DOCSLIB.ORG

Descendants of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Descendants of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann Generation 1 1. JOHANN BERNARD1 WIECHELMANN was born on 16 Jan 1767 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. He died on 24 Jan 1838 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. He married Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg on 08 Nov 1796 in Oldenburg, Germany. She was born on 06 Feb 1776 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. She died on 27 Feb 1852 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg had the following children: 1.1. BERNARD HEINRICH2 WIECHELMAN (son of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg) was born on 08 Jul 1797 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. He died on 05 Oct 1873 in Padua, Washington Twp., Mercer Co., OH. More About Bernard Heinrich Wiechelman: 1834 Immigration: 30 Jun 1834 in Arrived at the Port of Baltimore; B.H. Mutchelman 36, Johann 28, Catherine 26, Maria Anne 21, Joh. Clemmens 17. (Last name should be Wiechelman). Burial: St. Anthony Catholic Cemetery, Padua, Mercer Co., OH 1.2. MARY ANNA WIECHELMAN (daughter of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg) was born on 08 Sep 1799 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. She died on 09 Oct 1873 in Padua, Washington Twp., Mercer Co., OH. More About Mary Anna Wiechelman: 1852 Immigration: 27 Oct 1852 in Bremen Bark Aelous arrived at New Orleans on 26 October 1852, Marianne Wiegelmann 53, with Ludwig Wiegelmann 42, Anna Marie 25, Elizabeth 5, all from Lohne. 1870 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: Anna Wickelman 71 b: Attenberg (infirm) residing with Lewis Wickelman 61 b: Attenberg, farmer and his family. Burial: St. Anthony Catholic Cemetery, Padua, Mercer Co., OH 1.3. JOHN HENRY WIECHELMAN (son of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg) was born on 27 Sep 1802 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. He died on 22 Dec 1884 in Padua, Mercer Co., OH. He married Maria Catherine Roemer on 08 Jun 1838 in Cincinnati, Hamilton Co., OH. She was born about 1806 in Grosan, Oldenburg, Germany. She died on 30 Dec 1876 in Padua, Mercer Co., OH. More About John Henry Wiechelman: 1832 Immigration: 06 Sep 1832 in Port of Bremen, Germany to Port of Philadelphia, Ship Adler, #13 J. H. Wichelmann 29 mechanic. 1850 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: John H. Wechelman 48 b: Germany; Cath 42 b: Germany; Henry 11 b: OH; Benj 9 b: OH; Eliz 7 b: OH; Mary 7 b: OH; Clements 1 b: OH. 1860 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: John Weichelman (Walman) 59 b: Oldenburg, farmer; Mary 52 b: Oldenburg; Henry 21; Bernard 19; Mary 17; Elizabeth 17; Clemence 11; children b: OH. 1870 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: John H. Weckelman 67 b: Oldenburg, farmer; Mary 56 b: Oldenburg; Bernard 28 b: OH, farm laborer; Clemmons 20 b: OH, farm laborer. 1880 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: John H. Winchelman 78 b: Prussia, living with son Clem 30 b: OH, dau-in-law Mary 26 b: Prussia, nephew Clemence 19 b: OH; William Wellman 22 b: Prussia, brother-in-law to Clem; (Clem & Clemence listed as cousins). Burial: St. Anthony Catholic Cemetery, Padua, Mercer Co., OH Notes for John Henry Wiechelman: History of Mercer County, Ohio, and Representative Citizens, Volume 1, Edited and Compiled by Hon. S.S. Scranton, Celina, Ohio ... page 226 "St. Anthony's Church at Padua in Washington township -- The pioneer priests of the congregation of the Most Precious Blood, founded by blessed Gaspare del Bufalo in Italy in 1815, and introduced into Page 1 of 4 Generation 1 (con't) the Most Precious Blood, founded by blessed Gaspare del Bufalo in Italy in 1815, and introduced into this country in the year 1844 by Rev. Francis Salesius Brunner, C.PP.S, were the first to administer to the spiritual wants of the few scattered Catholics in this territory, now known as St. Anthony's parish. The first priest (at St. Anthony's), Rev. Joseph Albrecht, C.PP.S., came from St. Joseph's parish, in Recovery township, Mercer County, and held divine services in the house of John Stelzer, in Indiana, and in the houses of Henry Wickelman and Anton Schnett, situated near the present St. Anthony's Church. A movement for the erection of a log church was first started in the fall of 1852 by the following men: Heinrich Schroer, Heinrich Wickelman, John Stelzer, John Weichelman, Vinzenz Stark, John Driller, Louis Wickelman, Anton Schnett, Ignatz Rauh and Heinrich Fortmann." More About Maria Catherine Roemer: Burial: St. Anthony Catholic Cemetery, Padua, Mercer Co., OH 1.4. JOHANNES HERMAN WIECHELMAN (son of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg) was born on 30 Oct 1805 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. He died on 17 Sep 1838 in Minster, Auglaize Co., OH. He married Anna Mary Catherine Mooreman on 19 Apr 1836 in Cincinnati, Hamilton Co., OH. She was born about 1816 in Prussia. She died in 1846 in Minster, Auglaize Co., OH. More About Johannes Herman Wiechelman: 1834 Immigration: 30 Jun 1834 in Arrived at the Port of Baltimore; B.H. Mutchelman 36, Johann 28, Catherine 26, Maria Anne 21, Joh. Clemmens 17. (Last name should be Wiechelman). 1.5. MARY CATHERINE ELIZABETH WIECHELMAN (daughter of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg) was born on 29 Jan 1808 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. She died in 1884 in Minster, Auglaize Co., OH. She married John Bernard Friedrichs on 11 Aug 1835 in Holy Trinity Church, Cincinnati, Hamilton Co., OH. He was born on 09 Oct 1798 in Oythe, Oldenburg, Germany. He died before 1860 in Minster, Auglaize Co., OH. More About Mary Catherine Elizabeth Wiechelman: 1834 Immigration: 30 Jun 1834 in Arrived at the Port of Baltimore; B.H. Mutchelman 36, Johann 28, Catherine 26, Maria Anne 21, Joh. Clemmens 17. (Last name should be Wiechelman). 1850 Census: Auglaize Co., OH, Town of Minster: John B. Fredrick 52 b: Germany; Mary 46 b: Germany; Josephine 13; Elizabeth 12; Bernard 9; Anthony 6; Francis 4; children b: OH. 1860 Census: Auglaize Co., OH, Minster Twp: Mary Fredrichs 56 b: Oldenberg; Frank 14 b: OH. 1870 Census: Auglaize Co., OH, Minster-Jackson Twp: Mary Fredricks 60 b: Prussia, no occupation; boarding with Henry & Agnes Gerson. 1880 Census: Auglaize Co., OH, Minster Village: Mary Friederich 72 b: Oldenberg (widow), boarding in Agnes Helmuth home. More About John Bernard Friedrichs: 1850 Census: Auglaize Co., OH, Town of Minster: John B. Fredrick 52 b: Germany; Mary 46 b: Germany; Josephine 13; Elizabeth 12; Bernard 9; Anthony 6; Francis 4; children b: OH. 1.6. JOHN LUDWIG 'LEWIS' WIECHELMAN (son of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg) was born on 20 Oct 1810 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. He died on 26 Jun 1885 in Washington Twp., Mercer Co., OH. He married (1) ANNA ELISABETH BUNDIEK on 03 Feb 1846 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. She was born on 27 Aug 1826 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. She died on 04 Jul 1848 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. He married (2) ANNA MARIE ELIZABETH SUDBECK on 26 Nov 1850 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. She was born on 05 Jul 1827 in Steinfeld, Oldenburg, Germany. She died on 05 May 1866 in Mercer Co., OH. He married (3) MARY ANNA HAGERT on 28 Oct 1868 in Mercer Co., OH. She was born in Oct 1817 in Germany. She died on 30 Nov 1903 in Mercer Co., OH. Page 2 of 4 Generation 1 (con't) More About John Ludwig 'Lewis' Wiechelman: 1852 Immigration: 27 Oct 1852 in Bremen Bark Aelous arrived at New Orleans on 26 October 1852, Marianne Wiegelmann 53, with Ludwig Wiegelmann 42, Anna Marie 25, Elizabeth 5, all from Lohne. 1870 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: Lewis Wickelman 61 b: Attenberg, farmer; Mary 49 b: Prussia; Henry 16 b: OH; Louis 11 b: OH; Clemmons 7 b: OH; Augustus Deppen 20; James Deppen 15; Mary Deppen 18; John Deppen 9; Anna Wickelman 71 b: Attenberg (infirm). 1880 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: Lewis Weichelman 70 b: Foreign; Mary 64 b: Prussia, wife; Lewis 20 b: OH, son; Frances G. Deppen 24 b: OH, step-daughter. (Son Clemence 19, living with cousin Clem & uncle John H. Wiechelman in Mercer Co.). Burial: St. Anthony Catholic Cemetery, Padua, Mercer Co., OH More About Anna Elisabeth Bundiek: Parent(s): Franz Heinrich Bundiek & Catharina Maria Kröger. More About Anna Marie Elizabeth Sudbeck: Burial: St. Anthony Catholic Cemetery, Padua, Mercer Co., OH More About Mary Anna Hagert: 1860 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Marion Twp: Theodore Deppen 50 b: Prussia, merchant; Anna 45 b: Prussia; Elizabeth 13 b: Prussia; Augustine 9 b: OH; Mary 5 b: OH; Frances 3 b: OH. 1870 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: Lewis Wickelman 61 b: Attenberg, farmer; Mary 49 b: Prussia; Henry 16 b: OH; Louis 11 b: OH; Clemmons 7 b: OH; Augustus Deppen 20; James Deppen 15; Mary Deppen 18; John Deppen 9; Anna Wickelman 71 b: Attenberg (infirm). 1880 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: Mary Weichelman 64 b: Prussia, wife; Lewis Weichelman 70 b: Foreign; Lewis Weichelman 20 b: OH, step-son; Frances G. Deppen 24 b: OH, daughter. 1900 Census: Mercer Co., OH, Washington Twp: Anna M. Wiechelman 82, capitalist, living with daughter Frances Schindler 46 (widow), farmer, & grandsons Louis B. Schindler 16, farm laborer; Edward J. Schindler 14, farm laborer. Burial: St. Anthony Catholic Cemetery, Padua, Mercer Co., OH 1.7. MARIA ANNA WIECHELMAN (daughter of Johann Bernard Wiechelmann and Maria Elizabeth Stukenborg) was born on 20 Jun 1813 in Lohne, Oldenburg, Germany. She died on 14 Aug 1886 in Dayton, Montgomery Co., OH. She married John Henry Fortman on 16 Feb 1836 in Cincinnati, Hamilton Co., OH.
Recommended publications
  • How Britain Unified Germany: Geography and the Rise of Prussia

    How Britain Unified Germany: Geography and the Rise of Prussia

    — Early draft. Please do not quote, cite, or redistribute without written permission of the authors. — How Britain Unified Germany: Geography and the Rise of Prussia After 1815∗ Thilo R. Huningy and Nikolaus Wolfz Abstract We analyze the formation oft he German Zollverein as an example how geography can shape institutional change. We show how the redrawing of the European map at the Congress of Vienna—notably Prussia’s control over the Rhineland and Westphalia—affected the incentives for policymakers to cooperate. The new borders were not endogenous. They were at odds with the strategy of Prussia, but followed from Britain’s intervention at Vienna regarding the Polish-Saxon question. For many small German states, the resulting borders changed the trade-off between the benefits from cooperation with Prussia and the costs of losing political control. Based on GIS data on Central Europe for 1818–1854 we estimate a simple model of the incentives to join an existing customs union. The model can explain the sequence of states joining the Prussian Zollverein extremely well. Moreover we run a counterfactual exercise: if Prussia would have succeeded with her strategy to gain the entire Kingdom of Saxony instead of the western provinces, the Zollverein would not have formed. We conclude that geography can shape institutional change. To put it different, as collateral damage to her intervention at Vienna,”’Britain unified Germany”’. JEL Codes: C31, F13, N73 ∗We would like to thank Robert C. Allen, Nicholas Crafts, Theresa Gutberlet, Theocharis N. Grigoriadis, Ulas Karakoc, Daniel Kreßner, Stelios Michalopoulos, Klaus Desmet, Florian Ploeckl, Kevin H.
  • Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union

    Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union

    Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union Unpublished manuscript. Do not circulate, quote, or cite, without permission! How Geography Unified Germany: Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union∗ y z THILO R. HUNING AND NIKOLAUS WOLF Abstract We analyze the foundation of the German Zollverein as an example how geography can shape institutional change. We show how the redrawing of the European map at the Congress of Vienna 1815—notably Prussia’s control over the Rhineland and Westphalia—affected the incentives for policymakers to cooperate. Our argument comes in three steps. First, we show that the new borders were not endogenous to trade. They were at odds with the strategy of Prussia in 1815, but followed from Britain’s intervention at Vienna regarding the Polish-Saxon question. Second, we develop a theoretical framework, where state planners set tariffs on imports and transits to maximize revenue. We show that in a world with transit tariffs a revenue-maximizing state planner faces a trade-off between benefits from cooperation and the cost of loosing geographical advantage. In a third step we calibrate the model combining historical data on tariffs, freight rates, market sizes with GIS data on lowest costs routes under endogenous tariffs. We then run counterfactuals to show how borders affected incentives: if Prussia would have succeeded with her strategy to gain the entire Kingdom of Saxony instead of the western provinces, the Zollverein would not have formed. We conclude that geography can shape institutional change. To put it differently, as a collateral damage to her intervention at Vienna “Britain unified Germany”.
  • The Kingdom of Wurttenmerg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871

    The Kingdom of Wurttenmerg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871

    Te Kingdom of Württemberg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871. Bodie Alexander Ashton School of History and Politics Discipline of History Te University of Adelaide Submitted for the postgraduate qualification of Doctor of Philosophy (History) May 2014 For Kevin and Ric; and for June, Malcolm and Kristian. Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgements ix List of Abbreviations xi Notes xiii Introduction 15 Chapter 1 35 States and Nation in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Chapter 2 67 Stuttgart and Vienna before 1848 Chapter 3 93 Te Kingdom of Württemberg and Early Kleindeutschland Chapter 4 123 Independence and South German Particularism, 1815-1848 Chapter 5 159 Te Years of Prophecy and Change, 1848-1849 Chapter 6 181 Counterrevolution, Reaction and Reappraisals, 1850-1859 Chapter 7 207 Six Years of Autumn: 1860-1866 Chapter 8 251 Te Unification of Germany, 1866-1871 Conclusion 295 Bibliography 305 ABSTRACT _ THE TRADITIONAL DISCOURSE of the German unification maintains that it was the German great powers - Austria and Prussia - that controlled German destiny, yet for much of this period Germany was divided into some thirty-eight states, each of which possessed their own institutions and traditions. In explaining the formation of Germany, the orthodox view holds that these so-called Mittel- and Kleinstaaten existed largely at the whim of either Vienna or Berlin, and their policies, in turn, were dictated or shaped by these two power centres. According to this reading of German history, a bipolar sociopolitical structure existed, whereby the Mittelstaaten would declare their allegiances to either the Habsburg or Hohenzollern crowns. Te present work rejects this model of German history, through the use of the case study of the southwestern Kingdom of Württemberg.
  • Harbort Amelung

    Harbort Amelung

    Harbort Amelung by Marcine Lohman Table of Contents NGS Quarterly Report of Harbort Amelung .............................................................2 Descendant Tree of Harbort Amelung....................................................................57 Index.............................................................................................................................143 1 Harbort Amelung Descendants of Harbort Amelung Generation No. 1 1. Harbort1 Amelung was born 1430 in Hameln, Germany1, and died 1492 in Germany1. He married Elisabeth N. 1455 in Germany1. She was born 1435 in Germany1, and died 1515 in Germany1. Notes for Harbort Amelung: This line being researched by Dirk Dumrese, e-mail: [email protected] and Agnes Weiske, e- mail: [email protected] Amelung, Amelang, Ameling, Ahmling u.ä.: Amelungen heißen in der Heldensage die Mannen Dietrichs von Bern, auch die Nachkommen der Gotenherrscher, der Amaler, in deren Geschlecht die Namen mit Amal- (»Tatkraft, Energie«) beliebt waren, Amala-ricus, Amala-frida, -berga, -swintha, Angehörige Theoderichs d. Gr.; auch Amelolt, Held Dietrichs, wird im mhd. Gedicht »Rosengarten« C Amelung genannt. Zur Endung -ung siehe Adelung! Um 1100/1300 in Süd u. Nord, bei Adel, Bürgern u. Bauern war Adelung beliebter Name. Noch um 1600 nennt der Kieler Bürgermster. Amelung von Lengerke s. Sohn gleichfalls Amelung! Siehe auch Amelrich, Amelbrecht. English Translation: Amelung, Amelang, Ameling, Ahmling u.ä.: Amelungen as called in the hero's legend Mannen Dietrich of Berne, also the descendants of the Goth rulers, the Amaler in whose gender the names with Amal-(" energy ") were popular, Amala-ricus, Amala-Frida,-berga,- swintha, members Theoderichs d. Gr.; also Amelolt, hero of Dietrich, is called in mhd. the poem " rose garden " C Amelung. For the ending ung see Adelung! , Adelung was a popular name around 1100/1300 in the north and south, with nobility, castles and farmers.
  • Infant Mortality in Germany in the 19Th Century

    Infant Mortality in Germany in the 19Th Century

    Comparative Population Studies – Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft Vol. 36, 4 (2011): 839-868 (Date of release: 01.11.2012) Infant Mortality in Germany in the 19th Century Rolf Gehrmann* Abstract: Developments in infant mortality in Germany have previously only been documented in a fragmentary fashion for the 19th century as a whole, and only on a small scale for the period prior to 1871. For the fi rst time, this paper lays a solid statistical foundation by reprocessing the fi gures assembled by the German states of that time. The reconstructed national statistical series (from 1826 onwards) re- veals a comparatively high infant mortality, with minor deviations until the turn of the 20th century. The impact of urbanisation and industrialisation is not denied, but an evaluation of the different regional patterns and trends leads to a new weighting. The living and working conditions in the countryside were thus highly determin- ing. The relationship between fertility and infant mortality is assessed differently for the era of the sustained reduction in fertility than for the preceding period. All in all, the prevalent customs and attitudes are regarded as being vital to infants’ survival chances. We therefore need to look at attitudes among the educated public and the authorities. Efforts on the part of these groups to bring about change were particularly observed in the South West, where an awareness of the dramatic prob- lem arose comparatively early. Further historic research at the regional level will be needed in order to achieve a fi nal evaluation of these processes. Keywords: Infant mortality · Germany · 19th century · Female labour · Urbanisation · Public intervention * In collaboration with Rembrandt Scholz (Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Ros- tock), it is thanks to his initiative that this paper was drafted.