DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment Mammal Damage Management in Pennsylvania

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Mammal Damage Management in Pennsylvania ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MAMMAL DAMAGE MANAGEMENT IN PENNSYLVANIA Prepared By: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ANIMAL AND PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE WILDLIFE SERVICES In Consultation With: PENNSYLVANIA GAME COMMISSION PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES PENNSYLVANIA FISH AND BOAT COMMISSION UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE December 2014 SUMMARY Pennsylvania’s wildlife has many positive values and is an important part of life in the state. However, as human populations expand, and land is used for human needs, there is increasing potential for conflicting human/wildlife interactions. This Environmental Assessment (EA) analyzes the potential environmental impacts of alternatives for United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services (WS) involvement in the reduction of conflicts by mammals in Pennsylvania, including damage to property, agricultural and natural resources and risks to human and livestock health and safety. The proposed wildlife damage management activities could be conducted on public and private property in Pennsylvania when the property owner or manager requests assistance and/or when assistance is requested by an appropriate state, federal, tribal or local government agency. The preferred alternative considered in the EA, would be to continue and expand the current Integrated Wildlife Damage Management (IWDM) program in Pennsylvania. The IWDM strategy encompasses the use of practical and effective methods of preventing or reducing damage while minimizing harmful effects of damage management measures on humans, target and non-target species, and the environment. Under this action, WS could provide technical assistance and direct operational assistance including non- lethal and lethal management methods, as described in the WS Decision Model (Slate et al. 1992). When appropriate, non-lethal methods like physical exclusion, cultural practices, habitat modification, repellents or harassment would be recommended and utilized to reduce damage. In other situations, mammals would be removed as humanely as possible using shooting, trapping, snare/cable restraints, aerial shooting from aircraft (feral swine only), or registered euthanasia drugs. In determining the damage management strategy, preference would be given to practical and effective non-lethal methods. However, non-lethal methods may not always be applied as a first response to each damage problem. The most appropriate response could often be a combination of non-lethal and lethal methods, or could include instances where application of lethal methods alone would be the most appropriate strategy. Other alternatives examined in the EA include an alternative in which WS does not become involved in mammal damage management (MDM); and an alternative in which WS is restricted to the use and recommendation of only non-lethal MDM methods (Chapter 3). WS involvement in mammal damage management in Pennsylvania is closely coordinated with the Pennsylvania Game Commission (PGC) and all WS activities are conducted in accordance with applicable state, federal, and local laws and regulations. The EA provides a detailed analysis of the impacts of each alternative on target mammal populations; non-target species including state and federally-listed threatened and endangered species; human health and safety; humaneness of the alternatives used; impacts on stakeholders, including impacts on aesthetic values, and impacts on regulated harvest of mammals. 2 ACRONYMS AMDUCA Animal Medicinal Drug Use Clarification Act APHIS Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service AVMA American Veterinary Medical Association CDC Center for Disease Control CEQ Council on Environmental Quality CFR Code of Federal Regulations DEA Drug Enforcement Administration EA Environmental Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act FAA Federal Aviation Administration FDA Food and Drug Administration FIFRA Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act FMD Foot and Mouth Disease FMIA Federal Meat Inspection Act FY Fiscal Year (October 1, XXXX – September 30, XXXX) HIA Harrisburg International Airport HPS Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome IWDM Integrated Wildlife Damage Management MDM Mammal Damage Management MIS Management Information System MOU Memorandum of Understanding NASS National Agricultural Statistics Service NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA Natural Historic Preservation Act NOA Notices of Availability NWRC National Wildlife Research Center PADCNR Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources PAFBC Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission PDA Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture PDH Pennsylvania Department of Health PGC Pennsylvania Game Commission PNHP Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program SARAA Susquehanna Area Regional Airport Authority SOP Standard Operating Procedure T&E Threatened and Endangered US United States USC United States Code USDA United States Department of Agriculture USFWS United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service WDM Wildlife Damage Management WS Wildlife Services 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 2 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION .......................................................................... 6 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 PURPOSE OF THIS EA .................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 NEED FOR ACTION ...................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Need for Mammal Damage Management to Protect Human Health and Safety ......................................................................................................................10 1.2.2 Need for Mammal Damage Management to Protect Agricultural Resources ..................17 1.2.3 Need for Mammal Damage Management to Protect Property .......................................20 1.2.4 Need for Mammal Damage Management to Protect Natural Resources ........................21 1.2.5 Need to Protect T&E Species ....................................................................................23 1.3 DECISION TO BE MADE ............................................................................................................ 23 1.4 SCOPE OF THIS ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 24 1.4.1 Actions Analyzed .....................................................................................................24 1.4.2 Period for which this EA is Valid ..............................................................................24 1.4.3 Site Specificity .........................................................................................................24 1.4.4 Public Involvement ...................................................................................................25 1.5 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS ......................................... 25 1.6 AUTHORITY AND COMPLIANCE ............................................................................................ 27 1.6.1 Wildlife Services Legislative Authority ......................................................................26 1.6.2 Pennsylvania Game Commission Legislative Authority ..............................................26 1.6.3 Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture .......................................................................... 28 1.6.4 Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission ..............................................................28 1.6.5 Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources……… ...................... 28 1.6.6 Pennsylvania Department of Health ...........................................................................29 1.6.7 Compliance with Federal Laws ..................................................................................27 1.7 PREVIEW OF THE REMAINDER OF THIS EA ........................................................................ 31 CHAPTER 2: ISSUES AND AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................. 31 2.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 31 2.1 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................................... 31 2.2 ISSUES ANALYZED IN DETAIL IN CHAPTER 4 .................................................................... 32 2.2.1 Effects on Target Mammal Species……………………………………….… .................. 32 2.2.2 Effects on Other Wildlife Species, including T&E Species ............................................. 33 2.2.3 Effects of Damage Management Methods on Human Health and Safety ......................... 33 2.2.4 Impacts to Stakeholders, Including Aesthetics ................................................................. 35 2.2.5 Humaneness and Animal Welfare Concerns of Methods Used ........................................ 36 2.3 ISSUES NOT CONSIDERED
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "Pollinator Paradise" Garden at Chatham Mills
    "Pollinator Paradise" Garden at Chatham Mills Created by Debbie Roos, North Carolina Cooperative Extension 206 species, 85% of them native to North Carolina More info at www.carolinapollinatorgarden.org Common Name Scientific Name Origin Perennial Flowers Yarrow Achillea millefolium 'Moonshine' NC Yarrow Achillea millefolium 'Paprika' NC Mexican giant hyssop Agastache mexicana 'Acapulco Orange' Mexico Anise hyssop Agastache x 'Blue Fortune' hybrid of U.S. native Mexican hyssop Agastache x 'Grape Nectar' Mexico Hummingbird mint Agastache x 'Red Happiness' southwest U.S. Licorice hyssop Agastache rupestris southwest U.S. Nodding onion Allium cernuum NC Dwarf indigo bush Amorpha herbacea NC Arkansas bluestar Amsonia hubrichtii Arkansas, Oklahoma Bluestar Amsonia tabernaemontana NC Tall anemone Anemone virginiana NC Eastern wild columbine Aquilegia canadensis NC Golden columbine Aquilegia chrysantha southwest U.S. Common leopardbane Arnica acaulis NC Swamp milkweed Asclepias incarnata NC Purple milkweed Asclepias purpurascens NC Common Name Scientific Name Origin Red milkweed Asclepias rubra NC Common milkweed Asclepias syriaca NC Butterfly weed Asclepias tuberosa NC Redring milkweed Asclepias variegata NC Whorled milkweed Asclepias verticillata NC Dwarf Tartarian aster Aster tataricus 'Jin Dai' exotic Wild indigo Baptisia x 'Carolina Moonlight' NC Wild indigo Baptisia x 'Purple Smoke' NC White wild indigo Baptisia alba NC Dwarf wild indigo Baptisia minor NC Downy wood mint Blephilia ciliata NC Decurrent false aster Boltonia decurrens central U.S. Bush's poppy mallow Callirhoe bushii central U.S. Fringed poppy mallow Callirhoe digitata central U.S. Prairie poppy mallow Callirhoe involucrata central U.S. Clustered poppy mallow Callirhoe triangulata NC Pink turtlehead Chelone lyonii NC Maryland golden aster Chrysopis mariana NC Field thistle Cirsium discolor NC Curlyheads Clematis ochroleuca NC Wild ageratum/mistflower Conoclinium coelestinum NC Palmleaf thoroughwort Conoclinium greggii southwest U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
    Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonbacterial Pus-Forming Diseases of the Skin Robert Jackson,* M.D., F.R.C.P[C], Ottawa, Ont
    Nonbacterial pus-forming diseases of the skin Robert Jackson,* m.d., f.r.c.p[c], Ottawa, Ont. Summary: The formation of pus as a Things are not always what they seem Fungus result of an inflammatory response Phaedrus to a bacterial infection is well known. North American blastomycosis, so- Not so well appreciated, however, The purpose of this article is to clarify called deep mycosis, can present with a is the fact that many other nonbacterial the clinical significance of the forma¬ verrucous proliferating and papilloma- agents such as certain fungi, viruses tion of pus in various skin diseases. tous plaque in which can be seen, par- and parasites may provoke pus Usually the presence of pus in or on formation in the skin. Also heat, the skin indicates a bacterial infection. Table I.Causes of nonbacterial topical applications, systemically However, by no means is this always pus-forming skin diseases administered drugs and some injected true. From a diagnostic and therapeutic Fungus materials can do likewise. Numerous point of view it is important that physi¬ skin diseases of unknown etiology cians be aware of the nonbacterial such as pustular acne vulgaris, causes of pus-forming skin diseases. North American blastomycosis pustular psoriasis and pustular A few definitions are required. Pus dermatitis herpetiformis can have is a yellowish [green]-white, opaque, lymphangitic sporotrichosis bacteriologically sterile pustules. The somewhat viscid matter (S.O.E.D.). Pus- cervicofacial actinomycosis importance of considering nonbacterial forming diseases are those in which Intermediate causes of pus-forming conditions of pus can be seen macroscopicaily.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Landscapes of Maine a Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems
    Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Copyright © 2010 by the Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation 93 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the authors or the Maine Natural Areas Program, except for inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Illustrations and photographs are used with permission and are copyright by the contributors. Images cannot be reproduced without expressed written consent of the contributor. ISBN 0-615-34739-4 To cite this document: Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine. Cover photo: Circumneutral Riverside Seep on the St. John River, Maine Printed and bound in Maine using recycled, chlorine-free paper Contents Page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 3 Foreword ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases
    Sexually Transmitted Diseases by John H. Dirckx, M.D. significant proportion of the modern practice of adult using condoms and avoiding high-risk behaviors such as anal gynecology and urology is devoted to the prevention, intercourse—and by limiting the number of sex partners. Adiagnosis, and treatment of sexually transmitted dis- The overall incidence of sexually transmitted infections eases (STDs), because of both the high prevalence of these has increased substantially during the past generation, and diseases and their almost exclusive involvement of the repro- some diseases have shown a marked increase. Several factors ductive systems in both sexes. have contributed to these changing statistics. The discovery in A sexually transmitted disease is any infectious disease the 1940s that penicillin could cure syphilis and gonorrhea and that is transmitted from one person to another through sexual the development during the 1950s of safe and effective oral contact, taking that phrase in its broadest sense. Venereal dis- contraceptives paved the way for the sexual revolution of the ease (VD), a synonymous term, has now largely fallen out of 1960s. Against a background of civil unrest, widespread drug use, as has the euphemism social disease. It is worth empha- abuse, and radical feminism, that revolution led to social sizing that the only thing all STDs have in common is their acceptance of sexual promiscuity, popularization of oral and mode of transmission. In other respects they vary widely anal sex, and definition of overt homosexuality as normal among themselves. The common tendency to lump them all behavior. together yields a biologically invalid concept that invites con- Other factors favoring sexual promiscuity have been the fusion and misunderstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpes: a Patient's Guide
    Herpes: A Patient’s Guide Herpes: A Patient’s Guide Introduction Herpes is a very common infection that is passed through HSV-1 and HSV-2: what’s in a name? ....................................................................3 skin-to-skin contact. Canadian studies have estimated that up to 89% of Canadians have been exposed to herpes simplex Herpes symptoms .........................................................................................................4 type 1 (HSV-1), which usually shows up as cold sores on the Herpes transmission: how do you get herpes? ................................................6 mouth. In a British Columbia study, about 15% of people tested positive for herpes simplex type 2 (HSV-2), which Herpes testing: when is it useful? ..........................................................................8 is the type of herpes most commonly thought of as genital herpes. Recently, HSV-1 has been showing up more and Herpes treatment: managing your symptoms ...................................................10 more on the genitals. Some people can have both types of What does herpes mean to you: receiving a new diagnosis ......................12 herpes. Most people have such minor symptoms that they don’t even know they have herpes. What does herpes mean to you: accepting your diagnosis ........................14 While herpes is very common, it also carries a lot of stigma. What does herpes mean to you: dating with herpes ....................................16 This stigma can lead to anxiety, fear and misinformation
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Anyphaenids (Araneae, Anyphaeninae, Anyphaenidae) Spider Fauna from the Chocó Forest of Ecuador, with the Description of Thirteen New Species
    European Journal of Taxonomy 255: 1–50 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.255 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2016 · Dupérré N. & Tapia E. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0E8DA4DC-FF4C-436E-94FB-CB89F6416C6E Overview of the Anyphaenids (Araneae, Anyphaeninae, Anyphaenidae) spider fauna from the Chocó forest of Ecuador, with the description of thirteen new species Nadine DUPÉRRÉ 1,* & Elicio TAPIA 2 1 Research Associate, Fundación OTONGA, Calle Rither y Bolivia, Quito, Ecuador, and Research Associate, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, U.S.A. 2 Researcher, Centro Jambatu de Investigación y Conservación de Anfibios, Geovanny Farina 566, San Rafael, Ecuador. * Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 Email: [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:F15E1FF2-2DF5-479A-AD10-8076CE96E911 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:E842405B-5E5B-43AB-8BCD-586657AD5CFC Abstract. The spider diversity of the family Anyphaenidae in premontane, low evergreen montane and cloud forest from the Chocó region of Ecuador is examined. A total of 287 adult specimens were collected and 19 morphospecies were identified based on male specimens. Thirteen new species are described and one new genus is proposed. Five new species are described in the genus Katissa Brescovit, 1997: Katissa kurusiki sp. nov., K. puyu sp. nov., K. tamya sp. nov., K. yaya sp. nov. and K. guyasamini sp. nov. The new genus Shuyushka gen. nov. is proposed and includes three species: Shuyushka achachay gen. et sp. nov., S. moscai gen. et sp. nov. and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Skin Disease and Disorders
    Sports Dermatology Robert Kiningham, MD, FACSM Department of Family Medicine University of Michigan Health System Disclosures/Conflicts of Interest ◼ None Goals and Objectives ◼ Review skin infections common in athletes ◼ Establish a logical treatment approach to skin infections ◼ Discuss ways to decrease the risk of athlete’s acquiring and spreading skin infections ◼ Discuss disqualification and return-to-play criteria for athletes with skin infections ◼ Recognize and treat non-infectious skin conditions in athletes Skin Infections in Athletes ◼ Bacterial ◼ Herpetic ◼ Fungal Skin Infections in Athletes ◼ Very common – most common cause of practice-loss time in wrestlers ◼ Athletes are susceptible because: – Prone to skin breakdown (abrasions, cuts) – Warm, moist environment – Close contacts Cases 1 -3 ◼ 21 year old male football player with 4 day h/o left axillary pain and tenderness. Two days ago he noticed a tender “bump” that is getting bigger and more tender. ◼ 16 year old football player with 3 day h/o mildly tender lesions on chin. Started as a single lesion, but now has “spread”. Over the past day the lesions have developed a dark yellowish crust. ◼ 19 year old wrestler with a 3 day h/o lesions on right side of face. Noticed “tingling” 4 days ago, small fluid filled lesions then appeared that have now started to crust over. Skin Infections Bacterial Skin Infections ◼ Cellulitis ◼ Erysipelas ◼ Impetigo ◼ Furunculosis ◼ Folliculitis ◼ Paronychea Cellulitis Cellulitis ◼ Diffuse infection of connective tissue with severe inflammation of dermal and subcutaneous layers of the skin – Triad of erythema, edema, and warmth in the absence of underlying foci ◼ S. aureus or S. pyogenes Erysipelas Erysipelas ◼ Superficial infection of the dermis ◼ Distinguished from cellulitis by the intracutaneous edema that produces palpable margins of the skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric Cutaneous Bacterial Infections Dr
    PEDIATRIC CUTANEOUS BACTERIAL INFECTIONS DR. PEARL C. KWONG MD PHD BOARD CERTIFIED PEDIATRIC DERMATOLOGIST JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA DISCLOSURE • No relevant relationships PRETEST QUESTIONS • In Staph scalded skin syndrome: • A. The staph bacteria can be isolated from the nares , conjunctiva or the perianal area • B. The patients always have associated multiple system involvement including GI hepatic MSK renal and CNS • C. common in adults and adolescents • D. can also be caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa • E. None of the above PRETEST QUESTIONS • Scarlet fever • A. should be treated with penicillins • B. should be treated with sulfa drugs • C. can lead to toxic shock syndrome • D. can be associated with pharyngitis or circumoral pallor • E. Both A and D are correct PRETEST QUESTIONS • Strep can be treated with the following antibiotics • A. Penicillin • B. First generation cephalosporin • C. clindamycin • D. Septra • E. A B or C • F. A and D only PRETEST QUESTIONS • MRSA • A. is only acquired via hospital • B. can be acquired in the community • C. is more aggressive than OSSA • D. needs treatment with first generation cephalosporin • E. A and C • F. B and C CUTANEOUS BACTERIAL PATHOGENS • Staphylococcus aureus: OSSA and MRSA • Gp A Streptococcus GABHS • Pseudomonas aeruginosa CUTANEOUS BACTERIAL INFECTIONS • Folliculitis • Non bullous Impetigo/Bullous Impetigo • Furuncle/Carbuncle/Abscess • Cellulitis • Acute Paronychia • Dactylitis • Erysipelas • Impetiginization of dermatoses BACTERIAL INFECTION • Important to diagnose early • Almost always
    [Show full text]
  • Sericocarpus Caespitosus, Sp. Nov. Phytoneuron 2021-33: 1–33
    Nesom, G.L. 2021. Sericocarpus asteroides (Asteraceae: Astereae), rhizomatous and colonial, and Sericocarpus caespitosus, sp. nov. Phytoneuron 2021-33: 1–33. Published 5 July 2021. ISSN 2153 733X SERICOCARPUS ASTEROIDES (ASTERACEAE: ASTEREAE), RHIZOMATOUS AND COLONIAL, AND SERICOCARPUS CAESPITOSUS, SP. NOV. GUY L. NESOM Research Associate Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 [email protected] ABSTRACT Allopatric population systems of two growth forms comprise the eastern USA species traditionally identified as Sericocarpus asteroides. The typical form (the type collected by Peter Kalm in New Jersey), which produces slender, stoloniform rhizomes, occurs along the Atlantic coast from southern Maine into South Carolina. Sericocarpus caespitosus Nesom, sp. nov., without stoloniform rhizomes, occurs inland from western New York to coastal counties of Alabama and Florida. An epitype is designated for Conyza asteroides L., clearly showing the rhizomes; neotypes are designated for Aster leucanthemus Raf. and Aster conyzoides var. plantaginifolius Nutt. (both are synonyms of S. asteroides sensu stricto). Sericocarpus oregonensis (with stoloniform rhizomes) and S. californicus (without stoloniform rhizomes) are similar in morphological distinction and have geographically separate distributions –– a similar rationale (morphology and geography) justifies their treatment as separate species. Sericocarpus asteroides (L.) B.S.P. occurs widely through the eastern USA (Fig. 1). Over much of its range, plants produce a relatively short, thick, fibrous-rooted rhizome with short basal offsets arising from a short caudex. Short, thick, caudex branches may arise from growth of these offsets. Along the Atlantic seaboard, however, from southern Maine to South Carolina, in addition to the larger perennating rhizome, plants produce slender, scale-leaved, stoloniform rhizomes that may elongate laterally up to 15 centimeters –– a rooting plantlet is produced at the tip of these rhizomes (these features are shown in type collections–Figs.
    [Show full text]