Draft Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report 2014 CONSENT DECREE ANNUAL REPORT Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report 04.02.15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Annual Report Section Section Name Page 14. GENERAL TERMS .…………………………………………………………… 2 14.a COMPLIANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION …..……………………………… 2 14.b POSTINGS TO THE PUBLIC WEB SITE …….………………………….…… 3 TREATMENT OF INFORMATION ASSERTED TO BE EITHER 14.c 4 TRADE SECRETS OR CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ………………..… 14.d TIMEFRAMES ………………………………………………………………….. 8 14.e PERFORMANCE PLAN …………………………………………………….…. 9 15. OPERATIONAL OVERSIGHT ………………………………………………… 11 15.a.1 DRILLING OPERATIONS – AUDIT .…….…………………………………… 11 15.a.1 DRILLING OPERATIONS – SEMS .………………………….………..……… 14 15.a.2 DRILLING OPERATIONS – STOP-WORK AUTHORITY………………..….. 16 15.b BLOW OUT PREVENTER (“BOP”) CERTIFICATION ……………………… 18 15.c BOP REPORTS………………………………………………………………….. 20 15.c.1 BOP AND PIPE SHEARING REPORT………………………………………… 20 15.c.2 BOP PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GAP ANALYSIS REPORT ……… 21 15.d.1& WELL CONTROL COMPETENCY ASSESSMENTS ………………………… 23 15.d.2 15.d.3 TRAINING …………………………………………………………………….… 25 15.d.4 TRAINING CENTER …………………………………………………………… 27 15.d.5 COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ………………… 29 15.d.6 COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM …………………………………. 31 15.d.7& OPERATIONAL ALERTS ……………………………………………………… 34 15.d.8 15.d.9 HAZARD IDENTIFICATION TRAINING …………………………………….. 35 15.e DRILLING MONITORING …………………………………………………….. 36 15.f RECORDS ………………………………………………………………………. 38 15.g INCIDENT TRACKING REPORT ……………………………….…………….. 39 16.a&b OIL SPILL TRAINING ………………………………………………………….. 40 17. OIL SPILL EXERCISES ………………………………………………………… 43 17.a SIMULATED NOTIFICATION ………………………………………………… 43 i | Page Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report 04.02.15 Annual Report Section Section Name Page 17.b ACTUAL NOTIFICATION …………………………………………………….. 44 17.c OPERATOR TABLE-TOP EXERCISES ………………………………………. 45 17.d WEEKLY EMERGENCY RESPONSE DRILLS ………………………………. 47 17.e COORDINATE WITH OPERATORS ………………………………………..… 48 18. OIL SPILL RESPONSE PLANS (“OSRP”) .………………………………..….. 49 19. BEST PRACTICES ……………………………………………………………... 52 19.a COMMUNICATIONS WITH OPERATORS ………………………………..… 52 19.b ALARM SYSTEM SAFETY ………………………………………………….… 54 20. INNOVATION …………………………………………………………………... 55 21. TRANSPARENCY …………………………………………………………….... 58 21.a RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSENT DECREE COMPLIANCE ……………… 58 21.b PUBLIC WEB SITE .……………………………………………………….…… 59 21.c NATIONAL RESPONSE RESOURCE INVENTORY …………………………. 62 22. INDEPENDENT CONSENT DECREE COMPLIANCE AUDITOR …………. 63 23. PROCESS SAFETY ………………………………………………………..…… 66 TRANSOCEAN OFFSHORE DEEPWATER DRILLING INC. 23.a 66 HEALTH, SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD ……………………. 23.b INDEPENDENT PROCESS SAFETY CONSULTANT …………………..….. 67 24-28. APPROVAL OF DELIVERABLES ……………………………………………. 69 29. PERMITS ……………………………………………………………………….. 70 32. NON-COMPLIANCE REPORTS ………………………………………………. 71 ii | Page Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report 04.02.15 Appendices and Attachments Appendix 15.a.1 – Audit Appendix 15.a.1 – SEMS . Attachment 15.a.1-SEMS-2014 Certification Appendix 15.a.2 Appendix 15.b . Attachment 15.b Appendix 15.c.1 . Attachment 15.c.1 Appendix 15.c.2 Appendix 15.d.1 & 2 Appendix 15.d.3 . Attachment 15.d.3 Appendix 15.d.4 . Attachment 15.d.4 Appendix 15.d.5 & 6 Appendix 15.d.7 & 8 Appendix 15.d.9 . Attachment 15.d.9 Appendix 15.e . Attachment 15.e Appendix 15.g Appendix 16.a & b Appendix 17.a . Attachment 17.a Appendix 17.b Appendix 17.c Appendix 17.d Appendix 17.e Appendix 18 & 19.a Appendix 19.b Appendix 20 . Attachment 20 Appendix 21.a Appendix 21.b Appendix 21.c Appendix 23.a Appendix 32 Appendix 33 (2014 Certification) Appendix-Officer's Obligations Certification iii | Page Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report 04.02.15 2014 CONSENT DECREE ANNUAL REPORT A. INTRODUCTION On January 2, 2013, a settlement was entered into between certain affiliates of Transocean (“Transocean”) and the US Department of Justice (“DOJ”) relating to the 2010 Macondo incident. An important part of that settlement is a detailed Consent Decree that describes the terms of the civil settlement and includes the imposition of specific obligations on Transocean for a period of five years from the effective date of the related Performance Plan. Transocean, along with the DOJ and the other government agencies involved (“United States”) understood the importance of having a detailed and substantive Performance Plan that throughout the Consent Decree term could be verified by the United States and Consent Decree Independent Auditor. The terms of the Performance Plan primarily relate to Consent Decree Article VI (Measures to Improve Performance and Prevent Recurrence, Paragraphs 14-23) and became effective January 2, 2014. The Consent Decree, Paragraph 31.a, requires Transocean to prepare and submit an Annual Report by April 2nd of each year after the effective date of the Performance Plan to describe measures taken to comply with each of the requirements of Article VI during the previous year. In addition, Paragraph 31.a describes a number of other Annual Report requirements including the Report must be organized to show the measures taken, the status and whether there were any problems encountered with compliance. The Consent Decree requires that the status of permit applications, operation and maintenance and reports to federal or state agencies be included. These items, if any, are included throughout the Annual Report but do not have a separate section for identification. In addition, the Performance Plan in certain sections references items, lists or summaries required to be included in the Annual Report. Along with Consent Decree Paragraphs 14-23, the Annual Report is to address the remaining Paragraphs under Article VI, Paragraphs 24-28, Approval of Deliverables and Paragraph 29, Permits. Finally, under Article VIII (Reporting), Paragraph 32 requires Transocean to include in the Annual Report a description of any non-compliance and provide an explanation of the likely cause and remedial steps taken or to be taken. Because the Performance Plan and the Annual Report obligations both relate to Article VI, for organizational purposes, the 2014 Annual Report structure is based on the Performance Plan document that was approved on January 2, 2014. That document contains three subsections: “1. Implementation” which sets forth the specific actions that Transocean must undertake; “2. Milestones and Deliverables” which identifies the timeframes and required submissions; and “3. Annual Report” which identifies the information to be included in the Annual Report. Each of the sections required to be addressed in this Annual Report are set forth below. For reference and understanding, the Performance Plan “Implementation” and “Milestones and Deliverables” language is included and is shown in black font. The 2014 Annual Report related information is included in bold blue font. 1 | Page Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report 04.02.15 B. REPORT: MEASURES TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE AND PREVENT REOCCURENCE 14. GENERAL TERMS 14.a. COMPLIANCE AND IMPLEMENTATION 1. Implementation a. As provided in this Performance Plan, Transocean shall implement or cause to be implemented, including through employees, affiliates, or contractors, the injunctive relief requirements imposed in the Consent Decree for all Drilling Operations in Waters of the United States in accordance with the requirements of the Consent Decree, within the deadlines in this Performance Plan. b. Transocean shall continue to implement or cause to be implemented the requirements of the Consent Decree and this Performance Plan for the duration of the Consent Decree. c. Compliance with the requirements of the Consent Decree and this Performance Plan by any one or more of the Transocean affiliates shall satisfy the requirements of the Consent Decree for all the Transocean affiliates. 2. Milestones and Deliverables a. All See “Annual Report” below. 3. 2014 Annual Report Measures Taken: Q.1 – Q.4 This Section of the Consent Decree is the general provision that requires Transocean and its subsidiaries to fully implement the Consent Decree and Performance Plan obligations for all “Drilling Operations” in the “Waters of the United States,” as defined in the Consent Decree. Therefore the measures taken during each quarter are all those described in Sections 14.b through 23 below, in addition to other obligations required under other Sections of the Consent Decree and Performance Plan that were met during the quarter. Status and Summary (if required): Transocean is continuing its focus on fully implementing the Consent Decree and Performance Plan obligations. The company has a team of professionals (the “Obligations Team”) focused on the effort and numerous processes in place to ensure compliance. There has been a special focus on the key operations positions of Rig Managers and Offshore Installation Managers (“OIMs”). Specific obligation summaries with highlighted priorities have been developed for those positions and there are ongoing communications between the Obligations Team and the individuals in these roles. In addition, the Obligations Team has built a close working relationship with the company personnel in key roles in functions such as Health, Safety and Environmental (“HSE”), Training and 2 | Page Consent Decree 2014 Annual Report 04.02.15 Subsea Engineering. The Obligations Team has also built extensive databases to track their compliance efforts and new tracking requirements were added to the existing electronic global management system (“GMS”), maintenance and training tracking systems. Importantly, the Obligations
Recommended publications
  • View Annual Report
    and 3/16/09 8:11 PM Proxy Statement 2008 Report Annual on BUILDING Strength Transocean Ltd. • PROXY STATEMENT AND 2008 ANNUAL REPORT www.deepwater.com Transocean 2008 Annual Report.indd 1 CONTENTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS CORPORATE INFORMATION ROBERT E. ROSE Registered Address BNY Mellon Shareowner Services SHAREHOLDERS’ LETTER Chairman Transocean Ltd. P.O.Box 358015 Transocean Ltd. c/o Reichlin & Hess Rechtsanwälte Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8015 NOTICE OF 2009 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING AND PROXY SATEMENT Hofstrasse 1A Or 480 Washington Boulevard, Jersey City, NJ 07310-1900 ROBERT L. LONG CH-6300 1-877-397-7229 Chief Executive Officer Zug, Switzerland 1-201-680-6578 (for callers outside the United States) 2008 ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS Transocean Ltd. Phone: +41 22 930 9000 Internet address: www.bnymellon.com/shareowner/isd W. RICHARD ANDERSON E-mail Address: [email protected] ABOUT TRANSOCEAN LTD. Former President and Chief Executive Officer Prime Natural Resources, Inc. Direct Purchase Plan We are the world’s largest offshore drilling contractor and the leading provider of drilling management services THOMAS W. CASON The Bank of New York, the Transfer Agent for Transocean Ltd., offers a Direct Former Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer worldwide. With a fleet of 136 mobile offshore drilling units, plus 10 ultra-deepwater units nearing, under or Purchase and Sale Plan for the shares of Transocean Ltd. called BuyDirect. For Baker Hughes Incorporated more information on BuyDirect, including a complete enrollment packages, please contracted for construction, our fleet is considered one of the most modern and versatile in the world due to contact the Bank of New York at 1.877.397.7229 or 1-212-815-3700 for callers RICHARD L.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulate Our 2018 Champions Safet
    FIRST EXCELLENCE: CONGRATULATE OUR THE 4 2018 CHAMPIONS PURSUITA Performance Publication for a Boundless Company / August 2018 SAFETY: NORTH SEA RIGS GET 2017 IADC 8 SAFETY AWARD NEWS: TRANSOCEAN AND 9 EQUINOR SIGN MFA COMMUNITY: TRANSOCEAN 13 CARES PEOPLE: DUANGKAMON AOR POONTHANAVIT IS 18 BEYOND BOUNDLESS PURSUIT ISSUE 2.2 1 / 20 clearance before we can collect. Despite these wins, we still have 31 significant lawsuits around the world in various stages, and the aggregate amount + EXECUTIVE COLUMN in dispute in those lawsuits is approximately $2 billion. We will continue advancing Transocean’s /2 interests aggressively and intelligently. /3 Legal: Service-Focused & Minimize cost. There’s no way we can staff all of these big cases — or all of our other projects Solutions-Oriented — internally, so we partner with law firms around the world for support. Law firms can be expensive, though, so it’s our job to make sure we get the best service on the best terms. In 2016 and 2017, we renegotiated the terms with all of our large firms and most of the rest of our firms. As a result, approximately 83% of the legal fees we pay are either at discounted hourly rates or under alternative billing arrangements, such as flat fees and contingent fees where the firm is only paid upon a successful outcome. Penha Lopes (left) and Ana Forman meet Brady in Brazil. Secure a competitive edge in strategic matters. Acquisitions and divestitures feature significant Legal also represents Transocean in different litigation and regulatory risks, and it’s our job to industry associations, including the International make sure we achieve our strategic goals without Association of Drilling Contractors (IADC), the taking on unnecessary exposure to those risks.
    [Show full text]
  • The Information Redacted Contains Names F
    15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS employees and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.5 and 15.d.6 are identical and have been combined into one document) INFORMATION REDACTED IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT NON-CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The information redacted contains names for each employee holding a position identified in Sections 15.d.5 (““CAMS Employees”) and 15.d.6 (““CAP Employees”) of the Consent Decree as of the date of submission, January 2014. 15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (redacted) 15.d.5(CD) List of CAMS employees and 15.d.6(CD) List of CAP employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.5 and 15.d.6 are identical and have been combined into one document) Last Name First Name Current Assignment Position Discoverer Enterprise Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Driller GSF Development Driller I Driller Discoverer India Dynamic Pos Oper II Deepwater Pathfinder Subsea Spvr GSF Development Driller I Dynamic Pos Oper II Discoverer Clear Leader Dynamic Pos Oper III GSF Development Driller II Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer Spirit Subsea Spvr Discoverer Spirit Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Sr Subsea Spvr (MUX) NAM Development Driller III Driller Discoverer Inspiration Driller Discoverer Inspiration Dynamic Pos Oper II Discoverer India Dynamic Pos Oper II GSF C. R. Luigs Driller Development Driller III Sr Subsea Spvr (MUX) NAM Deepwater Pathfinder Subsea Spvr INFORMATION Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer
    [Show full text]
  • The Information Redacted Contains Names F
    15.d.1(CD) List of Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.1 and 15.d.3 Are identical and have been combined into one document) INFORMATION REDACTED IN THE FOLLOWING REPORT NON-CONFIDENTIAL SUMMARY OF INFORMATION: The information redacted contains names for each employee holding a position identified in Sections 15.d.1 (“Well Control Personnel”) and 15.d.3 (“Designated Employees”) of the Consent Decree as of the date of submission, January 2014. VERSION REDACTED 15.d.1(CD) Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (redacted) 15.d.1(CD) List of Well Control Personnel and 15.d.3(CD) Designated Employees 01.24.14 (Note the list of employees required under 15.d.1 and 15.d.3 are identical and have been combined into one document) Last Name First Name Current Assignment Position Discoverer Deep Seas Toolpusher Discoverer Enterprise Driller Discoverer Deep Seas Driller GSF Development Driller I Driller Deepwater Champion Toolpusher Discoverer Spirit Toolpusher Development Driller III Sr Toolpusher Deepwater Pathfinder Toolpusher Deepwater Pathfinder Toolpusher GSF Development Driller II Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Driller Discoverer Spirit Driller Development Driller III Driller Discoverer Inspiration Toolpusher Discoverer Inspiration Driller Discoverer Clear Leader Sr Toolpusher GSF C. R. Luigs Driller Deepwater Nautilus Toolpusher Discoverer Enterprise OIM Offshore Inst Mgr Discoverer Clear Leader VERSIONDriller INFORMATION GSF C. R. Luigs
    [Show full text]
  • Unified Command Open House
    The Shrimp e-Advocate The Southern Shrimp Alliance (SSA) is a non-profit alliance of members of the U.S. shrimp industry in eight states committed to preventing the continued deterioration of America's shrimp industry and to ensuring the industry's future viability. SSA serves as the national voice for the shrimp fishermen and processors in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Texas. Gulf Coast Response JUNE 29, 2010 Quick Links Gulf Coast Response ‐ Update SSA Website OPEN HOUSE Board of Directors The Unified Area Command has set up a series of open house events for citizens to learn more about the response to the Gulf oil spill. Booths will be arranged in Florida: each venue so that people can walk around and ask questions of each government/agency representative. Information for each Open House for this Sal Versaggi [email protected] week is below. There is also a discussion on 'Expanding the Environmental Conversation' with EPA Administration (please see the attached document for Chris Gala [email protected] more details). Georgia: June 29 (TODAY) New Iberia, 6:00‐8:00 pm Elaine Knight [email protected] Caneview Elementary School Mike Dubberly [email protected] 4110 Loreauville Road Alabama: New Iberia, LA 70563 Mickey Johnson [email protected] July 1 (Thursday) Rosa Zirlott [email protected] Houma Civic Center, 6:00‐8:00 pm Houma Terrebonne Civic Center Mississippi: 346 Civic Center Boulevard Steve Bosarge Houma, Louisiana 70360 [email protected] Tommy Schultz [email protected] July 1 (Thursday) 6:00‐8:00 pm Louisiana: Biloxi Community Center James Blanchard 591 Howard Ave [email protected] Biloxi, MS 39530 Cathy Blanchard [email protected] m July 2 (Friday) ‐ Special Conversation with EPA Texas: Administrator Lisa P.
    [Show full text]
  • Deepwater Disaster: How the Oil Spill Estimates Got It Wrong
    Best guess versus worst case Deepwater disaster: how the oil spill estimates got it wrong “There is no crude emanating from that riser.” Then the official estimate was 1000 barrels a day, then 5000. The true figure was 58 000 barrels of oil a day leaking into the Gulf of Mexico. Why did the authorities so consistently underestimate the flow from the Deepwater disaster, and what damage did those underestimates do? Ian MacDonald reveals the smoking gun behind BP’s erroneous statistics. On April 20th, 2010, the explosion and sinking of a consequential variable in the ongoing emergency: the semi-submersible drilling rig called Deepwater Horizon discharge rate of oil: that is, the number of barrels of oil killed 11 people and initiated a furious eruption of oil per day gushing into the ocean far below the surface. and gas from BP’s Macando well, which was located Official reports on the release and discharge rates in 1500 m of water 75 km southeast of Grand Island, were issued by authorities of the Unified Command, Louisiana. The discharge was virtually unabated for which was an often uneasy alliance between BP and 84 days until a steel cap was installed and successfully the US government represented by no less than four closed, staunching the flow completely, on 15th July. cabinet-level departments (of Commerce, Energy, Emergency operations continued around the clock to Homeland Security, and the Interior). Unfortunately, it drill a second, intercepting, shaft and install a final plug took these authorities a very long time to get the rate into the bottom of the blown-out well.
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon
    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 14021 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater * Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, * MDL 2179 on April 20, 2010, * * * SECTION J This Document Applies To: * * No. 10-2771, In re: The Complaint and Petition * JUDGE BARBIER of Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, et al. * * and * MAG. JUDGE SHUSHAN * No. 10-4536, United States of America v. BP * Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. * ——————————————————————————————————————— FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PHASE TWO TRIAL Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-SS Document 14021 Filed 01/15/15 Page 2 of 44 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the Court enters these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law relative to the Phase Two trial. If any finding is in truth a conclusion of law or any conclusion stated is in truth a finding of fact, it shall be deemed so, labels notwithstanding. CONTENTS I. Introduction and Procedural History ................................................................................. 3 II. Source Control Segment ....................................................................................................... 5 A. Parties to the Source Control Segment ............................................................................. 5 B. Stipulated Facts; Timeline of Source Control Events ...................................................... 6 i. Terms and Definitions.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the EASTERN DISTRICT of LOUISIANA in Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater Horizon
    Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-DPC Document 14021 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 44 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig “Deepwater * Horizon” in the Gulf of Mexico, * MDL 2179 on April 20, 2010, * * * SECTION J This Document Applies To: * * No. 10-2771, In re: The Complaint and Petition * JUDGE BARBIER of Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, et al. * * and * MAG. JUDGE SHUSHAN * No. 10-4536, United States of America v. BP * Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. * ——————————————————————————————————————— FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PHASE TWO TRIAL Case 2:10-md-02179-CJB-DPC Document 14021 Filed 01/15/15 Page 2 of 44 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a), the Court enters these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law relative to the Phase Two trial. If any finding is in truth a conclusion of law or any conclusion stated is in truth a finding of fact, it shall be deemed so, labels notwithstanding. CONTENTS I. Introduction and Procedural History ................................................................................. 3 II. Source Control Segment ....................................................................................................... 5 A. Parties to the Source Control Segment ............................................................................. 5 B. Stipulated Facts; Timeline of Source Control Events ...................................................... 6 i. Terms and Definitions.....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AR-4 Ultra-Deepwater Floaters
    Water Drilling Contracted Year depth depth location or entered capacity capacity standby Rig category and name Type service (in feet) (in feet) status Ultra-deepwater floaters (31) Deepwater Poseidon (a) (b) (c) (d) Drillship 2018 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Deepwater Pontus (a) (b) (c) (d) Drillship 2017 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Deepwater Conqueror (a) (b) (c) (d) Drillship 2016 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Deepwater Proteus (a) (b) (c) (d) Drillship 2016 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Deepwater Thalassa (a) (b) (c) (d) Drillship 2016 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Ocean Rig Apollo (a) (b) Drillship 2015 12,000 40,000 Stacked Ocean Rig Athena (a) (b) Drillship 2014 12,000 40,000 Stacked Deepwater Asgard (a) (b) (d) Drillship 2014 12,000 40,000 Mexico Gulf Deepwater Invictus (a) (b) (d) Drillship 2014 12,000 40,000 Trinidad Ocean Rig Skyros (a) (b) Drillship 2013 12,000 40,000 Angola Ocean Rig Mylos (a) (b) Drillship 2013 12,000 40,000 Stacked Deepwater Champion (a) (b) Drillship 2011 12,000 40,000 Stacked Ocean Rig Corcovado (a) (b) Drillship 2011 10,000 35,000 Idle Ocean Rig Mykonos (a) (b) Drillship 2011 10,000 35,000 Idle Ocean Rig Poseidon (a) (b) Drillship 2011 10,000 35,000 Angola Ocean Rig Olympia (a) (b) Drillship 2011 10,000 35,000 Stacked Discoverer India (a) (b) (e) Drillship 2010 12,000 40,000 Ivory Coast Discoverer Luanda (a) (b) (e) Drillship 2010 7,500 40,000 Stacked Dhirubhai Deepwater KG2 (a) Drillship 2010 12,000 35,000 China Discoverer Inspiration (a) (b) (d) (e) Drillship 2010 12,000 40,000 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AR-5 High-Specification Floaters
    High-Specification Floaters (48) Year Water Drilling entered depth depth service/ capacity capacity Name Type upgraded (a) (in feet) (in feet) Location Ultra-Deepwater Floaters (27) Discoverer Clear Leader (b) (c) (d) HSD 2009 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Discoverer Americas (b) (c) (d) (e) HSD 2009 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Discoverer Inspiration (b) (c) (d) (e) HSD 2010 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Deepwater Champion (b) (c) (e) HSD 2011 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Petrobras 10000 (b) (c) HSD 2009 12,000 37,500 Brazil Dhirubhai Deepwater KG1 (b) (e) HSD 2009 12,000 35,000 India Dhirubhai Deepwater KG2 (b) (e) HSD 2010 12,000 35,000 India Discoverer India (b) (c) (d) HSD 2010 12,000 40,000 U.S. Gulf Discoverer Deep Seas (b) (c) (d) HSD 2001 10,000 35,000 U.S. Gulf Discoverer Enterprise (b) (c) (d) HSD 1999 10,000 35,000 U.S. Gulf Discoverer Spirit (b) (c) (d) HSD 2000 10,000 35,000 U.S. Gulf GSF C.R. Luigs (b) HSD 2000 10,000 35,000 U.S. Gulf GSF Jack Ryan (b) HSD 2000 10,000 35,000 Nigeria Deepwater Discovery (b) HSD 2000 10,000 30,000 Brazil Deepwater Frontier (b) HSD 1999 10,000 30,000 Australia Deepwater Millennium (b) HSD 1999 10,000 30,000 Kenya Deepwater Pathfinder (b) HSD 1998 10,000 30,000 U.S. Gulf Deepwater Expedition (b) HSD 1999 8,500 30,000 Saudi Arabia Cajun Express (b) (f) HSS 2001 8,500 35,000 Brazil Deepwater Nautilus (g) HSS 2000 8,000 30,000 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transocean Ltd. Provides Quarterly Fleet Status Report
    Transocean Ltd. Provides Quarterly Fleet Status Report STEINHAUSEN, Switzerland—February 14, 2020—Transocean Ltd. (NYSE: RIG) today issued a quarterly Fleet Status Report that provides the current status of, and contract information for, the company’s fleet of offshore drilling rigs. Since its last Fleet Status Report in October, Transocean added approximately $366 million in contract backlog, bringing total backlog to $10.2 billion. This quarter’s report includes the following new contracts: Leiv Eiriksson. – Awarded a two-well contract, plus three one-well options in Norway; Discoverer Inspiration – Awarded a three-well contract, plus three one-well options in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico; Deepwater Asgard – Awarded an estimated 200-day contract, plus four 74-day options in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico; Development Driller III – Awarded a one-year contract in Trinidad; Dhirubhai Deepwater KG2 – Awarded a 180-day contract, plus three one-well options in Myanmar; Leiv Eiriksson – Awarded a one-well contract in Norway; Deepwater Invictus – Customer exercised a one-year option in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico; Transocean Norge – Customer exercised two one-well options in Norway; Deepwater Nautilus – Customer exercised 180-day option in Malaysia; and Deepwater Asgard – Customer exercised a 74-day option in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The report can be accessed on the company’s website: www.deepwater.com. About Transocean Transocean is a leading international provider of offshore contract drilling services for oil and gas wells. The company specializes in technically demanding sectors of the global offshore drilling business with a particular focus on deepwater and harsh environment drilling services, and believes that it operates the highest specification floating offshore drilling fleet in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight Hearing Committee
    OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OIL AND GAS STRATEGY AND IMPLICATIONS OF THE DEEPWATER HORIZON RIG EXPLOSION: PARTS 1 AND 2 OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION Wednesday and Thursday, May 26 and 27, 2010 Serial No. 111-54 Printed for the use of the Committee on Natural Resources ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html or Committee address: http://resourcescommittee.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 56-675 PDF WASHINGTON : 2010 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 12:23 Aug 13, 2010 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 L:\DOCS\56675MRG.TXT Hresour1 PsN: KATHY COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES NICK J. RAHALL, II, West Virginia, Chairman DOC HASTINGS, Washington, Ranking Republican Member Dale E. Kildee, Michigan Don Young, Alaska Eni F.H. Faleomavaega, American Samoa Elton Gallegly, California Frank Pallone, Jr., New Jersey John J. Duncan, Jr., Tennessee Grace F. Napolitano, California Jeff Flake, Arizona Rush D. Holt, New Jersey Henry E. Brown, Jr., South Carolina Rau´ l M. Grijalva, Arizona Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Washington Madeleine Z. Bordallo, Guam Louie Gohmert, Texas Jim Costa, California Rob Bishop, Utah Dan Boren, Oklahoma Bill Shuster, Pennsylvania Gregorio Sablan, Northern Marianas Doug Lamborn, Colorado Martin T. Heinrich, New Mexico Adrian Smith, Nebraska Ben Ray Luja´n, New Mexico Robert J.
    [Show full text]