Sustainable Management Strategies for Control of Flea Beetles Gadi V.P
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Life History and Management of Phyllotreta Cruciferae and Phyllotreta Striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), Pests of Brassicas in the Northeastern United States
University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 2004 The life history and management of Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), pests of brassicas in the northeastern United States. Caryn L. Andersen University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses Andersen, Caryn L., "The life history and management of Phyllotreta cruciferae and Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), pests of brassicas in the northeastern United States." (2004). Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014. 3091. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/3091 This thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses 1911 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE LIFE HISTORY AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE AND PHYLLOTRETA STRIOLATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE), PESTS OF BRASSICAS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Thesis Presented by CARYN L. ANDERSEN Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE September 2004 Entomology © Copyright by Caryn L. Andersen 2004 All Rights Reserved THE LIFE HISTORY AND MANAGEMENT OF PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE AND PHYLLOTRETA STRIOLATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE), PESTS OF BRASSICAS IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Thesis Presented by CARYN L. ANDERSEN Approved as to style and content by: Tt, Francis X. Mangan, Member Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences DEDICATION To my family and friends. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my advisors, Roy Van Driesche and Ruth Hazzard, for their continual support, encouragement and thoughtful advice. -
Companion Planting and Insect Pest Control
Chapter 1 Companion Planting and Insect Pest Control Joyce E. Parker, William E. Snyder, George C. Hamilton and Cesar Rodriguez‐Saona Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55044 1. Introduction There is growing public concern about pesticides’ non-target effects on humans and other organisms, and many pests have evolved resistance to some of the most commonly-used pesticides. Together, these factors have led to increasing interest in non-chemical, ecologically- sound ways to manage pests [1]. One pest-management alternative is the diversification of agricultural fields by establishing “polycultures” that include one or more different crop varieties or species within the same field, to more-closely match the higher species richness typical of natural systems [2, 3]. After all, destructive, explosive herbivore outbreaks typical of agricultural monocultures are rarely seen in highly-diverse unmanaged communities. There are several reasons that diverse plantings might experience fewer pest problems. First, it can be more difficult for specialized herbivores to “find” their host plant against a back‐ ground of one or more non-host species [4]. Second, diverse plantings may provide a broader base of resources for natural enemies to exploit, both in terms of non-pest prey species and resources such as pollen and nectar provided by the plant themselves, building natural enemy communities and strengthening their impacts on pests [4]. Both host-hiding and encourage‐ ment of natural enemies have the potential to depress pest populations, reducing the need for pesticide applications and increasing crop yields [5, 6]. On the other hand, crop diversification can present management and economic challenges for farmers, making these schemes difficult to implement. -
Citation: Badenes-Pérez, F. R. 2019. Trap Crops and Insectary Plants in the Order 2 Brassicales
1 Citation: Badenes-Pérez, F. R. 2019. Trap Crops and Insectary Plants in the Order 2 Brassicales. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 112: 318-329. 3 https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/say043 4 5 6 Trap Crops and Insectary Plants in the Order Brassicales 7 Francisco Rubén Badenes-Perez 8 Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, 28006 9 Madrid, Spain 10 E-mail: [email protected] 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ABSTRACT This paper reviews the most important cases of trap crops and insectary 26 plants in the order Brassicales. Most trap crops in the order Brassicales target insects that 27 are specialist in plants belonging to this order, such as the diamondback moth, Plutella 28 xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), the pollen beetle, Meligethes aeneus Fabricius 29 (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae), and flea beetles inthe genera Phyllotreta Psylliodes 30 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). In most cases, the mode of action of these trap crops is the 31 preferential attraction of the insect pest for the trap crop located next to the main crop. 32 With one exception, these trap crops in the order Brassicales have been used with 33 brassicaceous crops. Insectary plants in the order Brassicales attract a wide variety of 34 natural enemies, but most studies focus on their effect on aphidofagous hoverflies and 35 parasitoids. The parasitoids benefiting from insectary plants in the order Brassicales 36 target insects pests ranging from specialists, such as P. xylostella, to highly polyfagous, 37 such as the stink bugs Euschistus conspersus Uhler and Thyanta pallidovirens Stål 38 (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). -
Urban Agroecology: Designing Biodiverse, Productive and Resilient City Farms
Altieri & Nicholls / Agro Sur 46(2): 49-60, 2018 DOI:10.4206/agrosur.2018.v46n2-07 Urban Agroecology: designing biodiverse, productive and resilient city farms Agroecología urbana: diseño de granjas urbanas ricas en biodiversidad, productivas y resilientes Altieri, M. A.a*, Nicholls, C. I.b a Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley. b Global Studies, University of California, Berkeley. A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Keywords: Urban agriculture (UA) has been bolstered as a major sustainable alternative to enhance food Agroecology security on an urbanized planet. Although it has been estimated that UA can provide 15–20% Urban agriculture Soil quality Biological control of global food, it is questionable weather UA can significantly contribute the level of food self- productive,sufficiency ofand cities, resilient due tourban low yieldsfarms. reachedHerein we in mostdescribe existing the principles urban farms. and Agroecology practices used can in help the Original Research Article, redesignenhance theof urban productive agriculture potential featuring: of UA (a)by increasingproviding keysoil principlesquality via forenhancement the design ofof soildiversified, organic Special Issue: Agroecology and Sustainable Agricultural Systems soil nutrients and water and (b) enhancement of plant health through biological control and plant *Corresponding author: productivitymatter content via and optimal biological planning activity of crop that sequences lead to protection and combinations against pathogens. and efficient use of Miguel A. Altieri E-mail address: [email protected] RESUMEN La agricultura urbana (AU) ha surgido como una importante alternativa sostenible para mejorar la seguridad alimentaria en un planeta urbanizado. -
EFFECTS of WITHIN-FIELD LOCATION of HOST PLANTS and INTERCROPPING on the DISTRIBUTION of Microtheca Ochroloma (Stål) in MIZUNA
EFFECTS OF WITHIN-FIELD LOCATION OF HOST PLANTS AND INTERCROPPING ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF Microtheca ochroloma (Stål) IN MIZUNA By KRISTEN BOWERS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 Copyright 2003 by Kristen Bowers ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee members for their dedication and assistance in this endeavor. In particular, I am grateful to Dr. Swisher for her overall guidance and instruction in scientific method; to Dr. McSorley for his help with experimental design and statistical analysis; and Dr. Webb for thoughtful and persistent editorial comments and use of her lab facilities. I would like to thank my family for their continuous love and support. I would like to thank the Organic Farming Research Foundation for its generous financial support for this project. I would like to thank Rose Koenig for hours of grant writing assistance and her and her family for use of their farm. I would like to thank all the farmers in north central Florida who shared their anecdotal evidence and keen observations with me, and whose experiences were the impetus for this research. I would like to thank my friends and colleagues at UDSA-ARS for their patience and clarification of the finer points of entomology. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iii LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... -
Adaptation of Flea Beetles to Brassicaceae: Host Plant Associations and Geographic Distribution of Psylliodes Latreille and Phyllotreta Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 856: 51–73 (2019)Adaptation of flea beetles to Brassicaceae: host plant associations... 51 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.856.33724 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Adaptation of flea beetles to Brassicaceae: host plant associations and geographic distribution of Psylliodes Latreille and Phyllotreta Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)* Matilda W. Gikonyo1, Maurizio Biondi2, Franziska Beran1 1 Research Group Sequestration and Detoxification in Insects, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germany 2 Department of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Univer- sity of L’Aquila, 67100 Coppito-L’Aquila, Italy Corresponding author: Franziska Beran ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Schmitt | Received 11 February 2019 | Accepted 30 April 2019 | Published 17 June 2019 http://zoobank.org/A85D775A-0EFE-4F32-9948-B4779767D362 Citation: Gikonyo MW, Biondi M, Beran F (2019) Adaptation of flea beetles to Brassicaceae: host plant associations and geographic distribution of Psylliodes Latreille and Phyllotreta Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). In: Schmitt M, Chaboo CS, Biondi M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 8. ZooKeys 856: 51–73. https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.856.33724 Abstract The cosmopolitan flea beetle generaPhyllotreta and Psylliodes (Galerucinae, Alticini) are mainly associated with host plants in the family Brassicaceae and include economically important pests of crucifer crops. In this review, the host plant associations and geographical distributions of known species in these gen- era are summarised from the literature, and their proposed phylogenetic relationships to other Alticini analysed from published molecular phylogenetic studies of Galerucinae. Almost all Phyllotreta species are specialised on Brassicaceae and related plant families in the order Brassicales, whereas Psylliodes species are associated with host plants in approximately 24 different plant families, and 50% are specialised to feed on Brassicaceae. -
Flea Beetle Fact Sheet
Flea Beetles Attacking Brassica Plants in Virginia James A. C. Mason and Thomas P. Kuhar Department of Entomology, Virginia Tech Classification: Order: Coleoptera, Family: Chrysomelidae, Subfamily: Galerucinae, Genus: Phyllotreta Identification: Small beetles ranging from 1.8-2.5mm in length. All flea beetles exhibit an enlarged hind femur (Fig. 1B) that enables their characteristic flea-like jump. The crucifer flea beetle (Phyllotreta cruciferae Goeze) has a metallic blue-black and oval shaped body covered in small holes (Fig. 1A). The striped flea beetle (Phyllotreta striolata Fabricius) has a mostly black body that appears slightly glossy, and typically features two irregular yellow stripes running down the length of the elytra, the hardened outer wings that cover the abdomen (Fig. 1B). The shape of the beetle is similar to that of the crucifer flea beetle and it also bears the same small holes on its exoskeleton. The striped flea beetle can often be confused with other similar beetles in the same genus. Fig. 1. A) Crucifer Flea Beetle (Phyllotreta cruciferae), and the B) Striped Flea Beetle (Phyllotreta striolata). The arrow shows the enlarged hind femur. Life History: The crucifer flea beetle has one to two generations per year in Virginia, although it can have more depending on climate and region. The beetle can complete its life cycle from egg to adult in roughly six or seven weeks (Capinera 2001). The striped flea beetle also has one to two generations per year in or more, especially in warmer areas such as the southern United States. This is due to the relatively short time from egg to adult taking only four to five weeks to complete its life cycle (Capinera 2001). -
Publications
PUBLICATIONS Miguel A Altieri 1. Altieri, M. A., A. v. Schoonhoven and J. D. Doll. 1977. The ecological role of weeds in insect pest management systems: A review illustrated with bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cropping systems. PANS 23(2): 195-205. 2. Altieri, M. A. and J. D. Doll. 1978. Some limitations of weed biocontrol in tropical crop ecosystems in Colombia. In: Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. T. E. Freeman (Ed.), Gainesville, Florida pp. 74-81. 3. Altieri, M. A. and J. D. Doll. 1978. The potential of allelopathy as a tool for weed management in crop fields. PANS 24(4): 495-502. 4. Altieri, M. A., C. A. Francis, A. v. Schoonhoven and J. D. Doll. 1978. A review of insect prevalence in maize (Zea mays L.) and bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) polycultural systems. Field Crops Research I. 33-49. 5. Altieri, M. A. and W. H. Whitcomb. 1979. The potential use of weeds in the manipulation of beneficial insects. HortScience 14(1): 12-18. 6. Altieri, M. A. and W. H. Whitcomb. 1979. Manipulation of insect populations through seasonal disturbance of weed communities. Protection Ecology 1: 185-202. 7. Altieri, M. A. and W. H. Whitcomb. 1979. Predaceous arthropods associated with Mexican tea (Chenopodium ambrosioides L.) in north Florida. Florida Entomologist 62(3): 175-182. 8. Altieri, M. A. and W. H. Whitcomb. 1979. Predaceous and herbivorous arthropods associated with camphorweed (Heterotheca subaxillaris Lamb.) in north Florida. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 15: 290-299. 9. Altieri, M. A. 1980. Diversification of corn agroecosystems as a means of regulating fall armyworm populations. -
Explaining Differences in Flea Beetle Phyllotreta Cruciferae Goeze Densities in Simple and Mixed Broccoli Cropping Systems As a Function of Individual Behavior
Entomol. exp. appl. 62: 201-209, 1992. 91992 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in Belgium. 201 Explaining differences in flea beetle Phyllotreta cruciferae Goeze densities in simple and mixed broccoli cropping systems as a function of individual behavior M. A. Garcia 1 & M. A. Altieri Division of Biological Control, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA; 1Present address: Laborat6rio de Interaq6es Inseto-Planta, Depto. Zoologia, lnst. Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, S. Paulo, C.P. 6109, CEP 13081, Brasil Accepted: August 27, 1991 Key words: Phyllotreta cruciferae, movement behavior, mixed crops Abstract Diversification of habitat has proved to be an efficient way to reduce insect pest levels in agroecosystems, Some general theories used to explain this fact, such as the natural enemies and the resource concen- tration hypotheses, do not always clearly apply because, in many cases, pest individuals and popula- tion response seem controlled by more specific insect-plant interactions. In non replicated plots, we found substantially lower flea beetle densities in mixed broccoli-Vicia cropping systems compared to broccoli monoculture. These results were consistent with those from controlled experiments reported in the lit- erature. To investigate if beetle behavior was related to such population reduction, the movement be- havior of marked individuals of Phyllotreta cruciferae Goeze released in plots composed solely of broccoli plants and of broccoli mixed with Viciafaba or Vicia sativa plants, was followed and analyzed. The mean tenure time of beetles was longer in simple than in mixed cultures. Also, more beetles tended to fly out and leave mixed cultures compared to monoculture. This resulted in faster reduction of artificially in- troduced flea beetle populations in the mixed systems. -
Defence Mechanisms of Brassicaceae: Implications for Plant-Insect Interactions and Potential for Integrated Pest Management
Defence mechanisms of Brassicaceae: implications for plant-insect interactions and potential for integrated pest management. A review Ishita Ahuja, Jens Rohloff, Atle Magnar Bones To cite this version: Ishita Ahuja, Jens Rohloff, Atle Magnar Bones. Defence mechanisms of Brassicaceae: implications for plant-insect interactions and potential for integrated pest management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Springer Verlag/EDP Sciences/INRA, 2010, 30 (2), 10.1051/agro/2009025. hal-00886509 HAL Id: hal-00886509 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00886509 Submitted on 1 Jan 2010 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 30 (2010) 311–348 Available online at: c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2009 www.agronomy-journal.org DOI: 10.1051/agro/2009025 for Sustainable Development Review article Defence mechanisms of Brassicaceae: implications for plant-insect interactions and potential for integrated pest management. A review Ishita Ahuja,JensRohloff, Atle Magnar Bones* Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Realfagbygget, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway (Accepted 5 July 2009) Abstract – Brassica crops are grown worldwide for oil, food and feed purposes, and constitute a significant economic value due to their nutritional, medicinal, bioindustrial, biocontrol and crop rotation properties. -
Adaptation of Flea Beetles to Brassicaceae: Host Plant Associations and Geographic Distribution Of
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 856: 51–73 (2019)Adaptation of flea beetles to Brassicaceae: host plant associations... 51 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.856.33724 REVIEW ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Adaptation of flea beetles to Brassicaceae: host plant associations and geographic distribution of Psylliodes Latreille and Phyllotreta Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae)* Matilda W. Gikonyo1, Maurizio Biondi2, Franziska Beran1 1 Research Group Sequestration and Detoxification in Insects, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germany 2 Department of Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Univer- sity of L’Aquila, 67100 Coppito-L’Aquila, Italy Corresponding author: Franziska Beran ([email protected]) Academic editor: M. Schmitt | Received 11 February 2019 | Accepted 30 April 2019 | Published 17 June 2019 http://zoobank.org/A85D775A-0EFE-4F32-9948-B4779767D362 Citation: Gikonyo MW, Biondi M, Beran F (2019) Adaptation of flea beetles to Brassicaceae: host plant associations and geographic distribution of Psylliodes Latreille and Phyllotreta Chevrolat (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). In: Schmitt M, Chaboo CS, Biondi M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 8. ZooKeys 856: 51–73. https://doi. org/10.3897/zookeys.856.33724 Abstract The cosmopolitan flea beetle generaPhyllotreta and Psylliodes (Galerucinae, Alticini) are mainly associated with host plants in the family Brassicaceae and include economically important pests of crucifer crops. In this review, the host plant associations and geographical distributions of known species in these gen- era are summarised from the literature, and their proposed phylogenetic relationships to other Alticini analysed from published molecular phylogenetic studies of Galerucinae. Almost all Phyllotreta species are specialised on Brassicaceae and related plant families in the order Brassicales, whereas Psylliodes species are associated with host plants in approximately 24 different plant families, and 50% are specialised to feed on Brassicaceae. -
Final Report - House Bill 2427
Final Report - House Bill 2427 Submitted November 1, 2017 Oregon State University Contributors Carol Mallory-Smith, Professor Pete Berry, PhD Graduate Student Gabriel Flick, PhD Graduate Student Department oF Crop and Soil Science Cynthia Ocamb, Associate ProFessor Brianna Claassen, MS Graduate Student Department oF Botany and Plant Pathology Jessica Green, Senior Research Assistant Department oF Horticulture We express appreciation to the reviewers For their time and For their Feedback and constructive comments For improving the report. We thank all those from the specialty seed industry and the canola growers who provided information and technical expertise. We are especially grateFul to the growers who let us use their Fields For the research. PEER REVIEWERS Beverly Gerdeman Ph.D. Dr. James Myers Assistant Research ProFessor Baggett-Frazier ProFessor – Vegetable Entomology Breeding and Genetics Washington State University Mount Vernon Department oF Horticulture NWREC Oregon State University 16650 State Route 536 4017 Ag and LiFe Sciences Bldg Mount Vernon, WA 98273-4768 Corvallis, OR 97331-7304 Lindsey J. du Toit Dr Faye Ritchie ProFessor / Extension Plant Pathologist Senior Research Consultant - Plant Pathology Vegetable Seed Pathologist ADAS Department oF Plant Pathology ADAS Boxworth, Battlegate Road, Washington State University Mount Vernon Boxworth, CB23 4NN NWREC United Kingdom 16650 State Route 536 Mount Vernon, WA 98273-4768, USA Dr. Jamon Van Den Hoek Assistant ProFessor Dr. Glenn Murray College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric ProFessor – Emeritus Sciences Agronomy and Crop Physiology Oregon State University University oF Idaho Strand Hall 347 410 S Polk Street Corvallis, OR 97331-7304 Moscow, Idaho 83843 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS For providing Field pinning map locations: Terry Ross, Integrated Seed Production Don Wirth, Saddle Butte Ag George Pugh, AMPAC Seed Company Macey Wesssels and Mark Beitel, Barenbrug Seed Incorporated GROWER COOPERATORS FOR THE RESEARCH Bashaw Land and Seed INC.