De-Mystifying Impact Investing. an Entrepreneurs' Guide

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

De-Mystifying Impact Investing. an Entrepreneurs' Guide De-mystifying Impact Investing An Entrepreneurs' Guide Author: Rustam Sengupta Researchers: Somboddhi Ghosh & Sunaina Mullick Supported & Published by GIZ, India Published by: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH, New Delhi Responsible Enterprise Finance Programme giz - Private Sector Development B 5 / 1 , Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi -110029 , India W: www.giz.de Responsible: Wolfgang Leidig, GIZ Coordination and Contact: Katharina Kuehn, GIZ T: +91 11 4949 5353 E: [email protected] Author: Rustam Sengupta, Boond Design: Rouge Communications New Delhi, July 2015 De-mystifying Impact Investing An Entrepreneurs' Guide Author: Rustam Sengupta Researchers: Somboddhi Ghosh & Sunaina Mullick Supported & Published by GIZ, India This Handbook his handbook has been designed T as an easy read to provide information on not just a number of impact funds but also on investing essentials like the instruments used, investment process, term sheets as well as what investors look for. The information collected in this handbook was born out of interviews with numerous entrepreneurs and investors and envisages plugging the essential information dissymmetry present in the industry and supporting and encouraging entrepreneurs to make more informed and efficient decisions. Foreword Foreword Dear Readers, It is widely acknowledged that India is one of the major markets for impact investing with innovative entrepreneurs who serve the “Bottom of the Pyramid”, pioneering investors that walk the extra mile to help entrepreneurs scale their business models, and a supportive and highly evolved ecosystem comprising a diverse set of stakeholders. Together with SIDBI, the Small Industries Development Bank of India, GIZ, under the framework of Indo-German bilateral cooperation funded by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) aims to make a contribution to further strengthen the eco-system for impact investing. Our joint “Responsible Enterprise Finance Programme” started in late 2013 and as one of our focus areas we work to increase the number of enterprises that have access to risk capital. Within this framework, we have collaborated with a number of stakeholders to increase transparency in the industry and support capital flow to social enterprises as well as strengthen incubators and help entrepreneurs get investment ready. A recent report launched together with Intellecap entitled The Indian Impact Investing Story shows that USD $ 1.6 billion of capital has been invested in 220+ impact enterprises across India since the year 2000. For social entrepreneurs it is often a challenge to understand when to raise which kind of capital including grants, seed funds, angel investments, impact oriented venture capital as well as debt, which investors to approach for their financing needs and how investor involvement may impact the development of their business. This guide addresses some of the questions we have heard frequently when talking to entrepreneurs, and we hope that it will be of help when looking for capital from impact oriented funds: Written by entrepreneurs for entrepreneurs, it lines out requirements, investor expectations as well as investor types in an easily accessible way, and also offers support to entrepreneurs in asking the right questions and approaching the right investors for their particular needs. We are very interested in your feedback as well as suggestions for our future work, and would kindly ask you to take a few minutes to fill in the enclosed postcard and send it back to us. Enjoy reading and good luck on your journey towards raising capital! Wolfgang Leidig Director Private Sector Development GIZ India Content Content Chapter-I Introduction 2 Chapter-II Type of Investment Instruments 9 Chapter-III When to Raise Investments, How Much and on What Terms? 21 Chapter-IV Impact Investors in India 51 Chapter-V Key Takeaways 119 Appendix-1 Impact Investment Map 123 Appendix-2 Sample Term Sheet 125 List of Abbreviations 136 References 138 About the Author 140 GIZ 141 Chapter-I Introduction Because the people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do. –Steve Jobs C h ENTREPRENEURS HANDBOOK TO IMPACT INVESTMENTS a p t e r - I Introduction One of the most challenging tasks for any entrepreneur is to raise funds for his or her venture from others. It requires not just good business but also persistence, negotiation skills and a thorough understanding of the position of the investor sitting opposite him or her. Most entrepreneurs understand their own needs and constraints very well but often fail to acknowledge the requirements and limitations of the investors, creating deadlocks and breakdown of talks. In the development sector, this problem is further compounded as the return expectations are not clear and the investor mindset is harder to understand since their requirements cannot be boxed into financial parameters alone. Besides, entrepreneurs often start their journey heavily passionate about their missions and causes, speaking a language very different from the quantitative-heavy investor speak. This handbook has been designed for early stage entrepreneurs and potential change-makers and attempts to de-mystify the language and requirements of typical impact investors that they will encounter while raising funds. This handbook has been written by entrepreneurs and for entrepreneurs and has a number of interviews, quotes and comments from those who have successfully and unsuccessfully raised capital over the past five years. Furthermore, the handbook also tries to highlight some of the different 'impact funds' with the objective of reducing the time and effort that the entrepreneur spends in finding the right funding match. The Genesis The social sector has been historically grant funded. This means that based on the impact and social work that the entrepreneurs perform, philanthropic individuals have been giving them money and support, often not expecting any returns other than just evidence of the good work. This sort of funding has been extremely beneficial in areas where commercial models are challenging or the solutions are 2 C h a INTRODUCTION p t e r - I risky and require a high degree of experimentation or innovation. Besides, very early stage enterprises also gain from these grant funds as they can utilize it to ameliorate their business model and sharpen their offerings. Over the past few years, probably since the late nineties, there has been a tacit understanding that in some cases 'grant' or 'free' funds might not be the best way to have a social impact and might not be able to create a growth-based ecosystem. This realization might have also come from the lack of sustainable results and a high amount of pilferage that some social organizations have unfortunately shown. Also, the argument has been that the 'social' mindset and 'free funds' have also retarded professional behavior and innovation often leading to heavy wastage and high resource drain. Finally the recessions in the recent years and the drying up of grant funding sources have also reduced the popularity of pure philanthropic capital as many large donors have been forced to reduce their development spending significantly. From all this 'a new class of investors' has emerged who, while looking to make a social impact with their funds, also look for financial returns (or at least a return on capital). This group has coined themselves 'Impact Investors' and over the past five years, have mushroomed in every country and sector that earlier was grant funded or regarded as social. While this development is positive and has been welcomed by entrepreneurs, this class of investors is still very unstructured, unregulated and lacks a credible track record of matching their words with their actions. India, being one of the largest playgrounds for development professional has seen a large share of 'impact investment funds' with nearly 80 funds presently investing or looking to invest here (list of contacts enclosed in Appendix 1). 3 C h ENTREPRENEURS HANDBOOK TO IMPACT INVESTMENTS a p t e r - I ?? The Conundrum This 'Impact Investor' funding source is often confusing for entrepreneurs as even though they all call themselves 'impact focused', their expectations, metrics, requirements and expertise are all very diverse and very little information is available publicly on most of them (especially for the seed and early stage funds). This often makes entrepreneurs looking for funding waste a lot of time finding the correct match and also makes the search tedious, taking precious time and resources away from the real challenge that they have set out to solve. Another issue a number of entrepreneurs face with this source of funding is the difference in language used by the investors, often quite financial and quantitative in nature, which typically lies outside the domain of understanding of the social entrepreneurs. It might be interesting to note at this juncture, that our research while drafting this handbook showed that while a number of 'impact funds' proclaim their affinity to high impact, they are also typically very inclined to make 'tangible profits' from their investments and often use the same standards and terms that are prevalent in pure profit centric investments in other fields like technology or consumer goods. While interacting with over 25 potential entrepreneurs looking for funding during the research for this handbook, we observed that less than 25% were aware of what the investors looked for, what terms would be in place to get the investment and what to expect post investment and less than even 10% had proper information about the impact investors that they were going to pitch to (like the returns expected, length of fund cycle, support services etc.). This asymmetry of information is very dangerous to entrepreneurs since in order to get funding they are often expected to share fine details of their models (often without any Non Disclosure Agreement) while not knowing anything about the investors opposite him or her.
Recommended publications
  • India Weekly Newsletter]
    India January 30 Weekly Newsletter 2012 This document covers news related to India with a special focus on areas like mergers & acquisitions, private equity & venture capital. Volume 121, January 30th, 2012 For the period January 23, 2012 to January 29, 2012 January 30, 2012 [INDIA WEEKLY NEWSLETTER] Highlights Ocean Sparkle Calls Off TAG Offshore Acquisition…(3) ONGC Videsh To Acquire 15% Stake In OAO Yamal…(4) Content Pages Mitsubishi Electric Corp Acquires Pune Based Mergers & Acquisitions News 3-5 Messung Group…(5) Mergers & Acquisitions Deals 5-8 Strides Arcolab Sells Ascent Pharmahealth To Watson Pharma…(6) Private Equity News 8-10 VG Siddhartha’s Coffee Day Group Ups MindTree Stake To 18%…(7) Private Equity Deals 10-12 Temasek to invest Rs685 cr In Godrej Venture Capital News 12-12 Consumer for 5% Stake…(8) Venture Capital Deals 13-14 Ansal Properties to raise Rs300 cr for Gurgaon Project…(9) India Infoline Venture Capital Fund Raises Rs 500 cr Realty Fund…(10) KIMS Raises Rs170 cr From OrbiMed, Ascent Capital…(11) IL&FS Buys Logix Group's Noida Property For Rs600 cr…(12) Online Jewellery Store BlueStone.com Raises $5 mn VC Funding…(13) Sequoia Invests Rs20 cr In E-Recharge Portal- Freecharge.in…(13) InRev Systems Raises SeriesA Funding…(14) Confidential LKP Securities Limited 2 January 30, 2012 [INDIA WEEKLY NEWSLETTER] Mergers & Acquisitions News Ocean Sparkle Calls Off TAG Offshore Acquisition Ocean Sparkle's acquisition talks with TAG offshore have not fructified. P Jairaj Kumar - chairman and MD of Ocean Sparkle did not elaborate on the reason for not going ahead with the $100 mn proposal, citing a confidentiality clause with TAG Offshore.
    [Show full text]
  • Offer Opens on February 16, 2016 Offer Closes on March 01, 2016 Schedule of Activities of the Open Offer Is Given Below
    LETTER OF OFFER THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION This Letter of Offer is sent to you as a Public Shareholder (as defined below) of Inditrade Capital Limited (the “Target Company”). If you require any clarifications about the action to be taken, you may consult your stockbroker or investment consultant or Manager to the Offer or Registrar to the Offer as defined herein below. In case you have recently sold EquityShares of the Target Company held in physical form, please hand over this Letter of Offer and the accompanying Form of Acceptance cum Acknowledgement and transfer deed to the members of Stock Exchange through whom the said sale was effected. Open Offer (“Open Offer” / ”Offer”) By Mr. Sudip Bandyopadhyay (“Acquirer1”) Residing at: Ansal Heights, Block – B, Flat No. 1801, 18th Floor, Worli Naka, Mumbai – 400018, Maharashtra, India; Tel.: 022–61484700 AND Juno Moneta Technologies Private Limited (“Acquirer 2”) Registered Office: PhoenixHouse, 203 - 2nd floor, B Wing, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (West), Mumbai – 400 013, Maharashtra, India.; Tel.: 022–61484700;Fax: 022-61484710 AND A.T. Invofin India Private Limited (“Acquirer 3”) Registered Office: A-60, Naraina Industrial Area, Phase – I, New Delhi – 110028, India.; Tel.: 011 -41411071/72; Fax: 011-41410839 (Acquirer 1, Acquirer 2 and Acquirer 3, hereinafter collectively referred as “Acquirers”) To acquire up to 6,113,445 (Sixty One Lakh Thirteen Thousand Four Hundred Forty Five) Equity Shares (as defined below), constituting 26% (twenty six percent) of the Emerging VotingShare Capital (as defined below). (“Offer Share” / ”Offer Size”) OF Inditrade Capital Limited (“Target Company”) Registered Office: XXXVI - 202, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Venturing Report 2019
    Tilburg University 2019 Corporate Venturing Report Eckblad, Joshua; Gutmann, Tobias; Lindener, Christian Publication date: 2019 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Eckblad, J., Gutmann, T., & Lindener, C. (2019). 2019 Corporate Venturing Report. Corporate Venturing Research Group, TiSEM, Tilburg University. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 24. sep. 2021 Corporate Venturing 2019 Report SUMMIT@RSM All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2019. Created by Joshua Eckblad, Academic Researcher at TiSEM in The Netherlands. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LEAD AUTHORS 03 Forewords Joshua G. Eckblad 06 All Investors In External Startups [email protected] 21 Corporate VC Investors https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ 38 Accelerator Investors CentER PhD Candidate, Department of Management 43 2018 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Our Results) Tilburg School of Economics and Management (TiSEM) Tilburg University, The Netherlands 56 2019 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Please Distribute) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Young Entrepreneurs Flourishing in a Promising Environment: a Study In
    Journal of Management Engineering and Information Technology (JMEIT) 2394 - 8124 Volume -2, Issue- 6, Dec. 2015, ISSN: Website: www.jmeit.com | E-mail: [email protected]|[email protected] Young Entrepreneurs Flourishing In a Promising Environment: A Study In Reference to Contemperory Business Startups and Global Investing Practices Pawan Kalyani Pawan Kalyani, MRES [email protected] Abstract: Entrepreneurship is a mindset of a person who scope of negotiating and bargaining, customer took the wants to do things differently in a new fashion, he is the advantage of competition and price war, but it has one thing it person who want to achieve a great heights, wants to is a very time consuming option. As the scenario changes innovate and be creative. In today’s contemporary scenario people have shifted towards technology driven things and due young generation of India want to be entrepreneur not a job to shortage of time and offers people like to buy online, via seeker. There are many examples when graduates from IIT websites and smartphones. Here comes the topic of interest who / IIMs refused to do job and started their own venture. They are the people, who are providing the facilities to buy or sell find the gaps in demand and supply, analyze requirement goods online, they are entrepreneur. An entrepreneur looks into and tries to fulfill them. They are different from traditional the gaps in existing business model or provide a new and businessman they are ambitious, risk takers having high innovative way of doing the things. In the case of online desires of achievements that motivates them to get their purchasing it’s the purchasing of the goods, but in a different goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Venturing Report 2019
    Corporate Venturing 2019 Report SUMMIT@RSM All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 2019. Created by Joshua Eckblad, Academic Researcher at TiSEM in The Netherlands. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS LEAD AUTHORS 03 Forewords Joshua G. Eckblad 06 All Investors In External Startups [email protected] 21 Corporate VC Investors https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ 38 Accelerator Investors CentER PhD Candidate, Department of Management 43 2018 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Our Results) Tilburg School of Economics and Management (TiSEM) Tilburg University, The Netherlands 56 2019 Global Startup Fundraising Survey (Please Distribute) Dr. Tobias Gutmann [email protected] https://www.corporateventuringresearch.org/ LEGAL DISCLAIMER Post-Doctoral Researcher Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG Chair of Strategic Management and Digital Entrepreneurship The information contained herein is for the prospects of specific companies. While HHL Leipzig Graduate School of Management, Germany general guidance on matters of interest, and every attempt has been made to ensure that intended for the personal use of the reader the information contained in this report has only. The analyses and conclusions are been obtained and arranged with due care, Christian Lindener based on publicly available information, Wayra is not responsible for any Pitchbook, CBInsights and information inaccuracies, errors or omissions contained [email protected] provided in the course of recent surveys in or relating to, this information. No Managing Director with a sample of startups and corporate information herein may be replicated Wayra Germany firms. without prior consent by Wayra. Wayra Germany GmbH (“Wayra”) accepts no Wayra Germany GmbH liability for any actions taken as response Kaufingerstraße 15 hereto.
    [Show full text]
  • Fintech Monthly Market Update | July 2021
    Fintech Monthly Market Update JULY 2021 EDITION Leading Independent Advisory Firm Houlihan Lokey is the trusted advisor to more top decision-makers than any other independent global investment bank. Corporate Finance Financial Restructuring Financial and Valuation Advisory 2020 M&A Advisory Rankings 2020 Global Distressed Debt & Bankruptcy 2001 to 2020 Global M&A Fairness All U.S. Transactions Restructuring Rankings Advisory Rankings Advisor Deals Advisor Deals Advisor Deals 1,500+ 1 Houlihan Lokey 210 1 Houlihan Lokey 106 1 Houlihan Lokey 956 2 JP Morgan 876 Employees 2 Goldman Sachs & Co 172 2 PJT Partners Inc 63 3 JP Morgan 132 3 Lazard 50 3 Duff & Phelps 802 4 Evercore Partners 126 4 Rothschild & Co 46 4 Morgan Stanley 599 23 5 Morgan Stanley 123 5 Moelis & Co 39 5 BofA Securities Inc 542 Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters). Announced Locations Source: Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters) Source: Refinitiv (formerly known as Thomson Reuters) or completed transactions. No. 1 U.S. M&A Advisor No. 1 Global Restructuring Advisor No. 1 Global M&A Fairness Opinion Advisor Over the Past 20 Years ~25% Top 5 Global M&A Advisor 1,400+ Transactions Completed Valued Employee-Owned at More Than $3.0 Trillion Collectively 1,000+ Annual Valuation Engagements Leading Capital Markets Advisor >$6 Billion Market Cap North America Europe and Middle East Asia-Pacific Atlanta Miami Amsterdam Madrid Beijing Sydney >$1 Billion Boston Minneapolis Dubai Milan Hong Kong Tokyo Annual Revenue Chicago New York Frankfurt Paris Singapore Dallas
    [Show full text]
  • The Pe & M&A Quarterly
    JUNE 2020 JUNE 2020 | ISSUE 4 THE PE & M&A QUARTERLY Quarterly News, Trends and Developments Off the Record “The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected all sectors in India and across the globe, except a few. Though initially it was expected that the pandemic would end in a few months, it appears that it will continue for a longer period. Many PE firms and strategic investors have paused or deferred or slowed down their investment plans for the next 6 to 8 months. However, there are exceptions in case of a few. The deal making activity in India appears uncertain for the remainder of this year. On the M&A side, domestic deals are being evaluated. It is getting harder to close transactions in view of mismatch in expectations of the seller and buyer. The present situation has forced them to realign their objectives and expectations. In signed deals, material adverse change clauses are being evaluated, and in new deals it is being made as exhaustive as possible to ensure possible exit in case of change in environment. The overall structure of doing deals is going through a change and the focus is shifting to value creation and sustainability. There is a reasonable possibility that towards the end of the year, if we return to some sense of normalcy, there will be a significant increase in M&A and PE activity.” Satish Kishanchandani, Managing Partner FEATURED JUDGEMENT Banyan Tree Growth Capital vs Axiom Cordages Limited and Ors. 1 ISSUE 4 JUNE 2020 LEGAL UPDATES NON-FATF MEMBERS ALLOWED TO REGISTER AS CATEGORY I-FPI SEBI Updates April 07, 2020: The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) has relaxed the rules with respect to SNAPSHOT offshore funds seeking to get registered under the • For all relevant COVID-19 relaxations in “properly regulated” Foreign Portfolio Investor (“FPI”) compliances permitted by SEBI, visit our category.
    [Show full text]
  • RBSA India Deals Snapshot – February 2015
    India Deals IndiaSnapshot Deals FEBRUARYSnapshot 2015 November 2014 Index Snapshot of Mergers & Acquisitions Update for 4 February 2015 Mergers & Acquisitions Deals for February, 2015 5 - 7 Summary of Mergers & Acquisitions Update 8 Snapshot of PE / VC Update for February, 2015 10 - 12 PE / VC Deals for February, 2015 13 - 20 Summary of PE / VC Update 21 Real Estate Deals for February, 2015 23 RBSA Range of Services 24 Contact Us 25 Merger & Acquisition Update 3 Snapshot of Mergers & Acquisitions Update for FEBRUARY 2015 Acquirer Target Sector Stake Rs. (In Cr.) Sila Solutions Private Ltd. Evocare Pest Control Solutions Others 51% N.A. Exotel Techcom Pvt. Ltd. Blank Page Innovations Pvt. Ltd. IT/ITES N.A. N.A. AliPay (China) Internet Technology One97 Communications Ltd. IT/ITES 25% N.A. Company Ltd. Foodpanda GmbH JustEat Food & Beverages N.A. N.A. Warren Tea Ltd. Pressman Advertising Ltd. Media & Entertainment 8.52% ` 7 Cr. Future Consumer Enterprises Ltd. Integrated Food Park Private Ltd. Food & Beverages 28.86 N.A. Adfactors PR Pvt. Ltd. Yorke Communications IT/ITES N.A. N.A. RJ Corp iClinic Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. Healthcare N.A. N.A. Bigtree Entertainment Pvt. Ltd Eventifier Media & Entertainment N.A. ` 6.18 Cr. Quadragen Vet Health Private Ltd. Karnataka Nutraceutical Healthcare N.A. N.A. Ipca Laboratories Ltd. Krebs Biochemicals & Industries Ltd. Pharmaceuticals 16.73% ` 9.54 Cr. Natures Basket Ltd. EkStop Shop Pvt. Ltd. E-commerce N.A. N.A. Snapdeal Exclusively.in E-commerce 100% N.A. Tekni-Plex Inc., Ghiya Extrusions Private Ltd. Manufacturing N.A. N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 9Th March to 22Nd March 2019 BFSI Newsletter Investment and Exit
    9th March to 22nd March 2019 BFSI Newsletter Investment and Exit Indian Angel Network invests Rs. 3.5 crore in Pune-based automobile parts startup SparesHub 15TH March 2019.Zeebiz Indian Angel Network has invested Rs 3.5 crore in Pune-based start-up SparesHub, an automobile parts start-up. SparesHub will utilise the funds for its geographical expansion and to strengthen its technology capabilities...more Binny Bansal and others invest $ 65 mn in Acko general insurance 13TH March 2019.Asia Insurance Post Tech based general insurer Acko has raised $65 million in its Series C financing round, from Binny Bansal, co-founder of Flipkart; RPS Ventures, led by KabirMisra, ex- managing partner at Softbank; and Intact Ventures Inc. - corporate venture arm of Canada's largest property & casualty insurer...more Fund Raise Punjab & Sind Bank to raise equity capital of Rs 500 cr via QIP 15TH March 2019.Money Control State-owned Punjab & Sind Bankon Friday said it would raise up to Rs 500 crore by issuing fresh equity shares through qualified institutional placement...more Allahabad Bank looks to raise Rs 500 crore via non-core asset sale 16TH March 2019.Business Standard Allahabad Bank expects to raise about Rs 500 crore from the sale of its non-core assets. These assets include the bank's 28.52 per cent stake in Universal Sompo General Insurance, and about 12 properties across India...more Karur Vysya Bank Raises Rs 487 Cr 13TH March 2019.Business world Karur Vysya Bank on Wednesday said it has raised Rs 487 crore through Basel-III compliant bonds to fund its growth plans.
    [Show full text]
  • The 58 Most Active Venture Capital Firms for Startups in India
    The 58 Most Active Venture Capital Firms For Startups In India (and their investing patterns) ©2018 Inc42 All Rights Reserved Feel free to share this ebook without modification. 1 Introduction Once a startup has reached the growth stage, its most important requirement is undoubtedly the backing by reliable investors and an ample amount of funding to scale up. Though the concept of starting up has gained momentum recently, the small number of investors willing to show their trust and invest in new ventures has been a problem for startups. Many startups find it difficult to approach venture capitalists and quite a few times the investment structure of the investor is inadequate for the startup. So in this document, we bring to you the much needed list of the most active institutional investors and capital funds in India along with their investment capacity, investment structure, investment industries and some of their most notable portfolio startups. 2 Helion Venture Partners Investing in technology-powered and consumer service businesses, Helion Ventures Partners is a $605 Mn Indian- focused, an early to mid-stage venture fund participating in future rounds of financing in syndication with other venture partners. People You Should Know: Sandeep Fakun, Kanwaljit Singh. Investment Structure: Invests between $2 Mn to $10 Mn in each company with less than $10 Mn in revenues. Industries: Outsourcing, Mobile, Internet, Retail Services, Healthcare, Education and Financial Services. Startups Funded: Yepme, MakemyTrip, NetAmbit, Komli, TAXI For Sure, PubMatic. Contact Details: 8040183333, 01244615333, 3 Accel Partners Accel Partners founded in 1983 has global presence in Palo Alto, London , New York, China and India.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Deal List
    Annual Deal List 16th annual edition Contents Section Page Mergers & Acquisitions 04 1. Domestic 05 2. Inbound 15 3. Merger & Internal Restructuring 18 4. Outbound 19 Private Equity 23 QIP 67 IPO 69 Disclaimer This document captures the list of deals announced based on the information available in the public domain. Grant Thornton Bharat LLP does not take any responsibility for the information, any errors or any decision by the reader based on this information. This document should not be relied upon as a substitute for detailed advice and hence, we do not accept responsibility for any loss as a result of relying on the material contained herein. Further, our analysis of the deal values is based on publicly available information and appropriate assumptions (wherever necessary). Hence, if different assumptions were to be applied, the outcomes and results would be different. This document contains the deals announced and/or closed as of 23 December 2020. Please note that the criteria used to define Indian start-ups include a) the company should have been incorporated for five years or less than five years as at the end of that particular year and b) the company is working towards innovation, development, deployment and commercialisation of new products, processes or services driven by technology or intellectual property. Deals have been classified by sectors and by funding stages based on certain assumptions, wherever necessary. Dealtracker editorial team Pankaj Chopda and Monica Kothari Our methodology for the classification of deal type is as follows: Minority stake - 1%-25% | Strategic stake - 26%-50% | Controlling stake - 51%-75% | Majority stake - 76%-99% Maps are for graphical purposes only.
    [Show full text]
  • Grant Thornton India LLP
    Dealtracker Providing M&A and Private Equity Deal Insights 8th Annual Edition 2012 © Grant Thornton India LLP. All rights reserved. This document captures the list of deals announced based on information available in the public domain and based on public announcements. Grant Thornton India LLP does not take any responsibility for the information, any errors or any decision by the reader based on this information. This document should not be relied upon as a substitute for detailed advise and hence, we do not accept responsibility for any loss as a result of relying on the material contained herein. Further, our analysis of the deal values are based on publicly available information and based on appropriate assumptions (wherever necessary). Hence, if different assumptions were to be applied, the outcomes and results would be different. © Grant Thornton India LLP. All rights reserved. 2 Contents From the 4 - Foreword Editor's Desk 6 - Year Round Up 2012: 10 – M&A Round Up Mergers & 15 – Domestic Acquisitions 17 – Cross border 1001 25 – PE Round Up Private 27 – Top Deals Equity 29 – PE – Sector Highlight 31 – PE – City Break up deals Other 33 – IPO & QIP Features 35 – Deal List $49bn © Grant Thornton India LLP. All rights reserved. 3 Foreword The on-going Eurozone worries, weakening rupee and Contrary to expectations, inbound deal activity reverted a uncertain Indian economy with a slowdown in the to the single-digit levels seen in 2010, notching up US$ reform process, impacted M&A deal activity in certain 7 bn in deal value, after putting in a robust performance periods of 2012.
    [Show full text]