1 | P a g e Leicester and Leicestershire Rail Strategy CONTENTS Executive Summary 1. The Commission 2. Context 2.1 The Political Context 2.2 The Rail Industry Context 2.3 Leicester and Leicestershire Strategic Economic Plan 3. The Industry Planning Process 3.1 The Long Term Plan 3.2 Indicative Train Service Specifications 4 Methodology 4.1 General Principles 4.2 Gross Value Added (GVA) Modelling 5. Leicestershire’s Rail Network 5.1 The Current Network 5.2 Passenger Services 5.3 Freight Services 5.4 Network Capacity 6. Planned Enhancements 6.1 Midland Main Line 6.2 East Midlands Gateway Strategic Freight Interchange 6.3 East West Rail 6.4 High Speed 2 7. GVA Study Results 8. Leicester to London 8.1 Enhanced Conventional Services 8.2 The Effects of HS2 on Leicester – London services 9. Train Service Options 9.1 To Leeds and North East England via HS2 9.2 To Swindon and Bristol 9.3 To the Thames Valley 9.4 To Manchester 9.5 To Leeds and North East England via the Conventional Network 9.6 To the Sussex Coast and/or Sevenoaks 9.7 To Norwich 9.8 To Burton-upon-Trent 10. “Making it Happen” 7.1 Next Steps 7.2 Opportunities to Influence Appendix A. Summary of Train Service Options Appendix B. Assessment of Economic Impact of Rail Service Options (separate supporting report incorporating the detailed GVA analysis.) 2 | P a g e Leicester and Leicestershire Rail Strategy EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Commission SLC Rail was commissioned in May 2015 to prepare a rail strategy for Leicester and Leicestershire.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Trains Refranchise Report
    REMAPPING OF THE CENTRAL TRAINS FRANCHISE PASSENGER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DELIVERY OF RAIL SERVICES IN THE EAST MIDLANDS TRAVELWATCH East Midlands MAY 2006 TRAVELWATCH EAST MIDLANDS REMAPPING OF THE CENTRAL TRAINS FRANCHISE CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 3. SEEKING THE PASSENGER VIEW 3.1 THE PASSENGER SURVEY 3.1.1 Methodology 3.1.2. Results from ‘top 10 priorities’ question 3.1.2.1 Results from the East Midlands Survey 3.1.2.2 Comparison of results: East Midlands and West Midlands surveys 3.1.2.3 Comparison of results East midlands and National surveys 3.1.2.4 Conclusions from comparing survey results 3.1.3. Results from ‘paired choice’ question 3.1.4. Other comments 3.2. WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS 3.3. DISCUSSIONS WITH STAKEHOLDERS 4. THE TRAVEL MARKET 4.1 INTER-CITY TO LONDON 4.2 INTER-URBAN AND REGIONAL 4.3 LOCAL-SUBURBAN 4.4. LOCAL-RURAL Page 2 TRAVELWATCH EAST MIDLANDS REMAPPING OF THE CENTRAL TRAINS FRANCHISE 4.5 INTER-REGIONAL 5. ROUTE SPECIFIC ISSUES 5.1 ROUTES ALLOCATED TO THE EAST MIDLANDS FRANCHISE 5.1.1 St Pancras – Derby / Nottingham / Sheffield / Leeds 5.1.2 Liverpool – Nottingham – Norwich 5.1.3 Matlock – Derby 5.1.4 Crewe – Skegness 5.1.5 Leicester – Loughborough – Lincoln 5.1.6 Worksop – Nottingham 5.1.7 Cleethorpes – Lincoln – Newark / Nottingham 5.1.8 Doncaster – Lincoln – Peterborough 5. 2 ROUTES ALLOCATED TO THE WEST MIDLANDS FRANCHISE 5.2.1 Birmingham –Leicester 5.2.2 Euston – Northampton 5.2.3 Birmingham – Coventry / Northampton 5.2.4 Coventry – Nuneaton 5.3 ROUTES ALLOCATED TO THE CROSS COUNTRY FRANCHISE 5.3.1 Cardiff / Hereford – Nottingham 5.3.2 Birmingham – Stansted Airport 5.3.3 Birmingham-Derby-Sheffield (existing Cross Country route) 5.4 OTHER ASPIRATIONS 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Document Pack
    Public Document Pack Meeting Cabinet Date/Time Tuesday 22 January 2002 at 2:30 pm Location Goscote Committee Room, County Hall, Glenfield Officer to contact Miss P.B. Ewen - (0116 265 6036) E-Mail [email protected]. Membership Mr. H. Barber CC (Chairman) Mr. R. Mason CC Mr. R. Miller CC Mr. I. D. Ould CC Mr. D. R. Parsons CC Mrs. L. A. S. Pendleton CC Prof. M. E. Preston CC Mr. E. F. White CC Mr. P. G. Winkless CC AGENDA Item Report by Marked 1. To Advise of Any Other Items which the Chairman has Decided to take as Urgent on the Agenda 2. Declarations of Pecuniary and Non-Pecuniary Interest in Respect of Items on the Agenda 3. Quality Protects Management Action Plan Director of Social A Services 4. Learning Disability Joint Investment Plan Update Director of Social B 2002/03 Services 5. Education Development Plan 2002-2007 Director of Education C 6. Early Years Development and Childcare Director of Education D Implementation Plan 2002/2003 7. Changes to the Procedure for Appointing LEA Director of Education E Governors _______C O U N T Y H A L L • G L E N F I E L D • L E I C E S T E R • L E 3 8 R A_____ T E L E P H O N E: 0116 232 3232 • F A X: 0116 265 6260 • M I N I C O M: 0116 265 6160 8. Implementing the Expanded Shire Grants Scheme Acting Director of F Planning and Transportation, Director of Education, Head of Museums and Chief Executive 9.
    [Show full text]
  • East Midlands Thermal EHV System Map-Default
    EAST MIDLANDS DISTRIBUTED GENERATION CONSTRAINT MAP MISSON MISTERTON DANESHILL NORTH GENERATION WHEATLEY WEST BURTON HV TRUSTHORPE DB HALLCROFT RD HVB HALFWAY HOLME WORKSOP RETFORD B.R. CARR WEST ORDSALL RD WORKSOP ECKINGTON HVA KILTON RD CHECKERHOUSE WESTHORPE WOODBECK DB WRAGBY MANTON LINCOLN CHESTERFIELD WHITWELL CLOWNE SOUTH CARLTON BUXTON EYAM SHEEPBRIDGE STAVELEY ALFORD CRAGGS LANE STAVELEY WORKS BEVERCOTES CY SHEFFIELD ANDERSON LANE ROAD CF CHAPEL ST HX AX FISKERTON LEONARDS LINCOLN ROBIN HOOD GOITSIDE BOLSOVER TUXFORD HORNCASTLE QUEENS PARK RUSTONS ROBERT HYDE BUDBY CHESTERFIELD DH CHESTERFIELD WALTON WARSOP DODDINGTON ROOKERY FLAGG BAKEWELL PARK HINDLOW LANE WINGERWORTH SOOKHOLME THORESBY NORTH HYKEHAM INGOLDMELLS SHIREBROOK OLLERTON PC ACREAGE LANE GRASSMOOR CS SPILSBY MIDDLEMARSH BIWATER SWINDERBY WADDINGTON CT CARLTON ON TRENT MANSFIELD CLIPSTONE DANESMOOR BILSTHORPE MILLCLOSE WOODHALL SPA SKEGNESS WARTH LANE LINCOLN SKEGNESS METHERINGHAM CH HR TEVERSAL CROWN FM MATLOCK CO SKEGBY LANE LIME TREE PLACE HUTHWAITE HUTHWAITE RUFFORD AX WINSTER SUTTON BLACKWELL JUNCTION WESSINGTON MANSFIELDAU ALFRETON FARNSFIELD NEWARK STICKNEY TATTERSHALL MEADOW LANE PINITON CROMFORD NEWARK LONGCLIFFE BENTINCK AX ANNESLEY STAYTHORPE 'B' JUNCTION SITE BLIDWORTH AU HOPTON KIRKBY SOMERCOTES HL SOUTHWELL STAYTHORPE 'C' SHERWOOD HL HL DE PARK AMBERGATE RIPLEY WESTWOOD LEADENHAM AR HM AD HAWTON TZ RUSKINGTON HA WRANGLE CRANWELL CALVERTON HUCKNALL AD HMT MOORGREEN NOTTINGHAM LANGRICK CO SLEAFORD BELPER HEANOR TOWN CAYTHORPE DENBY ARNOLD SIBTHORPE ASHBOURNE
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 10
    Document Pack Page 347 Agenda Item 10 CABINET – 22ND JANUARY 2002 MULTI - MODAL STUDY - M1 CORRIDOR CONSULTATION REPORT ON DRAFT PREFERRED PACKAGE REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND TRANSPORTATION PART A Purpose of Report 1. To inform Cabinet of the consultation report received from consultants W.S. Atkins acting on behalf of the Department of Transport Local Government and the Regions (DTLR) on the draft preferred package for the M1 Corridor and to recommend an appropriate response. Recommendation 2. It is recommended that the suggested response set out in paragraph 59 of this report be approved and sent as the response of the County Council. Reason for Recommendation 3. To enable the County Council's views to be taken into account in finalising the preferred strategy to be recommended by the team of consultants completing the multi-modal study. Timetable for Decisions 4. The consultation report was received on 28th December 2001 and invites a formal response by 25th January 2002. It will be acceptable for the County Council's response to be sent shortly after this date. 5. It is proposed that this matter be considered by Cabinet on 22nd January 2002; by the Planning and Environment Scrutiny Committee on 24th January 2002; and a final decision made by Cabinet on 5th February 2002. This will allow an interim response following Cabinet on 22nd January and a final response following Cabinet on 5th February. Policy Framework and Previous Decisions 6. An initial response to a consultation report on strategy development was approved by Cabinet at its meeting on 6th February 2001.
    [Show full text]
  • Ivanhoe Line Stage II Scheme Re-Appraisal
    Leicestershire County Council Ivanhoe Line Stage II Scheme Re-Appraisal Final April 2009 Leicestershire County Council Ivanhoe Line Stage II Scheme Re-Appraisal Revision Schedule Ivanhoe Line Stage II Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 July 2008 Draft Tony Magee - Senior Transport Planner Principal Engineer 2 Sept 2008 Draft Tony Magee - Senior Transport Planner Principal Engineer 3 Nov 08 Draft Richard Carr Phil Deaves Rail Operations Manager Consultant Principal Engineer 4 21 Nov 08 Draft Richard Carr Phil Deaves Rail Operations Manager Consultant Principal Engineer 5 9 Jan 09 Draft Principal Engineer Associate Associate 6 23 Feb 09 Final Principal Engineer Associate Associate 7 30 Apr 09 Final Principal Engineer Associate Associate Scott Wilson 12 Regan Way Chetwynd Business Park This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that Nottingham appointment. It is addressed to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson accepts no liability for any NG9 6RZ use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than the client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, Tel: 0115 907 7000 without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or recommendations within this Fax: 0115 907 7001 document should be read and relied upon only in the context of the document as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Leicester and Leicestershire Rail Strategy
    57 Leicester and Leicestershire Rail Strategy February 2017 www.slcrail.com 58 LEICESTER AND LEICESTERSHIRE RAIL STRATEGY 59 LEICESTER AND LEICESTERSHIRE RAIL STRATEGY DOCUMENT CONTROL Version Amendment details Author Date First issue to clients None SLC Rail 8 December 2016 02 Update of Priority 3 LCC / SLC Rail 13 December 2016 03 Revisions to take account of LCC 21 December 2016 consultation responses and paragraph numbering added 04 Revisions to take account of LCC 30 December 2016 comments received from Assistant Director Highways and Transportation, Leicestershire County Council 04 Minor text corrections and LCC 4 January 2017 tidying 05 Changes proposed by Leicester Leicester City 9 January 2017 City Council Council 0.6 Minor clarifications and SLC 11 January 2017 additions of keys to diagrams Cover image: .............................. Copyright .............. This document is copyright 2016 Leicester City Council, Leicestershire County Council and the Leicestershire Local Enterprise Partnership. The document commissioner is permitted allowable use of the contents, excluding commercial copying/reuse 60 LEICESTER AND LEICESTERSHIRE RAIL STRATEGY 61 LEICESTER AND LEICESTERSHIRE RAIL STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................... 4 Commission 4 Context 4 Priorities 4 Action Plan 7 1. The Commission .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]