DOCSLIB.ORG

2003 Annual Report and 2004 Plan Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2003 Annual Report and 2004 Plan Update Technology Advancement Office Clean Fuels Program 2003 Annual Report and 2004 Plan Update South�Coast�Air�Quality�Management�District Cleaning the air that we breathe... South Coast Air Quality Management District Governing Board Chairman Vice Chairman William A. Burke, Ed.D.* S. Roy Wilson, Ed.D.** Assembly Speaker Appointee Supervisor, Riverside County County Representatives Cities Representatives Michael D. Antonovich Jan Perry Supervisor, Los Angeles County Councilmember, City of Los Angeles Los Angeles County, Western Region James W. Silva Supervisor, Orange County Beatrice J.S. LaPisto-Kirtley Mayor Pro Tem, City of Bradbury Bill Postmus Los Angeles County, Eastern Region Supervisor, San Bernardino County William S. Craycraft* Councilmember, City of Mission Viejo Orange County Cities State Representatives Jane W. Carney Ronald O. Loveridge Senate Rules Committee Appointee Mayor, City of Riverside Riverside County Cities Cynthia Verdugo-Peralta* Governor’s Appointee Dennis R. Yates* Councilmember, City of Chino San Bernardino County Cities Executive Officer Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env. * Technology Committee Members ** Technology Committee Chairman South Coast Air Quality Management District Technology Advancement Office Chung S. Liu, D.Env., Deputy Executive Officer, Science & Technology Advancement Henry Hogo, Assistant Deputy Executive Officer, Science & Technology Advancement Larry Kolczak, Community Relations Manager Fred Minassian, Technology Implementation Manager Matt Miyasato, Technology Demonstrations Manager Dean Saito, Fleet Rule Implementation Manager Gary Dixon, Special Technologies Project Manager Paul Wuebben, Clean Fuels Officer Naveen Berry, Program Supervisor Michael Bogdanoff, Program Supervisor David Coel, Program Supervisor Connie Day, Program Supervisor Ranji George, Program Supervisor Marty Kay, Program Supervisor Dipankar Sarkar, Program Supervisor Larry Watkins, Program Supervisor Al Baez, Senior Air Quality Engineer Howard Lange, Assistant Air Quality Engineer Phil Barroca, Air Quality Specialist Mark Coleman, Air Quality Specialist Larry Irwin, Air Quality Specialist Abid Latif, Air Quality Specialist Von Loveland, Air Quality Specialist Lisa Mirisola, Air Quality Specialist Adewale Oshinuga, Air Quality Specialist Shashi Singeetham, Air Quality Specialist Vicki White, Air Quality Specialist Geri Koerner, Staff Specialist Phil Yenovkian, Staff Specialist Dory Kilgour, Senior Administrative Secretary Drue Ramirez, Senior Administrative Secretary Penny Shaw Cedillo, Secretary Majorie Eaton, Secretary Donna Vernon, Secretary Lani Montojo, Staff Assistant Michelle White, Contracts Assistant Flor Tumambing, Senior Office Assistant Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee Staff Cynthia Ravenstein, Staff Specialist Matt MacKenzie, Senior Office Assistant Rachel Valenzuela, Senior Office Assistant 2003 Annual Report/2004 Plan Update Table of Contents Executive Summary...................................................................................... Ex-1 Clean Fuels Program ..........................................................................................1 Summary....................................................................................................................................1 The Need for Advanced Technologies.......................................................................................2 Program Funding .......................................................................................................................3 Program Review.........................................................................................................................4 Core Technologies .....................................................................................................................5 Program Impact...................................................................................................9 Benefits of the Clean Fuels Program .........................................................................................9 Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D)............................................................10 Technology Commercialization...............................................................................................12 2003 Project Expenditures ...............................................................................15 Financial Summary ..................................................................................................................15 Review of Audit Findings........................................................................................................16 Project Summaries ...................................................................................................................21 Fuel Cell Technology......................................................................................................................21 Hydrogen Technology and Infrastructure .......................................................................................23 Engine Technology .........................................................................................................................27 Infrastructure and Fuel Production .................................................................................................28 Electric/Hybrid Technologies .........................................................................................................31 Emission Control Technology.........................................................................................................33 Emission Studies .............................................................................................................................35 Health..............................................................................................................................................35 Outreach and Technology Transfer.................................................................................................36 Progress in 2003 ...............................................................................................41 Key Projects Completed ..........................................................................................................41 Future Technologies.........................................................................................47 Funding Priorities for 2004......................................................................................................47 Program Review.......................................................................................................................48 Summary of Technical Priorities .............................................................................................50 Target Project Allocations .......................................................................................................54 Program Plan Update .......................................................................................55 Fuel Cell Technology......................................................................................................................60 Hydrogen Technology and Infrastructure .......................................................................................67 Engine Technology .........................................................................................................................72 Infrastructure and Fuel Production .................................................................................................76 Electric/Hybrid Technologies .........................................................................................................79 Emission Control Technology.........................................................................................................88 Emission Studies .............................................................................................................................94 Health..............................................................................................................................................96 Stationary Source Clean Fuel Technology......................................................................................99 VOC/Toxics Technologies............................................................................................................105 Outreach and Technology Transfer...............................................................................................108 March 2004 i 2003 Annual Report/2004 Plan Update Table of Contents (Continued) Appendix A Technology Advancement Advisory Group ......................................................................... A-1 SB 98 Clean Fuels Advisory Group...................................................................................... A-2 Appendix B Open Clean Fuels Contracts as of January 1, 2004................................................................B-1 Appendix C Final Reports for 2003 ...........................................................................................................C-1 Figures Figure 1. Major Source Contributions (2010) .................................................................................2 Figure 2. Distribution of Governing Board Approved Clean Fuels Funds CY 2003....................16 Figure 3. Resource Allocation Proposed by Advisors and Participants at Clean Fuels Program Retreat (January 2004) ...................................................................................................49
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantitative Analysis of a Successful Public Hydrogen Station
    international journal of hydrogen energy 37 (2012) 12731e12740 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/he Quantitative analysis of a successful public hydrogen station Tim Brown*, Shane Stephens-Romero, G. Scott Samuelsen Advanced Power and Energy Program University of California, Irvine, California 92697-3550, USA article info abstract Article history: Reliable hydrogen fueling stations will be required for the successful commercialization of Received 10 March 2012 fuel cell vehicles. An evolving hydrogen fueling station has been in operation in Irvine, Received in revised form California since 2003, with nearly five years of operation in its current form. The usage of 31 May 2012 the station has increased from just 1000 kg dispensed in 2007 to over 8000 kg dispensed in Accepted 1 June 2012 2011 due to greater numbers of fuel cell vehicles in the area. The station regularly operates Available online 30 June 2012 beyond its design capacity of 25 kg/day and enables fuel cell vehicles to exceed future carbon reduction goals today. Current limitations include a cost of hydrogen of $15 per kg, Keywords: net electrical consumption of 5 kWh per kg dispensed, and a need for faster back-to-back Hydrogen station vehicle refueling. Hydrogen infrastructure Copyright ª 2012, Hydrogen Energy Publications, LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights Fuel cell vehicle reserved. 1. Introduction A significant and globally researched part of this potential infrastructure rollout is fueling station placement [4e7]. The Global climate change, air quality concerns, and the geopo- initial California Hydrogen Highway plan envisioned well- litical and economic instability associated with petroleum fuel spaced fueling stations positioned along major trans- are driving manufacturers, and society, to find alternatives to portation corridors [1].
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to SAE Hydrogen Fueling Standardization
    An Introduction to SAE Hydrogen Fueling Standardization Will James U.S. Department of Energy Fuel Cell Technologies Office 1 | Fuel Cell Technologies Office eere.energy.gov Question and Answer • Please type your question into the question box hydrogenandfuelcells.energy.gov 2 2 | Fuel Cell Technologies Office eere.energy.gov SAE INTERNATIONAL U.S. DOE WEBINAR: An Introduction to SAE Hydrogen Fueling Standardization PARTICIPANTS AND AGENDA DOE WEBINAR: An Introduction to SAE Hydrogen Fueling Standardization •Will James - Moderator •Jesse Schneider - SAE J2601 Standard L.D. Hydrogen Fueling Protocol - SAE J2799 Standard FCEV Communications •Steve Mathison - SAE J2601 Development Fueling- MC Method •Webinar Q&A SAE INTERNATIONAL 4 SAE HYDROGEN FUELING STANDARDIZATION Jesse Schneider (BMW) SAE J2601 & J2799 Sponsor SAE INTERNATIONAL DOE Webinar: Introduction to SAE H2 Fueling Standardization 5 Outline •Hydrogen Fueling Background •SAE H2 Fueling Standardization •SAE J2799 Standard •SAE J2601 Standard •Lab Testing and Field Verification of Hydrogen Fueling •Implementing of SAE J2601 SAE INTERNATIONAL DOE Webinar: Introduction to SAE H2 Fueling Standardization 6 Outline •Hydrogen Fueling Background •SAE H2 Fueling Standardization •SAE J2799 Standard •SAE J2601 Standard •Lab Testing and Field Verification of Hydrogen Fueling •Implementing of SAE J2601 SAE INTERNATIONAL DOE Webinar: Introduction to SAE H2 Fueling Standardization 7 Worldwide hydrogen Infrastructure Developments Status 2014 Europe: Germany • Demo-project Clean Energy Partnership
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Global Commercialization & Development Update
    2010 Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Global Commercialization & Development Update International Partnership for Hydrogen and Fuel Cells in the Economy Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies offer a pathway to enable the use of clean energy sys- tems to reduce emissions, enhance energy security, and stimulate the global economy. As part of a portfolio of clean energy technologies, including energy efficiency, renewable ener- gy and fuels, and battery-electric vehicles, employing hydrogen and fuel cells in the economy will help us to achieve these goals. A decade of sustained global research, development and demonstration (RD&D) is now producing the necessary technological breakthroughs for hydro- gen and fuel cells to compete in the market. This report offers examples of real-world applica- tions around the world and technical progress of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies, includ- ing policies adopted by countries to increase technology development and commercialization. Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies can use diverse do- Benefits of Hydrogen and Fuel Cells as Part of a mestic renewable and low-carbon resources and address Portfolio of Clean Energy Technologies multiple applications across stationary, transportation, and portable power sectors. The challenges facing full • Hydrogen is a clean fuel. When used in fuel cells, the only byproducts are water and heat. commercialization of hydrogen and fuel cell technolo- • Clean hydrogen technology has the potential to gies can be addressed through both, policy mechanisms strengthen national economies and create high-quali- and technology improvements, which requires consistent ty jobs in industries such as fuel cell manufacturing. and focused international collaboration to increase the • Hydrogen can be derived from renewable sources and is fully interchangeable with electricity – hydrogen can incorporation of these technologies in the global energy be used to generate electricity, while electricity can portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Fuel Cell Technologies Market Report
    California Energy Commission DOCKETED 14-IEP-1B TN 73316 JUL 09 2014 Authors This report was a collaborative effort by staff of the Breakthrough Technologies Institute, Inc., in Washington, D.C. Acknowledgement This report was funded through Argonne National Laboratory by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Fuel Cell Technologies Office within the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. The authors relied upon the hard work and valuable contributions of many men and women in government and in the fuel cell industry. The authors especially wish to thank Sunita Satyapal and the staff of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Fuel Cell Technologies Office for their support and guidance. The authors also wish to thank Rachel Gelman of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the many others who made this report possible. Notice This report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, this document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen As a Transportation Fuel in the California Market
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Master of Environmental Studies Capstone Department of Earth and Environmental Projects Science 5-2020 Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen as a Transportation Fuel in the California Market Diana S. Swidler Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/mes_capstones Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Swidler, Diana S., "Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen as a Transportation Fuel in the California Market" (2020). Master of Environmental Studies Capstone Projects. 86. https://repository.upenn.edu/mes_capstones/86 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/mes_capstones/86 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Life Cycle Assessment of Hydrogen as a Transportation Fuel in the California Market Abstract The depletion of natural resources, the impact of human activities on the environment, and the expected increase in global energy consumption are primary concerns to be considered when finding new alternatives to the nation’s energy mix. In this context, hydrogen could potentially be one of the primary sustainable fuels of the future. Hydrogen is considered a clean and efficient energy carrier since its combustion releases zero emissions. It is the most abundant element in the universe, and it can be produced from a variety of processes/technologies, ensuring its production everywhere. The recent development in technologies has allowed for using hydrogen as a transportation fuel, marking what it could be the beginning of a revolution in the vehicle industry. This capstone aims to study the current situation of the hydrogen refueling market in California, an early adopter of Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs), followed by an analysis of the environmental impact of two production processes to produce hydrogen; the steam methane reforming and the electrolysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Pathways to a Hydrogen Future
    Els UK PTF Prelims-I046734 25-6-2007 5:40p.m. Page:i Trim:152MM×229MM Float:Top/Bot T.S:Integra, India Pathways to a Hydrogen Future Font:Helvatica & B.Antiqua 10/12pt T.Area:112X181mm Margins: Top:17mm Gutter:20mm 43 Lines 1 Color Recto Els UK PTF Prelims-I046734 25-6-2007 5:40p.m. Page:ii Trim:152MM×229MM Float:Top/Bot T.S:Integra, India This page intentionally left blank Font:Helvatica & B.Antiqua 10/12pt T.Area:112X181mm Margins: Top:17mm Gutter:20mm 43 Lines 1 Color Recto Els UK PTF Prelims-I046734 25-6-2007 5:40p.m. Page:iii Trim:152MM×229MM Float:Top/Bot T.S:Integra, India Pathways to a Hydrogen Future THOMAS E. DRENNEN JENNIFER E. ROSTHAL AMSTERDAM – BOSTON – HEIDELBERG – LONDON – NEW YORK – OXFORD PARIS – SAN DIEGO – SAN FRANCISCO – SINGAPORE – SYDNEY – TOKYO Font:Helvatica & B.Antiqua 10/12pt T.Area:112X181mm Margins: Top:17mm Gutter:20mm 43 Lines 1 Color Recto Els UK PTF Prelims-I046734 25-6-2007 5:40p.m. Page:iv Trim:152MM×229MM Float:Top/Bot T.S:Integra, India Elsevier Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford OX2 8DP, UK First edition 2007 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (+44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • I Hydrogen Stations II Community Engagement
    H2 Readiness Best practices for hydrogen stations in early- adopter communities Part of the ZEV Action Plan A roadmap toward 1.5 million zero-emission vehicles on California roadways by 2025 April 2014 Fuel cell electric vehicles are powered by electricity generated in a fuel cell from hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen, stored on board the vehicle as a compressed gas, is safe and currently available for industrial uses. FCEVs take 5 to 7 minutes to fll at a hydrogen station and have a range similar to gasoline vehicles (250-400 miles). Hydrogen is nontoxic, noncorrosive and environmentally benign, and can be produced locally from a variety of sources including natural gas, water and biogas. In a FCEV, hydrogen is 2 to 3 times more effcient than gasoline in a conventional vehicle. Hydrogen stations are usually located at existing gas stations and dispense hydrogen as a compressed gas, similar to compressed natural gas. Hydrogen dispensers are similar in appearance to retail fuel dispensers. Hydrogen is delivered at 35 MPa or 70 MPa (5,000 psi or 10,000 psi) to a vehicle’s tank. 2 Best Practices for Hydrogen Stations Best Practices for Hydrogen Stations PB Benefts of Being an Early Market Community In March 2012, Governor Brown issued an executive order directing state government to help accelerate the market for zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) in California. The Executive Order established several milestones on a path toward 1.5 million ZEVs in California by the year 2025. ZEVs include hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) and plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs).
    [Show full text]
  • The Green Vehicle Trend: Electric, Plug-In Hybrid Or Hydrogen Fuel Cell?
    The Green Vehicle Trend: Electric, Plug-in hybrid or Hydrogen fuel cell? Fangzhu Zhang & Philip Cooke, Centre for Advanced Studies, Cardiff University, UK, email: [email protected]. 1. Introduction Energy supply security and global warming continue to challenge all countries around the world in terms of global economy and planet environment. Renewable energy technologies are being explored to meet the challenges of energy security and climate change, as well as to boost regional economic development (Zhang & Cooke, 2008). In this review, we will focus on ‘green innovation’ in transport. The transport sector represents a critical percentage of greenhouse gas emission. Transport emissions are estimated to increase by 84% to 2030 (Tomlinson, 2009). Key technologies such as hydrogen fuel cells, electric cars and biofuels are expected to contribute to emission reduction in the long run. Biofuels have been increasingly explored as a possible alternative source to gasoline with respect mainly to transport. The perspectives on biofuels are reviewed in our previous review (Zhang& Cooke, 2009). Recently, hydrogen, electric and hybrid cars have been developed and demonstrated in global automotive exhibitions. Key interests have been attracted to discuss future trends in green vehicles. Major car manufacturers seek leadership in future green vehicle markets. ‘Green vehicles’, as will be shown, directly use renewable energy sources. The current development of green vehicles by major car markers is listed in Table 1. These models are mainly at demonstration stage. In this report, the current technology status and potential development of green vehicles are reviewed and the development barriers of the technology application are discussed in order to get better understanding of the move towards cleaner energy systems.
    [Show full text]