Fulltextthesis.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fulltextthesis.Pdf ENVIRONMENTAL INJUSTICE? AN ANALYSIS OF GENDER IN ENVIRONMENTAL NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANISATIONS (ENGOs) IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND TURKEY A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Rakibe Külcür School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University September 2012 Attended conferences and papers given: • 12 - 15 June 2007 - participation in the Greenweek ‘changing our behaviour’ organized by the EU Commission, DG Environment, Brussels, Belgium • 28 August 2007: Gendered spaces of further and higher education at the Centre for Human Geography, Brunel University; London, UK • 29 - 31 August 2007 - paper on ‘gender in ENGOs’ at PERGPGF1 (Postgraduate Research on Planning, the Environment and Sustainable Development) AC2007 RGS- IBG Annual International Conference, London, UK • 14 - 19 April 2008 - paper on ‘women in decision-making: governmental bodies; international organisations; ENGOs and grassroots activism in EJ movement”, AAG Conference, Boston, USA • 1 May 2008 - display of research poster on ‘women’s Invisibility in the environmental movement’ at Brunel University, London, UK • 27 - 29 April 2009 – paper on ‘Çevresel adaletsizlik? Türkiye ve İngiltere’deki çevre örgütlerinin cinsiyet faktörü açısından sorgulanması’. 2nd International Symposium on Women, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın, Turkey • 18 - 19 March 2010 - paper on ‘gender and climate change in ENGOs in the UK and Turkey’ at the workshop on gender, power and climate change, Lund, Sweden • 21 - 23 June 2010 - paper on ‘gender in British ENGOs’ - Gender, Work and Organization 2010 - 6th Biennial International Interdisciplinary Conference, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK • 1 - 3 September 2010 - paper on ‘research methodology’ - IBG Conference, London, UK i Publications • Buckingham, S., Kulcur, R. 2009 Gendered Geographies of Environmental Injustice (Antipode Special Issue: Spaces of Environmental Justice, volume 41 issue 4 • Buckingham, S., Kulcur, R. 2010 Gendered Geographies of Environmental Injustice in Ryan Holifield, Michael Porter and Gordon Walker ‘Spaces of Environmental Justice’, Wiley-Blackwell (Chichester) • Külçür, R. 2010 Çevresel adaletsizlik? Türkiye ve İngiltere’deki çevre örgütlerinin cinsiyet faktörü açısından sorgulanması, in the Book ‘2nd International Symposium on Women’, University of Adnan Menderes, Aydın/Turkey (proceedings) • Kulcur, R. January 2012 Turkey aims to harmonize its chemical legislation with the EU REACH and CLP regulation, Environmental Expert (the Environmental Industry online) ii Abstract In this thesis I investigate gender in environmental non-governmental organisations (ENGOs) in the United Kingdom (UK) and Turkey. ENGOs play an increasingly important role as lobbyists on environmental policy making at national and international scales. There is large literature dealing with gender inequalities in governing bodies, and in organisations. However, gender structures of ENGOs and their implications for campaigns have been under-researched. I therefore examined the structure and composition of ENGOs in the UK and Turkey, how far they include women in decision-making process and the implications for their campaigns. To this end, I undertook cross-national comparative research applying feminist research methodology to explore differences and similarities and underlying factors for gender inequalities in organisational settings in two different societies. The research methods included 38 interviews and one focus group interview in 9 ENGOs in the UK and 40 interviews in 10 ENGOs in Turkey. These were conducted mainly with senior managers, but also with junior managers and staff. Furthermore, I placed myself as a volunteer and researcher in two ENGOs, one in the UK and one in Turkey in order to observe the organisational practices directly and to enable triangulation of data. In addition, I collected secondary data from annual reports, staff charts, publications and websites of the organisations to collect data on gender compositions as well as campaigns of the ENGOs. In order to explore and provide sufficient explanation for the under-representation of female senior managers and gender inequalities in ENGOs settings, theoretical approaches were looked into in order to find the most appropriate feminist theories that explain the gendered nature of ENGOs. I found that while the ENGO sectors in iii both countries are dominated by female employees, white, middle class men are in charge of the decision-making in the ENGOs. Moreover, in the ENGOs I found that there seemed to be resistance to integrate gender related perspectives when deciding environmental campaigns. Since there is no research on ENGOs that makes gender blindness visible, this thesis is an attempt to fill that gap. I argue that neglecting gender relations in environmental decision-making and campaigns reinforces the current gendered practices and imbalances in ENGOs that fail to integrate women’s perspectives in environmental policies. iv Contents Attended conferences and papers given: ..................................................................... i Publications................................................................................................................. ii Abstract ....................................................................................................................... iii Contents ..................................................................................................................... v List of Figures ............................................................................................................ xii Acronyms .................................................................................................................. xiii Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... xvi LIST OF TABLES ...................................................................................................... XI CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 1 1.1. Situating the research .......................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Scope and aims of the thesis ......................................................................... 3 1.1.2. Research Questions ...................................................................................... 5 1.1.3. Research locations ........................................................................................ 7 1.1.4. Methodology .................................................................................................. 8 1.1.5. Original contribution of the research .............................................................. 9 1.2. Structure of the thesis ........................................................................................ 12 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 1 – GENDER AND ENVIRONMENT ............ 16 2.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 16 2.2. Ecofeminism ...................................................................................................... 17 v 2.3. Feminist political ecology ................................................................................... 24 2.4. Gender and Environmental Justice .................................................................... 27 2.4.1. ENGOs and environmental justice issues.................................................... 30 2.5. Summary and conclusions ................................................................................. 36 CHAPTER 3 LITERATURE REVIEW 2 – GENDERED NATURE OF ORGANISATIONS .................................................................................................... 37 3.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 37 3.2. Feminist organisation theories ........................................................................... 40 3.2.1. Liberal feminist organisation theory ............................................................. 41 3.2.2. Radical feminist organisation theory ............................................................ 46 3.2.3. Marxist/socialist feminism on organisation................................................... 49 3.2.4. Post-structuralist theory ............................................................................... 52 3.2.5. Setting the theoretical context ..................................................................... 55 3.3. Organisational reasons for gender inequalities (meso-level perspectives) ........ 59 3.3.1. Organisational structures ............................................................................. 59 3.4. Gender denial .................................................................................................... 72 3.5. Implications of gender diversity in management ................................................ 73 3.6. Summary and conclusions ................................................................................. 76 CHAPTER 4 METHODOLOGY ................................................................................ 78 4.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 78 4.2. Choosing the appropriate research methodology .............................................. 79 vi 4.3. Methodology .....................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Feminism, Feminist Scholarship, and Social Integration of Women: the Trs Uggle for African- American Women Jilly M
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 5 | Issue 5 Article 7 Jun-2004 Feminism, Feminist Scholarship, and Social Integration of Women: The trS uggle for African- American Women Jilly M. Ngwainmbi Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Ngwainmbi, Jilly M. (2004). Feminism, Feminist Scholarship, and Social Integration of Women: The trS uggle for African-American Women. Journal of International Women's Studies, 5(5), 93-104. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol5/iss5/7 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2004 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Feminism, Feminist Scholarship, and Social Integration of Women: The Struggle for African-American Women. By Jilly M. Ngwainmbii Abstract This paper focuses on the intellectual and scholarly basis of the struggle for social integration of African-American women into American society. Feminism is viewed as the broad context within which this struggle must be conceived, understood, and sustained. Because the struggle is conceptualized as intellectually driven, the paper begins by critically examining feminist scholarship and the contention that feminist scholarship provides the basis for social integration of African-American women into male-dominated American society. A distinct contribution of this paper to the current scholarship is a proposed framework for a process of social integration of African-American women, one which draws on the works and experiences of African-American women in general, and those in academe in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • International Research and Exchanges Board Records
    International Research and Exchanges Board Records A Finding Aid to the Collection in the Library of Congress Prepared by Karen Linn Femia, Michael McElderry, and Karen Stuart with the assistance of Jeffery Bryson, Brian McGuire, Jewel McPherson, and Chanté Wilson-Flowers Manuscript Division Library of Congress Washington, D.C. 2011 International Research and Exchanges Board Records Page ii Collection Summary Title: International Research and Exchanges Board Records Span Dates: 1947-1991 (bulk 1956-1983) ID No: MSS80702 Creator: International Research and Exchanges Board Creator: Inter-University Committee on Travel Grants Extent: 331,000 items; 331 cartons; 397.2 linear feet Language: Collection material in English and Russian Repository: Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C. Abstract: American service organization sponsoring scholarly exchange programs with the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the Cold War era. Correspondence, case files, subject files, reports, financial records, printed matter, and other records documenting participants’ personal experiences and research projects as well as the administrative operations, selection process, and collaborative projects of one of America’s principal academic exchange programs. International Research and Exchanges Board Records Page iii Contents Collection Summary .......................................................... ii Administrative Information ......................................................1 Organizational History..........................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • A Feminist Critique to Knowledge Production
    Università degli studi di Napoli “L’Orientale” A feminist critique to knowledge production edited by Silvana Carotenuto, Renata Jambrešic´ Kirin and Sandra Prlenda NAPOLI 2014 Proprietà letteraria riservata © Napoli 2014 Tutti i diritti di riproduzione sono riservati. Sono pertanto vietate la conservazione in sistemi reperimento dati e la riproduzione o la trasmissione anche parziale, in qualsiasi forma e mezzo (elettronico, meccanico, incluse fotocopie e registrazioni) senza il previo consenso scritto dell’editore. A FEMINIST CRITIQUE TO KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION — 3 Table of contents Editorial Introduction by Silvana Carotenuto, Renata Jambrešić Kirin and Sandra Prlenda ..................................................................... 5 From UNESCO Humanistic Ideals to Antiracialist Politics of Knowledge Marina Gržinić, For an Antiracist Politics of Knowledge: Elaborating on Transfeminism and Black Theoretical Thought ............................. 21 Biljana Kašić and Sandra Prlenda, A Curious Act of Knowing? Obstacles to the Politicality of Feminist Cognition and Feminist Traces within the Academia in Croatia .............................................. 39 Naila Ceribašić, UNESCO’s Program of Intangible Cultural Heritage, Women, and the Issue of Gender Equality ......................................... 000 Karmen Špiljak, Non-formal Educational Methodology as a Tool for Emancipatory and Feminist Thought ................................................ 000 Three Key Words in Transnational Feminism: Ethics, Politics and Critique Vita
    [Show full text]
  • PD Dr. Harald Bichlmeier Publikationen (Stand 30.04.2016)
    PD Dr. Harald Bichlmeier Publikationen (Stand 30.04.2016) I. Monographien 2011: M01 Ablativ, Lokativ und Instrumental im Jungavestischen – ein Beitrag zur altiranischen Kasussyntax [zugl. Dissertation Würzburg; eingereicht im April 2010]. (Studien zur historisch-vergleichenden Sprachwissenschaft 1 [ISSN 2192-0133]). Hamburg: Baar- Verlag 2011. Paperback, 437 S. ISBN 978-3-935536-59-2. Preis: 78, ‒ €. [am 11.5.2011 ausgezeichnet mit einem Preis aus der Unterfränkischen Gedenkjahr- stiftung für Wissenschaft 2011] [am 18.9.2012 auf der 14. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft „Etymology and the European Lexicon“ (Kopenhagen, 17.–22.9.2012) ausgezeichnet mit dem Preis der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft für die beste Dissertation im Bereich Indo- germanistik für das Jahr 2011] Rezensionen: Hintze, Almut, in: Journal of Indo-European Studies 40, 2012, S. 457–464. (online unter: http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/15670/) Dieu, Eric, in: Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris , 108/2, 2013, S. 163 ‒166. 2014: M02 Studien zur Verwendung der Lokalpartikeln im Mykenischen . Wiesbaden: Dr.-Ludwig- Reichert-Verlag 2014. Gebunden, X, 136 S. ISBN 978-3-95490-012-1. Preis: 39,‒ €. Rezensionen: Jiménez Delgado, José Miguel, in Bryn Mawr Classical Review 2014.12.19 (http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2014/2014-12-19.html; 20.01.2015) Sturm, Laura, in: Das Altertum 60, 2015, S. 65–67. II. Beiträge zu Nachschlagewerken etc. II.1 Beiträge zu Wörterbüchern, Lexika u.ä.: 2002: Mitarbeit an dem Sammelband: Schrift, Sprache, Bild und Klang – Entwicklungsstufen der Schrift von der Antike bis in die Neuzeit . Hrsg. von Ulrich Sinn. Katalog zur Sonder- ausstellung der Fakultät für Altertums- und Kulturwissenschaften der Universität Würzburg vom 23.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Ecology: Doing, Undoing, and Redoing Gender in Science
    http://genderandset.open.ac.uk Feminist ecology: Doing, undoing, and redoing gender in science Amy S. Teller, Apollonya M. Porcelli Brown University, USA ABSTRACT Women continue to be underrepresented in STEM fields and also are more likely to leave academic careers than men. While much existing sociological research on gender in science focuses on structures, institutions, and policies, we take a cultural and phenomenological approach to the question. We focus on the interaction between structural and micro-sociological forces that uphold existing gender inequalities and drive new forms of inequality within the discipline of ecology by tracing the experience of female graduate students. Ecology in the United States and elsewhere is currently undergoing three shifts, well documented by previous studies—more female scientists, interdisciplinary work, and research in human- altered landscapes—that comprise a transition to what we call “feminist ecology.” We ask whether these disciplinary-level shifts in ecology are accompanied by renegotiations in the way ecologists “do gender” as they work. In this paper we argue that despite structural changes toward a feminist ecology, gender inequalities are not eliminated. Our data collected using ethnographic and autoethnographic methods during ecological fieldwork in the Northeastern United States, show that gender inequality persists through daily interactions, shaping the way that fieldwork is conducted and bodies are policed. We provide additional evidence of the way that ecologists and non-ecologists interact during fieldwork, highlighting the embeddedness of scientific disciplines within larger societal forces. Thus, the question of women in science cannot be understood strictly from within the bounds of science but extends to gender relations in society at large.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminism and Feminist Scholarship in Academe: Women’S Struggle for Recognition Continues in Sociology
    Greener Journal of Social Sciences ISSN: 2276-7800 Vol. 2 (2), pp. 050-065, May 2012. Research Article Feminism and Feminist Scholarship in Academe: Women’s Struggle for Recognition continues in Sociology. Jilly M. Ngwainmbi Department of Sociology, Fayetteville State University, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301. Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper focuses on feminism and feminist scholarship as basic frameworks for women’s struggles for recognition in academe in general and in sociology in particular. A distinct contribution of the paper to the current literature is the focus on the theory-perspective distinction in sociology as one of the major focuses of women’s struggle for recognition in academe in general and in sociology in particular. After a careful and critical examination of the classical roots, varieties, basic domain assumptions of feminist theory, theoretical and methodological arguments for and against a feminist perspective in sociology, the following conclusions are drawn: 1) feminist theory must be recognized and accepted for its significant contribution to the birth and development of sociology and its major role in helping to broaden the field of sociology and provide a broader and better understanding of society, the individual in society, and various social phenomena; 2) however, there is no sound sociological grounds for the establishment of a separate, distinct feminist perspective in sociology; and 3) it is necessary to clearly separate feminism in its activist form from legitimate feminist scholarship in sociology in order to preserve and maintain the integrity of the discipline as a legitimate science. Keywords: Feminism, Feminist Scholarship, Feminist Theory, Theory, Theoretical Perspective Introduction The history of women’s subjugation, domination and oppression is a long and painful one, involving all forms of discrimination and exclusionary practices used by men.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate the Senate Met at 3 P.M
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 116 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 165 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 9, 2019 No. 143 Senate The Senate met at 3 p.m. and was Washington is where we come to work. of nominations to important Federal called to order by the President pro We come here to fight for our neigh- offices. The American people deserve to tempore (Mr. GRASSLEY). bors and for the places we love and are be governed by the government they f proud to hail from. voted for, and every time we confirm The American people know this is a another one of the uncontroversial, PRAYER highly charged political moment. They amply qualified public servants whom The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- haven’t sent us here to stage pitched President Trump has selected for these fered the following prayer: battles or score political points. They executive branch posts, we fulfill a Let us pray. elected us to make a difference for constitutional responsibility and make Almighty God, sovereign of our Na- them and their families. We do that by manifest the people’s decision. tion and Lord of our lives, thank You taking care of the people’s business and Of course, in the days and weeks for infusing us with the confidence that by collaborating in good faith to com- ahead, another major duty before us You order our steps each day. plete our work and attend to the press- will be the appropriations process.
    [Show full text]
  • Jake Barrett #Teamtiff Nate Shutter #Teamtiff Ryan Scicchitano
    Jake Barrett #teamTiff Nate Shutter #teamTiff Ryan Scicchitano #teamTiff William Sheffield #teamTiff Liam Morrison 02-488 Attached Track Club Theresa Green White 1220 Buffalo Run christoher van dyke 2019 Spirit of Pre saline high school Chadrick Toyloy 344 Prospect Ian Brown 344 Prospect St. Brianna Brand 360 Elite Speed Garvin Tolbert Jr. 360 Elite Speed Camille Talbert 36Elite MOVES jon Andrew Coulter 4 Mula Track Club Noelani Phillips 5 Star Alex Rayson 620 Running Annie Burton 620 Running Dylan Schieffelin 620 Running Jordan Mathis 620 Running Debrielle Williams A C Flora High Ariyana Tisdale A C Flora High School Kaitlyn A. Croffie A C Flora High School Chase Balick Abington Friends School Jack Balick Abington Friends School Taalib Holloman Abington Friends School Samuel Shally abington friends school (AFS) Jaheem Hayles Abraham clark High School Victoria K. Williams AC Flora High School hajjah jackson academy of finace Jalen Wynn Academy of Holy Angels Adaine Allwood Achievement First Hartford High School Delaney Sullivan Acton Boxborough Regional High School Grace Withington Acton Boxborough Regional High School Ryan Forrest Acton-Boxborough Regional High School Napoleon Hernandez Adrenaline Track Club Athlete's Name Affiliation: Jamie Anne Macecevic Aim High Club Donald Jones Albany Academy brandon benton Alexander track club G. Nathanial Grimes Alexander track club Gabe Brown Alexander track club Jazzmin Taylor Alexander Track Club Jordan Watts alexander track club Kennedy Crawford Alexander track club Nate Grimes Alexander track club Quintin Brown Alexander track club Tavi Williams Alexander track club Theus Johnson alexander track club Tomisin John Alexander track club Josh Smith Alpena High School Austin Joyner Alpharetta High School Dylan R.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecologia Balkanica
    ECOLOGIA BALKANICA International Scientific Research Journal of Ecology Volume 7, Issue 1 June 2015 UNION OF SCIENTISTS IN BULGARIA – PLOVDIV UNIVERSITY OF PLOVDIV PUBLISHING HOUSE ii International Standard Serial Number Print ISSN 1314-0213; Online ISSN 1313-9940 Aim & Scope „Ecologia Balkanica” is an international scientific journal, in which original research articles in various fields of Ecology are published, including ecology and conservation of microorganisms, plants, aquatic and terrestrial animals, physiological ecology, behavioural ecology, population ecology, population genetics, community ecology, plant-animal interactions, ecosystem ecology, parasitology, animal evolution, ecological monitoring and bioindication, landscape and urban ecology, conservation ecology, as well as new methodical contributions in ecology. Studies conducted on the Balkans are a priority, but studies conducted in Europe or anywhere else in the World is accepted as well. Published by the Union of Scientists in Bulgaria – Plovdiv and the University of Plovdiv Publishing house – twice a year. Language: English. Peer review process All articles included in “Ecologia Balkanica” are peer reviewed. Submitted manuscripts are sent to two or three independent peer reviewers, unless they are either out of scope or below threshold for the journal. These manuscripts will generally be reviewed by experts with the aim of reaching a first decision as soon as possible. The journal uses the double anonymity standard for the peer-review process. Reviewers do not have to sign their reports and they do not know who the author(s) of the submitted manuscript are. We ask all authors to provide the contact details (including e-mail addresses) of at least four potential reviewers of their manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicer Arietinum L.), Its Ecology and Cultivation
    r/ CICER L, A MONOGRAPH OF THE GENUS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CHICKPEA {CICER ARIETINUM L.), ITS ECOLOGY AND CULTIVATION L. J. G. VAN DER MAESEN LAN!'/ . 11 GEN WAt;: CICER L., A MONOGRAPH OF THE GENUS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CHICKPEA {CICER ARIETINUM L.), ITS ECOLOGY AND CULTIVATION Dit proefschrift met stellingen van LAURENTIUS JOSEPHUS GERARDUS van der MAESEN landbouwkundig ingenieur, geboren te Amsterdam op 18 december 1944, is goedgekeurd door de promotoren Dr. Ir. J. D. Ferwerda, hoogleraar in de Tropische Landbouw- plantenteelt, Dr. H. C. D. de Wit, hoogleraar in de Algemene Planten- systematiek en -geografie, en in het bijzonder die van de Tropen en de Subtropen. De Rector Magnificus van de Landbouwhogeschool, H. A. LENIGER Wageningen, 4 September 1972 635.657 582.738:581.4/.6+581. 9 L. J. G. VAN DER MAESEN CICER L., A MONOGRAPH OF THE GENUS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CHICKPEA {CICER ARIETINUM L.), ITS ECOLOGY AND CULTIVATION PROEFSCHRIFT TER VERKRIJGING VAN DE GRAAD VAN DOCTOR IN DE LANDBOUWWETENSCHAPPEN, OPGEZA G VAN DE RECTOR MAGNIFICUS, PROF. DR. IR. H. A. LENIGER, HOOGLERAAR IN DE TECHNOLOGIE, IN HET OPENBAAR TE VERDEDIGEN OP WOENSDAG 11 OKTOBER 1972 TE 16.00 UUR IN DE AULA VAN DE LANDBOUWHOGESCHOOL TE WAGENINGEN H. VEENMAN &ZONE N N.V. - WAGENINGEN - 1972 This thesisi sals o published as Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen 72-10(1972 ) (Communications Agricultural University Wageningen, The Netherlands) Aanmijn ouders CONTENTS PREFACE 1. ORIGIN AND HISTORY OF THE CHICKPEA 1 1.1. Introduction 1 1.2. Prehistoric data 1 1.3. Written sources 2 1.4.
    [Show full text]
  • 200 Jennifer Adese (Indigenous Studies, Intersectionality, Women An
    Gender Comprehensive Exam List August 2020 Total Readings: 200 Jennifer Adese (indigenous studies, intersectionality, women and politics) Irene Boekmann (paid work, family) Hae Yeon Choo (global/transnational/postcolonial, sexuality, intersectionality) Cynthia Cranford (global labour, work and organizations, care work and social reproduction) Bonnie Fox (social reproduction, family, paid/unpaid work, body) Adam Green (sexuality, theory) Josée Johnston (unpaid work and social reproduction; gender and food; beauty) Anna Korteweg (state, global/transnational/postcolonial theory, violence) Melissa Milkie (family, household division of labour, culture) Rania Salem (family) Judith Taylor (social movements, organizations, intersectionality) I. Ways of thinking about gender On Capitalism and Patriarchy: Marxist-Feminist Approaches and Feminist Political Economy (10) Rubin, Gayle, 1975. “The Traffic in Women: Notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of Sex.” In Toward an Anthropology of Gender, ed. by Rayna Reiter. Monthly Review Press. [also in Karen V. Hansen and Ilene Philipson, eds., 1990. Women, Class and the Feminist Imagination. Temple University Press]. Luxton, Meg. 1980. More Than A Labour of Love. Chapter 3. Women’s Press. Hartmann, Heidi, 1981. “The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a More Progressive Union.” In Women and Revolution, ed. by Lydia Sargent. South End Press. Armstrong, Pat and Hugh Armstrong. 1987. “Beyond Sexless Class and Classless Sex: Toward Marxist Feminism” In The Politics of Diversity, ed. by Roberta Hamilton and Michele Barrett. Verso. [Omit pp. 213-24, on the ‘domestic labour debate.’] Fox, Bonnie, 1988. “Conceptualizing ‘Patriarchy’” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 25, 2:163-182. Laslett, Barbara and Johanna Brenner, 1989. “Gender and Social Reproduction: Historical Perspectives.” Annual Review of Sociology 15: 381-404 Pollert, Anna, 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Jauk Feminist Scholar Activism Goes Global
    Jauk Feminist Scholar Activism Goes Global Feminist Scholar-Activism Goes Global: Experiences of “Sociologists for Women in Society” at the UN Daniela Jauk University of Graz Abstract This article focuses on the experiences and strategies of members of Sociologists for Women in Society (SWS) who strive to bridge the worlds of social activism and academia. It concerns the International Committee’s work at the United Nations (UN), specifically at the annual Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) meeting. It builds on transnational feminist literature that has discussed the UN as stage for a diverse global women’s movement and provider of global gender equality norms that, if utilized, advance gender equality in its member states. I analyze themes that emerged from a sample of in-depth interviews with current or former UN scholar-activists within SWS from a larger ethnographic study, and present experiences and challenges of SWS members’ engagement with UN politics and policy development since the mid-nineties. I demonstrate that SWS does justice to its mission of serving as an activist organization through its work in the global arena. Analysis of interviews, observations, and archival material demonstrates that SWS’s UN scholar- activism is increasing the visibility and applicability of feminist sociology. While this activism critically examines the discourse, it also disrupts hegemonic discourse and offers opportunities for concrete social change, particularly through linking activism, mentoring, and teaching. Keywords: United Nations, Feminist Sociology, Global Feminism, Transnational Scholar- activism Author bio: Daniela Jauk is visiting Assistant Professor in the Department of Education at the University of Graz/Austria and an activist/educator in local and transnational feminist communities.
    [Show full text]