DOCSLIB.ORG

Ua-Physics-Apr-Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ua-Physics-Apr-Report Physics Department Self-Study Report for the Academic Program Review Elliott Cheu, Kenneth Johns, Sumit Mazumdar, Ina Sarcevic, Charles Stafford, Bira van Kolck, Charles Wolgemuth April 6, 2018 Abstract This report contains material for the Academic Program Review of the physics department at the University of Arizona. The report covers the years from 2011-2017. Contents A Self Study Summary 10 B Unit Description and Goals 12 B.1 Department Mission and Alignment with the University of Arizona (UA) Strategic Plan... 12 B.2 Department Strategic Plan..................................... 12 B.2.1 Undergraduate and Graduate Student Engagement.................... 12 B.2.2 Faculty Hiring and Innovation............................... 15 C Unit History 17 C.1 Major Changes That Have Occurred Since the Last Academic Program Review (APR) (2011) 17 C.2 Recommendations from the Previous APR and Changes Made in Response........... 18 D Academic Quality 25 D.1 External Rankings.......................................... 25 D.2 Internal Rankings........................................... 26 D.3 Unit Peer Institutions........................................ 27 E Faculty 32 1 E.1 Research................................................ 32 E.2 External Funding........................................... 38 E.3 Participation in the Academic Profession.............................. 38 E.4 Teaching................................................ 43 E.5 Planned Faculty Hires........................................ 45 E.6 Compensation............................................. 46 E.7 Diversity................................................ 47 E.8 Biographical Sketches........................................ 47 F Unit Administration 48 G Unit Resources 50 G.1 Existing Unit Resources....................................... 50 G.2 Resource Needs............................................ 52 H Undergraduate Program 53 H.1 Overview............................................... 53 H.2 General Education.......................................... 53 H.3 Undergraduate Programs...................................... 54 H.4 Undergraduate Students....................................... 56 H.5 Learning Outcomes Assessment................................... 60 H.5.1 Expected Student Learning Outcomes........................... 60 H.5.2 Assessment Activities.................................... 60 H.5.3 Assessment Plan and Findings............................... 61 H.5.4 Changes Made in Response to Findings.......................... 61 I Graduate Program 62 I.1 Overview............................................... 62 I.2 Curriculum and Courses....................................... 62 I.3 Graduate Students.......................................... 65 I.4 Learning Outcomes Assessment................................... 68 2 I.4.1 Expected Student Learning Outcomes........................... 68 I.4.2 Assessment Activities.................................... 68 I.4.3 Assessment Plan and Findings............................... 69 I.4.4 Changes Made in Response to Findings.......................... 69 I.5 Post-Doctoral Fellows........................................ 70 J Academic Outreach 71 K Collaboration with Other Units 73 K.1 Collaborations in Research...................................... 73 L Faculty Planning 75 L.1 Faculty's Collective View of the Program's Future........................ 75 L.1.1 Student Engagement..................................... 75 L.1.2 Faculty Hiring and Innovation............................... 76 Appendices 77 A Peer Teaching Evaluation 77 B TCE Teaching Evaluations 80 C APR Teaching Rubric 109 D Faculty CV's 111 E Committees 170 F Academic Advisor Duties 172 G PHYS 200 Syllabus 174 H B.S. Requirements 179 I B.A. Requirements 181 3 J Proposed B.S. in Applied Physics Degree Requirements 183 K PHYS 382 Creative Project 188 L Senior Exit Survey 190 M Undergraduate Research Symposium Survey for Faculty 195 N Undergraduate Curriculum Map 197 O Ph.D. Requirements 201 P Professional Science Masters in Medical Physics Requirements 205 Q Graduate Curriculum Map 208 R Unit Profile Data 211 4 List of Tables 1 Physics department quality metrics used by the College of Science (COS)........... 26 2 Faculty awarded NSF, DOE or other young faculty awards since 2000............. 26 3 Faculty who have receivedUA research awards since 2000.................... 27 4 Faculty who have received national or international research awards since 2000........ 27 5 Comparison of statistics reflecting the undergraduate program atUA and peer departments. 28 6 Comparison of statistics reflecting the graduate program atUA and peer departments.... 28 7 Comparison of statistics reflecting the research program atUA and peer departments.... 28 8 List of tenured and tenure-track physics faculty.......................... 33 9 Faculty awards since 2010...................................... 34 10 Current grants and contracts. In the case of external PIs or subcontracts, the awarded in- stitution is listed under \Source", \PI" denotes the responsible local faculty member, and \Amount" refers to the physics department share......................... 39 11 Pending grants............................................ 40 12 Granted patents since 2010..................................... 40 13 Pending patents............................................ 40 14 Faculty leadership in professional societies since 2010....................... 40 15 Faculty participation in conference organization.......................... 41 16 Faculty editorial service since 2010................................. 42 17 Faculty participation in funding panels since 2010......................... 42 18 Faculty participation in advising boards and committees since 2010............... 43 19 Physics faculty teaching awards since 2009............................. 44 20 Summary of physics faculty arrivals and departures since the last APR............. 45 21 Physics faculty hires since the previous APR........................... 45 22 Physics faculty departures...................................... 46 23 Faculty tenure decisions and promotions.............................. 46 24 Academic year compensation comparison with peer institutions................. 46 25 Percentages of physics faculty by gender and race/ethnicity................... 47 26 List of classified staff in the department.............................. 49 5 27 Courses with course fees....................................... 51 28 Writing requirements in PHYS 200................................. 53 29 Opportunities for student learning in PHYS 200......................... 54 30 Enrolled physics majors....................................... 54 31 Completed physics majors...................................... 54 32 Seven year average of freshman counts and average SAT scores in physics, the COS, and the UA................................................... 56 33 Five year average (2012-2016) of the fraction of majors in the Honors program in the physics department, the COS, and theUA.................................. 57 34 Seven year average of the years to degree for students in physics, the COS, and theUA.... 57 35 Seven year average GPA of completed physics majors, majors in the COS, and all majors at theUA................................................. 57 36 Gender composition of undergraduate physics majors....................... 58 37 Race/ethnicity composition of undergraduate physics majors.................. 58 38 Honors courses offered in the physics department. Courses marked with are those that are co-convened with the non-honors version of the course.......................∗ 59 39 Enrolled and first year Ph.D. students and Professional Science Masters (PSM) students... 63 40 Completed Ph.D. and PSM degrees................................. 63 41 Six and eight year Ph.D. completion rates for three five-year cohorts.............. 63 42 Women in the graduate Ph.D. program.............................. 65 43 Ethnic composition of the graduate Ph.D. program........................ 66 44 Job placements of Ph.D. students - 2010-2013........................... 67 45 Job placements of Ph.D. students - 2014-2017........................... 68 46 Positions taken by postdocs immediately afterUA........................ 70 6 Abbreviations Used in this Report AA Academic Advisor. 50, 59 ABOR Arizona Board of Regents. 25, 27 ABR American Board of Radiology. 75 AFOSR Air Force Office of Science Research. 32, 34, 35, 38, 39 AIP American Institute of Physics. 54, 57 AMO Atomic, Molecular, and Optical physics. 15, 16, 19{21, 25, 28, 33, 35, 45, 64, 75 AMS Accelerator Mass Spectrometer. 37 APR Academic Program Review.1,5, 10, 11, 17, 45, 48, 72 APS American Physical Society. 32, 67, 76 ARO Army Research Office. 35, 38{40 ASO Academic Support Office. 48{50 ASU Arizona State University. 35 BPP Biological Physics Program. 35, 74 CAMPEP Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs. 24, 62 CAS Chinese Academy of Sciences. 32, 34 CBC Chemistry and Biochemistry. 19 CERN European Center for Nuclear Research. 15, 37 CIP Classification of Instructional Programs. 53, 62 CM Condensed Matter physics. 15, 16, 45 COOS College of Optical Sciences. 10, 14, 19, 74, 75 COS College of Science.5,6, 10, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 26, 27, 32, 34, 43, 48{51, 56, 57, 72, 73, 77 CUWiP Conferences for Women in Physics. 20 D2L Desire2Learn. 56, 64 DARPA Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. 35, 40 DDM Dynamical Dark Matter. 37 DES Dark Energy Survey. 36 DESC Dark Energy Science Collaboration.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1301.0017V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 23 Dec 2012 M L 03 in Ta.20;Kr Ta.20;Kurk 2007; Most the the Al
    Draft version June 14, 2018 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 12/16/11 HIGH-Z QUASARS IN THE RH = CT UNIVERSE Fulvio Melia† Key Laboratory of Dark Matter and Space Astronomy, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 210008 Nanjing, China and Department of Physics, The Applied Math Program, and Department of Astronomy, The University of Arizona, AZ 85721, USA †John Woodruff Simpson Fellow. E-mail: [email protected] Draft version June 14, 2018 ABSTRACT 9 One cannot understand the early appearance of 10 M⊙ supermassive black holes without invoking anomalously high accretion rates or the creation of exotically massive seeds, neither of which is seen in the local Universe. Recent observations have compounded this problem by demonstrating that most, if not all, of the high-z quasars appear to be accreting at the Eddington limit. In the context of ΛCDM, the only viable alternative now appears to be the assemblage of supermassive black holes via mergers, as long as the seeds started forming at redshifts > 40, but ceased being created by z ∼ 20−30. In this paper, we show that, whereas the high-z quasars may be difficult to explain within the framework of the standard model, they can instead be interpreted much more sensibly in the context of the Rh = ct Universe. In this cosmology, 5 − 20 M⊙ seeds produced after the onset of re-ionization (at z . 15) 9 could have easily grown to M & 10 M⊙ by z & 6, merely by accreting at the standard Eddington rate. Keywords: cosmology: observations, theory; dark ages; reionization; early universe; quasars: general 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Driver for Attosecond and Laser-Plasma Physics
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Scientific Reports. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Rivas, D E., Borot, A., Cardenas, D E., Marcus, G., Gu, X. et al. (2017) Next Generation Driver for Attosecond and Laser-plasma Physics. Scientific Reports, 7: 5224 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05082-w Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-137941 www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Next Generation Driver for Attosecond and Laser-plasma Physics Received: 16 March 2017 D. E. Rivas 1,2,3, A. Borot1,4, D. E. Cardenas1,2, G. Marcus1,5, X. Gu 1, D. Herrmann1, J. Xu1,6, Accepted: 23 May 2017 J. Tan1, D. Kormin1,2, G. Ma 1,6,7, W. Dallari1, G. D. Tsakiris1, I. B. Földes8, S.-w. Chou1,2, Published: xx xx xxxx M. Weidman1, B. Bergues1, T. Wittmann1, H. Schröder1, P. Tzallas9, D. Charalambidis9, O. Razskazovskaya1,2, V. Pervak2, F. Krausz1,2 & L. Veisz 1,10 The observation and manipulation of electron dynamics in matter call for attosecond light pulses, routinely available from high-order harmonic generation driven by few-femtosecond lasers. However, the energy limitation of these lasers supports only weak sources and correspondingly linear attosecond studies. Here we report on an optical parametric synthesizer designed for nonlinear attosecond optics and relativistic laser-plasma physics. This synthesizer uniquely combines ultra-relativistic focused intensities of about 1020 W/cm2 with a pulse duration of sub-two carrier-wave cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • Cracking the Einstein Code: Relativity and the Birth of Black Hole Physics, with an Afterword by Roy Kerr / Fulvio Melia
    CRA C K I N G T H E E INSTEIN CODE @SZObWdWbgO\RbVS0W`bV]T0ZOQY6]ZS>VgaWQa eWbVO\/TbS`e]`RPg@]gS`` fulvio melia The University of Chicago Press chicago and london fulvio melia is a professor in the departments of physics and astronomy at the University of Arizona. He is the author of The Galactic Supermassive Black Hole; The Black Hole at the Center of Our Galaxy; The Edge of Infinity; and Electrodynamics, and he is series editor of the book series Theoretical Astrophysics published by the University of Chicago Press. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago 60637 The University of Chicago Press, Ltd., London © 2009 by The University of Chicago All rights reserved. Published 2009 Printed in the United States of America 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 09 1 2 3 4 5 isbn-13: 978-0-226-51951-7 (cloth) isbn-10: 0-226-51951-1 (cloth) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Melia, Fulvio. Cracking the Einstein code: relativity and the birth of black hole physics, with an afterword by Roy Kerr / Fulvio Melia. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn-13: 978-0-226-51951-7 (cloth: alk. paper) isbn-10: 0-226-51951-1 (cloth: alk. paper) 1. Einstein field equations. 2. Kerr, R. P. (Roy P.). 3. Kerr black holes—Mathematical models. 4. Black holes (Astronomy)—Mathematical models. I. Title. qc173.6.m434 2009 530.11—dc22 2008044006 To natalina panaia and cesare melia, in loving memory CONTENTS preface ix 1 Einstein’s Code 1 2 Space and Time 5 3 Gravity 15 4 Four Pillars and a Prayer 24 5 An Unbreakable Code 39 6 Roy Kerr 54 7 The Kerr Solution 69 8 Black Hole 82 9 The Tower 100 10 New Zealand 105 11 Kerr in the Cosmos 111 12 Future Breakthrough 121 afterword 125 references 129 index 133 PREFACE Something quite remarkable arrived in my mail during the summer of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Fulvio Melia: High-Energy Astrophysics Is Published by Princeton University Press and Copyrighted, © 2009, by Princeton University Press
    COPYRIGHT NOTICE: Fulvio Melia: High-Energy Astrophysics is published by Princeton University Press and copyrighted, © 2009, by Princeton University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher, except for reading and browsing via the World Wide Web. Users are not permitted to mount this file on any network servers. Follow links for Class Use and other Permissions. For more information send email to: [email protected] Chapter One Introduction and Motivation 1.1 THE FIELD OF HIGH-ENERGY ASTROPHYSICS Compared with optical astronomy, which traces its foundations to prehistoric times,1 the field of high-energy astrophysics is a relatively new science, dealing with astro­ nomical sources and phenomena largely discovered since the advent of space-based instrumentation.2 Ironically, however, the earliest signs of high-energy activity from space appeared in laboratory equipment on the ground, and were not recognized as extraterrestrial for many years. Physicists had noted since about 1900 that some unknown ionizing radiation had to be present near Earth’s surface, from the manner in which the leaves of an electroscope always came together, presumably as a result of a gradual discharging. By 1912, Victor Hess (1883–1964) had made several manned balloon ascents to measure the ionization of the atmosphere as a function of altitude, making the surprising discovery3 that the average ionization above ∼1.5 km increased relative to that at sea level. By demonstrating in this manner that the source of the ionizing radiation—named cosmic rays by Robert Millikan (1868–1953) in 1925—must therefore be extraterrestrial, Hess opened up the frontier of high-energy astrophysics and was eventually awarded the Nobel prize in physics in 1936.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in Court
    www.nature.com/nature Vol 464 | Issue no. 7287 | 18 March 2010 Science in court Academics are too often at loggerheads with forensic scientists. A new framework for certification, accreditation and research could help to heal the breach. o the millions of people who watch television dramas such as face more legal challenges to their results as the academic critiques CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, forensic science is an unerring mount. And judges will increasingly find themselves refereeing Tguide to ferreting out the guilty and exonerating the inno- arguments over arcane new technologies and trying to rule on the cent. It is a robust, high-tech methodology that has all the preci- admissibility of the evidence they produce — a struggle that can sion, rigour and, yes, glamour of science at its best. lead to a body of inconsistent and sometimes ill-advised case law, The reality is rather different. Forensics has developed largely which muddies the picture further. in isolation from academic science, and has been shaped more A welcome approach to mend- by the practical needs of the criminal-justice system than by the ing this rift between communities is “National leadership canons of peer-reviewed research. This difference in perspective offered in a report last year from the is particularly has sometimes led to misunderstanding and even rancour. For US National Academy of Sciences important example, many academics look at techniques such as fingerprint (see go.nature.com/WkDBmY). Its given the highly analysis or hair- and fibre-matching and see a disturbing degree central recommendation is that the interdisciplinary of methodological sloppiness.
    [Show full text]
  • Mohammed Hassan
    Mohammed Hassan Physics Department, University of Arizona Office: +1-520-621-6820 1118 E 4th Street, PO Box 210081, Cell: +1-626-375-3817 Tucson, AZ. 85721-0081 e-mail: [email protected] website: www.hassan.lab.arizona.edu Professional History • Assistant professor of Physics (8/2017-present) University of Arizona Physics Department • Postdoctoral Scholar (9/2013-8/2017) California Institute of Technology, U.S.A. Physical Biology Center for Ultrafast Science and Technology (UST) Department of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering. Faculty Mentor: Prof. Ahmed Zewail • Postdoctoral Scholar (2/2013-9/2013) Max-Planck institute of Quantum Optics (MPQ), Munich, Germany Faculty Mentor: Prof. Dr. Ferenc Krausz and Dr. Eleftherios Goulielmakis Education • Ph.D. in Physics (7/2009-3/2013) Physics Department, Ludwig-Maximillian University of Munich (LMU), Germany Max-Planck institute of Quantum Optics (MPQ), Munich, Germany Ph.D. advisor: Prof. Dr. Ferenc Krausz and Dr. Eleftherios Goulielmakis Thesis Topic: “Synthesis and control of attosecond light transients”. • M.Sc. and Diploma in Laser Interactions with Matter (ranking #1) (9/2004-6/2009) National Institute of Laser Enhanced Science, Cairo University, Egypt. Thesis Topic: “Cancer treatment with naturally synthesized gold nanoparticles”. • B.Sc. in Physical Chemistry (ranking top 5%) (9/1999-9/2013) Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Egypt. Honors and Awards • The shortest pulse of visible light (Guinness World Records -2016) • International Max-Planck Research School fellowship of Advanced Photon Sciences (IMPRS-APS), Germany. (2009-2012) • Maiman Student Paper Competition semi¬finalist. (2012) • Egyptian Scientific Research Academy Master Fellowship for outstanding Graduate student in Science (ASRT-NILES), Egypt. (2004-2007).
    [Show full text]
  • This Letter of Condolences Is Addressed to Theodore's Family, on Behalf of the Community of Greek ERC Grantees. We Are Deeply
    This letter of condolences is addressed to Theodore’s family, on behalf of the community of Greek ERC grantees. We are deeply saddened to hear the passing of Theodore Papazoglou due to covid-19. Theodore was a dear friend and colleague to several of us at FORTH in Crete and a strong advocate of the Greek scientific community. To all of us, the people who were fortunate to be supported by European Research Council (ERC) funding, Theodore was the person to reach out and ask about the process or any issue related to the grant. He was always extremely responsive, helpful, efficient and supportive. For those of us working at FORTH and NCSR Demokritos, Theodore was a friend and a colleague, with whom some have shared scientific discussions and everyday concerns about their research. Even long after his departure to Belgium, Theodore was always eager to visit Greece -and FORTH in particular- and deliver presentations about the various funding schemes of the ERC. All of us benefited from those presentations. For many years, Theodore has served with all his strength and positive energy the vision of the European Research Council, representing our country with dignity. After the passing of Fotis Kafatos, with whom Theodore worked closely since the establishment of the ERC, Theodore also helped keep the memory of Fotis alive. For all the above, his death brings great sadness to the community of Greek ERC grantees. We would like to convey our sincere condolences to his family and friends. He will be sorely missed. Kind regards, Yiota Poirazi, IMBB-FORTH, Greece Iannis Talianidis, IMBB-FORTH, Greece George Chamilos, University of Crete and IMBB-FORTH, Greece George Garinis, University of Crete and IMBB-FORTH, Greece Co-signed by: Vassilis Amiridis, National Observatory of Athens, Greece Thomas Anthopoulos, KAUST and Imperial College London Stylianos E.
    [Show full text]
  • Frontiers in Optics (Fio) 2012/ Laser Science (LS) XXVIII 14-18 October 2012
    Frontiers in Optics (FiO) 2012/ Laser Science (LS) XXVIII 14-18 October 2012 OSA’s Annual Meeting, Frontiers in Optics 2012, wrapped up today Rochester, N.Y., featuring nearly 900 presentations over five days -- 96 years after the Optical Society was founded in this very city. Collocated with the American Physical Society Division of Laser Science’s annual meeting, Laser Science XXVIII, FiO brought together more than 1,700 attendees–a significant increase over last year– covering the latest advances in all areas of optics and photonics – from adaptive optics and optical sensing to silicon photonics and quantum information science. The first day of the conference featured a variety of short courses on timely optics topics, as well as a tribute to Emil Wolf—a well-known optics luminary whose work at the University of Rochester and elsewhere has had a considerable impact on the optics community today. The second day kicked off with a Plenary Session and Awards Ceremony, showcasing presentations from five world-renowned researchers in optics and beyond. OSA’s Frederic Ives Medal Winner Marlan Scully discussed quantum photocells, followed by APS’s Schawlow Award Winner Michael Fayer of Stanford, who covered ultrafast 2D IR vibrational echo spectroscopy. Attendees were then treated to a special guest keynote presentation by Al Goshaw, a Duke University researcher who worked directly on the likely discovery of the Higgs boson particle that rocked the physics world this summer. Rounding out the session were David Williams of the University of Rochester and Paul Corkum of Canada’s NRC and University of Ottawa, who discussed retinal imaging and attosecond photonics, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Energy Astrophysics AA2019-20 C
    High-Energy Astrophysics AA2019-20 C. Vignali The role of high-energy emission • Probe of the innermost regions of compact source (X-ray binaries, AGN, etc) • Solar-system bodies, stars, galaxies (also in their non-active phase) emit X-rays • Cherenkov emission (CTA) is one of the ways to go in the future • Event Horizon Telescope: probing the innermost regions of M87 What you may expect from the course • Far from being complete, impossible to cover all the high-energy astrophysics issues • Overview of emission mechanisms and the way detectors work at high energies • How do sources emit at high energies? Some answers, but many open questions • Books vs. papers: the way to proceed to have a proper view of what’s going on in astrophysics Basic rule: you have a question, you try and find the way (method: data, simulations, theory) to possibly answer that question General on X-ray Astrophysics • J. Trumper & G. Hasinger: "The Universe in X-rays", Books • Frederick D. Seward, Philip A. Charles: "Exploring the X-ray Universe", • Malcolm S. Longair: "High-Energy Astrophysics", + specialistic papers • Fulvio Melia: "High-Energy Astrophysics", − see also arXiv X-ray and Gamma-ray detectors, and data analysis (https://arxiv.org) • Glenn F. Knoll: "Radiation Detectors for X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy", on a daily basis • Hale Bradt: "Astronomy Methods", • S.M. Kahn, P. von Ballmoos, R.A. Sunyaev: "High-Energy Spectroscopic Astrophysics", • G. W. Fraser: "X-ray detectors in astronomy" • Keith Arnaud, Randall Smith, Aneta Siemiginowska: "Handbook of X-ray Astronomy" Emission Processes Slides: useful as • Gabriele Ghisellini: "Radiative processes in high energy astrophysics", ‘threads’ • Hale Bradt: "Astrophysics Processes: The Physics Of Astronomical Phenomena", but please study • S.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Chandra X-Ray Spectroscopic Imaging of Sagittarius A* and the Central Parsec of the Galaxy F
    Physics Physics Research Publications Purdue University Year 2003 Chandra X-ray spectroscopic imaging of Sagittarius A* and the central parsec of the Galaxy F. K. Baganoff, Y. Maeda, M. Morris, M. W. Bautz, W. N. Brandt, W. Cui, J. P. Doty, E. D. Feigelson, G. P. Garmire, S. H. Pravdo, G. R. Ricker, and L. K. Townsley This paper is posted at Purdue e-Pubs. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/physics articles/368 The Astrophysical Journal, 591:891–915, 2003 July 10 # 2003. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. CHANDRA X-RAY SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING OF SAGITTARIUS A* AND THE CENTRAL PARSEC OF THE GALAXY F. K. Baganoff,1 Y. Maeda,2 M. Morris,3 M. W. Bautz,1 W. N. Brandt,4 W. Cui,5 J. P. Doty,1 E. D. Feigelson,4 G. P. Garmire,4 S. H. Pravdo,6 G. R. Ricker,1 and L. K. Townsley4 Received 2001 February 2; accepted 2003 February 28 ABSTRACT We report the results of the first-epoch observation with the ACIS-I instrument on the Chandra X-Ray Observatory of Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), the compact radio source associated with the supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the dynamical center of the Milky Way. This observation produced the first X-ray (0.5– 7 keV) spectroscopic image with arcsecond resolution of the central 170  170 (40 pc  40 pc) of the Galaxy. We report the discovery of an X-ray source, CXOGC J174540.0À290027, coincident with Sgr A* within 0>27 Æ 0>18.
    [Show full text]
  • TESTING 'THE GIRL with X-RAY EYES' Tsunami Conspiracies and Hollow Moons
    TAVRIS ON SEX DIFFERENCES • RANDI ON JOHNNY CARSON • NICKELL ON TURIN SHROUD Skeptical Inquirer THE MAGAZINE FOR SCIENCE A N D R EASON Volume 29, No. 3 • May / June 200 » Testing **, 'The Girl with X-Ray Eyes' •\ •Ray Hyman. Andrew Skolnick Joe Nickell Psychic Swindlers ^H --.T.'.-V*• • Four Myths about Evolution A Librarian's Guide to Critical Thinking Published by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION of Claims off the Paranormal AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-TRANSNATIONAL (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO| • AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy, State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nicked, Senior Research Fellow Massimo Polidoro, Research Fellow Richard Wiseman. Research Fellow Lee Nisbet. Special Projects Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock.* psychologist. York Univ., Toronto Saul Green, Ph.D., biochemist, president of ZOL Loren Pankratz. psychologist. Oregon Health jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Albany, Oregon Consultants, New York. NY Sciences Univ. Marcia Angell. M.D., former editor-in-chief. New Susan Haack. Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts Robert L Park, professor of physics, Univ. of Maryland England Journal of Medicine and Sciences, prof, of philosophy, University John Paulos, mathematician. Temple Univ. Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky of Miami Steven Pinker, cognitive scientist. Harvard Stephen Barrett. M.D., psychiatrist, author. C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist, Univ. of Wales Massimo Polidoro, science writer, author, consumer advocate. Allentown, Pa. David J. Helfand. professor of astronomy, executive director CICAP Italy Willem Betz.
    [Show full text]
  • Eleftherios Goulielmakis
    7th December 2011 - 14:15 FLASH HALL (28c) - Seminar Room Eleftherios Goulielmakis Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, Garching, Germany Sub-optical-cycle light field synthesis: Triggering & clocking the motion of electronics I will discuss recent progress in lightwave technologies [1-4] with focus on the synthesis of sub-optical-cycle light transients [5] and their applications in attosecond science and spectroscopy. With novel types of light-field synthesizers, operating over a spectral bandwidth of more than 1.5 octaves spanning the Near IR, visible and ultraviolet part of the electromagnetic spectrum, we are able to synthesize isolated sub-optical cycle pulses (~ 2 fs duration) to characterize their fields utilizing attosecond streaking [1], and to craft their field shapes on demand. To demonstrate the potential of new technologies for advancing attosecond spectroscopy and control, we exploit such light transients to ionize krypton atoms within a single intense field crest [5]. We probe both ionization as well as the ensuing dynamics in the generated ions by attosecond absorption spectroscopy [6]. We demonstrate, for the first time, an “all-optical” sub-femtosecond trigger of electronic processes which, when combined with EUV attosecond pulses [1], opens the door to attosecond pump - attosecond probe experiments in atoms, molecules and condensed matter. Owing to the sub-fs confinement of ionization, we have successfully triggered highly coherent electron motion in the valence shell of generated ions [7] and have been able to clock this motion with unprecedented accuracy. [1] E. Goulielmakis et al., Science 320, 1614 (2008). [5] A. Wirth et al., Science DOI: 10.1126/science.1210268 (2011) [2] R.
    [Show full text]