DOCSLIB.ORG

"Student Participation in National and International Higher Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
"Student participation in national and international higher education forums in Europe" Daniela Bartolo Academic Affairs Committee European Students' Union The European Students Union An Introduction A short history • 17 October 1982: Founded by seven unions • 1989: WESIB (Western European Students’ Information Bureau) changes to ESIB • 1999: Structural changes are provoked by the start of the Bologna Process • 2007: 25th Anniversary and name change to ESU MainMain AreasAreas ofof workwork • The Bologna Process • The Lisbon Strategy • Equal opportunities • Students’ financing • Students’ mobility • Students’ rights • Development of the student movement • Doctoral studies and research • Higher education in a globalized world Structure of the organization 4747 National National U Unionsnions of of Students Students from from 38 38 countries countries (full(full members) members) BoardBoard CommissionCommission (2(2 delegates/country) delegates/country) onon Internal Internal Audit Audit CIDCID ExecutiveExecutive SUDC WorkingWorking AACAAC SAC CommiteeCommitee GroupsGroups StaffStaff • ESU associate members: Association of Norwegian Students Abroard (ANSA) Erasmus Student Network European Dental Students European Pharmaceutical Student's Association (EPSA) European Union of Jewish Students (EUJS) Forum of European Muslim Youth and Students Organisation (FEMYSO) International Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Queer Youth and Student Network – IGLYO Organizing Bureau of European School Student Unions (OBESSU) • Cooperation with associate members: ▫ Participation on events, exchange with information, mutual promotional activities • ESU is a member of European Youth Forum (YFJ) Cooperation with member organizations • National unions of students are owners of the organization: ▫ NUSes set the PoW, adopt policies, nominate and elect people working for ESU ▫ ESU elected representatives fulfil the PoW, report on their actions and make proposals to the board. • Information exchange: ▫ Board e-mail list ▫ ESU BackOffice ▫ ESU blog ▫ ESU newsletter “Student Voice” All articles available on ESU webpage ▫ ESU webpage www.esu-online.org POW 2009 / 10 – For a stronger student movement! • Encourage investment in HE during the economic downturn • Defending students’ rights through the development of the student movement • Democratisation of Higher Education by fostering social dimension and equity • Quality higher education for all with students in the centre • “20% mobile students by 2020” – moving towards the European Dimension of HE through making mobility of students a reality Student Participation in Decision Making Where do students fit in? Defining student participation General Definition Defined at the Prague Ministerial Summit as involvement of…students as competent, active and constructive partners in the establishment and shaping of a EHEA. Later on, in Berlin, students’ role was described as full partners in HE governance Participating where it matters Student Participation ESU’s findings Current situation Most NUSes are unhappy with the current situation. 13 out of 34 unions feel that the Bologna Process has had little effect on the level of student participation. Slovenia and Austria report worse level of student representation was the result of a package of reforms as part of Bologna Process implementation 16 out of 34 unions feel the institutional and department level to be the weakest when it comes to student participation Issues to take into consideration • Percentage of representation • Independence of student unions at a national, institutional or course department level • Union funding issues • Participation on BFUGs • Student participation in national report for stocktaking Key recommendations • Greater and better involvement of students in governance of HE is needed. Students must be considered as equal partners in governance involved in all levels of decision-making. • Legislation guaranteeing minimum level of student participation is needed where non existent • Re-examination of union funding to ensure that their independence is not compromised Why is this important? • The 11 million 1st, 2nd and 3rd cycle students represented by ESU comprise the bulk of people affected directly by HE reform agendas • European students have a unique insight into the state of European HE. • However, students are also not invited (as much as they should be) to share their knowledge and participate in HE governance and reform How can we further enhance student participation? Post-Leuven Quo vadis? • Commitments need to be matched by actions... ▫ A comprehensive review of earlier commitments should be undertaken ▫ Policymakers and HEIs should make a serious effort to improve data gathering • ...and Declarations need to be matched by commitments! ▫ The social dimension, student participation and many other action lines of the Bologna Process are neglected by stakeholders Up-Coming debates • The Social dimension of the Bologna Process • Student participation • Quality Assurance • Student Mobility • Research and Doctoral Education • Lifelong Learning • Employability • Attractiveness of the EHEA • Financing of HE And much more.... So where does this lead us? • Governance and reform of Higher Education in Europe should be guided and influenced by students' voices. • BWSE points to the need of including students' views and expertise on all levels of HE reform and governance. Not just by reading BWSE, but by consequently inviting students to participate at the round table of stakeholders. Questions? Thank you! Daniela Bartolo [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Democracy & Citizenship Education
    EU CONVINCE CHALLENGES AND GOOD PRACTICES RELATED TO PROMOTING CITIZENSHIP AND VALUES OF FREEDOM, TOLERANCE AND NON-DISCRIMINATION THROUGH EDUCATION EU CONVINCE PROJECT RESEARCH REPORT Co-funded by the Erasmus+ Programme In associated partnership with of the European Union CHALLENGES AND GOOD PRACTICES RELATED TO PROMOTING CITIZENSHIP AND VALUES OF FREEDOM, TOLERANCE AND NON-DISCRIMINATION THROUGH EDUCATION EU CONVINCE PROJECT RESEARCH REPORT DOMINIQUE DANAU (SAGO RESEARCH) FLORENCE PAULY (P& F CONSULTING) Published by the European Trade Union Committee for Education - Brussels , May 2019 Reproduction of all or part of this publication is permitted without authorisation. However, accreditation to ETUCE must be made and copies must be sent to the ETUCE secretariat. This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Agreement N° 2017-3538 Project N° 592113-EPP-1-2017-1-BE-EPPKA3-IPI-SOC-IN Contents ABBREVIATIONS 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND OF THE RESEARCH 6 2. THE RESEARCH 8 2.1. OBJECTIVES OF THE RESEARCH 8 2.2. THE APPROACH 9 3. THE REPORT: READING GUIDE 10 4. FINDINGS 11 4.1. INTRODUCTION ON CITIZENSHIP AND COMMON VALUES 11 4.2. CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION AND DEMOCRATIC SCHOOL CULTURE 14 4.2.1. ABOUT CIVIC AND CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION AND DEMOCRATIC SCHOOL CULTURE 14 4.2.2. CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION IN PRACTICE: FINDINGS FROM THE CONVINCE RESEARCH 16 4.2.3. MATCHING CHALLENGES AND GOOD/INNOVATIVE EXAMPLES/PRACTICES 19 4.3. TEACHING IN DIVERSE LEARNING CONTEXTS 25 4.3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • ESU · Bologna at the Finish Line' (BAFL) 2 Executive Summary
    The European Students’ Union BolognA AT ThE finiSh linE An account of ten years of European higher education reform BolognA AT ThE finiSh linE An AccoUnT of ten yearS of EUropean highEr EdUcation rEform The European Students’ Union imprinT BolognA at ThE finiSh linE An Account of Ten years of European higher Education reform. content: daniela Bartolo, christian hemmestad Bjerke, Andrea Blättler, ligia deca, inge gielis, Sölvi Karlsson, Kristine Bak nielsen, Allan päll, petri rytkönen, robert Santa, melinda Szabó coordination and Editoring: Andrea Blättler & robert Santa proofreading: Emma di iorio, nUS Scotland policy and public Affairs staff, daniela Bartolo and christian hemmestad Bjerke layout and typesetting: linus rowedda cover illustration: Are Edvardsen This publication is part of the project »Enhancing the Student Contribution to the Bologna Implementation«, printed by laserline, Berlin funded with support from the European Commission. recymago, 100% recycling paper This publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information con- revised online Edition, february 2010 tained therein. original printed Version: Brussels, february 2010 TablE of contents What is BaFL? ................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1 OpEning wordS ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EYE2018 Programme 3 FOREWORDS
    European youthevent Programme 1-2 June 2018 Strasbourg #EYE2018 European youthevent Table of content Forewords .................................................................................................................. p. 5 The EYE follow-up ................................................................................................... p. 8 Programme overview ............................................................................................ p. 9 Activity formats ...................................................................................................... p. 10 Extra activities Collective events ............................................................................................................. p. 15 Activities without booking ............................................................................................... p. 18 Drop-in activities ............................................................................................................. p. 30 Artistic performances ...................................................................................................... p. 42 Bookable activities YOUNG AND OLD: Keeping up with the digital revolution ................................................. p. 50 RICH AND POOR: Calling for a fair share .......................................................................... p. 68 APART AND TOGETHER: Working out for a stronger Europe .............................................. p. 92 SAFE AND DANGEROUS: Staying alive in turbulent times ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Socialerasmus+ Implementation Report: Volunteering on Exchange
    Volunteering on exchange The SocialErasmus+ implementation report 1.292 activities coordinated by 2,526 volunteers across 271 cities in 31 European countries, engaging 86.000 people. Authors: Wim Gabriels, Stefan Jahnke, Josipa Friščić Contributors: Rasmus Benke-Aberg, Erasmus Student Network; Eva Vetter, Joanna Rutkowska, Universität Wien; Ana Fernandez Mosquera, Eva Garea Oya, Maria Isabel Doval Ruis, Universidad de Vigo; Eddy Raepsaet, Scholengroep Vlaamse Ardennen; Manon Suchet, Celia Binet; ESN Besançon, Tamara Gojkovic, Panagiotis Chatzimichail, Youth for Exchange and Understanding Implementation Team: Jeroen van Lent, Elena Iamboglo, Anna Demiri, Filippos Mikropoulos, Panka Paskuj, Josipa Frišči, Candido Otero Design & Editing: Josipa Friščić Copyright © 2019: This publication was developed in the framework of the SocialErasmus+ project. This project has been funded with the support of the European Commission. The publication reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Table of Contents 4 About the project 5 SocialErasmus 6 Methodology 7 Community Management 8 Online Community Management 9 Capacity Building through training 10 Online Communication Campaign 10 SocialErasmus+ Campaign 12 Coverage of the Social Inclusion Days 12 Leave your mark campaign 14 Implementation Results 16 Engagement throughSocial Inclusion Days 17 Focus on schools visits 20 Report on SocialErasmus+ policy impact 21 The SocialErasmus Charter 21 Inclusion in the Erasmus Charter for Higher Education (ECHE) 22 Erasmus Student Charter 23 ECTS User’s Guide 24 Engagement with stakeholders 24 Conclusion 26 Partners SocialErasmus+ Implementation report 3 About the project The SocialErasmus programme incorporates all volunteer activities where international students engage with locals to contribute to their local host society.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaction of the Erasmus Student Network to the New Erasmus+ Programme
    Reaction of the Erasmus Student Network to the new Erasmus+ Programme On the 30th of May 2018, the European Commission presented its proposal1 for the Erasmus+ Successor Programme, running from 2021 to 2027. This document serves as a basis for the work of the European Parliament, European Council, and all civil society organisations involved in the field. Other documents, such as Annual Work Plans or Programme Guides, will complement the information provided by the European Commission, all leading to the final adoption of the programme, expected to happen in 2019. In this reaction, ESN presents its views to the proposal put forward by the European Commission with a special focus on the higher education chapter of Erasmus+. ESN has contributed to the discussion on the Erasmus+ successor programme through its #ErasmusUpgrade Manifesto2. The document is based on an online consultation that reached more than 1000 students directly, and from a series of face-to-face dialogues involving students and volunteers from across ESN’s 40 member countries. The preliminary results of the consultation were presented to the European Commission during a preparatory meeting in August 2017 and publicly discussed during the #ErasmusUpgrade Training and Conference in Brussels in October 2017. This event was attended by representatives from 25 European countries, both EU and non-EU member states, who analysed the results of the consultation and discussed them with decision-makers involved in the revision of the Erasmus+ programme. These participants produced a series of 13 recommendations which are the base for our comments to the programme proposed by the European Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Reseacrh for CULT Committee
    STUDY RequestedThet by the CULT Committee Education and youth in post-COVID-19 Europe – crisis effects and policy recommendations Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 690.872 - May 2021 EN RESEARCH FOR CULT COMMITTEE Education and youth in post-COVID-19 Europe – crisis effects and policy recommendations Abstract This paper demonstrates that the COVID-19 pandemic posed unprecedented and multidimensional challenges to the education systems and youth sector, revealing the lack of preparedness in terms of crisis management and digital education responses, as well as reinforcing structural weaknesses of education delivery. Given that various sectors of education and the youth sector faced distinct challenges, there are valuable lessons to be learnt from policy responses and best practices across Europe. The common goal should be to build more resilient education systems, which are responsive and adaptive to future crises. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Culture and Education. AUTHORS Public Policy and Management Institute: Loes VAN DER GRAAF, Jekatyerina DUNAJEVA, Hanna SIAROVA, Radvile BANKAUSKAITE Research manager: Pierre HERIARD Project, publication and communication assistance: Anna DEMBEK, Kinga OSTAŃSKA Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies, European Parliament LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE PUBLISHER To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to updates on our work for the CULT Committee please write
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents of Pan-European Youth Organisations Call Upon the European Council to Preserve the Schengen Principles
    #he President of the European Council "onald #us$ 2eneral !ecretariat of the Council of the European .nion ;EF Europe 3ue de la 4oi5%etstraat 176 0nternational *rganisation (0!B4 26 !9uare de -ee<s 1048 Bru/elles/Brussel 1000 Brussels , Belgiu' Belgique/Belgi: =>2 2 612 00 6> info?@ef)eu A &&&)@ef)eu 3egistration 1B CBED E 728)602)>7F 0B(1 E BE>6 0011 1287 F781 B0C5!%0F# E 2EB(BEBB Brussels, 17 February 2016 Presidents of pan-European youth organisations call upon the European Council to preser e the !chengen principles Dear President #us$, %e are &riting to you today as representati es of fourteen pan-European youth organisations - representing 'illions of young people across Europe - because &e are seriously &orried about the future of the !chengen (rea) *pen borders are one of Europe’s greatest 'ilestones , &e &ant to $eep it that &ay) #he increased 'igratory pressure in recent 'onths has led to a gradual suspension of the institutions of the !chengen (rea) -ost notably, &e ha e seen temporary reintroductions of border control between !chengen countries) #his is in line &ith the !chengen Borders Code that allo&s for these 'easures only if they are in proportion &ith an established serious threat to public policy or internal security and are li'ited in ti'e) #his de elop'ent goes to sho& that &e ha e failed in gi ing up internal borders &ithout putting the necessary effort as a .nion to secure our external borders) #his has resulted in our go ern'ents not really trusting each other nor the European agreements and their effecti e enforcement.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participants
    DDP-YD/ETC (2021) 21 rev 19 February 2021, Strasbourg Online Consultative Meeting APPLYING INTERSECTIONALITY IN THE YOUTH FIELD in search of a cooperative approach among youth organisations and other stakeholders 24-26 February 2021 List of Participants PARTICIPANTS Bosnia and Herzegovina Maja KLIMENTIC Cooperation and Development Network Eastern Europe Belgium Dragana JOVANOVSKA OBESSU Tajana MOHNACKI Erasmus Student Network Lucasta BATH LYMEC - European Liberal Youth Caroline SMITS European Union of the Deaf Youth Cyprus Ozer SAHOGLU Cypriot Youth Come Front in the Society (CYCFITS) France Zhuoling YOU Coordinating Committee for International Voluntary Service (CCIVS) Germany Jonas GERBER Jugendbildungsstätte Kurt Löwenstein e.V. Hannah WENDLING YMCA Europe Hungary Anna DAROCZI Phiren Amenca International Network AISBL András DÉRI Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Primary and Pre- school Education Dominika NÉMETH Phiren Amenca International Network AISBL Italy Andre K.J. EBOUANEY MBIME, Fondazione Istituto dei Sordi di Torino Onlus Mariama SIMAL DISSO Marta SAPPÉ GRIOT World Student Christian Federation Roberto ROSSETTO Agenzia per la Promozione dei Giovani Laura CAPORALI Associazione Ergon a favore dei Sordi Ireland Lydia MENDES European Union of the Deaf Youth - BIPOC focus group Grace QUINN-NEALON European Union of the Deaf Youth - EDY∞ The Netherlands Naomi M. DOEVENDANS European Network for Independent Living Portugal Vinicius RAMOS European Federation for Intercultural Learning Slovenia Katrin ČEŠČUT EFPSA - European Federation
    [Show full text]
  • Emi Board Elections 2021-2023 Final List of Candidates
    EMI BOARD ELECTIONS 2021-2023 FINAL LIST OF CANDIDATES PRESIDENT Eva MAYDELL, MEP nominated by: European People’s Party (EPP), Association des États Généraux des Étudiants de l’Europe (AEGEE-Europe), Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe (ALDE Party), EM Croatia, EM France, EM Germany, EM Italy, European Youth Forum (EYF), Party of European Socialists (PES) TREASURER Maria HEIDER, nominated by: European Environmental Bureau (EBB), EM Ireland, EM Serbia, European Green Party (EGP) Nataša OWENS, nominated by: EM Croatia, EM Germany, EM North Macedonia, EM France, European People’s Party (EPP), Europäischer Verband Beruflicher Bildungsträger e.V. European Association of Institutes for Vocational Training (EVBB), Party of European Socialists (PES) VICE PRESIDENTS (NATIONAL COUNCILS) Francisco, ALDECOA LUZARRAGA nominated by: EM Spain, EM Croatia, EM Italy Yves, BERTONCINI, nominated by: EM Denmark, EM Croatia, EM France, EM Germany, EM Italy Christine BOSSE, nominated by: EM Croatia, EM Denmark, EM Finland, EM France, EM Germany, EM Ireland, EM Norway Tobias KÖCK, nominated by: EM Croatia, EM Denmark, EM Finland, EM France, EM Germany, EM Serbia, European Youth Forum (EYF) Noelle O’CONNELL, nominated by: EM Finland, EM Serbia, EM Ireland, EM United Kingdom European Movement International Place du Luxembourg 2 | B-1050 Brussels | T +32 (0)2 508 30 88 www.europeanmovement.eu | [email protected] Democracy | Freedom | Solidarity | Unity | Equality VICE PRESIDENTS (INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS) Brando BENIFEI, MEP nominated
    [Show full text]
  • Claiming a Stronger Erasmus for the Empowerment of the Future Generation of Europeans
    Claiming a stronger Erasmus for the empowerment of the future generation of Europeans Reaction of the Erasmus Student Network and the European Students’ Union to the proposed Erasmus+ budget in the Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 On 14 February 2020, the President of the European Council Charles Michel unveiled his draft European Council conclusions for the multiannual budget of the EU for 2021-2027. The document addresses, for the first time, the financial outlook envisioned by the Council for the next multiannual financial framework, including the budget for the successor Erasmus+ Programme. In this reaction, ESN and ESU present their view on the initial budgetary proposal put forward by the European Council with regards to the proposed funding for Erasmus+, with a particular focus on the higher education and youth sectors. ESN and ESU have been contributing to the discussions on the new Erasmus+ Programme in multiple ways. In 2018, ESN’s #ErasmusUpgrade Manifesto was published, consisting of 13 base recommendations for the revised Erasmus+ Programme, which were used as a guide for advocacy on the topic1. ESN and ESU took part in the Erasmusх10 campaign2, coordinated by the European Youth Forum and the Lifelong Learning Platform and supported by 70 civil society organisations, which called upon the European decision-makers to increase the Erasmus Programme funding tenfold. In 2019, in response to the original proposal by the European Commission, ESN published a reaction paper, where the necessity for more investment in the new Erasmus+ Programme was emphasized3. This position has been reiterated in a joint position paper of ESN and ESU4.
    [Show full text]
  • Info-Sheet Students' Housing in Europe
    1 Info-Sheet Students’ Housing in Europe The students’ perspective on the overall situation, main challenges and ​ national best practises . Photo by Leah Kelley from Pexels ​ ​ ​ 2 The current state of play with regards to student housing in Europe “Accommodation costs continue to be one of the most important if not the most important expenditure item for students especially for those who live away from their parents. ” EUROSTUDENT VI” ​ When looking at the current situation linked to affordable, sufficient and high-quality students’ housing in Europe we can see a number of clear patterns affecting the issue in almost all of the countries that answered our survey. In general, students experience an ongoing rise in rent prices especially in bigger European cities where most higher education institutions are located. Insufficient provision of student housing and a universal lack of vacancies on the housing market aggravate the problem. The situation is particularly terrifying for internationals students that encounter vast difficulties when trying to access the housing market in a variety of countries. International students suffer from structural discrimination and rejection on the basis of racial discrimination both from landlords and fellow students who prefer to share their dormitory with students that share the same mother tongue. The substantial lack of available students’ accommodation and the continuous rise of housing costs appears to be the biggest overall issue in the assessed countries. National Unions of Students (NUS) furthermore report student dormitories with extremely low living standards right up to facilities that possess threats to tenant’s wellbeing. Student unions all over Europe are united in the fight for more affordable high-quality students housing.
    [Show full text]
  • Erasmus Generations'?
    Edinburgh Research Explorer What Should we Expect of 'Erasmus Generations'? Citation for published version: Wilson, I 2011, 'What Should we Expect of 'Erasmus Generations'?', JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1113-1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02158.x Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02158.x Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Peer reviewed version Published In: JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies Publisher Rights Statement: © Wilson, I. (2011). What Should we Expect of 'Erasmus Generations'?. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(5), 1113-1140. 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02158.x General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 25. Sep. 2021 What should we expect of ‘Erasmus generations’? Abstract The Erasmus programme promotes student mobility within the European Union largely on the assumption that mobile students will become more pro-European. This article presents the results of a panel study of Erasmus students which suggest that, while former Erasmus students may be more pro-European than their peers, this is because students who choose to take part are already more pro-European.
    [Show full text]