DOCSLIB.ORG

Military & Veteran's Law Section

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Military & Veteran's Law Section Military & Veteran’s Law Section SPEAKER BIOGRAPHIES by order of presentation Michael E. Mulligan U.S. Army Advocacy Center Fort Belvoir, NC Colonel (Retired) Michael E. Mulligan, U.S. Army, Judge Advocate General’s Corps, retired in September 2019 after 30 years of service. His final assignment was as the Senior Judge, U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals, from July 2015 until September 2019. He is currently the civilian Director of the U.S. Army Advocacy Center located on Fort Belvoir, Virginia. Colonel Mulligan received a B.A. in English from the State University of New York at Oswego. He received his Juris Doctor in 1988 from University of Tulsa, John Rogers School of Law, Tulsa, Oklahoma. He served as an Assistant District Attorney in Tulsa County, Oklahoma before joining the Judge Advocate General’s Corps with a direct commission in 1989. He received a LLM, with a Criminal Law specialty, from Judge Advocate General’s School in 1998 and a Masters in Strategic Studies from National Defense University in 2009. Colonel Mulligan is a member of the State Bar of Oklahoma as well as admitted to practice before the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and the United States Supreme Court. As a military prosecutor, Colonel Mulligan was involved in the majority of Army high profile cases beginning with U.S. v. Schapp, a notorious murder by beheading case from Germany in 1992. After the change in sentencing to make life without parole a possible sentence, he was the first trial counsel to obtain a life without parole sentence in a rape/murder case in 1999. Colonel Mulligan was involved in the majority of the Army death penalty cases throughout his career at both trial and on appeal. At the trial level, he was the military prosecutor in two death penalty cases, U.S. v. Akbar and U.S. v. Hasan. The case of U.S. v. Akbar (grenade thrower from 101st Airborne Division) is the first military death penalty case to be affirmed by every reviewing appellate court. The U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari, and Akbar awaits the President’s signature to assign a date of execution. U.S. v. Hasan (the Fort Hood shooting) was recently affirmed by the U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals and will now undergo mandatory review by the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. Colonel Mulligan’s assignments include: Chief, Criminal Law Division, Office of the Judge Advocate General 2013-2015; Chief, Government Appellate Division 2010-2013; Executive Officer, Deputy Commanding General, Multi-National Forces Iraq 2009, Deputy Judge Advocate, U.S. Army Europe, Heidelberg, Germany 2007-2008; Staff Judge Advocate, 7th Joint Multinational Training Center, Grafenwoehr, Germany 2006-2007; Staff Judge Advocate, 1st Infantry Division, Wuerzburg, Germany 2005-2006; Chief, Trial Counsel Assistance Program, U.S. Army Legal Services Agency, 2003-2005; Captain Assignments Officer, PPTO, Office of the Judge Advocate General 2001-2003; Chief, Criminal Law, III Corps, Fort Hood, Texas 1998-2000; Litigation Attorney, Environmental Law Division, U.S. Army Legal Services Agency, Arlington, Virginia 1995-1997; Branch Chief, Government Appellate Division, 1994-1995; Officer-in-Charge, Wiesbaden Legal Center, Germany, 1993-1994; Trial Defense Counsel, 32d Air Defense Command, Darmstadt, Germany, 1992-1993; Trial Counsel, V Corps, Frankfurt, Germany, 1990-1992. Col. Kasia Krul U.S. Army Trial Defense Service Ft. Bragg, NC Colonel Katherine “Kasia” Krul Stich is the US Army Trial Defense Service Regional Defense Counsel (RDC) for the Southeast. She assumed RDC duties in July 2019, reporting from The Judge Advocate General’s Personnel, Plans and Training Office where she last served as the Chief, Judge Advocate General’s Assignments Branch. Colonel Stich received a direct commission into the US Army Judge Advocate General’s Corps in 2001, immediately following graduation from the University of South Carolina School of Law in 2000. Colonel Stich is married to COL Patrick T. Stich. They have two strong elementary school aged daughters. EDUCATION: 2008 – LL.M., Military Law, The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center & School 2000 – J.D., University of South Carolina School of Law 1997 – B.A. Political Science, Saint Bonaventure University PREVIOUS ASSIGNMENTS: 1. 2016-2019- Personnel, Plans and Training Office Career Manager, US Army Pentagon 2. 2014-2016- Deputy Staff Judge Advocate, Fort Sill, OK 3. 2012-2014– Student, Command and General Staff College, Chief of Administrative Law, Fort Leavenworth, KS 4. 2011-2012 – Labor Law Attorney, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii 5. 2010-2011: Senior Defense Counsel, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii 6. 2008-2010 – Brigade Judge Advocate, 3rd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, Hawaii/Tikrit Iraq 7. 2007-2008- Student, Graduate Course, TJAGLCS 8. 2004-2007- Defense Counsel, Chief of Justice, Chief of Administrative Law, Fort Jackson, SC 9. 2001-2004 – Legal Assistance, Claims, Trial Counsel and Brigade Judge Advocate, Fort Drum NY (deployments to Kosovo and Afghanistan) 10. 2001- Student, Judge Advocate General’s Officer Basic Course Kenny Dojaquez Carpenter Chartered Topeka, KS Kenny Dojaquez is a retired Major of the US Army. He served in Iraq as a Cavalry Troop Commander and was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and the Combat Action Badge for his service in Iraq. He is a graduate of West Point and the University of South Carolina School of Law. He represents veterans at all levels within the VA as well as the US Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims and the US Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Kenny is a regular speaker on veteran's disability topics both nationally and locally. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BATTLEFIELD UPDATE Newsletter of the AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD PROTECTION PROGRAM U.S
    JSpring1998 Issue No. 69 BATTLEFIELD UPDATE newsletter of the AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD PROTECTION PROGRAM U.S. Department of the Interior • National Park Service • Heritage Preservation Services 1998 BATTLEFIELD PRESERVATION PROJECTS SELECTED COIN FUNDS SUPPORT BRANDY STATION PURCHASE The American Battlefield Protection Program thanks everyone who applied for 1998 project funding. This year's competition was open to projects at battlefields On February 19, 1998, the Secretary of the associated with all wars and battles fought on American soil. As in the past, Interior approved The Civil War Trust's however, projects addressing sites listed on the Civil War Sites Advisory proposal to award $500,000 in Civil War Commission's Priority I and II lists took precedence. commemorative coin revenues to the Association for the Preservation of Civil The ABPP received 63 applications for eligible projects. The review panel of War Sites (APCWS). APCWS will use the ten historians and preservation planners recommended funding 20 projects that funds to assist in the purchase of battlefield exemplify strong battlefield land preservation strategies. Reviewers based their land at Brandy Station, in Culpeper County, ^selections on seven criteria: 1) significance of the site; 2) level of threat to the Virginia. After almost ten years of bitter battlefield; 3) battlefield land preservation opportunity; 4) clear project objec­ disputes between preservationists and tives, tasks, and schedule; 5) community support and participation in the project; developers, APCWS has successfully i6) qualifications of the applicant; and 7) clear and justified project budget. financed the acquisition of 571 acres of core battlefield land at Brandy Station. National Park Service Director Robert Stanton approved the list of projects on APCWS plans to place the entire acquisi­ March 2, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Jackson (1808 – 1861)
    General History of Fort Jackson To understand the history of Fort Jackson, we must realize that the land surrounding the fort today is far different from what it was when European first saw the Savannah River. The river flowed through many marshy fields resembling a flat plain. The appearance of the area caused the founder of Georgia, General James Edward Oglethorpe, to name the river and town “Savannah,” meaning a treeless plain or relatively flat, open region. When early Indians built large ceremonial mounds near the river, they could not find dry land to build on closer than a mile from the river. One set of these mounds was located about 1600 yards southwest of the future site of Fort Jackson. No doubt General Oglethorpe noticed these mounds as he searched for high ground for his settlement in 1733. As the river flowed around present-day Hutchinson’s Island, the two channels rejoined north of a small clay island which rose just a few feet above the water at high tide. The convergence of these channels created a deepening to about 30 feet, more than ten feet deeper than normal. This part of the river became known as Five Fathom Hole. A few years later, an illiterate brick mason named Thomas Salter chose a site for a brickyard three miles east of the city on the south bank of the Savannah River where he hoped to earn a good living making bricks for housing foundations. The spot he chose was actually the small clay island. The brick-making trade was one of intense hand labor and has not changed in hundreds of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Commandant's Annual Report, 1961-1962
    COMMANDANT'S ANNUAL REPORT 1961 ... 1962 The Judge Advocate General's School United States Army Charlottesville, Virginia FOREWORD It is with great pleasure and much satisfaction that I present the Commandant's Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1962. Al­ though this represents the first report of this type published by The Judge Advocate General's School, it is intended that it become an integral feature in chronicling the continuing development of the Army's military law center. The report has a three-fold purpose: --- 1. To summarize the operations of the School during the past fiscal year. ---------2. To preserve in printed form a record of the School, its staff and faculty, students, and enlisted personnel. ~ To describe the various courses of instruction offered at - The Judge Advocate General's School. ThiE report reflects continued progress on the part of The Judge Advocate General's School. The value of any educational institution, however, is measured by how well it prepares its student body for the roles which await them upon graduation. Accordingly, our goal, as in the past, is to increase and make more effective our services to the Army by thorough preparation of officers for service in the Judge Advocate General's Corps. JOHN F. T. MURRAY Colonel, J AGC Commandant i COMMANDANT'S ANNUAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Section I -The Judge Advocate General's School Today ....................... 1 Mission ............... 1 History ..... 3 Section II -Organization of The Judge Advocate General's School ............ .......... 5 Academic Department ................ 5 Nonresident Training Department 5 Research and Publications Department 5 Office of School Secretary .
    [Show full text]
  • National Cemeteries Dates Established and First Burials
    National Cemeteries Dates Established and First Burials Original National Cemeteries: Cemetery Location Established First Burial Alexandria Alexandria, Va. 1862 1862 Annapolis Annapolis, Md. 1862 1862 Antietam1 Sharpsburg, Md. 1862 1862 Camp Butler Springfield, Ill. 1862 1862 Cypress Hills Brooklyn, N.Y. 1862 1848 Danville Danville, Ky. 1862 1862 Fort Leavenworth Fort Leavenworth, Kan. 1862 1827 Fort Scott Fort Scott, Kan. 1862 1862 Keokuk Keokuk, Iowa 1862 1861 Loudon Park Baltimore, Md. 1862 1861 Mill Springs Nancy, Ky. 1862 1862 New Albany New Albany, Ind. 1862 1862 Philadelphia2 Philadelphia, Pa. 1862 1862 Soldiers' Home3 Washington, D.C. 1862 1862 1 Antietam National Cemetery and Battlefield Site is administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior. The cemetery was established in 1862, but title to the land was not transferred to the War Department until 1877. 2 Union Soldiers who died in hospitals near Philadelphia were buried in seven different cemeteries. These soldiers were disinterred and moved to the present location in 1885. 3 U.S. Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home National Cemetery is administered by the U.S. Department of the Army. Established from 1862 to 1872 for reinterments of Civil War battle dead, soldiers who died while held prisoner and soldiers who died in hospitals. Cemetery Location Established First Burial Beaufort Beaufort, S.C. 1863 1863 Cave Hill Louisville, Ky. 1863 1861 Gettysburg4 Gettysburg, Pa. 1863 1863 Knoxville Knoxville, Tenn. 1863 1863 Lexington Lexington, Ky. 1863 1861 Rock Island Rock Island, Ill. 1863 1815 Beverly Beverly, N.J. 1864 1864 Mound City Mound City, Ill. 1864 1864 Andersonville4 Andersonville, Ga.
    [Show full text]
  • WILL History Train Trip Full Itinerary
    The Cincinnati Railway Co. History Train 2019 #2 to Savannah, Charleston & Washington DC View of the Moonlight Dome car Old Fort Jackson, the oldest brick fortification on the East Coast. 9 Days April 26-May 4, 2019 From LL ABOARD for our 8th private rail journey! $4994* Join our history-themed rail tour as we travel east to Washington DC then south • Unique rail journey itinerary • Private restored A to Georgia. Celebrate the golden age of trains on train cars from 1950s • Fine dining • Premium private, restored train cars built between 1946 beverages and snacks • Sleeping accommodations and 1950. Our private cars include a dome car, • Chicago • Washington DC: Steven F. Udvar- the Moonlight Dome with 4 deluxe bedrooms, Hazy Center - Air & Space Museum • Savannah and the Birch Grove with roomettes and standard GA: Green-Meldrim Home, Georgia State double bedrooms. Our train cars are hooked to the Railroad Museum, Savannah History Museum, end of Amtrak’s Capitol Limited then unhooked Old Fort Jackson, Fort Pulaski, Historic District and parked at Washington DC’s Union Station. • Charleston SC: USS Yorktown, Fort Sumter, Then our journey continues hooked to Amtrak’s Historic District • Amtrak’s Capitol Limited & Palmetto to our destination, Savannah where we Palmetto are again unhooked and parked. Day 4 Monday: Savannah-Charleston, South Carolina-Savannah This morning we drive to Charleston, South Carolina and visit the USS Yorktown before the sun is too high in the sky—World War II warships do not have air condi- tioning! Commissioned in 1943 as one of the 24 Essex class aircraft carriers (the most numerous class of ships and backbone of the US Navy), she carried the name of the carrier lost at the battle of Midway and is the fourth ship to carry the name of the last major battle of the American Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington
    A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F.
    [Show full text]
  • 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98Th Congress an Act
    PUBLIC LAW 98-115—OCT. 11, 1983 97 STAT. 757 Public Law 98-115 98th Congress An Act To authorize certain construction at military installations for fiscal year 1984, and for Oct. 11, 1983 other purposes. [H.R. 2972] Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled. That this Act may Military be cited as the "Military Construction Authorization Act, 1984'\ Au'thorizSn Act, 1984. TITLE I—ARMY AUTHORIZED ARMY CONSTRUCTION AND LAND ACQUISITION PROJECTS SEC. 101. The Secretary of the Army may acquire real property and may carry out military construction projects in the amounts shown for each of the following installations and locations: INSIDE THE UNITED STATES UNITED STATES ARMY FORCES COMMAND Fort Bragg, North Carolina, $31,100,000. Fort Campbell, Kentucky, $15,300,000. Fort Carson, Colorado, $17,760,000. Fort Devens, Massachusetts, $3,000,000. Fort Douglas, Utah, $910,000. Fort Drum, New York, $1,500,000. Fort Hood, Texas, $76,050,000. Fort Hunter Liggett, California, $1,000,000. Fort Irwin, California, $34,850,000. Fort Lewis, Washington, $35,310,000. Fort Meade, Maryland, $5,150,000. Fort Ord, California, $6,150,000. Fort Polk, Louisiana, $16,180,000. Fort Richardson, Alaska, $940,000. Fort Riley, Kansas, $76,600,000. Fort Stewart, Georgia, $29,720,000. Presidio of Monterey, California, $1,300,000. UNITED STATES ARMY WESTERN COMMAND Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, $31,900,000. UNITED STATES ARMY TRAINING AND DOCTRINE COMMAND Carlisle Barracks, Pennsylvania, $1,500,000. Fort Benjamin Harrison, Indiana, $5,900,000.
    [Show full text]
  • The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices
    A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Forts in Arlington by C
    Civil War Forts in Arlington By C. B. RosE, JR. When the fall of Fort Sumter on April 14, 186!, made it clear that an armed struggle between North and South could be avoided no longer, it was obvious that the City of Washington would be in a difficult position. There was little doubt that Virginia would follow her southern sister States and secede from the Union. Thus a hostile shore would face the Northern Capital, which lacked any strong natural defenses. For political as well as military reasons it was of prime importance to the Federal Government to secure its capital from attack. Since the Executive Mansion and many Government buildings were exposed to artillery fire from the heights on the Virginia side of the Potomac, it was essential to retain that comm anding position in Fed­ eral hands. Arlington Heights in turn had to be protected from attack. This entailed the construction south of the Potomac of an elaborate system of defenses, most of which lay within what is now Arlington County. Alexandria was seized by Northern forces partly because of its command of the Potomac and partly because of its connection with the railroad system to the south. This occupation called for a further fortification system which was not strictly part of the defenses of Washington and which is not considered here in detail. In the month which intervened between the action of the Virginia Con­ vention on secession and the ratification of this action by the people of Vir­ ginia on May 23, 1861, the only step taken by the defenders of Washington was a limited, surreptitious reconnaissance of the areas around the Virginia ends of the Aqueduct and Long Bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Monroe Hampton, VA Reconnaissance Study May 2008
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Monroe Hampton, VA Reconnaissance Study May 2008 1 This reconnaissance study has been prepared at the request of members of Congress to explore specific resources and advise on whether these resources merit further consideration, through a congressionally authorized Special Resource Study, for potential designation as a unit of the national park system. Publication and transmittal of this report should not be considered an endorsement or a commitment by the National Park Service to seek or support specific legislative authorization for the project or its implementation. Authorization and funding for any new commitments by the National Park Service will have to be considered in light of competing priorities for existing units of the national park system and other programs. This report was prepared by the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Northeast Region. For further information contact: National Park Service Division of Park Planning and Special Studies 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 215–597-7260 Front Cover: Old Point Comfort and Hygeia Hotel, Virginia. Drawn from nature, lithograph & print. by E. Sachse & Co., Balto. Pub. & sold by C. Bohn, Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C.: C. Bohn, c. 1861. Image courtesy of Library of Congress, American Memory Collection, Civil War Maps. Accessed 04/23/2008. http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.gmd/g3884h.cw0547000 2 RECONNAISSANCE STUDY OF FORT MONROE IN HAMPTON, VIRGINIA CONDUCTED BY THE NORTHEAST REGION OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE May 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY--------------------------------------------------------------1 II. PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY -------------------------------------------------4 III.
    [Show full text]
  • American Military History
    CATALOGUE THREE HUNDRED TWENTY-FOUR AmericAn militAry History WILLIAM REESE COMPANY 409 Temple Street New Haven, CT 06511 (203) 789-8081 A Note This catalogue is devoted to American military history from colonial times to World War II, with substantial sections on the American Revolution and the Civil War, but also covering the French and Indian War, earlier colonial conflicts, the War of 1812, Indian wars from the Seminole War to Wounded Knee, the Mexican-American War, and other conflicts. Notable are Mante’s history of the French and Indian War; the Jefferys atlas to the Revolution; the archive of the British commissary general in America, 1774-77; a wonderful collection of letters of leading Confederate generals; Homer’s Life in Camp lithographs; the proclamation of American military government in California at Monterrey in 1847; Revolutionary maps and broadsides; pamphlets describing Oglethorpe’s 1740 expedition against Florida; important Civil War maps; and numerous letters. Some of the items listed here came from the distinguished collection of Charles R. Sanders, one of the great collectors of American military history. Available on request or via our website are our recent catalogues 318 The Caribbean, 319 Western Americana, 320 Manuscripts & Archives, 322 Forty Years a Bookseller, and 323 For Readers of All Ages: Recent Acquisitions in Americana, as well as Bulletins 35 American Travel, 36 American Views & Cartography, 37 Flat: Single Significant Sheets, 38 Images of the American West, and many more topical lists. Some of our catalogues, as well as some recent topical lists, are now posted on the internet at www.reeseco.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Manuscripts
    CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS MANUSCRIPT READING ROW '•'" -"•••-' -'- J+l. MANUSCRIPT READING ROOM CIVIL WAR MANUSCRIPTS A Guide to Collections in the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress Compiled by John R. Sellers LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON 1986 Cover: Ulysses S. Grant Title page: Benjamin F. Butler, Montgomery C. Meigs, Joseph Hooker, and David D. Porter Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Library of Congress. Manuscript Division. Civil War manuscripts. Includes index. Supt. of Docs, no.: LC 42:C49 1. United States—History—Civil War, 1861-1865— Manuscripts—Catalogs. 2. United States—History— Civil War, 1861-1865—Sources—Bibliography—Catalogs. 3. Library of Congress. Manuscript Division—Catalogs. I. Sellers, John R. II. Title. Z1242.L48 1986 [E468] 016.9737 81-607105 ISBN 0-8444-0381-4 The portraits in this guide were reproduced from a photograph album in the James Wadsworth family papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress. The album contains nearly 200 original photographs (numbered sequentially at the top), most of which were autographed by their subjects. The photo- graphs were collected by John Hay, an author and statesman who was Lin- coln's private secretary from 1860 to 1865. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. PREFACE To Abraham Lincoln, the Civil War was essentially a people's contest over the maintenance of a government dedi- cated to the elevation of man and the right of every citizen to an unfettered start in the race of life. President Lincoln believed that most Americans understood this, for he liked to boast that while large numbers of Army and Navy officers had resigned their commissions to take up arms against the government, not one common soldier or sailor was known to have deserted his post to fight for the Confederacy.
    [Show full text]