DOCSLIB.ORG

Gila Trout (Oncorhynchus Gilae) Data: Gila Trout Recovery Plan-2003 Partners: Arizona Game and Fish Department, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gila Trout (Oncorhynchus Gilae) Data: Gila Trout Recovery Plan-2003 Partners: Arizona Game and Fish Department, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, U.S Gila Trout (Oncorhynchus gilae) Data: Gila Trout Recovery Plan-2003 Partners: Arizona Game and Fish Department, New Mexico Department of Game and Fish, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Forest Service Gila Trout Species Status review: landowners provides opportunity for The Gila Trout was originally recognized as increased Gila Trout restoration and should endangered under the Federal Endangered result in a conservation benefit to the Species Preservation Act of 1966 (U.S. Fish species. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Wildlife Service, 1967). Federal- and the State wildlife and fisheries designated status of the fish as endangered management agencies responsible for was continued under the Endangered establishing fishing regulations work to Species Act of 1973 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife ensure that angling pressure does not Service, 1975) until 2006 when the species prevent, but enhances, progress toward full was down-listed to threatened (U.S. Fish and recovery. Gila Trout angling will continue to Wildlife Service, 2006). The Gila Trout was be managed by the States as long as the listed as endangered by the New Mexico population remains above the recovery Department of Game and Fish in 1975 under threshold. the Wildlife Conservation Act and was down-listed to threatened in 1988, and Distribution of Gila Trout: The extent of remains listed as threatened by New Mexico the historical distribution of the Gila Trout is Department of Game and Fish. Gila Trout not known with certainty. It is known to be are considered a Species of Concern by the native to higher elevation streams in Arizona Game and Fish Department. portions of the Gila River drainage in New Mexico, San Francisco River drainage in Sportfishing Status of the Gila Trout: Arizona and New Mexico, and tributaries to Fishing for Gila Trout was once restricted the Gila River in Arizona. Currently, there under its status as an endangered species. are 12 populations of Gila Trout in the wild. The down-listing to threatened in 2006 Additionally, the Mora National Fish Health includes a special provision that allows the and Technology Center (U.S. Fish and states of New Mexico and Arizona to Wildlife Service) maintains captive manage the species as a sportfish in select populations of all four Gila Trout lineages. areas for the first time in almost 50 years. Guidelines have been developed to allow for limited sport fishing in specific waters Range of the Gila Trout: where stocking of non-native trout was Three of the four relict populations are self- replaced by stocking of Gila Trout. Most sustaining in the wild; the relict population restoration streams continue to be protected in Spruce Creek was eliminated following from angling. However, allowing for limited the Whitewater-Baldy Fire in 2012. With the angling for a unique native species can exception of the Spruce Creek lineage, all increase public knowledge and support for other lineages have been replicated in a its conservation. Such support may come sufficient number of drainages to minimize from both sport fishing enthusiasts and potential loss of any lineage from a natural private landowners that might benefit from or human-caused event. The Main Diamond allowing access to fishing on their property. Involvement from the general public and Gila Trout (Oncorhynchus gilae) 37,000 in 1998 and current estimates are unavailable. Gila Trout Habitat Requirements: Habitat of Gila Trout consists of perennial montane streams ranging from 1,660 m (5,400 ft) to over 2,800 m (9,200 ft) elevation. Suitable stream habitat within the range of the species is situated between about 33° to near 35° north latitude and 107° 45' to near 112° 15' west longitude. Streams with suitable habitat for Gila Trout are found in coniferous and mixed woodland, Creek population was restored to its original montane coniferous forest, and sub-alpine habitat following its loss in the wild from coniferous forest. Stream flow is the 1989 Divide Fire. Replicates of the Main characterized by a snowmelt-dominated Diamond Creek population persist in Sheep hydrograph in most years and snowmelt Corral Canyon, lower Little Creek, and runoff typically begins in February, peaks in Black Canyon. Main Diamond lineage Gila March, and gradually decreases through Trout were recently stocked in upper May. Base flow conditions prevail in June Langstroth Creek but success of this and into July. Mean monthly discharge replication has not yet been documented. characteristically increases in July through Similarly, the South Diamond Creek September coinciding with runoff from population was restored to its original convectional summer thunderstorms. habitat following its loss in the wild from Sporadic periods of runoff from winter rains the 1995 Bonner Fire. The South Diamond or mid-season snowmelt often results in Creek population is replicated in Grapevine flows slightly elevated above base levels in Creek, Frye Creek, Willow Creek, and the December and January. Gila Trout require Mogollon Creek drainage, which includes a water temperatures below 25°C (77°F), portion of the main stem of Mogollon Creek, clean gravel substrate for spawning, Trail Canyon, Woodrow Canyon, and South continuous stream flow of sufficient Fork Mogollon Creek. The Whiskey Creek quantity to maintain adequate water depth relict population was eliminated by the 2012 and temperature, and pool habitat that Whitewater Baldy Fire, but has been provides refuge during low flow conditions replicated in McKenna Creek and upper and periods of thermal extremes. Abundant White Creek. The Spruce Creek population invertebrate prey, cover, and water free from was also eliminated by the 2012 Whitewater contaminants are also required. Cover Baldy Fire but is replicated in Big Dry typically consists of undercut banks, boulder Creek. Mixed lineage populations were alcoves, large woody debris, deep pools, established in Dude Creek and Ash Creek in exposed root masses of trees at water’s edge, 2015, recruitment has yet to be documented. and overhanging vegetation. The total population size of Gila Trout in the wild was estimated to be approximately Western Native Trout Status Report – Updated February 2016 Gila Trout (Oncorhynchus gilae) Concerns, Issues, or Obstacles chemical piscicide treatments and relative to the Conservation and electrofishing. Improvement of the status of Gila Land use and management issues Trout: Forest management includes activities that Water Condition Concerns directly or indirectly affect species composition, density, and vertical structure High stream discharge variability is a of vegetation. Changes in these forest defining characteristic of the environment to variables may affect watershed which Gila Trout has adapted. During low- characteristics such as infiltration, runoff, flow years, marginal habitats may become and erosion, and stream habitat too warm to support trout or surface flow characteristics such as sediment transport, may cease and stream segments may dry. nutrient cycling, physical habitat features, Pool depth may diminish to the extent that and water temperature. Forest management winter mortality of trout is greatly increased. includes silvicultural treatments (e.g., timber Large magnitude flood events during high harvest, thinning, prescribed burning) and flow years may scour stream channels and wildfire control. Although much of the eliminate year classes of trout. These habitat of Gila Trout is within designated frequent, recurring extremes in flow wilderness where timber harvest is not conditions are a basic element of the allowed, historical logging activities likely relatively harsh environment that caused major changes in watershed distinguishes habitat of Gila Trout from the characteristics and stream morphology. typical trout streams of more northern Poorly managed livestock grazing can latitudes. Wildfire impacts and drought in degrade watershed condition, stream habitat recent years have exacerbated the impacts of and riparian environments, resulting in flow variability. decreased production of salmonids. Historically, widespread, uncontrolled Non-native Sportfish Concerns livestock grazing likely contributed to habitat degradation modifications cited as a Stocking and naturalization of non-native cause for the decline of Gila Trout. Severe trout within the range of Gila trout and forest fires capable of extirpating or ensuing hybridization, predation, and decimating fish populations are relatively competition are major causes for the recent phenomena, resulting from the imperiled status of the species. Rainbow cumulative effects of historical or ongoing Trout and Brown Trout have become overgrazing by domestic livestock and fire naturalized and are widespread within the suppression. historical range of Gila Trout. Current stocking of Rainbow Trout is conducted only in stream segments not inhabited by Natural disturbances Gila Trout, however, hybridization with Rainbow Trout remains a prominent threat Over the last decade, large scale wildfires to Gila Trout. A vital component of recovery have occurred on a more regular frequency and long-term survival of Gila Trout is than historically observed. These fires have removal of non-native trout through eliminated several populations of Gila Trout Western Native Trout Status Report – Updated February 2016 Gila Trout (Oncorhynchus gilae) and drastically altered the hydrology in unique genetic identity of the species, which many watersheds. Views of the geographic represents its evolutionary history and local
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of Western North America
    CItiEt'SW XHPYTD: RSOTLAITYWUAS 4 Monograph of ha, TEMPI, AZ The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo Of Western North America Robert J. Behnke "9! August 1979 z 141, ' 4,W \ " • ,1■\t 1,es. • . • • This_report was funded by USDA, Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service , Bureau of Land Management FORE WARD This monograph was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Behnke under contract funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. Region 2 of the Forest Service was assigned the lead in coordinating this effort for the Forest Service. Each agency assumed the responsibility for reproducing and distributing the monograph according to their needs. Appreciation is extended to the Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, for assistance in publication. Mr. Richard Moore, Region 2, served as Forest Service Coordinator. Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. Rocky Mountain Region September, 1980 Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. it TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Management of Threatened and Endangered Western Trouts
    Biology and Management of Threatened and Endangered Western Trouts August 1976 USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-28 Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Abstract Behnke, R. J., and Mark Zarn. 1976. Biology and management of threatened and endangered western trouts. USDA For. Sew. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-28, 45 p. Rocky Mt. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, Colo. Discusses taxonomy, reasons for decline, life history and ecology, and sug- gestions for preservation and management of six closely related trouts native to western North America: Colorado River cutthroat, Salmo clarki pleuriticus; green- back trout, S. c. stomias; Lahontan cutthroat, S. c. henshawi; Paiute trout, S. c. seleniris; Gila trout, S. gilae; and Arizona native trout, S. apache. Meristic characters, distribution and status, habitat requirements and limiting factors, protective measures, and management recommendations are presented for each taxon. Keywords: Native trout, Salrno clarki pleuriticus. Sali?zo ckurki stoi~zius. Sulnzo clarki herzshawi, Salmo clarki seleniris, Salrno gilue. Sulrno uprrchc. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-28 August 1976 Biology and Management of Threatened and Endangered Western Trouts R. J. Behnke Colorado State University Mark Zarn Conservation Library Denver Public Library Information reported here was prepared under contract by the Conservation Library of the Denver Public Library, through the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. The report is printed as prepared by the authors; opinions are not necessarily those of the U.S. Forest Service. TABLE OF CONTENTS I . GJ3NERAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR RAE3 AND ENDANGJIRED WESTERN TROUTS Introduction ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • GILA TROUT (Oncorhynchus Gilae)
    (Technical Review Draft, April 2002) GILA TROUT (Oncorhynchus gilae) (Third Revision) RECOVERY PLAN (Original Approved: January 12, 1979) (First Revision Approved: January 3, 1984) (Second Revision Approved: December 8, 1993) Prepared by John Pittenger (Purchase Order 201819M251) for Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico Approved: XXX Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Date: DISCLAIMER Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions believed to be required to recover and/ or protect listed species. Plans published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or national Marine Fisheries Service are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Recovery teams serve as independent advisors to the Services. Plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are adopted by the Services. Objectives of the plan will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks and may not represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service/National Marine Fisheries Service. They represent the official position of the National Marine Fisheries Service/U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service only after they have been signed by the Assistant Administrator/Regional Director or Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus Clarkii Pleuriticus)
    Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus): A Technical Conservation Assessment Michael K. Young Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project United States Department of Agriculture / Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-207-WWW March 2008 Young, Michael K. 2008. Colorado River cutthroat trout: a technical conservation assess- ment. [Online]. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-207-WWW. Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Station. 123 p. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_GTR- 207-WWW.pdf [March 2008]. Abstract The Colorado River cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus) was once distributed throughout the colder waters of the Colorado River basin above the Grand Canyon. About 8 percent of its historical range is occupied by unhybridized or ecologically significant populations. It has been petitioned for listing under the Endangered Species Act and is accorded special status by several state and federal agencies. Habitat alteration and nonnative trout invasions led to the extirpation of many populations and impede restoration. Habitat fragmentation exacerbated by climate change is an emerging threat. A strategic, systematic approach to future conservation is likely to be the most successful. The Author Michael Young has been a Research Fisheries Biologist with the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station since 1989. His work focuses on the ecology and conservation of native coldwater fishes and the effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbance on stream ecosystems. Address: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 East Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, Montana 59801. Email: [email protected]. Acknowledgments I thank Todd Allison, Warren Colyer, Greg Eaglin, Noah Greenwald, Paula Guenther-Gloss, Christine Hirsch, Jessica Metcalf, Dirk Miller, Kevin Rogers, and Dennis Shiozawa for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • APACHE TROUT My First Exposure to What Later Proved to Be Apache Trout, Caused Considerable Consternation. This Occurred In
    c J tap APACHE TROUT My first exposure to what later proved to be Apache trout, caused considerable consternation. This occurred in the late 1950's while conducting graduate research on the native trout of the Great Basin (mainly the cutthroat trout native to the Lahontan and Bonneville basins of Nevada and Utah). I had borrowed all of the preserved specimens available in museums to examine in order to characterize the subspecies described from the Lahontan and Bonneville basins. These diagnoses would allow me to recognize these subspecies if they still existed. Both the Lahontan subspecies henshawi and the Bonneville subspecies Utah were generally regarded to be extinct as pure populations at the time, but the problem was that if these subspecies still existed, how could they be verified since no valid diagnosis of the subspecies had ever been made. My study was progressing nicely as I compiled the diagnostic traits of the two subspecies when I received three specimens from the U.S. National Museum labeled, "Panguitch Lake, Utah" (a lake in Bonneville basin). These specimens were collected in 1873 and were entirely distinct from any form of cutthroat trout known to me. The specimens were only about five to eight inches in length but their deep bodies, long fins, spotting patterns, and other internal characters such„ as the number of vertebrae were very different from any other trout with which I was familiar. I pondered the question in my MS. thesis; How could a trout so distinctively different from the Bonneville cutthroat have existed in the Bonneville basin and not previously recognized? When I became aware that mix-ups of specimens and locality records of fish collections made by geological surveys and railroad surveys in the nineteenth century were a common occurrence, a bit of further investigation revealed that these three specimens (U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Bulletin Is Now an On-Line Publication
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service For over a century, the Fish and Wildlife Service has played a vital role in conserving America’s fishery resources. In 1871, Congress established what is now known as the National Fish Hatchery System. Its origi­ February 2007 Vol. XXXII No. 1 nal purpose was to provide domestic food fish to replace declining native fish. Over the past 30 years, in the face of increasing demands on aquatic systems and grow­ ing environmental threats to those systems, the mission of the National Fish Hatchery System expanded and diver­ sified. In addition to restor­ ing native fish populations, mitigating for fisheries lost as a result of federal water projects, and providing fish to benefit tribes and national wildlife refuges, the system has a unique responsibility in helping to recover various aquatic species listed under the Endangered Species Act. I N T H I S I S S U E 4 The National Fish Hatchery System 6 A Living Fossil Fights for Survival 10 The Return of a Lake-dwelling Giant Telephone: (703) 358-2390 Contributors 12 Hatcheries are for More Than Fish Fax: (703) 358-1735 Stuart C. Leon E-mail: [email protected] Jeff M. Finley Craig Springer Apache Trout: Swimming Towards Web site: Richard Shelton 14 www.fws.gov/endangered/bulletin.html Wade Fredenberg Recovery Editor Mark Maskill Michael Bender Yvette Converse Tom Brandt Editorial Assistance 16 The Texas Blind Salamander Ann Haas Layout Dennis & Sackett Design, Inc. 18 National Fish Hatchery System Facilities On the Cover Photographed in a clear, shallow stream, this Lahontan cutthroat trout displays its lateral line, which is a sensory organ used to detect movement in the surrounding water.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Native Trout Initiative
    Western Native Trout Initiative Mission: “To serve as a key catalyst for the implementation of conservation or management actions, through partnerships and cooperative efforts, resulting in improved species status, improved aquatic habitats, and improved recreational opportunities for native trout anglers across western states”. Little Kern Golden trout Western Native Trout Initiative Focal species Alaskan Kokanee o Dolly Varden Alaskan Rainbow Trout o Gila Trout Apache Trout o Greenback Cutthroat Trout Arctic Char o Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Arctic Grayling o Little Kern Golden Trout o Paiute Cutthroat Trout Bonneville Cutthroat Trout o Redband Trout Bull Trout o Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout California Golden Trout o Westslope Cutthroat Trout Coastal Cutthroat Trout o Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout Colorado River Cutthroat Western Native Trout Initiative WNTI Steering Committee = 15 members 9 western state agencies 3 federal agencies (USFWS, USFS, BLM) 1 conservation organization (Trout Unlimited) 1 tribal nation (vacant) 1 Canadian provincial agency (vacant) 1 staff person = Coordinator Programs/activities Fall grant program = large habitat projects (federal NFHP funding) Spring = Small Grants Program (other funds that we raise) Science and Data Campaign for Western Native Trout Western Native Trout Initiative From 2006-2017, WNTI has directed almost $5.5 million in federal fish habitat partnership funds leveraged to $25 million public and private matching dollars for 141 priority native trout conservation projects. 87 fish passage barriers removed 1,129 stream miles reconnected, restored or improved 30 barriers constructed to protect and conserve priority populations 671 watersheds or populations assessed Over 350 partnering organizations Western Native Trout Initiative WNTI Small Grants Program Since 2016: 26 small grants projects funded with $73,970 in donations to WNTI and matched with $1,080,953 in other funding.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trout Streamside Identification Guide - a Joint Production of Flyfishingthesierra.Com and Wildtroutstreams.Com
    Native Trout Streamside Identification Guide - a joint production of FlyFishingtheSierra.com and WildTroutStreams.com Copyright © 2011 by WildTroutStreams.com Illustrations Copyright © 2009-2011 by Steven Schalla, FlyFishingtheSierra.com, used with permission. The complete and unaltered PDF file may be redistributed over the Internet for non-commercial purposes. All other rights are reserved by the respective copyright holders. Using this Guide This guide describes 24 trout species and sub-species sought by anglers in the This guide is intended to assist you in doing that. No one will mistake these illus- lower-48 United States. Included are all of the commonly sought trout, and more trations for real fish, but we view that as an advantage because we can exagger- than a few of the obscure ones. A comprehensive guide might easily have pro- ate the features that really matter. A photo-realistic image may look gorgeous, vided twice as many, but we think this is a useful selection that will cover most but may never match the fish at the end of your line. A real fish may look dra- anglers’ needs. matically different fromany one-off illustration or photo. In the final analysis, we Conclusively identifying a species on the stream is often impossible in the few do the best we can. If your best judgement is you’ve caught the species you’ve seconds you have to examine a trout before releasing it unharmed. While most identified, what else matters? experienced trout anglers will be able to distinguish the most common trout We’ve designed this guide to take with you.
    [Show full text]
  • GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866
    FAMILY Salmonidae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids SUBFAMILY Salmoninae Jarocki (or Schinz), 1822 - salmonids [=Dermopteres, Salmonidi, Salmones, Tutriformes (Truttiformes), Salvelini, Brachymystini, Oncorhynchus, Huchoninae, Salmothymini, Salvelinini, Parahuchoninae] GENUS Brachymystax Gunther, 1866 - lenoks, Asiatic trout, Manchurian trout Species Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773) - sharp-snouted lenok [=coregonoides, swetowidowi] Species Brachymystax savinovi Mitrofanov, 1959 - Russian lenok Species Brachymystax tsinlingensis Li, 1966 - Yangtze lenok Species Brachymystax tumensis Mori, 1930 - blunt-snouted lenok [=czerskii] GENUS Hucho Gunther, 1866 - salmonids [=Epitomynis] Species Hucho bleekeri Kimura, 1934 - Bleeker's hucho Species Hucho hucho (Linnaeus, 1758) - huchen, huchen trout, Danube salmon [=germanorum] Species Hucho ishikawae Mori, 1928 - Korean hucho Species Hucho taimen (Pallas, 1773) - taimen [=fluviatilis, lossos] GENUS Oncorhynchus Suckley, 1861 - salmonids [=Hypsifario, Paraoncorhynchus, Parasalmo] Species Oncorhynchus aguabonita (Jordan, 1892) - golden trout, California golden trout [=roosevelti, whitei] Species Oncorhynchus apache (Miller, 1972) - apache trout, Arizona trout Species Oncorhynchus chrysogaster (Needham & Gard, 1964) - Mexican golden trout Species Oncorhynchus clarkii (Richardson, 1837) - cutthroat trout [=alpestris, alvordensis, bathoecetor, behnkei, bouvieri, brevicauda, carinatus, carmichaeli, crescentis, declivifrons, eremogenes, evermanni, henshawi, humboldtensis, jordani, lewisi, macdonaldi,
    [Show full text]
  • The Gila Trout Is Native to the Headwaters of the Gila River And
    This beautiful native trout is still listed WHAT IS A NATIVE TROUT? opportunities for others. As the human as "endangered with extinction". population grew, the more accessable However, recent efforts by the New Millions of sportsmen thrill at the sight streams became depleted of native Mexico Department of Game & Fish, New of a leaping rainbow trout, nervously trout and thoughts turned towards Mexico State University, U.S. Forest anticipate the strike of a wary brown, or restoring them to many overfished Service, and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife marvel at the colorful beauty of a brook areas. State and Federal agencies began Service have expanded its range. This trout fresh from a high mountain lake building hatcheries to supply trout in GILA TROUT will allow its classification to be changed or stream. Naturally reproducing their early fish culture programs. from endangered to threatened. populations of these trout, particularly However, they soon discovered that Management goals include the when caught in remote, back country other species which had been cultured GILA TROUT continued renewal of populations within waters are often referred to as "natives". for many years in more populated areas its historic range and the eventual Many fishermen are surprised to learn The Gila trout is native to the of the United States were readily headwaters of the Gila River and removal of the Gila trout from that these fish were not originally found available and had been domesticated to in New Mexico or Arizona, but are occupies several small streams in the protected status so that it may be a point that enabled them to be more Gila and Aldo Leopold Wilderness areas managed as a sport fish.
    [Show full text]
  • WNTC Completions Reach 43! the Total Number of People That Have Met the WNTI Trout Challenge Reached 43 in Mid-May of 2020
    WNTC Completions Reach 43! The total number of people that have met the WNTI Trout Challenge reached 43 in mid-May of 2020. One individual achieved the Master Caster Level (18 species across 12 states), 9 people achieved the Advanced Caster Level (12 species across at least 8 states), and 33 people achieved the Expert Caster Level (6 species across at least 4 states). Congratulations! Photo: Mark Hutchings of Provo, Utah earning his Advanced Caster award catching a Bonneville Cutthroat Trout. First Angler to Complete WNTC Master Caster Level Steve MacMillan achieved Master Level in the WNTC in October of 2019. He caught Arctic Char, Coastal Cutthroat Trout, Alaska Rainbow Trout, and Dolly Varden in Alaska; Eagle Lake Rainbow Trout, Little Kern Golden Trout, Kern River Rainbow Trout, and California Golden Trout in California, Redband Trout in Oregon, Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in Nevada, Bonneville Cutthroat Trout in Utah, Apache Trout in Arizona, Gila Trout in New Mexico, Colorado River Cutthroat Trout and Yellowstone Cutthroat Trout in Wyoming, Westslope Cutthroat Trout in Montana, Bull Trout in Idaho, and Rio Grande Cutthroat Trout in Colorado. Steve was the first person to receive both the Ad vanced Caster and Master Caster Level awards. Steve was the recipient of a Helios 3 flyfishing rod, a sponsor of the WNTC. Congratulations, Steve! Lillard Fly Fishing Expeditions Supports WNTC Lillard Fly Fishing Expeditions (LFFE) in Pisgah Forest, North Carolina is jumping on the Trout Chal- lenge bandwagon. For every individual that registers for the WNTC, LFFE will make a donation to WNTI and will enter that individual into a drawing for a Rep Your Water native trout hat (drawing on May 15 and winner announced via Lillard Fly Fishing Expeditions Instagram).
    [Show full text]
  • Gila Trout Recovery Plan
    GILA TROUT RECOVERY PLAN . U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service New Mexico Ecological Services State Office Albuquerque, New Mexico December 1993 GILA TROUT (Second Revision) RRCOVRRY PLAN (Original Approved: June 20, 1983) (First Revision Approved: January 3, 1984) Prepared by John Pittenger (Contract Number NMGF 78-519-36) for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service David Prop&, Leader New Mexico Department of Game and Fish Santa Fe, New Mexico Paul Turner New Mexico State University Las Cruces, New Mexico Bruce Anderson U.S. Forest Service, Gila National Forest Silver City, New Mexico Robert David U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 2 Alchesay National Fish Hatchery, Arizona for Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico Approved: )43!f-6&44. Date: DISCLAIMER Recovery plane delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plane are published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and, sometimes, are prepared with the aeeietance of recovery teems, contractors, state agencies, atnd others. Objectives may be attained and any necessary funds may be made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plane do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in the plan formulation other then the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service w after they have been signed by the Regional Director or the Director.
    [Show full text]